1

POISONED BY MY NEIGHBOR FROM HELL

PRESENTS

About Celeste Cirinna Clerk, City of Montrose, Ia.

About Celeste Cirinna dba “Executive Manager” City of Montrose, Lee County, Iowa

The next slide shows in the circled area Value is handwritten $40,880 Fee $ is blank. The issue date at the top is 7-12-2004. Boatner had only noticed that this permit is invalid due to the fact that there no signature of the builder as required by State of Iowa law. Clearly Building Administrator Holland did not follow general procedure when issuing this permit.

2

3

Original Building Permit Filedat Montrose City Hall.In the circled area Value is handwritten $40,880 Fee $ is blank. The issue date at the top is 7-12-2004. Complainant had only noticed that this permit was invalid due to no Builder's signature. Building Administrator Holland was intentionally negligent at least for his lack of oversight and pre-approval of issuance of this permit and every other issue on behalf of Mr. Conlee. The question is why did these City Officials conspire to appease Mr. Conlee’s every unlawful action? I believe some were accomplices to the suspicious fire that destroyed the existing home. Mark Holland was the fire chief at that time.

4

Due to the fact that Building Administrator Mark Holland, being the only authority qualified to address Boatner's concerns to the foreseeable adverse effects to her property refused that duty after multiple requests from Boatner. He stated to witness Council member Cathy Roberts Farnsworth that he had no intention of do his appointed duty. Boatner was referred to contact Lee County Extension Agent Robert Dodds. As a professional courtesy Mr. Dodds wrote the following letter to Mayor Dinwiddie on Boatner's behalf.

Having never met Mr. Dodds, Boatner unaware Dodds was a resident of Montrose and he points out 2 significant issues in which standard procedure were not followed in reference to the building permit issued by Building Admin Mark Holland for Mark Conlee's new home as noted on the following slide.

There is another expert Government employee who lives in the City of Montrose. His title is FEMA officer. His name is Steve Cirinna. He is the husband of Celeste Cirinna. I did not attempt to request his assistance due to the obvious conflict of interest. I did on one occasion notice the reference manual was laying on the counter at City Hall. Obviously someone had reviewed the information. Evidence that the nuisance drainage was an intentional act to cause adverse effects to Boatner property.

I contacted many outside agencies. All responded with the same advice that I was previously educated about. They referred me to the proper authority, City of Montrose Building Administrator Mark Holland. Holland consistently refused his appointed duty.

Its is a publication provided by FEMA that details No Adverse Impact and Common Law.

Building Administrator Opts Out?

Original Building Permit On File At Montrose City Hall

5

$ Fee Paid is Blank as noted by Robert Dodd

Permit unsigned by builder, liability is the City of Montrose’s responsibility as noted by Mayor Dinwiddie

6

Building Permit Altered From Original Document Filed At City Hall

Document Fraud

Unsigned by builder as required by State Law

Receipt dated 1-11-2007 Boatner for copy of original building permit on file for Mark Conlee's new home dated 7-12-2004 that proves Celeste Cirinna committed ethical violations and document fraud, a serious criminal offense in any other County Boatner anonymously contacted Lee County Attorney Michael Short by telephone requesting an investigation into criminal charges. Mr. Short stated that he had a problem with the issues I explained to him. Boatner arrived at his office shortly after. When the identity of the criminal was exposed he determined he had no problem. He told Boatner that he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County. Michael Short participated in violating Rights to Equal Protection of the Law

7

After Mark Conlee was Elected to City Council The Status Changed,Receipt Showing Date I Requested What I Knew Would be Forged Documents due to Conlee and Holland’s Behavior at the Meeting

The next slide shows evidence of document fraud. The sentence that is underlined with red is yet another count of document fraud. There is no ordinance that states anything about landscape fabric. During a meeting that Sally Fowler Sandquist, Helen Fowler, and I had with Mayor Tony Scumbaito at that time. The main purpose of this meeting was to discuss the fact that chemicals had been unlawfully applied to my property by the City of Montrose and had washed downstream killing all living things on the properties of my neighbors Sandquist and Fowler.. I was already well aware of the chemicals, my intention was to find out why my nuisance abatement notice included a fraudulent ordinance. When I brought this subject up and showed Mayor Scumbaito my copy of the abatement notice asking why my notice included a fraudulent ordinance. Mayor Scumbaito had no answer. After a few uncomfortable moments city clerk Celeste Cirinna admitted that she had falsified that ordinance for me in particular. Celeste Cirinna had committed the 3rd offense of document fraud. Standard procedure would require Cirinna immediate termination and criminal charges for violating ethics and criminal law. At the least administrative leave until an investigation had been completed. Cirinna has never been reprimanded. Mayor Scumbaito resigned his position as Mayor of the City of Montrose one year into his term. Council Member Jeff Junkins served Mayor Pro Tem the rest of Scumbaito’s term. A conflict of interest exits as Jeff Junkins is a fellow member of the Montrose Fire Dept. and a co-worker of Mark Conlee at Climax Molybdenum Co.

8

No Government Accountability for Fraud

9

Conspiracy Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

Conspiracy Intent to Cause Financial Harm

Document Fraud

Fraudulent Ordinance

Fraudulent Ordinance

10

(Code of Iowa, Sec. 718.5)

1.09    ALTERING CODE. It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to change or amend by additions or deletions, any part or portion of the Code of Ordinances, or to insert or delete pages, or portions thereof, or to alter or tamper with the Code of Ordinances in any manner whatsoever which will cause the law of the City to be misrepresented thereby.

(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.3[2])

1.10    STANDARD PENALTY. Unless another penalty is expressly provided by the Code of Ordinances for any particular provision, section or chapter, any person failing to perform a duty, or obtain a license required by, or violating any provision of the Code of Ordinances, or any rule or regulation adopted herein by reference shall be guilty of a simple misdemeanor and, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment not to exceed thirty (30) days. (Ord. 196 – Feb. 06 Supp.)

1.11    SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Code of Ordinances is adjudged invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication will not affect the validity of the Code of Ordinances as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.

11

PAGE 221MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING JULY 7, 2005

The Montrose City Council met for Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. on the 7TH day of July 2005. Council met at City Hall, 102 S. 2nd St. pursuant to law with Mayor Ronald Dinwiddie presiding and the following Council members present: Brisby, Holland, Junkins, Roberts and Slater.

PAGE 225MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING JULY 7, 2005, PAGE 5Holland tells Cirinna to call the County Engineer about getting gravel on the roadside from the Cemetery out. Cirinna says they have already been called and they are looking into it. Holland and Junkins will get together to look at properties for the nuisance ordinance. He says he has a letter from the State Ombudsman’s office requesting copies of building permits. She stated to him that someone at City Hall told her they could not help her.

KNOWINGLY MADE FALSE STATEMENT. According a decision that determine there was no evidence to support further investigation in a complaint I made to the Ombudsman. Cirinna stated to the investigator that she did not know what the meeting with Mayor Scumbaito was about. Clearly she did know the reason, I was there was to find out who committed document fraud on only my nuisance abatement notice. I also have a letter from the Iowa Ombudsman dated several weeks after the meeting with Mayor Scumbaito. In this letter Celeste Cirinna knowingly made false statements. This document is available and will be uploaded as requested.A different time the Ombudsman called city hall requesting copies of the building permits and according to the public record Cirinna told them that nobody could assist with that request.

As intended, I was unable to pay my utilities for the City water, sewer and garbage. The kindness of Pastor of Trinity Methodist Church, Goldie Layman went to Montrose City Hall to pay on my past due account from her personal checking account. The date of this action was I believe 2009, Pastor Layman would have the record of the written check. According to the Pastor, Clerk Cirinna refused payment stating that any payment on my account had to come out of Boatners pocket. Pastor Layman indicated to me that she was livid, I believe that was the term she used. Pastor Layman went to the bank and cashed her personal check and came to my house so she could give me the cash and I could, without being properly dressed, go in Montrose City Hall myself and pay cash on my account. I know that is an ethical violation. Personally it falls under my moral law that I sentenced her to. Whipping Celeste Cirinna’s ass if and when we happen to cross paths in the future. This concludes the summary offenses that Clerk Cirinna was involved in against me. The bigger fish are yet to be fried. My character had been defamed since the beginning of this nightmare, they said I was “crazy”. This evidence is indisputable. Conspiracy Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.

12

Intent to Cause Financial Harm

§ 68B.2A  Conflicts of interest -- outside employment and activities

.1.  Any person who serves or is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state shall not engage in any outside employment or activity which is in conflict with the person's official duties and responsibilities. In determining whether particular outside employment or activity creates an unacceptable conflict of interest, situations in which an unacceptable conflict shall be deemed to exist shall include, but not to be limited to, any of the following:a.  The outside employment or activity involves the use of the state's or the political subdivision's time, facilities, equipment, and supplies or the use of the state or political subdivision badge, uniform, business card, or other evidences of office or employment to give the person or member of the person's immediate family an advantage or pecuniary benefit that is not available to other similarly situated members or classes of members of the general public. This paragraph does not apply to off-duty peace officers who provide private duty security or fire fighters or emergency medical care providers certified under chapter 147A who provide private duty fire safety or emergency medical services while carrying their badge or wearing their official uniform, provided that the person has secured the prior approval of the agency or political subdivision in which the person is regularly employed to engage in the activity. For purposes of this subsection, a person is not "similarly situated" merely by being or being related to a person who serves or is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state.b.  The outside employment or activity involves the receipt of, promise of, or acceptance of money or other consideration by the person, or a member of the person's immediate family, from anyone other than the state or the political subdivision for the performance of any act that the person would be required or expected to perform as a part of the person's regular duties or during the hours during which the person performs service or work for the state or political subdivision of the state.c.  The outside employment or activity is subject to the official control, inspection, review, audit, or enforcement authority of the person, during the performance of the person's duties of office or employment.2.  If the outside employment or activity is employment or activity described in subsection 1, paragraph "a" or "b", the person shall immediately cease the employment or activity. If the outside employment or activity is employment or activity described in subsection 1, paragraph "c", or constitutes any other unacceptable conflict of interest, unless otherwise provided by law, the person shall take one of the following courses of action:a.  Cease the outside employment or activity.b.  Publicly disclose the existence of the conflict and refrain from taking any official action or performing any official duty that would detrimentally affect or create a benefit for the outside employment or activity. For purposes of this paragraph, "official action" or "official duty" includes, but is not limited to, participating in any vote, taking affirmative action to influence any vote, granting any license or permit, determining the facts or law in a contested case or rulemaking proceeding, conducting any inspection, or providing any other official service or thing that is not available generally to members of the public in order to further the interests of the outside employment or activity.3.  Unless otherwise specifically provided the requirements of this section shall be in addition to, and shall not supersede, any other rights or remedies provided by law.

15

Penalties for Actions of Celeste Cirinna, Executive ManagerCity of Montrose, Ia

Iowa http://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-chart-criminal-penalties-for-public-corr.aspx

Giving false information on authorized receipts, returns, entries or certificates; falsifying public records or falsely purporting something to be a public record(felonious misconduct in office)

CC §721.1

Class D felonyMax. imprisonment 5 years; max. fine $750-$7,500

Knowingly and intentionally violating ethics provisions found in Chapter 68B

Entering to a contract for more than authorized by law; failing to report receipt or expenditure of public funds; requesting or receiving additional compensation for required job functions; using or permitting another to use state property for private or political purpose; failing to perform any duty required; demanding contributions from public employees (non-felonious misconduct in office)

Using public motor vehicles for political purposes

Misuse of public records, involves releasing public records or information for a greater fee than allowed by law

Interest in public contracts; unlawful interest in public contracts

EC §68B.34 CC §721.2 CC §721.4 CC §721.10 CC §721.11Serious misdemeanorMax. imprisonment 1 year; max. fine $250-$1,500