Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | delilah-goodman |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with:I Aga Khan Foundation I Bitrán y Asociados I BRAC University I Broad Branch Associates I Deloitte Consulting, LLP I Forum One Communications I RTI International I Training Resources Group I Tulane University’s School of Public Health
better systems, better health
International AIDS Financing Architecture
Carlos AvilaJuly 23, 2012
AIDS Healthcare Foundation Satellite Session
The AIDS Financial Crisis: Life or Death for Millions
Resources available for AIDS in low- and middle-income countries, 2002-2011
Global Resources to HIV-related programmes in low and middle income countries by financing source, 2011
Domestic public and private (49%)Donor Governments
(33%)
GFATM (11%)
Other multilaterals (3%)
Philanthropics (3%)
Total resource available for HIV- related programmes in 2010
Resources available for AIDS in low- and middle-income countries, 2002-2011
US$
Billi
on
Estimated global HIV funding was up 11% in 2011, with Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa leading the way
HIV investment needed in low- and middle-income countries
Eligibility for antiretroviral therapy versus coverage, low- and middle income countries, by region, 2011
Share of care and treatment expenditure originating from international assistance, African countries, 2010
Current trends in AIDS Financing
Global spending on HIV reached US$ 16.8 billion in 2011. Domestic resources in LMIC support more than 50% of the global
response, with 41% coming from sub-Saharan Africa, often funding their own response in innovative ways.
International assistance is essentially flat, and some donor countries are reducing their funding.
Donor countries by meeting the development assistance commitments of 0.7% of their GNI, would double ODA across sectors, from US$ 133 billion to almost US$ 280 billion, and the HIV funding gap could be easily filled.