+ All Categories
Home > Design > Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Date post: 27-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: derek-poppink
View: 105 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
18
Derek Poppink September 15, 2010 Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries
Transcript
Page 1: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Derek PoppinkSeptember 15, 2010

Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Page 2: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

What is User Experience?

A Quality “A person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated

use of a product, system or service” - ISO 9241

Emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological responses, behaviors and accomplishments

A Discipline “Multi-disciplinary field incorporating aspects of psychology, anthropology,

sociology, computer science, graphic design, industrial design and cognitive science”

A Process “Places the end user at the focal point of design and development efforts, as

opposed to the system, its applications or its aesthetic value alone”

Page 3: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

What is User Experience?

Page 4: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Accessibility

“The extent to which products, systems, services, environments, or facilities can be used by people from a population with the widest range of capabilities to achieve specified goals in a specified context of use.”

Recent News

Department of Justice & Department of Education ask colleges and universities to

refrain from requiring inaccessible electronic readers (June, 2010)

Department of Justice announces plans to prepare new ADA regulations (July,

2010)

Websites as “public accommodations”

College web pages are ‘widely inaccessible' to people with disabilities according to

UW study (August, 2010)

Page 5: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Improved Accessibility Benefits All Users

Curb Cuts Wheelchairs Strollers, skaters, bikers

Subtitles Hearing disabilities Noisy or quiet environments

ReadSpeaker Visual disabilities Mobile, multitasking, language

learners

Page 6: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Credibility

“The objective and subjective components of the believability of a source or message. Traditionally, credibility has two key components: trustworthiness and expertise.”

Stanford Web Credibility Guidelines Make it easy to verify the accuracy of the

information on your site.

Show that there's a real organization behind your site.

Highlight the expertise in your organization and in the content and services you provide.

Show that honest and trustworthy people stand behind your site.

Make it easy to contact you.

Design your site so it looks professional (or is appropriate for your purpose).

Make your site easy to use -- and useful.

Update your site's content often (at least show it's been reviewed recently).

Use restraint with any promotional content (e.g., ads, offers).

Avoid errors of all types, no matter how small they seem.

Page 7: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Academic Credibility

Page 8: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Desirability

“Aesthetically pleasing objects appear to the user to be more effective, by virtue of their sensual appeal.”

Emotional Design Dimensions Visceral

Behavioral

Reflective

Page 9: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Academic Desirability

Page 10: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Findability

“The quality of being locatable or navigable. The degree to which a particular object is easy to discover or locate. The degree to which a system or environment supports navigation and retrieval.”

Page 11: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Academic Findability

Project Information Literacy (PIL) Findings Students relied on a small, familiar set of resources (especially Google and

Wikipedia).

Students tended to use the same information resources for both academic research and everyday life research.

Students turned to course reading lists first, followed by Wikipedia.

90% of students used online scholarly research databases.

80% of students make “rare” or no use of librarian services.

Students preferred instructors over librarians as “coaches”.

Page 12: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Usefulness

“The quality of being of practical use.”

Page 13: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Academic Usefulness

Project Information Literacy Findings Time constraints and information overwhelm lead to student research strategy of

“satisficing”.

Students attempt to develop domain knowledge before engaging scholarly research databases.

70% of students use Wikipedia to “background” a topic.

Students also use course materials and instructor to “get unstuck” at the outset of research.

Instructor’s written guidelines are crucial for defining information-gathering context for students’ research.

Most handouts do not provide critical guidance students need on how to identify a focus and how to use search tools effectively.

“The need for context-sensitive presearch sources and coaching services appears to be in high demand. There is a need for solutions that logically bridge the early stages of research with the rest of the research process and deliver…efficiencies students expect.”

Page 14: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Usability

“The capability of the software to be understood, learned, used and attractive to the user when used under specified conditions” – ISO 9126

Jakob Nielsen’s Usability Heuristics Visibility of system status

Match between system and the real world

User control and freedom

Consistency and standards

Error prevention

Recognition rather than recall

Flexibility and efficiency of use

Aesthetic and minimalist design

Error recognition, diagnosis, and recovery

Help and documentation

Page 15: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Prioritizing Web Usability

Home Page Behavior

25-35 secs on Home page

23% scroll (avg 0.8 screenfuls)

Subsequent visits are lower

Priorities:

Identify site

Describe benefits

Summarize content

Provide navigation choices

Site-Specific Success : 66%

Lower for web-wide tasks

Experience difference ~14%

Interior Page Behavior

45-60 secs

Viewed (in order): content, header, left column, right column, footer

Priorities for deep links

Logo, Home link, Search

Hierarchy (breadcrumb)

Related resources

Search Dominance/Success

Google, Yahoo, MSN: 56%

Others: 33%

Used 88% time in web-wide tasks

51% click first link

Page 16: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

What is Academic User Experience?

Accessible = Universal Credible = Citable Desirable = Engaging Findable = Convenient Usable = Simple Useful = Relevant

Page 17: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

B.J. Fogg, Stanford Web Credibility Guidelines (2002)

Department of Justice, www.justice.gov (2010)

Don Norman, Emotional Design (2005)

Head & Eisenberg, How College Students Use Wikipedia for Course-Related Research (2010)

Oracle Accessibility Program, www.oracle.com/accessibility (2010)

Peter Morville, Ambient Findability (2005) & Semantic Studios (2002, 2004)

Jakob Nielsen, Prioritizing Web Usability (2006)

Randall Munroe, xkcd.com (2010)

SitePoint Glossary (2010)

Tadeusz Szewczyk, SEO Blog (2008)

Thompson, Burgstahler, & Moore, Web Accessibility: A Longitudinal Study of College and University Home Pages in the Northwestern United States (2010)

University of Washington, Project Information Literacy (2010)

Various, Wikipedia (2010)

Thank My Sources

Page 18: Academic User Experience: Students, Faculty, and Libraries

Questions? Comments?


Recommended