Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | egbert-golden |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Access to General Curriculum for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities
Diane M. Browder, PhD
Tracie-Lynn Zakas
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Something is happening to curriculum for students with significant disabilities
Access to general curriculum
Where did the idea originate? Why has this idea persisted? Is there any research to support it? What happens to functional life skills?
Whose Idea Was Access to General Curriculum? Momentum of
increasing expectations
Serendipity in federal policy
Changing Curricular Context for Students with Significant Disabilities Early 1970s
Adapting infant/ early childhood curriculum for students with significant disabilities of all ages
1980s Rejected
“developmental model” Functional, life skills
curriculum emerged
1990s Also: social inclusion
focus Also: self
determination focus 2000
General curriculum access (academic content)
Plus earlier priorities (functional, social, self determination)
Serendipity
ser·en·dip·i·ty (srn-dp-t)
NOUN: pl. ser·en·dip·i·ties The faculty of making fortunate discoveries by
accident. The fact or occurrence of such discoveries. An instance of making such a discovery.
IDEA 1997
All students have access to general curriculum content
All students assessed on state standards Creation of alternate
assessment
All? Content? What is an alternate
assessment?
No Child Left Behind
Schools accountable for ALL students
AYP in language arts/reading, math, and science
Did you say ALL? Schools are
accountable?
NCLB Regulations/ Guidance
AYP: can use alternate achievement standards for up to 1% of Ss with SCD
These standards must be based on academic content linked to grade level
Really reading? Really math? Science??
What promoted general curriculum access….
A national focus on reading, math, and science…
Includes all students (yes, including Ss with significant cognitive disabilities)…
Schools report as part of AYP (yes, including Ss with
significant cognitive disabilities)
Why has the idea of general curriculum access persisted? False starts and new
hopes Research on AA
Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2004). The alignment of alternate assessment content with academic and functional curricula. Journal of Special Education, 37, 211-233.
UNC Charlotte Research on Alignment of Alternate Assessments New hopes (strong
links to standards) Math
Compare volumes of more and less
Use strategies such as counting, measuring, to determine possible outcomes in problem solving
Reading Answer questions related
to story Identify pattern in familiar
story
False starts (weak link to standards)
Math Replace rollers in
beauty parlor Measure growth of
fingernails Reading
Show anticipation on roller coaster
Attend to visual stimuli
Have we gotten carried away with our hopefulness?
What does research indicate about whether students with moderate and severe disabilities can learn academics?
Reading: Mostly sight words (without comprehension)
Literature Review Categories for Reading128 experiments (119 articles)
36
117
135
31
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Fluency Vocab Phonics PhonemicAwareness
Comp
Components of Reading
Fre
qu
ency
Browder, D. Wakeman, S., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, R.F. (2006). A comprehensive review of reading for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children. 72, 392-410.
Math: Mostly moneyLiterature Review Categories for Math
55 experiments (53 articles)
15
30
10
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Numbers andoperations
Measurement Data analysis Geometry Algebra
Browder, D., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. (in submission). A comprehensive review of research to teach math to students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Science: Almost nothing!
0 0 0
1
0
9
00
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Science as
inquiry
Physical science Life science Earth and space
science
Science and
technology
Personal and
social
perspectives
History and
nature
Courtade-Little, G., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. (Accepted). A literature review of science for students with significant disabilities. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities.
Evidence?
Known How to use systematic
prompting and fading to teach some academic skills
How to apply for students with severe as well as moderate disabilities
Sight words and money!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Learning as we go How to extend to other
areas of academic content
How to adapt for students with most significant disabilities
Have we lost sight of the big picture?
Functional life skills Preparation for adult
life in the community
Academics vs. Life Skills
Both can be taught; both are important Academics can be taught in ways that are meaningful We do not know what students can learn until we try
teaching the content Life skills are not a prerequisite to learning academics Students who are not disabled do not have to master all
life skills to be eligible to learn to read; double standard Balance is needed-in planning IEPs and developing daily
schedule
Questions and Review
Where did the idea of teaching more academic content to students with significant disabilities?How is it part of an ongoing evolution of curriculum
for this population?How is it meant to “add to” not “replace” the
teaching of functional life skills? What might we “off load” so there is time and energy to
teach more academics?
Your questions and comments
Knowledge Needed to Implement General Curriculum Content A clear understanding of what it means to
teach general curriculum content linked to grade level standards
Examples of interventions teachers can follow as models for planning instruction
Social validation from students and parents that goals and outcomes are valued and meaningful
What is Access to
General Curriculum Content?
Access to the general curriculum for students who in the past focused solely on functional or remedial academics requires NEW THINKING ABOUT CURRICULUM
What Is Access to General Curriculum Content? Browder, D.M., Wakeman, S.Y.,
Flowers, C., Rickelman, R.J., Pugalee, D., & Karvonen, M. (Accepted). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education.
Seven Criteria for Access to the General Curriculum Four derived from
federal policy Three based on needs
of population
Criterion 1: The Content is AcademicSelf check I am familiar with my state standards I know the major strands of math, science,
language arts/ reading I collaborate with general education teachers I realize that this might be difficult I may need to commit to some research and
self-study to learn my state standards
Criterion 2- The student’s assigned grade level is the point of reference Middle School (Grades (6-8) Literature of Focus: The Call of the Wild by
Jack London Students read chapters of book on grade level and
make diagram (e.g., fishbone) of story events describing cause and effect with evidence.
identify facts and opinions related to the characters write a narrative comparing Phillip’s quality of life before
and after the boat accident using evidence from the text.
Criterion 3-The Achievement Level Differs from Grade Level Examples of Alternate Achievement for The Call of the Wild
Students hear chapter summaries read and participate using pictures, repeated story lines, and controlled vocabulary.
Students select pictures for fishbone diagram after hearing story.
Students use pictures to answer simple yes/no questions about characters in the story (e.g., Was Buck a dog?)
Students compare events from their own life to events in Buck’s life in the story using a yes/no chart, and a Venn diagram.
Criterion 4- Differentiation in achievement across grade levels/bands
Elementary Children’s picture
books provide support for comprehension
Stories have simpler themes and story lines
Answers can more often be found on the page (matching)
Middle School Chapter books; student
follows along in own book This may be an adapted
book Books may have picture
symbol supports; objects may still be used to support comprehension
Themes are more mature More content from which
to glean answer
Criteria 5- Promote access to grade level activities, materials, contexts
- JAFTA – Thinking Map (by Bree Jimenez)
Criteria 6- Content centrality and when possible, performance centrality
State Standard: Student will identify,
analyze, and apply knowledge of the structure and elements of fiction
Content Structure and elements of
fiction Performance
Identify, analyze, and apply knowledge of
Camilla will use her AAC to greet peers in English class Content? No Performance? No
Camilla will choose a fictional story Content? Yes? Performance? Some
Camilla will use pictures to identify components of a fictional story Content? Yes? Performance? Stronger
link
Criteria 7- Multiple levels of access to general curriculum Some students with significant disabilities
rely on nonsymbolic communication or may have limited intentionality in communication; consideration needs to be given to expectations for these students
Questions and Review
Self Check: I can explain-Strands/ domains of academic content“Grade appropriate” instruction
How is it like “age appropriate” instruction; what is different about this term
How to teach grade level content but with ALTERNATE achievement
Examples of students at different symbolic levels Your questions and comments
Steps To Align Instruction: From General Curriculum to IEP
What’s available Grade level standards Typical content Alternate achievement Alignment Enhancement Pivotal Skills for the IEP
Step One: What’s Available?
List the domains of content for each academic area to begin creating a curriculum planning chartE.g., Mathematics may include data analysis,
geometry, algebra, numbers and computation, measurement
Use the categories of your state standards
Step Two: Grade Level Focus
Identify the student’s specific grade level Obtain the state standards for this student’s
grade level and any state extensions “Alternate Knowledge & Skills”
Review together as an IEP team List some priority standards in your curriculum
chart; general educators can help you know which are “core” to overall learning
A Thought: By looking at the general standards you may discover other ideas for teaching the curriculum not identified in the AA guidelines.
Step Three: Typical Content
For the priority standards, ask general educator to give examples of activities, materials, key concepts taught To be sure everyone
understands the standards and to create a framework for the next steps
Discuss how teaching this typical content could be done using principles of UDL; share resources on UDL with team This discussion can
promote planning for all children from the beginning
Example: BiographiesGrade Level Achievement
Standard Compare and contrast elements of biographies
Symbolic Level: Reads and writes at grade level
Content Biographies of well known Americans
Depth of knowledge Requires connecting ideas
Activities/skills Silent reading of biography; answer questions about
comparisons; compose biography with all elements
Step Four: Alternate Achievement
Target what this student’s goal for achievement will be related to these standards In Idaho you can use “Alternate Sample
Applications” In the next three slides, we suggest a way of
thinking about different levels of access
Alternate AchievementLevel 1- Symbolic Standard
Compare and contrast elements of biographies Symbolic Level:
Reads sight words & sentences with pic symbols; writes sight words or can circle large vocabulary of picture symbols
Content Biographies of well known Americans
Depth of knowledge Requires connecting ideas
Activities/skills Read aloud biography written in simple sentences with picture cues; circle
pictures to answer questions about comparisons; compose biography by selecting pictures and making captions
Alternate AchievementLevel 2- Concrete Symbolic Standard
Compare and contrast elements of biographies Symbolic Level
Recognizes a few picture symbols; recognizes larger number familiar objects and can use some symbolically
Content Biographies of well known Americans
Depth of knowledge comprehension
Activities/skills Simplified text with pictures and repeated lines and vocabulary read to
student about; student selects pictures to answer question about the story; puts pictures into circles to show “same” and “different” to compare biography with own life story
Alternate AchievementLevel 3- Presymbolic Standard
Compare and contrast elements of biographies Symbolic Level
Picture recognition is inconsistent, must be paired with objects; communicates by looking at/ moving to objects or people
Content Biographies of well known Americans
Depth of knowledge recall/ matching
Activities/skills Adapted text with pictures read with student; objects also used to give
meaning; student looks at/ points to objects from story
Alternate Achievement-Special Consideration Standard
Compare and contrast elements of biographies Symbolic Level
No consistent voluntary responding that can be used reliably (continue to observe for response/ AT consultations)
Content Biographies of well known Americans
Depth of knowledge Level ?: Awareness
Activities/skills Adapted text with pictures read with student; objects also used to give
meaning; note whether student made any response to these stimuli (change in respiration, opened eyes, vocalizes)
Scaffold Concept of Biography by Using Autobiography First
Standard Compare and contrast elements of biographies
Symbolic Level Recognizes a few picture symbols; recognizes larger number familiar
objects and can use some symbolically Content
Biographies of family members; autobiography Depth of knowledge
Level: connections Activities/skills
Adapted text with pictures read with student; objects also used to give meaning; student compares elements of family member’s and own story into “same”/ “different” charts using pictures/objects
Scaffold Understanding of Life Story by Beginning with a Display Standard
Compare and contrast elements of biographies Symbolic Level
Recognizes a few picture symbols; recognizes larger number familiar objects and can use some symbolically
Content Biographies of famous Americans
Depth of knowledge Level: Comprehension
Activities/skills Adapted text with pictures read with student; recreates biography by
placing objects related to story on shelf for biography display as teacher rereads story
Step 5: Double Check for Alignment
A match between the written, taught, and tested curriculum
Curriculum
Instruction Assessment
Alignment of Instruction
As you plan instruction based on standards and using your state’s guide for alternate assessment, you create this “match” or alignment
Questions and Review
We have some more steps to help you get from standards to lesson plans and IEPs, but before we move on…Are you clear about how to translate a
standard into a skill you can teach students in your classroom? Questions?
In the slides to follow, we are going to give you a few more ideas from our work
An Intervention Strategy
Task analytic instruction Student masters the academic routine General curriculum content can vary
Student learns to generalize routine to the new content
An Intervention Strategy
Task analytic instruction
Student masters the academic routine
General curriculum content can vary Student learns to
generalize routine to the new content
Middle School Literacy Study
Browder, D.M., Trela, K.C., & Jimenez, B. (In preparation). Increasing participation of middle school students with severe disabilities in reading of grade appropriate literature.
Zakas, T. L., Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (In preparation). The Effects of Peer Support in Reading Adapted Grade Level Books on the Literary Responses of Middle School Aged Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities
Literacy Task Analysis:What Teacher or Peer Tutor Does Before Reading
Use an attention getter Review vocabulary
(picture symbols/ sight words/ letter sounds)
Point to title Point to author Ask what story is
about (prediction)
While reading
Give turn to point to text as you read
Give turn to fill in repeated story line
Give opportunity to turn own pages
Give turn to find vocabulary on page
After reading
Ask comprehension question
Literacy Task Analysis:What Student Does Before Reading
Attends to attention getter
Identifies each word/ picture
Finds title Finds author Chooses picture or
says what story is about (makes a guess)
While teacher/peer reads Turns own pages Points to text as teacher
reads a line Anticipates word in
repeated story line Finds vocabulary on the
page After reading
Answers comprehension question
Baseline Intervention
Data for Penelope
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Data for Petunia
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Session
Data for Izzy
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Data for Tom
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Session
Item
s c
orrect
on
th
e
lite
racy c
heckli
st
Data for Jerrod
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Data for Cherish
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Data for Kasey
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Data for Tamika
01234
5678
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Sessions
Item
s c
orrect o
n t
he
literacy c
hecklist
Baseline Intervention
Math: Algebra
Jimenez, B., Browder, D.M., & Courtade-Little, G. (In preparation). Teaching an algebraic equation to students with moderate disabilities.
FirstFact
Sign Second Fact1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9
=LastFact
Solution : X = place number card in box
* * * * * * * * *
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10X
ADD SUBTRACT
+ -
Equation Prompt
Algebra Task Analysis
1. Student points to sum on equation (e.g., 7).How many (spoons) do you need?
2. Moves red marker to sum on chart (at 7) 3. Counts number of items in container and finds this known number on
equation (3)How many spoons do you already have? 4. Moves the green marker to known number on chart (at 3) 5. Count to the sum with materials (from 3 to 7)How many more spoons will
you need to get? 6. Selects the number counted (4) 7. Puts correct number in for x in for formula (4) 8.Puts correct number needed in container (4 items) 9. Solves for x (writes 4 for x=4)
For more [email protected]
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
SESSIONS
NU
MB
ER
OF
ST
EP
S C
OR
RE
CT
ON
TA
SK
AN
AL
YS
IS
Jack
Leo
Cindy
Baseline Intervention
Ss given task analysis
Triangle = generalization across materials Square = generalization to general ed setting, with peer Star = Maintenance Data
Science
Courtade, G. (2006). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction Training on Teachers of Students with Significant Disabilities. Doctoral Dissertation, UNC Charlotte.
Students learn about density.
Science Steps
Engage Student interacts with materials and communicates what wants to
know Investigate & Describe Relationships
Plans ways to gather information Looks for pattern
Construct Explanation Communicates explanation Tests explanation
Report Communicates what found (e.g., selects picture)
Contact Ginevra Courtade-Little for more information.
Teacher 1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Teacher 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Teacher 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Teacher 40
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 6 11 16 21 26 31
Baseline Intervention
Num
ber
of le
sson
com
pone
nts
taug
ht d
urin
g sc
ienc
e in
stru
ctio
n
Results-Teachers
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Monica
Kyle
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Valerie
Charlotte
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Max
David
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 6 11 16 21 26 31
Susan
Edward
Baseline Intervention
Num
ber
of I
nqui
ry S
kill
s A
cqui
red
by th
e S
tude
nts
duri
ng S
cien
ce I
nstr
ucti
on
Results-Students
Step 6: Enhancement
In this step we apply some of the values we have for working with students with significant disabilities to be sure the academic content we teach will be meaningful and beneficial
Value Added: Promote literacy across the curriculum Brian will eye gaze to select pictures to be
included in a picture report for science Melissa will identify the main characters of
a story by using pictures/ initial letter sounds for their names.
Nadia will select the picture/word phrase that best summarizes the math problem to be solved.
Value added: Use assistive technology to increase active, independent responding Examples
John will read 10 complete sentences composed with Writing with Symbols using picture cues to identify at least one novel word per sentence.
After using assistive technology to independently read a Start-to-Finish novel, Henry will answer five comprehension questions based on the novel.
Value added: Promote Self Determination in academic learningChoice-making
Make choices within an activity Choose between two or more activities
Decision-making Decide topic for class project Determine best resource to use to get information
Problem-solving Look at a picture to determine why DVD player is not working Identify three alternative ways character in story could resolve a
conflict
Goal setting Set a goal for number of books to be read in a month Identify and communicate IEP goals
Self management / self evaluation Use a bar graph to track number of assignments completed Rate self on how well performed on given assignment
Self awareness Develop picture/word list of likes and dislikes Develop and learn to read a list of “facts about me”
Value Added: Apply Academic Skill to a Real Life Activity Academic skills can be taught in
functional, meaningful contexts
Consider the students chronological age and life environments (home, work, leisure, community)
Examples of Functional Applications How do we get from the music store to the
food court when we go to the mall?To practice drawing a line segment
Recipe for Sweet Southern TeaSugar melts better in the boiled water; steep
the tea; then ice…to apply how temperature affects solvents (Chemistry)
Step Six: Writing the IEP
Look at the curriculum map that has been createdDomains of academic contentPriority standards from the grade levelHow these standards are typically taught; could be
taught with UDLAchievement targets for this student’s symbolic level/
instructional levelDouble check alignment Enhance it- literacy, self determination, AT, functional
The IEP
Do not try to write a goal/ objective for each standard!!!!!!!!!!An IEP is not meant to be the curriculum; an
IEP shows how students ACCESS the curriculum
The IEP
Instead, look for pivotal skills that will access the target standards. Examples-Skills to indicate comprehension
E.g., point to select correct pictureSkills to synthesize learning
E.g., develop a reportSkills to gain information
E.g., ask a question; find internet siteCore content to be taught to mastery
E.g., target vocabulary
The IEP
Review other priority needsFunctional goalsTherapy goals
The IEP will have…
Goals to access general curriculum academic content
Functional goals Therapy goals Social goals Etc.
Social Validation
Parent perspective Student perspective
Questions and Review
What goes on the IEP?What background planning was needed to
write this standards-based IEP? Why NOT one IEP objective per standard?
Your questions and comments (Last call!!)
There can be no acting or doing of any kind, till it be recognized that there is a thing to be done; the thing once recognized, doing in a thousand shapes becomes possible.Thomas Carlyle
We learn to do something by doing it. There really is no other way. John Holt, Educator
Adventures don’t begin until you get into the forest. That first step is an act of faith.Mickey Hart, Grateful Dead Drummer
Contact Information
Diane M. Browder, PhDSnyder Distinguished Professor of Special EducationDepartment of Special EducationUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte9201 University City BlvdCharlotte, NC [email protected]
Project websitehttp://education.uncc.edu/access
New Resources
Browder, D.M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade-Little, G., & Snell, M.E. (2006). Access to the general curriculum. In M.E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Browder, D.M., & Spooner, F.H. (In press for 2006). Teaching reading, math, and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Courtade-Little, G. & Browder, D.M. & (2005). Aligning IEPs to academic content standards. Madison, WI: Attainment Co.