+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Date post: 01-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: crossboard-mobile
View: 1,682 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
As reported in eMarketer, ClickZ, and Econsultancy, Fortune 500 companies are using CPL advertising to build social brand groups and community sites in an accountable way.Check out the presentation and learn:• Marketers like Kimberly-Clark, Hewlett-Packard/Snapfish, eFax, Tommy Hilfiger, and more are connecting with interested consumers through social/community sites, newsletters, loyalty programs and other engagement vehicles.• The average cost of a marketing lead varies across different industry sectors, including retail, travel, consumer electronics, nonprofit and more.• Exclusive snapshots from the ASPCA social campaign that was highlighted in ClickZ.
32
Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks 2/25/10
Transcript
Page 1: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

2/25/10

Page 2: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

• The Growth of Social Marketing• Best Practices for Building Accountable

Social/Community Sites• CPL Benchmarks by Industry• Campaign snapshot: The ASPCA

Agenda

Page 3: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Social media is growing• Global time spent on

social networks increased 82% YOY.1

• In the U.S., average time spent increased 143% YOY.2

• Facebook is now the 2nd most popular site on the web.3

• Nearly 75 million people visited Twitter in January 2010.4

1 Nielsen, Dec 20092 Nielsen, Dec 20093 Compete.com, Feb 20104 ComScore, Feb 2010

Page 4: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Marketers are also building community sites

Page 5: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Pressure to show ROI from social community marketing is growing, tooOver 1/3 of marketers are committed to measuring social marketing returns1

1 The Altimeter Group, January 2010

Page 6: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

What makes social marketing measureable? 1. Acquire engaged users 2. Pay only for engaged users

Page 7: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Best Practices for Acquiring Engaged Users

1 The Altimeter Group, January 2010

Page 8: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Three ways to acquire users

Pay For Impressions

Pay For Clicks

Pay For Leads/Community members

CPM, CPC, CPLAvailable Online Pricing Models

Page 9: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

CPC and CPL [Performance]: Growing at the expense of CPM

“It’s no secret that CPM advertising delivers poor returns”

“The Internet is more and more a Performance-driven model”

- Sam Parry Director of Online Membership & Activism,

EDF

- Imran KhanManaging Director, J.P. Morgan

Internet Advertising Revenues By Pricing Model

Source: IAB/PWC

Page 10: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

What is CPC?Search ads: Advertisers pay only for clicks, not for impressions.

User clicks Redirected to landing

page

Fills out form Leads

Page 11: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

What is CPL?Sign up ads: Advertisers pay only when users sign up for communities or special offers, not for impressions or clicks.

User signs up inside ad Leads

Page 12: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

CPC and CPL: Both deliver users with high intent

CPC CPL

Page 13: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

But only CPL is the native pricing model for social marketing

Only pay for

Page 14: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

It’s not surprising that nearly 50% of people acquired through CPL were engaged through social/community sites….

Page 15: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Click costs are already well established…

Page 16: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Average Cost-per-Lead Across Industry Verticals

Page 17: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

Q3 Q4

$0.81

$3.36

$2.72

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Overall Q3-Q4 2009

$0.62

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Page 18: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Consumer Packaged Goods Q3-Q4 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

Q3 Q4

$0.78 $0.78$0.82

$1.01

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Page 19: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Travel Q3-Q4 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

Q3 Q4

$0.54

$1.27

$0.51

$1.39

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Page 20: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL Report Average CPL: Technology Q3-Q4 2009

Source: Pontiflex Internal Data, 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

Q3 Q4

$0.45

$0.98

$0.55

$1.22

Page 21: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Entertainment Q3-Q4 2009

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

Q3 Q4

$0.75$0.99

$3.00 $3.00

Page 22: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Retail Q3-Q4 2009

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Basic Fields $0.59

$0.60

$0.61

$0.62

$0.63

$0.64

Q3 Q4

$0.63

$0.61

Page 23: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Consumer Electronics Q3-Q4 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

Q3 Q4

$0.67$0.72

$0.65

$1.40

Source: Pontiflex Internal Data, 2009

Page 24: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

The Pontiflex CPL ReportAverage CPL: Non-profit/Advocacy Q3-Q4 2009

Basic Fields Premium Fields $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

Q3 Q4

$1.33 $1.44

$1.56

Source: Pontiflex Internal Research, Dec. 2009

Page 25: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Case StudyHow the ASPCA increased its donor base using CPL ads to build email, Facebook, and Twitter marketing programs.

Page 26: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Campaign Snapshot: The ASPCAStep 1: Ran CPL sign up ads on relevant sites

Page 27: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Campaign Snapshot: The ASPCAStep 2: Sent Relevant and Timely Emails

Page 28: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Email is the Gateway to Social Marketing

• 96% of consumers are willing to share email addresses to receive advertising offers/information

• Only 12% are willing to share social networking information1

1 Harris Interactive Survey, September 2009

Email Home/Work Address

Home/Cell/Work Telephone

Social Networking Information (Twitter

handle, etc)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All RespondentsRespondents Who Have Provided Information Online

Page 29: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Campaign Snapshot: The ASPCAStep 3: Engaged Through Social Media

E-mail is only one way to engage your member, donor, and advocate… When we combine all three (Facebook, Twitter and e-mail), we capture a bigger audience.

Debbie SwiderSenior E-Marketing Manager

Page 30: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Thank you!

Jon BeardsleyChief Revenue Officer

[email protected]

Page 31: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Appendix

Page 32: Accountable Social Marketing and CPL Benchmarks

Research Methodology: CPL BenchmarksData compiled for time period July 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009

Sample of 807 publisher websites

Leads included were non-incentivized, opt-in, and purchased on a Cost-per-Lead pricing model.

Consumer sample included adults 18+ in North America

Report does not include CPL figures for emerging media

Please note that the CPL for these media may be higher or lower than the data reported based on intent, content, and media type.


Recommended