Date post: | 28-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | elijah-wilson |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Achieving the 18 week maximum wait
Tom Bowen The Balance of Care Groupwww.balanceofcare.com
Routledge Health Management Conference14 September 2006
Community Admission Diagnosis Treatment Discharge
Rich Picture of Process Flow
Community Admission Diagnosis Treatment Discharge
Referral detail
Admission reason
Acute care
Rehabilitation
Interim care
Investigations
Assessment
Social circs
Risk factors
Discharge planning
Rich Picture of Process Flow
Community Admission Diagnosis Treatment Discharge
Referral detail
Admission reason
Acute care
Rehabilitation
Interim care
Investigations
Assessment
Social circs
Risk factors
Discharge planning
Earlierdischarge
ChronicDisease
Management
Alternativetherapysettings
Alternativediagnostics
settings
Admissionavoidance
Rich Picture of Process Flow
Content
• Models of elective patient flow through outpatients, diagnostics and inpatient services
• Identifying all the ‘knock-ons’ such as referral rates and decisions to admit
• Patient choice and the independent sector
• Generating commissioning plans and...
• ....implications for hospital activity and
capacity
Business Planning
Model
Bowen & Forte (1997)
What is the 18 week policy?
• 18 week maximum wait from referral to procedure
• ‘6-6-6’: could be six week maximum wait for each of outpatients, diagnostics and inpatient services
• “Redesign the whole patient pathway”
• “Abolish waiting lists”
Modelling Waiting Times - 1
Elective Waiting List for one PCT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1
mth
1 M
th
2 M
ths
3 M
ths
4 M
ths
5 M
ths
6 M
ths
7 M
ths
8 M
ths
9 M
ths+
Waiting time to date
Nu
mb
er
of p
atie
nts
Modelling Waiting Times - 2
Elective Waiting List for one PCT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1mth
1 Mth 2 Mths 3 Mths 4 Mths 5 Mths 6 Mths 7 Mths 8 Mths 9Mths+
Waiting time to date
Num
ber
of p
atie
nts
Modelling Waiting Times - 3Elective Waiting List for one PCT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1 m
th
1 M
th
2 M
ths
3 M
ths
4 M
ths
5 M
ths
6 M
ths
7 M
ths
8 M
ths
9 M
ths+
Waiting time to date
No
of p
atie
nts
Current
Planned
Modelling Waiting Times - 4
Elective Waiting List for one PCT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1mth
1 Mth 2 Mths 3 Mths 4 Mths 5 Mths 6 Mths 7 Mths 8 Mths 9Mths+
Waiting time to date
Num
ber
of p
atie
nts
Objectives of the exercise
• Activity projections and assessment of
capability to meet:
– 18 week maximum wait from referral to
procedure
– admission avoidance targets
– patient choice
• Identify independent sector role
• Cover PCT and Trust interests: ‘all levels’
Utilisation2003-04
Activity2003-04
Capacity2003-04
Capacity2007-08
Activity2007-08
spells/attendances
Length of stay
Occupancy
Building, closures
and alternativelocations of care
Utilisation2007-08
Schema for Modelling Activity and Capacity
Outpatients
Diagnostics
Non-electives
Electivesday + ord
Demand
Backlog
Demand
Backlog
Demand
Backlog
Activity Projections
Admissionavoidance
Tier 2
Outpatients-8%
Diagnostics0%
Non-electives-5%
Electivesordinary
+3%
beds
Volume changes
Day cases-35%
Patient choiceIS
ITC
GSUP
Independentsector
staff +2%
+2%
+40%
+2%
+33%
Key Findings
• Resource implications of achieving 18-week maximum wait may not be massive, but they need to be kept in balance
• Demand for MRI and CT is unclear, and may not be related to this pathway
• Key role for commissioners to set activity plans and negotiate delivery (even though it’s all in Payment by Results territory)
References
Bowen T and Forte P, 1997, Activity and capacity planning in an acute hospital. In: Cropper S and Forte P, (eds), Enhancing Health Services Management pp 86-102 (Milton Keynes, Open University Press)
www.balanceofcare.com