Date post: | 14-Dec-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jacqueline-roebuck-sakho |
View: | 117 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Restorative Justice
&Race
…A Theoretical Analysis
Jacqueline Roebuck Sakho, Duquesne University
Thursday, March 15, 2012
2012 ACJS Conference
March 15, 2012
2
RJ & Race
Theories to frame the discussion
• Critical Legal Theory
• Conard’s “Macrojustice” (Conard 1971)
• Critical Dialogic Approach (Nagda & Gurin, 2007)
Roebuck Sakho 20122
3
Why RJ?
“It is no longer clear that law can produce a more just society” (Merry 1995 p 12)
Roebuck Sakho 20123
4
Restorative Justice
Frames
March 15, 2012
5
RJ Cycle
Roebuck Sakho 20125
6
RJ Spectrum
Roebuck Sakho 20126
7
Restorative Justice & Race
Theoretical Frameworks
March 15, 2012
8
Restorative Justice
As Critical Legal Theory
March 15, 2012
9
Restorative Justice & CLT
• RJ troubles and disrupts accepted norms and standards in legal theory and practice
• RJ interrogates dimensions of power within both inter intra relationships
Roebuck Sakho 20129
10
Restorative Justice
Conard’s “Macrojustice”
Conard, 1971, p. 420)
March 15, 2012
11
Why RJ?
“We conceptualize law as more plural not located entirely in the state. And we see the “effects” of law in far broader post-Foucauldian terms.” (Merry, 1995 p. 12)
Roebuck Sakho 201211
12
Conardian Formula
Roebuck Sakho 201212
13
Conardian Formula
Reflection• “Nonomics”
• Quantitative
• Aggregative
Action• Law in action vs. Law
in books
• Measuring the effectiveness of processes/procedures
• Beyond the impact of the system on one case but a number of cases
Roebuck Sakho 201213
14
RJ in Conardian terms…
“Microjustice”• The Law
• The State
• The individual
“Macrojustice”• The Law as “total
consequences” (p. 420)
• Systemic Social Conflict
• Community Impact
Roebuck Sakho 201214
15
Restorative Justice
A Critical Dialogic Approach
March 15, 2012
16
Critical Dialogic Approach
• Three Components (Nagda & Gurin 2007, p. 36)• Critical analysis and understanding
of difference and dominance• Discursive engagement across
differences• Debate Discussion Dialogue (p.
37)
• Sustained and conjoint community building and conflict engagement
Roebuck Sakho 201216
17
Why RJ?
“…the hope for reform has moved to more bottom-up, small scale changes.” (Merry, 1995, p. 15)
Roebuck Sakho 201217
18
ReferencesConard, A. (1971) Macrojustice: A systematic approach to conflict resolution. Georgia Law Review, 5(3), 415
Merry, Sally Engle (1994)Resistance and the cultural power of law. Law & Society Review, 29 (1) 11
Nagda B.A., Gurin, P. (2007) Intergrouop dialogue: A critical-dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. 111, 35.
Roebuck Sakho18
19
Restorative Justice & Race
March 15, 2012