+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of the Vocera© … · Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of...

Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of the Vocera© … · Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of...

Date post: 28-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: dangque
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of the Vocera© B3000 Communication Badge Ronald Archer 1 , Harry Litaker 1 , Shao-Sheng R. Chu 1 , Cory Simon 2 , Andy Romero 2 , and Haifa Moses 2 1 Lockheed Martin, 2 NASA Johnson Space Center Introduction To communicate with each other or ground support, crew members on board the International Space Station (ISS) currently use the Audio Terminal Units (ATU), which are located in each ISS module. However, to use the ATU, crew members must stop their current activity, travel to a panel, and speak into a wall-mounted microphone, or use either a handheld microphone or a Crew Communication Headset that is connected to a panel. These actions unnecessarily may increase task times, lower productivity, create cable management issues, and thus increase crew frustration. Therefore, the Habitability and Human Factors and Human Interface Branches at the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) are currently investigating a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) wireless communication system, Vocera©, as a near-term solution for ISS communication. The objectives of the acoustics and intelligibility testing of this system were to answer the following questions: 1. How intelligibly can a human hear the transmitted message from a Vocera© badge in three different noise environments (Baseline = 20 dB, US Lab Module = 58 dB, Russian Module = 70.6 dB)? 2. How accurate is the Vocera© badge at recognizing voice commands in three different noise environments? 3. What body location (chest, upper arm, or shoulder) is optimal for speech intelligibility and voice recognition accuracy of the Vocera© badge on a human in three different noise environments? National Aeronautics and Space Administration Results 1. The shoulder and chest locations resulted in higher intelligibility scores. The Russian noise environment had the lowest intelligibility scores (Figure below). 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% Baseline US Russian Baseline US Russian Baseline US Russian Chest Upper Arm Shoulder Badge Location and Speaker Noise Environment Speech Intelligibility by Noise Environment and Badge Location Baseline US Russian Listener Noise Environment Conclusions Based upon the findings of these studies, the human factors engineers were able to determine the optimal location for the Vocera© B3000 badge to maximize the accuracy of communication for the astronaut using this device while living and working on the ISS. Even though the shoulder provided a slightly preferred location for the user’s ability to hear since the speaker was closest to their ears, the intelligibility and voice recognition data demonstrated the best overall performance of the badge’s speaker and microphones while at the chest location. Future studies will investigate the use of headsets as well as adding an attachment to the badge which will direct the sound upwards while worn on the chest. Methods Speech Intelligibility Study Voice Recognition Study Participants Participants The JSC Human Test Subject Facility provided 7 males and 5 females that were prescreened for normal hearing. A total of 10 (Five males and five females) completed the study. Experimental Design Experimental Design While utilizing male and female spoken words from the Modified Rhyme Test (MRT), the participants listened and were asked to identify nine words per condition. The conditions included the speakers and listeners in baseline, US, & Russian noise environments, and with the badge at the shoulder, chest, & upper arm locations. The participants spoke nine commands (e.g., “Call”, “Broadcast a message”, “Invite”, and “Log out”) while in the baseline, US, & Russian noise environments, and with the badge at both the shoulder & chest locations. Equipment Equipment Anechoic and space vehicle simulation acoustic chambers at JSC’s Acoustics and Noise Control Lab. Anechoic and reverberation chambers at JSC’s Audio Development Lab. Vocera© B3000 badge MRT Answer Sheet 2. The chest was the optimal location for achieving the highest voice recognition accuracy. The US and Baseline noise levels resulted in similar accuracy levels while the Russian noise environment experienced a decrease (Figure below). 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% Chest Shoulder Badge Location Voice Recognition Accuracy by Noise Environment and Badge Location Baseline (anechoic) Baseline (reverberation) US Russian 3. The participants preferred the shoulder location for their ability to hear, however they preferred the chest location in terms of the comfort and stability of the badge. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20120009451 2018-08-28T18:04:05+00:00Z
Transcript

Acoustical and Intelligibility Test of the Vocera© B3000 Communication Badge

Ronald Archer1, Harry Litaker1, Shao-Sheng R. Chu1, Cory Simon2, Andy Romero2, and Haifa Moses2

1Lockheed Martin, 2NASA Johnson Space Center

Introduction

To communicate with each other or ground support, crew members on board theInternational Space Station (ISS) currently use the Audio Terminal Units (ATU), which arelocated in each ISS module. However, to use the ATU, crew members must stop theircurrent activity, travel to a panel, and speak into a wall-mounted microphone, or use eithera handheld microphone or a Crew Communication Headset that is connected to a panel.These actions unnecessarily may increase task times, lower productivity, create cablemanagement issues, and thus increase crew frustration.

Therefore, the Habitability and Human Factors and Human Interface Branches at the NASAJohnson Space Center (JSC) are currently investigating a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS)wireless communication system, Vocera©, as a near-term solution for ISS communication.The objectives of the acoustics and intelligibility testing of this system were to answer thefollowing questions:

1. How intelligibly can a human hear the transmitted message from a Vocera© badge inthree different noise environments (Baseline = 20 dB, US Lab Module = 58 dB, RussianModule = 70.6 dB)?

2. How accurate is the Vocera© badge at recognizing voice commands in three differentnoise environments?

3. What body location (chest, upper arm, or shoulder) is optimal for speech intelligibilityand voice recognition accuracy of the Vocera© badge on a human in three differentnoise environments?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Results

1. The shoulder and chest locations resulted in higher intelligibility scores. TheRussian noise environment had the lowest intelligibility scores (Figure below).

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Baseline US Russian Baseline US Russian Baseline US Russian

Chest Upper Arm Shoulder

Badge Location and Speaker Noise Environment

Speech Intelligibility by Noise Environment and Badge Location

BaselineUSRussian

Listener  NoiseEnvironment

Conclusions

Based upon the findings of these studies, the human factors engineers were able todetermine the optimal location for the Vocera© B3000 badge to maximize the accuracyof communication for the astronaut using this device while living and working on theISS. Even though the shoulder provided a slightly preferred location for the user’sability to hear since the speaker was closest to their ears, the intelligibility and voicerecognition data demonstrated the best overall performance of the badge’s speakerand microphones while at the chest location. Future studies will investigate the use ofheadsets as well as adding an attachment to the badge which will direct the soundupwards while worn on the chest.

MethodsSpeech Intelligibility Study Voice Recognition Study

Participants ParticipantsThe JSC Human Test Subject Facility provided 7 males and 5 females that were prescreened for normal hearing.

A total of 10 (Five males and five females) completed the study.

Experimental Design Experimental DesignWhile utilizing male and female spoken words from the Modified Rhyme Test(MRT), the participants listened and were asked to identify nine words per condition. The conditions included the speakers and listeners in baseline, US, & Russian noise environments, and with the badge at the shoulder, chest, & upper arm locations.

The participants spoke nine commands (e.g., “Call”, “Broadcast a message”, “Invite”, and “Log out”) while in the baseline, US, & Russian noise environments, and with the badge at both the shoulder & chest locations.

Equipment EquipmentAnechoic and space vehicle simulation acoustic chambers at JSC’s Acoustics and Noise Control Lab.

Anechoic and reverberationchambers at JSC’s Audio Development Lab.

Vocera© B3000 badge

MRT Answer Sheet

2. The chest was the optimal location for achieving the highest voice recognitionaccuracy. The US and Baseline noise levels resulted in similar accuracy levelswhile the Russian noise environment experienced a decrease (Figure below).

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Chest ShoulderBadge Location

Voice Recognition Accuracy by Noise Environment and Badge Location 

Baseline(anechoic)Baseline(reverberation)US

Russian

3. The participants preferred the shoulder location for their ability to hear, howeverthey preferred the chest location in terms of the comfort and stability of the badge.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20120009451 2018-08-28T18:04:05+00:00Z

Recommended