+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Date post: 27-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: dinhnga
View: 219 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
52
ACP and HLB: The California Situation Victoria Hornbaker California Department of Food and Agriculture
Transcript
Page 1: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

ACP and HLB:The California Situation

Victoria Hornbaker

California Department of Food and Agriculture

Page 2: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• California's $2.5 billion citrus industry is at risk.

• Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Program and theCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture are havepartnered with the California citrus industry in acollaborative effort to help save our state’s citrus.

Dangerous Pest Threatens California Citrus

Page 3: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

17 member California Citrus Pest and Disease PreventionCommittee.

• Develop a statewide citrus specific pest and disease workplan that includes, but is not limited to, the following:– Outreach and education programs for residents, local communities,

groups, on the prevention of citrus pests and diseases.– Programs for surveying, detecting, analyzing, and treating pests and

diseases specific to citrus.

• Advise the Secretary on implementation of the work plan,including:– Annual assessment rate and annual budget.– Adoption of regulations consistent with the powers and duties of

the committee.

California Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Committee

Page 4: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Cooperative Program• Federal

– Unites States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

• State– California Department of Food & Agriculture (CDFA)– California Department of Pesticide Regulation (Cal EPA - CDPR)– Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (Cal EPA –

OEHHA)

• Local– County Agricultural Commissioners

• Industry– Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Program– California Citrus Research Board– Growers

• Residents– Across Southern and Central California

Page 5: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

California Citrus Layer

Page 6: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 7: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• ACP detected in Tijuana in June 2008• CDFA increased trapping/ visual surveys• 2008- San Diego and Imperial• 2009- Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura• 2010- Riverside and San Bernardino• 2012- Santa Barbara and Tulare• 2013- Kern and Fresno• 2014- San Luis Obispo, Santa Clara, Madera

and San Joaquin• 2015- San Benito, Stanislaus and San Mateo• 2016 - Kings

Page 8: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 9: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• Detection Trapping

• Visual Survey

• Delimitation Trapping

• Treatment

• Quarantine

• Outreach

CDFA Activities

Page 10: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Trapping

Detection TrappingTrap Density: Five to 16 traps/squaremile.Trap Servicing Interval: Every two tofour weeks.

Delimitation TrappingTrap Density: 100 traps per squaremile in a 1.5 mile radius, to form anine square mile delimitation area.Trap Servicing Interval: Traps will beserviced weekly for two months.After that serviced monthly for twoyears past the identification date.

Page 11: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

COLLECTION SITES – 7,708

ACP COLLECTIONS – 10,372(Some sites have been collected more than once)

ADULTS COLLECTED – 66,100

NYMPHS COLLECTED – 15,568

SITES NEGATIVE FOR HLB – 9,444(Or undetermined)

RESULTS NOT IN – 928

Commercial Grove Trapping

Page 12: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• ACP detection sites and adjacent properties treated withhomeowner consent

• Foliar treatment with cyfluthrin (Tempo SC Ultra)

• Soil drench with imidacloprid (Merit 2F)

Urban Treatments

Page 13: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Types of Treatment

Voluntary Area-wide Treatment

• CDFA treats residential properties 400 meters aroundcommercial properties

– Only if 75% of commercial citrus is treated

• Two applications per year

Voluntary Treatments in Response to ACP

• 100-400 meters around detection site

Mandatory Treatments in Response to HLB

• 800 meters around detection site

Page 14: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• US/Mexico Border

– Maintain 2 mile trapping buffer and 400 meter treatments.

• Generally infested areas.

– Implement Area-wide treatments where feasible and growerparticipation levels are high.

– No treatment in areas where Area-wide protocol is notfeasible, focus on HLB survey and biocontrol.

In response to HLB detections all properties within 800meters will be treated.

Southern California Update

Page 15: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Areawide Treatments

• Growers in the following counties areparticipating in voluntary areawide treatments.

– San Diego

– Imperial

– Riverside

– San Bernardino

– Ventura

– Santa Barbara

Page 16: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• In any area where ACP has not been previously detectedor where ACP has been detected at low densities.

• For single ACP detections not within 1.5 miles ofcommercial citrus, all properties within 100 meters willbe surveyed and treated.

• If the find is within 1.5 miles of commercial citrus, or ifmultiple ACP are detected within six months of eachother, the survey and treatment area will be 400 meters.

• In response to HLB detections all properties within 800meters will be treated.

• Begin identifying areawide management areas.

Central Valley – Northern California Update

Page 17: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Responsive Treatments

• The CDFA is currently responding to finds in thefollowing counties.– Kern

– Tulare

– Madera

– San Luis Obispo

– Santa Clara

– Fresno

– Kings

– San Benito

Page 18: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 19: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

CDFA Biocontrol Mass Production

238,000 Tamarixia reared in2013

1,124,091 reared in 2014 and931,522 released

1,668,699 Tamarixia and125,123 Diaphorencyrtusreleased in 2015

340,952 Tamarixia and 80,959Diaphorencyrtus released so farthis year

Page 20: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Biological Control Agent Releases

April, 2016

Page 21: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Biological Control Activities - May 2016

Cal Poly InsectaryConstruction Underway!

Cal Poly GlasshouseOn loan – renovations

underway

Page 22: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

HLB Core Area Trapping andTreatment

San Gabriel

• Treatment: (Tempo Only) January 11 - January 29,2016

• Trap Counts:• February 177 ACP trapped in the core area

• March over 4,200 ACP trapped in the core area

Hacienda Heights

• Treatment: (Tempo only) January 19 - February 10, 2016

• Trap Counts:• February 258 ACP trapped in the core area

• March over 12,500 ACP trapped in the core area

Page 23: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

HLB SURVEY

• All of round 2 risk-based surveys are 100% complete

• Program is prepping the next round of risk-basedsurvey

• Program is revisiting all sites that had inconclusivePCR results for ACP and/or Plant samples.

• Continue to proactively sample ACP for the bacteria.

• Program continues survey in the HLB quarantine areaand intensive survey in the core 800 meter areaaround each HLB detection.

Page 24: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 25: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 26: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

HACIENDAHEIGHTS Cycle1 (Jan-Feb) Cycle2 (Mar-Apr)

Cycle3 (May-June) Cycle4 (July-Aug) Cycle5 (Sept-Oct)

Cycle6(Nov-Dec)

RequiredSites to Visit

Per Cycle 673 648 637 724 655 659

Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4 Cycle 5 Cycle 6

Survey Dates 1/12/15-2/22/16 PENDING

11/9/15-12/29/15

Number ofSites Visited 508 603

PlantSamplesCollected 232 311

ACP SamplesCollected 429 540

SitesNegative forACP/ PlantSamples 39 36

2016 HLB CLUSTER SURVEY HACIENDAHEIGHTS

Page 27: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 28: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Hacienda Heights HLB Find 2012

• One positive tree found on a residential property inHacienda Heights (LA County)

• The positive tree had over 19 illegal pomelo andlemon grafts

• Homeowner voluntarily allowed for the removal ofthe diseased tree

• Area has been continually monitored for over 3years without a subsequent find

Page 29: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

San Gabriel HLB Detections

• The initial tree (kumquat) was found as a result ofthe CDFA Risk-Based Huanglongbing (HLB) Survey.Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) were collected from thefind site that tested in the inconclusive range, so thelead diagnostician at the lab requested a resample ofthe property.

• Plant tissue from the tree was collected during theresample and the plant tissue collected during thefollow-up sample tested PCR positive.

• Nine additional trees were confirmed from the samearea. All positive trees were removed.

San Gabriel HLB Finds 2015

Page 30: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Kumquat Tree

Page 31: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Mandarin TreeMandarin Tree Mexican Lime

Page 32: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Mandarin Tree Calamondin Tree

Page 33: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Mandarin Tree Mandarin Tree

Page 34: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 35: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Mandarin Tree Orange Tree

Page 36: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Mandarin Tree Orange Tree

Page 37: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

La Puente Clas Positive ACP 2016• In January 2016 the CDFA began resampling the

areas around the Hacienda Heights and San GabrielHLB finds.

• On 1/6/16 the CDFA lab detected Clas from an ACPsample (9 adults) from the La Puente area of LosAngeles County.

• This find initiated an 800 meter survey of all hostplants and any ACP collected.– Properties Surveyed: 1837

– Plant Samples: 1072

– ACP Samples: 1030

– No Host: 642

Page 38: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

San Gabriel HLB Finds 2016

• On 2/1/16 the CDFA Lab confirmed 2 trees(kumquat and orange) within a block of the July2015 HLB cluster.

• Additional survey was triggered to include allhost plants within 800 meters of the find sites.

• On 2/11/16 a third tree was confirmed positive(kumquat).

• Survey and treatment areas expanded due tothis find.

• All have been removed.

Page 39: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

• In early March four trees from threeproperties were confirmed HLB positive.

– One property with a lemon tree.

– One property with a orange and a lemon trees.

– One property with a kumquat tree.

– One property with an orange tree

– All have been removed.

San Gabriel HLB Finds 2016

Page 40: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Two trees were confirmed HLB positive in April

– One on April 8th an orange/kumquat hybrid.

– One on April 18th was a lemon that expanded outthe survey and treatment area to the south.

– Both were removed.

May 16th a grapefruit tree was confirmedpositive.

– Tree removal is scheduled for Saturdayquarantine area remains the same.

San Gabriel HLB Finds 2016

Page 41: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Site 2, San GabrielOrange

Site 1, San GabrielKumquat

Site 3, San GabrielKumquat Site 4, San Gabriel

Lemon

Page 42: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Site 5, San GabrielKumquat

Site 5, San GabrielLemon

Site 6, San GabrielKumquat

Site 8, San GabrielTrifoliate Kumquat

Page 43: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

LA County HLB Samples 2015-2016

• Total ACP samples collected from SG,including expansion areas – 12,000.

• Total plant samples collected from SG,including expansion areas - 18,000

• Confirmed positive ACP samples - 4 SanGabriel and 1 from La Puente

• Confirmed positive plant samples - 21 treesfrom 18 properties

Page 44: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Figure 3. Number of samples submitted for HLB testing per year from 2008 to 2016. Cumulative ACP and plant sample totalfor nine years is 321,789 in which 35% of the total are plant and 65% are ACP.

Year PLANT ACP Total

2008-09 2209 1923 4132

2010 9111 3527 12638

2011 14233 8845 23078

2012 14644 32843 47487

2013 14402 31442 45844

2014 13640 29308 42948

2015 26897 80105 107002

2016 16919 21741 38660

Total 112055 209734 321789 ← Cumulative sample total

Page 45: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Figure 2. 2016 total plant and ACP samples submitted by county.

Page 46: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Outreach and Education

Page 47: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)
Page 48: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Current Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP)Regulations Overview

• Single ACP detection triggers a quarantine of minimum5 mile radius.

• Request for full county quarantine must come fromCounty Agricultural Commissioner.

• Citrus commodities are prohibited movement from anACP quarantine area except under permit.

• Free movement allowed to the packinghouse if withinthe same quarantine area.

• Citrus commodity shipments must be free of stems andleaves or moved under “spray and move” option topackinghouse outside of an ACP quarantine area.

Page 49: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Establishment of Quarantines

Wasco Quarantine

Page 50: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Additional Items

Page 51: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Neglected/Abandoned Orchards

• The program supports the removal of neglected/abandoned groves.

• San Bernardino County Agricultural Commissioner continues tohave good response to letters they sent to the owners of apparentlyabandoned groves. The removals continue.

• The Madera County abandoned grove where the latest ACP wasfound was treated. Reportedly, the grove will be removed withinthe next 18 months. Stevie McNeil and Sylvie will continue tomonitor this situation.

• San Diego County is selecting vendors to remove abandoned grovesshould that be necessary, if the owners fail to act after the dueprocess is exhausted. When they are in place, they intend to movequickly to notify the owners.

Page 52: ACP and HLB: The California Situation (Citrus)

Recommended