Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | shavonne-obrien |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
AcroJet--FinalAkujuaobi, Timothy
Dingyi ChenHuiliang Su
Jing AiWen Zhang
Contents of PresentationProject Description
What is GMPLS
GELS Test Bed
Juniper & Transmode Test Bed
Marketing Analysis
Future Work
Who we are?
TSLabProject Team – AcroJet TeamCoach – Markus HidellChampion: Peter Sjödin
Acreo AB Principal – Anders Gavler
Project Description
Purpose: To establish a multilayer test bed
with optical cross-connects, Ethernet switches and IP routers.
Goals:To establish a unique test bed
environmentTo analyze the potential targets
for such a test bedFinal GMPLS Test Bed
GELS Test Bed
Juniper &
Transmode
Forwarding table calculated with Such complex algorithms as Longest prefix matching
IP Packet Switching Paradigm
Header Payload
Label Switching Paradigm
L
Header Label Payload
IP Packet VS Label Switching Paradigm
Forwarding done based on Labels inserted into packets at ingress Router into MPLS cloud
LSR
LSR
LSR
LSR LER
LSR
LSR
LSR
LSR
LER
MPLS CONCEPT
LSP PathLabel Path
IP Control Plane
IP Router IP RouterOpticalSwitch
OpticalSwitchOXC OXCData
Plane
LSR LSR LSR LSR LSR LSROSPF-TE
RSVP-TE
Layer n LSP
Layer n-1 LSP
Layer n-2 LSP
GMPLS CONTROL ANDDATA PLANE CONCEPT
Advantages of GMPLSUnified Control Plane
Automatic/Dynamic Provisioning of Bandwidth and Capacity
Optical Virtual Private Networks
Open Standards Support
GELS Test BedAkujuaobi, TimothyHuiliang SuWen Zhang
VE2
244
E2E1
E3
E0
VPCE
E0
E2
E1
VE3
245
E0
E3
E1E0
VR1251
E2 E1
E3
E0VE1
243
E0E1 VR2
252
E1
E0
VR3253
VN11 VN22
VN33
VN12
VN23VN13
VN0
ETHERNET/SWITCHCORE TESTBED
NAT
GMPLS Protocols / SoftwareDragon Software
OSPF-TE Routing protocol modified with TE extensions
RSVP-TE Signaling and Resource Reservation with TE
extensions
Challenges EncounteredCustomized Dragon Software
Bugs
Minimal documentations
Learning threshold for new concepts
Juniper & TransmodeTest BedJing AiDingyi Chen
T&J Test Bed
Juniper M-Series Transmode 3000
Juniper & Tansmode Test Bed Overview
M10
M5
M7
KISTA KTH
M5
VÄLLINGBY
KTH-2KTH-1
KTH Node D
ge-0/3/0Te-id:28679If-id:57255
108-8Te-id:0x1026cRx-id:0x10208
102-2Tx-id:0x10266Rx-id:0x10202
101-1Tx-id:0x10265Rx-id:0x10201
te-ed-020
te-ed-010
PPP In-band Control CH
GbE TE Links
Label Switch Paths
In-band PPP Links
Fast Ethernet
M5 Node E
Ge-0/1/0:Te-id:30759If-id:55207
102-2Tx-id:0x10266Rx-id:0x10202
106-6Tx-id:0x1026aRx-id:0x10206
101-1Tx-id:0x10265Rx-id:0x10201
Kista Node B
te-ab-030
ge-1/3/0Te-id:29703If-id:57271 te-ab-130
M10 Node A
Ge-0/2/0:Te-id:30791If-id:56231
Conclusion IP connectivity of the whole testbed
GMPLS communication between Transmode nodes.
GMPLS communication between Juniper
nodes.
Problem and Solution
A little lack of real-time documentations and technique support
Two systems with incompatible implementation standards
Marketing
Analysisof
GMPLS
SWOT Analysis
Traditional Service Model of Network Operator
Service Model of Network Operator with GMPLS
Future Work
Integration ConceptLSR
LSR
LSR
LSR
LSR
LSR
Juniper
Juniper
Switch
Switch
OXC OXC
Switch Controler
Switch Controler
Switch Controler
Switch Controler
Switch Controler
M10
M5
M7
KISTA
Vällingby
KTH
KTH2
M5
KTH1
Final Network Diagram