+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende,...

ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende,...

Date post: 06-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 54, JANUARY.FEBRUARY, 1969 TWO-AMPHIBOLE ASSEMBLAGES IN THE SYSTEM ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE_ GLAUCOPHANE 1 Connor.rs KrnrN, ln., Departmentof Geological Sciences, H ara ar d U niv er sity, Carnbrid ge, M as s ac hus elt s 02 I 38 . Aesrnlcr This study gives electron probe analyses and optical descriptions for twenty-two amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende- glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs which are intermediate in composi- tion between hornblende and glaucophane. One pair is quoted from the literature. fn actinolite-hornblende pairs the hornblende always has the lower Mg/(MgfFe) ratio. The one hornblende-hornblende pair shows a similar fractionation. In actinolite- glaucophane pairs glaucophane has lower Mg/(MgfFe) as well as lower Si/(Si+Al) ratios. rn four out of six hornblende-glaucophane pairs the glaucophane has a smaller Mg/(MgfFe) ratio than the hornblende, whereas in two pairs this is reversed. The Si/(Si+Al) fractionation between these two highly aluminous phases is very irregular. Four pairs, which consist of glaucophane and hornblende-glaucophane compositions, have Mg/(MgfFe) and Si/(Si-|AI) fractionation patterns very different from those observed in the other pairs. In a few of the 2-amphibole assemblages homogeneous, separate grains of the two amphiboles coexist in random intergrowth, but the majority of textures show complex zonation and patches of the two amphiboles in composite grains. The contact between the two amphiboles has been found to be optically and chemically sharp in every 2- amphibole assemblage, except one. These 2-amphibole assemblages are evidence for the probable existence of miscibility gaps in the system actinolite-hornblende-glaucophane at relatively low temperatures. The majority of the rocks in which these assemblages occur are part of the greenschist or epidote amphibolite facies, and the glaucophane schist facies, all of which were formed at relativelv low temoeratures. I*t*ooo"tro* Many studies have dealt with the extent of various chemical sub- stitutions in the clinoamphiboles of tremolite-actinolite ICaz(Mg,Fe)r- Sisorr(OH,F)21, hornblende [(Na,Ca)s-s(Mg,Fe2+)a(Al,Fe3+)SioAlzOzz- (OH,F)rl and glaucophane-riebeckite INarM&Alr(Siooz)(OH,F)z to Na2Fe32+Fe2t+(Sirorr)(oH,F):] compositions. Some of these studies are basedupon collections of large numbers of chemical analyses for green, blue-greenand blue clinoamphiboles (Kunitz, 1930, Hallimond, 1943, and Sundius, 7946), and other studies are based upon the occurrence and analysis of two or more optically distinct Na-Ca clinoamphiboles in one assemblage (for references, seeTable 1). In his study of the hornblende "family" Kunitz (1930) presents analyses for several amphiboles that are intermediate in composition between tremolite-actinolite and glaucophane. Similar examples of two "riebeckite-tremolite" compositions are given in Klein (1966). Such 1 Mineralogical Contribution No. 459, Harvard University. 212
Transcript
Page 1: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 54, JANUARY.FEBRUARY, 1969

TWO-AMPHIBOLE ASSEMBLAGES IN THE SYSTEMACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE_ GLAUCOPHANE 1

Connor.rs KrnrN, ln., Department of Geological Sciences,H ara ar d U niv er sity, C arnbrid ge, M as s ac hus elt s 0 2 I 3 8 .

AesrnlcrThis study gives electron probe analyses and optical descriptions for twenty-two

amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs which are intermediate in composi-tion between hornblende and glaucophane. One pair is quoted from the literature.

fn actinolite-hornblende pairs the hornblende always has the lower Mg/(MgfFe)ratio. The one hornblende-hornblende pair shows a similar fractionation. In actinolite-glaucophane pairs glaucophane has lower Mg/(MgfFe) as well as lower Si/(Si+Al)ratios. rn four out of six hornblende-glaucophane pairs the glaucophane has a smallerMg/(MgfFe) ratio than the hornblende, whereas in two pairs this is reversed. TheSi/(Si+Al) fractionation between these two highly aluminous phases is very irregular.Four pairs, which consist of glaucophane and hornblende-glaucophane compositions, haveMg/(MgfFe) and Si/(Si-|AI) fractionation patterns very different from those observedin the other pairs.

In a few of the 2-amphibole assemblages homogeneous, separate grains of the twoamphiboles coexist in random intergrowth, but the majority of textures show complexzonation and patches of the two amphiboles in composite grains. The contact betweenthe two amphiboles has been found to be optically and chemically sharp in every 2-amphibole assemblage, except one. These 2-amphibole assemblages are evidence for theprobable existence of miscibility gaps in the system actinolite-hornblende-glaucophane atrelatively low temperatures. The majority of the rocks in which these assemblages occurare part of the greenschist or epidote amphibolite facies, and the glaucophane schist facies,all of which were formed at relativelv low temoeratures.

I*t*ooo"tro*

Many studies have dealt with the extent of various chemical sub-stitutions in the clinoamphiboles of tremolite-actinolite ICaz(Mg,Fe)r-Sisorr(OH,F)21, hornblende [(Na,Ca)s-s(Mg,Fe2+)a(Al,Fe3+)SioAlzOzz-(OH,F)rl and glaucophane-riebeckite INarM&Alr(Siooz)(OH,F)z toNa2Fe32+Fe2t+(Sirorr)(oH,F):] compositions. Some of these studies arebased upon collections of large numbers of chemical analyses for green,blue-green and blue clinoamphiboles (Kunitz, 1930, Hall imond, 1943,and Sundius, 7946), and other studies are based upon the occurrenceand analysis of two or more optically distinct Na-Ca clinoamphibolesin one assemblage (for references, see Table 1).

In his study of the hornblende "family" Kunitz (1930) presentsanalyses for several amphiboles that are intermediate in compositionbetween tremolite-actinolite and glaucophane. Similar examples of two"riebeckite-tremolite" compositions are given in Klein (1966). Such

1 Mineralogical Contribution No. 459, Harvard University.

212

Page 2: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TWO.A M P H I BOLE ASS EM B LAGES

Tarlr 1. Lrtnnatunn Rnroms ol Conxtsrrnc Allprrrtor,rs rN rur RewGBoF AcrrNolrrE-HopNnr,rNon-Sooruu AMprrrgoLB ColrlosrrroNs

213

Coexisting actinolite and hornblende

Reference, rock type and location Description

Comfton (1958). IIafic greenstone (albite-actinolite-hornblende,epidote chlorite-leucoxene calcite) Bidwell Bar region, Calif

Actinolite abruptly overgrown by green hornblende. Sharpboundary between the two amphiboles Electron probeanalyses are given in Table 2 (2-3) Compton's paper givescomplete analyses for two amphiboles that were not inphysical contact

Dunham (pus conru,) Q\artz dioilte(q uartz-mi crocl i ne .plagioclase-biot i re-

hornblende-actinolite) Blodgett ForestPluton, El Dorado County, Calif

Colorless actinolite and green hornblende coexist in single

amphibole grains The margins betwe€n the 2 amphiboles

are o{ten irregular but sharp Chemical analyses given in

Table 2 (2-4\

Miyas hiro (1958) Actinolite-epidotechlorite-plagioclase-hornblende schist, withmrnor amounts of quartz, calcite and biotite(Zone "B"). Gosaisyo-Takanuki district,Abukuma Plateau, Japan

Blue-green hornblende occurs as rims around actinolitecrystals, sometimes as patches within actinolite crystalsand sometimes as independent crystals In all cases theboundary betrveen the 2 amphiboles is sharp Checks forsharpness were made with tilted sections on the universa Istage

,Seilsaui (1 95 6) "Plagioclase porphyrite,consisting of plagioclase (An5-6), biotite,hornblende, actinolite and epidote Tampereschist belt, Finland.

Blue-green hornblende with almost colorless or faintlygreenish kernels The two difierent parts of the amphibole

crystals are homoaxial Seitsaari gives complete analyses

for the dark and lighter colored amphibole fractions

Shid,o and. Miyashi.ro (.1959). Schists similarto those given above under Miyashiro, andepidiorites (hornblende-chlorite-epidote-oligoclase schist) Irom Aberfeldy, Perthshire,Scotland

Hornblende occurs in parallel grorvth with, as patches

within, and also as rims around the actinolite. The bound

ary between the two amphiboles is ahvays sharp Sharp-

ness of the contact was checked in several samples with

tilted thin sections Electron probe analyses oJ one such

occurrence are given in Table 2 (2 2)

Wisman (1931) "Abnormal epidiodte, (auralitized gabbro consisting of labradorite,augite, biotite, and 2 types of amphibole)_Southwest Highlands, Scotland

Describes hornblende of variable color in an epidiorite;

sometimes it shows a light green kernel with a blue-green

rim The description suggests actinolite and hornblende

compositions.

Coexisting hornblende (or actinolite) and Na amphibole, and zoned Na-amphiboles

Banno (1958) Glaucophane schists, Omidistrict, Niigata, Japan.

Colorless actinolite and blue green glaucophane parts in

single crystals Usually the cores of the crystals are actin-olite, the rims glaucophane lIowever, the reverse is alsoobserved

Bloram (1960) Crossite anphibolite com-posed of hornblende, crossite, epidote, al-bite, sphene, apatite and garnet Girvan-Ballantrae Complex, South Ayrshire,Scotland.

Hornblende mantled by crossite rims Complete hornblende

and crossite analyses are given by Bloxam The Ca-content

of the crossite is probably high because of epidote andgreen hornblende contamination (Bloxam, personal

communicat ion),

BorS Q956) Glaucophane schists near

Healdsburg, Calif.Hornblende in cores of glaucophane crystals Borg inter-prets these occurrences as glaucophane replacement ol

hornblende

Dudley (1 967 ). Glaucophane schists,Tiburon Peninsula, Marin County, Calif.

Coexisting actinolite and glaucophane; as zones in single

crystals and as separate crystals

Page 3: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

2t4 CORNELIS KLEIN

Taer,n 1. (Conhinued)

Reference, rock type and location Description

Ernst,et otr (pets-c,mn ) Glaucophaneschistsfrom Tiburon Peninsula and Goat I\4ountain,Calif and the Shirataki district, Shikoku,

Japan

Actinolite and glaucophane coexist in parts oI single

crystals, and as separate crystals. Electron probe analyses

are given for six such pairs, and conventional analyses for

one other pair

Iuao (1939). Monzonite and doleriteNayosi district, Sakhalin, Japan

Izoasaki (1 960a) Magnesioriebeckite-

barroisite-Mg-rich glaucophane-garnet-

muscovitepiedmontite-aegidne albite-

quartz schists Eastern Shikoku, Japan

Iuasaki (1960b) "Quartz schistsn similar tothose described above Eastern Shikoku,

Japan

Zoned crystals with hastingsite cores and arfvedsonite

rims with a transitional layer between them Barkevikite

crystals rimmed by brorvn-green hornblende The contact

between the hornblende and the barkevikite appears to

be sharp

Three layer zoning in amphiboles: a nearly colorless core

(X4g rich glaucophane), colored mantle (magnesioriebec-

kite) and a rim of green amphibole A complete chemical

analysis is given lor the magnesioriebeckite

Barroisite rims arcunC glaucophane cores (barroisite is

similar in composition to hornblende with a large Na

component, Deer eI al', 1963) Also description of mag-

nesioriebeckite cores with barroisite rims

Iwasaki (1963) Glaucophane schists andmagnesioriebeckite-Mn-garnet piedmontitestilpnomelane-quartz schists Kdtu Bizanarear eastern Shikoku, Japan

Gives examples of many types of zonation: actinolite

(core)-glaucophane (rim); glaucophane (core)-actinolite

(rim) ; glaucophane (core)- barroisite (rim) ; magnesiorie-

beckite (core) barroisite (rim); magnesioriebeckite (core)-

actinolite (rim); barroisite (core)- glaucophane (rim);

barroisite (core)- magnesioriebeckite (rim) In all cases

the boundaries between tbe 2 amphiboles were lound to

be sharp Electron probe analyses of similar occurrences

are siven in Tables 4 (4-3) and 5 (5-2, 5-3)

Lee et al (1966). Glaucophane schists,

Cazadero area, Sonoma County, Calif

Miyashiro and. Iwasoki (1957) Garnet-

aegirine-amphibole-muscovite-quartz schist

with minor hematite and apatite Bizan,

Shikoku, Japan

Actinolite and glaucophane are present as distinct in-

dividual grains, but more olten a single amphibole grain

may consist oJ both actinolite and glaucophane Complete

conventional analyses for the 2 amphiboles are given

Detailed description of zoned magnesioriebeckite of which

the core is colorless, the rim blue and pleochroic. The

boundary between the rim and core is said to be sharp. A

complete analysis is given for the blue rim material

(magnesioriebeckite) and the cote is stated to be a mag-

nesioriebeckite witb less Fe, on the basis of optical

properties

Van der Plas ud. Iliigi 11961).l|tretamoryhicophiolite consisting of epidote, magnetiteand blue-green amphibole, cut by an albitevein \rals, Switzerland.

A Ierrian sodium amphibole with dark blue

light blue rims Electron probe analyses are

Table 5 (5-5)

cores and

Slven rn

YoSi (1953') Monzonite and syeniteMorutu district, Sakhalin, Japan

tlastingsite rimmed by arfvedsonite The transition zone

between the two amphiboles appears to be gradational'

intermediate compositions show that under certain geological conditions

a continuous chemical series exists between actinolite and riebeckite-

glaucophane. Under different geologic conditions, however, a chemical

Page 4: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TWO-AMPIIIBOLE ASSEMBLAGES 215

discontinuity, or miscibility gap, may exist between tremolite-actinoliteand sodium amphiboles. Sundius (1947), in his study of the solid solu-tion relations in the amphibole group shows that, on the basis of thechemistry of a large number of Na- and Na-Ca-amphiboles, a "zene ofunmixing exists between the alkaline and lime-alkaline hornblendes,though the unmixing area mav be restricted" (p.35).He furthermoreshows, also on the basis of many analyses, that if there is a chemicaldiscontinuity between actinolite and hornblende compositions, such"an area of unmix ing cannot be very great" (p.33) .Hal l imond (1943,p. 74) suggests, on the basis of a collection of 196 hornblende analyses,that there may be a break in composition between the tremolite-actinoliteseries which grades into ttcommon hornblende" and pargasitic horn-blende with a notable content of alkalis [Idealized pargasite composi-tion: NaCazMg4(Al,Fe3+)SioAlrorr(OH,F)r; Deer et al., 19631.

Many authors have described coexistences of two or more clino-amphiboles whose compositions are within the actinolite-hornblende-sodium amphibole group. Table 1 gives some of the references and shortdescriptions of such occurrences. The most frequently described textureis that of zonation of one amphibole by the other. Several authors,however, also describe occurrences of separate, individual crystals ofboth coexisting amphiboles. The majority of the amphibole identifica-tions in Table 1 are based upon optical study and only very few chemicalanalyses are available for the two members of the described pairs.Compton (1958) gives complete analyses for a hornblende and anactinolite, however, the analyzed samples were obtained from specimensin which the two amphiboles were not in direct contact. Bloxam (1960)gives complete analyses for coexisting hornblende and crossite. Thecrossite analysis may be too high in CaO because of epidote and horn-blende impurity in the analysis separate (Bloxam, pers. comm.). Seit-saari (1956) gives analyses for the light and dark colored fractions of anactinolite-hornblende association. These analyses were probablv notmade on highly purified separates because of the difficulty in separatingthe hornblende rims from the actinolitic cores. Lee et al. (1966) givecomplete conventional analyses for coexisting actinolite and glauco-phane, and W. G. Ernst, Y. Seki, H. Onuki and M. C. Gilbert (pers.comm.) give electron probe analyses for six occurrences of actinoliteand glaucophane, and conventional analyses for an additional actinolite-glaucophane pair.

It is the purpose of this study to provide further quantitative chemicalevidence for the existence of compositional discontinuities betweenactinolite, hornblende and sodium amphiboles, under certain geologicconditions.

Page 5: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

2t6 CORNELIS KLEIN

CnBurcar- Awar-vsns

Chemical analyses were made after detailed optical study had revealed the presence of

two optically distinct amphiboles. A few samples which showed difierent pleochroism

in different parts of grains, were subsequently proven to be homogeneous in composition

through electron probe analysis of the various differently colored areas. In these instances

difierences in optical orientations, rather than changes in composition were the cause for

the difference in pleochroic colors.

Analyses of twenty-one two-amphibole pairs were made with an electron microprobe

(Applied Research Laboratories-EMX) on carbon-coated thin sections. The analyses

of one additional pair (assemblage 2 1) were made on handpicked grains mounted in a

carbon-coated polished section. The conditions of analysis were similar to those described

in detail in Klein (1968). The instrumental conditions and reference standards were the

same, except for the calibration curve for NarO. The NazO curve given in Klein (1968)

ranges from 0 to 5 weight percent NazO. For this study, in which glaucophane-t1pe amphi-

boles were analyzed, the calibration curve needed to be extended to higher NazO values.

Unable to Iocate homogeneous analyzed sodiurn amphiboles, I used two homogeneous,

analyzed aegirines for the high Na2O range of the standard curve. The analyses for these

aegirines (no. 17.{-10.37 weight percent NazO and no. 158-6'19 weight percent Na2O)

are given in Klein (1966). Because of the very close similarity in matrix between these

clinopyroxenes and the sodium amphiboles, the plToxene NazO values could indeed be

used for the extension of the sodium amphibole calibration curve. A TiOz calibration curve

was based upon one analyzed gedrite with 0.29 weight percent TiOz, and two analyzed

hornblendes containing 0.38 and 1.90 weight percent TiO2 respectively.

The majority of the amphiboles in this study were analyzed for nine elements. As the

ARL electron probe allows simultaneous analysis of a maximum of three elements, the

samples had to be introduced and relocated in the electron probe a minimum of three

times. In order to facilitate location and relocation in the instrument, the analysis area

on each of the thin sections was marked and this same area was photographed on a bench

microscope at 30X and 300X magnification. As it is very difficult, even with the marking

of the analysis areas and the accompanying photographs of the area, to locate the electron

beam accurately by means of the optical system only, the X-ray intensity of Ca-Ka or in

some cases Fe-Ka was monitored throughout the analysis procedure by means of a re-

corder or audioamplifier read-out. The combination of optical observation of the amphi-

bole grains in thin section with the graphical or audio read-out of the Ca-Ka or Fe-Ka

X-ray intensity made it possible to locate and relocate accurately the chemicaliy and optic-

ally distinct parts of a single amphibole grain or of a two-amphiboie assemblage made up of

separate grains. Ca-Ka or Fe-Kd radiation was selected for continual monitoring because

the Ca or Fe contents, or both, are greatly different in the coexisting amphiboles in this

study. The continual monitoring of the Ca-Ka or Fe-Ka X-ray output also prevented the

analysis of erroneous intermediate compositions which are the result of the geometry of the

intergrowth oI two phases rather than of their true chemical composition.

The maximum relative error in the weight percent values for SiO2, FeO, CaO and MnO

is estimated to be approximately *2-3 percent of the amount present. The maximum

relative error in the Na2O, KzO, AlzOs, MgO and TiOr values is probably about *5 per-

cent. The anhydrous totals for the electron probe analyses in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 range

from 95.3 to 99.7 weight percent) with the majority of the totals between 96.5 and 98'0

weight percent. These totals provide an approximate indication of the completeness of

the analyses, but they cannot be used for an estimate of the HrO content of the amphi-

boles because Fe661 has been recalculated as Feo only. As the Fe:o: component is unknown

in these analyses and as this component is a very major one in the sodium amphiboles, it

Page 6: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TWO-A M P II I BO LE AS S EM B LACES

has been impossible to recalculate the weight percent figures on the basis of 23 oxygens oron the basis of a flxed number of cations (e.g. 15). Furthermore, because of the absence ofFe2O3 values, it is impossible to make nomenclature distinctions in the sodium amohibolesand in the hornblendes which are dependent upon a knowledge of the Fe2+/Fei+ ratio.All sodium amphiboles in this study have a high AlzOs content which ranges from about 6to 12 weight percent and all of these are referred to as glaucophane. rt is possible, how-ever, that some of these would turn out to be crossite or ferroglaucophane if the Fe2+fFes+ratio were known. Similarly no detailed nomenclature distinctions were made in the horn-blende or actinolite analyses. All predominantly ca-rich and Al-rich amphiboles are re-ferred to as hornblende, whereas amphiboles with a high ca-content and a relatively lowAl2O3 content (less than 4.8 weight percent) are referred to as actinolite.

CorxrsrrNc Acrruorr . rB AND HoRNBLENDE CoMposrrroNs

Table 2 gives the electron probe analyses for seven pairs of coexistingactinolite and hornblende. The analyses are arranged in order of de-creasing Mg/(Mgf Fe) ratio of the actinolite. Four of these 2-amphibolerocks are metadolerites or metabasalts described by Compton (1955and 1958) from the Bidwell Bar region, California. Another such as-semblage (no. 2-2) was described by Shido and Miyashiro (1959) fromthe epidiorites in scotland. Assemblage no. 2-1 is from an amphibolitein Madagascar described by Lacroix (1939) and no. 2-4 is part of aquartz-diorite in Eldorado County, California, described by A. C. Dun-ham (pers. comm.). Detailed assemblage descriptions, locations andreferences are given at the bottom of Table 2.

The four 2-amphibole occurrences of the Bidwell Bar region are verysimilar in texture. The hornblende occurs as irregular patches within,and as irregular zones around coarse grained, euhedral to subhedralactinolite grains. The hornblende is highly pleochroic from colorless todark green whereas the actinolite is almost colorless with a faint greentinge' rn some grains actinolite is the most abundant phase whereas inothers hornblende makes r.rp the greater part. The hornblende-actinoliteinterface is always sharp optically; electron beam scanning across suchinterfaces with the electron probe has confirmed this sharpness.

The two amphiboles in the epidiorite (assemblage 2-2) show texturesvery similar to those described above. Large, subhedral hornblendecrystals show colorless actinolite zones and patches which are randomlydistributed throughout the host crystals. The contacts between the twoamphiboles are optically sharp.

The textural relationships of the two amphiboles in the quartz-diorite(assemblage 2-4) arc practically identical with those of the epidioriteoccurrence. Again large, subhedral crystals show irregular zones andpatches of hornblende in actinolite, and vice versa.

The two amphiboles in the amphibolite from Tsintbolovolo, Madagas-car (assemblage 2-1) are texturally very different from the occurrences

217

Page 7: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

CORN]'LIS KLEIN

N @ €

@ o o4 € 0 0

O \ : 4

m $ N

@ o N € n c ) r N o l 6 4 e < 1

+ O : a O o o o : O l € o . o r< 1 i N l o \ o @ r

o o c o 4 + + - € N l o N i -: c ) + \ O O o - O O l € o . O O4 c } \ 4 O \ O \

lfl

N

N

(,?

rI

N

r N : \ o N N + 1 o N 1 \ o € N Or , o o c o o - o - o i N - t r -+ | o . t a & &

N O 4 - \ O O \ N 4 O o N \ O r

N O - \ O O + - O O r O N N Nt \ r a o

H O 4 + 1 < r O \ O \ : : I S

* d o ' r d o o i - j d l o i+ o

1 a \ q 9 q n 1 ? aa o o N o \ o o o o 1 0 0n t o ,

a i € \ o 4 4 + 1 O O l N N d r 4

O - N \ O O H F H - t N 4 O q+ l o n i o €

r N * 3 4 4 C O N c ) l d r d r < t 0 o. l+ o s - o + N O o t N o \ N qq l O \ \ O O ' a

4 N O \ N \ O 6 N € < 1 l 3 : + r 4

$ i o : ; d d d d i s i l D s

" ? c " 1 a q a c t : l a n 1 :e o o o l o r o s o o

l S F A B

O \ o Do r + rN C O @

N O O N N : @ O \ N l \ OH O € O O \ O O O O l Nb t o \

N i 6 @ N \ O N N C ) l *N o H € o € : o o I @4 t o \

0 1 . \ O N N @ N \ l : o O O N

o o j o o o \ o H - : o . € € -< i ! ! | O \ N N €

o 6 . N + N c ) N 4 J r c ) N 4 \ o

; e ; o i d d o i d : l d i o i j ;4 c N I l a r o \ o

6 rtE=io+<

rxdaQ o . .o C* - > d +' ;EiESgE:;' ;:A>oa

H

N

\oI

N

r

IN

N

H+r

IN

IN

roI

N

a

IN

H

NI

N

NI

N

zots

F=(,

z

zo

H

z

g

rloztse

ztr

X

(,N

F

Page 8: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TW O.A M P E I BO LE A S S EA,I B LAG L.S

considerably less than one micron. rllustrations of the other assemblages show a varietyof 2-amphibole textures within single grains. rn each of the cases shown the contact be-tween the two amphiboles is optically sharp at high magnification (600X).

described above. The hornblende and actinolite in this rock do not

parallel to (101 ) and (100). These lamellae are so small in scale, with amaximum thickness of approximately r/4 micron, that their chemicalcomposition could not be determined with the microprobe. rt is verylikely that these lamellae have an actinolite composition, similar to thatof the coexisting, eq'igranular and colorless actinolite. Similar occur-rences have been described in coexisting equigranular hornblende andcummingtonite in which the hornblende shows exsolution lamellae of

219

2 - 72 - a

Page 9: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

220 CORNELIS KLEIN

looCo

C o + N o

II

Co Fe

80 60- t 0 0 M o /' /Mg+Fe

CoMg

hornblendes by open circles.

more significant ratios, 100 Mg/(Mg*Fe'z+) and 100 Si/(Si+AIrv)

could not be computed because the electron probe method does not

allow the determination of the Fes+ content. The major element frac-

tionation is similar in each of the seven pairs; the more aluminous phase

(hornblende) is also the more iron rich. The hornblende contains also an

appreciable Na,:O content, whereas the maximum in the coexisting

actinolite is 0.5 weight percent Na2O.

Corxrsrrwc AcrrNorrro AND GTAUCoPHANE ConposrrroNs

The analyses of five actinolite-glaucophane pairs are given in Table 3,

in order ol increasing Fe content of the actinolite. The calcium-rich

amphiboles are referred to as actinolite because of their low NazO and

AIzOa contents, the maxima being 1.7 and 3.6 weight percent respec-

tively. The first four analysis pairs are new electron probe analyses,

rooSiS i + A l

IIt

Page 10: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

€ d d

TWO.A M P H I BOLE A S S EM B LAGES

+ \ o sh N o

^ l

O N

9E< 1 N \ O N + 1 C O O 4 - Ao N o \ o \ o 4 4 o c o c \D O A H A S 4 O N i

^ +A A--e -^V H

< r e 4 0 \ N \ o N o \ ^ Nc ) H @ N \ O o n O = O

< J r o s e + o e o N Nh

l aI n

l 1

3 o o oa ; a +a € N o \

O N \ O

r 6i tc;n i o O

\ 9 9N 4 Ss N a

\ o o N 4 N O , N < 1 0

< r O N + r O O H \ O O4

r a

+O

+1o

O O N g a O \ * 1 N :

+ o 6 i - i c i \ o o \ * c jq

€ o \ o \ o o \ o € € o I N o \ s o

4 O N : O O O \ O c | 1 e 4 O \A O \ \ O N

\ o o \ o N o N i N H I o O \ o N

O O O H O T O * O N O N N4 I O \ N € O \

N O \ N

N N :* r €

c o o + r o \ H o + ' N o l €< r o o 4 0 0 0 0 N o \ o4 t o \

€ O : N i o e d l H \ O

< ' ' O N O \ O € O i O \ O4 0

a c l a ?N € \ O OA N N

N N o r )

6 6i<.- jO \ € € O \

o -

Z r ' i l_"Y6bi><

a \ J a

oa

o + r o oN O 4N € O '

N

N

o

I

o

9 q " . | 9 : " l q \ ? |\ o o N \ o o o c ) N O I4 l

n?a" t r \ a : : I4 0 S N o € o = oh

8r$sE9sBs

zog

E

O

z+

Oh

Flr r l

z

aioz3O

zrrX

(J

F

Page 11: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

222 CORNDLIS KLEIN

whereas the fifth pair is quoted from the l iterature (Lee et al., 1966).All five pairs occur in glaucophane schists, four from Californian

localit ies and one (3-3) from the southern Urals, U.S.S.R. Detailedassemblage descriptions, locations and references are given at the bot-tom of Table 3. The textures of the amphiboles in all five samples aresimilar. The two amphiboles occur as distinct, individual, subhedralgrains which are closely and randomly intergrown, as well as compositegrains in which actinolite and glaucophane make up different parts ofthe same grain. I l lustrations of the textures are given in Figure 3. The

3 - '

Frc. 3. Sketches of actinolite-glaucophane relationships.'Ihe actinolite is unshaded, the

glaucophane is shaded. The numbers refer to the assemblages in Table 3. The bar length

represents 0.5 mm In assemblage 3 1 separate crystals of actinolite and glaucophane

coexist, The other illustrations show some of the actinolite-glaucophane interrelations

within single grains In all assemblages in Table 3 the contacts between the two amphi-

boles were found to be optically sharp at high magnification (600X). The illustration for

assemblage 3-5 was taken from Lee et al. (1966).

actinolite is pleochroic from colorless to light or dark green, whereasthe glaucophane is generally more strongly pleochroic from colorless,to l ight blue, to dark purplish blue.

Figure 4 shows the tieline distributions for the two-amphibole as-

semblages in Table 3, in terms of three molecttlar ratios. The majorelement distribution is similar in each of the five pairs. The Mg/(MS*Fe) ratio is larger in the actinolite than in the coexisting sodiumamphibole, and the Al-content is higher in the glaucophane than in the

actinolite. The compositional dif ierence (i.e. t ieline separation) between

the two amphiboles of assemblage 3-.5 is less than that of the other fourpairs. The amphiboles of assemblage 3-5 were separated by heavy l iquid

techniques (Lee et aL, 1966) and it seems very likely that such a separa-

Page 12: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

looCoC o + N o

III

No Fe

CoFe

g I oucophone

o c t i n o l i t e

80 60-- too Mg/,

/Mg+Fe

Fro. 4. Major element fractionation between actinolite and coexisting glaucophanecompositions. Because of the high Al content of the sodium amphiboles, their total com-position is only partially represented in the upper diagram. The glaucophane points maybe considered as projections onto the CaMg-CaFe-NaMg-NaFe plane from another com-ponent, AhOs. The lower diagram shows how far the glaucophane, as well as actinolitecompositions lie off the CaMg-CaFe-NaMg-NaFe plane, along the 100 Si/(Si*AI) axis.Actinolites are represented by solid black dots, glaucophane by open triangles. The tielinefor pair 3 5, reported by Lee et al. (1966), is dashed.

toosiS i+A l

Page 13: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

224 CjRNELIS KLErN

tion would not produce completely pure analysis separates. A smalladmixture of one amphibole in the separate of the other would tend toreduce the chemical dif ierence between the two members of the pair.

CoBxrsrrNc HonNernNpB enp Gr-eucoprrANE ColrposrrroNs

Table 4 gives the compositions of six hornblende-glaucophane pairs.The analyses are arranged in order of increasing Fe content of the horn-blende. The Ca-rich amphiboles are referred to as hornblende becausetheir AhOr content, which ranges from 4.9 to 14.8 weight percent AI2O3,is considerably higher than that of the actinolites in Table 3. Further-more, the NazO content of these hornblendes is generally larger thanthat of the actinolites in Table 3, and ranges from 1.3 to 3.6 weightpercent Na2O.

AII six pairs are found in glaucophane schists. Assemblages 4-1, 4-2,4-4, and 4-5 are from California, 4-3 is from Japan, and 4-6 from Scot-land. Detailed assemblage descriptions, locations and references aregiven at the bottom of Table 4.

The textures of these 2-amphibole occurrences are similar to those ofthe actinolite-glaucophane pairs. fn assemblage 4-l the glaucophaneoccurs as irregular zones and patches within and aroun<l nearly color-less, subhedral hornblende crystals. In assemblage 4-2 the glaucophaneis found as patches within, as well as distinct, separate grains betweenhornblende grains. In this assemblage glaucophane makes up about tenpercent of the total amphibole content. fn assemblage 4-3 the majorityof the amphibole is glaucophane; hornblende makes up about five per-cent of the total amphibole content. The hornblende is found as distinctzones within and around the edge of glaucophane crystals. Assemblage4-4 is f ine grained and the glaucophane and hornblende occur mainlyas separate, closely interwoven, individual crystals. The texture of theamphiboles in assemblage 4-5 is very similar to that of assemblage 4-2.Hornblende is very abundant in this rock and the glaucophane is foundat the corners and edges of coarse, subhedral hornblende grains, as wellas irregular, small grains interstit ial to the larger hornblende crystals.Assemblage 4-6 shows individual hornblende and glaucophane grainswhich are closely intergrown, as well as zones of glaucophane aroundand within the subhedral hornblende. fn each of the above occurrencesthe contact between hornblende and glaucophane is optically as well aschemically sharp. The textures of some of the samples are illustrated inFigure 5.

In Figure 6 the tieline distributions are shown for the two-amphiboleassemblages in Table 4, in terms of three molecular ratios. In four ofthe six pairs the glaucophane has a somewhat lower Mg/(Mg*Fe)

Page 14: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

225TWO-A M P H I BOI,E AS S EM B LAGES

o o N \ o

\ o o an €

o , N + 1

N \ o d\ o \ o \

o o o \ o N 6 l < ' t N < r o l c o i r 4. . 1

- O \ O N O O - \ O O l \ O - N N4 t o , a - € r

o \ N o N + r i H o o l n N < r \ o

\ O O O \ a O O O O \ o O l N 0 1 O H< r i l o \ < 1 \ o c o

tn

+

a

n

o: aaN b O ,\ O N

N \ o < l

c o a o o\ o N @

4 i : N N : A < ( i l \< . o o i - i d c i < i * < i l ;4 t o \

4 N a O O S e : O \ 4. a O d r o o N o N o$ : : i H

\ 9 1 C : . : T T ?D O N : O O O N O4

4 0 0 \ o c " ) a < r N i l - + r6 i c i - ; 6 i c ; $ o i - i d | ' c ;n t a

d r . o o \ o < 1 a o a o < r l NN : C ) N O < 1 O N Y l o . .4 t r H t r l o \

1 ? \ " l a 1 a a ?h O \ O + 1 O H i \ O Ob i e

N i N D r l ) c 4 O \ \ N l < t6 i c ; ; c ; d d d ; . i c ; l 6h i t o \

r b

+<l

r

<r

a l

o

r

+

a \

N

rN

r

<r

aztsa

FiE

Q

2

O

r.lr l

z

zrd'.]zg

zts

xU

F

\ " ? ?N h NN A O

c o o rD : C O

< 1 N D

d+ oiN € €

o 4 0

r 4 0 \

o | \ d . O \ O \ N 1 4 N \ O .

- j q < , o o v i * - j !4 C i t r

a?nO o \ o€ €

9 n 9N @ @

c O O N O N O D O I O I i

; d s < , o . i d i d l ^4 t o \

\ O N \ O N N O H O N I O \' . 1: c ) N 0 1 o \ o o d o | \ o4 t a

o ^

T+A; i : rZ z ' \ l

Yvi;

a \ ) a

ae$eEBsBs

Page 15: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

226 CORNDLIS KLEIN

1 - 2

Frc. 5. Sketches of hornblende-glaucophane relationships. The hornblende is unshaded,the glaucophane is shaded. The numbers refer to Table 4 The length of the bar represents0.2 mm. Although the illustrations show intergrowths of the two amphiboles within singlegrains on1y, a few of the assemblages (e.g. 4 6) also contain separate, closely intergrown,crystals of hornblende and glaucophane. The contacts between the two amphiboles werefound to be optically sharp in al1 assemblages of Table 4.

ratio than the coexisting hornblende. In two of the pairs the Mg7(Mgf Fe) ratio of the hornblende is very slightly lower than that ofthe glaucophane. If the ratio Mg/(Mgf Fe2+) could have been evalu-ated, it would probably be higher in the glaucophane than in the co-existing calcic amphibole, because the Fe3+ content is undoubtedlylarger in sodium amphiboles than in hornblende. The Al fractionationbetween the glaucophane and the coexisting hornblende is highly vari-able, as can be seen in the lower part of Figure 5. In assemblage 4-3the glaucophane is the more Al-rich phase whereas in assemblage 4-5the hornblende has the higher AlzOa content. This inconsistent patternof Al-fractionation between the two highly aluminous phases, horn-blende and glaucophane, as expressed by the ratio 100 Si/(Sif Al), maybe caused by a number of factors, some of which are: (1) The in-appropriateness of the ratio Si/(Sif Al). If the ratio Si/(Si+Alrv) couldhave been computed, it might not have shown such inconsistencies. TheAl in glaucophane is largely octahedrally coordinated, whereas horn-blende probably has both octahedrally and tetrahedrally coordinatedAl; (2) A strong temperature dependency for this fractionation (the

)>

Frc. 6. Major element fractionation between coexisting hornblende and glaucophanecompositions. Becaqse of the high AI content of both coexisting phases, their total composi-

{ion is only partially represented in the upper diagram. The hornblende and glaucophanepoints may be considered as projections from another component, Alzoa, onto the CaMg-CaFe-NaMg-NaFe plane. The lower diagram shows how far these compositions lie offthe CaMg-CaFe-NaMg-NaFe plane, along the 100 Si/(Si+AD axis. Hornblendes arerepresented by open circles, glaucophanes by open triangles.

a - l 1 - 6

Page 16: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

l ooCoC o + N o

TW.O-A M P H I BO LE A S S EM B LAGES

N o M g

g l o u c o p h o n e

h o r n b l e n d e

r00CorlAg -tooM.g /

, / Mg+FeCo Fe

toos i

- l0O MO / //Mg+Fg

Co Fe

Page 17: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

228 CORNELTS KLEIN

samples in Table 4, an<l Figure 5, are collected from different geologicconditions within the glaucophane schists, and it may well be that theFe/Mg fractionation, which is quite consistent, is not as sensitive todifferences in temperature as is the Al-fractionation); (3) The substitu-tion of Fe3+ for AI3+, which cannot be evaluated from the electron proberesults and (4) The influence of the composition of the other phases inthe assemblage.

CouposrrroNs oF OrHER CoBxrsrrwc Alrpnreolrs

Table 5 gives the compositions of fi.ve amphibole pairs in which thecompositions of the two coexisting amphiboles are such that they can-not be described under the above subdivisions of actinolite-hornblende,actinolite-glaucophane, or hornblende-glaucophane. The two amphibolemembers in the metadolerite or metabasalt (5-1) are both hornblendes.This assemblage is very similar to the rocks described in Table 2, inwhich the two coexisting amphiboles are actinolite and hornblende. Adark green colored hornblende (Hr) oc.urs as irregular patches within,and as irregular zones along the outer edges of coarse grained, euhedralto subhedral, l ight green hornblende grains (H1). The contacts betweenthe two hornblendes are optically sharp at high magnification (600X).An illustration of this occurrence is given in Figure 7.

In assemblages 5-2, 5-3, 5-4 and 5-5 the compositions of one or bothmembers of the amphibole pair are intermediate between hornblendeand sodium amphibole. In Table 5 these compositions are referred to ashornblende-glaucophane (HG). In these intermediate members the ratio100 Ca/(Ca*Na) is close to 50 percent, and ranges from 23.8 to 67.5percent.

In assemblage 5-2 an almost colorless amphibole with a verv slightbluish tinge and weak pleochroism (from colorless to very light greyishblue) makes up about 80 percent of the total amphibole content. Thisamphibole, referred to as hornblende-glaucophane in Table 5, occurs aseuhedral to subhedral grains between and around which a blue glauco-phane is found. This highly pleochroic glaucophane (colorless to lightblue, to purplish blue) occurs as small individual grains between, aswell as distinct relatively narrow zones within, the hornblende-glauco-phane grains. The contacts between the two amphiboles are opticallyand chemically sharp. Both amphiboles appear to be homogeneous andshow no exsolution lamellae at high magnification. An illustration ofthe texture is given in Figure 7.

The texture of the two amphiboles in assemblage 5-3 is very similarto that of 5-2. The amount of glaucophane, however, is much greaterthan in 5-2 and is about the same as that of the coexisting light greyish

Page 18: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

229TW O-A M P II I BO LE A S S EM B LAGES

d r . N N ! + r N + r o l O : 4 O

o i = ' o o o ' o i * ; ! i ; 6 * d$ t r t r i O \ +D@

@ * . . o € o b N N l \ o o \ e \ o6 i - C ; + o ; c i ^ i q l o i - i * o .4 tr tr | O\ \O\O€

\ O N 4 4 \ O o r + r o N l c O N o c | ,

; d * d d o i - i ; c j i 6 * - i ;q I o \ + : €

r / ) o c o o r o \ o c . ) : l a o N @ N

S O N < t O N O 4 O l \ O N O \ O4 l O , \ O N €

a iF

r

N c ) i o i c ) \ o o o l \ o N € o

^ i d * c j - i ; d + c ; l ; s i - i < i4 l o , N + @

d l H N @ N b b o N l < r < 1 c o N

O \ O o O @ C ) O \ \ O < 1 O I r N N od1 I o.1 <'dr€

\ O . O d l N b d o o l = f d N c O

< , ! c ; ; o - i - i d = | o i . i o i - ;4 E i H t r l O \ 4 o O

n * : a \ " ] \ 1 9 : I a f A PN Y a o c | , : 4 4 4 Y I c | . + 1 c ^ -4 t r t r | O \ N o @

d r \ o < t N < r N N N c o l + N o o

6 O - D O i i F O I N N < r N+ i : a \ O o O N

+ + r N \ o 4 o F < r F l N N . o -

N o o o € o € ) - o o l N N + q+ r I O \ \ O c ^ €

a l

o

a bn

o

n

o

N

h

o ^

' 7 . ^

J."+<g,t+9 v ; :

;i;Va Q @

888sa$eEgsBs

a

AE

zU

H

tu

@zH

Pr:O

F

Page 19: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

230

5 - 3

Frc. 7. Sketches of relationship of amphibole pairs whose analyses are given in Table 5

The length of the bar represents 0 2 mm. Assemblages 5-1 consists of two hornblendes,

of which one is only very faintly green (H1) and the other is dark green and highly pleo-

chroic (Hz) H1 is unshaded in the sketch, and Hz is shaded. The textural relation of these

two hornblendes is very similar to that shown for the actinolite-hornblende (2-4) in F-ig. 1'

Assemblage 5-2 consists of a Ca-Na-amphibole (HG) with a light blue tinge and a highly

pleochroic, blue glaucophane. The Ca-Na amphibole is unshaded in the sketch whereas the

glaucophane is shaded. The glaucophane occurs as zones within the other amphibole,

as well as separate grains. Assemblage 5-3 is similar to that in 5 2; the Na-Ca amphibole

is unshaded in the sketch, the glaucophane shaded. Assemblage 5-4 consists of t'wo amphi-

boles, both of which have a Ca/Na ratio close to unity. HGr is dark green (shaded in the

sketch) and HGz is practically colorless (colorless in the sketch). The illustration for 5-5

represents two grains of the "ferrian sodium-amphibo1e", described by van der Plas and

Hiigi (1961). The left grain shows a gradational change from a dark blue-green (highly

pleochroic) center to an almost colorless rim. The right grain shows very irregular, and

optically poorly defined zones of colorless amphibole (H) inside predominantly blue-green

grains (HG). This occurrence is the only one in this study in which the contact between

the two amphibole compositions appears to be gradational

blue hornblende-glaucophane. Again the contacts between the twoamphiboles are optically sharp and no exsolution lamellae were notedin either amphibole. Assemblages 5-2 and 5-3 are from the same areain the glaucophane schists in Japan.

Assemblage 5-4 consists of two amphiboles, both of which have a

composition intermediate between hornblende and glaucophane. Theratios 100 Ca/(Caf Na) are very similar in both members' 47.3 and41.8 respectively. The main difference in composition between the twoamphiboles is in their Fe and Mg contents. The dark green, more iron-rich member (HG) makes up approximately ninety percent of the totalamphibole content of the assemblage. The other member (HGz) ispractically colorless with a slight greenish tinge and occurs as relativelyregular zones as well as irregular patches within the subhedral grains of

the dark green member. The grain size of this schist is very fine which

Page 20: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TWO-AMPIIIBOLE ASSEMBLAGES 231

makes it difficult to establish the sharpness of the contacl between the

two members, at high magnification. It does seem, however, that in this

occurrence as in all others described above, the contact is opticallysharp. An illustration of the texture is given in Figure 7.

The two amphibole analyses for assemblage 5-5 represent the chemicalcompositions of the almost colorless zones (H) and the very dark greenparts (HG) of the "ferrian-sodium amphibole" described by van derPlas and Hiigi (1961). This highly zoned amphibole shows some crystals

which are almost continually zoned from a dark blue-green core to apractically colorless rim, with complete color gradation in between. fn

other crystals the dark green areas occur as irregular patches which

alternate with practically colorless patches and zones. In such grains

the zones between the two extremes in color appear to be gradational

rather than sharp. In many instances these crystals appear mottled

with optically poorly defined boundaries between the green and thepractically colorless areas. The textures of two grains in assemblage 5-5

are illustrated in Figure 7.The tieline distributions for the amphibole pairs in Table 5 are shown

in Figure 8. The fractionation patterns of the two hornblendes (5-1)

are very similar to those of the actinolite-hornblende pairs (Fig.2).

The Fe/Mg and Ca/Na fractionation in the other four 2-amphiboleoccurrences is very different from anv of the previously described occur-rences. In samples 5-2 and 5-3 the glaucophane member is more iron-

rich, which was also observed in earlier analyses, but the Ca/Na frac-

tionation is considerably less than in the amphibole pairs of Tables 3

and 4. In samples 5-4 and 5-5 the Ca/Na fractionation is very small,almost negligible, and the main difference between the two amphibolecompositions is in their Fe and Mg contents.

CoNcr-usroNs

The chemical data presented above provide quantitative informationon the chemical discontinuities among several members of the Ca-Naamphibole group. The contact between the two coexisting amphibolesis sharp, optically and chemically, in all assemblages except 5-5. In aconsiderable number of the assemblages (2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 4-2,

4-4, 4-5, 4-6, 5-2) individual, separate grains of the two amphiboles arefound in a random, closely interwoven intergrowth (many of thesesame assemblages also show zonation of one amphibole by or withinthe other). The texture of these rocks with separate and compositionallydifferent grains is very similar to the textures in closely intergrownassemblages of anthophyllite-hornblende and cummingtonite-hornblende(Klein, 1968). In such occurrences it is very likely that the two members

Page 21: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

q '

hornb l

f/

T

N o M g

2s2 CORNELIS KLEIN

60

g+ FeM s /

/M

7l 0os i

S i + A l

90

100r 0 0

C o A { 9

Page 22: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TW O.AM P H i BO LE AS S EM B LAGES

of the pair represent an equilibrium pair and that the two amphibolecompositions represent points across a miscibility gap. In assemblage2-1 (actinolite-hornblende) and in several of the actinolite-glaucophaneassemblages in Table 3 I would conclude, on the basis of the texture ofinterlocking, homogeneous grains of two different amphiboles, that herealso one is dealing with miscibility gaps between actinolite and horn-blende, and actinolite and glaucophane. The textures of the amphiboleswith zones and patches of the other amphibole, as in Figs. 5 and 7,are much more difficult to interpret. These zoned and patchy texturesare highly complex and do nol provide clear evidence for replacementof one amphibole by the other. The contacts between the amphiboles insuch textures are sharp, but the contact surfaces are highly irregular inform, and in many cases numerous and distinct patches of one amphiboleare enclosed in a single grain of the other (see Figs. 1, 3, 5 and 7).

As stated above, assemblages 2-I and 3-1 represent strong evidencefor simultaneous crystallization of two difierent amphiboles; the chem-istry of these two amphibole assemblages are very similar to the chem-istries of the other pairs in Tables 2,3 and 4 and of the first three pairsin Table 5. These similarities in chemistry make me conclude that inall cases in this study, except assemblage 5-5, the two amphibole com-positions represent points across a compositional gap. If indeed thecomplex zones and patches in the composite grains are of replacementorigin, the sharp contact between the two compositionally differentamphiboles provides evidence for a sharp break in composition betweenthe two amphiboles and this break would be expected if there were amiscibility gap in the system. In other words, replacement would begradational only if there is a complete compositional range betweentwo members of the system, and it would show abrupt discontinuitiesif there is a miscibil i ty gap in the system.

The majority of the rocks in Table 2, as well as assemblage 5-1(Table 5) are metadolerites or metabasalts from the Bidwell Bar area,California. Compton (1955, p. 42) concludes that the metamorphicgrade of these rocks lies between that of the greenschist and the amphi-bolite facies and he suggests that "the temperature of their environment

<<(<

Frc. 8. Major element fractionation among two coexisting hornblendes (5-l) and be-

tween four other Na-Ca and Ca-Na amphiboles. The coordinates are the same as in Fig. 6.

Hornblendes are represented by open circles, glaucophanes by open triangles, and inter-

mediate Na-Ca amphiboles by black squares. The tieline for the two compositions in 5-5

is dashed because there appears to be a gradational variation in composition between the

two end ooints.

233

Page 23: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

234 CORNDLIS KLEIN

N o F e

g l o u c o p h o n e

l o O C o

C o + N o

II o o

80 60 40- l o o M g / _ C o F e

,z Mg+ ts

Frc. 9. Composite diagram for the element fractionation of all amphibole pairs in thisstudy. The cross (f ) represents the 100 Mg/(MgfFe) and 100 Ca/(Ca*Na) ratios forriebeckite-tremolite no. 15 (Klein, 1966) which is a homogeneous amphibole, showing noexsolution lamellae or intergrowths optically or in single crystal X-ray studies. Actinolitesare represented by solid black dots, hornblendes by open circles, glaucophanes by opentriangles and intermediate ca-Na amphiboles by solid squares. The tielines for the compo-sitions in assemblases 3 5 and 5 5 are dashed.

is the same as that required by Eskola's epidote-amphibolite facies".These rocks, therefore, represent relatively low temperatures of forma-tion and as such provide the proper temperature conditions for theexistence of a possible miscibil i ty gap. That such a gap does indeedexist between actinolite and hornblende, under such conditions, hasbeen shown above. Miyashiro (1958, p. 249) similarly concludes that

l 00 l -1 0 0

€ o M g

Page 24: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TW O-AM PH I BO LE ASS EM BLAGES

"actinolite coexists with blue-green hornblende probably in stable

equilibrium owing to a miscibility gap between them", in a relatively

low-grade, Iow pressure, metamorphic terrane. In the higher grade part

of the same terrane he states that "this gap vanishestt '

A very large number of the assemblages in Tables 3, 4 and 5 are from

glaucophane schists in California and Japan for which the general

regional environmental conditions lie somewhere between 200o to

400"C, and between 6 to 9 kilobars pressure (Coleman, 1967; Ernst,

1965; Ernst and Seki, 1967). The low temperature of formation of these

rocks is the most important factor in the production of possible chemical

discontinuities between the amphiboles, and indeed such discontinuities

exist, as shown above. In Figure 9, which is a composite diagram of the

earlier four figures, the composition of a riebeckite-tremolite (Klein,

1966) is plotted from a metamorphic terrane that has been subjected

to considerably higher temperatures than those of the glaucophane

schists. This riebeckite-tremolite is a homogeneous phase intermediate

in composition between tremolite and riebeckite, and is one of the few

available analyses in this compositional area which prove that the

miscibility gap, as outlined by many of the pairs in Fig. 9, narrows or

possibly closes attsomewhat higher temperatures.The chemistry of assemblages 5-4 and 5-5 are considerably different

from the other assemblages in Tables 4 and 5. There is no textural

indication, however, that the amphibole pair in assemblage 5-4 does not

represent two compositional end points across a possible miscibility

gap. Sample 5-5, however, can probably not be interpreted as such.

The zonal relations are extremely irregular, sometimes tend to follow

cracks in the crystals and are at times gradational in nature. The edges

of the amphibole crystals, furthermore, have very irregular and com-

plex contacts with the other phases in the assemblage, and give the

impression of having been corroded. This assemblage is the only one

which provides evidence for complete compositional gradation between

the two end compositions, and may well represent a higher temperature

of formation than the other 2-amphibole pairs.

Acrnowlr,ocunxts

This study is based upon samples collected and studied by geologists the world over,

and were it not for their generosity to part with their samples, this work would have

been impossible. I am especially grateful to Dr. Priscilla P. Dudley, Boston College and

Professor Robert R. compton, Stanford university, for their cooperation and enthu.iasm

in providing me with a large number of samples. I wish to express my gratitude to in

alphabetical order-Drs. S. O. Agrell, T. W. Bloxam, A. C. Dunham, W' G' Ernst,

B. Evans, M. Iwasaki, O. Mellis, J. Orcel, and L. van der Plas, not only for their generosity

but also for their aid in locating a number of samples described in the literature.

Page 25: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

236 CORNELIS KLEIN

I am grateful to W. G. Ernst and J. B. Thompson, Jr. for their helpful discussions, andto w. G. Ernst for his critical reading of the manuscript and his suggestions for its im-provement. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant no.GA-1085.

Rnlenewcts

BeNNo, s. (1958) Glaucophane schist and associated rocks in the omi district, Japan.fap. J. Geol,. Geogr.,24,29-M.

Bloxe.u, T. W. eNn J. B. Ar,r,rx (1958) Glaucophane-schist, eclogite, and associated rocksfrom Knockormal in the Girvan-Ballantrae complex, South Ayrshire. Trans. Roy. soc.Ed,,inburgh,64, | 27.

Bonc, rnrs Y. (1956) Glaucophane schists and eclogites near Healdsburg, california.Geol,. Soc. Amer. BuIl.,67, 1563-1584.

cnrsNorov, B. v. (1959) Rutile bearing eclogites from the Shubin village deposit in theSouthern Urals, Izo. Vyssh. Uchebn., Zawd. Geol. Razted.,4, 12+-136, fTransl.in Int.GeoI Ret. ,2,936-945.1

comuax, R. G. (1967) Glaucophane schists from california and New caledonia. ,I.T ectono p hy si.c s, 4, +7 9498.

courron, R. R. (1955) Trondhjemite batholith near Bidwell Bar, california. Geol. soc.Am.er. 8u11.,66.9 44.

-- (1958) Significance of amphibole paragenesis in the Bidwell Bar region, california.Amer. Mineral. 43. 890-907.

Drnn, W. A., R. A. Howrn eno J. ZussuaN (1963) Roch fonning minerals, Vol,. 2, ChainSil,i,cates. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Duor-nv, Pnrscrr.l P. (1967) Gl,aucophane schists anil Associated, Roeks oJ the T,iburonPeninswlo, Marin County, CaliJornio. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Calif., Berkeley.

EnNsr, w. G. (1965) Mineral parageneses in Franciscan metamorphic rocks, panochePass, Cal i f . Geol . Soc. Amer. 8t t11, . ,76,879 gl4.

- AND Y. Srrr (1967) Petrol0gic comparison of the Franciscan and sanbagawa meta-morphic terranes. I. T ectono phy si.cs, 4, 463-47 8.

Essnrw, E. 1.0967) Petrogenesis oJ Fronci.scan Metamorphic Rocfts. ph.D. thesis, univ.Calif., Berkeley.

rweo, S. (1939) Petrology of the alkaline rocks of the Nayosi district, sakhalin, Japan.Jap. I. Geol. Geogr.,16, 155 204.

rw.Lsarr, M. (1960a) colorless glaucophane and associated minerals in quartzose schistsfrom Eastern Sikoku, Japan. J. Geol. Soc. fap.,66, 566-574.

(1960b) Barroistic amphibole from Bizan in eastern sikoku, Japan J. Geol soc.Jop.,66, 625-630.

- (1963) Metamorphic rocks of the K6tu-Bizan area, western Sikoku. ,I. Foc. Sci.,Uniu. Tokyo,15, t -90.

Jalrn, H. w., P. RourNsoN aNn c. KrrrN (1968) Exsoiution lamellae and optic orienta-tion of clinoamphiboles. Seience, 160, 7 7 6-7 7 B.

Kr,nrx, c. (1966) Mineralogy and petrology of the metamorphosed wabush iron forma-tion, Southwestern Labrador. f. Petrol,ogy,7, 246-305.

- (1968) Coexisting amphiboles. J. petrology, g, 281-330.L.r.cnorx, A. (1939) observations sur quelques mindraux de Madagascar. Bull. GEoI- Frane .

M iner aI. Cri,stal,l,agr., 62, 300-308.Lnr, D. E., R. G. Cor,ruaN, H. Besrnox exo V. C. Surrn (1966) A two-amphibole

glaucophane schist in the Franciscan Formation, cazadero area, sonoma iorrnty,California. U.S. GeoI. Surl. ProJ. Pap.,SS}-C, l4B-157.

Page 26: ACTINOLITE-HORNBLENDE GLAUCOPHANE 1 · amphibole pairs, which include, actinolite-hornblende, actinolite-glaucophane, hornblende-glaucophane, hornblende-hornblende, and several pairs

TW O-A M P I] I BO LE ASS EIII B LAGES

MrvAsrilno, A. (1958) Regional metamorphism of the Gosaisyo-Takanuki district in the

central Abukuma Plateau. I. Foc. Sci', [Jnirt. Tokyo, ll,219-272.- AND M. Iwes.qrr (1957) Magnesioriebeckite in crystalline schists of Bizan in

Sikoku, Japan. I. Geotr. Soc. Iap.,63, 698-703.

Ross, M., J. J. PanIKr .rl{D P. W. Wnrer.nN (1968) Exsolution in clinoamphiboles. science

159 ,1099 -1102 .

Snrrslanr, J. (1956) Some new data on the blue-green hornblende from the Tampere

schist belt. BulI. Comm. G6ol'. Finl,and.e,28, 4146.

Srrrro, F. ann A. Mrv,q.srrrno (1959) Hornblendes of basic metamorphic rocks. J. Fac. Sci.,

Unir. Tokyo, 12, 85-102.

varv onn Pr.ls, L. ,c,No T. Hiicr (1961) A ferrian-sodium amphibole from vals, Switzerland.

S c hw ei,z. M iner oJ. P etr o gr. M itt., 41, 37 l-393.

wrsruar, J. D. H. (193a) The central and southwest Highlands epidiorites: a study in

progressive metamorphism . Qwafi. f . Geol. Soc' Lonilon, 90, 354417 'yecr, f . (1953) Petrochemical studies on the alkalic rocks of the Morotu district, Sakhalin.

Geotr. Soc. Amer. Bwl'\.,64, 769 810.

Manuscript recei.reil, ApriJ 4, 1968; accepted' Jor publication, Augwst 1, 1968'

z J t


Recommended