Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Adams Central Community Schools
0015
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
76.4% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
52.8% x .50 = 26.4%
100% x .30 = 30%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
26.4% + 30% + 20% = 76.4%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
26.9% 3
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
42.3% 5
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
71.53 1
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 92.11 2
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 64.3% 3
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.34% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 40% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 80% 4
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 78.7% 2
Total Results Score 21
Weighted Percentage for Results 52.8%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
100% No Finding 5
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
North Adams Community Schools
0025
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
61.4% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
39% x .50 = 19.5%
80.9% x .30 = 24.3%
88% x .20 = 17.6%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
19.5% + 24.3% + 17.6% = 61.4%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
22.8% 3
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
23.6% 2
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
100.26 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 89.58 2
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 25.9% 1
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.73% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 53.3% 1
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 81.7% 3
Total Results Score 18
Weighted Percentage for Results 39%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
67% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation No 1
Total Data Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Data 88%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
South Adams Schools
0035
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
73.1% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
46.1% x .50 = 23.1%
100% x .30 = 30%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
23.1% + 30% + 20% = 73.1%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
38.3% 5
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
36.7% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
100.54 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 109.78 5
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 58.3% 2
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 2.07% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 77.8% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 50% 1
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 73.1% 2
Total Results Score 24
Weighted Percentage for Results 46.1%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
100% No Finding 5
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
M S D Southwest Allen County
0125
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
76.1% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
57% x .50 = 28.5%
100% x .30 = 30%
88% x .20 = 17.6%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
28.5% + 30% + 17.6% = 76.1%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
31.3% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
29.1% 3
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
98.63 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 104.79 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 67.4% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.85% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 76.1% 2
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 76.2% 3
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 72.2% 1
Total Results Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Results 57%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Data 88%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Northwest Allen County Schools
0225
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
91% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
82% x .50 = 41%
100% x .30 = 30%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
41% + 30% + 20% = 91%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
33% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
32.9% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
99.71 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 102.44 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 71.8% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.83% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.3% 4
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 94.6% 5
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 81.6% 3
Total Results Score 37
Weighted Percentage for Results 82%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Fort Wayne Community Schools
0235
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
65.8% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
39.5% x .50 = 19.8%
86.7% x .30 = 26%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
19.8% + 26% + 20% = 65.8%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
17.3% 2
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
18.8% 2
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
88.65 2
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 98.24 3
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 48.8% 2
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.31% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 74.4% 2
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 70.8% 2
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.5% 2
Total Results Score 18
Weighted Percentage for Results 39.5%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
Continued NonCompliance
1
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 97% Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
95% Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance No 1
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 27
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 86.7%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
East Allen County Schools
0255
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
64.2% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
32.5% x .50 = 16.3%
93% x .30 = 27.9%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
16.3% + 27.9% + 20% = 64.2%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
26.2% 3
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
25.2% 3
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
89.8 3
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 101.32 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 55.7% 2
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.41% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 69.8% 1
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 53.6% 1
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 66.6% 1
Total Results Score 19
Weighted Percentage for Results 32.5%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
Finding 1
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
96% Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
100% No Finding 5
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 93%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp
0365
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
72.8% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
57% x .50 = 28.5%
80.9% x .30 = 24.3%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
28.5% + 24.3% + 20% = 72.8%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
27.1% 3
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
32.7% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
93.86 3
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 97.48 3
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 66.4% 3
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.27% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 80.4% 3
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 71.6% 2
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 87% 4
Total Results Score 26
Weighted Percentage for Results 57%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 99% Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
96% Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
80% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Flat Rock-Hawcreek School Corp
0370
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
69.4% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
43.6% x .50 = 21.8%
100% x .30 = 30%
88% x .20 = 17.6%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
21.8% + 30% + 17.6% = 69.4%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
15.9% 1
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
27% 3
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
76.96 1
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 100.48 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 62.5% N/A
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.68% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 83.3% N/A
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 82.4% 3
Total Results Score 14
Weighted Percentage for Results 43.6%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation No 1
Total Data Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Data 88%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Benton Community School Corp
0395
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
71.4% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
42.8% x .50 = 21.4%
100% x .30 = 30%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
21.4% + 30% + 20% = 71.4%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
22.4% 2
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
27.1% 3
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
78.19 1
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 86.97 2
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 57.1% 2
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.62% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 91.7% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 83.3% 4
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 64.9% 1
Total Results Score 16
Weighted Percentage for Results 42.8%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
100% No Finding 5
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Blackford County Schools
0515
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
72.1% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
60.5% x .50 = 30.3%
80.9% x .30 = 24.3%
88% x .20 = 17.6%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
30.3% + 24.3% + 17.6% = 72.1%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
25.2% 3
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
30.6% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
95.31 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 97.16 3
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 71.4% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.28% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 84.6% 4
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 79.8% 3
Total Results Score 27
Weighted Percentage for Results 60.5%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
0% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation No 1
Total Data Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Data 88%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Western Boone County Community School District
0615
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
78.7% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
68.9% x .50 = 34.4%
80.9% x .30 = 24.3%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
34.4% + 24.3% + 20% = 78.7%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
29.3% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
33.1% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
99.12 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 105.53 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 87.5% 5
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.01% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.3% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 76.9% 3
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 85.3% 4
Total Results Score 29
Weighted Percentage for Results 68.9%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
50% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Zionsville Community Schools
0630
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
82% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
75.5% x .50 = 37.8%
80.9% x .30 = 24.3%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
37.8% + 24.3% + 20% = 82%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
51.2% 5
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
47.8% 5
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
97.23 4
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 93.23 3
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 78.6% 5
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.73% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 94.4% 5
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 78.3% 3
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 82.5% 3
Total Results Score 38
Weighted Percentage for Results 75.5%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
86% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 80.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Lebanon Community School Corp
0665
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
72% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
58% x .50 = 29%
76.5% x .30 = 23%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
29% + 23% + 20% = 72%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
31.7% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
36.9% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
88.09 2
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 106.16 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 69.8% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.29% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 88.4% 5
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 77.3% 3
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 79.7% 2
Total Results Score 29
Weighted Percentage for Results 58%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Continued Noncompliance
5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
40% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance No 1
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 27
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 76.5%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Brown County School Corporation
0670
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
82.2% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
79.4% x .50 = 39.7%
74.9% x .30 = 22.5%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
39.7% + 22.5% + 20% = 82.2%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
29.1% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
36.1% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
93.89 3
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 91.36 2
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 72.1% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.28% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 62.5% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 92.6% 5
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 91.3% 5
Total Results Score 28
Weighted Percentage for Results 79.4%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
No Evaluations No Evaluations N/A
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
67% Finding 1
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 26
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 74.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants Yes 5
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 35
Weighted Percentage for Data 100%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Carroll Consolidated School Corp
0750
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
76.3% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
60.6% x .50 = 30.3%
100% x .30 = 30%
80% x .20 = 16%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
30.3% + 30% + 16% = 76.3%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
8.5% 1
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
13.6% 1
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
83.17 2
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 70.75 1
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 60% N/A
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.33% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 100% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 87.5% 5
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.8% 2
Total Results Score 17
Weighted Percentage for Results 60.6%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants No 1
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 27
Weighted Percentage for Data 80%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Delphi Community School Corp
0755
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
72.1% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
61.8% x .50 = 30.9%
100% x .30 = 30%
56% x .20 = 11.2%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
30.9% + 30% + 11.2% = 72.1%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
8.5% 1
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
13.6% 1
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
92.5 3
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 99.5 4
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 37.5% N/A
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.65% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 77.8% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 85.7% 4
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 74.7% 2
Total Results Score 20
Weighted Percentage for Results 61.8%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
No Evaluations No Evaluations N/A
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 25
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) No 1
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) No 1
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants No 1
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 19
Weighted Percentage for Data 56%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Pioneer Regional School Corp
0775
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
84.8% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
77.7% x .50 = 38.8%
100% x .30 = 30%
80% x .20 = 16%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
38.8% + 30% + 16% = 84.8%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
21.7% 2
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
16.7% 2
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
92.39 3
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 88.04 2
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 72.7% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 0.6% 5
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 100% N/A
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 33.3% N/A
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 90.6% 5
Total Results Score 23
Weighted Percentage for Results 77.7%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) No 1
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants No 1
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 27
Weighted Percentage for Data 80%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Lewis Cass Schools
0815
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
66.6% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
61.1% x .50 = 30.5%
74.9% x .30 = 22.5%
68% x .20 = 13.6%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
30.5% + 22.5% + 13.6% = 66.6%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
21.3% 2
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
23.4% 2
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
106.25 5
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 111.84 5
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 50% N/A
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.43% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains No Data 1
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 86.7% 5
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 77.6% 2
Total Results Score 23
Weighted Percentage for Results 61.1%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 100% No Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
75% Finding 1
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 26
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 74.9%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) No 1
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants No 1
ISTAR-KR Participation No 1
Total Data Score 23
Weighted Percentage for Data 68%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
Logansport Community School Corp
0875
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
60.9% Needs Assistance Targeted
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
25% x .50 = 12.5%
100% x .30 = 30%
92% x .20 = 18.4%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
12.5% + 30% + 18.4% = 60.9%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
12.5% 1
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
13.1% 1
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
79.75 1
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 81.94 1
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 58.3% 2
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.3% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 78.7% 3
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 60.6% 1
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 56.8% 1
Total Results Score 12
Weighted Percentage for Results 25%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories due to inappropriate identification.
No Finding 5
11. Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 50 days. 98% Finding 5
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
100% No Finding 5
13. Percent of youth aged 14 and above or entering grade 9, whichever occurs first (per Article 7) with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Not In Rotation Not In Rotation N/A
Lack of Continuing Noncompliance Yes 5
Lack of Longstanding Noncompliance Yes 5
Total Compliance Score 30
Weighted Percentage for Compliance 100%
Timely Data Submissions Matrix
Data Collection Timely Total Points
DOE-ES (Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-SE (LRE, Disproportionality) Yes 5
DOE-EV (Timely Evaluations and First Steps Transitions) Yes 5
DOE-TR/GR (Graduation) Yes 5
DOE-PE/HB/NE/CL/CC/CP (Required SPED Reporting) Yes 5
Part B Grants No 1
ISTAR-KR Participation Yes 5
Total Data Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Data 92%
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix-Example
Indiana State Department of Education
2018 Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Determination Matrix
West Clark Community Schools
0940
RDA Determination Percentage RDA Determination Differentiated Level of Support
71% Meets Requirements Universal
Weighted Percentage Multiplied by % Overall
RDA Score Equals Overall Category Score
57% x .50 = 28.5%
74.9% x .30 = 22.5%
100% x .20 = 20%
Results Plus Compliance Plus Data Equals RDA SCORE
28.5% + 22.5% + 20% = 71%
Results Matrix
ISTEP+ Proficiency Data Percentage Score
English/Language Arts
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
31.8% 4
Mathematics
Percentage of Proficiency for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics
34.3% 4
ISTEP+ Growth Data Points Score
English/Language Arts
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in English/Language Arts
104.11 5
Mathematics
Average Growth Points for Students grades 3-8 with Disabilities Participating in Regular Statewide Assessment in Mathematics 114.3 5
IREAD Proficiency Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Proficiency for 3rd Grade Children with Disabilities Participating in the IREAD-3 Statewide Assessment 68.9% 4
Participation on Alternate Assessment Percentage Score
Percentage of Participation for Students with Disabilities taking the Indiana Alternate Assessment 1.77% 1
Preschool Data Percentage Score
Percentage of Students Displaying Growth on three ISTAR-KR Domains 83.4% 4
Graduation Rate Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with Disabilities who Graduated with any Diploma Designation 79.5% 3
Least Restrictive Environment Percentage Score
Percentage of Children with an LRE Code of 50 (80%+ time in general education classroom) 71.3% 1
Total Results Score 31
Weighted Percentage for Results 57%
Compliance Matrix
Federal Compliance Indicators Percentage Status Score
4B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
N size is too small N/A
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic grou