Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | keyla-annable |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Jiří Štekláč‘s
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Structure of this projectIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Introduction & generally about addictionIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►What kind of addictions do we know?
►Ho
w w
e can u
se it?
►Internallyby own„brain“
►Externallyby own„act“
►How we can judge degree of danger?
►neutraldanger ◄
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Introduction & generally about addictionIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►What kind of regulations exist?
► prohibiton
► strict regulation
► legalization
►What kind of addictive substances we talk about?
► prohibited danger addictive substances which are using externally
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Lesson from HistoryIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►1909 – Shanghai opium conference
►1912 – International opium convence
►1914 – Harrison‘s narcotic act (USA)
►1925,31 – Geneva
►1936,46,48,53 – next steps
►1961 – „Treaty on drugs“ - UNO
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Lesson from HistoryIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Amount of adopted antidrug-law in USA from 1965 to 1998
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Source: USA law codex and OSN
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Introduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►TWO ALTERNATIVES
►Conservatives- drugs shouldn‘t be legalisedbecause it would rise up amount of
addicts
►Liberals- drugs should be legalisedbecause there would be no more addicts and lower criminality
Area of theories
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Area of theoriesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►CONCERVATIVE WAY
►Elliot Currie
- „Higher levels of drug use do go hand in hand with increased crime, especially property crime.“
►Bill Bennett
- „Making drugs legal would just be a way of subsidizing [addicts] habit. They would continue to rob and steal to pay for food, for clothes, for entertainment.“
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Area of theoriesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►LIBERAL WAY
►Gary Stanley Becker
„Every american president without exception has lost war with drugs.“
-The problem is in property of demand for drugs (very unelastic)
-expected punishment raises the price, but do not diminish demanded quantity significantly (►drugs are very expensive for everybody - trader, consumer and for government)
SOLUTION: „Legalization of drugs combined with an excise tax on consumption would be a far cheaper and more effective way to reduce drug use.“
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Area of theoriesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►LIBERAL WAY
►Milton Friedman
-Effect of „forbidden fruits“
-He wrote an open letter to Bill Bennett:
-„Illegality creates obscene profits that finance the murderous tactics of the drug lords.“
-„Had drugs been decriminalized 17 years ago, "crack" would never have been invented.“
-He highlighted the link between drug and alcohol prohibition
SOLUTION: Drugs in every shop & supermarket
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Consequences of the antidrug-lawsIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►What will people do If government prohibit some good???
A) People stop buying prohibited good
B) People will buy it on the black market
Pears
Apples
Left shoe
Right shoe
Remains here or not?
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Consequences of the antidrug-lawsIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Adopted law & drug criminality in USA from 1965 to 1998
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2019
6519
6619
6719
6819
6919
7019
7119
7219
7319
7419
7519
7619
7719
7819
7919
8019
8119
8219
8319
8419
8519
8619
8719
8819
8919
9019
9119
9219
9319
9419
9519
9619
9719
98
Source: USA law codex and OSN
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Source: Unifrom Crime Reports, 1965-1998, Federal Buerau of Investigation
Amount of law adoptedDrug arrests per
100.000 population
Consequences: Drugs are almost complements to other goods for addicts, If government extend amount of adopted anti-drug law, than the amount of criminals will be extended too.
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Consequences of the antidrug-lawsIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Evolution of drug-related deaths in USA from 1979 to 2006 per 100.000 population
Consequences: More Antidrug law cause more intensive development of more dangerous drugs
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
Source: U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Report (NVSR)
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Consequences of the antidrug-lawsIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Absolute amount of outlaw drug trades in USA from 1993 to 2007
Consequences: Strictest punishment as death penalty does not influenced rising tendency of drug trading
14000
19000
24000
29000
34000
39000
44000
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Source: Eurostat
Senator Joe Biden (nowadays vicepresident) promoted drug Kingpins on the federal level above the murderers-Introduction of death penalty for drug distribution
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Conclusions on addictive substancesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►We can accept two thesis
►Racional thesis about addiction and addictive substances
- every addiction is caused by addictive substance and we can only distinguish between internally and externally way of using
►Empirical thesis about the paradox impact of prohibition of addictive substances
-extension of anti-drug law brings extension of drug criminality and it‘s in contradiction with sence of anti-drug law. Moreover it has very negative impact on social and economic aspects.
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Conclusions on addictive substancesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Sence of first thesis
►Government are not able to prohibit all addictive substances (especially internal) and in these cases punishment is possible only „ex post“
-example: government can‘t prohibit using of substance, which is produced by brain and caused addiction to power …
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Conclusions on addictive substancesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Sence of first thesis
►Government do not prohibit some external addictive substances
-example: petrol which we can buy everywhere and we can use it as external addictive substance
Why anybody buy expensive drugs instead of petrol?
Maybe because petrol has not effect of forbidden fruit, maybe because addict rather buy „quality drug“ which is produced by drug producer in this „quality“ only because this drug is forbidden!
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Conclusions on addictive substancesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Sence of second thesis
►From the empirical evidence:Policy of prohibition of drugs has been failed and extended whole problem
►No evidence that prohibition of drugs brings lower level of addicts
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Conclusions on addictive substancesIntroduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
►Why drugs still not legal?
►almost conservative society
►myths about the human act
►lack of courage of politicans to talk about controversial topics
►apathy to results of anti-drug policy
►ethical, religious and moral prejudices
Addiction & Addictive substanes 5ie450, Economics of state interventionism
Sources:Introduction & generally about
addiction
Lesson from History
Area of theories
Consequences of the antidrug-laws
Conclusions on addictive
substances
Literacy:Milton Friedman: Prohibition and Drugs - From Newsweek, May 1, 1972Milton Friedman: The War We Are Losing - Searching for Alternatives: Drug-Control Policy in the United States, pp. 53-67, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 1991.Milton Friedman: An Open Letter To Bill Bennett, The Wall Street Journal, Thursday, September 7, 1989The US Dept. of Justice: Drug Legalization: Myths and Misconceptions
Internet sources:History of the War on Drugs, http://civilliberty.about.comGary Becker: The failure of the War on Drugs, http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/EUROSTAT, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/Federal Bureau of Investigate (FBI), http://www.fbi.gov/Timeline: America's War on Drugs, http://www.npr.org