Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act ... regulation 16 july 2008 schedule3...

94 No. 31242 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 JULY 2008

ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES REGULATIONS, 2008

SCHEDULE 3

Categories of offences and infringements, penalty units, penalty and discount amounts and demerit points in terms of Regulation 70, 7 I, and 24

Key fo columns in Schedule:

Column I

Column 2

Column 3

Column 4

Column 5

Column 6

Column 7

Column 8

Column 9

Column 10

Column I 1

Item number

Charge code

Short statutory reference to National Road Traffic Act, 1996

Short charge wording - reference to National Road Traffic Act, 1996

Classification of offence, major infringement and minor infringement

Penalty

Demerit Points

Penalty amount (Rand)

Discount amount (Rand)

Discounted amount (Rand)

Operator charge in terms of section 49 of the National Road Traffic Act, 1996 Indication of charge against operator simultaneously to charge against driver.

l ~ e y fo abbreviafions in Schedule:

NRTA National Road Traffic Act, 1996

NRTR National Road Traffic Regulations, 2000

NLTTA National Land Transport Transition Act, 2000

RWC Motor vehicles that requires roadworthy certificates in terms of regulation 142 of the NRTR

Non-RWC Motor vehicles that does not require roadworthy certificates in terms of regulation 142 of the NRTR

I Infringements

MI Major infringements

0 Offences

C Court - no penalty allowed

STAATSKOERANT, 16 JULIE 2008 No. 31242 95

I Key to items in Schedule:

Act or Regulation

Registering authorities and authorised officers

I NRTA Chapter II: Failure to comply with 1 / instruction or direction of an oftker

Fitness of drivers

1 Fitness of vehicles

3

5

57

56

90

Registration and licensing of motor vehicles, and registration of manufacturers, builders and importers, and manufacturers of number plates

NRTA Chapter Ill: Registration and licensing of motor vehicle NRTR Chapter Ill Part I: Registration and licensing of motor vehicle NRTR Chapter Ill Part Ill: General

9 1

100

144

145 149

161

724 -

767 776 1144

58

4(2)

99

Io8

148 160

723

-766 775 1143 1157

230

2 1 (4)

52(1)

36W (c)

68(2)

NRTA Chapter V: Testing stations to be registered NRTA Chapter V: Roadworthiness of vehicles NRTR Chapter VI Part I: Fitness of vehicles NRTR Chapter VI Part It: Equipment on or in respect of vehicles NRTR Chapter VI Part Ill: Dimensions of vehicles NRTR Chapter VI Part IV: Loads on vehicles

- Mass overloading - Various

NRTR Chapter VI Part V: Provisions relating to passenger carrying vehicles

82(4)

89(3)

Motor trade numbers, temporary and special permits

NRTR Chapter IV Part I: Motor trade numbers NRTR Chapter IV Part 11. Temporary and special permits

69(3)

84(4)

37

42(1) 44(1) l4O(2)(c)

149

22 1 (a)

233(1)(b) 234(1)

244

250

145(1)

219

229(2)(b)

233(2) 242(d) 247(b)

264A(3)


t Dangerous goods

E 3 .- t!

1231 1247

I Road traffic signs and general speed limits

I

E u ; E W

1246

1248

1249

Rules of the road and matters relating thereto

Act or Regulation

Operator fitness

NRTA Chapter VI: Operator fitness NRTR Chapter VII: Operator fitness

1295

12"

1741

Matters relating to driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug having narcotic effect, and offences and penalties 7

E 0 .- c1 0 a8 V) t! 3 V)

45

NRTA Chapter VIII: Transportation of certain dangerous goods prohibited NRTR Chapter VIII: Transportation of dangerous goods and substances by road

1740

1830

1834

Igg2

2000

reports / "'\='I

NRTA Chapter XI: Reckless or negligent driving, (

E 0 .- C 0 Q) V) u c W

49(g)

54

NRTA Chapter IX: Faihre to obey road traffic sign prohibited NRTA Chapter IX: Speed limits NRTR Chapter IX: Road traffic signs and general speed limits

1991

Igg9

2007

I NRTA Chapter X: Accidents and accident

2050 1 2052 1 AARTO

E 0

t! g 2;

oi

265(1)

275

58

59

Chapter X Part I: Rules of the road Chapter X Part 11: Driving signals and signals for the control of traffic Chapter X Part Ill: General - towing of vehicles

C 4 I,.\

inconsiderate driving, driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a drug having a narcotic effect, and miscellaneous offences

2053 1 2055 1 Provincial legislation and by-laws

E 0 - u

E 1 m t

281(2)(a)

63(1)

293(2)(b)

296(1)

324

330

295(2)

323(5)

329(2)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 4 1 5 1 6 1 7

I

Failed to comply with instruction, direction given by a Sect 30) t r a m ofker, or obstructed, hindered or interfered withi I I 10 / 1 1 500 1 250 1 250 1 0

the exercise of a power or performance of a duty I I I I I I I I I I

2 1001 Sect 30) Faded to comply wlth a slgnal from a traffic officer I 5

IRTA Chapter Ill: Registration and licensing of motor vehicles, and registration of manufacturers, builders and nporters, and manufacturers of number plates

3 1002 Sect. 4(2) 10 1 500 250 250 49(d) Failed to license a vehicle with the appropriateregistering I

authority

4 Failed to register a vehicle with the appropriate registerin, 1003 Sect. 4(2) I 10 1 500

authority 250 250 49(d)

IRTR Chapter Ill Part I: Registration and licensing of motor vehicle

5 i200 Reg, 2,(4) I 10 1 500 Operated a specially classified vehicle contrary to the condition of its classification Personalised licence number holder. with cancellation. I

6 1201 Reg. 28A(2)-(3) failed to submit the personalised licence plates and I 10 1 500 documentation concerned

I I I I I I I Vehicle displaying a licence number on a number plate

Reg 35(1) lWhiCh did not mmpiy with SANS 1116 Specifi~ationS I I lo I ' 1 8 1203 Reg, 35(2)(a)

Operated a vehicle with a number plate that did not bear a self destructive certification mark

1 10 1 5 0 0

9 1204 Reg, 35(2)(b) Vehicle with a number plate which did not have a yellow or white retrc-reflective surface

I 10 1 500

I I I I I I I

Vehicle wlth a number plate that did not have letters and Reg. 35(2)(c) figures of the correct colours or not only black letters and 1 I 1 1 0 ) l / 5 0 0

figures on a yellow retro-reflective surface

1206 1 Reg, 35(2)(d) Vehicle with a number plate with a logo or landscapenot Ion a white retro-reflective surface I

12 1 1207 1 Reg. 35(2)(e) l~ehic le with a number plate not clearly legible or visible I I 1 10 1 1 1 500

11 I I208 I Reg. 35(3) I Vehicle with a number plate on which the letters1 figures were not arranaed as orescribed. ( I I l O / l 1500

I I I I I I I - .~~ ~

I l~umber date on the rear with letters and fioures of 601 I I I Reg, 35(4)

mm whiist 75 mm would have fitted the-illuminated 1 4 I 1 2 0 9 0 ) 1 space, or a number plate wh~ch was not the size of the

illum~nated soace orovided I I I I I I I , .

15 ,210 Reg, 35(5) 1 10 1 5 0 0 Only affixedone number plate to a motor vehicle. except a motor cycle B trailer

16 1 1211 1 Reg. 35(5) (Failed to afEx both number plates of a vehicle thereto I 0 I C 1 6 1 0

Reg. 35(6)(a) 1 Displayed a licence number, or anything purporting to be a licence number, not applicable to the vehicle

18 1213 Reg 35(6)(b) I 5 0 250 Vehicle with a licence number which was in any way obscured or had become illegible

19 1214 Reg, 35(6)(b) 0 C 6 0 Vehicle with licence numbers wh~ch were in any way obscured or had become illegible

20 1215 Reg, 35(6)(c)(i) I 5 0 250 Vehicle with a design appearing on a number plate or number plate holder

21 1216 Reg, 35(6)(c)(i) I 10 1 5 0 0 Vehicle with a design appearingon both number plates or number plate holders

98 No. 31242 GOVERNMENT GAZElTE, 16 JULY 2008

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulation 4

Short charge wording - reference to National Road Traffic Act. 1996

'ehicle whereon appeared within 150 mm of the licencc umber anything which was not a wmpone,nt part of the tandard equipment or construction of that vehicle

ehicle whereon appearedwithin 150 mm of both licena umbers anything which was not a component part of thc !andard equipment or construction of that vehicle

ehicle deemed to be registered and licensed in 2 rescribed territory, not complying w~th the legislation o bat territory

ehide registered in another territory but failed to displa) stinguishing signs of country concerned as allocated ir !rms of the Convention.

Reg. 35(6)(c)(ii)

Reg. 35(6)(c)(ii)

Reg. 35(6)(d)

Reg. 35(6)(e)

ehicle registered in the RSA with a distinguishing sign ,t allocated to the Republic in terms of the Convention

ehicle reoistered in the ReDublic dis~lavina a loao 01 . , - " nascape other than that determ ned by the MEC

ehne witn a n,mber plate wltn a ~cence n~moer no1 - -

Reg 35(6)(g) ,pl~cable to the vehicle or anything purporting to be a :ence number

Reg. 35(6)(9)

Reg. 35(6)(h)

ehicle with number plates with a licence number no1 )pl~cable to the vehicle or anything purporting to be a :ence number

?hide with each number piate not displaying the same snce number, letter type, wlours and logo or landscap

-

Reg 35(6)(i)

Reg 35(7)(a) 1

?hide di~Dlavin0 a number Dlate which did not com~lv , , < , , th the standard specifications SANS 1 1 16

~mber plate so affixed to the vehicle that it was easily

?hide with the number plate not affixed thereto in an right position or within 30' of such position

thicle with the number plate of the vehicle not affixed ereto in such a manner that each letter and figure sreon was clearly legible ?hicle with a number plate of the said vehicle not affixed lreto in such a manner that the whole number plate 3s clearly visible

>tor cycle, motor tricycle or motor quadrucycle w~thout lumber plate affixed to the back of the vehicle

I

Reg, 35(7)(e) Trailer wlthout a number plate affixed to the back of the wnhirln ..,,,,...., Vehicle with only the front or only the rear number plate

Reg' 35(7)(9 of the said vehicle affixed thereto

Reg. 35(7)(9 l~ehicie with no front or rear number plate affixed thereto 1 I I~ouble-deck bus with an enaine at the rear. with the

40

41

42

1235

1236

1237

Reg. 35(8)(a)

Reg. 35(8)(b)

Reg. 35(10)

number plate affixed thereto-higher than 1,9 m from' ground level Vehicle, not a double-deck bus, with the number plate of such vehicle affixed thereto higher than 1,5 m from ground level

In possession of a number plate not applicable to any motor vehicle owned by him or her, and failed to destroy such number plate

STAATSKOERANT, 16 JULIE 2008 NO. 31242 99

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008 7-

-

- C Si - C lil - F 01 7

0 di - v lic a - v4 lic le - VI di dl frc - Vl WI

or Wi - Vf SL

- Vt di ! 5 vt wt - vc o t -


lperated a vehicle without d~splaying the licence disc ol a ~ d vehicle

Reg. 36(1)

Reg. 36(1) lperated a vehicle without displaying the necessan Znce and roadworthv certificate disc

Reg. 36(l)(a)

Reg. 36(l)(a)

ailed to display licence and roadworthy certificate d~sc n a transparent windscreen

perated a vehicle with a transparent windscreen without splaying the licence disc as specified

ehicle not fitted with a transparent windscreen, with the :ewe disc and roadworthy certificate disc not affixed in conspicuous position on the left front side of the vehicle

Reg. 36(l)(a)

Reg. 36(l)(b)

Reg. 36(l)(b)

Reg. 36(l)(c)

ehicle not fitted with a transparent windscreen, with the :ence disc not affixed in a conspicuous position on the ft front side of the vehicle

ehicle on which the licence and roadworthy certificate sc was exposed to the weather, failed to protect the sai' xument by affixing it on the inside of the transparent mt of a durable watertight holder

shicle on which the licence disc was exposed to the eather, failed to protect the said document by affixing it i the inside of the transparent front of a durable atertight holder

Reg. 36(2)(a)

Reg. 36(2)(a)

shicle on which a llcence disc was displayed whilst, ~ c h document was not applicable to such vehicle

?hide on which a licence and roadworthy certificate' jc was displayed whilst such document was not ~plicable to such veh~cle

iich in any way was obscured or had become illegible Reg. 36(2)(b)

Reg. 36(2)(b) 1 ?hide with a licence disc which in any way was rscured or had become illegible !hide that was not registered and licensed or not

NRTR Cha ter Ill . Vehicle without a valid temporary import permit being Reg. 36(3)(c) displayed on such motor vehicle whilst such permit was I

required in terms of Custom and Excise legislation

rt Ill: General I I I Operator, with a change in the postal or street address,

Reg. 52(1) failed to, within 21 days of such change. notify the I appropriate registering authority of such change

Operator, when a change ~n the proxy or representativ Reg. 52(2) occurred, failed to notify the appropriate registering I

authority of such change 1 Disposed of or delivered or traded with a vehicle without

:eg 53(l)(a)(ii) the registration certificate, or if the vehicle is required to be licensed, the vehicle l~cence did not accompany the vehicle concerned


- 2

al 'El

v 8 P x 0

- 9 -

0) - P 'El

A K C - C1

3

:: ii

- 250

- 250

- 250

- 250

- 250

- 250

- 250 -

250

-

250

- 250

-

P w

B d t 0 ) ' - U .J g .E c U gi 5 Short charge wording - reference to National Road = 1 2 v 2 5 Traffic Act, 1996 $c' g E Z 2 2' 2 1 " 5 +i= 5 E $ % 5 5 C ln $ .-

Acquired or took delivery of a vehicle whilst it was not Reg. 53(l)(b) permitted to dispose of, or deliver the or trade with the I 10

vehicle in terms of regulation 53(l)(a) 1

Failed to register a vehicle whtch formed part of an estate Reg. 53(2) or that the registration certificate or valid vehlcle licence

did not accompany the vehicle concerned

Title holder failed to notify authority of change of title Reg. 53(3) holder and did not complete and forward the necessa

forms.

As owner of a vehicle, whereas there was a change of

Reg, 53(4) owner of such vehicle, failed to notify the applicable registering authority or did not identify the new owner of

I

the vehicle

As motor dealerdisplayed a motor vehicle for the purpose Reg. 53A of sale on his or her premises without such motor vehicle I

being registered into his or her name as dealer stock

As the owner of a vehicle which was stolen, failed to

Reg, 54(l)(a) report the theft to the South African Police Services within 24 hours after he or she became aware of such

I

theft

seven days after the day upon which he or she became

authority of such theft

As the title holder of a vehicle which was stolen, failed to Reg. 54(3)(a) notify the appropriate registering authority of such theft

withln three months after being notified of such theft I 1 1 °

As the title holder of a vehicle which was stolen, failed to Reg. 54(3)(b) submit the registration certificate of such vehicle and the I 10

notification to the appropriate registering authority

Owner of a recovered stolen vehicle (prior to

Reg, 54(6) deregistration). failed to notify the SAPS within 24 hours or the title holder and appropriate registering authority or

1 10 '

failed to apply for licensing of such vehicle

Owner of a vehicle, which became permanently unfit for Reg. 55(l)(a) use as a vehicle, failed to notify the title holder forthwith I 10

thereof

Owner of a vehicle, which became permanently unfit or ?eg. 55(l)(b) was permanently demolished, failed to notifv the I 10 316 I

lappropriate registering authority within three months I I Title holder of a vehicle, which became permanentlv unfit

317 Reg. 55(2)(a) or was permanently demolished. failed to notify the 1 10 1 appropriate registering authority within three months

Title holder failed to submit registration certificate or 318 Reg. 55(2)(b) notification to appropriate registering authority within 3 1 10 1 1

]months after vehicle became unfit.

I ]owner failed to notifv title holder or the reaisterinal I - - 319 1 Reg 55A(1) [authonty of impounding of vehicle or failed to submlt the1 I ( 10 1 1 1

[receipt to the SAPS. 1 1

STAATSKOERANT, 1 6 JULIE 2008 No. 31242 101

f SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I

Chassis number more than 17 or engine number more Reg. 56(1) than 20 characters or were not cut. stamped or

embossed on or permanently affixed to said vehicle I O l c

The title holderof a vehicle, which did not beara chassis number, failed to tender such vehicle to the SAPS I O I c I 1 I Title holder of a vehicle of which the chassis number

Reg. 56(3)(d) appearedon anothervehicle, failed to tender such vehicle 0 C to the SAPS

Reg. 56(3)(e) Title holder failed to report altered etc. enginelchassis number to SAPS

0 C

Title holder of a vehicle, which did not bear an engine- or Reg 56(5)(a) chassis number, failed to cause the issued number to be

cut, stamped, embossed or permanently affixed thereto I O I c Reg 56(7) 1 Title holder failed to not~fy registering authority of

clearance bv SAPS of ename or chassis number. I O I c Reg, 62(1)

Person concerned failed to furn~sh information i.r.0 an owned or pre-owned vehicle or vehicle body.

I 10

As accused. failed to furnish information to the aerson Reg. 62(2) concerned regarding any matter in respect of which he or I 10

she has a responsibility

Owner failed to notify authority of histher mtention to Reg 65 export a vehicle and did not submit a SAPS clearance.

I 10

As manufacturer, builder or mporter of vehicles, faded

Reg, 67 when disposing of such a vehicle, failed to furnish new title holder of such vehicle with the appropriat certificate

Reg, 68(1) Owner failed to hand over registration certificate to reaisterino authoritv or new title holder.

I 10 .. "

As owner of a vehicle, failed to hand over the registration Reg. 68(2) certificate issued under road traffic legislation to the title I 10

holder

art I: Motor trade numbers Operated a vehicle under a motor trade number whilst

Reg. 69(3) such operation was not for one of the purposes referredto I in Regulation 69

Operated a motor vehicle not intended to be registered in Reg. 69(4) the Republic in terms of provisions of this Act, under a I

motor trade number

As holder of a motor trade number, failed to register Reg. 73 motor trade number with the appropriate registering I

authority

Being the holder of a motor trade number failed to display Reg. 82(1) such motor trade number on a number plate or not in I

accordance with the provisions of regulation 35


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I .. I I r l

2 1 : 1 Short charge wording - reference to National Road e E T r a f k Act, 1996 P E

window is too small to display such number, in the (specified manner

l ~ o l d e r of a motor trade number failed to affix the mot01

front of a durable watertight holder

Reg, 82(4) Holder of a motor trade number affixed the numbel permanently to the vehicle

art 11: Temporary and special permits

Reg, 84(4) Holder of a special permit, conveyed personsor goods in the vehicle concerned

I 5 0 250

Operated motor vehicle not intended to be registered in Reg. 84(6) the RSA, under any permit, whilst such motor vehicle I 10 1 500

was not already registered in the RSA

Failed to display a special permit issued in respect of said Reg. 89(1) vehicle which has a rear window, in the correct manner I

so that the inscription was legible from the rear.

Failed to display a special permit on a vehicle which does Reg 89(1) not have a rear window, on the rear of such vehicle in a I

conspicuous place

Failed to display a temporary permit on a vehicle which

Reg, 89(l,(a) has a rear window, on the inside of such vehicle in the lower left-hand corner or that the inscription thereon was

I

not legible through the glass

Failed to display a temporary permit on a vehicle which Reg. 89(l)(b) does not have a rear window, on the rear of such vehicle I

in a consoicuous dace

Displayed a temporary or special permit on a vehicle, or Reg. 89(2) anything purporting to be such a permit, which was not 0 C

applicable to said vehicle

Reg, 89(3) A temporary permit was displayed on a vehicle which

lwas in any way obscured or had become illegible I I 1 10

-

Reg, 89(3) A special permit was displayed on a vehicle which was in any way obscured or had become illegible

I 10 1 500

tness of drivers RTA Chapter IV: Driving licence testing centres

109 1600 0 Sect,

RTA Chapter IV: Learner's and driving licences

111

112

Operated a driving licence testing centre which was not registered and graded 0

49(~)

49(~)

0

1700

1701

1702

C 6 0

Sect, 12(a)

Sect, 2(a)

Sect. 12(a)

0

Operated a vehicle contrary to the class of vehicle to which such driving licence relates

Operated a vehicle contrary to the conditions as endorsed by the examiner for driving licences

Operated a vehicle without an A1 code driving licence issued to him or her. or of any document deemed to be a driving licence

0

1

1

1

1250

1250

1250

25

25

25

625

625

625

4

4

4

625

625

625


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I

)perated a vehicle without an A code driving licence ;sued to him or her, or of any document deemed to be a I Sect. 12(a) riving licence

berated a vehicle without a B code driving licence) Sect. 12(a) ;sued to him or her, or of any document deemed to be a I

riving licence

Iperated a vehicle without a C1 code driving licence sued to him or her, or of any document deemed to be a I Sect. 12(a) rivino licence I

Sect. 12(a)

Sect. 12(a)

)perated a vehicle without a C code drlving licence1 ;sued to h ~ m or her, or of any document deemed to be a/ I riving licence

berated a vehicle without a EB an code drivina licencel ;sued to him or her, or of any document deemed to be a1 I riving licence

lperated a vehicle without an EC1 code driving licence) Sect. 12(a) ,sued to him or her. or of anv document deemed to be a1 I

riving licence

lperated a vehicle without an EC code driving licence sued to him or her, or of any document deemed to be a I rivina licence

Sect. 12(a)

Sect. 12(b)

Sect. 16(1)

perated a motor vehicle whilst he or she did not keepa riving licence, or document or any other prescribed I uthorization, in the said vehicle

pplied for a learnetsor driving licence, and wilfully failed1 I disclose any disqualification to which he or she was I ~bject

ecoming disqualified from holding a drwing licence, iled to within a period of 21 days afler such, submit the I xurnent to the MEC of the province concerned

lilfully or negligently and contrary to this Section (a) sued a driving licence (b) authorized the issue thereofor 0 ) endorsed it or failed to endorse it

s holder of a licence, with a permanent change of ,sideme, failed to, within 14 days after such change, M y the applicable registering authority ~n the prescribed anner

nployed or permitted another person to drive such !hide while the said driver did not have drwing licence

I sued under Chapter IV of Act no. 93 of 1996 to drive ~ c h vehicle

Sect. 16(2)

Sect. 18(5)

Sect. 22

Sect. 31

L

Irt II: Learner's and driving licences

Reg. 99(2)(a) person with a licence authorizing him or her to drive ihe lvehicle

]vehicle RWC

Reg, 99(2)(b) Operated a motor cycle as holder of a learner's lkence while carrying another person on such motor cycle

49(d) Reg. 99(2)(a)

1 I I Holder of a learner's licence was not accompanied by a1 1 1 I

I RTA Chapter IV

I

I I I I I I I I

Sect. 3211) 1 Operated a vehicle of a prescribed class without a ~rofessional drivina ~ermit issued to him or her

Holder of a learner's licence was not accompanied by a person with a licence authorizing him or her to drive the 25 I

0

'rofessional driving permit

Reg. 99(2)(c)

Sect, 32(1)

4

AS holder of a learner's l~cence carried persons for reward thereon

20

Operated a goods vehicle contrary to the conditions of a professional driving permit issued to him or her

1250

1000 1 3

1

625

500

25 4 1250

625

500


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, I

1 4 1 Short charge wording - reference to National Road ?! Traffic Act, 1996

Operated a minibus conveying > 12 persons, contrary tc Sect. 32(1) the conditions of a professional driving permit issued tc

him or her.

Sect, 32(1) Conveyed personsfor reward contrary to the conditions o a professional driving permit issued to him or her.

Conveyed persons for reward or NLTTA, contrary to the Sect. 32(1) conditions of a professional dr~ving permit issued to him

or her. Operated a vehicle, carrying dangerous goods, contrab

Sect. 32(1) to the conditions of a professionaldriving permit issued tc him or her

Operated a vehicle conveying > 12 persons, contrary tc

When charged with an offence in terms this Act, refusec

at the time of the hearing

rt IV: Professional driving permit As holder of a suspended or cancelled professions

Reg. 123(2) driving permit, failed to submit the card on which the 1 20 3 1000 500 500 0 permit appears, to the registrar or clerk of the court

Being tn charge or control of a vehicle, employed or Reg. 124(a) permitted a person to drive the vehicle without a PrDP of 1 25 4 1250 625 625 49(c)

the appropriate category

Reg. 124(b) Being the holderof a professionaldriving permit, allowed another person to use such permit

0 C 6 0 0 0 0

itness of vehicles RTA Chapter V: Testing stations, roadworthy certificates and certification of roadworthiness

144 2100 Sect. 37 Operated an unregistered and non- graded testing statio C 6 0 0 0 0

RTA Chapter V: Roadworthiness of vehicles I 1 I I I I I I I I

145 I 2200 1 S&t 42(1) Operated motor vehicle with a gross vehicle mass ore

3500 kilograms which was not in a roadworthy condition 1 I I 2 0 1 3

l l o o o l 500 I 500 1 4 9 ~ )

Operated motor vehicle with a gross vehicle mass under 14' 1 2201 / Sect 42(1) 13500 kilogramswhich was not in a roadworthy condit~on I I I Is 1 1 ( 375 I 1 49(d) I I I I I I I I

147 1 2202 1 Sect. 42A IFailed to display roadworthy certificate I I I 1 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 1 250 1 250 1 0 I I I I I I I I I I

Failed to comply with the directions of traffic officer or 148 I 2203 I / 15 1 2 1 7 5 0 1 375 ( 375 1 0 Sect. 44(1) examinerof vehicles that the sa~d vehicle is unroadworthy I I 1 and not to be used on a public road. Non-RWC

I I I I I I I I I I

RTR Chapter VI Part II: Equipment on or in respect of motor vehicles 1 I l ~a i led to present vehicle registered on or after 15 ~ u l y l 1 1 I

1987, equipped with full air brakes for testing or which 14' I 2300 I Reg 140(2)(c) 1was not fitted with test connections or not in m o d ' I I lworkino order - I 1 1 1 1 I I


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008


Reg. 141(8) lemoved, altered etc. components of vehicle affecting its ~adworthiness.

)perated a vehicle with a GVM exceeding 3 50C ilograms, without the required roadworthy certificate

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1)

merated a vehicle. beina a breakdown vehicle. withoul le required roadworthy certificate

lperated a bus without the required roadworth)

perated a minibus with a GVM exceeding 3 500 lograms, without the required roadworthy certificate

perated a minibus conveying more than 12 persons, cluding the driver, without the required roadworth) prtificate

Reg. 142(1) perated a vehicle which was conveying persons for !ward, without the required roadworthy certificate

perated a vehicle in terms of the NLTTA, without the !quired roadworthy certificate

perated a vehicle transporting dangerousgoods, without e required roadworthy certificate

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1)

Reg. 142(1) perated a vehicle conveying more than 12 persons. ithout the required roadworthy certificate

ailed to take specified vehicle for RWC-test

NRTR Ch I=- art Ill: Equipment on or in respect of vehicles Operated a vehicle on a public road which was not

Reg. 149 equipped with an emergency brake or parking brake. Non I 15 2 750 375 375 RWC.

Operated a vehicle on a public road which was not Reg. 149 lequipped with an emergency brake or parking brake.1 I I 20 1 3 I 1000 I 500 1 500

RWC.

Operated a vehicle, registered on or after 1 July 1990, Reg. 149A fitted with anti-thefl device which interfered with braking I 10 1 500

system. Non-RWC.

Operated a vehicle, registered on or after 1 July 1990. Reg. 149A fitted with anti-theft device which interfered with braking I 15 2 750

system. RWC.

Reg. 150 Operated motor cycle, tricycle or quadrucycle w~th inefficient braking system service brake

I 10

Reg, 150 Operated motor cycle, tricycle or quadrucycle with inefficient braking system emergency brake

I 10 1 500 250 250

I I I I I I I

independent braking system on front and lor rear wheels.

Operated a trailer not exceeding 750kg, GVM not

with parking brakeldevice to keep trailer stationary.

Operated a trailer not exceeding 750kg, GVM exceeding Reg. 151(l)(a)(ii) half of tare of drawing vehicle, not equipped with parking I 15 2 750 375 375

brake and serviceloverrun brake.

Operated a trailer not exceeding 750 kg. GVM exceeding I Reg. 15l(l)(a)(iii) half of tare of the drawing vehicle. not equipped with 1 20 3 1000 500 500

parking and service brake.

Operated a trailer exceeding 750kg but d ~ d not exceed Reg. 151 (l)(b)(i) 3500kg. GVM not exceeding tare of drawing vehicle, not I 15 2 750 375 375

equipped with parking or service brake



Operated a trailer exceeding 750kg but not exceedin! 7eg. 151(l)(b)(i) 3500kg, GVM not exceedingtare of drawing vehicle, no

equipped wlth parking brake and overrunlservlce brake

Operated a trailer of which the GVM exceeded tare o Reg. 151(l)(c) drawing vehicle or 3500 kg. not equipped with parkin~

I brake and service brake

, , , loperated trailer but could not operate its service brake in n s y . I J I\L,

\drawing vehicle while in motion

Qpn ,,, loperated pedal cycle not equipped with brakelbrakesor ..-J. Irear wheels loperated a vehicle (no specified braking svster

Reg. 153 prescribed) not equipped with barking brake o;de&e to keep vehicle stationary

Operated (after 1 January 1995) goods vehicle, GVM

Reg, 54(1 ) exceeding 3500kg. registered after 1 January 1986, which did not comply with the standard specificationsfor braking.

Operated (after 1 January 1995) bus, GVM exceedinc Reg. 154(1) 3500kg, registered after 1 January 1986, which did not

comply with the standard specifications for braking.

Operated (after 1 January 1995) minibus, GVM

Reg, 54(,) exceeding 3500kg, registered after 1 January 1986, which did not comply with the standard specifications for brakino

Operated (after 1 January 1995) tractor registered after 1 Reg. 154(1) January 1986. which did not comply with the standard

swecifications for brakinct.

the standard speclficatlons for brakmg

Reg, 154(3) Operated a minibus, midibus or bus that did not comply with the requirements of the Type II test

1 loperated a combination of vehicles which could exceed

braking performance. Reg. 155. Table A. Non-RWC

Operated a combination of vehicles which could exceed

braking performance. Reg. 155. Table A. RWC

Operated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which could not exceed 40kmlh but did not comply with

Reg. 155(l)(a)(ii) requirements of braking performance when the service brake was applied at maximum speed. Table B. Non- RWC

Operated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which

Reg 155(l)(a)(ii) could not exceed 40kmlh but did not comply with requirements of braking performance when the service I

brake was applied at maximum speed. Table B. RWC

Operated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which could exceed 4Okmlh but did not comply with the

Reg. 155(l)(b)(i) requirements of braking performance when the I emergency brake was applied at a speed of 40 kwh. Table C. Non-RWC

STAATSKOERANT, 16 JULIE 2008 No.31242 107

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I 4 1 5


)perated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which ould exceed 40kmlh but did not comply with the squirements of braking performance when the I mergency brake was applied at a speed of 40 kmlh. 'able C. RWC

Reg. 155(l)(b)(i)

)perated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which ould not exceed 40kdh but did not comply with the squirements of braking performance when the I mergency brake was applied at maximum speed Table I. Non-RWC

Reg. 155(l)(b)(ii)

)perated a vehicle or combination of vehicles which ould not exceed 4Okdh but did not comply with the ~quirements of brakmg performance when the I mergency brake was applied at maximum speed. Table 1. RWC

Reg. 155(l)(b)(ii)

Iperated a vehicle or combination of vehicles but was capable of keeping the vehicles stationary at all times 'hen the parking brake was applied on a gradient of not

Reg. 155(l)(c)

Reg 155(l)(c)

lore than one in 8.33. Non-RWC I merated a vehicle or combination of vehicles but was1 capable of keeping the veh~cles stationary at all times I 'hen the parking brake was applied on a gradient of not lore than one in 8.33 RWC

l~erated a vehicle with a brake that was not in aood , Reg 156(l)(a)

orking order. Non-RWC I

perated a vehicle with a brake that was not in good] , Reg. 156(l)(a) orking order. RWC

tensity on the wheels symmetrically placed In relation to le longitudinallcentre-lineof the vehicle when the brake as applied. Non-RWC

Reg. 156(l)(b)

perated a veh~cle that did not act tensity on the wheels symmetrically e longitudinallcentre-line of the vehicle when the brak as applied. RWC

Reg. 156(l )(b)

perated a vehicle that was not fitted with a dev~ce in the 'iver's compartment that warned the driver of incorrect r or vacuum pressure when applying the service brake

I

aking the brake incapable of stopping the vehicle.

perated a vehicle draw~ng another vehicle which was ~t fitted with a device which could warn the driver that I e service brake was not in good working order

Reg. 156(2)

Reg 156(3)

Reg. 157(l)(a) perated a vehicle wlth a damaged lamp that was isecured or incapable of bemg lighted. Non-RWC

Reg. 157(l)(a)

Reg. 157(l)(a)

perated a vehicle w~th damaged lamps that were isecured or incapable of being lighted. Non-RWC

I

perated a vehicle with a damaged lamp that was I secured or incapable of being lighted RWC

Reg. 157(l)(a) perated a vehicle with damaged lamps or lamps that I ere unsecured or incapable of bemg lighted. RWC I perated a vehicle between sunset and sunrise or in ifavourablewnditions but failed to switch on the head,

I ar and registration lamps being indiscernible for a stance of 150m.

Reg. 157(l)(b)

108 NO. 31242 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 JULY 2008

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, I I

- 8 - 0

2 K

0 - m C

P

a, - 2 a

L c .- 0 E

P - 250

- 750

-

500

-

500

- 500

750

-

250

- 500

- 150

- ioo - ioo

- '50

-

i00

- 150

- 150

Short charge wording - reference to National Road TraMc Act. 1996

lperated a motor cycle, motor cycle with side car, icycle or quadrucycle but did not switch on the heac Imps between sunrise 1 sunset. lperated a motor cycle, motorcycle with side car, tricycle r quadrucycle but did not switch on the head lamps etween sunset I sunrise

ailed to extinguish the main beam of the light emitted by le head lamp of such vehicle when such main bean )uld have caused a dangerousglare to oncoming traffic

Reg. 157(2)

Reg. 157(2)

Reg. 157(3)

on-RWC

ailed to extinguish the main beam of the hoht emitted bv e head lamp of such vehicle when such main bean )uld have caused a dangerousglare to oncoming traffic. wc perated a vehicle but failed to fit any lamps or use any mps with sufficient brilliance vis~ble from 150 m. Non- WC

Reg. 157(3)

Reg. 158(2)

Reg. 158(2) perated a vehicle but failed to fit any lamps or use any mps with sufficient brilliance visible from 150 m. RWC

Reg. 158(2) prated a vehicle fitted with one lamp not emitting a ~ h t of sufficient brilliance visible from at least 150 m. on-RWC

Reg. 158(2)

Reg. 159(l)(a)

perated a vehicle fitted with one lamp not emitting a h t of sufficient brilliance visible from at least 150 m. NC perated a vehicle equipped with only one correct lamp ~pable of emitting the mainldipped beam required. Non- wc ~erated a vehicle equipped with only one correct lamp ~pable of emitting the mainldipped beam required. NC

3erated a vehicle that was not equipped with head nps capable of emitting the mainldipped beams quired. Non-RWC 2erated a vehicle that was not equipped with head nps capable of emitting the mainldipped beams quired. RWC

9erated a motor cycle without a side car, tricycle with1 le front wheel that was not equipped with oneltwo head nps capable of emltting the mamldipped beams quired

lerated a motor cycle with side car that was not uipped with oneltwo head lamps as prescribed in Reg i

--

Reg 159(l)(a)

Reg. 159(l)(a)

Reg. 1 59(l)(a)

i e g 159(l)(b)

eg. 159(l)(c)(ii) )crated a motor cycle with s~de car, the side car not mplying with provisions (parkinglhead lamps)

lerated a vehicle fitted with only one head I parking np. (Reg. 164) illuminating surface not more than I Omm from edge of the front of vehicle. Non-RWC

Reg. 159(2)

mrated a vehicle not fitted with any head I parking nps. (Reg. 164) illuminating surface not more than I Omm from edge of the front of vehicle. Non-RWC

220

~erated a vehicle fitted with only one head I parking np. (Reg. 164) illuminating surface not more than I Omm from edge of the front of vehicle. RWC

Reg. 159(2)

2371 Reg. 159(2)

STAATSKOERANT, 16 JULIE 2008 NO. 31242 109

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I

- 11

-&--

5 ; f 5 r:

2 m E 0 E * + - s B g." z - 2 ; 'sf 0 - 49W)

- 0

- 0

- 8 - 0

2 x 2 c C w - m

0

a C - 2 c C -

750

- 250

- 500

- 500

750

- 250

-

500

- i00

-

'50

- ioo

-

'50

-

!50

- i00

Operated a vehide and failed to fit two head I park in^ Reg. 159(2) lamps. (Reg. 164) illuminating surface not more thar

400mm from edge of the front of vehicle. RWC

I Non-RWC

loperated a vehicle registered on or afler 01101102 whilst Reg. 159(3) a mainldipped beam did not comply with SANS 1046. I.,

Operated a vehicle registered on or after 01101102 whilst Reg. 159(3) the mainld~pped beamsd~d not comply with SANS 1046. lRWC

operated a vehicle with a main-beam not so adjusted and Reg. 160(a) maintained to be capable of emitting adequate light for

driver to see at least 100 metres ahead. Non-RWC

Operated a vehicle wlth all main-beams not so adjusted Reg. 160(a) and maintained to be capable of emitting adequate light

for driver to see at least 100 metres ahead. Non-RWC

Operated a vehicle with a maln-beam not so adjusted and Reg. 160(a) maintained to be capable of emitting adequate light for

driver to see at least 100 metres ahead. RWC

Operated a vehicle with all main-beams not so adjusted Reg 160(a) and maintained to be capable of emitting adequate light

for driver to see at least 100 metres ahead. RWC

Operated a vehicle with all head lamps not capable of

Reg, 160(b) being switched to a dipped beam positionand this dipped beam being kept in this posibon for a continuous period of time. Non-RWC

Operated a vehicle with a head lamp emitting a dipped

calculated according to the regulation. Non-RWC

Operated a vehicle with all head lamps emitting a dipped Reg 161(1) beam not capableof projecting the prescribed pattern or

calculated according to the regulation. Non-RWC

loperated a vehicle with a head lamp emitting a dipped1 Reg. 161(1) beam not capable of projecting the prescribed pattern or 1 235 1 2386 I I calculated according to the regulation. RWC

Operated a vehicle with all head lamps emitting a dipped Reg. 161(1) beam not capable of projecting the prescribed pattern or ( 236 / 2387 1 1

calculated according to the regulation. RWC

110 No.31242 GOVERNMENT GAZElTE, 16 JULY 2008

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I C I

Short charge wording - reference to National Road Trafflc Act, 1996

)perated a vehicle with one head lamp emitting a dippec earn not capable of projecting a symmetrical pattem etc nd the intense part of the beam did not slant downwardr

strike the road surface within a distance not exceedin( 5m. Non-RWC.

lperated a vehicle with head lamps emitting a dippec eam not capable of projecting a symmetrical pattem etc. nd the intense part of the beam did not slant downwards I strike the road surface within a distance not exceeding 5m. Non-RWC.

Reg. 161 (3)

Reg. 161 (3)

lperated a vehicle with one head lamp emitting a dippec earn not capable of projecting a symmetrical pattem etc. nd the intense part of the beam did not slant downwards I strike the road surfacewithin a distance not exceeding 5m. RWC

Reg. 161(3)

prated a vehicle with head lamps emttting a dipped ?am not capable of projecting a symmetrical pattem etc. i d the intense part of the beam did not slant downwards I strike the road surface within a distance not exceeding 5m RWC

Reg. 161 (3)

perated a vehicle with one head lamp emitting a dipped ?am not capable of adequately illuminating an area so !at the driver can see 45m ahead of vehicle. Non-RWC

Reg. 161 (4)(a)

Reg. 161(4)(a) perated a vehicle with all head lamps emitting a dipped ?am not capable of adequately illuminating an area so at the driver can see 45m ahead of vehicle Non-RWC

perateda vehicle with one head lamp emitting a dipped ?am not capable of adequately illuminating an area so at the driver can see 45m ahead of vehicle. RWC

Reg. 161(4)(a)

perated a vehicle with all head lamps emitting a dipped ?am not capable of adequately illuminating an area so at the driver can see 45m ahead of vehicle. RWC

perateda vehicle but failed to adjust one head lamp (dip ?am) so that it was not dangerous to on-coming traffic.

Reg. 161(4)(a)

Reg. 161(4)(b) m-RWC

perated a vehide but failed to adjust all head lamps ( d i ~ Reg. 161(4)(b)

' " I

!am) so that they were not dangerous to on-coming affic. Non-RWC

perated a vehicle but failed to adjust one head lamp (dip !am) so that it was not dangerous to on-coming traffic. NC

Reg. 161(4)(b)

Reg. 161(4)(b)

Reg. 161(4)(c)

perated a vehicle but failed to adjust head lamps (dip !am) so that it was dangerous to on-comlng traffic., NC

=rated a veh~de but failed to adjust a head lamp1 :cording to Reg 161(1) and (3) so that the dipped beam !flected to the right. Non-RWC I

Reg. 161(4)(c) 3erated a vehide but failed to adjust head lamps ~cordina to Reo. 16 l ( l ) and (3) so that the di~Ded beam . . !flectedto theight. N&-RWC

aerated a vehide but faded to adjust a head lamp Reg. 161(4)(c) cording to Reg. 161 (1) and (3) so that the dipped beak

!fleeted to the right. RWC



)perat& a vehicle but failed to adjust head lamp! wording to Reg. 161(1) and (3) so that the dipped bean Reg. 161(4)(c)

Reg. 161A(2)(a)

eflected to the right. RWC 'ehicle with a daytime runninQ lamp fitted less than 25C iillimetres or more than 1.5; above ground level. Non !WC

Reg. 161A(2)(a) 'ehicle with daytime running lamps fitted less than 25C iillimetres or more than 1,5m above ground level. Non, wc

Reg. 161A(2)(a) 'ehicle with a daytime running lamp fitted less than 25C iillimetres or more than 1.5m above ground level. RWC

Reg. 161A(2)(a)

Reg. 161A(2)(b)

'ehicle with daytime running lamps fitted less than 25C ~illimetres or more than 1,5m above ground level. RWC

lperated a vehicle with a daytime running lamp which id cause discomfort to the driver of the vehicle. Non. WC

Reg. 161A(2)(b) perated a vehicle with daytime running lamps which did u s e discomfort to the driver of the vehicle. Non-RWC

Reg. 161A(2)(b)

Reg. 161A(2)(b)

perated a vehicle with a daytime running lamp which d cause discomfort to the driver of the vehicle. RWC

perated a vehicle with daytime running lamps which did u s e discomfort to the driver of the vehicle. RWC

perated a vehicle whilst the rear lamps were not on at e same time as the daytime running lamps or that these lytime running lamps did not switch off automatically hen the head lamps were switched on. Non-RWC

Reg. 161A(3)

perated a vehicle whilst the rear lamps were not on at e same time as the daytime running lamps or that these aytime running lamps did not switch off automatically ien the head lamps were switched on. RWC

:owed or parked a vehicle but did not dip the beam of

Reg. 161A(3)

--

Reg 162(a)

Reg. 162(a)

eheadlparkmg lamp. Non-RWC :opped or parked a vehicle but did not dip the beam of e'headloakkino l a m . RWC 1

Reg. 162(b) i

Reg. 162(b)

Reg. l63( l )

Reg 163(1)

opped or parked a vehicle on a publ~c road and v~tched off the head lamps without sw~tching on the glparking lamps. Non-RWC

opped or parked a vehicle on a public road and (itched off the head lamps without switching on the alparking lamps. RWC

serated a vehicle on which too manv fronurear lamps ?re mounted. Lamps also displayed in the wrong tsition. Non-RWC

?re mounted. Lamps also displaved in the wrong . . loosition. RWC - 1 loperated a vehicle on which the front fog lamps were

Reg. 163(2)(a) incorrectly adjusted and could only emit a dipped beam. I INon-RWC I loperated a vehicle on which the front fog lamps were)

Reg. 163(2)(a) lincorrectly adjusted and could only emit ad,pped beam.1 I I

112 N0.31242 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 JULY 2008

SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I ti-


Reg. 163(2)(b) )perated a vehicle on a public road with front and real ,g lamp or lamps that could be brought into operatior euaratelv. Non-RWC

Reg. 163(2)(b)

Reg. 163(3)(a)

)perated a vehicle on a public road with front and real )g lamp or lamps that could be brought into operatior eparately. RWC

berated a vehicle with the front foo lamu's hiohest ~ o i n l uminating the surface being higher than that of a heaa Imp. Non-RWC

lperated a vehicle with the front fog lamp's highest point uminating the surface being higher than that of a head tmo RWC

Reg. 163(3)(a)

lperated a vehicle with the rear fog lamp's lowestlhigher oints illuminating the surface not complying with the rovisions of the regulations. Non-RWC

Reg. 163(3)(b)

lperated a vehicle with the rear fog lamp's lowestlhighes 3ints illuminating the surface not complying with the rovisions of the regulations. RWC

lperateda vehicle fitted with fog and parking larnpllamps at were incapable of functioning simultaneously. Non- wc

perated a vehicle fitted with fog and parking larnpllamps at were incapable of functioning simultaneously. RWC

Reg. 163(3)(b)

Reg. 163(4)(a)

Reg. 163(4)(a)

perated a vehicle fitted with two fog lamps in front, ~rt ion of the illuminating surface of these lamps being rther than 400mm from the outer edge of the front of tht thicle. Parking lamps also not compliant by not being i e to be switched on simultaneously with fog lamps. on-RWC I

Reg. 163(4)(b)

perated a vehicle fitted with two fog lamps in front. xtion of the illuminating surface of these lamps being/ rther than 400mm from the outer edge of the front of thc ?hick Parking lamps also not compliant by not being Ile to be switched on simultaneously with fog lamps. wc

Reg. 163(4)(b)

perated a motor cycle with a side car. Only the motor cle being fitted with a fog lamp or s~de car not equipped

Reg. 163(5) th a parking lamp or not capable of functioning rnultaneously with fog lamp if fitted w~th one I perated a motor cycle with a side car fitted with a fog mp. Motor cycle did not have a foglparking lamp that ~uld be brought into operation simultaneously with fog rnp of side car.

Reg. 163(5)

Reg. 163(6) 1 perated a vehicle with the fog lamps on, whilst the sibility was good. Non-RWC

I

perated a vehicle with the fog lamps on, whilst the I

jibility was good. RWC

9erated a vehicle with one parking lamp (front or rear) bt fitted on the right side of vehicle. Non-RWC

I

3erated a vehicle with one parking lamp (front or rear) I

~t fitted on the riaht side of vehicle. RWC

Reg. 163(6) ~ Reg. l64(3)(a)



Short charge wording -reference to National Road Traffic Act, 1996

lperated a vehicle with two parking lamps which weri ositioned incorrectly. Portion of the illuminating surfact 'as not further than 400mm from outer edge of vehicle on-RWC

perated a vehicle with two parking lamps which wen ~sitioned incorrectly. Portion of the illuminating surfact as not further than 400mm from outer edge of vehicle wc

Reg. 164(3)(b)

Reg. 164(3)(b)

t 0 P* 01 frj - 0 PC of f r~ - 0 W

SL

01 115 - 01 WI

SL

OL

lQ

01 WI SU

OL

llg - 01 wi

outer edges of the vehlcle No parkmg lamps were kept hghted on that slde of the veh~cle RWC lSU

perated a vehicle registered before01107/1990 with twc arking iamps wh~ch were positioned incorrectly. Portior ' the illuminating surface was not further than 500mm om outer edge of veh~cle. Non-RWC

Reg. 164(3)(b)

perated a vehicle registered before01107/1990 with twc nrking lamps which were pos~tioned incorrectly. Portior ' the illuminating surface was not further than 500mm mn outer edge of vehicle RWC

Reg. 164(3)(b)

perated a vehicle which did not have a head lamp hlch was so placed that the portion of ~ts illurnmating lrface from the centre line was within 400mm from the Jter edge of the vehicle. No parking iamps were kepi lhted on that side of the vehicle Non-RWC

perated a vehicle which did not have head lamps which are so placed that the portion of the illuminating ~rfaces from the centre line was within 400mm from the fter edges of the vehicle. No parking lamps were kept hted on that side of the vehicle. Non-RWC

Reg. 165(1)

Reg 165(1)

Derated a vehicle which did not have a head lamp iich was so placed that the portion of its illurntnating trface from the centre line was within 400mm from the ~ter edge of the vehicle. No parking lamps were kept hted on that side of the veh~cle. RWC

Jerated a veh~cle which did not have head lamps which ?re so placed that the portion of the illuminating rfacesfrom the centre l~ne was within 400mm from the

Reg. 165(1)

Reg. 165(1)

I

Operated a vehicle on a publ~c road of whtch only the Reg. 165(2) parking lamps were lighted while such vehicle was in

Imotion. Non-RWC

]operated a vehicle on a public road of which only the parklng lamps were Ihghted wh~le such vehlcle was In motton RWC

Operated a vehicle with only one front position lamp on' one side of the widest part of a vehicle, combination of

Reg. 166(1) veh~cles or any load projected more than 400mm beyond the illuminating surface which was visible from the front. Non-RWC

Operated a vehicle with no position lamps on either side of the widest part of a vehicle, combinat~on of vehicles or

Reg. 166(1) any load projected more than 400mm beyond the illuminating surface which were visible from the front. Non-RWC


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I


t C 0 vi tt R - 0 01 a1 ill frs - 0 ti1 nc R - 0 tir nc - 0 tir fit - 0 tir fit - 0 th U:

R' - 01 th CC

- 01 th, U:

R\ - 01 thl M -

)perated a vehicle with only one front position lamp or ne side of the widest part of a vehicle, combination 0

ehicles or any load projected more than 400mm beyonc le illuminating surface which was visible from the front wc

Reg. 166(1)

- ~ - -- - -

lperated a vehicle with no position lamps on either side f the widest part of a vehicle, combination of vehicles or ny load projected more than 400mm beyond the uminating surfaceor the lamps were not visible from the ont. RWC

perated a vehicle on a public road registered for the first ne prior to 1 January 1985 with a front-position lamp 31 fitted as high as possible above ground level. Non- wc

perated a vehicle on a public road registeredfor the first ne prior to 1 January 1985 with a front-position lamp )t fitted as high as possible above ground level. RWC

Reg. 166(1)

Reg. 166(2)(a)

Reg. 166(2)(a)

perated a vehicle on a public road registeredfor the first ne prior to 1 January 1985 with front-position lamps not ted as high as possible above ground level. Non-RWC

Reg. 166(2)(a)

perated a vehicle on a public road registeredfor the first ne prior to 1 January 1985 with front-position lamps not ted as high as possible above ground level. RWC

perated a vehicle, combination of vehicles or any load ereon which was fitted with a front position lamp not mplying with the width and height requirements. Non- INC

Reg. 166(2)(a)

Reg. 166(2)(a)

perated a vehicle, combination of vehicles or any load ereon which was fitted with a front position lamp not mplymg with the width and height requirements. RWC

Reg. 166(2)(a)

~erated a vehicle, combination of vehicles or any load ereon which was fitted with fmnt position lamps which ~mplied with the width and height requirements. Non- NC

Reg. 166(2)(a)

oerated a vehicle, combination of vehicles or any load ereon which was fitted with front position lamps which ~mplied with the width and height requirements. RWC

Reg. 166(2)(a)

Jerated a trailer etc, with a front-position lamp in the1 ~ n g place. Non-RWC ,crated a trailer etc. with a front-position lamp in the .ong place RWC 3erated a trailer etc. with front-position lamps in the ong place. Non-RWC )crated a trailer etc, with front-~osltion lamps in the

Reg. 166(2)(b) l ~ r o n t position lamps did not emit a white light. N ~ ~ - R W C / I

I

,

-

Reg. 166(2)(b) Front position lamp did not emit white light. RWC I

Reg. 166(2)(b) I ~ r o n t position lamps did not emit a white light. RWC ] I

Reg. 166(2)(b) Front position lamp did not emit white light. Non-RWC

I

I

116 No.31242 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 JULY 2008

I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I

- 8 - D

2 X

b - u

2.' 3 - u

u

2 C - 0 c 2.' -

500

750

-

500

750

- 500

- 750 - 250 - 500 - 500

750 - 250 - 500 - 500 - '50 !50 - ioo

ioo ' - '50

1

!50


Reg. 168(l)(c)

Reg. 168(l)(c)

!ear lamps fitted higher than 2.1171 from ground leve ecause the structure of the vehicle not according tc tandards. Non-RWC

!ear lamps fitted hiQher than 2.lm from around leve ecause the structure of the vehicle not according tc tandards RWC

:ear lamp on vehicle, registered for the first time befon 1/01/1981, incorrectly fitted as far as height is oncerned and as far as colour and intensity of light are

Reg. 168(2)

Reg, l68(2)

oncerned. Non-RWC

ear lamo on vehicle, reaistered for the first time before , " 1/01/1981, incorrectly fitted as far as height is ~ncerned and as far as colour and intensity of light a n mcerned. RWC

Reg. 168(3) lotor cycle/tricycle not fitted with at least one red lamp mitting red light - 2 candelas), incorrectly positionedon (cle. ehicle towed by breakdown vehicle not fitted with real

Reg. 168(5) mps nlv one stoo lamo fitted on one side of vehicle at the

Reg. 169(1) , . !ar. Non-RWC. too lamos not fitted on each side of vehcle at the rear.

Reg. 169(1)

Reg. 169(1) nly one stop lamp fitted on one side of vehicle at the !ar. RWC. top lamps not fitted on each side of vehicle at the rear.

Reg. 169(1)

Reg. 169(l)(a)

wc ne stop lamp obscured or not visible from rear. Non- wc

Reg. 169(l)(a) ne stop lamp obscured or not visible from rear. RWC

Reg. 169(l)(a)

Reg. 169(l)(a)

?eg. 169(l)(a)(i)

top lamps obscured or not visible from rear. Non-RWC

!op lamps obscured or not visible from rear. RWC top lamp not visible within angles of 45 degrees. Non- wvc

leg. 169(l)(a)(i) :op lamp not visible within angles of 45 degrees. RWC

:op lamps not visible within angles of 45 degrees. Non- wvc

:op lamps not visible within angles of 45 degrees RWC

op lamp not visible within angles of 15 degrees. NOW ac

op lamp not visible within angles of 15 degrees. RWC

op lamp not visible within angles of 15 degrees. RWC

leg. 169(l)(a)(ii), op lamps not vis~ble within angles of 15 degrees RWCI

eg. 169(l)(a)(ii) 1 op lamp less than 750mm from ground not visible'

thin an angle of 5 degrees. on-RWC op lamps less than 750mrn from ground, not v~s~ble thin an angle of 5 degrees. RWC


- 8

b - m 0 n 0 - 2

$ - 2 E

n - 250 - 500 - 500 - 750 - 250

500

250 - 500 - 500 - 750 - 500 - 500 - 500 - '50 - !50 - ioo - ioo - '50 - i00

- '50 p

2514 Reg, 169(l)(b) Stop lamp fitted less than 300mm or higher than 2,lm from ground level. Non-RWC.

Reg, 169(l)(b) Stop lamp fitted less than 300mm or higher than 2,lm from ground level. RWC Stop lamps fitted less than 300mm or higher than 2,lm

Reg' 169(1)(b) from ground level. Non-RWC.

2517 Reg, 169(l)(b) Stop lamps fitted less than 300mm or higher than 2,lm from around level. RWC Stop lamps not equidistanthot on each side of centre.

2518 1 Reg. 169(l)(c) (line

Stop lamps not equidistanffnot on each side of centre. 2519 1 Reg. 169(l)(c) Iline RWc

Light intensity emitted by stop lamp not greater than lighl 2520 Reg' 169(1)(d)

emitted by rear lamps. Non-RWC

2521 Reg, 169(l)(d) Light intensity emitted by stop lamp not greater than light emitted by rear lamps. RWC

2522 I Reg 169(1)(d) / Light intensity emitted by stop lamps not greater than liaht em~tted bv rear lamos. Non-RWC

I I - 2523 Reg, 169(1)(d)

Light intensity emitted by stop lamps not greater than liaht emitted bv rear lamos. RWC Stop lamp not emitting a red light when In use. Non-

2524 1 Reg. 169(l)(d) IRwc 2525 Reg. 169(1)(d) Stop lamp not emitting a red lightwhen in use. RWC

2526 Reg, 169(l)(d) Stop lamps not emitting a red light when in use. Non- D I A I ~

2527 Reg. 169(l)(d) Istop lamps not emitting a red light when in use. RWC

2528 Reg, 169(l)(d) Stop lamp not visible from 30 metres when in use. Non- R WC

2529 Reg. 169(l)(d) Stop lamp not visible from 30 metres when In use. RWC

2530 Reg, 169(l)(d) Stop lamps not visible from 30 metres when in use. Non- RWC

2531 1 Reg. 169(l)(d) Istop lamps not visible from 30 metres when in use. RWC

Stop lamps incorrectly fitted so that operating device ofj 2532 1 Reg. 169(1)(e) Ibrake of vehicle/towing vehide did not operate when1

activated. Non-RWC

Stop lamps incorrectly fitted so that operating device of Reg. 169(l)(e) brake of vehicle/towing vehicle did not operate when

activated. RWC

Reg. 169(1)(fJ Stop lamp not clean / in working condition. Non-RWC

2535 1 Reg. 169(1)(0 ~ S ~ O D lamp not clean 1 in working condition. RWC 1 2536 Reg. 169(l)(fJ Stop lamps not clean 1 in working condition. Non-RWC

2537 1 Rea. 169f1)(0 IS~OD lamos not clean / in working condition. RWC

2538 Reg, 169(2) Towed vehicle's temporary lamps not coordinated with those of breakdown vehicle

I

2539 Reg. 169(3) Motor cycle/trailer not fitted with stop lamp at the rear I 10

Vehicle not fitted with at least one number plate lamp 2540 Reg. 170(1) illuminating plate so as to clearly see it from 20 metres. I 10

Non-RWC

Vehicle not fitted wtth at least one number plate lamp Reg 170(1) illuminating plate so as to clearly see it from 20 metres

l R w c 1 I 1 1 5 1 2542 Reg. 170(2) Number plate lamp beam directed to rear. Non-RWC I 10

2543 1 Reg. 170(2) INumber plate lamp beam directed to rear. RWC 1 1 1 1 5



Reg, 71 Breakdown vehicle not fitted with side-marker lamps emitting diffused yellow light.

I 10

Reg 171(2)(a) ( Vehiclelcombination of vehicles with incorrectly placed side-marker lamps (not 40Ornm from each end)

IVehiclelcombination of vehicles with incorrectly placed Reg (71 (2)(b) side- marker lamps (distance between lamps more than) I 1 10

3.6m)

side- marker lamps (Lower than 30Omm from ground)

Vehiclelcombination of vehicles with incorrectly placed

right angles to centre-line)

Reversing lamp illuminated to rearlunder vehicle. Driver Reg. 175(2) not in control of such lamp. Lamp did not operate when

vehicle was in reverse gear only Non-RWC 1 lo --

Reversing lamp illuminated Reg. 175(2) not in control of such lamp.

vehicle was in reverse gear I I I

Reg. 175(3) Too many reverse lamps fitted to vehicle. Non-RWC I 10

Reg. 175(3) [TOO many reverse lamps fitted to vehicle. RWC I 1 1 1 5 Reversing lamp operating when vehicle was not reversing

I R 4 175(3) (or about to do so. Non-RWC

10

Reg. 75(3) Reversing lamp operating when vehicle was not reversing or about to do so. RWC

I 15

Buslgwds vehicle with GVM exceeding 3500kg with two

Reg, 176(1, or more identification lamps fitted above windscreen lamps exceeded 21 watts, not visible from front and did not emit a green light.

Reg, 176(3) Vehicle fitted with lampllamps emittlng a blue light or capable of emitting a blue light. Non-RWC

I 10

Reg, 76(3) Vehicle fitted with lampllamps emitting a blue light or capable of emitt~ng a blue light. RWC

I 15

I I I

Reg, 176(4) Breakdown vehicle not fined with lampllamps capableof emitting an intermittently - flashing amber light.

Vehicle fitted with lamps (amber) either using these Reg. 176(4) lamps unnecessarily or not using them when it was

com~ulsorv to do so

Reg 176(5) 1 Medical doctor using intermittently-flashing red light when not in bona-fide exercise of his profession

Vehicle fitted with an unauthorized spot light capable of emittina a beam of liaht in anv direction. Non-RWC

Reg, 176(7) Security officer (registered or not) using a vehicle fitted with a light capable of emitting a rotating strobe light.

1 412 1 2 5 6 1 1 Reg177 1 Vehicle fitted with an unauthorized spot light capable of emittino a beam of lioht in anv direction RWC I I l l 5 1

I - -- - - , - I

413 2564 Reg 177(b) I 10 Med~cal doctorlveter~nananus~ng a spot hght when not In performance of hdher dut~es Breakdown veh~cle ustna a suot haht caDable of deflectlnd

414 2565 Reg. 177(c) a beam of light in any direction when nbt at the scene o 10 an accldent


Vehlcle used for electricity/essentiaI services fitted with i

41 2566 Reg, 177(c) spot lamp capable of deflecting a beam ~n any directio~ when not involved in essential services or with overheat lines.

416 2567 Reg, 179(1) Animal- drawn vehicle not led by a person or persol carrying a lamp emitting a white light Animal-drawn vehicle not fitted with lamps on both side!

417 2568 Reg. 179(1) at the front and the rear emitting white lights in front ant

I Ired lights at the back

]vehicle not provided for ~n Reg. 157-184 not fitted witt 1 418 1 2569 1 Reg. 180(1) llamps emitting white lights in front and red lights to the

Vehicle (not provided for in Reg. 157 - 184) using a lamp Reg. 180(2) not capable of emitting a beam of light to illuminate the 4 1 9 I 2 5 7 0 / 1

road ahead or using a lamp to dazzle other road users.

420 2571 Reg, 181(l)(a) Vehicle using a lamp that did not emit a white, yellow 01 amber light to the front. Non-RWC

421 2572 Reg, 181(l)(a) Vehicle using a lamp that did not emit a white, yellow 01 amber light to the front. RWC

422 2573 Reg, 181(l)(b) Vehicle using a lamp that did not emit a white or yellow hght to the sides of the vehicle. Non-RWC

L

423 2574 Reg, 181(l)(b) Veh~cle using a lamp that did not emit a white or yellow light to the sides of the vehicle. RWC

424 2575 Reg, 181(l)(c) Vehicle using a lamp that did not emit a red light to the rear Non-RWC . . - . . . . - . . . . -

425 2576 Reg, 181(l)(c) Vehicle using a lamp that did not emit a red light to the rear RWC 1 426 1 2577 I Reg 181r2) Vehicle "ed with two or more lamps which did not emit light of the same colour in the same direction. Non-RWC

427 2578 Reg, (2) Vehicle fitted with two or more lamps which did not emit light of the same colour in the same direction. RWC

Vehicle fitted with lamp that did not emit dlffused light. 428 2579 Reg.182

Non-RWC

429 Vehicle fitted with lamp that dld not ernlt diffused light.

2580 Reg. 182 nwC I

430 2581 Reg, 183 Vehicle fitted wlth lamps that did not emit a steady light. Non-RWC

431 2582 Reg, 183 Vehicle fitted with lamps that did not emit a steady light. W \ A l P 8 , " " "

Head lamps fitted lower than 450mm or hlgher than 1.4m 432 2583 Reg. 184(1'

above ground level. Non-RWC

433 2584 Reg, 84(1) Head lamps fitted lower than 450mm or higher than 1.4m above ground level. RWC Head lamps 1 fog lamps not fitted with suitable material or

434 2585 Reg. 184(2) designed to prevent a dangerous glare to on-coming traffic. Non-RWC Head lamps / fog lamps not fitted with suitable material or

435 2586 Reg 184(2) designed to prevent a dangerous glare to on-coming

Same type of lamps not placed symmetrically in relation




Reg 184(3)(b) ;ame type of lamps not placed at the same height or ~ther slde of vehlcle RWC amps not securely fitted to vehcle Non-RWC Reg. 184(4)

Reg. 184(4) amps not securely fitted to vehicle. RWC ens and reflector of a lamp not clean and maintainec

Reg. 184(5)

Reg. 184(5)

ffectively. Non-RWC ens and reflector of a lamp not clean and maintainec ffectively. RWC amp obscured by fitting1 object. Non-RWC Reg. 184(6)

Reg. 184(6) amp obscured by fitting1 object. RWC 'ehicle fitted with un~rescribedl unauthorized lamp. Non.

Reg. 185 IWC 'ehicle fitted with unprescribedl unauthorized lamp WC Reg. 185

Reg. 186(l)(a) railer not fitted with one white retro-reflectoron the from f vehicle

Reg. 186(l)(a) railer not fitted with two white retro-reflectors at the m e height one on either side on the front of the vehicle

leg. 186(l)(b) or (C)

eg. 186(l)(b) or (4

nimal-drawn vehicle1Rickshaw fitted with no white retro. lflector on the front of the vehicle nimal-drawn vehiclelRickshaw fitted with one white ?tro-reflector on the front of the vehicle

eh~cle fitted with a front retro-reflector incorrectly Jsitioned and laced further than 400rnm from outel Reg. 186(2)(a)

Reg. 186(2)(a)

Reg 186(2)(a)

Age of the widest part of vehicle. Non-RWC

ehicle fitted with front retro-reflectors incorrectlv ~sitioned and placed further than 400mm from outer jge of the widest part of vehicle. Non-RWC

ehicle fitted with a front retro-reflector incorrectly xitioned and placed further than 400mm from outer iae of the widest Dart of vehicle. RWC

ehicle fitted with front retro-reflectors incorrectlv lsitioned and placed further than 400mm from outer ige of the widest part of vehicle. RWC

ehicle fitted with one front retro-reflector incorrectly xitioned and placed nearer than 150mm from the idest part of vehicle. Non-RWC

ieg. 186(2)(b) ~hicle fitted with both front retrc-reflectors incorrectly )sitioned and placed nearer than l5Omm from the ~dest part of vehicle. Non-RWC

ehicle fitted with one front retro-reflector incorrectly )sitioned and placed nearer than 150mm from the idest part of vehicle. RWC

?hide fitted with front retrc-reflectors incorrectly ieg. 186(2)(b)

Reg. 186(3)

Reg. 187(1)

)sitioned and placed nearer than 150mm from the dest part of vehicle. RWC

adal cyde not fitted with white retro-reflector in front

'awinglrear most vehicle of combination of vehcles only, ted with one red retro-reflector. awinglrear most vehicle of combination of vehicles noti led with red retro-reflectors ?hide fitted with only one retro-reflector at the rear. No NC

I

Reg. 187(1) ,

?hide not fitted with any retro-reflectors at the rear at e same height and equidistant from centre-line. Now


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 1 I


Reg. 187(l)(a)

--

chicle fitted with one retro-reflector at the rear RWC

'ehicle not fitted with any retro-reflectorsat the rear al ie same height and equidistant from centre-line. RWC

Reg. 187(l)(a)

teg. 187(l)(b) or (C)

leg. 187(l)(b) or (C)

nimal-drawn vehicle I Rickshaw fitted with only one rec ?trc-reflectors at the rear or fitted more than 400mm om outer edge of vehicle

nimal-drawn vehicle / Rickshaw fitted with no retro. ?flector at the rear ehicle incorrectly fitted with a red ret:o-reflector more Ian 400mm from outer edge of widest part of vehicle. on-RWC ehicle incorrectly fitted with red retro-reflectors more Ian 400mm from outer edge of widest part of vehicle. on-RWC

Reg. 187(2)

Reg. 187(2)

Reg. 187(2) ehicle tncorrectly fitted with a red retro-reflector more Ian 400mm from outer edge of widest part of vehicle. wc

Reg. 187(2) ehicle incorrectly fitted with red retro-reflectors more an 400mm from outer edge of widest part of vehicle. wc otor cycle I Tricycle not fitted with red retrc-reflectorat e rear

Reg. 187(3)

Reg. 187(4) ~ d a l cycle not fitted with red retrc-reflector at the rear

ombination of vehicles exceeding 7m not fitted with a ?llow reflector within 3m from front of each vehicle and n from rear of each vehicle. Non-RWC

~mbination of vehicles exceeding 7m not fitted with !Ilow reflectors wlthin 3m from front of each vehicleand n from rear of each vehicle. RWC

teg. 188(a)(i) & (ii)

i e g 188(a)(i11) ~mbination of vehicles exceeding7m fitted only on one l e of the trailer with a yellow retrc- reflector within 3m, xn the front of trailer

ieg. 1 88(a)(iii)

Reg. 188(b)

Jmblnation of vehicles exceeding 7m not fitted with^ !Ilow reflectors on trailer within 3m from front of trailer !

I ?hiclelcombination of vehicles fitted with a yellow retro- flector on one or both sides of the combination more

?trc-reflector incorrectly fitted (lower than 300mm - gher than 1 Sm) to vehicle. Non-RWC

Reg. lBe(b) 1 Reg. 189(l)(a) 4

189(1)(a) 1:~h.r than I Sml to veh~cle Non-RWC I ?trc-reflectors incorrectly fitted (lower than 300mm - 1

ieg. 189(l)(a) Retrc-refledor incorrectly fitted (lower than 300mm - higher than 1 Sm) to vehicle. RWC

I

3eg, 189(l)(a) Retrc-reflectors incorrectly fitted (lower than 300mm - hlgher than 15m) to vehicle. RWC

I

Retro-reflector not fitted as near as posslble to correct I he~ght due to the des~gn of vehtcle Non-RWC 1

?eg. 189(l)(a) Retrc-reflectors not fitted as near as possible to correct height due to the design of vehicle Non-RWC

I

ieg, 189(l)(a) Retrc-reflector not fitted as near as possible to correct height due to the design of vehicle. RWC

I


1 SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008


1

L

I E, E g! -

letro-reflectors not fitted as near as possible to wrrec eight due to the design of vehicle. RWC

Vhite retro-reflector not vertically positioned or facin! quarely to the front. Non-RWC Vhite retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facin! quarely to the front. Non-RWC mite retro-reflector not vertically positioned or facin! quarely to the front RWC vhite retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facing

( 490 1 2641 1 Reg. 189(l)(b)(i)

488 2639 Reg. 189(l)(a)

469 2640 Reg. 189(l)(b)(i)

2

D u 0 D

F x U

491 2642 Reg. 189(l)(b)(i)

492 2643 Reg. 189(l)(b)(i)

493 2644 Reg. 189(l)(b)(ii)

494 2645 Reg. 189(l)(b)(ii)

495 2646 Reg. 189(l)(b)(ii)

3 - a 0

2 Z m B I c 8 5 u s! .2 2 s! 9 $ 2 s P, 3 r2 ro x V)

quarely to the front. RWC ed retro-reflector not vertically pos~t~oned or facin! . . quarely to the rear. Non-RWC ed retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facin! quarely to the rear. Non-RWC ed retro-reflector not vertically positioned or facing quarely to the rear. RWC ed retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facing quarely to the rear. RWC ellow retro-reflector not vertically positioned or facing quarely to the side. Non-RWC ellow retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facins 1 Wu 189(1)(b)(ii)

2648 Reg. :89(l)(b)(iii)

498 2649 Reg. 189(l)(b)(iii) quarely to the side. Non-RWC ellow retro-reflector not vertically positioned or facinc

2651 Reg. 189(l)(b)(iii)

2652 Reg. 189(l)(c)

quarely to the side. RWC ellow retro-reflectors not vertically positioned or facinc . .

parely to the side. RWC etro-reflector not in a good or clean condition. Non. wc etro-reflectors not in a good or clean condition. Non. ilvc

8tro-reflector not in a good or clean condition. RWC

stro-reflectors not in a good or clean condition. RWC

stro-reflector fitted to movable part of vehicle. Nan-RWI

stro-reflectors fitted to movable part of vehicle. Non- ilyc

507 1 2658 1 Reg. 189(l)(d) I I

7

Rf R1

?tro-reflector fitted to movable art of vehicle. RWC - - - - -- --

?tro-reflectors fitted to movable part of vehicle. RWC

?tro-reflector not fitted according to Reg. 187(2) and ag. 189(l)(a).Failed to fit a red retro-reflector to rear, :ed it too low or too high, failed to fit two additional red tro-reflectors. fitted them the correct distance. Non-

- Rf - Rf

Rf Rf fin re RWC

508

509

2659

2660

510

Reg. 189(l)(d)

Reg. 190

51 1

2661

2662

Reg. 190

Retro-reflectors not fitted according to Reg. 187(2) and Reg. 189(l)(a).Failed to fit red retro-reflectors to rear. fitted them too low or too high, failed to fit two additional red retro-reflectors, fitted them the correct distance. Non- RWC

Reg,

Retro-reflector not fitted according to Reg. 187(2) and Reg. 189(l )(a).Failed to fit a red retro-reflector to rear. fitted it too low or too high, failed to fit two additional red retro-reflectors, fMed them the correct distance. RWC


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 1

letrc-reflectors not fitted leg. 189(l)(a).Failed to tted them too low or too ~d retro-reflectors, fitted them the correct distance. RW

Reg. 190

Reg. 191(2)

Reg. 191(2)

ailed to fit warning sign to rear of vehicle. Non-RWC I

ailed to fit warning sign to rear of vehicle. RWC I

Reg 191(2)(a) 8 (b)

Reg. 191(2)(a) & ( 4

Reg 191 (2)(c)

Reg 191 (2)(c)

Varning sign (chevron) did not comply w~th requirements r bear certification mark. Non-RWC

Uarning sign (chevron) did not comply with requirements r bear certification mark RWC

Uarning sign (fitted afler01/01/2001) d ~ d not include red nd yellow retro-reflective strips. Non-RWC

Uarning 1 nd yellow sign retro-reflective (fitted after 01/01/2001) strips. RWC did not include red

Reg. 191(3)(a) Uarning sign not cut to fit vehicle -where design1 , nsuitable to fit chevron Non-RWC

I

Varning sign not cut to fit veh~cle -where design nsuitable to fit chevron. RWC

I

ehicle wlth chevron not cut to fit vehicle because of

Reg 191 (3)(a) -

Reg 191 (3)(b) nsuitable deslgn. Also did not contain 7 retro-reflectors on-RWC

Reg. 191(3)(b) ehicle w~th chevron not cut to fit vehicle because of nsultable design. Also did not contain 7 retro-reflectors I wc I

Reg 191 (4)(a) hevron sign not in an upright position or within 15 egrees of position or facing squarely to the rear. Non- I wc

Reg. 191(4)(a) hevron sign not in an upright position or within 15 sgrees of position or facing squarely to the rear. RWC

hevron placed higher than 1.5rn above ground level. on-RWC hevron placed higher than 1.5m above ground level.

Reg. 191 (4)(b)

Reg. 191 (4)(b)

Reg. 191(4)(c) hevron not extending far enough to sides to indicate idth of vehlcle (within 400rnrn) Non-RWC I

Reg. 191 (4)(c) hevron not extending far enough to sides to indicate idth of vehicle (within 400mm) RWC

I

hevron sign not clean and in good condition and , Reg. 191(4)(d)

Reg. 191 (4)(d)

erefore ineffective. Non-RWC I

hevron sign not clean and in good cond~tion and1 , erefore ~neffective. RWC 1 '

Reg. 192(1) eflective material on vehicle did not reflect whte to the mt. red to the rear and vellow to the sides.

Reg. 192(3) sdal cycle not discernible from l5Om between sunset ~d sunrise because pedals/spokes/armswere not fitted I th reflective materials.

Reg. 1924(1) 'escribed vehicle wlth side and rear contour or strip arkings that are not according to the standard SANS

oods vehicle with GVM more than 3500kg not fitted th contour or strip rnark~ngs at the sides I rear or such arkings affixed higher than 600mm from lower part of

Reg. 1924(2)(a)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I 1

Short charge wording - reference to National Road I $ - ~ r a k c Act, 1996

.-

bods vehicle with a length of more than 7m not fitted lith stde / rear contour or strip marking as specified from I Reg. 192A(2)(b)

Reg. 192A(2)(d)

-7-2004 railer or caravan not fitted with s~de I rear contour or1 trip marking or such markings as specified from 1-7- 004

Reg. 192A(2)(e) us not fitted with side or rear contour or strip markings r such markings affixed higher than 600mm from lower

LTTA midibus or a bus not fitted with side B rear mtour or strip markings or such markings affixed higher tan 600mm from lower part of body (4-9-2006)

Reg. 192A(2)(f)

perating licence minibus first registered after 4-9-2006 ~t fitted with side and rear contour or strip markings or , ~ c h markings affixed higher than 600mm from lower art of body

LTTA minibus not fitted with side and rear contour ~arkings after 1 January 2007 or such markings affixed I gher than 600mm from lower part of body

otor home not fitted with side or rear contour or strip arkings first registered after 1 July 2007 or such I arkings affixed higher than 600mm from lower part of

Reg. 192A(2)(h)

Reg. 192A(2)(i)

3dy

ehicle fitted with only one direction indicator. Non-RWC I Reg. 193(1)

Reg. 193(1) ehicle not fitted with direction indicators on both sides.1

Reg. 193(1) ehicle fitted with only one direction indicator. RWC I

ahicle not fitted with direction indicators on both sides.1 , Reg. 193(1)

ne flasher type indicator did not incorporatelamp. Non-

3th flasher type indicators did not incorporate lamps. m R W C

Reg. 194(a)

Reg. 194(a)

Reg 194(a)

Reg. 194(a) 1

ne flasher type indicator did not incorporate lamp. RWC I

~ t h flasher type indicators did not incorporate lamps. I

A i r

Reg. 194(b)

Reg. 194(b)

Reg. 194(b)

Reg. 194(b)

Reg. 194(c)

ne flashertype indicator did not show an intermittently - ~shing lighffnot clearly visible from 30m. Non-RWC

I

~ t h flashertype indicatorsdid not show an intermittently I

~shing lighffnot clearly visible from 30m. Non-RW

i e flashertype indicator did not show an intermittently - ~sh~ng lighffnot clearly visible from 30m. RWC

I

lth Rashertype indicators did not show an intermittently

elnot as near as possible to or more than 500mm from

to or more than 500mm from

STAATSKOERANT. 16 JULIE 2008 No. 31242 125


Short charge wording - reference to National Road Traftic Act, 1996

h e flasher type indicator not equidistant from centre nelnot as near as possible to or more than 500mm fron ont or rear. RWC

0th flasher type indicators not equidistant from centre ielnot as near as possible to or more than 500mm fron ont or rear. RWC

Reg 194(c)

Reg 194(c)

Reg. 194(d) Ine flasher type indicator not positioned properly so as tc e seen from the front and the rear of the vehicle. Non WC

0th flasher type indicators not positioned properly so a5 r be seen from the front and the rear of the vehicle. Non. wr

Reg. 194(d)

Reg. 194(d) Ine flasher type indicator not positioned properly so as tc e seen from the front and the rear of the vehicle RWC

Reg. 194(d) 0th flasher type mdicators not positioned properly so as I be seen from the front and the rear of the vehicle wc

Reg. 194(dA) ne flasher type indicator fitted so that the lamp was gher than the roof. Non-RWC 0th flasher type Indicators fitted so that the lamps were

Reg. l94(dA)

Reg. l94(dA)

gher than the roof Non-RWC ne flasher type tnd~cator fitted so that the lamp was gher than the roof RWC

0th flasher type indicators fined so that the lamps were gher than the roof. RWC

ailed to mount one flasher type direction indicator in the mt and one at the rear visible from the front and the :ar. Non-RWC

ailed to mount flasher type direction indicators in the mt and at the rear visible from the front and the rear. on-RWC

piled to mount one flasher type direction indicator in the mt and one at the rear visible from the front and the ar. RWC

piled to mount flasher type direction indicators in the mt and at the rear visible from the front and the rear. UC

Reg. 194(dA)

Reg. 194(e)

Reg 194(e)

Reg. 194(e)

Reg 194(e)

Reg. 194(f) ne flasher type d~rect~on mdlcator comb~ned w~thA&n iOmm of lamp emltted lhght weaker than that of lamp m-RWC

Reg. 194(f) I h flasher type direction indicators combined thlwithin 150mm of lamp emitted light weakerthan that lamp. Non-RWC

ne flasher type direction indicator combined withlwithin iOmm of lamp emitted light weaker than that of lamp. INC

I Reg 194(f)

Reg. 194(f) -...-A ~ t h flasher type direction indicators combined thlwlthin 150mm of lamp emitted light weakerthan that lamp. RWC

i e flasher tvpe direction indicator did not emit white. Reg. 194(g) -4 llow or amber hght to front and yellow or amber or red

ht to the rear Non-RWC

)th flasher type dlrectlon mdlcators d ~ d not emit whlte. llow or amber hght to front and yellow or amber or red ht to the rear Non-RWC

Reg. 194(g)

Reg. 194(g) i e flasher type dlrectlon lndlcator d ~ d not emlt wh~te. llow or amber hght to front and yellow or amber or red ht to the rear RWC


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulation


0th flasher type direction indicators did not emit white allow or amber light to front and yellow or amber or rec jht to the rear. RWC Ine illuminated window type direction indicator emittinc !d, yellow or amber light to the rear not visible from 301~ I daylight. Non-RWC

0th illuminated window type direction indicators emitting !d, yellow or amber light to the rearnot visible from 30m daylight. Non-RWC

Reg. 194(g)

Reg. 195(a)

Reg. 195(a)

Reg. 195(a)

Reg. 195(a)

Reg. 195(aA)

Reg. l95(aA)

ne illuminated window type direction indicator emitting d, yellow or amber light to the rearnot visiblefrom 30m daylight. RWC

0th illuminated window type direction indicators emitting :d, yellow or amber light to the rear not visible from 30m daylight. RWC ne illuminated window type direction indicator fitted gher than the roof. on-RWC 9th illuminated window type direction indicators fitted gher than the roof. on-6.k ne illuminated window tvoe d~rection indicator fitted

Reg. l95(aA) gher than the roof. RWC 3th illuminated window type direction indicators fitted gher than the roof. RWC ne illuminated window type direction indicator not at

Reg. l95(aA)

Reg 195(b) ast,l50mm long, 25mm wide and arrow shaped. Non- INC 9th illuminated window type direction indicators not at ast, 150mm long. 25mm wide and arrow shaped. Non- Reg. 195(b)

Reg. 195(b)

Reg. 195(b)

ne illuminated window type direction indicator not at ast.150mm long. 25mm wide and arrow shaped. RWC

)th illuminated window type direction indicators not at ast. 150mm long, 25mm wide and arrow shaped. RWC

ne illuminated window type direction indicator not fitted R e g 195(C)

Reg. 195(c)

Reg. 195(c)

rear of vehicle. Non-RWC )th illuminated window type direction indicators not :ed to rear of vehicle. on-RWC i e illuminated window type direction indicator not fitted rear of vehicle. RWC Ah ilhminated window type direction indicators not :ed to rear of vehicle. RWC

i e illuminated window type direction indicator not fitted vehicle exceeding 7.6m at the front and the rear or did ~t comply with provisions of regulations. Non-RWC '

)th illuminated window type direction indicators not, ed to vehicle exceeding 7.6m at the front and the rear1 did not comply with provisions of regulations. Non-

NC

Reg 195(c)

Reg. 197(1)

Reg. 197(1)

l e illuminated window type direction indicator not fitted vehicle exceeding 7.6m at the front and the rear or did t comply with provisions of regulations. RWC

Reg. 197(1)

)th illuminated window type direction tndicators ed to vehicle exceeding 7.6m at the front and the rea did not comply with provisions of regulations. RWC

Reg. 197(1)



SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations,

Reg. 197(2)(a)

Reg. 197(2)(a)

Reg. 197(2)(b)

I

)ne illuminated window type direction indicator not fittec I vehicle exceeding7.6m on the rear half and not withir OOmm of the rear of vehicle. RWC

10th illuminated window type direct~on indicators no tted to vehicle exceeding 7.6m on the rear half and no rithin 600mm of the rear of vehicle RWC

me illuminated window type direction indicator fitted tc ~mbination of vehicles exceeding 7.6m not less thar OOmm of rear end of last vehicle. RWC

I

Reg. 197(2)(b) 0th illuminated window type direction indicators fitted tc ombination of vehicles exceeding 7.6m not less thar OOmm of rear end of last vehicle. RWC

Ine direction indicator was not at the correct height or Reg. 198(1)

Reg. 198(1)

le vehicle. Non-RWC wo direction indicators were not at the correct height or le vehicle. Non-RWC n e direction ind~cator was not at the correct height on le vehicle. RWC

Reg. 198(1)

Reg. 198(1) wo d~rection indicators were not at the correct height or le vehicle RWC

Reg. 198(1) n e direction indicator obscured when in use. Non-RWC

Reg. 198(1)

Reg 198(1)

Reg. 198(1)

0th direction mdicators obscured when in use. Non- wc ne direction indicator obscured when in use. RWC

0th direction indicators obscured when in use. RWC

~dicator lamps (front or rear) not positioned on the same vel. Non-RWC dicator lamps (front or rear) not positioned on the same vel. RWC irection indicators not visible to driver . No device ovided giving driver visible or audible warning. Non- wc

Reg. 198(2)

Reg. 198(2)

Reg. 198(3)

Reg 198(3) irection mdlcators not visible to dr~ver . No device ovided giving driver visible or audible warning. RWC

Reg. 198(4)

Reg. 198(4)

irection indicators failed to operate independently of ~ c h other. Non-RWC

rection indicators failed to operate independently of ~ c h other. RWC shicle not fitted with a switch to operateall indicators at

Reg. 198(5)(a) e same time. Non-RWC ahicle not fitted with a switch to operate all mdicators at

Reg. 198(5)(a) e same time. RWC

'iver operated all switches at the same time when the !hide was not moving and in a hazardousposition or in I emergency operation in motion. Non-RWC

Reg. 198(6) ~ I

Reg. l98(6) ~ .iver operated all switches at the same time when the !hide was not moving and in a hazardouspos~t~on or in I emergency operation in motion. RWC

Reg. 198(7) rection ind~cators fitted to funct~on at the same time not terwnnected to function together. Non-RWC

rection indicators fitted to function at the same time not1 terwnnected to function together. RWC

ne direction indicator not in good working order. Non- Reg. 198(8) 1


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008


0th direction indicators not In good working order. Non. !WC

624 2775 Reg. 198(8)

625 2776 Reg. 198(8)

626 2777 Reg. 198(9)

627 2778 Reg. 198(9)

628 2779 Reg. 198(9)

lne direction indicator not in good working order. RWC

0th direction indicators not in good working order. RWC

amp of direction indicator did not emit diffused light. on-RWC 0th l a m s of direction indicators did not emit diffusec jht. Non-RWC amp of direction indicator did not emit diffused light. wc 0th lamps of direction indicators did not emit diffused ;ht. RWC owed vehicle not fitted with temporary indicators while sing towed. Also not coordinated with breakdowr ?hide river used direction indicators that did not comply with 'ovisions. Non-RWC river used d~rection indicators that did not comply with .ovisions. RWC

( 629 1 2780 1 Reg. 198(9)

1 630 1 2781 / Reg. 198(10)

1 631 1 2782 1 Reg. 199

1 632 1 2783 ( Reg. 199

1 633 1 2784 1 Reg. 200(l)(a) teering gear not in good condition and unsafe for use

I parts of steering mechanism not correctly adjusted. -

634 2785 Reg. 200(l)(b)

635 2786 Reg. 200(l)(c)

636 2787 Reg. 200(2)(a)

637 2788 Reg 200(2)(c)

638 2789 Reg. 200(3)(a)

639 2790 Reg. 200(3)(b)

640 2791 Reg 200(3)(b)

ft-hand steering wheel

otor cycle handlebars too high, too low or too wide apaf

andlebars of motor cycle not symmetrically positioned.

andlebarsof motor cvcle (less than 200cc) too close to rch other (not 500mm apart) andlebarsof motor cvcle (200cc ~ l u s ) too close to each , ~ , ,

her (not 600mm apart) I

?If-propelled vehicle not equipped with warning devfce at can be heard from a distance of 90 metres

?dal cycle not equipped with adequate warning device I ?hide fitted with a siren chicle fitted with a device that emitted a varying tone or tch

?hide fitted with windscreen etc. through which the iver did not have sufficient v~sibility

?hide reaistered after 1958 fitted with transvarenh aterial (other than glass) did not comply with pro&ions( I / 1 646 1 2797 1 Reg. 202(l)(b) I

even when shattered

647 2798 Reg. 202(l)(c) Vehicle registered after 1958 not fitted with safety glass. Panes not marked with trade marks etc.

I

648 2799 Reg, 202(3)(a) I 10 1 500 250 Vehicle not fitted with windscreen and panes that transmit sufficient light

1

649 2800 Reg. 202(3)(b) I 10 1 500 250 Wfndscreenlpanes with film or tinting not free from bubbles, tears or scratches

650 2801 Reg. 202(3)(c) I 10 1 500 250 Rear windscreen or pane displaying picture or graph etc. covering more than 1116 of the surface area



chicle not fitted with at least one windscreen wiper fhich could function independently and cont~nuously in I Reg. 203

Reg. 203

ont of driver. Non-RWC I ehicle not fitted with at least one windscreen wioerl ,hich could function independently and continuousl; in1 I ont of driver. RWC

onstructlon of vehicle hindered driver of being able to se ahead and to hislher left or right

I Reg 204(l)(a)

Reg. 204(l)(b) ehicle not fitted with rear viewlother mirrors whichl , !fled traffic to the rear. Non-RWC I

ehicle not fitted with rear viewlother mirrors which1 , Reg 204(l)(b) !fled traffic to the rear. RWC I

ehicle registeredon or after0110111987 and with a GVM ss than 3500kg which was fitted with an interior rear- ew mirror but through wh~ch the driver could not see r f k to the rear. Vehicle also not fitted with exterio irror on opposite side

ss than 3500 ka. not fitted wlth rear-view I exterio

Reg. 204(l)(c)

Reg. 204(l)(c) irror (driver's side)

?hide reg~stered on or after 0110111987 with a G V M ~ Reg 204(1)(d) ore than 3500kg not fitted with rear-view mirrors on I

)th sides of vehicle.

otorcycle etc, not fitted with rear-view mirror on right Je and, afler 1990, on both sides

I

?hide registered onlafter 0110111976 or registered !tween 0110111976 - 31/12/1986 with a GVM higher an 3500kg not fitted with rear-view mirrors that were I )t flat spherically convexor did not have a curvature less an 1.2m

?hide registered onlafter 01/01/1987 with a GVM ceeding 3500kg not fitted with all mirrors that were not t or spherically convex and not having an average

I

Reg. 204(l)(e)

ieg. i 204(2)(b)

lrad~us curvature not less than 1 8m I I

Reg 205(a) Fuel tank, receptacle etc. defective or a source of danger I

Reg. 205(b) Fuel tank cap not effective I

Reg, 205(c) BatterylElectrical wiring not correctly installed Cause of rlanflpr I

Reg. 206 IEngine not covered properly.. Could be source of danger1 I I I I

Reg, 207(1) Helmet not specially designed for such use or which did not fit him or her I

Reg, 207(1) Motor cycle, tricycle etc, passenger failed to wear a specially deslgned helmet

I

Reg, 207(1) Driver of motorcycle, tricycle etc. failed to wear a I specially designed helmet or one that did not fit properly

Reg, 207(2) Pedal cycle driverlpassengerfailed to wear a protective helmet or one that did not fit properly

I 2

Driver of motor cycle, tricycle etc. failed to ensure that a Reg. 207(3) passenger younger than 14yrs complied with provision of I 5

reaulation

Reg, 207(3) Driver pedal cycle faded to ensure that a passenge younger than 14yrs complied with provision of regulation

1 I I

Side car of motor cycle not on left side and not according R e g Ito specifications

I 5


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 i


lotor cyde with an engine capacity less than 50cc wit1 decar attached. Reg. 208

Reg. 209(a)

Reg. 209(b)

Reg. 209(c)

ilencerlmuffling device not effective. Gas not projectem lrough silencer. Sound not reduced effectively

as from englne not pmjected through silencer as from exhaust so dense so as to cause visibiliq ~ b l e m s

xhaust pipelsilencer n i t in working order or incorrect1 xitioned. Gas leaking into driver's cab

ilencer exceeded noise level ehicle with fixed hood exceeding 570kg did not haw leans of entrancelexiton both sides or a ready means o ;cape

ehicle with fixed hood exceeding 570kg. conveyin! sssengersdid not comply with provisions of Reg. 210 d not have an exit at the rear or afford passenger xess to the driver's compartment

Reg. 209(d)

Reg. 209(e)

Reg. 210(l)(a)

Reg. 210(l)(b)

Reg. 210(2)

-

ahtcle w~th fixed hood exceeding 570kg dld not have : ~orlbarrier protecting entrance, exlt or escape mode

shicle wlth fixed hood exceeding 570kg did not have z lor that could open or close from inside and outside o )uld close properly or was not clear of obstruction

?hide exceeding 570kg could not be driven backward! id forwards prated a vehicle on a public road equipped with meta res actorltrailer was equipped with metal tyre (less thar IOmm) iimal-drawn vehicle equipped with metal tyre (less thar Imm)

Reg. 210(3)

Reg. 21 1

Reg. 210(a)

Reg. 212(b)

Reg. 212(c)

Reg. 212(d)

Reg. 212(e)

?hide equipped with metal tyres, the whole width 0'

?ad not in contact with surface of the road

?hide equipped with wornldecayed tyres that coula Image the road or be a danger to other road-users

Reg 212(f)

Reg. 212(9)

Reg. 212(h)

Reg. 212(i)

?hide equipped with such warn tyres that the bndcord was exposed ?hide fitted with lvre incorrectlv constructedmtted atal could come into.contact with the road ,tor cycle equipped with retreated tyres !hlcIe equipped w~th regrooved tyres - Bead diemetel 0 mm or less. ?hide, fitted with pneumatic tyres, tread not at leas1 i m in depth all round. !hide fined with tread depth indicator whilst tread was !el with indicator

Itor cycle not exceeding 50cc fitted w~th a pneumatic e, the tread pattern not at least 80% of the full width

!hide equipped with a tyre that had a breaklcut that ceeded 25mm or 10% of width

Reg. 212(i)(i)

Reg. 212(i)(ii)

Reg. 212(k)

Reg. 212(1)

Reg. 212(m) !h&le equipped with a tyre wth a lump or a bulge in it

Reg 212(n) )crated a mini- midi- or bus without steel radial tyres


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I 4 I 5 I 6 1

; ; T e g . 213(11)

Reg 213(3)(a)

2852 Reg. 21 3(3)(b)

)river did not ensure that all persons were wearing seat elts

I 5

'ehicle not fitted with seat belts I 1 1 1 0 linibus exceeding 2500kg not fined w~th seat beits for river or oassenoer I 10

eat belts not working properly 1 1 1 5

berated a vehicle whilst seat belts were removed I 1 1 5

sed a vehicle o~eratina in terms of an o~eratina licence1 , I - p Reg 213(5)

lithout the required seat belts

sed a vehicle in terms of operating llcence without the1 , I , 3rrec.t rear seat belt configuration

I J

dult did not wear seat belt I 5 dult occupied seat not fitted with a seat belt whilst other , sats did have a seat belt

I J

ailed to ensure that a child used a child restramt or a1 , ] , sat belt

I J

ailed to ensure that a child used rear seat equipped with seatbelt

I 5

eatbelts did not comply with SANS specifications I 5

hild restra~nt did not comply with SANS specifications I 5

2863 1 Reg. 214(2)(a) eh~cle did not carry at least one emergency warnmg on

ehicle exceeding 3500 kg did not carry at least one nergency warning sign which complied with SANS I 5 ~ecifications

siled to display at least one emergency warning sign hen vehicle was stationary

I 5

nlawfully removed or tampered with emergency warning gn on roadway

I 5

~d not place warning sign 45m from vehicle or did not ace it with the reflective side facmg on-coming traffic

I 5

2864 I Reg. 214(2)(b)

2866 1 Reg. 214(4)

2867 / Reg. 214(5)

shicle not equipped with a speedometer I 1 1 1 0 3eedometer not in good working order 1 1 1 5 otorcar, minibus etc. did not comply with requirements Section 22 and SAN 047-1 955

I 10

?hide not fitted with necessary equipment / equ~pment )tin working order

I 10

ailer. GVM exceeding 3500kg or bus etc. exceeding iOOkg after 01/07/1999 did not have wheel flaps or did I 5 ~t comply with spec~fications

ailer. GVM exceeding 3500kg or goods veh~cle :weding 12 OOOkg did not have a rear underrun I 10

;2;; 1 Reg 216(1)

Reg 216(2)

2872 1 Reg. ZIi'(l)

2873 / Reg 218 1 1 500 otectiofi dev~ce or dld not comply with specifications

?mi-trailer registered onlafter 01/07/1999 not fitted with ~ l y one axle or axle-unit or of only one type of I 10 1 500 soension.

2874 1 Reg. 219 I u x?r VI Part Ill: Dimens - I

RTR Cha 1

ns of vehicles ailer and drawing veh~cle wuld not sw~vel in a ~rizontal plane at the coupling. Length more than 1,8 I 10 1 500 250 250 49(d) 724 1 2900 1 Reg. 221(a) I . .-

metres I I 725 2901 Reg. 221 (b)(i) Trailer with GVM exceeding 12 OOOkg exceeded 11.3m I 10 1

726 1 2902 1 Reg. 221(b)(ii) ]Trailer. GVM not exceeding 12 OOOkg exceeded 8m I I I l O I 1 727 1 2903 1 Reg. 221(c) ITrailer, GVM exceeding 12 000kg exceeded 12.5m I I 1 10 I 1




fticulated/combination of vehicles exceeded 18.5m

lustrain exceeded 22m lus exceeded 15m 'ehicle exceeded 12.5m :ombination of vehicles exceeded 22m :ombination of vehicles not consisting of drawing vehick 1 733 1 2909 1 Reg. 222(l)(a) nd one or two trailers )perated a combination of motor vehicles being a mot01 ehicle drawing more than one other motor vehicle which re not trailers I 734 I 2910 / Rep 222(l)(b)

735 2911 Reg. 222(2)(a)

736 2912 Reg. 222(2)(b)

737 2913 Reg. 222(5)

.ombination of vehicles could not bend in a horizonta lane and the lenglh of the trailer and the rear overhan! xceeded 3.1 m

ombination of vehicles had more than one axle, withoul n underslung coupling and drawbar exceeded 2m

reakdown vehicle did not display necessary ~nformatior ,hilst towing or drawing another vehicle

us - width between front wheels exceeded 1.9m . verall width exceeded 2.6m oods vehicle GVM exceeding 12 OOOkg - width ~ceeded 2.6m ehicle - overall width exceeded 2.5m ouble-deck bus - overall height (with load) exceedec 65m

742 2918 Reg. 224(b)

743 2919 Reg. 225(a)

ehicle - overall heiclht (with load) exceeded 4.3177

ehicle - turning radius exceeded 13.1 m.Bus/train or twin eer 4 axle rigid goods vehicle - turning radius exceedec 7.5m emi-trailer wheel base exceeded 10m us-train wheel base exceeded 15m ahicle wheel base exceeded 8.5m smi-trailer front overhang exceeded 1 .am

I 748 1 2924 1 Reg. 226(l)(b)(i) ehicle front overhang exceeded 60% of wheel base

I 749 / 2926 1 Reg. 226(l)(b)(ii) ehicle front overhang exceeded 1.2m less half of wheel Ise. Backrest of driver's seat was more than 1.7m from mt end of vehicle ~hicle front overhang exceeded5.8m less half the wheel me

JS, motor home, refuse, sewage vehicle etc. the rear rerhang of which exceeded 70% of wheelbase

1 751 1 2927 1 Reg. 226(2)(a)

ailer (one or two axles) the distance between the centre les less than 1.2m. Rearoverhangexceeded50% of the ngth of body of trailer

I 752 I 2928 I Reg 226(2)(b)

I I

753 2929 Reg. 226(2)(C) shicle - the rear overhang exceeded 60% of wheelbase

Reg. ~ 9 "

~~ i ( l ) (a ) ( i ) (aa ) 1 Reg. 755 2931

227(l)(a)(i)(bb) 1

~slGoods vehicle carrying fittingslgoods that projected ore than 1.3m on either side of centre-line

?hide carrying goodslfittings that projected more than'

1 756 1 2932 1 Reg. 227(l)(a)(ii)l

1 757 1 2933 1 Reg. 227(l)(a)(iii)l !yond the rear of the vehicle ?hide - the front overhang + any projection exceede I 758 1 2934 1 Reg. 227(l)(b)(i) / l i t provided for in Reg. 226(1)(b)


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations, 2008 1

L

e n

S $ - -

759

760

76 1

762

763

764

765

766

NRTR Ch

767

768

769

770


'ehicle - bracket projecting more than 150mm beyonc ridest part of vehicle

ehiclelcombination of vehicles exceeded overall length

lotor cycle (with or without sidecar) tricycle etc. the rojection of which exceeded(a)600mm to the front ))900mm to the rear, (c)450mm to the sides. (d)300mrr outside of the wheel of sidecar

teg. 227(l)(b)(ii)

Reg. 227(2)

Reg. 228

Reg. 228 edal cycle with goods projecting more than(a)600mm tc ont.(b)900mm to rear,(c)450mm to sides

Reg. 229(l)(a)

Reg 229(1)(b)

ehicle with load projecting more than 150mm to the des without the necessary lamps or reflectors altachec : night

ehicle with load ~miectina more than 150mm to the . . - des without the necessary red flags attached during the 3Y

Reg. 229(2)(a) ehicle w~th load prolect~ng more than 300mm to the real ithout the necessary reflectors or lamps attached at ght ehicle with load projecting more than 300mm to the real ithout the necessaryred flagslcloth attached during the 3v

Reg. 229(2)(b)

art IV: Loads on vehicles I I Operated a midibus, minibus or motor vehicle conveying

Reg 233(1)(b) more persons than for whom seating accommodation I was available to wit: 11 and more persons

Operated a midibus, minibus or motor vehcle conveying Reg. 233(1)(b) more persons than for whom seating accommodation I

was available to wit: 6-10 persons

Operated a midibus, minibus or motor vehicle conveying Reg. 233(1)(b) more persons than for whom seating accommodation I

was available to wit: 1-5 persons

A bus or midibus operating in terms of an operating

Reg, 233(2) licence with more persons on any seat than was allowed at a rate of 400 mm per person to wit: 16 and more

I

Dersons

A bus or midibus operating in terms of an operating Reg. 233(2) licence with more persons on any seat than was allowed I

at a rate of 400 mm per person to wit: 11 to 15 persons

A bus or midibus operating in terms of an operating Reg. 233(2) licence with more persons on any seat than was allowed I

at a rate of 400 mm per person to wit. 1 to 10 persons

A minibus operating in terms of an operating licence with Reg. 233(2) more persons on any seat than was allowed at a rate of I

400 mm per person to wit: I I and more persons

A minibus operating in terms of an operating licence with

A minibus operating in terms of an operating licence with

400 mm per person to wit: 1 to 5 persons




Reg. 234(1) urn of all the wheel massloads on that axle exceedsthe errnissible rnax. calculated in accordance with SANS pecifications by 2-3.99%

urn of all the wheel rnassloadson that axle exceedsthe errnissible max. calculated in accordance with SANS ~ecifications by 4-5.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1) um of all the wheel rnassloads on that axle exceedsthe errnissible rnax, calculated In accordance with SANS ~ecifications by 6-7.99%

urn of all the wheel rnassloadson that axle exceedsthe ?rrnissible rnax. calculated in accordance with SANS Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

~ecifications by 8-9.99%

urn of all the wheel rnassloads on that axle exceedsthe srrnissible rnax. calculated in accordance with SANS ~ecifications by 10-1 1.99%

urn of all the wheel rnassloads on that axle exceedsthe ?rrnissible rnax. calculated in accordance with SANS ~cf lcat ions by 12-1 3.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1) urn of all the wheel rnassloadson that axleexceedsthe ?rrnissible rnax. calculated in accordance with SANS )ecifications by >13.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

eterrnined sum of all the wheel rnassloads on an axle cceeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 2-3.99%)

eterrnined sum of all the wheel massloads on an axle tceeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 4-5.99%)

aterrnined sum of all the wheel rnassloads on an axle reeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 6-7.99%)

Reg. 234(1) sterrnined sum of all the wheel rnassloads on an axle :ceeds the permissible rnax, as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 8-9.99%)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

stermined sum of all the wheel rnassloads on an axle :ceeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 10-1 1.99%)

~termined sum of all the wheel massloads on an axle ceeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the

?termifled sum of all the wheel rnassloads on an axle ceeds the permissible rnax. as approved by the

?terrnined axle massload of axle with non-pneumatic

Reg 234(1) 1 tyres exceedsthe sum of all the wheel rnassloads on that axle determined as 8 kall mm width of everv tvre on , , such axle by 2-3.99%) I

l~etermlned axle rnassload of axle with non-pneumatic1


Determined axle massload of axle with non-pneumatic

Reg, 234(1) tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel massloads on thal

3026 1 1 axle determined as 8 kg11 mm width of every tyre or such axle bv 8-9.99%)

Determined axle massload of axle with non-pneumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel massloads on thal axle determined as 8 kg11 mm width of every tyre on such axle by 10-1 1.99%)


Reg, 234(1) tyres exceedsthe sum of all the wheel massloads on that axle determined as 8 kg11 mm width of every tyre on such axle by 12-13.99%)


Reg 234(1) tyres exceedsthe sum of all the wheel massloadson that axle determined as 8 kg11 mm width of every tyre on such axle by >13.99%)

Reg. 234(1) Axle massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the permiss~ble max. axle massload of 2700 kg. by 2-3.99%

3031 I Reg 234(1) IAxle massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the permiss~ble max axle massload of 2700 kg by 4-5 99%

3032 / R e g 234(1) M e massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the I permissible max, axle massload of 2700 kg by 6-7.99%

3033 I R e g 234(1) Axle massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the I permissible max. axle massload of 2700 kg. by 8-9.99%

Axle massload of axle w~th metal tyres exceeds the Reg. 234(1) permissible max. axle massload of 2700 kg. by 10-

11.99%

Axle massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the Reg. 234(1) permissible max. axle massload of 2700 kg. by 12-

13.99%

lo36 I Reg, 234(1) Axle massload of axle with metal tyres exceeds the permissible max. axle massload of 2700 kg. by > 13.99%

Axle massload of vehicle/wmbination, fitted with non- Reg. 234(1) pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeds50% of that permitted I

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 2-3.99%

I

Axle massload of veh~clelwmbination, fitted with non- Reg. 234(1) pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeds50% of that permitted I

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 4-5.99%

Axle massload of veh~cle/combination. fitted with non- Reg 234(1) pneumatic or metal tyres exceeds50% of that permitted

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 6-7 99%

t

Axle massload of vehicle/wmbination, fitted with non- Reg 234(1) pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permitted

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 8-9 99%

Axle massload of vehicle/wmbination. fitted with non- Reg. 234(1) pneumatic or metal tyres. exceeds50% of that permitted I 011 1 1

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 10-1 1.99%




7

g .- a . E 0

5

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

1

2

xle rnassload of vehicle/cnmbination, fitted with nov neumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permittel ,r vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 12-13.99%

xle massload of vehicle/cnmbination. fitted with non neumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permitte~ br vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by > 13.99%

8 0 la L x 0 - m

: . . 3 m " c 2 C .- 0 - m 0 0

1501

0

250

500

750

loot

125t

150t

0

250

500

750

iooa

1250

1500

0

250

500

750

Reg. 234(1)

-

Reg 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

urn of the wheel massloads of a steerlng axle exceede le max. permiss~ble of 3850 kg. per wheel by 2-3.99%

urn of the wheel massloads of a steering axleexceede e max. permissible of 3850 kg. per wheel by 4-5.99%

urn of the wheel massloads of a steering axle exceede e max. permissible of 3850 kg. per wheel by 6-7.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

um of the wheel massloads of a steering axle exceede e max. permissible of 3850 kg. perwheel by 8-9.99%

urn of the wheel massloads of a steering axle exceede' e max, permissible of 3850 kg. per wheel bylo-I 1.99%

Reg. 234(1) Jm of the wheel massloads of a steering axleexceedel e max. permlssible of 3850 kg. per wheel by 12-13 999

Reg. 234(1) Jm of the wheel massloadsof a steering axle exceedel e rnax. permissible of 3850 kg. per wheel by more thar 5.99% Am of wheel massloads of an axle otherthan a steering :le exceeded the max. permissible of 4000 kg. per whe Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

12-3.99%

Am of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steerin( :le exceeded the rnax. permissible of 4000 kg. per whe

Reg. 234(1) Jm of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steering :le exceeded the rnax. permlssible of 4000 kg. per whe ' 6-7 99%

Reg. 234(1) Im of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steering :le exceeded the rnax. permissible of 4000 kg. per whe , 8-9.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Am of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steerinc :le exceeded the rnax. permissible of 4000 kg. per whe 10-11.99%

Am of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steermc .le exceeded the max. permissible of 4000 kg. per whet 12-13.99%

rm of wheel massloads of an axle other than a steer in^ Reg. 234(1) le exceeded the max, permissible of 4000 kg. per whd

>13.99%

Reg. 234(1) :le rnassload of vehicle/combination with an axle with 2 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 7700 kg. ' a steering axle by 2-3.99%

:le rnassload of vehicle/wmbination with an axle with 2 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 7700 kg.

' a steering axle bv 4-5.99% Reg 234(1)

Reg. 234(1) :le massload of vehiclekombination with an axle with 2 3 wheels exceeded the permissible rnax of 7700 kg. ' a steering axle by 67.99%



,xle massload of vehiclelcombination with an axle with : r 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max, of 7700 kg )r a steering axle by 8-9.99%

xle massload of vehiclelcombination with an axle with : r 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 7700 kg ~r a steering axle by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg 234(1)

-

xle massload of vehiclelcombination with an axle with 2 r 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 7700 kc! Reg. 234(1) ~r a steering axle by 12-13.99%

ule massload of vehiclelcombination with an axle with 2 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max of 7700 ko Reg. 234(1) - . . . . . . - . .--.

r a steering axle by > 13.99%

tle massload of vehicle1combination. fitted with an axle Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

th 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 100 kg. for a non-steering axle by 2-3.99%

tle massload of vehiclelcombination. fitted with an axle th 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max, of I00 kg. for a non-steering axle by 4-5.99%

tle massload of vehiclelcornbination, fitted with an axle th 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 100 kg. for a non-steering axle by 6-7.99%

:le rnassload of vehiclelcornbination. fitted with an axle th 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 100 kg. for a non-steering axle by 8-9.99%

tle massload of vehiclelcombination, fitted with an axle th 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of 100 kg. for a non-steering axle by 10-1 1.99%

Axle massload of vehiclelcornbination. fitted with an axle 3070 Reg 234(1) with 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of

8000 kg, for a non-steering axle by 12-13.99%

Axle rnassload of vehiclelcombination, fitted with an axle' 3071 Reg. 234(1) with 2 or 3 wheels exceeded the permissible max. of1

8000 kg. for a non-steering axle by > 13.99% I

Axle massload of a vehiclelcombination fitted with a 41

3072 Reg, 234(1) wheel axle. designed to compact refuse and which is, carrying such, exceeded the permissible max, of 10200 kg. by 2499%

Axle massload of a vehiclelcomb~nation fitted with a 4

3073 Reg, 234(1) wheel axle. designed to compact refuse and which IS

carrying such, exceeded the permiss~ble rnax. of 10200 kg. by 4 - 5.99%

Axle massload of a vehiclelcombination fitted with a 4

3074 Reg, 234(1) wheel axle. designed to compact refuse and which is carrying such. exceeded the permissible max, of 10200

I kg, by 6-7.99% l h l e rnassload of a vehiclelcornbination fitted with a 41


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I I I

Short charge wording -reference to National Road Traffic Act. 1996

- -

xle rnassload of a veh~clelcomb~nat~on fitted wlth a 4 heel axle, designed to compact refuse and which is xrvina such. exceeded the ~ermissible max. of 1020C

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

, - . 3. by 12-13.99%

xie massload of a vehiclelcombination fitted with a 4 heel axle, designed to compact refuse and which is wrying such, exceeded the permissible max of 10200 2, by > 13.99%

xle massload of a breakdown or combination thereof ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max : 10200 kg. by 2-3.99% wle massload of a breakdown or combination thereof, ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max.

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

10200 kg. by 4-5.99% xle massload of a breakdown or combination thereof, ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceeded the permissible max. 10200 kg. by 6-7.99%

~ l e massload of a breakdown or combination thereof, ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max. 10200 ka bv 8-9.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1) de massload of a breakdown or combination thereof, ted w~th a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max. 10200 kg by 10-1 1.9956

Reg. 234(1) tle massload of a breakdown or combination thereof. ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max. 10200 kg. by 12-13.99%

Reg. 234(1) tle massload of a breakdown or combination thereof, ted with a 4 wheel axle, exceeded the permissible max. 10200 ka. bv > 13.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

tle rnassload of a bus-train or combination of such, with rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the

brmissible max. of 10200 kg. by 2-3.99%

rle massload of a bus-train or combination of such, withl rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the1

:rmissible max. of 10200 kg. by 4-5.99%

:le massload of a bustrain or combination of such, with rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the !rmissible max. of 10200 kg. by 6-7.99%

Reg. 234(1) :le massload of a bus-train or combination of such, with rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the rmissible max. of 10200 k g by 8-9.99%

Reg. 234(1) :le massload of a bustrain or combination of such. with1 rear or mlddle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the rrnissible rnax. of 10200 kg. by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 234(1) :le massload of a bus-train or combination of such, with rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the rmissible rnax. of 10200 kg. by 12-13.99%

Reg. 234(1)

Reg. 234(1)

I

le massload of a bus-train or combination of such, with rear or middle axle with 4 wheels, exceeded the rmissible rnax. of 10200 kg. by >13.99%

le massload of a bus or combination of such, fitted with four wheel axle, exceeded the permissible max, of 200 kg. by 2-3.99% le massload of a bus or combination of such, fitted with four wheel axle, exceeded the permissible max, of 200 ka. bv 4-5.99%

Reg. 234(1)

0

I

I


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO ~egularor - 8 - 8 P x b - m

E hi - f u a P c .- P c 0 -

75C

- I001

-

251

- 501

- 0

- 250

- 500

- 750

- ooc - 25C

- 500

-

0

-

250

- 500

g g- ' Short charge wording -reference to National Road $ g Traffic Act, 1996 ;2

I

Axle massload of a bus or combination of such, fitted wit1 Reg. 234(1) a four wheel axle. exceeded the permissible max. c

)I0200 kg. By 6-7.99%

l ~ x l e massload of a bus or combination of such, fined wit1

10200 kg. by 8-9.99%

10200 ka. bv 10-1 1.99%

Axle massload of a bus or combinat~on of such, fitted witt Reg. 234(1) a four wheel axle. exceeded the permissible max. o

10200 ka. bv 12-1 3.99%

Axle massload of a bus or combination of such, fined w~t t Reg 234(1) la four wheel axle, exceeded the permissible max. o

110200 kg. by > 13.99%

l ~ x l e massload of a vehicleb) or combinat~on of such Reg. 234(1) fitted with a 4 wheel axle, exciededthe permissible max

of 9000 kg. by 2-3.99%

Axle massload of a vehicle(s) or combinat~on of such Reg. 234(1) fitted with a 4 wheel axle. exceededthe permissible max

of 9000 ka. bv 4-5.99%

Axle massload of a vehicle(s) or combination of such, Reg. 234(1) fitted w~th a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissiblemax

of 9000 kg by 6-7.99%

Axle massload of a vehicle(s) or combination of such, Reg. 234(1) fitted with a 4 wheel axle. exceededthe permissiblemax

lof 9000 kg. by 8-9.99%

l ~ x l e massload of a vehiclels) or combmat~on of such. . . Reg 234(1) /fitted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max'

lof 9000 kg. by 10-1 1.99%

l ~ x l e massload of a vehrcle(s) or combination of such. Reg. 234(1) fitted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max

of 9000 kg. by 12-13.99%

Axle massload of a veh~cle(s) or combination of such. Reg 234(1) fitted with a 4 wheel axle, exceededthe permissible max.

of 9000 ko bv > 13.99%

Determined axle unit massloadexceedsthe sum of all the Reg. 235(1) wheel massloads on that axle unit as calculated in

accordance w~th SANS speclf~cations by 2-3.99%)

Determined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the Reg. 235(1) wheel massloads on that axle unit as calculated in

accordance with SANS specifications by 45.99%)

Determined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the

Determined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the

accordance with SANS specificat~ons by 8499%)

Determined axle unit massload exceeds the sum of all the Reg. 235(1) wheel massloads on that axle unit as calculated in / 8 7 8 3 l l l / 1

accordance with SANS specifications by 10-1 1.99)




)etermined axle unit massload exceeds the sum of all the /heel massloads on that axle unit as calculated ir cwrdance with SANS specifications by 12-13.99 kg)

3112 1 Reg 235(l)

letermined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the rheel rnassloads on that axle unit as calculated ir ccordance with SANS specifications by >13.99%)

3113 1 Reg. 235(l)

letermined axle unit massload exceeds the sum of all the fheel rnassloads on that axle unit as approved by the lanufacturer of the tyres by 2-3.99%

etermined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the ,heel rnassloads on that axle unit as approved by the lanufacturer of the tyres by 4-5.99%

etermined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the ,heel massloads on that axle unit as approved by the lanufacturer of the tyres by 6-7.99%

etermined axle unit massloadexceedsthe sum of all the heel rnassloads on that axle unit as approved by the ~anufacturer of the tyres by 8-9.99%

3117 ( Reg 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the heel massloads on that axle unit as approved by the ~anufacturer of the tyres by 10-1 1.99%

etermined axle unit massloadexceedsthe sum of all the heel massloads on that axle unit as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by 12-13.99%

:;;; Reg. 235(l)

Reg. 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload exceedsthe sum of all the heel massloads on that axle unit as approved by the anufacturer of the tyres by >13.99%

3120 1 Reg 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non- ieumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel assloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mm ldth of every tyre on such axle unit by 2-3.99%

etermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non- ieumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel assloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mm idth of every tyre on such axle unit by 4-5.99%

3121 1 Reg. 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload of axle unit w~th non- reumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel assloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mm dth of every tyre on such axle unit by 6-7.99%

Reg. 235(1)

stermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non- leumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel assloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mm dth of every tyre on such axle unit by 8-9.99%

stermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non- leumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the wheel assloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mml dth of every tyre on such axle unit by 10-1 1.99% i

;:3: Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)




letermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non neumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the whee lassloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mrr lidth of every tyre on such axle unit by 12-13.99%

Reg. 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload of axle unit with non neumatic tyres exceeds the sum of all the whee lassloads on that axle unit determined as 8 kg11 mm idth of every tyre on such axle unit by >1 3.99%)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) xle unit massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceed! le perm~ssible rnax. of 2700 kg.laxle by 2-3.99%

Reg 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

xle unit massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceed! e perm~ssible max. of 2700 kg./axle by 4-5.99%

xle unit massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceed! e perm~ssible rnax of 2700 kg /axle by6-7 99%

xle unit massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceed! e permissible rnax of 2700 kg./axle by 8-9.99%

Reg. 235(1) de unlt massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceed! e permissible rnax. of 2700 kg./axle by 10-1 1 99%

Reg. 235(1) de untt massload of axle unit with metal tyres exceeds e permiss~ble rnax of 2700 kg./axle by 12-13.99%

Reg. 235(1) de unit massload of axle unit w~th metal tyres exceed$ e permissible rnax. of 2700 kg./axle by > 13.99%

tle unit massload of vehicle/combination, fitted with non leumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permitted r vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 2-3.99s

Reg. 235(1) 1

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

tle unit massload of vehicle/combination, fitted with non leumatic or metal tyres, exceeds50% of that permitted r vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 4-5.99%

rle unit massload of vehicle/cnmbination. fitted with non leumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permitted vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 6-7.99%

tle unit massload of vehicle/combination, fitted with non ieumatic or metal tyres, exceeds 50% of that permitted . vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 8-9.99%

Axle unit massload of vehicle/cnmbination, fitted with non Reg. 235(1) pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeds50% of that permitted

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 10-1 1.99%

Axle unit massload of vehicle/cnmbination. fitted with non

Axle unit massload of vehicle/combination, fitted with non.

for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by > 13.99%



Short charge wording -reference to National Road Traffic Act. 1996

letermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissiblc iaximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unii iassload of such axle by 2-3.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) letermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissible laximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unii lassload of such axle by 4-5.99%

etermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissible laximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unit lassload of such axle by &7.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) etermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissible laximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unit tassload of such axle by 8-9.99%

etermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissible laximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unit lassload of such axle by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 235(1)

etermined axle unit massload exceeds the permissible laximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unit iassload of such axle by 12-13.99%

Reg. 235(1)

etermmed axle unit massload exceeds the permissible iaximum axle unit massload, being the gross axle unit assload of such axle by > 13.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) nle massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel steering unit tceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg by 2-3.99%

Reg. 235(1) ~ l e massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel steering unit tceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg. by 4-5.99%

xle unit massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel steering unit tceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg.laxle by 6- 99%

ltle massload of a 2 axle. 2 or 3 wheel steering unit tceeded the max, permissible of 15400 kg.laxle by 8- 99%

Reg. 235(1)

- -

Reg 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) de massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel steering unit tceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg.laxle by 10- I 99%

Reg. 235(1) tle massload of a 2 axle. 2 or 3 wheel steering unit :ceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg.laxle by 12- 1.99%

Reg. 235(1) tle massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel steering unit :ceeded the max. permissible of 15400 kg.iaxle by > 1.99%

tle unit massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel non-steering :leunit exceededthe max. permissibleof 16000 kg./axle Reg. 235(1) r 2-3.99% tle unit massload of a 2 axle. 2 or 3 wheel non-steering

Reg. 235(1) :leunit exceededthe max, permissibleof 16000 kg.laxli! ,4-5 99% - ~

tle unit massload of a 2 axle. 2 or 3 wheel non-steering :le unit exceededthe max. permissibleof 16000 kg.laxlel

tle unit massload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel non-steering :leunit exceededthe max. permissibleof 16000 kg.laxle

.leunit exceededthe max. permissible of 16000 kg./axle 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulation I

IS, 2001 I


xle unit rnassload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel non-steerin( xleunit exceededthe max. perrnissibleof 16000 kg./axlt y 12-13.99%

xle unit rnassload of a 2 axle, 2 or 3 wheel non-steerin! xle unit exceeded the max. perrnissible of 16000 kg.laxlc y>13.99%

xle unit rnassload of a 2 axle. 4 wheel unit exceededthe lax. permissible of 20 400 kg./axle by 2-3.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg 235(1)

Reg 235(1)

Reg. 235(1) xle unit massload of a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit exceededthc tax. permissible of 16000 kg./axle by 4-5.99%

Reg. 235(1) xle unit massload of a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit exceededthe tax. permissible of 20 400 kg.laxle by 6-7.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg 235(1)

xle unit rnassload of a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit exceededthe lax. permissible of 20 400 kg laxle by 8-9 99%

xle unit massload of a 2 axle. 4 wheel unit exceededthe lax. perrnissible of 20 400 kg.laxle by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 235(1) xle unit massload of a 2 axle. 4 wheel unlt exceededthe lax permlsstble of 20 400 kg laxle by 12-13 99%

Reg. 235(1) xle unit massload of a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit exceededthe ax. permissible of 20 400 kg.laxle by > I 3.99%

~ l e unit massload of a vehiclelcombination not entioned, fitted with a 2 axle. 4 wheel unit, exceedec e permissible max of 18000 kg./axle by 2-3.99s

de unit massload of a vehiclelcombination not entioned, fitted with a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit, exceedec e permissible max. of 18000 kg.1axle by 4-5.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

de unit massload of a vehiclelcombination not entioned, fitted with a 2 axle, 4 wheel unit, exceedea e perrnisslble rnax. of 18000 kg.laxle by 6-7.99%

tle unit massload of a vehiclelcomb~nation not entioned, fitted with a 2 axle. 4 wheel unit, exceeded e permissible rnax. of 18000 kg./axle by 8-9.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

rle unit massload of a vehicle/combination not entioned, fltted with a 2 axle. 4 wheel unlt, exceeded e permiss~ble max. of 18000 kg./axle by 10-1 1.99%

tle unit massload of a veh~cle/combinat~on not entioned, fitted with a 2 axle. 4 wheel unit, exceeded e permissible max. of 18000 kg.laxle by 12-13.99%

entloned, fitted wlth a 2 axle 4 wheel unit exceede

rle unit massload of a veh~clelcomb~nat~on. with a ?erlng axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels exceedlng dle permlsslble max of 23100 /axle by 2-3 99%



xle unit massload of a vehiclelcombination, with a :eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max. of 23100

I

j./axle by 4-5.99%

xle unit massload of a vehicie/wmbination, with a eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or , wheels, exceeding die permissible max. of 23100

&/axle by 6-7.99%

xle unit massload of a vehiclelcombination, with a eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or

I wheels. exceeding die permissible max. of 23100

>./axle bv 8499%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

xle unit massload of a vehicle/wmbination. with a eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max, of 23100

eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels. exceeding die permissible max. of 23100

1.1axle by 12-13.99%

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

rle unit massload of a vehiclelwmbination, with a eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels. exceeding die permissible max. of 23100

1.1axle by > 13.99% I O

Reg. 235(1)

rle unit massload of a vehicle/wmbination. with a eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or I wheels, exceeding die permissible max, of 24000

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

axle by 2-3.99%

tle unit massload of a vehiclelwmbination. with a] eering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max. of 24000

zering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels. exceeding die permissible max. of 24000

1.1axle bv 6-7 99%

Reg. 235(1)

tle unit massload of a vehicle/wmbination. with a sering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max. of 24000

Reg. 235(1)

Reg. 235(1)

~Iaxle by 8-9.99%

tle unit massload of a veh~clelcombination. with a1 sering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max. of 2400d ./axle by 10-1 1.99%

tie un~t massload of a vehicle/wmbination. with a1 sering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or I wheels, exceeding die permissible max, of 24000 ./axle bv 12-13.99%

Reg. 235(1)

:le unit massload of a vehiclelcombination, with a ?ering axle unit of 3 or more axles, each fitted with 2 or wheels, exceeding die permissible max, of 24000 ./axle by > 13.99% I Reg. 235(1)

:le unit massload of a bus-trainlcombination with a read middle axle unit with 3 or more, 4 wheel axles.

I ceeded the permissible max, of 24000 kg.laxle by 2- 39%

Reg. 235(1)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008 4 5

r

: $ '3 E .? St g E al

Short charge wording -reference to National Road ' .' Traffic Act, 1996 B E

c-2 g m a g I- E : %

.: C .-

rxle unit massload of a bus-trainlcombination with a rear Ir middle axle unit with 3 or more. 4 wheel axles, I !xceeded the permissible max. of 24000 kg.laxle by 4-

10

1.99%

ale unit massload of a bus-trainlcombination with a rear Ir middle axle unit with 3 or more, 4 wheel axles, !xceeded the permisslble max. of 24000 kg.laxle by 6-

ule unit massload of a bus-trainlcombinat~onw~th a rea r middle axle unit with 3 or more 4 wheel axles. ,xceeded the permissible max. of 24000 kg.laxle by 8-

3195 Reg. 235(1)

hxle unit massload of a bus-trainlcombination with a reai r middle axle unit w~th 3 or more, 4 wheel axles. xceeded the permissible max. of 24000 kg.laxle by 10-

1 25

1.99%

3196 Reg. 235(1)

,xle unit massload of a bus-trainlcombination with a rea r middle axle unit with 3 or more 4 wheel axles. xceeded the permissible max, of 24000 kg.laxle by 12-

,xle unit massload of a bus-trainlcombinationwith a rear r middle axle unit wlth 3 or more, 4 wheel axles, xceeded 1 the permissible max. of 24000 kg./axle by

nd axle unit massloads and determined ~n accordan

lax. permissible vehicle mass, as the sum of all the axle nd axle unit massloads and determined in accordance 'ith SANS specifications, was exceeded by 4-5.99%

3200 Reg. 236(1)

3201 Reg. 236(1)

3202 Reg. 236(1)

3203 Reg. 236(1)

3204 Reg. 236(1)

3205 Reg 236(1)

lax. permissible vehicle mass, as the sum of all the axle nd axle unit massloads and determined In accordance ith SANS spec~fications, was exceeded by 6-7.99%

nd axle unlt massloads and determined in accordan ith SANS specifications, was exceeded by 8-9.99%

lax. permissible vehicle mass, as the sum of all the axle i d axle unit massloads and determined In accordance ith SANS specifications, was exceeded by 10-1 1%

lax. perm~ssible vehicle mass, as the sum of all the axle i d axle unit massloads and determined In accordance ith SANS specifications, was exceeded by 12-13%

ax, permissible vehicle mass, as the sum of all the axle i d axle unit massloads and determined in accordance ~ t h SANS specifications, was exceeded by s 13.99%

lax. permissible vehlcle mass, determined as the sum of I the axle and axle unit massloads as specified by the ~anufacturer. was exceeded by 2-3.99%


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2001 3 4 1 5

Max permissible vehicle mass, determined as the sum of Reg. 236(1) all the axle and axle unit massloads as specified by the I

manufacturer of the tyre. was exceeded by 4-5.99% --

Max perm~ssible veh~cle mass, determ~ned as the sum of Reg 236(1) all the axle and axle un~t massloads as spec~fied

manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 6-7 99%

Max. permissible vehicle mass, determined as the sum of Reg. 236(1) all the axle and axle unit massloads as specified by the I

manufacturer of the tyre. was exceeded by 8-9.99%

Max, permissible vehicle mass, determined as the sum of

Max, perm~ssible vehicle mass, determined as the sum of

manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 12-1 3%

Max permissible veh~cle mass, determined as the sum of Reg. 236(1) all the axle and axle unit massloads as spec~fied by the 0

manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 7 13%

Max. permissible vehicle mass, of a vehicle fitted with non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and

Reg' 236(1) axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg./lmm, width of every tyre by 2-3.99%

Max. permissible vehicle mass, of a vehicle fitted with

Reg, 236(1) non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg./lmm, width of

I

every tyre by 4-5.99%


Reg, 236(1) mn-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg./lmm, width of

I

every tyre by 6-7.99%


Reg, 236(1) non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg./lmm. width of every tyre by 8-9.99s


Reg, 236(1) non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm, width of every tyre by 10-1 1.99%

Max permissible vehicle mass, of a vehicle fitted with

Reg, 236(1) non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit rnassloads determined as 8 kg./lmm, width of every tyre by 12-13.99%


Reg. 236(1) non-pneumatic tyres. exceeded the sum of all axle and axle unit rnassloads determined as 8 kg./lmm. width of

0

every tyre by 7 13.99%

Max. permissible vehide mass of vehicle fitted with non- pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle

Reg. 236(1) and axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of that I permitted for vehides fitted with pneumatic tyres by 2- 3.99%


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008 - 8 - 3 L x b - m 0) a ii - m u

a C .- E - m 0) a -

500

-

750

-

WO

-

250

500

-

0

- !50 - ioo - '50

300 - 250 - 500 - 0 - 50

- 00

- 50

- 100

- 9

0) - >" u

2 c .- CI

a S 5

-

250

-

375

-

500

-

625

750

0

- 125 - 250

375 - 500 - j25 - '50

0 - 125

!50

- 175

ioo

-


lax. permissible vehicle mass of vehicle fitted with non. nematic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axlc nd axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of thal ermined for vehicles fitted with pneumatc tyres by 4- .99%

Reg 236(1)

lax. permissible vehicle mass of vehicle fitted with non. ieumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle i d axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of thal srmitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 6- 99%

Reg. 236(1)

ax. permissible vehicle mass of vehicle fitted wiih non- ieumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle i d axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of that mnitted for vehicles fitted wlth pneumatic tyres by 8- 99%

Reg. 236(1)

ax, permissible vehicle mass of veh~cle fitted with non- ieumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle id axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of that ?rrnitted for vehicles f~tted with pneumatic tyres by 10- 1.99%

Reg. 236(1)

ax. permissible vehicle mass of vehicle fitted with non- ~eumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle id axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of that m ined for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by 12- 1.99%

Reg. 236(1)

ax. permissible vehicle mass of vehicle fitted with non- ~eumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle ~d axle unit massloads calculated as 50% of that :rmitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres by > 8.99%

Reg. 236(1)

1

. , lMaximum permissible vehicle mass of 56 000 ko. was1 ney. LJO( 11

lexceeded by 2-3.99%

- . IMaxirnum oermissible vehicle mass of 56 000 ka. wi Keg ZJb(1) - as

exceeded by 4-5.99%

neb LJO( I J lexceeded by 8-9 99% 1 '

,. ,,,.., I ~ a x ~ m u m permlsslble veh.c.e mass of 56 000 ko was) ,

- Reg, 236(1)

,-- ,,,,.,

Maximum permissible vehicle mass of 56 000 kg. was exceeded by 6-7.99% Maximum permissible vehicle mass of 56 000 kg. was ,

Keg. LJD( I )

Reg, 236(1)

Reg, 236(1) Vehicle mass exceededthe maximum permissible. the gross vehicle mass of such vehicle. by 2-33.99%

Reg, 236(1)

exceeded by 10-1 1.99% Maximum permissible vehicle mass of 56 000 kg. was exceeded by 12-1 3.99%

Reg, 236(1) Vehicle mass exceeded the maximum permissible, being the gross vehicle mass of such vehicle. by 8-9.99%

I

I

Maximum permissible vehtcle mass of 56 000 kg. was exceeded by > 13.99%

Reg, 236(1)

Reg, 236(1)

0

Vehicle mass exceeded the maximum permissible, being the gross vehicle mass of such vehicle, by 4-5.99%

Vehicle mass exceeded the maximum permissible. being the gross vehcle mass of such vehicle, by 6-7.99%

I

I




'chicle mass exceeds the permissible max, whethe~ den or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massloadr f the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 8-9.99%

Reg. 236(1)

'ehicle mass exceeds the permissible max, whethe! den or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massloada 1 the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 236(1)

Reg. 236(1) ehicle mass exceeds the permissible max, whether den or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massloads f the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 12-13.99%

ehicle mass exceeds the permissible max, whether den or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massloads 'the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by >13.99%

Reg. 236(1)

~ -~ --

xle mass of a group of axles exceeded the massload wrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance ?tween the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last tle of such group (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) I 2-3.99%

de mass of a group of axles exceeded the massload irrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distancei ?tween the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last :le of such group ( ~ n 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) ' 4-5.99%

Reg. 236(1)

Reg. 236(1)

Reg. 236(1)

tie mass of a group of axles exceeded the massload ~rrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance !tween the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last :leof such group (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) 6-7.99%

Axle mass of a group of axles exceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance

Reg. 236(1) between the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last I axleof such group (ln 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 8-9.99%

Axle mass of a group of axles exceeded the massload carrylng capacity of bridges (determmed as the distance

Reg. 236(1) between the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last I axleof such group (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 10-1 1.99%


Reg. 236(1) between the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last I axleof such group ( ~ n 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 12-13.99%


Reg. 236(1) between the centre of 1st axle to the centre of the last 0 axleof such group (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 7 13.99%

Axle mass between any 2 axles exceeded the massload

Reg, 236(1) carrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the 1 st axle to the centre of the 2nd I

axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 2-3.99%


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 1 " I

- 8 - 5: z x b - m 0 P

a? - 9

0

2 c .- z C

P -

500

750

000

250

-

500

0

-

!50

ioo

-

'50

DO0

250

-

500

-

0

-

a? - 0 -- C 0 ' a Short charge wording - reference to National Road t 0 ?!h Traffic Act, 1996 5;" S 0 g n

Axle mass between any 2 axles exceeded the massloac

between the centre of the 1 st axle to the centre of the 2nc axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 4 - 5.99%


Reg, 236(1) carrying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the centre of the 2nc axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 6 - 7.99%


Reg, 236(1) cartying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the I st axle to the centre of the 2nd axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 8-9.99%


Reg 236(1) cartying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the centre of the 2nd axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 10-1 1.99%


Reg, 236(1) cartying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the 1 st axle to the centre of the 2nd axle (in 1110th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by 12-13.99%


Reg, 236(1) cartying capacity of bridges (determined as the distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the centre of the 2nd axle (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + 18000) by > 13.99%

Max. permissible combination mass, as the sum of all the

accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by

accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by 4-5 99%

Max. perm~ssible combination mass, as the sum of all the

Reg, 237(1) axle and axle unit massloads and determined in accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by 6-7.99% I Max. permissible combination mass, as the sum of all the,

Reg, 237(1) axle and axle unit rnassloads and determined in accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by 8-9.99%

Max. permissible combination mass, as the sum of all the

Reg. 237(1) axle and axle unit rnassloads and determined in accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by 10-1 1.99%.

Max. permissiblecombination mass, asthe sum of all the axle and axle unit rnassloads and determtned in accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by 12-13.99%

Max, permissible combination mass, as the sum of all the axle and axle unit massloads and determined in accordance with SANS specifications, was exceeded by > 13.99%




lax. permissible combination mass, determined as the um of all the axle and axle unit rnassloads as specifiet y the manufacturer, was exceeded by 2-3.99%

lax permissible combination mass, determined as the urn of all the axle and axle unit massloads as specifiec y the manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 4- .99%

lax. permissible combination mass, determmed as the um of all the axle and axle unit massloads as specifiec y the manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 6- .99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

lax. permissible combination mass, determined as the Jm of all the axle and axle unit massloads as specifiec y the manufacturer of the lyre, was exceeded by & 99%

lax, permissible combination mass, determined as the dm of all the axle and axle unit massloads as specifiea y the manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 10- 1.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

lax, permissible combination mass, determmed as the Jrn of all the axle and axle un~t massloads as specified

the manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by 12- 3.99%

Reg. 237(1)

lax. permissible combination mass, determined as the Im of all the axle and axle unit massloads as specified 1 the manufacturer of the tyre, was exceeded by > 3.99%

ax, permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted ith non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle i d axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm. width every tyre by 2-3.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

ax. permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted ith non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle i d axle unit rnassloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm. width every tyre by 4-5.99%

Reg. 237(1)

ax permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted th non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle ~d axle unit massloadsdetermined as 8 kg.11 mm. width every tyre by 6-7.99%

Reg. 237(1)

ax. permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted, th non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle' ~d axle unit massloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm, width! every tyre by 8-9.99%

th non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle 1d axleunit massloadsdetermined as 8 kgl lmm. width every tyre by 10-1 1.99%

Reg 237(1)

Reg 237(1)

ax. permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted th non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle ~d axle unit rnassloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm, width evew lvre bv 12-1 3.99%

Reg. 237(1)

ax. permissible combination mass, of a vehicle fitted th non-pneumatic tyres, exceeded the sum of all axle ~d axleunit massloads determined as 8 kg.11 mm. width every tyre by > 13.99%

Reg. 237(1) 1


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 200t I I


Reg. 237(1) ombination mass of a vehicle fitted with metal tyres etermined as the sum of all the axle rnassloads at 2 70C 3. per axle, was exceeded by 2-3.99%

Reg. 237(1) ombination mass of a vehicle fined with metal tyres etermined as the sum of all the axle rnassloads at 2 70C 3 . per axle, was exceeded by 4-5.99%

ombination mass of a vehicle fitted with metal tyres atermined as the sum of all the axle rnassloads at 2 70C 1. per axle, was exceeded by 6-7.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

ombination mass of a vehicle fitted with metal tyres, stermined as the sum of all the axle massloads at 2 70C 3. per axie, was exceeded by 8-9.99%

ombination mass of a vehicle fined with metal tyres, ~termined as the sum of all the axle rnassloads at 2 700 I. per axle. was exceeded bv 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 237(1) ornbination mass of a vehicle fitted with metal tyres, ?termined as the sum of all the axle massloads at 2 700 3 . per axle, was exceeded by 12-13.99%

ornbination mass of a vehicle fitted with metal tyres. %ermined as the sum of all the axle massloads at 2 700 1. per axle, was exceeded by > 13.99%

ax. permissible combination mass of vehicle fitted with )n-pneumatic or metal tyres, exceeded the sum of all tle and axle unit rnassloads calculated as 50% of that zrrn~tted for vehicles fitted w~th pneumat~c tyres by 2- 99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Jm of all axle and axle unit rnassloads calculated as )% of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic res exceededthe mar. permissible of vehicle fitted with ~n-pneumatic or metal tyres by 4-5.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Jm of all axle and axle unit rnassloads calculated as 1% of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic res exceededthe rnax. permissible of vehicle fitted with ~n-pneumatic or metal tyres by 6-7.99%

m of all axle and axle unit massloads calculated as I% of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic .es exceededthe rnax. permissible of vehicle fitted with ~n-pneumatic or metal tyres by 8499%

Im of all axle and axle unit massloads calculated as I% of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic .es exceededthe rnax. permissible of vehicle f~ned w~th ~n-pneumatic or metal tyres by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

im of all axle and axle unit massloads calculated as 1 % of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic es exceededthe max. permissible of vehicle fitted with ~n-pneumatic or metal tyres by 12-13.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Im of all axle and axle unit rnassloads calculated as, 1% of that permitted for vehicles fitted with pneumatic ,es exceeded the max. permissible of vehicle fitted with1 n-pneumatic or metal tyres by > 13.99%

I

aximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg. is exceeded by 2-3.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)


I SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Reaulations. 2008


Reg 237(1) Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg was exceeded by 4-5.99%

Reg, 237(1) Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg was exceeded by 6-7.99% Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg

Reg 237(1) was exceeded by 8-9.99%

Reg, 237(1) Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg was exceeded by 10-1 1.99%

Reg, 237(1) Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg was exceeded by 12-1 3.99% Maximum permissible combination mass of 56 000 kg

Reg' 237(1) was exceeded by > 13.99% lCombination mass exceeded the maximum permissible

Reg. 237(1) being the gross combination mass of such vehicle, by 2-

Combination mass exceeded the maximum permissible, Reg. 237(1) 1 being the gross combination mass of such vehicle, by 8-

9.99%

Combination mass exceeded the maximum permtssible, Reg. 237(1) being the gross combination mass of such vehicle. by 10-

111.99%

lCombination mass exceeded the maximum permissible. Reg 237(1) be~ng the gross combmation mass of such vehicle, by 12-

173 99%

Combination mass exceeded the maximum permissible. Reg. 237(1) being the gross combination mass of such vehicle. by >

13.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible maximum,

Reg. 237(1) whether laden or unladen. arrived at by multiplying the net power In kW X 400 for a tractor and kW X 240 for other vehicles. as determined by SANS 013. by 2-3.99%


Reg 237(1) whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying the net power in kW X 400 for a tractor and kW X 240 for other vehicles. as determined by SANS 013, by 4-5.99%


Reg, 237(1) whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying the net power in kW X 400 for a tractor and kW X 240 for other vehicles, as determined by SANS 013, by 6-7.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible maximum.

3320 Reg, 237(1) whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying the net power in kW X 400 for a tractor and kW X 240 for other vehicles, as determined by SANS 013. by 8-9.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible maximum, whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying the

Reg. 237(1) net power in kW X 400 for a tractor and kW X 240 for other veh~cles, as determined by SANS 013, by 10- 11.99%


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 3 1 - 4

m a

2 ID

!?I .- 8 s c g 2 d 'l Short charge wording - reference to National Road E $ Traffic Act, 1996

B o a m g 2

Combination mass exceeds the permissible maximum whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying thc

other vehicles, as determined by SANS 013, by 12

Combination mass exceeds the permissible maximum whether laden or unladen, arrived at by multiplying the

other vehicles, as determined by SANS 01 3, exceeded b)

Combmation mass exceedsthe permissible max, whethe Reg. 237(1) laden or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massload!

of the d r m g axle or axles of such vehicle by 2-3.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible rnax, whethe1 Reg. 237(1) laden or uniaden. determined as 5X total axle massload:

of the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 4-5.99% - -

Combmatlon mass exceedsthe perm~ss~ble rnax, whethe~ Reg 237(1) laden or unladen, determlned as 5X total axle massload5

of the dnvlng axle or axles of such veh~cle by 6-7 99%

I Combination mass exceeds the permissible rnax, whethel Reg. 237(1) laden or unladen, determined as 5X total axle rnassload:

of the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 8-9.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible max, whether Reg. 237(1) laden or unladen, determined as 5X total axle massloads

of the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 10-1 1.99%

Combination mass exceeds the permissible max, whether Reg. 237(1) laden or unladen. determrned as 5X total axle massloads

of the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by 12-13.99% -

Combination mass exceedsthe permissible rnax, whethe Reg. 237(1) laden or unladen. determined as 5X total axle massload!

of the driving axle or axles of such vehicle by >13.99%

Axle mass of a group of axksof a combination exceedec the rnassload carrying capacity of bridges (=distanm

Reg. 237(1) between the centresof the 2 axlesof such group (in 1HO th of a meter) X2100 + 18000), by 2-3.99%

Axle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedec

Reg 237(1) the massload carrying capacity of bridges (=distance between the centres of the 2 axles of such group (in 1HO th of a meter) X2100 + 18000). by 4-5.99%

Axle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedec

Reg. 237(1) the massload carrying capacity of bridges (=distance between the centres of the 2 axles of such group (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + 18000). by 6-7.99%

Axle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedeo

between the centres of the 2 axles of such group (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + 18000), by 8-9.99%

STAATSKOERANT, 1 6 JULl E 2008 No. 31242 155



xle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedec le massload carrying capacity of bridges (=distancf ehveen the centres of the 2 axlesof such group (in 1/1C I of a meter) X2100 + 18000), by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 237(1)

A tt b' tt - A tt bl tt - A tP bl th - A e) (= a 11 - A: e)

(= CE

1 t - A: er

(= CE

1E - A) em

(= ce 1e 7

A, ex (= ce 1e - A, ex

(= ce 18 -

A, exceeded the massload.carrying capacity of bridges

xle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedec le massload carrying capacity of bridges (=distance etween the centres of the 2 axles of such group (in l l l C I of a meter) X2100 + 18000). by 12-13.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

(=distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the centre of the 2nd axle (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 +

18000), by > 13.99%

xle mass of a group of axles of a combination exceedec le massload carrying capacity of bridges (=distance stween the centres of the 2 axlesof such group (in 1110 I of a meter) X2100 + 18000), by > 13.99%

xle mass between any 2 axles of a combination tceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges :distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the mtre of the 2nd axle ( ~ n 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + 3000), by 2-3 99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg 237(1)

nle mass behveen any 2 axles of a combination tceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges distance behveen the centre of the 1st axle to the mtre of the 2nd axle (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + 1000). by 4-5.99%

Reg. 237(1)

de mass behveen any 2 axles of a combination reeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges distance behveen the centre of the 1st axle to the mtre of the 2nd axle ( ~ n 1110 th of a meter) X2100 + IOOO), by 6-7 99%

tle mass behveen any 2 axles of a combination :ceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges distance behveen the centre of the 1st axle to the ntre of the 2nd axle (in 1110 th of a meter) X2100 + IOOO). by 8-9.99%

tle mass behveen any 2 axles of a combination :ceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the ,ntre of the 2nd axle (in 1/10 th of a meter) X2100 + IOOO), by 10-1 1.99%

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Reg. 237(1)

Reg 237(1)

tle mass behveen any 2 axles of a combination :ceeded the massload carrying capacity of bridges distance between the centre of the 1st axle to the mntre of the 2nd axle (in 1110 th of a meter) X2100 + i000), by 12-13.99%

:le mass between any 2 axles of a combination1

Reg, 241

Determined total axle mass load between axles, measured between any two axles of the combination exceeds the massload carrymg capacity of bridges as calculated in accordance with this regulation, by 2-3.99%


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, I I I I


Determmed total axle mass load between axles

Reg, 241 measured between any two axles of the combinatior exceeds the massload carrying capacity of bridges a$ calculated in accordance with this regulation. 4-5.99%

Determined total axle mass load between axles

Reg, 241 measured between any two axles of the combinatior exceeds the massload carrying capacity of brldges as calculated in accordance with this regulation, 6-7.99%

Determined total axle mass load between axles

Reg, 241 measured between any two axles of the combination exceeds the massload carlying capacity of br~dges as calculated in accordance with this regulation, 8-9.99%

Determined total axle mass load between axles,

Reg, 241 measured between any two axles of the combination exceeds the massload carlying capacity of bridges as calculated in accordance wlth this regulation, 10-1 1.99%

Determined total axle mass load between axles,

Reg, 241 measured between any two axles of the combination exceeds the massload carrying capacity of bridges as calculated in accordance with this regulation, 12-13.99%

Determined total axle mass load between axles.

Reg, 24, measured between any two axles of the combination exceeds the massload carrying capacity of bridges as calculated in accordance with this regulation, > 13.99%

Combinat~on of which the determined axle mass of any group of axlesexceeds the massload carrying capacity of

Reg' 241 bridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, by 2-3.99%

Combination of which the determined axle mass of any

Reg, 241 group of axles exceeds the massload carrying capacity of bridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, by 4-5.99% I


Reg, 241 group of axles exceeds the massload carrying capacity of bridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, by 6-7.99%


22 3355 Reg, 241 group of axles exceedsthe massload carrying capacity of bridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, by 8-9.99%

Combmation of which the determined axle mass of any

23 3356 Reg. 241 group of axles exceedsthe massload carrying capacity of bridges calculated ~n accordance with this regulation, by

I

10-1 1.99%

Combination of which the determined axle mass of any group of axles exceeds the massload carrying capacity of 24 3357 Reg. 241 bridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, by

I

12-13.99%



ombination of which the determined axle mass of an) roup of axles exceedsthe massload carrying capacity o ridges calculated in accordance with this regulation, b) 13.99%

Reg. 241

lperated a vehicle whilst on an axle w~th two tyres the ,heel massload on one tyre exceeded the whee lassload of the other tyre by more than 10% to wit b)

Reg. 242(a)(1)

Reg. 242(a)(i)

3.1-20%

Derated a vehicle whilst on an axle with two tvres the heel massload on one tyre exceeded the whee lassload of the other tyre by more than 10% to wit b) 3.1-30%

perated a vehicle whllst on an axle with two tyres the heel massload on one tyre exceeded the whee assload of the other tyre by more than 10% to wit by I>%

Reg. 242(a)(i)

perated vehicle whilst on an axle with four tyres the heel massload on two tyres nearest to each othe~ tceeded the wheel massload on the other two tyres by ore than 10% to wit by 10 1.20%

Reg. 242(a)(li)

perated vehicle whllst on an axle with four tyres the heel massload on two tyres nearest to each othe~ tceeded the wheel massload on the other two tyres by ore than 10% to wit by 20.1-30%

perated vehicle whilst on an axle with four tyres the heel massload on two tyres nearest to each othei :ceeded the wheel massload on the other two tyres by ore than 10% to wit by > 30%

perated a combination of vehicles whilst the axle assload of any steering axle or the sum of the axle assloads of any steerlng axle unit was less than 11 % of e sum of all axlemassloadsof such vehicle to wit by 08 1.9%

perated a combination of vehicles whilst the axle assload of any steering axle or the sum of the axle assloadsof any steering axle unit was less than 11 % of 5 sum of all axle massloadsof such vehicle to wit by 04 3%

Reg 242(a)(i1)

Reg. 242(a)(1i)

Reg. 242(b)

Reg. 242(b)

~erated a combination of vehicles whilst the axle nssload of any steenng axle or the sum of the axle assloads of any steering axle unit was less than 11 % of s sum of all axle massloadsof such vehicle to wit by 00 3%

thicie, not as in paragraph (b), with a steering axle unit, iilst the sum of the axle massloads of such steering le unit was less than 30% of the sum of all axle assloads of such vehicle to wit minus 20-29.9%

?hide, not as in paragraph(b), w~th a steermg axieunit, iilst the sum of the axle massloads of such steering le unit was less than 30% of the sum of all axle 3ssloads of such vehicle to wit minus 10-19.9%

?hlcle, not as In paragraph(b), w~th a steerlng axleunlt, ~1st the sum of the axle massloads of such steenng le unlt was less than 30% of the sum of all axle assloads of such vehicle to w ~ t mlnus 00-9 9%



'chicle, not as in paragraphs (a). (b) or (c) of regulatior 41, whilst the mass loads of the steering axle was les! ran 20 % of the sum of all axle mass loads to wit 14. 9 99%

Reg. 242(c)

khicle, not as in paragraphs (a). (b) or (c) of regulatior 41, whilst the mass loads of the steering axle was less ran 20 % of the sum of all axle mass loads to wit 07.

Reg. 242(d)

3.9%

'ehicle, not as in paragraphs(a). (b) or (c) of regulatior 41, whilst the mass loads of the steering axle was less Ian 20 % of the sum of all axle mass loads to wit 00. .9%

Reg. 242(d)

Reg. 242(d) lperated a tractor whilst the mass loads of the steerin5 ~ l e was less than 12% of the sum of all axle mass loads )wit 11.99-11% loerated a tractor whilst the mass loads of the steerin<

Reg. 242(d) xle was less than 12% of the sum of all axle mass loadi I wit i n ss-I 0%

lperated a tractor whilst the mass loads of the steerin5 xle was less than 12% of the sum of all axle mass loads )wit < lo %

Reg. 242(d)

khicle registered< 1-1-1989 with GVM <3500 kg, while )ere was not displayed in a conspicuous position on the !R side thereof in letters and figures of not less than 40 Im, in height, information as specified in this regulation

ehicle registered < 1-1-1989 with GVM > 3500 kg. or tgistered on or after 1-1-1989, trailer, adaptor, or mverter dolly without the required particulars clearly nprinted or stamped on a metal plate or plates affixedas rescribed

ractor not fitted with a metal plate on which was iprinted with the information as prescribed in this :gulation

us or minibus, with GVM >3 500 kg. or for the mveyance of 9 > persons, including the driver; or for !ward, without a notice stating the informationas set out subregulation (2)

LTTA mini- midi- or bus not conspicuously displaying side the vehicle in numerals of at least 75 millimetres gh, a notice stating the load that may be carried as set A in subreaulation (2)

Reg. 244

Reg. 245(1)

Reg 245(2)

Reg. 245A(1)

Reg. 245A(3) ehicle of which the requirements for wheelchairs and ichorage did not comply with SANS 10370 ~ecifications

Reg. 246(a) ehicle carrying goods in such a manner as to come into mtact with the surface of the road on which the vehicle as being operated

ehicle carrying goods in such a manner as to obscure e driver's view of traffic to the front or on either side or s view in the rear-view mirror or mlrrors of traffic to the

Reg. 246(b)

ehicle carrying goods not: safely contained within the 3dy of the vehicle, securely fastened to the vehicle, apefly protected from being dislodged or spilled

Reg. 246(c)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, 2008 I 4 I 5 1 6 1

lotor car carrying goods on the roof thereof with the eight of such goods measured from the highest point of

I ,e roof exceeding one-halfof the height of the motor car, leasured from ground level

Reg. 246(d)

ehicle carrying goods in any wntainerw~th provision for ~stening by means of twist locks, with a container not 1 scurely fastened by at least four twist locks

Reg. 246(e)

oods veh~cle wnveylng seated persons not enclosed to he~ght of at least 350 mm aboveseat surface or not In a lanner and w~th materlal of suffic~ent strength to prevent le person from falhng when In motton

Reg. 247(a)

oods vehicle conveying standing persons not enclosed I a height of at least 900 mm above standing surface or ,t in a manner and with material of sufficient strength to

oods vehlcle w~th persons in goods department with an 101s or goods without a partition between persons and >ads beina wnveved

Reg. 247(b)

Reg. 247

'16'

1167

1168

1169

1170

1172

1173

1174

1175

3408

3409

3410

3411

3412

3413

3414

3415

3416

3417

Reg' 252(1)(d)

Reg 252(1)(e)

Reg. 252(1)(f)

Reg 252(1)(9)

Reg. 252(1)(i)

Reg. 252(2)

Reg 252(2)

Reg, 252(2)(c)

Reg, 252(2)(c)

Reg. 253H

regulations concerning emergency exits on upper deck

Minibuslemergency exits that were too small or could not open from inside and outside Minibus1 emergency exits incorrectly positioned Minibusl escape hatcheslknock out windows etc. not adequately marked

Minibusl passenger entranceon right hand side of vehiclr:

Min~bus or bus converted from a goods vehicle with openings not complying with regulation 252(1)(e)

Minibus or rnidibus emergency exits did not comply with the requirements of standard specifications SANS 20107

Minibus or midibus operating in terms the NLTTA which did carry standing persons

Minibus or midibus operating in terms of the NLTTA with a ceiling height not at least 1.75 metres

Operated mini, midi or bus without doors or other barriers

I

I

I

I

1

1

I

I

I

I

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)

49(d)


SCHEDULE 3: AARTO Regulations, I I

- 8 - 0

P x b - a S P

a - m

-0

2 E .- b - m 0 P -

I OOC - i OOC - I OOC - I OOC

- OOC - I OOC - OOC - 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 -

000

-

000

- 000

-

000

-

000

- 000

-

000

- 000 -


~lini, midi or bus operatedwhiie doors not closed when il ma in rnntion ,1176 1 3418 1 Reg. 253(b)

h; I 1 Reg 254

Reg 255(1)(a)

)ouble-deck bus did not have a hand rail on stairlstai~ angerous fiin~bus did not have an unimpaired passageway 01 sssageway that was wide enough

Oidibus or bus did not have unimpeded passagewaysol assageways that were wide enough

,us did not have an adjustable/properly installed driver?

1179 1 342, I Reg. 255(2)

I I

1180 3422 Reg. 256(1) eat

linibuslbus not fitted w~th seat backrests - seats d ~ d no1 1181 1 3423 / Reg. 256(2)(a) omply with specified requirements

linibus seat did not have a height of at least 250mm

Reg. 256(2)(d)

om floor to seat level linibus seat depth not measuring 340mm linibus with seats not complying with width

I~n~bus seats facing partlt~on etc not at least 570rnrn

!ln~bus seats faclnq each other ~ess than 1200mm apafl 1186 1 3428 1 Reg. 256(2)(f) torn backrest to backrest)

linibus seats facing in the same direction less than 70mm from backrest to back of seat in front of it

Reg. 256(5)

1190 3432 Reg. 256(6)(a)(i)

us did not have a rail or partition at seat facmg an ntrance

lini, midi or bus operated while every seat was not acurely anchored lini, midi or bus dimensions of backrest of seats that ,ere not according to specifications

LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 with a seat for passenger not having a seat height from the floor or

lotrest of such seat to seat level of at least 400 mrn. 1191 1 3433 / Reg. Z56(6)(b)

1 9 2 1 3434 1 Reg. 256(6)(c) LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 with a seat for passengernot having a seat depth from the front of the sat to the front of the backrest of at least 400 rnm.

LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 with a seat for passenger not having seat width in accordance with

!gulation 233(2)

LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 where a seat Ices a partition or similar obstruction, a horizontal stance between the front of the backrest of such seat at ?at level to such partition or obstruction was not at least 10 mm.

LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 where seats ce each other, distance between the fronts of the sckrests of such seats at seat level were not at least 300 mm.

LTTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 with a seat cing in the same direction, a horizontal distance ?tween seats not of at least 600 rnm.

1194 1 3436 1 Reg. 256(6)(e)

11 96 1 3438 I Reg. 256(6)(g)

1197 1 3439 I Reg. 256(6)(h) LLTA vehicle registered after 04-9-2006 with a seat for passenger not having seats and anchorages that meet e requirements of SANS 1429 i perated a minibus with a fold-up or jockey seat

I I

1198 1 3440 1 Reg. 256(7)

CONTINUES ON PAGE I PART 2

Date post:	22-Sep-2019
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act ... regulation 16 july 2008 schedule3...

Documents