mario rodriguez

school of architecture and community designuniversity of south florida

a d v a n c e d

d e s i g n

portfolio

a d v a n c e d

d e s i g n

portfolio

contact info:

Mario rodriGueZMrodri16@Mail.usf.edu

CiviCliZed99@yahoo.CoM561-703-8807

DESiGN AA

DESiGN CA

K.i.t. CHArrEttEK

USf CHArrEttE U

fAll 2009

SUMMEr 2009

SUMMEr 2009

SUMMEr 2009

6-15

16-25

26-31

32-37

DESiGN BB

SolAr DECAtHloN S

DESiGN DEVElopMENt D

rEVit r

fAll 2009

SpriNG 2010

SUMMEr 2010

SUMMEr 2010

38-49

50-55

56-63

56-63

6

noah nothing teaching and caring center

advanced design adesign/build studio sp

ring

200

9

sa+cd7

8

for the sprinG 2009 seMester. the de-

siGn/build studio featured as a projeCt

the developMent of a 2000sf faCility who-

se Main funCtion will be to serve as food

pantry and CoMMunity spaCe for the noah

nothinG teaChinG and CarinG Center. the

desiGn of suCh a plaCe inCluded a wide

ranGe of ChallenGes in terMs of both de-

siGn and ConstruCtion, whiCh provided a

Great opportunity for us to expand our

learninG experienCe throuGh a hands on

approaCh. beyond the traditional desiGn

studio ChallenGes, the Group aspeCt of

the Class provided an extra level of CoM-

plexity that is not present in Most arChi-

teCture studios where the eMphasis is on

individual solutions. this projeCt was

also a Great opportunity for the sChool

and students to Continue developinG

CoMMunity links whiCh were beinG esta-

blished in previous years with loCal pro-

fessionals and ContraCtors. the intense

work paCe and dediCation of all the teaM

MeMbers and Contributors hiGhliGhts the

understandinG of the soCial and Moral

responsibility that arChiteCts and Con-

traCtors have with their neiGhborhoods.

prEliMiNArY SCHEMEp

SCHEMAtiC DESiGN GroUp Ssasha dalla Costa

taMMy rifeMario rodriGueZ

GeorGe sCarfe

9

2 4

6

1

5

8

9

73

DESiGN DEVElopMENt pHASED

floor plANp

10

ENtrY SCENE E

oUtDoor DECK ArEA D1. entry deCk

2. lobby/Main offiCe

3. food pantry/storaGe

4. CoMMunity GatherinG spaCe

5. CoMputer aCess rooM

6. outdoor deCk

7. equip. storaGe

8. kitChen

9. private Garden

11

fiNAl propoSAl fDESiGN-A tEAM

A

DESIGN-A TEAM

Chablis applewhitebrandon bartle

joshua jonespaul MartineZ

dana nielsenMario rodriGueZ

12

13

CoNStrUCtioN DoCUMENtS

C

14

CoNStrUCtioN SEqUENCE

S

1. february 2009

2. May 2009

3. june2009

4. auGust 2009

1

2

34

15

design groupbrandon bartle

dana nielsenMario rodriGueZ

16

nishioji complex_kyoto_japan

advanced design c summ

er 2

009

sa+cd17

ExiStiNG DENSitY

D

projECt SitES

nishioji jr station CoMplexsouth-west kyoto, japan

34o 58’ 45” n 135o 44’ 22” e

wArEHoUSE CoMplExw

StorMwAtEr CANAlS

the projeCt foCus is an industrial CoMplex that is beinG phased out to allow the exis-tinG residential neiGhborhood spaCe for ex-pansion. the CoMplex is CoMposed of 30-40 ft hiGh warahouses alMost 500 ft lonG, borde-red by a storM water Canal and an extensive railway.

18

propoSED p

20

ExiStiNG

E

with the inCreased density of the inCoMinG residential bloCks, the projeCt solution foCused on providinG

the site with the supportinG serviCes and aMenities. onCe this portion is CoMplete, it would serve a Model

for the reMainder of the industrial areas that oCuppy priMe spaCe within the City. the Main aspeCt of the

proposal was to take Major existinG eleMents and turn theM into assets of the CoMMunity.

main strategies- expend jr station to handle inCreased voluMe- widen storM water Canal with a publiC use spaCe whiCh hiGhliGhts the iMportanCe of water in kyoto- allow a larGe plot of land to reMain open for aGriCultural use as it is already widely aCCepted throuGh out the City.- add rail Car line runinG throuGh the CoMMerCial portion of the site, shrinkinG travel distanCe froM the site to the rest of the City

21

fiGUrE_GroUNDf BloCK pAttErNB lAND USEl

propoSED

pExiStiNG

E

22

lAND USE

liGHt rAil trACKt

liGHt rAil StAtioNS

23

jr StAtioNrCroSS SECtioN

S

24

with the expanded jr station, there is an opportunity to bridGe the Gap between the two sides of the rail traCks, whiCh at points stretCh over 100 ft aCross.

23

design group3 usf students

2 k.i.t. students

26

k.i.t._kyoto_japan

three houses_charrette summ

er 2

009

sa+cd27

oDoi SitE

S

28

CorNEr HoUSEC

DoUBlE HoUSED

row HoUSEr

29

GroUND lEVEl1 SECoND lEVEl2

4-1/2 tAtAMi MAt rooM

r

tAtAMi MoDUlE

1

.955 M

1.91 M

althouGh the houses have a ConteMporary approaCh, the traditional Method of siZinG rooMs and spaCes is Carried on; the tataMi Mat serves as the basis for the layout of floor plan MuCh like traditional MaChiya

30

CorNEr HoUSE

C

31

multi-family dweling category

1st plaCe

32

lakeland housing typology

all-school charrette fall

200

9

sa+cd33

the desiGn of our duplex for the parker street neiGhborhood is based on intertwininG and ConjoininG neiGhbors yet still allowinG for individual faMily seClusion. hierarChiCal walls in the duplex siMultaneously ConneCt and divide, leadinG to interaCtion and privaCy. while the two sides of the duplex physiCally overlap, the hoMes theMselves feel indepen-dent and distinCt. the duplex is an affordable option beCause it is desiGned on a Grid based on struCtural insulated panels (sip), allowinG houses to be ConstruCted relatively quiCkly. sip panes are Made of riGid plastiC insulation between struCtural layers of oriented strand board (osb), an eCo-friendly Material. these panels are very stronG, enerGy-effiCient and Cost-effeCtive. shorter ConstruCtion tiMe and less job-site waste lead to a More Cost-effiCient buildinG Material than norMal wood fraMe ConstruCtion. also, the insulatinG effiCienCy of sip panels is 97%, while norMal wood fraMe ConstruCtion has an effiCienCy of only 50%. the better insulatinG properties of sip panels lead to lower air ConditioninG Costs. the duplex would be Clad in CorruGated aluMinuM, a Cost-effiCient Material, whiCh eli-Minates the need for paintinG, Can withstand hurriCane forCe winds without beinG daMaGed, and proteCts the exterior of the buildinG. the duplex would be More durable beCause aluMi-nuM is suCh a low-MaintenanCe Material. a wood sCreen on the south side of the du-plex provides filtered shade and allows less heat to penetrate into the voluMe of Glass, while still providinG aMple natural liGht. ar-tifiCial liGhtinG would be used less, leadinG to less enerGy ConsuMption. the sCreen on the north faCe of the duplex, aids in establishinG Measures of privaCy.

lAKElAND SitEl

wESt ElEVAtioNw

AxoNoMEtriC DiAGrAM A

floor area allocations:

Master bed 224 sq ft bedrooM 1 140 sq ft bedrooM 2 150 sq ft

upper bath 60 sq ft

Ground flr 611 sq ft seCond flr 728 sq ft

total: 1339 sq ft

34

SoUtH ElEVAtioN S

GroUND lEVEl1

SECoND lEVEl2

35

SoUtH-EASt CorNEr

C

Sip wAll DEtAilD

iNtErior SpACEi

SECtioN A-A

S

36

SECtioN B-B

w

37

38

park_scape riverfront complex

advanced design b fall

200

9

sa+cd39

pArKp

ACtiVitY

A

a proteCted area in a natural, seMi-natural or Cons-

truCted environMent whiCh is set aside for huMan

reCreation and enjoyMent. it May Consist of roCks.

soil, water and fauna.

- live

- work

- play

- shop

- eat

- entertain

- reCreate

pArK_SCApEp

projECt loCAtioN

l

82o 27’ 41” w

a seamless combination of landscape features shaped and informed by human activity and programatic issues, adressing Questions of connection, accessibility, and security.

40

lANDSCApEl

ElEMENtSE

CoMprises the visible features of an area of land, inCludinG

physiCal eleMents suCh as landforMs, livinG eleMents of

fauna and flora, abstraCt eleMents like liGhtinG and weather

Conditions and huMan eleMents suCh as aCtivity and the built

environMent

- physiCal

- abstraCt

- huMan

27o 56’ 43” n

41

MASSiNG ExplorAtioNSM

in order to fully inteGrate all the proGraMatiC requireMents with a response to the probleM stateMent, i beGan searChinG for a ConCept oriGi-nated by the spaCe and funCtion of not just the built Conditions, but also of the spaCe in bet-ween. by GeneratinG an understandinG of lands-Cape as a CoMbination of huMan, physiCal and abstraCt eleMents inCludinG the built environ-Ment, this projeCt seeks to re-habilitate the se-vered ConneCtions of this CoMMunity as a neiGh-borhood and as a part of the City by enCouraGinG vertiCal interaCtion of all the aspeCts of this Mixed use developMent. the CoMbination of this understandinG and the use of the idea of a park as a Metaphor for a plaCe where “faMilies” CoMe toGether and share a CoMMon spaCe. this ConCept then starts to be perCeived as an iMaGe where the landsCape (buildinGs) and park (aCtivities) beGin to forM a syMbiotiC relationship where a neiGh-borhood CoMMunity flourishes.

42

proGrAM rEqUirEMENtSppaarkinG

Marina

residential

retail

offiCe

43

SitE plANS

offiCE CoMplExo

44

riVErfroNt ACCESS

r

45

offiCE CoMplExo

ACtiVitiESA

rESiDENtiAlr

46

pUBliC plAzAp

47

+

+

+

2_2 liViNG UNitl

liViNG_iNDoorS

l

4_3 liViNG UNitl

l1

l1

l2

l2

48

lEVEl 10 12 14 16 18

l

250’

274’

298’

322’

346’

VErtiCAl NEiGHBorHoD

N

49

design teamMario rodriGueZ

jonathan brannonluCiano espositodiMitar diMitrov

facultystanley russell

Mark weston

50

team florida_flex house

solar decathlon proposal spri

ng 2

010

sa+cd51

trANSportt DEploYMENtD StorAGES

propoSAl DiAGrAMS

p

52

parasol:shadinG- a parasol-like struCture will shade the roof, walls and Courtyard. water ColleCtion- the parasol will feed rainwater to a water feature and Cistern for site irriGation. the pv array and solar therMal panels- are supported by the parasol fraMework for flexibility and easy MaintenanCe without touChinG the buildinG envelope.

ventilation: slidinG Glass panels on the north and south walls allow the envelope to open up to the Courtyard for natural ventilation, durinG Mild Months, or Close down for MeChaniCal CoolinG du-rinG hot huMid Months. hiGh CeilinGs allow warMer air to rise and a solar ChiMney with operable vents induCes ventilation.

StorAGE

propoSAl loGol

53

propoSAl MoDEl

p

tampa, fla. (apr. 30, 2010)

the university of south florida is part of a teaM seleCted to partiCipate in the u.s. departMent of enerGy solar deCathlon whiCh will be held on the national Mall in washinGton, d.C. in the fall of 2011. teaMMates inClude florida state university, the university of Central florida and the univer-sity of florida under the banner “teaM florida.”

54

TEAM FLORIDA

www.flExHoUSE.orG/

p

55

56

mega-terme_revised

design development summ

er 2

010

sa+cd57

SCHEMAtiCSSGroUND lEVEl

1SECoND lEVEl

2

owner: j&a llC.

parCel id: 0856-15-0001

address: MediCal blvd enGlewood, fl. 34223

leGal desCription: CoM at se Cor of seC 32-40-20

land area: 1,407,796 sf.site area: 413,275 sf.

ZoninG Code:pud planned unit developMent Modr Moderate density residential

storM surGe: 6-8 ft.

winds: 96-110 Mph.

oCCupanCy ClassifiCation: institutional

ConstruCtion type: type ii b

buildinG area: 1st level 14,790 sf. 2nd level 13,120 sf.

buildinG heiGht: 28 ft above grade 2 stories

separation froM property lines: n-170 ft. s-708 ft. w- 89 ft. e-51 ft.

58

wAll SECtioN

S

59

CoNStrUCtioN SEqUENCE

C

foUNDAtioNS1

SHEAr wAllS2

StEEl frAME3

StEEl DECKS4

60

2

3 4 56

7

3

1211

10

9

8

roof composition

1. steel tube fraMe2. fasCia Cover3. steel anGle4. roofinG deCk 5. vapor barrier6. riGid sloped insulation7. wood bloCkinG8. sinGle ply roofinG MeMbrane9. CounterflashinG10. Metal CopinG11. Continious Cleat12. 3” pre-Cast ConCrete panel

StrUCtUrES

foUNDAtioNS

SHEAr wAllS

StEEl frAME

StEEl DECKS

61

firE SUpprESioNf

plUMBiNGp

ElECtriCE

MECHANiCAlM

62

6

5

4

3

2

1

iNtErior DEtAil

i

1. 2x8 sealed Cedar 2. 1” steel anGle welded to plate 3. 1/4” steel platet4. 3/8” threaded rod5. Metal deCk6. ConCrete floor above7. struCture beyond

firE SUpprESioN

plUMBiNG

ElECtriC

MECHANiCAl

63

64

miami house_beyond d2

revit summ

er 2

010

sa+cd65

SCHEMAtiC DrAwiNG propoSAl

D

06/21/10 B

My Main foCus for this projeCt was to

learn how to Manipulate and Modify revit’s

GeneriC Materials and CoMponents into

unique eleMents of desiGn whiCh Carry on

froM earlier sCheMatiC staGes

66

SElEC rEVit proDUCED SHEEtS

r

07/21/10E

67

06/21/10

B

07/21/10E

06/27/10

06/30/10 07/05/10

68

07/11/10 07/14/10

69

All-rEVit rENDEriNG

r

CorNEr1

oriGiNAl propoSAlp

70

UppEr DECK3

CAfE

2

71

d e s i g n

a d v a n c e d

portfolio

d e s i g n

a d v a n c e d

portfolio