Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) Experiment
Will WindesIdaho National LaboratoryART Graphite R&D Technical Lead
GCR Review MeetingIdaho National Laboratory14-16 July, 2020
This work was performed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC under contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.
Also would like to thank Mr. W. David Swank, Mr. David Rohrbaugh, and Dr. Tim Burchell for providing data and results within their research activities for this presentation.
Acknowledgements
2
Outline
Outline• Brief description of AGC
Original AGC Experiment objectives New (2018) high dose plans
• Experiment status AGC-4 and HDG-1 status
• Analysis of AGC results Initial 600°C data (AGC-1 & -2 data) New 800°C data (AGC-3) creep data
• What do you do with this data? Where does the data fit in? What will commercial vendors still need
to do? ASME qualification (briefly)
• Conclusions
Graphite R&D Program
Defines the safe working envelope for nuclear graphite
and protection of fuel
Behavior models- Predicts irradiated
material properties and potential degradation issues
- Irradiation behavior for continued safe operation
Mechanisms and Analysis- Data analysis and interpretation- Understanding the damage mechanisms
is key to interpreting data
Irradiation- Determines irradiation
changes to material properties- Irradiation behavior for
continued safe operation
As-Manufactured Properties- (Statistically) Establishes as-received
material properties- Baseline data used to determine irradiation
material properties
Licensing & Code- Establishes an ASME
approved code (for 1st time)- Develops property values for
initial components and irradiation induced changes
Five different research areas
• Irradiated material property changes (including creep) Six major grades, all properties needed for qualification (including creep rate), irradiation behavior
• VHTR conditions (1000°C outlet, 7 dpa dose) HTR conditions (<800°C outlet, 15 dpa dose)
Turnaround dose is critical for nearly all material properties
• However, we do lose temperature dependence 5
The AGC Experiment
New HDG capsules AGC-2 samples loaded into HDG-1 HDG-1 capsule assembled 600°C & 15 dpa (total)
HDG-1 ready for irradiation in ATR Sample loading order for HDG-2
From AGC-3 & AGC-4 specimens 800°C & 15 dpa (total)
Completed initial 600°C and 800°C irradiation AGC-1 and AGC-2 (600°C, 7 dpa) AGC-3 and AGC-4 (800°C, 8 dpa)
Completed initial PIE AGC-1 and AGC-2 (600°C, 7 dpa) AGC-3 (800°C, 8 dpa) - AGC-4 in 2021/2022
Re-irradiate select samples AGC-1 / AGC-2 HDG-1 AGC-3 / AGC-4 HDG-2
Status of AGC Irradiation
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16ε,
σ, ρ
, α, E
, CTE
Dose, dpa
Data from AGC Experiment
How AGC data is reported (each capsule) Characterization plan Pre-IE data package As-Run Irradiation report Data qualification report Disassembly report PIE data package Irr. creep analysis report Irr. material property analysis report
• All reports are publicly released All in OSTI database
• All reports contained within NDMAS Incorporated in NDMAS Portal
• Data linked to specific reports • Reports needed to understand data in
database AGC data on NDMAS portal after Baseline
data incorporated
W.E. Windes, T.D. Burchell, M. Davenport, “The Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Graphite R&D Program”, Nuclear Engineering Design, 362 (2020), NED 110586, ISSN 0029-5493
William E. Windes David T. Rohrbaugh W. David Swank, "AGC-3 Irradiation Creep Strain Data Analysis", INL/EXT-19-54725, July 2019
William E. Windes, David T. Rohrbaugh, W. David Swank,"AGC-3 Irradiated Material Properties Analysis", INL/EXT-20-58029, April 2020
Dimensional change and irradiation creep
• Critical data to determine lifetime of core components Required to determine the internal stress build-up inside
components• Creep relieves this stress!
Required to determine structural integrity• Information needed for ASME graphite code• Compared to the mechanical strength of component
• Critical for determining core performance Gaps change between core components
• Coolant by-pass increases• Core thermal conductivity changes
Restraints, keys, control rod insertion
• Determining turnaround dose is key Turnaround dose is key to understanding all pertinent material
property changes Point where microstructure catches up to atomic irradiation
damage
Let’s look at some AGC data (1/2)
8
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ΔL/L
Dose, dpa
Dimensional Change and Creep (600°C)
600°C
600°C
Effects of temperature on dimensional change & creep response
• Temperature affects both dimensional change and creep rate Higher temperatures yield shorter turnaround dose
(not shown here). But higher temperatures also yield higher creep rates
• Higher rate of stress relief
• Implies significantly different approach to core design for different temperatures Higher temperatures usually means shorter
component lifetime • Lower turnaround dose
• BUT : Lower stress buildup within component• Component gaps grow faster• Core efficiency degrades faster
Lower temperatures slow everything down• Higher turnaround dose – but larger internal stress• Less stress relief from creep
9
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8ΔL
/LDose, dpa
Temperature effects on dimensional change (600°C & 800°C)
600°C 600°C
800°C 800°C
Let’s look at some AGC data (2/2)
All vendors must establish turnaround dose for their graphite grade
Turnaround dose – critical parameter
10
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dim
ensi
onal
Cha
nge,
% (Δ
V/V)
Dose, dpa
Dimensional change vs. neutron dose
PCEA (750C) PCEA (950C)
IG-110 (750C) IG-110 (950C)
• Why do we care? Point where irradiation induced material
property changes begin to reverse. Point where microstructural densification
stops. Microcracking begins.
• Think of “before” and “after” turnaround Behavior is much more predictable for all
graphite grades before turnaround• Much less predictable (more data scatter)
after turnaround Crack propagation retarded in compressive
stress fields. Crack propagation accelerated in tensile
• Turnaround dose changes significantly with temperature IG-110 (50µm) 10 dpa to 5 dpa PCEA (1800µm) 11 dpa to 6 dpa
From: M.C.R. Heijna, S. de Groot, J.A. Vreeling, "Comparison of irradiation behaviour of HTR graphite grades", Journal of Nuclear Materials 492 (2017) 148e156
11
Other material properties of interest (1/2)
Density
Electrical Resistivity
Modulus
Shear
Mechanical changes
• Densification reduces crack propagation Directly related to dimensional change Only property to gradually change as a function
of increased dose
• Electrical resistivity is a good measure of isotropy within crystal structure Anisotropic behavior should be avoided Anisotropy increases more after turnaround
• Young’s and Shear Modulus important to determining component structural integrity and creep rate Immediate increase due to irradiation damage
pinning dislocation movement Gradual rise with increasing dose indicates
microstructural effects
Thermal changes
• Thermal expansion is important to structural integrity, thermal performance, and core assemblies Thermal induced stresses across large components Gaps between components will change
• Physical damage from contact• Coolant by-pass issues
Stability of stacked components in core assemblies
• Thermal diffusivity needed for heat removal from fuel, core performance, and component structural integrity Increases thermal induced stresses from temperature increase Decay heat removal issues with lower diffusivity Only property to exhibit immediate and significant decrease Initial decrease occurs at << 0.1 dpa
• Then only small decrease with increasing dose Conductivity (K = 𝛼𝛼 � 𝜌𝜌 � 𝐶𝐶𝑝𝑝 ) is related to density which changes with dose
12
Other material properties of interest (2/2)
CTE
Thermal Diffusivity
Irradiation induced changes must be considered in design
• Significant changes occur during normal operation in: Dimensional change
• Turnaround dose is key parameter• Highly temperature dependent
Density• After Turnaround density decreases (volumetric expansion)• Formation of microcracks
Strength and modulus• Graphite gets stronger with irradiation …• Until Turnaround dose is achieved, it then decreases
Thermal conductivity• Decreases almost immediately to ~30% of unirradiated values
Coefficient of thermal expansion• Initial increase but then reduces before Turnaround• CTE is why properties are so temperature dependent
• Significant changes do not typically occur in the following properties: Oxidation rate, neutron moderation, specific heat capacity, emissivity, heat capacity 13
Irradiation Effects on Graphite Properties
Dimensional Change
Strength & Modulus
CTE
Thermal Diffusivity
Graphite R&D Program
Defines the safe working envelope for nuclear graphite
and protection of fuel
Behavior models- Predicts irradiated
material properties and potential degradation issues
- Irradiation behavior for continued safe operation
Mechanisms and Analysis- Data analysis and interpretation- Understanding the damage mechanisms
is key to interpreting data
Irradiation- Determines irradiation
changes to material properties- Irradiation behavior for
continued safe operation
As-Manufactured Properties- (Statistically) Establishes as-received
material properties- Baseline data used to determine irradiation
material properties
Licensing & Code- Establishes an ASME
approved code (for 1st time)- Develops property values for
initial components and irradiation induced changes
Five different research areas
Behavior models- Predicts irradiated material properties and potential degradation issues- Irradiation behavior for continued safe operation
Mechanisms and Analysis- Data analysis and interpretation- Understanding mechanisms is key to interpreting data
Irradiation- Determines irradiation changes to material properties- Irradiation behavior for continued safe operation
As-Manufactured Properties- (Statistically) Establishes as-received material properties- Baseline data used to determine irradiation material properties
Licensing & Code- Establishes an ASME approved code (for 1st time)- Develops property values for initial components and irradiation induced changes
Qualification of graphite
Degradation- Oxidation or molten salt effects- Abrasion, erosion, fatigue
Qualified
(Matthews)
(Geringer)
(R. Smith)
(Gallego)
(J. Bass)
• AGC irradiation program about 75% complete Only the high dose (HDG) capsules remaining Data from initial AGC capsules can be used for micro, small modular,
and prismatic designs right now
16
Conclusions
• Critical irradiation data Turnaround dose must be established Operating temperatures influence component qualification
• and core design considerations (lifetime, replacement, degradation) Designing beyond turnaround dose will be difficult and expensive (in
money and time) AGC data available through INL’s NDMAS database (soon)
• Qualifying specific graphite grades Use of ASME BPVC would be best As-fabricated material property testing is required May not need to get irradiated, oxidation, and molten salt data
• Depends upon Rx design and which graphite is chosen Must have expertise in graphite before license application