1
Advanced Methods
Chris Rorden– Advanced fMRI designs
Adaptation fMRI Sparse fMRI Resting State fMRI
– Advanced fMRI analysis ICA Effective and Functional Connectivity Analysis
– Alternative measures of activation Perfusion msMRI
– Comparing SPM to FSL
Some slides from Peter Bandettinifim.nimh.nih.gov/presentations
CABI talk 18 November 2009
2
Adaptation Designs (from Kanwisher)
Show two stimuli in rapid succession.
See if a brain region can discriminate if these stimuli are the same or different.
Classically, regions show adaptation – less time to process same information twice in a row.
a.ka. ‘repetition suppression’ paradigm.
3
Adaptation Designs
FFA activates strongly to faces Does it discriminate – yes: we see adaptation
response. Similar adaptation is not seen for chairs, so
suggests special role in face processing.
4
Sparse fMRI
Standard fMRI acquires data continuously.– Loud noises can make it difficult to examine auditory
stimuli.
Sparse imaging includes a delay between each fMRI volume, so stimuli can be presented while scanner is silent.
Time (sec)0 10
Continuous
Time (sec)0 10
Sparse
5
Sparse fMRI
Typically, sparse design like a block design – each acquisition measures effect of single stimuli.
Stimuli must be presented ~5sec prior to acquisition. Sparse designs have less power than continuous
designs, and it is difficult to estimate latency of BOLD response.
Due to T1 effects, Sparse designs can still have good power.
Time (sec)0 10
BO
LD
6
Resting State fMRI
Resting state fMRI allows us to estimate natural connectivity between regions: which regions cycle together.
Essentially, have individual lie in scanner resting while you collect a lot of fMRI data.
Must covary out low frequency scanner drift as well as high frequency physiological noise.
7
Resting State Correlations
Rest: seed voxel in motor cortex
B. Biswal et al., MRM, 34:537 (1995)
Activation: hand movement
8
Independent Component Analysis
In conventional analysis, we see if a HRF predicts our behavioral design.
FSL includes MELODIC for ICA, includes nice description:– www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/research/melodic/
In ICA, we decompose fMRI data into different spatial and temporal components.– estimate the BOLD response.– estimate artifacts in the data, then run conventional analysis on
denoised data.– find areas of ‘activation’ which respond in a non-standard way.– analyse data for which no model of the BOLD response is available
(e.g. resting state fMRI).
9
ICA vs Conventional Analysis
Conventional analysis is confirmatory: does my model predict data.
Results depend on model
ICA is exploratory: Is there anything interesting in the data?
Can give unexpected results.
What is the potential of ICA?FSL includes melodic, so you can examine our
data.Many use melodic to remove artifacts.
10
Connectivity
Classic fMRI detects all regions involved with task– Motor task would elicit motor
cortex, cerebellum and supplementary motor area.
– It would be much more insightful if we could see the direction of connections
Examples include Dynamic Causal Modelling
11
Psycho-physiological Interaction (from Henson)
Parametric, factorial design, in which one factor is psychological (eg attention)
...and other is physiological (viz. activity extracted from a brain region of interest)
AttentionAttention
V1V1
V5V5
SPM{Z}SPM{Z}
attention
no attention
V1 activityV1 activity
V5
acti
vity
timetime
V1
acti
vity
Attentional modulation of
V1 - V5 contribution
12
Effective vs Functional Connectivity (Henson)
No connection between B and C,yet B and C correlated because of
common input from A, eg:A = V1 fMRI time-seriesB = 0.5 * A + e1C = 0.3 * A + e2
Correlations:
A B CA 1B 0.49 1C 0.30 0.12 1
A
B
C
0.49
0.31
-0.02
2=0.5, ns.Functional Functional
connectivityconnectivity
Effective connectivityEffective connectivity
13
SPM2 Dynamic Causal Modelling (Henson)
V1 IFG
V5
SPC
Motion
Photic
Attention
.82(100%)
.42(100%)
.37(90%)
.69 (100%).47
(100%)
.65 (100%)
.52 (98%)
.56(99%)
Friston et al. (2003)
Büchel & Friston (1997)
EffectsEffects
Photic – dots vs fixationPhotic – dots vs fixationMotion – moving vs staticMotion – moving vs staticAttenton – detect changesAttenton – detect changes
• Attention modulates the backward-Attention modulates the backward-connections IFGconnections IFG→SPC and →SPC and SPC→V5SPC→V5
• The intrinsic connection V1→V5 is The intrinsic connection V1→V5 is insignificant in the absence of motioninsignificant in the absence of motion
14
Functional Connectivity
Observe which region’s activity correlates.Can be done while resting in scanner
– Hampson et al., Hum. Brain. Map., 2002
15
Perfusion imaging
Use Gd or blood as contrast agent. Allows us to measure perfusion
– Static images can detect stenosis and aneurysms (MRA)
– Dynamic images can measure perfusion (PWI) Measure latency – acute latency appears to be strong
predictor of functional deficits. Measure volume Can also measure task-related changes in blood flow
(ASL), similar to fMRI.
16
ASL
MR signal is based proportion of atoms aligned with the magnet.
Slightly lower energy state aligned, so atoms preferentially align.
More alignment in higher fields
However, 180° pulse will reduce this signal.
=
3T Net Magnetization
=
3T NM after 180° pulse
17
Arterial Spin Labeling
1. Tag inflowing arterial blood2. Acquire Tagged image3. Repeat scan without tag4. Acquire Control image5. Subtract Control image – Tagged
image
The difference in magnetization between tagged and control images is proportionalto regional cerebral blood flow
http://www.umich.edu/~fmri/asl.html
1
2
3
4
18
Data from Trio
We collect 16 slices 3.5x3.5x6mm
TR 2.2sec (4.4sec for tag+control pair).
TE=12ms (very little BOLD artifact).
Not wise to collect ASL faster than 2sec (otherwise, not enough transit time between volumes. Wise to use slower TR for individuals with impaired perfusion (stroke).
Control
Tagged
Difference
Mean of 73 differences
19
TI and TR influence contrast
time
TI (Inversion Time)
TR (Repeat Time) TR (Repeat Time)
TI must be long enough for tagged blood to wash in to tagged sliceTR must be long enough to allow tagged blood to wash out of control slice
20
TR
Optimal TR depends on the individual’s blood transit time.– ~2.4s, the ‘tagged’ image has more tagged blood than the control image.– ~1.8s, very low contrast: tagged blood in both control and tagged image.– ~1.2s reverse contrast: tagged blood does not reach slice until the control image
(except fast arteries).
21
Blood Transit Time
BTT varies in individuals If the TR is very short, the blood will
not yet reach the capillary beds. Therefore, the control image can
appear darker than the tagged image! In particular, very little signal when
BTT matches TR. Transit time actually faster during
active than rest. Either calculate BTT for each
individual MRM, 57, 661-669 or use a long TR (4s, e.g. 8 s for control+tag pair)
22
Theory: Signal in ASL
Tagged image: Inflowing inverted spins within the blood reducing tissue magnetization: more flow = darker
Control: Inflowing blood has increased magnetization than saturated tissue: more flow = brighter
Mumford et al. (2006)
ControlTagged
ControlTagged
Acquisition
Perfusion Signal
Observation
23
BOLD and Perfusion
ASL scans are designed to measure perfusion
However, because they are T2* scans, they also have a BOLD artifact.
To minimize BOLD, keep TE to a minimum
BOLD is present in BOTH tagged and control image
Because the tagged and control images are acquired several seconds apart, simple subtraction of tagged and control image is not a good idea for event related designs.
24
Analysis Strategies
Simple subtraction– Subtract tagged image from subsequent control image– Halves the amount of samples (e.g. with 3sec TR, one sample
every 6sec).– Problem: leading edge and falling edge of HRF will have very
different signal in control and tagged image: poor choice for event-related designs.
25
Analysis Strategies
Inter-trial subtraction– Subtract tagged image from control image acquired at the same
interval after task onset.– Halves the amount of samples (e.g. with 3sec TR, one sample
every 6sec).– Problem: events must be ordered to coincide with TRs (e.g. period
of on-off blocks is an odd number of TRs).
26
Analysis Strategies
FSL interpolates controlled and tagged images to estimate signal for both control and tagged images.
The number of volumes is not halved,– analysis proceeds similar to fMRI data. Samples not completely independent, so DF is adjusted. The FSL difference signal is actually added to a mean image for all samples, so
that the relative signal-noise is similar to fMRI
27
Analysis
Easy to analyze ASL data with FSL:– Select perfusion check box– FSL simply subtract tagged image from neighboring control
FSL is not optimal– Control and tagged image are not acquired simultaneously– Therefore, they sample different points of HRF.– There are alternatives
Sinc interpolate to estimate simultaneous signals (interp_asl) Intertrial subtraction: compare control image with tagged image that was
collected at same delay after event (Yang et al, 2000). Add both tagged and control images in a single model (Mumford et al,
2006).
– In general, FSL approach only good for block designs.
28
Measuring the initial dip
0 6 12 18 24
2
1
0
Time (seconds)
‘Initial dip’ than signal increase seen 5 sec later.– No venous artefacts– Later overcompensation may not
be specific (‘watering a garden for the sake of a thirsty flower’).
Very small signal– Difficult to realize benefit if you
can’t achieve good spatial resolution.
– Remains controversial – best parameters unknown.
29
Higher spatial resolution
Contrast to noise ratio dependent on volume of hydrogen:
– Standard T2* 3x3x3mm = 27mm3– 1.5*1.5x2mm = 4.5mm3= 17% of SNR
However, for small structures or edges, higher resolution reduces partial volume effects.
– Therefore, higher resolution can improve % signal change observed
For ideas on optimal voxelsize, see www.pubmed.com/17101280
30
Arterial Spin Labelling
Benefits:– Direct measure of blood flow– Less drift: Better for assessment
of very slow (>1min) changes.– Data whiter (less dominated by
low frequency noise)– Signal more from tissue than
veins.– Less spatial distortion than
BOLD (BOLD requires long TE without spin-echo)
– Perhaps better statistical power for group analysis (calibrated measure has less variability).
Disadvantages– Requires two images:
tagged and subtraction, therefore TR is twice as long.
– Less statistical power for individual (fewer samples)
– Can not collect many slices: can only see portion of brain, normalization difficult (hurts group statistics)
31
Super high resolution
Venous effects decrease with field strength (e.g. at 1.5T, capillary/venous ratio much smaller than at 7T).
Higher SNR with 7T can allow very high resolution imaging: – Example ocular dominance columns for left and
right eye projection to visual cortex.– 0.5x0.5x3mm (0.75mm3)– www.pubmed.com/17702606
Spin-echo sequences (HSE T2) can be used as well as traditional GE T2* at these field strengths to detect BOLD.
32
Neural current MRI (Bandettini)
In theory, MRI phase maps should show the direct neural firing as detected by MEG. Intracellular
Current
Magnetic Field
Surface Field Distribution Across Spatial Scales
33
magnetic source/neural current MRI
fMRI BOLD is very indirect measure.Can we directly measure brain activity?Neural firing influences magnetic field (e.g. MEG).Is this effect big enough to measure?
Very controversial.Most designs do not remove BOLD
confoundRecent work not encouraging
www.pubmed.com/19539040
Image
Phasemap