Date post: | 21-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nathan-knight |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 1 times |
AEGON Asset Management
Olaf van den HeuvelHead of Tactical Asset Allocation
CFA Forecasting dinner
2
Enough already
Financial innovation Emerging Markets
Stability
3
Enough already II
Historic analysis tells us growth is negatively impacted if debt/GDP exceeds 230%
Growth and debt for 18 OECD countries
Source: BIS
4
Enough already III
It is contagious!
1980 2010United States 46 97Japan 53 213Germany 31 77France 34 97Greece 26 132Netherlands 65 76Portugal 36 107Spain 27 72
Government debt as percentage GDP
2010268456241321262327366356
Total debt (government, household and corporations)
as percentage GDP
Source: BIS
5
Austerity
6
10 Years + of the Euro: benefits and imbalances
What happened and did not happen
EMU created one of the largest economic areas
Reduced transaction costs
Increased intra-EMU trade
Resulted in low inflation
Reduced interest rates / interest rate differentials
Resulted in further integration of financial markets
Resulted in economic convergence
Disciplined national budgetary policies
Resulting in:
Increased economic growth throughout the eurozone ... McKinsey calculates EMU effects on GDP at ~0.3%pt p.a. for the
eurozone (over period 1999 – 2010)
Germany strongly profited from an increase in competitiveness
Peripherals strongly profited from lower interest rates
... but also a build-up of economic imbalances Productivity differentials
Government finances where not sufficiently redressed
Low interest rates contributed to increase in household deficits and
housing market bubbles
7
The issue
8
Fiscal, economic and political union
Fiscal union
Eurobonds
Budget rules and “Marshall plan” for peripherals
“United States of Europe”
Sustainability and required integration
Agreement has been reached on tighter budget rules► “The proof of the pudding is in the eating”
More will probably be needed► Ad hoc conditional crisis loans have been provided, but
not a systemic solution (ie eurobonds, EU IMF)► Marshall plan for peripherals► Fiscal union
Insufficient integration (too little, to late) increases likelihood of core eurozone scenario
Degree of integration
Sustainability / Market credibility
High
High
Core Eurozone
Enforceable budget rules
Present Eurozone
9
Cyclical outlook
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
jul-0
7
nov-
07
mrt
-08
jul-0
8
nov-
08
mrt
-09
jul-0
9
nov-
09
mrt
-10
jul-1
0
nov-
10
mrt
-11
jul-1
1
nov-
11
Leading indicators
Eurozone PMI
Germany PMI
Italian PMI
US PMI
Source: Bloomberg, Datastream
10
Economic outlook
GDP US Euro zone UK Japan2012 2.0 0.7 1.1 1.22013 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.22014 1.8 1.1 1.7 1.62015 2.7 1.7 2.1 1.9
Inflation US Euro zone UK Japan2012 2.4 1.8 3 -0.52013 2.8 1.7 2.9 -0.42014 2.7 1.6 2.9 -0.32015 2.7 1.6 2.9 -0.3
11
Low growth for longer
Not necessarily bad for markets
12
Valuation good predictor of long term equity returns
13
Dividend yield and positive effect of rerating of equities cause a higher expected return in Europe compared to the US
Components of equity returns
14
Expected returns
Annualized returns until 2015
Basecase EU AAA Sovereign -1%
Italian Sovereign 5%US Sovereign -1%
Inflation Linked Bonds (EU) 0%EU Investment Grade 3%
EU High Yield 7%US Investment grade 1%
US High Yield 3%EMD 4%
Lev loans 5%ABS 8%
Equity - WORLD 7%Equity - US 5%Equity - EU 9%
Equity - EMERGING MARKETS 8%Real estate - WORLD 9%
Commodities 3%
1515
Discuss!
16
High level indication of main (potential) costs and benefits
Scenario Costs Benefits
Fiscal Union flight forward
(60%)
Funding rescue mechanism (larger than present ESFS) Debt restructurings to restore sustainability Fiscal transfers Negative impact on economic growth from tough austerity packages Loss of sovereignty
Exchange rate stability continues Potential as political and economic powerhouse survives Institutional changes plus forced restructuring of pressured
countries improves stability and long term growth outlook Avoids costs of break-up of Eurozone
Core Eurozone economic
convergence is leading (30%)
Loss of exchange rate stability and return to competitive devaluations, with negative growth impact and deflationary risks for Core Eurozone and inflationary risks and higher interest rates for exiting/devaluating countries
Increase in euro-denominated debt burden for exiting countries, triggering defaults including systemically important banks
Membership of Core Eurozone driven by high degree of economic convergence and therefore less need for rescue mechanisms and fiscal transfers
Pressured countries restore competitiveness through devaluations
Break-up Eurozone,
survival EU large step back (9%)
Further loss of exchange rate stability Larger growth, inflation and interest rate risks Wealth effects from redenomination of all debts and assets, triggering
defaults including systemically important banks
Monetary policies can be better aligned to domestic circumstances
Break-up EU chaos (1%)
As above, plus negative growth impact from break down of cooperation, harmonisation and integration and increase in isolation and protectionism
Complete loss of Europe as (potential) political and economic powerhouse
Maximum sovereignty
High
Small