WORKSHOP 3 / TYÖPAJA 3 Date and time: 8.10.2019, 12:30-16 Place: Bothnian Business House (kokoustila Kaari) , Pakkahuoneen katu 1, Tornio AGENDA 12:30 – 12:35 Welcome – Sampo Kangastalo (Town of Tornio) and Juanjo Galan & Kirsi Hutri-Weintraub (Aalto University) 12:35 – 12:40 Presentation of participants 12:40 – 12:55 Results of the workshop2 – Juanjo Galan (Aalto yliopisto) 12:55 – 13:10 Towards a Climate-KIC Demonstrator and a LACAP (Landscape Adaptation plan to Climate Change ?– Juanjo Galan (Aalto U.) • What can be a LACAP? Examples of other Strategic Plans (Partners & Roles / Topic & Goals / Phases / Schedule / Outputs) • Key contents of an application for a Climate-KIC Demonstrator: Table of Contents & Key ideas; possible ways to contribute 13:10 – 13:30 Key findings and opportunities of the AELCLIC project (see reports from Workshop 1 and 2) in relation to the City Plans of Tornio & Haparanda + Suggestions for a future LACAP and Demonstrator– Sampo Kangastalo (Town of Tornio) 13:30 – 15:45 Teamwork at one table + Coffee (n. 20 min/tehtävä) • TASK1: WHAT: Main Values, Key Goals & Themes/Topics (+ some IMPACTS & SOLUTIONS/ACTIONS) for a potential LACAP • TASK2: Structure of a potential LACAP • TASK2: HOW: Process, Key phases and schedule (e.g. identification and involvement of key stakeholders, analysis and diagnosis of critical issues, development of strategies & plan, definition of pilot actions…) • TASK3: WHO: Partners: Possible distribution of roles, duties, contributions, etc. • TASK5: Critical diagnosis of the existing Local Network and its capacity to promote the development of a Demonstrator application and a LACAP (administrative, financial, social, scientific) • TASK6: Celebrating the end of the AELCLIC_pathfinder in the Tornio River Valley 12:15 – 12:30 SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS AELCLIC_PATHFINDER project TORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019) NAME OF CONTACT INSTITUTION TYPE Sampo Kangastalo Tornio City REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATION Aapo Mäenpää Tornio City REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATION Sofia Rosendahl Haparanda City REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATION Robert Ekholm Haparanda City REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATION Niina Karjalainen ELY-centre REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATION Minna Heljala The Museum of Tornio Valley PUBLIC BODY Teija Yli-Martimo The Museum of Tornio Valley PUBLIC BODY Virve Sallisalmi Transboundary river commission PUBLIC BODY Katri Hendriksson Lapland’s University of applied sciences RESEARCH Anne-Mari Söderström MTK ECONOMY SECTOR Martti Isto Farmer ECONOMY SECTOR Pekka Pelttari Fishers/Tornio City ECONOMY SECTOR
Transcript
WORKSHOP 3 / TYÖPAJA 3Date and time: 8.10.2019, 12:30-16 Place: Bothnian Business House (kokoustila Kaari) , Pakkahuoneen katu 1, Tornio
AGENDA
12:30 – 12:35 Welcome – Sampo Kangastalo (Town of Tornio) and Juanjo Galan & Kirsi Hutri-Weintraub (Aalto University)
12:35 – 12:40 Presentation of participants
12:40 – 12:55 Results of the workshop2 – Juanjo Galan (Aalto yliopisto)
12:55 – 13:10 Towards a Climate-KIC Demonstrator and a LACAP (Landscape Adaptation plan to Climate Change ?– Juanjo Galan (Aalto U.)
• What can be a LACAP? Examples of other Strategic Plans (Partners & Roles / Topic & Goals / Phases / Schedule / Outputs)
• Key contents of an application for a Climate-KIC Demonstrator: Table of Contents & Key ideas; possible ways to contribute
13:10 – 13:30 Key findings and opportunities of the AELCLIC project (see reports from Workshop 1 and 2) in relation to the City Plans of Tornio & Haparanda + Suggestions for a future LACAP and Demonstrator– Sampo Kangastalo (Town of Tornio)
13:30 – 15:45 Teamwork at one table + Coffee (n. 20 min/tehtävä)
• TASK1: WHAT: Main Values, Key Goals & Themes/Topics (+ some IMPACTS & SOLUTIONS/ACTIONS) for a potential LACAP
• TASK2: Structure of a potential LACAP
• TASK2: HOW: Process, Key phases and schedule (e.g. identification and involvement of key stakeholders, analysis and diagnosis of critical issues, development of strategies & plan, definition of pilot actions…)
• TASK3: WHO: Partners: Possible distribution of roles, duties, contributions, etc.
• TASK5: Critical diagnosis of the existing Local Network and its capacity to promote the development of a Demonstrator application and a LACAP (administrative, financial, social, scientific)
• TASK6: Celebrating the end of the AELCLIC_pathfinder in the Tornio River Valley
12:15 – 12:30 SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
NAME OF CONTACT INSTITUTION TYPE
Sampo Kangastalo Tornio City
REGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Aapo Mäenpää Tornio City
REGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Sofia Rosendahl Haparanda City
REGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Robert Ekholm Haparanda City
REGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Niina Karjalainen ELY-centre
REGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Minna Heljala
The Museum of Tornio
Valley PUBLIC BODY
Teija Yli-Martimo
The Museum of Tornio
Valley PUBLIC BODY
Virve Sallisalmi
Transboundary river
commission PUBLIC BODY
Katri Hendriksson
Lapland’s University of
applied sciences RESEARCH
Anne-Mari
Söderström MTK ECONOMY SECTOR
Martti Isto Farmer ECONOMY SECTOR
Pekka Pelttari Fishers/Tornio City ECONOMY SECTOR
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
Results of WORKSHOP2
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
PARTICIPANTS (22 + 2)
• Markku Vaaraniemi / Fisher, Pro Siika
• Tero Mustonen / IPCC
• Kaisu Mustonen / Snowchange co-op
• Virve Sallisalmi / Transboundary river comission
• Göran Wigren / Haaparanta Cityi
• Bertil Segerlund / Haaparanta
• Sanna Tyni / Lapland’s school for applied sciencies
• Stina Almkvist /Region Norrbotten
• Jarmo Lokio / Tornio City
• Aapo Mäenpää / Tornio City
• Markus Kannala / Tornio City
• Risto Koskinen /YLE, Kemi
• Jouni Valikainen / Lounais-Lappi
• Hanna Lakkala / Finland Future Research Center, University of Turku
• Pekka Pelttari / Fisher, Tornioriver
• Birgitta Tamminen / Provincia Bothniensis, Tornio Haparanda
• Katariina Huikari / Tornio City, Team Botnia Oy
• Anne Anttila / Outokaira tuottamahan ry / Leader
• Minna Heljala / Museum of Tornio river valley
• Anne-Mari Söderström / MTK-Tornio (representative of local farmers)
• Teija Ylimartimo / Museum of Tornio river valley
• Sampo Kangastalo/ Tornio City
• Juanjo Galan /Aalto University
• Kirsi Hutri-Weintraub / Aalto University
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
CO-DEFINITION OF KEY-TOPICS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN THE MALMI COMMUNITY?
Join selection of FOUR broad key topics:
TOPIC 1: Nature and biodiversity
TOPIC 2: Sustainable economy
TOPIC 3: Cultural environment, people and ways of living (life in the north)
TOPIC 4: Water systems, floods and Tornio river
TOPIC
TEAM
1
Culture environment, living in
the north
Tornioriver (river + water)
TEAM
2
Trans boundary co-operation
Sustainable trades
TEAM
3
Preserving of the biodiversity
of northern nature
People and ways of living
TEAM
4
Floods
Land use planning
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
Interestingly, SUSTAINABILITY and TRANSBOUNDARY CO-OPERATION were understood as the overarching goal and
overarching way of working for future actions and for addressing the proposed topics.
CO-IDENTIFICATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS
1) IMPACTS1.1. SEASONAL CHANGES, SNOW, SOILS AND RIVER• Decline in seasons?• Run-off and impact in water quality• Reduction of snow cower and effect in permanent frost (routa) / no permanent frost • No more distinct seasons• Season of the snow cover may shorten and the river may stay unfrozen even in the winter1.2. ECOLOGY AND ECOSYSTEMS• Arctic species are receding• Distribution areas of plants will change - a negative thing• Impoverishment of nature?• Forest growth accelerates1.3. ALIEN SPECIES, DISEASES AND PESTS• Alien species, diseases, pests1.4. FISHES• Survival of salmonids1.5. REINDEERS• Reindeer food, pasture of lichens
TOPIC 1: NATURE AND BIODIVERSITY
2) OPPORTUNITIES2.1 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY:• The growing season is getting longer• New crops• Forest growth is accelerating2.2 RESTORATION OF RIVER BASIN AND RURAL OPENESS• restoration of the river basin• Rural openness will be restored2.3 NEW CLIMATE AND REDISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES• Birds, fauna• Distribution areas of plants will change - a
positive thing
ECOLOGY & ECOSYSTEMS
SEASONAL CHANGES, SNOW, SOILS AND RIVER
ALIEN SPECIES, DISEASES AND PESTS
AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY
NEW CLIMATE AND REDISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES
RESTORATION OF RIVER BASIN AND RURAL OPENESS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
FISHES
REINDEERS
CO-IDENTIFICATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS
1) IMPACTS1.1. AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY• More flexibility in farming (changes in crop varieties or harvest season depending on weather
conditions)• Pests / attacks • Agriculture and forestry benefit?• Forestry - pests, storms, soft, wet forestland and roads, harvest/cutting time shortens• The difference between the seasons (no clear differences between the seasons). This will affect
northern Finland, there is going to be warmer summers and winters, also the soil and its vegetation and organisms will also change. This may allow, for example, the cultivation of novel plants in the area, but may also mean increasing pests.
1.2. INFRASTRUCTURES & SAFETY• Damage to infrastructure / costs• The need for deepening the sea-lane is diminished due to rising sea levels• Carbon sinks• Winter will delay, affects also to tourism as trade• More floods and more often big/wide floods1.3. BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION:• Built places/buildings to high places• Construction becomes more difficult on the riverside• The need for maintenance of buildings and infrastructure - humidity, wind• Regulations of construction become tighter1.4. FISHING• Effects to fishing• Fish does not rise (to river) / The condition of the salmons, the warm water - the negative thing• Winters are no longer as before, plants change, the river warms up and is no longer suitable for
salmon1.5. TOURISM• Fishing tourism?• Winter will delay, affects also to tourism as trade
TOPIC 2: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY
2) OPPORTUNITIES2.1. TOURISM• ”Cooling” tourism• Summer travel >> incomes2.2. GREEN ECONOMY• Green trades, ”new” business and existing ones• Agriculture increases >> open landscape
AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY
FISHING
BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION
GREEN ECONOMY
INFRASTRUCTURES & SAFETY
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
TOURISM
TOURISM
DOUBTS: TIME SCALE AND SPEED OF CHANGE
CO-IDENTIFICATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS
1) IMPACTS1.1. LANDSCAPE CHANGES: RIVER, FARMING, ROADS, BUILDINGS• Change of landscape• Construction techniques • Built places/buildings to high places• Roads• Farming• Wood construction, birds, fauna• Season of the snow cover may shorten and the river may stay unfrozen even in the winter1.2. WAYS OF LIVING, TOURISM AND WARMER SUMMERS• Change in fish species: tourism, diet, hobby• Summer travel >> more flying• Summer travel >> sufficient infrastructure• Different weather phenomena can be seen in daily life - walking, living, dressing• The ski season becomes shorter – a horrible idea1.3. HEALTH & SAFETY• Floods• Diseases and pests• The fight against slipperiness is increasing• Snow season shortens - The amount of light does not increase - mental nausea1.4. PEOPLE & SOCIO-CULTURAL STRUCTURE • Immigration?• Languages and dialects as nature information (meä-language, Saami)• Climate refugees >> multicultural environment• Climate refugees1.5 DOUBTS: TIME SCALE AND SPEED OF CHANGE• What is the time scale?• Absurd decisions• Speed of Change cp. Adaptation - conflict?• Changes have also occurred in Finland due to climate change.
TOPIC 3: CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT, PEOPLE AND WAYS OF LIVING (LIFE IN THE NORTH)
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
WAYS OF LIVING, TOURISM AND WARMER SUMMERS
LANDSCAPE CHANGES: RIVER, FARMING, ROADS, BUILDINGS
PEOPLE & SOCIO-CULTURAL STRUCTURE
SUMMER TOURISM
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
HEALTH & SAFETY PEOPLE & SOCIO-CULTURAL STRUCTURE
CO-IDENTIFICATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS
1) IMPACTS1.1. FLOODS AND DAMAGES• Erosion of the river banks• The peaks of the floods are rising, becomes more extreme• The predictability of floods will decline as extreme events increase• Beach construction becomes more difficult• More floods and more often big/wide floods• In addition to the spring and midsummer floods, also autumn flood in the future• The water level varies1.2. WATER QUALITY, QUANTITY & DROUGHTS• Nutrient runoff >> water quality• Water supply, drinking water, clean water• Regional drought• Nutrient runoff > water quality?1.3. RIVER ECOSYSTEMS & FISHING• Water temperature rises >> e.g. ice formation• Fishing (negative)• Biodiversity is changing • Alien species,: positive/negative1.4. INFRASTRUCTURES• Existing infrastructure• Water and wastewater management
TOPIC 4: WATER SYSTEMS, FLOODS AND TORNIO RIVER
2) OPPORTUNITIES2.1 LESS ICE FLOODS & MORE FLOOD CONTROL• Ice floods (jääpatotulvat) are decreasing• Only once a year a real flood?• Flood control2.2. HYDROPOWER AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES• Floating constructions• Power – flood power station• New innovations and technologies2.3. RIVER ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHING• Alien species,: positive/negative• Fishing (positive) 2.4. RECREATION• The bathing season becomes longer2.5 NUTRIENTS AND SOIL FERTILITY• Increase in nutrient content of the river valley (fertility)
FLOODS AND DAMAGESWATER QUALITY, QUANTITY &
DROUGHTSINFRASTRUCTURES
LESS ICE FLOODS & MORE FLOOD CONTROL
RIVER ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHING
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
RIVER ECOSYSTEMS & FISHING
HYDROPOWER AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES
RECREATION NUTRIENTS AND SOIL FERTILITY
CO-DESIGN OF CLIMATE CHANGE TRANSITIONS (FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS AND IN RESPONSE TO THE IDENTIFIED BARRIERS/OPPORTUNITIES)?
TOPIC 1: NATURE AND BIODIVERSITY
SOLUTIONS:• SELECTION OF CROPS, TECHNIQUES
AND MACHINES• SUPLEMENTARY FEEDING FOR
REINDEERS• SEAL HUNTING• CONTROL OF ALIEN SPECIES
BARRIERS:• REGULATIONS /RESTRICTIONS FOR
FISHING• SMALL FARMS• LACK OF RESOURCES
IMPACTS: OPPORTUNITIES
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
IMPACT OPPORTUNITY SOLUTION BARRIERReindeer food, pasture of lichens_____________________Survival of salmonids_____________________Decline in seasons?_____________________Reduction of snow cower -permanent frost (routa) / no permanent frost
_____________________Run-off water quality_____________________Aliens species, diseases, pestsArctic species are receding
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________Forest growth is acceleratingThe growing season is getting longerNew cropsRural openness will be restored_____________________
CONTROL METHODS• AGRICULTURE NEEDS INFORMATION ON NEW
CROPS AND THEIR POSSIBILITIES (CROP/HECTARE) + EU REGULATION TO BE MORE FLEXIBLE IN ORDER TO MAKE CHANGES POSSIBLE DURING THE HARVEST SEASON
BARRIERS:• LACK OF RESOURCES, FOR
EXAMPLE FINANCING• EU DIRECTIVES
IMPACTS: OPPORTUNITIES
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
IMPACT OPPORTUNITY SOLUTION BARRIEREffects to fishingFishing tourism?
______________________
______________________Pests / attacks More flexibility in farming (changes in crop varieties or harvest season depending on weather conditions)
______________________Damage to infrastructure / costsLack of the permanent frost
(routa) changes the structure of the clayey soil problems?Immigration?What is the time scale (of
planning/thoughts)
____________________Green trades, ”new” business and existing ones”Cooling” tourism____________________
___________________
ResearchAim to reduce emissions of substances hazardous to the environment Reduce nutrient runoff: lands, swamps, forests, agriculture ditches, technology _________________________________
_________________________________Environmental friendly biological control methodsAgriculture needs information on new crops and their possibilities (crop/hectare) + EU regulation to be more flexible in order to make changes possible during the harvest season ________________________________
Lack of resources, for example financing
_________________
_________________EU directives
_________________
CO-DESIGN OF CLIMATE CHANGE TRANSITIONS (FOR THE SELECTED TOPICS AND IN RESPONSE TO THE IDENTIFIED BARRIERS/OPPORTUNITIES)?
TOPIC 3: CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT, PEOPLE AND WAYS OF LIVING (LIFE IN THE NORTH)
SOLUTIONS:• FLOOD WALLS• BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL• ARTIFICIAL SPAWNING PLACES• ELIMINATION OF ALIEN SPECIES• PROVISION: STRATEGY, MORE
EUROPEAN CO-OPERATION , OPENNESS• TRAVELLING OVER LAND• DEVELOPMENT OF TRAIN SERVICES
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
IMPACT OPPORTUNITY SOLUTION BARRIER
Change of landscapeConstructionBuilt places/buildings to high places_____________________RoadsFloods_____________________FarmingDiseases and pests_____________________Change in fish species: tourism, diet, hobby_____________________Wood constructionBirdsFauna____________________Climate refugees multicultural environmentLanguages and dialects as nature information (meä-language, Saami)_____________________Summer travel more flyingSummer travel sufficient infrastructure
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________BirdsFauna
______________________Climate refugees population growth Climate refugees multicultural environment
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_RESULTS_WORKSHOP2 (Tornio, 30.8.2019)
IMPACT OPPORTUNITY SOLUTION BARRIERWater temperature rises e.g. ice formationFishing (negative)
______________________Biodiversity is changingFishing (positive) Nutrient runoff water quality______________________
Erosion of the river banksThe predictability of floods will decrease as extreme events increaseThe peaks of the floods are rising, becomes more extreme______________________Water supply, drinking water, clean water______________________Regional drought______________________Building/construction to the riverside becomes more difficultExisting infrastructure
The bathing season is coming longerIce floods (jääpatotulvat) are decreasing______________________Alien species,: positive/negativeIncrease in nutrient content of the river valley (fertility)______________________A real flood only once a year?
______________________
____________________
_____________________Floating constructionPower – flood power station New innovations and technologies
Development of (tourism) trade
_____________________Development od environmental programsDevelopment of agriculture
_____________________Protection of river sides Flood control
______________________Water and waste water management_____________________Storm water control/delay_____________________New innovations and technologies
_____________________MoneyPolitics
_____________________Reactions peed
_____________________Money
_____________________
_____________________NormsSlowness
Summary of the AELCLIC project in Finland 8.10.2019
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
WP2_NORTHERN EUROPE(Aalto University)
WORKSHOP1 (3,5 HOURS): CREATING LOCAL NETWORKS + DEFINING WORK-PLANS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
WORKSHOP1 (3,5 HOURS): CREATING LOCAL NETWORKS + DEFINING WORK-PLANS
NAME OF
CONTACT INSTITUTION SECTOR
Antti Mentula City of Helsinki (Urban
Environment Division)
LOCAL/REGIONAL
ADMINISTRATION
Satu TarulaCity of Helsinki (Urban
Environment Division)
LOCAL/REGIONAL
ADMINISTRATION
Laura YrjänäCity of Helsinki (Urban
Environment Division)
LOCAL/REGIONAL
ADMINISTRATION
Tiia NaskaliThe Finnish Association of
Landscape Industries ECONOMY SECTOR
Miimu
Airaksinen
Finnish Association for
Civil Engineers, RILECONOMY SECTOR
Sirpa
Lamminluoto
Malmi Nova shopping
centreECONOMY SECTOR
Joel
Huotilainen
REDITO Property
Investor, MalmintoriECONOMY SECTOR
Merja
Carlander
Helsingin yrittäjät,
Pohjois-Helsinki ry /
Entrepreneurs of Helsinki
ECONOMY SECTOR
Maria Laurila Malmi association SOCIETAL GROUP
Andrea
Botero Ninho kulttuurikeskus ry SOCIETAL GROUP
Joonas Viita neighbour SOCIETAL GROUP
Sari
Möttönenneighbour SOCIETAL GROUP
Hanna
Maidell neighbour SOCIETAL GROUP
PARTICIPANT INSTITUTION SECTOR
Linda Leinonen Kauhajoki townLOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Harri Virtanen Kauhajoki townLOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Marketta
NummijärviELY/South-Bothia, Seinäjoki
LOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Leena
Rinkineva-
Kantola
ELY/South-BothniaLOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Juhani
HallasmaaELY/South-Bothnia
LOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Timo LaksoRegional Council of South
Ostrobothnia
LOCAL/REGIONAL
AUTHORITY
Niina Tuovinen
Suupohjan
peruspalveluliikelaitoskuntay
htymä
PUBLIC SECTOR
Anna Tall Seinäjoen kaupunki/AMK RESEARCH
Sulevi
RiukulehtoRuralia-instituutti RESEARCH
Riikka Asunmaa Pro Agria ECONOMY SECTOR
Asko Ojala Hyyppä village societySOCIETAL ORGANIZATION +
FARMERS
Mikko Rotola-
Pukkila
Hyyppä valley conservation
board
SOCIETAL ORGANIZATION +
FARMERS
NAME OF
CONTACT INSTITUTION SECTOR
Sampo Kangastalo Tornio CityREGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Anu Rautiala Tornio CityREGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Aapo Mäenpää Tornio CityREGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Göran Wigren Haparanda CityREGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Tiina Elo Lapin LiittoREGIONAL/LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION
Riikka PyykköThe Museum of Tornio
ValleyPUBLIC BODY
Virve SallisalmiTranboundary river
comissionPUBLIC BODY
Marika SaranneLapin
ammattikorkeakouluRESEARCH
Anne-Mari
SöderströmMTK ECONOMY SECTOR
Petri Leinonen Farmer ECONOMY SECTOR
Martti Isto Farmer ECONOMY SECTOR
Markku
VaaraniemiFishers ECONOMY SECTOR
MALMI DISTRICT (13+2 PARTICIPANTS)_urban HYYPPÄ RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_rural + protected TORNIO RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_natural-rural
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
WORKSHOP1 (3,5 HOURS): CREATING LOCAL NETWORKS + DEFINING WORK-PLANS
WHAT ARE THE MAIN VALUES OF THIS PILOT LANDSCAPE?
WHAT IS IMPORTANT IN THIS PILOT LANDSCAPE FOR YOU OR FOR THE SECTOR/COMMUNITY YOU ARE REPRESENTING
WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE?
MALMI DISTRICT (13+2 PARTICIPANTS)_urban HYYPPÄ RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_rural + protected TORNIO RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_natural-rural
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
WORKSHOP1 (3,5 HOURS): CREATING LOCAL NETWORKS + DEFINING WORK-PLANS
MALMI DISTRICT (13+2 PARTICIPANTS)_urban HYYPPÄ RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_rural + protected TORNIO RIVER VALLEY (12+2 PARTICIPANTS)_natural-rural
HOW CAN CLIMATE CHANGE AFFECT THIS PILOT LANDSCAPE AND YOUR DAILY LIFE?
HOW DO YOU THINK THAT THE AELCLIC PROJECT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE EXISTING PLANS FOR THIS PILOT LANDSCAPE?
Asko Ojala Farmer, Hyyppä village societyPRIVATE SECTOR / SOCIETAL
ORGANIZATION
Mikko Rotola-Pukkila
Farmer, Hyyppä valley conservation board
PRIVATE SECTOR / SOCIETAL ORGANIZATION
Matti Seppälä farmer - coming to workshopPRIVATE SECTOR / SOCIETAL
ORGANIZATION
Jussi Parviainen Metsänhoitoyhdistys LAKEUS PRIVATE SECTOR
Laura Koivumäki Geopark PRIVATE SECTOR
Yrjö Ojaniemi MTK PRIVATE SECTOR
Riikka Asunmaa Pro Agria PRIVATE SECTOR
Erkki Vihonen Pro Agria PRIVATE SECTOR
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
TASK 1 / TEHTÄVÄ 1, 10 min + 10 min.: Co-definition of key-topics for the Pilot Landscape
MULTI-STAKEHODER GROUP1
TASK 3 / TEHTÄVÄ 3, 45 min + 15 min :CO-DESIGN of Climate Change Transitions (for the selectedtopics and in response to the identified impacts and opportunities
TASK 2 / TEHTÄVÄ 2, 15 min + 15 min:Co-identification of Climate Change impacts and opportunities for the selected topics
MALMI DISTRICT (12+2 PARTICIPANTS) HYYPPÄ RIVER VALLEY (14+2 PARTICIPANTS) TORNIO RIVER VALLEY (20+2 PARTICIPANTS)
TOPIC 3: SMART MOBILITY AND LOCAL ECONOMY TOPIC 3: ENERGY, PEOPLE & WAYS OF LIVING
TOPIC 4: NEW ECONOMIES? INDUSTRY AND SERVICE SECTOR
TOPIC 3: CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT & WAYS OF LIVING
TOPIC 4: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY
WORKSHOP3 (3,5 HOURS): RE-DEFINING KEY CONTENTS OF A FUTURE LACAP + DECIDING NEXT STEPS
1. RESULTS OF THE WORKSHOP (+ short introduction to the AELCLIC project for the new stakeholders)
2. NEW INPUTS FOR THE WORKSHOP:
• Towards a Climate-KIC Demonstrator and a LACAP (Landscape Adaptation plan to Climate Change) + Structure of a prototypical STRATEGIC PLAN
• Key findings and opportunities of the AELCLIC project (see reports from Workshop 1 and 2) in relation to existing local plans + Suggestions for a future LACAP and Demonstrator
3. TEAMWORK (IN MULTISTAKEHOLDER TEAMS)
• TASK1: WHAT: Main Values, Key Goals & Themes/Topics (+ some IMPACTS & SOLUTIONS/ACTIONS) for a potential LACAP
• TASK2: Structure of a potential LACAP
• TASK3: HOW: Process, Key phases and schedule TASK3: WHO: Partners: Possible distribution of roles, duties, contributions, etc.
• TASK4: WHO: Critical diagnosis of the existing Local Network and its capacity to promote the development of a Demonstrator application and a LACAP (administrative, financial, social, scientific)
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 8.8.2019
WORKSHOP3 (3,5 HOURS): RE-DEFINING KEY CONTENTS OF A FUTURE LACAP + DECIDING NEXT STEPS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 8.8.2019
HYPPA RIVER VALLEY_workshop3_6.9.2019MALMI DISTRICT_workshop3_29.8.2019 TORNIO RIVER VALLEY_workshop3_8.10.2019
WORKSHOP3 (3,5 HOURS): RE-DEFINING KEY CONTENTS OF A FUTURE LACAP + DECIDING NEXT STEPS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 8.8.2019
HYPPA RIVER VALLEY_workshop3_6.9.2019MALMI DISTRICT_workshop3_29.8.2019 TORNIO RIVER VALLEY_workshop3_8.10.2019
DECISION: To incorporate the results of theAELCLIC project in the Malmi Visio.The City of Helsinki will consider the possibiityof leading a further funding application
LEAD INSTITUTION: City of Helsinki
DECISION: To study potential fundingapplications to elaborate a LACAP or to advance in the developed works
LEAD INSTITUTION: TOWN of KAUHAJOKI
COORDINATION & MANAGEMENT (WP1)Management Group (MG) : all the partners of the projectAdvisory Board (AB): all the third parties
MG_x: Regular On-line meeting of the MG
WG_x: Workshop meeting (face to face) of the MG
AG_x: Milestone On-line meeting of the MG + AB
15th FEBRUARY Kick-off 15 MARCH 15 APRIL 15 MAY 15 JUNE 15 JULY 15 AUGUST 15 SEPTEMBER 15 OCTOBER 15 NOVEMBER 15 DECEMBER END
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT (WP1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
PO_x Partial OUTPUT in LEADING PILOT / in MULTIPLIER PLOT
PD_x Partial DELIVERABLE in LEADING PILOT/ in MULTIPLIER PILOT
FO_y Final OUTPUT
FD_y Final DELIVERABLE
Partial outputs/deliverables:
(X = 1): Consortium and Working Plan for each Pilot Landscape
(X = 2): Draft Structure and Implementation Plan for a LACAP (per Consortium & Pilot)
(X= 3): Final Structure and Implementation Plan for a LACAP (per Consortium & Pilot)
Final outputs/deliverables:
(Y = 1): Compilation of Final Partial Outputs / Deliverables
(Y = 2): New outputs and deliverables produced after the joint and critical analysis of the final results in each Pilot Landscape
(Y = 3): Guidelines for the constitutions of regional/local Consortiums
NOTE_ All the deliverables will be displayed in the web and disseminated by the partners
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Sub-Phase 2.1 Sub-Phase 2.2 Sub-Phase 2.3 2.1
PREPARATION CREATION OF REGIONAL/LOCAL CONSORTIA AND CO-DEFINITION OF STRUCTURE, METHODS AND RESOURCES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A LACAP FINAL OUTPUTS & REPORTING
IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN EACH PILOT AREA + DEFINITION OF WORKING PLAN
JOINT WORK OF EACH LOCAL GROUP: DEFINITION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, GOALS, AGENDAS, STRUCTURE & RESOURCES FOR A LACAP
REGIONAL/LOCAL OUTPUTS & AGREEMENTS
WG_1WORKSHOP
”HOW TO WORK WITH
THE REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA?”
AG_1ACTIVATION
MEETING
AG_2PRESENTATION OF
THE REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA AND
THEIR WORKING
PLANS
AG_3INITIAL OUTPUTS OF THE
WORK PRODUCED BY EACH
REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA
WG_2WORKSHOP
”STARTING the
CO_IDENTIFICATION OF
CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS
& OPPORTUNITIES:
Methods”
WG_3WORKSHOP
”NEW SUMMATIVE
OUTPUTS ON THE BASE
OF REGIONAL/LOCAL
OUTPUTS”
AG_4PRESENTATION AND
DISCUSSION OF PRE-FINAL
OUTPUTS AND REPORTS
MG_1 MG_2 MG_3 MG_4 MG_5 MG_6 MG_7
PREPARATION FINAL OUTPUTS & REPORTINGIDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN EACH
PILOT AREA + DEFINITION OF WORKING PLANper REGION (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
JOINT WORK OF EACH REGIONAL/LOCAL GROUP: GOALS, AGENDAS, STRUCTURE, RESOURCES FOR A POTENTIAL LACAP
per REGION (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
REGIONAL/LOCAL OUTPUTS & AGREEMENTS
per (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
WP1: web + channels
By the responsible of WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, BU2, BU3, BU4, BU5:-Self organization of each team.-Limits of each pilot landscape- Pre-identification of stakeholders for each regional /local consortia
Compilation of Final Partial Outputs / Deliverables New outputs and deliverables produced after the joint and critical analysis of the final results Guidelines for the constitutions of regional/local ConsortiumsClimate-KIC REPORTS
LEADING PILOT LANDSCAPE LEADING PILOT LANDSCAPE LEADING PILOT
MULTIPLIER PILOT LANDSCAPES MULTIPLIER PILOT LANDSCAPES MULTIPLIER PILOT
PO_1/PD_1
PO_1/PD_1
For each Pilot
PO_2/PD_2
PO_2/PD_2
For each Pilot
PO_3/PD_3
PO_3/PD_3
For each Pilot
FO_1 / FD_1
FO_2 / FD_2
FO_3 / FD_3
FD_4
FD_5
2.2.1 Climate Change:
DIAGNOSIS
2.2.2. Climate Change Adaptation:
AGREEING THE KEY ASPECTS FOR A LACAP
2.1.1. IDENTIFYING &
CONTACTING
2.1.2 AGREEING A
WORK PLAN
2.3. Proposal for a local
LACAP & AGREEMENTS
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3
xx
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_Implementation in Northern Europe by 6.9.2019
LOGIC MODEL_AELCLIC PATHFINDER_SCHEDULE FOR THE FINALIZATION OF OUTPUTS AND DELIVERABLES OUT1 CONSORTIUMS AND WORKING PLANS FOR EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE IN NORTHERN EUROPE
OUT2 CONSORTIUMS AND WORKING PLANS FOR EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE IN ATLANTIC AND ALPINE EUROPE
OUT3 CONSORTIUMS AND WORKING PLANS FOR EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE IN SOUTH-WESTERN EUROPE
OUT4 CONSORTIUMS AND WORKING PLANS FOR EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE
OUT5 DRAFT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT) IN NORTHERN EUROPE
OUT6 DRAFT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT) IN ATLANTIC AND ALPINE EUROPE
OUT7 DRAFT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT) IN SOUTH-WESTERN EUROPE
OUT8 DRAFT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT) IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE
OUT9 FINAL STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT LANDSCAPE) IN NORTHERN EUROPE
OUT10 FINAL STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT LANDSCAPE) IN ATLANTIC AND ALPINE EUROPE
OUT11 FINAL STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT LANDSCAPE) IN SOUTH-WESTERN EUROPE
OUT12 FINAL STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FUTURE LACAP (PER CONSORTIUM & PILOT LANDSCAPE) IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE
OUT13 COMPILATION OF FINAL PARTIAL OUTPUTS OUT1-OUT12
OUT14 NEW FINDINGS PRODUCED AFTER THE JOINT AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL RESULTS IN EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE AND IN THE WHOLE NETWORK
OUT15GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTITUTIONS OF REGIONAL/LOCAL CONSORTIUMS FOR THE DEFINITION OF LANDSCAPE-CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLANS
DEL1 EDITED AND IMPROVED COMPILATION OF PARTIAL OUTCOMES FROM THE DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES (OUT1, 2, 3 AND 4)
DEL2 EDITED AND IMPROVED COMPILATION OF PARTIAL OUTCOMES FROM THE DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES (OUT5, 6, 7 AND 8)
DEL3 EDITED AND IMPROVED COMPILATION OF PARTIAL OUTCOMES FROM THE DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES (OUT9, 10, 11 AND 12)
DEL4 EDITED AND IMPROVED COMPILATION OF FINAL PARTIAL DELIVERABLES (DEL1+DEL2+DEL3)
DEL5EDITED AND IMPROVED PRESENTATION OF THE NEW FINDINGS PRODUCED AFTER THE JOINT AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL RESULTS IN EACH PILOT LANDSCAPE AND IN THE WHOLE NETWORK
DEL6FINAL GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTITUTIONS OF REGIONAL/LOCAL CONSORTIUMS FOR THE DEFINITION OF LANDSCAPE-CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLANS
DEL9SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE OR CONFERENCE PAPER: IDENTIFYING AND ALIGNING AGENDAS FOR MULTI-STAKEHOLDER CONSORTIA ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION & MITIGATION
DEL10SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE OR CONFERENCE PAPER: SETTING MULTI-STAKEHOLDER CONSORTIA ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION & MITIGATION: MODELS FROM THE AELCLIC PROJECT
DEL11 SIGNED AGREEMENTS FOR A JOINT COMMITMENT OF PARTNERS IN THE ESTABLISHED LOCAL CONSORTIA
OUTPUTS AALTO UNIVERSITY
OUT2
OUT3
OUT4
OUT5
OUT6
OUT7
OUT8
OUT9
OUT10
OUT11
OUT12
OUT13
OUT14
OUT15
DEL9
DEL1
DEL2
DEL3
DEL4
DEL5
DEL6
DEL7
DEL8
DEL10
DEL11
OUT1
DELIVERABLES AALTO UNIVERSITY
OUTPUTS WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY
DELIVERABLES WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY
OUTPUTS POLYTECHNIC UNIV VALENCIA
DELIVERABLES POLYTECHNIC UNIV VALENCIA
OUTPUTS UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA
DELIVERABLES UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA
INPUTS FOR OUTPUTS AND DELIVERABLES
15th FEBRUARY Kick-off 15 MARCH 15 APRIL 15 MAY 15 JUNE 15 JULY 15 AUGUST 15 SEPTEMBER 15 OCTOBER 15 NOVEMBER 15 DECEMBER END
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Sub-Phase 2.1 Sub-Phase 2.2 Sub-Phase 2.3 2.1
PREPARATION CREATION OF REGIONAL/LOCAL CONSORTIA AND CO-DEFINITION OF STRUCTURE, METHODS AND RESOURCES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A LACAP FINAL OUTPUTS & REPORTING
IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN EACH PILOT AREA + DEFINITION OF WORKING PLAN
JOINT WORK OF EACH LOCAL GROUP: DEFINITION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, GOALS, AGENDAS, STRUCTURE & RESOURCES FOR A LACAP
REGIONAL/LOCAL OUTPUTS & AGREEMENTS
15th FEBRUARY Kick-off 15 MARCH 15 APRIL 15 MAY 15 JUNE 15 JULY 15 AUGUST 15 SEPTEMBER 15 OCTOBER 15 NOVEMBER 15 DECEMBER END
INITIAL CONSORTIUM AND WORKING PLAN
LOCAL IMPACTS AND DRAFT STRUCTURE OF A LACAP
FINAL STRUCTURE OF LACAP & FORMAL AGREEMENT
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER_in a Nutshell (situation 8.10.2019)
WORKSHOP1 ”Who” Local Network & Work-Plan
WORKSHOP2 ”What for” Co-identification of impacts and opportunities
WORKSHOP3 ”How” Co-definition of key contents for a LACAP
HYYPPÄJOKI VALLEY 26.4.2019 (REPORTED) 14.6.2019 (REPORTED) 6.9.2019
TORNIO RIVER VALLEY 24.5.2019 (REPORTED) 30.8.2019 8.10.2019
TØNDER MARSHLANDS
Lowland Peat and Polder Landscape of Holland
BERTRA DUNE SYSTEM 7.5.2019 (REPORTED) 1.10.2019
HAUTE TARENTAISE 8.10.2019 21.10.2019
MONT SAINT MICHEL
HUERTA DE VALENCIA 17.6.2019 REPORTED) 17-22.10 (to be confirmed)
RIVER BESÒS (METROPOLITAN AREA OF BARCELONA)
2.10.2019 29-31.10 (to be confirmed)
SERRES D´ANCOSA 8.10.2019 1st week of November (to be confirmed)
PARC NATURAL ALT PIRINEU 4.10.2019 1st week of November (to be confirmed)
PARQUE NATURAL LAGUNAS DE LA MATA Y TORREVIEJA?
25.9.2019 23.10.2019
URBAN FRINGE CITY OF BOLOGNA 16.5.2019 (REPORTED) 18.9.2019 (REPORTED)
CITY OF MANTOVA 13.5.2019 (REPORTED) 16.7.2019 (REPORTED)
Carol Park and the Filaret-Rahovaneighborhood (Bucharest)
4.7.2019 (REPORTED)
ETNA LANDSCAPES 14.7.2109 (REPORTED)
Towards a Climate-KIC Demonstrator and a LACAP?
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
SOURCE: Center for Clean Air Policy
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION vs ADAPTATION
SOURCE: WWF
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
Mitigation – reducing climate change – involves reducing the flow of heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere,
either by reducing sources of these gases (for example, the burning of fossil fuels for electricity, heat or transport) or enhancing the “sinks” that accumulate and store these gases (such as the oceans, forests and soil). The goal of mitigation is to avoid significant human interference with the climate system, and “stabilize greenhouse gas levels in a timeframe sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner” (from the 2014 report on Mitigation of Climate Change from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, page 4).
Adaptation – adapting to life in a changing climate – involves adjusting to actual or expected future climate.The goal is to reduce our vulnerability to the harmful effects of climate change (like sea-level encroachment, more intense extreme weather events or food insecurity). It also encompasses making the most of any potential beneficial opportunities associated with climate change (for example, longer growing seasons or increased yields in some regions)….
Earth’s climate has been relatively stable for the past 12,000 years and this stability has been crucial for the development of our modern civilization and life as we know it. Modern life is tailored to the stable climate we have become accustomed to. As our climate changes, we will have to learn to adapt. The faster the climate changes, the harder it could be.
While climate change is a global issue, it is felt on a local scale. Cities and municipalities are therefore at the frontline of adaptation. They are working to build flood defenses, plan for heatwaves and higher temperatures, install water-permeable pavements to better deal with floods and stormwater and improve water storage and use.
According to the 2014 report on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (page 8) from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, governments at various) levels are also getting better at adaptation. Climate change is starting to be factored into a variety of development plans: how to manage the increasingly extreme disasters we are seeing and their associated risks, how to protect coastlines and deal with sea-level encroachment, how to best manage land and forests, how to deal with and plan for reduced water availability, how to develop resilient crop varieties and how to protect energy and public infrastructure.
SOURCE: NASA (https://climate.nasa.gov/solutions/adaptation-mitigation/
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION vs ADAPTATION AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
A set of scenarios referred to as Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) are in common use to study future climate change. RCPs are designed to provide plausible future scenarios of human emissions patterns. These include consideration of future greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, population growth and many other factors.
Based on best practices in the global science community, we usually presents 3 RCPs:
• RCP8.5: high global emission scenario. This scenario indicates global average warming levels of 3.2 to 5.4°C by 2090.
• RCP4.5: medium global emission scenario, includes measures to limit (mitigate) climate change. This scenario indicates global average warming levels of 1.7 to 3.2°C by 2090.
• RCP2.6: low emission global scenario, requires strong mitigation actions. This scenario indicates global average warming levels of 0.9 to 2.3°C by 2090
(source: Scenarios and climate models; Government of Canada)
Climate change scenarios or Socioeconomic scenarios are projections of future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions used byanalysts to assess future vulnerability to climate change
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
Climate change scenarios or Socioeconomic scenarios are projections of future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions used byanalysts to assess future vulnerability to climate change
Projected seasonal changes in heavy precipitation for the period 2071–2100 compared to
1971–2000 (in %) in the months December to February (DJF) and June to August (JJA) in
different scenarios or regional model simulations (Source: WGIIAR5-Chap23; Adapted from
Jacob et al., 2013.)
The climate projections summarized in the IPCC AR5 project that global temperature will increase by mid-
century (2046–2065 relative to 1986–2005) by 0.4–1.6 °C for the lowest available Representative Concentration
Pathway (RCP2.6), by 0.9–2.0 °C for the middle pathway (RCP4.5), by 0.8–1.8 °C for RCP6.0 and by 1.4–2.6 °C
for the highest emissions scenario (RCP8.5). (Source: European Environmental Agency)
CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS & HOW TO USE THEM AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION
The process was formalized as the Copenhagen Cloudburst Formula, a six-step procedure for integrating a Blue-Green Approach:
1.Data and Investigation:
2.Modeling and Mapping
3.Cost of Doing Nothing
4.Design and Qualify: Hotspots were identified, transferring strategic planning to human-scale. The “Cloudburst Toolkit” was developed as a palette of universally applicable, multi-functional, flexible elements.
5.Involvement and Iteration
6. Cloudburst Economics: A detailed socio-economic Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) tested two masterplan options
7. Application: Two masterplan variations were developed to assess potential advantages and disadvantages – Option 1 Conventional and Option 2 Blue-Green
Source: OPPLA 2019
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WORKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATIONWadden Sea Plan 2010
The Trilateral Wadden Sea Plan (WSP) is the common policy and management plan for the protection and sustainable management of the Wadden Sea Area• a. a natural ecosystem, its functions and characteristic biodiversity;• b. resilience to climate change and other impacts;• c. maintenance of the landscape and cultural heritage;• d. sustainable use as defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Habitats Directive;• e. public support for the protection of the Wadden Sea.
Climate change and enhanced sea level rise may seriously impact the structure, functions and characteristic biodiversity of the Wadden Sea ecosystem, as well as the safety of the inhabitants in the region.
The Trilateral Cooperation relating to the impacts of climate change started in 1998 with the establishment of the trilateral working group CPSL (Coastal Protection and Sea Level Rise). They have produced 3 reports:• Impacts of sea level rise on the Wadden Sea ecosystem (CPSL report 1, 2001), • Best practices to deal with enhanced sea level rise (CPSL II report, 2005)• Relevance of spatial planning for managing the impacts of climate change and the role of
sand nourishment for compensating sea level rise (CPSL III report, 2010).• In 2011, the work of the CPSL was continued by the Task Group Climate (TG-C). TG-C has
drafted astrategy on increasing the resilience of the Wadden Sea to the impacts of climate change,.
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
WHAT IS NEEDED IN A (CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION) PLAN?AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
Source: Climate Change Adaptation Strategy_City of Melbourne
GOALS AND COMMITMENTSANALYSIS AND DIAGNOSIS
WHAT IS NEEDED IN A (CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION) PLAN?AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
RESOURCES, PEOPLE AND SCHEDULE ACTIONS & PILOTS
Source: Tipperary Sustainable Energy Action Plan 2017-2020
WHAT IS NEEDED IN A (CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION) PLAN?AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
Source: The primary phases and subphases of climate adaptation. Adapted from Moser and Ekstrom (2010) Source: The Blackfeet Climate Change Adaptation Plan – Blackfeet Country and Climate Change
WHAT IS NEEDED IN A (CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION) PLAN?AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
NOTE_ All the deliverables will be displayed in the web and disseminated by the partners
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Sub-Phase 2.1 Sub-Phase 2.2 Sub-Phase 2.3 2.1
PREPARATION CREATION OF REGIONAL/LOCAL CONSORTIA AND CO-DEFINITION OF STRUCTURE, METHODS AND RESOURCES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A LACAP FINAL OUTPUTS & REPORTING
IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN EACH PILOT AREA + DEFINITION OF WORKING PLAN
JOINT WORK OF EACH LOCAL GROUP: DEFINITION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, GOALS, AGENDAS, STRUCTURE & RESOURCES FOR A LACAP
REGIONAL/LOCAL OUTPUTS & AGREEMENTS
WG_1WORKSHOP
”HOW TO WORK WITH
THE REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA?”
AG_1ACTIVATION
MEETING
AG_2PRESENTATION OF
THE REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA AND
THEIR WORKING
PLANS
AG_3INITIAL OUTPUTS OF THE
WORK PRODUCED BY EACH
REGIONAL/LOCAL
CONSORTIA
WG_2WORKSHOP
”STARTING the
CO_IDENTIFICATION OF
CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS
& OPPORTUNITIES:
Methods”
WG_3WORKSHOP
”NEW SUMMATIVE
OUTPUTS ON THE BASE
OF REGIONAL/LOCAL
OUTPUTS”
AG_4PRESENTATION AND
DISCUSSION OF PRE-FINAL
OUTPUTS AND REPORTS
MG_1 MG_2 MG_3 MG_4 MG_5 MG_6 MG_7
PREPARATION FINAL OUTPUTS & REPORTINGIDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN EACH
PILOT AREA + DEFINITION OF WORKING PLANper REGION (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
JOINT WORK OF EACH REGIONAL/LOCAL GROUP: GOALS, AGENDAS, STRUCTURE, RESOURCES FOR A POTENTIAL LACAP
per REGION (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
REGIONAL/LOCAL OUTPUTS & AGREEMENTS
per (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5)
WP1: web + channels
By the responsible of WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, BU2, BU3, BU4, BU5:-Self organization of each team.-Limits of each pilot landscape- Pre-identification of stakeholders for each regional /local consortia
Compilation of Final Partial Outputs / Deliverables New outputs and deliverables produced after the joint and critical analysis of the final results Guidelines for the constitutions of regional/local ConsortiumsClimate-KIC REPORTS
LEADING PILOT LANDSCAPE LEADING PILOT LANDSCAPE LEADING PILOT
MULTIPLIER PILOT LANDSCAPES MULTIPLIER PILOT LANDSCAPES MULTIPLIER PILOT
PO_1/PD_1
PO_1/PD_1
For each Pilot
PO_2/PD_2
PO_2/PD_2
For each Pilot
PO_3/PD_3
PO_3/PD_3
For each Pilot
FO_1 / FD_1
FO_2 / FD_2
FO_3 / FD_3
FD_4
FD_5
2.2.1 Climate Change:
DIAGNOSIS
2.2.2. Climate Change Adaptation:
AGREEING THE KEY ASPECTS FOR A LACAP
2.1.1. IDENTIFYING &
CONTACTING
2.1.2 AGREEING A
WORK PLAN
2.3. Proposal for a local
LACAP & AGREEMENTS
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3
xx
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
TOWARDS A CLIMATE-KIC DEMONSTRATOR?
WORKING
WITH 16
LOCAL
NETWORKS
JUNE
2018
KICK OFF
A1
A2
A3
A4
GOAL,
SITES,
GENERAL
PARTNERS
FINAL SITES +
SITE
PARTNERS +
DETAILED
GOALS +
METHODS
RESULT
Identified
GOALS, SITES,
METHODS, KEY
PARTNERS
AUGUST
2018
DECEMBER
2019
IMPLEMENTING THE DEMOSTRATOR
PROJECT:
1-3 YEARS UP TO 3 M €
DRAFTING A CLIMATE KIC
PATHFINDER
APPLICATION:Goal: IDENTIFY and INVOLVE
LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS IN
THE CO-DEFINITION OF
LOCAL AGENDAS FOR
CLIMATE CHANGE
ADAPTATION / MITIGATION IN
THE SET OF SELECTED
LANDSCAPES
RESULT
PATHFINDER
APPLICATION
RESULT:
CO-DEFINITION OF
LOCAL NETWORKS
AND BASIC
STRUCTURE OF
LANDSCAPE
ADAPTATION PLANS
(LACAPs)
…20XX
RESULT:
LANDSCAPE ADAPTATION PLANS FOR CLIMATE
CHANGE in a SET OF 8-10 EUROPEAN
LANDSCAPES
FINAL SITES +
SITE
PARTNERS +
DETAILED
GOALS +
METHODS
DRAFTING A CLIMATE KIC
DEMOSTRATOR
APPLICATION:Goal: CODEFINE A PROJECT
TO PRODUCE A SET OF
LANDSCAPES PLANS/CHARTS
FOR LANDSCAPE ADAPATION
/ MITIGATION
MARCH
2020
RESULT
DEMOSTRATOR
APPLICATION
50% external cofunding!
IMPLEMENTING THE
PATHFINDER PROJECT:
1 YEAR AND 100.000 €
- 50% SALARIES
- 50% ACTIVITIES AND
OTHER EXPENSES IN
THE SET OF SELECTED
LANDSCAPES
€
PRODUCING A SET
OF LACAPs
Ideation of
the PLAN
€
JANUARY
2019
Selection of Pilot Landscapes with
local networks with the administrative,
social and economic capacity to be engaged in the
definition of the LACAP if the funding
is granted
AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
TOWARDS A CLIMATE-KIC DEMONSTRATOR? AELCLIC PROJECT JJuanjo Galan (Aalto University)
1. PARTNERS & THIRD PARTIES (ROLES, CONTRIBUTIONS)2. PROJECT OVERVIEW
PROJECT TITLEPROJECT SUMMARYPUBLIC DESCRIPTIONWORKPLANROLE OF PARTNERS AND TEAM MEMBERSKEY OUTPUTSKEY DELIVERABLESRISK MANAGEMENT PLAN (RISKS AND SOLUTIONS)
3. PROJECT SPECIFICSGENERAL IMPACT CLIMATE IMPACT RESULTS AND DISSEMINATION GENDERADDED VALUE & VALUE FOR MONEY PREPARATION
4. BUDGET AND STRUCTURE (WORK PACKAGES)
Preparation of the application November 2019- March 2020
The AELCLIC Demonstrator would be a continuation of the AELCLIC pathfinder and would aim at the development of full LACAPs in those Pilot Landscapes where complete and committed Local Networks have been created.
Total Budget: 1-3 million euros to e distributed amongst the local networks
Key findings and opportunities of the AELCLIC project in
relation to the TORNIO STRATEGIC PLANS
AELCLIC_PATHFINDER projectTORNIO RIVER VALLEY_ Pilot Landscape_MATERIALS WORKSHOP3 (Tornio, 8.10.2019)
• Development director• Sampo Kangastalo
• City of Tornio
•
AELCLIC workshop 3
8.10.2019 / Tornio
Key question 1 1) A personal and critical revision of the results of the AELCLIC Workshops 1 and 2
in Tornio. Are we missing any critical points? How do the Towns of Tornio and Haparanda think that these results relate to their City Plans/Visions or Strategies and to other relevant planning documents (e.g. Tornio-HaparandaStrategy, Tornio Tourism Masterplan, etc)?.
• For the critical revision of the results of the workshops 1 and 2, please use the documents available in the Tornio section of the AELCLIC webpage: https://aelclicpathfinder.com/northern-europe
River and water ”main value” in Tornio River ValleyRiver Tornio dominant local nature element
Most important landscape: Cultural landscape environment - indicateslong history of Tornio River Valley, traditions, Tornio 400 year 2021…
Knowledge of climate change: Climate Changes Too big theme?
Climate change affects mostly to local economyInteresting that 1st was not ecology and ecosystems!!
AELCLIC project will give us learning and sharingNetworking and team work, academic research etc.
Workshop 2: 30.8.2019
22 + 2 participants
16 organisations + 2 private persons
Defining impacts, opportunities, solutions and barriers under four topics:1. Nature and biodiversity2. Sustainable economy3. Cultural environment, people and ways of living (life in the north)4. Water systems, floods and Tornio River
Key topics are relevant but there is a need for defining each content more(too big things to solve and analyze in 2 hours)
Crossborder co-operation is needed globally and locally – joint interestsfor example River Tornio
Key question 2• A short list of the:
(1) Goals
(2) Values
(3) Key topics and
(4) Key actions included in the City Plans/Visions or Strategies of Tornio and Haparanda and in other relevant planning documents (e.g. Tornio-Haparanda Strategy, Tornio Tourism Masterplan, etc). These actions, together with the goals, values, topics and actions proposed during the AELCLIC project, will activate the task 1 of the workshop3
City of Tornio – strategy documents according to strategy goals
TORNIO CITY STRATEGY 2017-20211. An attractive border
city2. Functional and renewing services
3. Happy and participating citizen
4. Functional City Concern
Business developmentprogram
Partnership agreementswith educational
institutions (3)
Communications and marketing plan
City plan of Tornio
Land policy program
Tourism masterplan
TornioHaparanda
Vision 2020
Digiagenda
(yearly)
Educational and childcare plans (several)
Welfare plan
Disability policyprogramme
Youth policy plan
Elder care policy plan
Integration plan
Ownership policy
Personnel program
Essential programmes and plansin Tornio
Tornio City Strategy 2017-2021
• Functionality means also sustainability!
Environment
Social / society
Culture
Economics
• Operational guidelines – how we work
• ”The City of Tornio works in accordance withthe principles of sustainable development”
•
Other strategies and goals, examples
Tornio Business Development Program: Circular Economy as a growthbranch
Tornio Tourism masterplan 2030: Sustainable tourism as an attraction / for example fishing and national parks
Tornio City plan 2021:
• No more buildings to flood risk areas
• Comprehensive green area network in whole municipality
• -> prevent storm waters, urban floods
• Renewable energy: for example windmill farm areas
Tornio Land Use policy: Denser urban structure, urbaneconomic survey/study of the growth areas in city of Tornio
TornioHaparanda Vision 2020: Sustainable environment – energyconsumption, increasing knowledge etc.
On going actions in Tornio / examples
AELCLIC –projectFlood protection project Dam raising project with City of Haparanda in Sweden
Circular Economy projects CeInCities City Centre as a CE and SC platform (On the border 2030) Resource Wise SeaLapland Private investments – partnerships between the city and companies Arctio business area / green technology area
Investigating possible networks and agreements for sustainableenvironment For example ”HINKU” –municipality network / Carbon neutral Finland
Investments Circular economy, wind mill farms…
What next
Need to analyse our city strategic goals from the point of view of globalwarming / sustainable development
Need to analyse our city plan and adaptate our land use planning
Scanning and selection of framework for future actions: HINKU, UN..??!!agreements, goals, measures, actions…
City Council workshop
Promoting sustainable energy projects (wind mill farms, gas economy)and circular economy projects (several)
-> ”Current state report / analyses” before future actions
Thank you TACK
Sampo KangastaloDevelopment directorCity of Tornio
![The Trove [multi]/1st... · PATHFINDER RPG CORE RULEBOOK , PATHFINDER RPG BESTI ARY , PATHFINDER RPG BESTIARY 2 , PATHFINDER RPG BESTIARY 3 , PATHFINDER RPG ADVANCED PLAYER S GUID](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/60c7beb87d66ea6048574996/the-trove-multi1st-pathfinder-rpg-core-rulebook-pathfinder-rpg-besti-ary.jpg)
