+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

Date post: 02-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: adebayor-dayo
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 28

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    1/28

    D R . W . L . A D E Y E M O ,

    B D S , F M C D S , F W A C S , P H D , F I C S

    A S S O C I A T E P R O F E S S O R / C O N S U L T A N T

    O R A L A N D M A X I L L O F A C I A L S U R G E O N

    U N I V E R S I T Y O F L A G O S / L U T H

    Aetiopathogenesis of facial

    clefts

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    2/28

    Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common

    abnormalities found in live births

    May account for up to 65% of all cogenitalanomalies in some series

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    3/28

    Pathogenesis

    The embryologic basis of cleft palate is failure of themesenchymal masses derived either from thee maxillaryprominences (i.e., the lateral palatine processes) or fromthe MNP (i.e., either the median palatine process or the

    nasal septum) to meet and fuse with each otherr.

    Cleft lip results from failure of the maxillaryprominence on the affected side to unite withmedial nasal prominence (unilateral)

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    4/28

    www.icareunit.com

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    5/28

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    6/28

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    7/28

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    8/28

    Common observations :

    Race incidence higher in orientals >whites >blacks

    20% have a family history

    Syndromic clefts in 1% to 8% First degree relatives are 25 times more likely to have a

    deformities than normal population

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    9/28

    There have been numerous reports on the possiblecauses of cleft lip and palate in the literature.

    These reports have been derived from

    epidemiological studies, animal studies, and humangenetic in vitro studies.

    Early studies suggested a multifactorial thresholdmodel for the aetiology of nonsyndromic cleft lip and

    palate.

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    10/28

    The possible mechanism of the interaction betweenenvironmental and genetic factors has beensuggested as follows: that genetic factors createsusceptibility for cleft, clefts develops whenenvironmental factors trigger the geneticallysusceptible phenotype.

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    11/28

    Genetic influences

    Reports have suggested that the proportion ofenvironmental and genetic factors varies with the sexof the affected individual, the severity of the cleft, thetype of cleft (whether Syndromic or no-Syndromic,cleft lip with or without palate or isolated cleftpalate, and unilateral and bilateral cleft.

    The duration and timing of the teratogens on the

    foetus also affects the severity of the anomaly

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    12/28

    Genes had been shown to play an important role infacial development that includes genes identified asgrowth factors, cytokines, self-signaling molecules,and structural proteins.

    Gene linkage and association studies have confirmedrole for a number of these genes.

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    13/28

    The application of increasing complex analyses suchas molecular markers; that incorporate the severityof the phenotype and the addition of environmental

    variables facilitate the detection of even small geneeffects and provide an increasing powerful platformfor the collection of genetic data

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    14/28

    Genetic influences

    Studies in genetic influences have beencontroversial on account of discrepancies insamples and models

    Small pedigree

    Low penetrance

    Genetic heterogenicity

    Varying influence of environmental factors All leading to different conclusions

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    15/28

    BIXEL CLASSIFICATION

    Syndromic variety; monogenic ,chromosomic orenvironmental( 1% of CL, 8% of CP)

    Familiar variety; 25% of CLP, 12% of isolated CP

    Sporadic or isolated; 75% of CLP and 80% 0fisolated CP

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    16/28

    Threshold concept of multifactorial inheritance

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    17/28

    CLEFT LIP AND PALATE LOCI

    CL/P loci Chromosomic

    location

    Year of

    identification

    OFC1 6p24-p23 1990

    OFC2 2p13 1989

    OFC3 19q13 1995

    OFC4 4q21-q31 1994

    OFC5/MSX1 4q16 1997

    OFC6/IRF6 1q32.3-q41 1992

    OFC7/PVRL1 1123.3 1998

    OFC8/TP73L 3q28 1999

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    18/28

    CL/P LOCI Chromosomic

    location

    Year of

    identification

    OFC9 13q33.1-q34 2002

    OFC10/SUMO1 2q33 2006

    MTHFR 1q36 1995

    TGFB3 14q24 1998

    RAR 17q21.1 1992

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    19/28

    Isolated Cleft palate loci

    2q32

    X49.0

    Concordance rate in monozygotic twins is 40%-60%, while for dizygotic twins is 5%

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    20/28

    Environmental influences

    Drugs (modified by genetics, timing and dosage )Phenytoin

    Thalidomide

    Vaproic acid

    BenzodiazepinesSteroids

    Amphetamines

    Maternal

    AgeAlcohol intake

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    21/28

    Dioxin

    Smoking

    Altitude

    Socioeconomic class Vitamin B deficiencies

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    22/28

    Table 4. Geneenvironment interactions in cleft lip andpalate

    TGFA/Smoking TGFA/Alcohol TGFA/Vitamins MSX1/Smoking

    MSX1/Alcohol TGFB3/Smoking TGFB3/Alcohol RARA/Smoking MTHFR/Vitamins P450/Smoking GST/Smoking EPHX1/Smoking

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    23/28

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    24/28

    The timing of these interactions are crucial,occurring between the 5-7 weeks in utero

    By the 12th week the processes are completed

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    25/28

    About 1/2 of children with some form of cleftinghave one or more associated anomalies

    Syndrome: A group of symptoms regularly occurring

    together and appear to have a related cause Over 250 known syndromes are associated with

    clefting

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    26/28

    Syndromic clefts

    Clefting is a secondary event(>157 syndromes) Trisomy 13

    Turners

    Downs

    Cri Du Chat Treacher Collins

    Pierre Robins

    Meckels

    Wolf Hirsclorn

    Van der Woude

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    27/28

    Implications

    Gene therapy

    Vitamin B supplements for at risk groups

    Prenatal counselling

    Folic acid supplements (?)

  • 7/27/2019 Aetiopathogenesis+of+Facial+Clefts

    28/28

    summary

    Orofacial clefts are a group of disorders of geneticorigin often unmasked by environmental influences.

    Environmental interactions in the aetiology of cleft

    is well documented.


Recommended