+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Date post: 28-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: prpc
View: 222 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
http://panhandlewater.org/2016-Planning-Docs/Ag%20mtg_5-31-12%20Power%20Point.pdf
Popular Tags:
19
Panhandle Water Planning Area Alternative Approaches Consideration of Legal Constraints in Demand Development
Transcript
Page 1: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Alternative Approaches

Consideration of Legal Constraints in Demand Development

Page 2: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Demands

MAG

Supply

MAG

Supply

with

buffer

Page 3: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point
Page 4: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

PANHANDLE APPROACH TO

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES

2011 Panhandle Area Regional Water Plan

Page 5: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Source Availability

� Ogallala Availability

� 40/50/80 Approach

� 2004 Northern GAM Model

� Calculated for each 1 sq mi grid

� Rita Blanca

� Included as part of Ogallala

� Dockum, Seymour, Blaine

� 1.25% decline in storage

� Reservoirs

� Safe Yields

Page 6: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Supply to WUGs / WWPs � Consider most limiting factor

� Geographical constraints

� Infrastructure

� Contracts

� Consider source

� Location

� Availability

� Quality

Page 7: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Comparison of Supply to Demand

Page 8: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Comparison of Supply to Demand

� 27 WUGs with Identified Shortages

� 454,726 Acre-Feet in 2010

� 487,957 Acre-Feet in 2030

� 419,780 Acre-Feet in 2030

� 99% attributed to Irrigation in 2010, 91% in 2060

� Limitations of availability in irrigation areas

Page 9: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

2009 InteraGAM

Differences in Available Supply from 2004 Dutton GAM

Page 10: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

COMPARISON OF MAGS, AVAILABLE

SUPPLIES AND IRRIGATION DEMANDS

2011 Panhandle Area Regional Water Plan

Page 11: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Irrigation Supplies

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

Dallam Hartley Sherman Moore

Groundwater Supplies, Year 2010

2004 Dutton GAM Intera GAM MAG

Irrigation Demand Irrigation Supply

Page 12: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Irrigation Supplies

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

Dallam Hartley Sherman Moore

Groundwater Supplies, Year 2060

2004 Dutton GAM 2009 Intera GAM MAG

Irrigation Demand Irrigation Supply

Page 13: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Discussion� Do we limit demands based on

supplies?

� No demand > MAG

� Do we modify approach to assigning irrigation supplies?

� Are there other demand considerations?

Page 14: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

METHODOLOGY FOR ASSIGNING

WATER SUPPLY

Agricultural Water User Groups

Page 15: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Supply to Ogallala WUGs

� Used GAM to assist with irrigation and municipal users

� Irrigation Users

� Lesser of GAM or demands

� Livestock Users

� Met demands

� Greater flexibility in moving to areas with water than irrigated agriculture

Page 16: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Irrigation Zones

Page 17: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Irrigation Supplies-Current Methodology

� Conservative Approach

� 1 mi2 grid – competition for water

� Limits supply in time and space

� 54 one-year simulations

� Water will flow to irrigation wells from outside grid area (how far?)

� May not correspond to GCD permitting

Page 18: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Irrigation Supplies-Current Methodology

� Captures intent of DFC

� Limits geographical extent of supply allocation

� Allows additional supply to be developed by others

� Protects other landowner rights

� Simply a plan

� No legal implications

Page 19: Ag%20mtg 5 31 12%20power%20point

Panhandle Water

Planning Area

Discussion� Do we modify approach to

assigning irrigation supplies?

� Continue to use GAM?

� Add a buffer?

� Modify temporal supplies (e.g., allow more use early in the planning period)?

� Do we modify approach to assigning livestock supplies?


Recommended