AGENDA
TIME
I.
METROPOLITAN BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION 2601 Bransford Avenue, Nashville, TN 37204
Regular Meeting – November 14, 2017 – 5:00 p.m. Anna Shepherd, Chair
CONVENE and ACTION
5:00 A. Establish Quorum
5:05
5:20 5:30
5:45
II. III. IV. V.
B. Pledge of Allegiance C. 30 Seconds in My District… AWARDS AND RECOGNTIONS - OUR PEOPLE A. T.J. Williams – Maplewood High School B. Latoya Cobb – Amqui Elementary School C. Melissa Knapp – Harpeth Valley Elementary School AND THE GOOD NEWS IS… - OUR STUDENTS A. Student Ambassadors Stratford STEM Magnet School
a. Charlie Utley - Academy of Science and Engineering b. Payton Simmons - Academy of National Safety and
Security Technologies B. H.G. Hill Middle School C. J.T. Moore Middle School PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - OUR COMMUNITY The Board will hear from those persons who have requested to appear at this Board meeting. In the interest of time, interest of time, speakers are requested to limit remarks to three minutes or less. Comments will be timed. A. Ahmed White – Smithson Craighead Academy B. John Raphael – Smithson Craighead Academy C. Mark Faulkner – Smithson Craighead Academy
GOVERNANCE ISSUES- OUR ORGANIZATION A. Actions
1. Consent a. Approval of Minutes – 9/26/17 and 10/17/ 2017 – Regular Meetings
b. Recommended Approval of Change Order #3 for East Nashville Magnet High School Stadium Improvements – Romach, Inc. c. Recommended Approval of Change Order #4 for Overton High School Additions and Renovations American Constructors, Inc
Metropolitan Board of Public Education Agenda – Page 2 November 14, 2017
5:55 7:00
VI. VII.
d. Awarding of Purchases and Contracts (1) Allovue, Inc. (2) Southern Kitchen Services, LLC (3) Tennessee Department of Children’s Services e. Legal Settlement L-16217 ($55,000)
REPORTS – OUR ORGANIZATION A. Director’s Report
1. KPI Report
B. Board Chairman’s Report 1. Chair Report 2. Announcements
ADJOURNMENT
METROPOLITAN BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION MEETING AND WORK SESSION – Minutes
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
Members present: Sharon Gentry, Jo Ann Brannon, Jill Speering (Vice-chair), Christiane Buggs, Tyese
Hunter, Mary Pierce, Amy Frogge Members absent:
Anna Shepherd (Chair), Will Pinkston, and Mary Pierce
Meeting called to order at 5:00 PM
CONVENE and ACTION Ms. Speering called the meeting to order.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Dr. Felder led the pledge.
30 SECONDS IN MY DISTRICT...
Each Board Member gave a brief update on each of their districts. AND THE GOOD NEWS IS...
A. Nashville Tools for Schools gave a brief presentation of their work and partnership with the district.
B. MNPS Music Students who traveled to Charlottesville, VA preformed an original
song for the Board.
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. Consent Agenda a. Approval of Minutes – 08/15/2017 and 08/22/2017 - Meetings
b. Recommended Award of Contract for General Construction for Hillsboro High School Additions & Renovations American Constructors, Inc.
c. Recommended Approval of Supplement #1 for Martin Luther King, Jr. Magnet High School
Additions & Renovations Phase II – Bauer Askew Architecture PLL d. Awarding of Purchases and Contracts (1) Blackboard, Inc.
(2) Educational Based Services, Inc. (3) Pomeroy North America
(4) Robert J. Young
e. Legal Settlement Claim C-35590 ($8,000) f. Legal Settlement Claim C-35651 ($3,000) g. Legal Settlement Claim C-35369 ($48,000) h. Legal Settlement Claim C-35607 ($3,000) i. Legal Settlement Claim C-35346 ($15,000) j. Legal Settlement Claim C-35557 ($6,000) k. Legal Settlement Claim C-35324 ($19,000) l. Legal Settlement Claim C-35556 ($16,100) m. Legal Settlement Claim L-16298 ($15,000) n. Compulsory Attendance Waivers
Motion to approve consent agenda as read. Motion by Jo Ann Brannon, second by Tyese Hunter.
Final Resolution: Motion Passess Yes: Sharon Gentry, Jo Ann Brannon, Jill Speering, Christiane Buggs, Tyese Hunter, Amy Frogge
B. BEP Ms. Frogge deferred the item to a later meeting.
WRITTEN INFORMATION TO THE BOARD (not for discussion)
A. Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Operating Budget Financial Reports B. Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Operating Budget Financial Reports
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Speering adjourned the meeting at 5:21 p.m.
BOARD WORK SESSION The Board held a work session and discuss the following topics:
New Eagle View Elementary Attendance Zone MNPS Next
TVAAS Results
ADJOURNMENT Board Work Session adjourned at 7:03 p.m.
_____________________________________________________
Chris M. Henson Anna Shepherd Date
Board Secretary Board Chair
METROPOLITAN BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION MEETING - Minutes Tuesday, October 17, 2017
Members present
Will Pinkston, Jo Ann Brannon, Jill Speering, Anna Shepherd, Christiane Buggs, Tyese
Hunter, Amy Frogge, Dr. Shawn Joseph
Members Absent Sharon Gentry and Mary Pierce
Meeting called to order at 5:00 PM
CONVENE and ACTION Ms. Shepherd called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance Led by Mr. Oldham.
30 Seconds in My District... Each Board Member gave a brief update on their districts.
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Teachers Helping Teachers
The Board and Dr. Joseph recognized a teacher who recently surprised a teacher who is
color blind, with color-blind glasses. Sixth grade teacher Joshua Lawhorn at Two Rivers
Middle School in the MacGavock cluster surprised art teacher, Kimberly Catlin with the
glasses.
Goodlettsville Elementary School
The Board recognized Mr. Oldham a longtime volunteer at Goodlettsville Elementary School.
Ms. Gibson, principal of Goodlettsville Elementary, showed a video on their schools’ SEL
development and made brief comments.
AND THE GOOD NEWS IS... The MLK String Quartet performed for the audience and Board before the meeting. Also
artwork from Tom Joy Elementary School was displayed in the Board Room.
Magnet School Grants Awards
Dr. Joseph updated the Board on the Magnet School Grant Awards.
Student Ambassadors - Pearl-Cohn Entertainment Magnet High School and Overton High
School
Student Ambassadors from Pearl-Cohn Entertainment Magnet High School and Overton High
School addressed the Board concerning their academies.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION A. Laura Leonard – Did not attend
B. Angelica Cooks Lucas – Did not attend
C. Quasia Walker – Did not attend
D. Liza Ramage – Ms. Ramage addressed the Board concerning partnership with NOAH.
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. Consent Agenda
Ms. Speering read the following consent agenda.
a. Recommended Award of Contract for General Construction for Hillsboro High
School Additions & Renovations – American Constructors, Inc.
b. Recommended Approval of Change Order #1 for Eagle View Elementary School
- Orion Building Corporation
c. Recommended Approval of Supplement #1 for Program Management Services –
Heery International, Inc.
d. Recommended Approval of Supplement #2 for Martin Luther King, Jr. Magnet
High School Additions & Renovations Phase II – Bauer Askew Architecture, PLLC
e. Recommended Approval of Supplement #2 for McMurray Middle School Additions &
Renovations – HMK Architects, PLLC
f. Recommended Approval of Supplement #2 for Overton High School Additions &
Renovations – TM Partners, PLLC
g. Awarding of Purchases and Contracts
(1) Analyze-Ed
(2) BrightBytes, Inc.
(3) Dearborn National (2)
(4) Dell Marketing, LLC
(5) Education Networks of America, LLC (ENA)
(6) Lakeshore Learning Materials
(7) Neely Coble Company, Inc.
Motion to approve consent agenda as read.
Motion by Jill Speering, second by Jo Ann Brannon.
Final Resolution: Motion Passess
Yes: Will Pinkston, Jo Ann Brannon, Jill Speering, Anna Shepherd, Christiane
Buggs, Tyese Hunter, Amy Frogge
B. BEP Litigation
Motion to join Shelby County litigation over BEP inadequacy by engaging Baller
Donelson as our legal counsel.
Motion by Amy Frogge, second by Will Pinkston.
Final Resolution: Motion Passess
Yes: Will Pinkston, Jo Ann Brannon, Jill Speering, Anna Shepherd, Christiane
Buggs, Tyese Hunter, Amy Frogge
REPORTS
A. MAP-R and ACT
Dr. Changas presented the MAP-R and ACT results to the Board.
B. 2018-2019 District Calendar
Mr. McAdory presented the 2018-19 District Calendar to the Board.
Committee Reports
A. Teaching and Learning
Ms. Buggs gave a brief Teaching and Learning Committee report.
Board Chairman's Report
A. Chair Report
Ms. Shepherd announced the 2018-19 Committee Assignments.
B. Announcements
Dr. Brannon announcement that Granberry Elementary School will host their Trucks and
Tunes festival and concert event on October 21st.
Ms. Frogge announced that Westmeade Elementary School has partnered with Burlington as
their new PENCIL partner. Burlington donated $10,000 to the school for teacher supplies.
Ms. Speering offered condolences to Ms. Willet Lanier, a retired MNPS teacher.
Ms. Speering announced that she attended the Chamber of Commerce tour of Jere Baxter
Middle Prep.
Ms. Speering announced that she participated in a community meeting and luncheon at
Gra Mar Middle Prep.
Ms. Speering announced that she participated in Dan Mills Elementary Walk to School Day.
Ms. Speering thanked Dr. Joseph for conducting the Educator Voice Sessions.
Ms. Speering announced that the Parent Advisory Committee met at Park Avenue
Elementary School.
Ms. Speering announced that she attended the Hispanic Heritage Celebration at
Goodlettsville Middle Prep.
Ms. Speering announced that Maplewood Monday would resume October 23rd at 11:30 a.m.
Ms. Hunter announced that the CNAP festival would be held at the Global Mall on October
28th.
Ms. Buggs announced that Congressman Cooper will host an Academy day on October 21st.
Ms. Buggs announced in Ms. Pierces absence that the Hillsboro Construction Update meeting
will be held October 19th at 6:00 p.m. at Hillsboro High School.
Ms. Buggs announced that the Envision Napier meeting will be held October 19st at 8:00
a.m.
ADJOURNMENT Ms. Buggs adjourned the meeting at 7:01 p.m.
________________________________________________________
Chris M. Henson Anna Shepherd Date
Board Secretary Board Chair
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. ACTIONS
1. CONSENT
b. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #3 FOR EAST NASHVILLE
MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM IMPROVEMENTS – ROMACH, INC.
We are requesting approval to make the following changes to this contract:
1. Revised scope due to Metro ADA drawing review $ 384.50 2. Reimbursement of NES Service Fee 9,143.78 3. Reimbursement of Sewer Tap Fee 903.00 4. Provide and install foundation drain at bleacher
grade beam 3,842.54 5. Add voltage transformer at scoreboard 796.66 6. Micropiles added during bleacher submittal process 9,032.02 7. Remove and replace unsuitable soils 32,016.00 8. Add flagpole 3,315.51 9. Add bracing of urinal screens 656.40 10. Add utility truck 9,968.52 11. Coat and restripe track 31,447.50 12. Add relocation of lighting fixtures due to conflict with
duct work 1,010.92 13. Delete owner’s contingency (50,000.00)
Total change order amount $ 52,517.35
It is recommended that this change order be approved.
Legality approved by Metro Department of Law.
FUNDING: 45017.80404317
DATE: November 14, 2017
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. ACTIONS
1. CONSENT
c. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #4 FOR OVERTON HIGH SCHOOL
ADDITIONS AND RENOVATIONS – AMERICAN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. We are requesting approval to make the following changes to this contract: 1. Addition to Contract Contingency $652,160 2. Allowance for Site Drainage repair $ 75,000 3. Move Fire Alarm Panel $ 10,000 4. Repair Auditorium seats $ 10,000 5. Additional Asbestos Abatement $ 10,840 6. Allowance for ADA Inspector items $ 20,000 7. Allowance for additional door hardware $ 57,000 8. Allowance to add toilet to Clinic $ 15,000 Total $850,000 It is recommended that this change order be approved. Legality approved by Metro Department of Law. FUNDING: 45015.80404215 DATE: November 14, 2017
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. ACTIONS
1. CONSENT
d. AWARDING OF PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS
VENDOR: Allovue, Inc.
SERVICE/GOODS: Awarded from RFP 18-2. Allovue provides the consulting and implementation of Priority-Based Budget (PBB) framework across central office departments. Allovue assists departments to align their department priorities with district priorities and to align all budget requests with department priorities. Additionally, Allovue will work with departments to identify measurable, intended outcomes related to proposed programs and budget requests. The project will be phased in over a 3-year time period with approximately 20 programs per year being implemented.
TERM: November 15, 2017 through June 30, 2020
FOR WHOM MNPS Central Office Departments
COMPENSATION: $200 per/hour inclusive of travel
Estimated hours: Year 1: 450 x $200 per hour = $ 90,000 Year 2: 350 x $200 per hour = $ 70,000 Year 3: 350 x $200 per hour = $ 70,000
3-year Total: $230,000
Total Compensation under this contract is not to exceed $300,000.
OVERSIGHT: Office of Director of Schools
EVALUATION: Based on deliverables detailed in the contractor’s proposal and the benefits achieved relative to the cost.
MBPE CONTRACT NUMBER: TBD
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Operating Budget
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. ACTIONS
1. CONSENT
d. AWARDING OF PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS
VENDOR: Southern Kitchen Services, LLC
SERVICE/GOODS: Awarded from RFP 18-3. This contract is for the cleaning of kitchen hoods and exhaust ducts at schools.
TERM: November 15, 2017 through October 31, 2020
FOR WHOM: MNPS Schools
COMPENSATION: Service charge is a minimum of $325 per site with a maximum of $525 per site.
Total compensation for this contract is not to exceed $225,000.
OVERSIGHT: Nutrition Services
EVALUATION: Contractor will be evaluated on timeliness and successfulness of performance as outlined in contractor’s scope of work.
MBPE CONTRACT NUMBER: TBD
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Nutrition Services Fund
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
A. ACTIONS
1. CONSENT
e. AWARDING OF PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS VENDOR: Tennessee Department of Children’s Services
SERVICE/GOODS: Amendment 1 to the Grant Contract. The grant is for MNPS to employ a District Trauma-Informed Schools Coordinator to promote widespread awareness about the impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on school success, lifelong health, and wellness. That information will drive trauma-informed school culture and practices throughout the district. This supports and enhances district priorities. The results of this Coordinator service improve academic achievement and school success for MNPS students. The Coordinator creates and updates ACEs training materials; establishes and supports a team of MNPS ACEs trainers; provides and coordinates district-wide professional development activities; establishes and supports trauma-informed culture and school-wide practices at one (1) district pilot school and ten (10) trauma-informed focus schools; promotes district-wide implementation; implements the Handle With Care notification system so district schools are notified when a student is a victim of or witness to an incident resulting in a police report (collaboration with the MNPD); and actively participates in ACE Nashville and other community collective impact groups. The grant is also used to employ a trauma-informed practitioner at the district’s trauma- informed pilot school to provide trauma-informed support for building staff and trauma- specific interventions for students at Fall Hamilton Enhanced Option School. This amendment extends the term an additional year and increases funding.
TERM: Amendment 1 extends the term an additional year for a new term of: October 17, 2016 through June 30, 2018.
FOR WHOM Fall-Hamilton Enhanced Option School (pilot school), and trauma- informed focus schools including: Bellshire Design Center, Eakin Elementary School, Hermitage Elementary School, Inglewood Elementary School, Meigs Magnet Middle School, Murrell School, Napier Elementary School, Tulip Grove Elementary School, Warner Enhanced Option Elementary School, and Waverly Belmont Elementary School.
COMPENSATION: Amendment 1 adds additional grant revenue of $200,000.
OVERSIGHT: Student Support Services
EVALUATION: Quarterly reports summarizing grant activities, outputs and outcomes are provided to DCS as required using their grant monitoring template.
MBPE CONTRACT NUMBER: 2-00380-01A1
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Grant Revenue – Adverse Childhood Experiences
(ACEs) Initiative
EXCEEDINGGREATEXPECTATIONS
1
School Board Meeting November 14, 2017
2
Our FoundationOUR VISION
• Metro Nashville Public Schools will be the
fastest-improving urban school system in
America, ensuring that every student
becomes a life-long learner prepared for
success in college, career and life.
OUR MISSION
• We deliver a great public
education to every student, every
day.
OUR VALUES
• Whole learner, literacy,excellence,
relevance, innovation, talent,
collaboration, equity and diversity.
Strategic Framework Goal Areas
3
Strategic Planning Phases
Gather Input
& Information
Strategic Framework Annual & Baseline
Measures
Implementation
& Planning
Develop Infrastructure
& Skills
4
PLANNED
Strategic Planning Phases
Gather Input
& Information
Strategic Framework Annual & Baseline
Measures
Implementation
& Planning
Develop Infrastructure
& Skills
5
ACTUAL
APR 2017 to NOV 2017 JUL 2016 to JAN 2017 DEC 2016 to APR 2017
APR 2017 to NOV 2017 DEC 2017 to JUN 2018
PHASE PHASE
PHASE PHASE PHASE
MNPS Accountability and Assessment Results
TCAP/TNReady Results
TNReady was administered in 2016-17 for the first time in
grades 3-8 and for the second time in selected high school
courses
The new TNReady performance standards meet or exceed
the ACT college readiness standards
The majority of MNPS students and Tennessee students at
each tier fall short of the new On Track requirements for
English/Language Arts and Mathematics
The percentage of MNPS students scoring On Track or
higher is below the statewide percentage in all subject areas
7
2017 MNPS and Statewide TNReady Results for
English/Language Arts
25.4 25.8 24.7
34.0 33.6 34.3
0
25
50
75
3-5 ELA 6-8 ELA HS ELA
Perc
ent O
n T
rack
or
Maste
red
Grade Span/Subject
MNPS TN
8
2017 MNPS and Statewide TNReady Results for
Mathematics
29.225.9
12.5
40.135.8
21.5
0
25
50
75
3-5 Math 6-8 Math HS Math
Perc
ent O
n T
rack
or
Maste
red
Grade Span/Subject
MNPS TN
9
2017 MNPS and Statewide TNReady Results for
Science
39.5
46.7
36.2
55.861.4
51.0
0
25
50
75
3-5 Science 6-8 Science HS Science
Perc
ent O
n T
rack
or
Maste
red
Grade Span/Subject
MNPS TN
10
MNPS TNReady High School End of Course
Exam Results for 2016 and 2017
22.8
12.2
34.4
24.7
12.5
36.2
0
25
50
75
HS ELA HS Math HS Science
Perc
ent O
n T
rack
or
Maste
red
Grade Span/Subject
2016 2017
11
2017 MNPS TNReady Grades 3-8 Results by
Student Subgroup for English/Language Arts
30.723.0
36.4 35.5 34.519.6
40.449.5
63.6
43.7
36.9
45.5 46.941.4
39.6
45.141.2
27.3
21.3
30.6
16.1 16.120.7
31.8
13.3 8.6 7.64.3 9.5
2.0 1.5 3.4 9.01.2
0.7 1.5
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
All Asian Black Hispanic NativeAmerican
White EconomicDisadv
ELL SWD
Perc
ent of S
tudents
% Below % Approaching % On Track % Mastered
2017 MNPS TNReady Grades 3-8 Results by
Student Subgroup for Mathematics
36.921.9
46.538.8 36.2
24.4
47.2 46.1
67.3
35.4
33.1
35.038.8 41.4
34.2
35.8 37.0
21.521.5
30.1
15.9 19.1 19.0
30.0
14.8 14.6 8.46.2 14.9
2.6 3.3 3.411.4
2.2 2.3 2.8
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
All Asian Black Hispanic NativeAmerican
White EconomicDisadv
ELL SWD
Perc
ent of S
tudents
% Below % Approaching % On Track % Mastered
District State Accountability Status:
Achieving
Achieving is the 2nd highest of 4 performance categories:
Exemplary, Achieving, Progressing, In Need of Improvement
Districts designated as Achieving are meeting the
growth expectation for all students and historically
underserved student groups, on average.
14
State Recognition: Reward Schools
for Performance and Progress
East End Preparatory School
Hume-Fogg High
Martin Luther King Jr School
Meigs Middle
15
State Recognition: Reward Schools
for Performance
Glendale Elementary
Lockeland Elementary
Percy Priest Elementary
Purpose Prep
16
State Recognition: Reward Schools
for Progress
Cameron College Preparatory
KIPP Nashville Collegiate High
KIPP Nashville College Prep
LEAD Prep Southeast
New Vision Academy
Rose Park Middle
17
State Recognition: Improving
Priority Improving
Inglewood Elementary
John B. Whitsitt Elementary
Focus Improving – Gap Closure
May Werthan Shayne Elementary
18
Our Students
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
20
2017-18 Priorities by Goal Area
PRIORITY 1 Curriculum, Instruction
& Assessment
PRIORITY 2 School Culture &
Climate
PRIORITY 3 College & Career
Readiness
PRIORITY 4 Organizational
Development & Effectiveness
PRIORITY 6 Equity & Access
PRIORITY 5 Performance
Management & Operational Efficiency
PRIORITY 7 Family & Community
Engagement
Interdependencies Across Areas
21
Our Students [Priorities]
PRIORITY 1 Curriculum, Instruction
& Assessment
PRIORITY 2 School Culture &
Climate
PRIORITY 3 College & Career
Readiness
MNPS KPIsPerformance Management & Alignment
22
Schools
• Academic, Behavioral, SEL & Climate KPIs
• State Accountability Measures
• School Improvement Plans
District
•KPIs by Strategic Framework Goal Area•State Accountability Measures•Priority Project Plans
• Policy Governance
• Director of Schools Evaluation
Quarterly Monitoring & Reporting
23
GOLD FAST Early Reading & Math MAP-R & MAP-M TVAAS FAST Curriculum Based
Measures EL – English Proficiency Students with Disabilities
Proficiency Family Engagement Graduation Rate AP, IB & Cambridge Pathway Dual Credit/Dual
Enrollment ACT Industry Certifications
Academic KPIs
Chronic Absence Social Emotional
Learning Discipline Family
Engagement MTSS
Behavior, SEL & Climate KPIs
Our Students
KPIs
Pre-K Student Performance Assessment - GOLD
24
**GOLD is an observational assessment. Teachers with more
training, and experience with GOLD have higher reliability. Numbers
could fluctuate as they gain reliability.
Developmental Band
% of students meeting2015 - 2016 2016 - 2017
Physical 89.0% 89.1%
Cognitive 85.6% 84.9%
Social Emotional 86.4% 87.7%
Language 81.3% 81.8%
Literacy 90.4% 90.2%
Mathematics 80.6% 80.5%
Fall 2017 FAST Percent of MNPS Students in Grades K-1 Academically At Risk
Subject Area% of Students
at Risk
Reading 45.6%
Math 43.9%
Note: These numbers reflect the percentage of MNPS
K-1 students scoring below the 25th percentile on the
FAST Early Reading and Early Math assessments.
Fall 2017 MAP Percent of MNPS Students in Grades 2-8 in National Quintiles 4-5
Subject Area% of Students in
Quintiles 4-5
Reading 32.9%
Math 25.1%
Note: Quintiles 4-5 represent the top 40% of students
nationally (National Percentiles 61-99) with respect to
academic achievement.
TVAAS District-Wide Effectiveness
Subject Area Effectiveness
Composite Level 1
Literacy Level 3
Numeracy Level 1
Literacy and Numeracy Level 1
Science Level 4
Social Studies Level 1
Note: Level 3 indicates academic growth equivalent to the 2017
state average. Levels 4 and 5 reflect growth that is statistically
significantly above the state while levels 1 and 2 are significantly
below the state.
2017 TVAAS School Effectiveness
Distribution by Subject
TVAAS Score
Composite Literacy NumeracyLiteracy & Numeracy
ScienceSocial
Studies
# of Schools
% of Schools
# of Schools
% of Schools
# of Schools
% of Schools
# of Schools
% of Schools
# of Schools
% of Schools
# of Schools
% of Schools
5 24 31.6 23 30.7 19 25.0 21 27.6 29 38.7 4 15.4
4 1 1.3 4 5.3 3 3.9 0 0.0 3 4.0 3 11.5
3 7 9.2 13 17.3 9 11.8 13 17.1 3 4.0 7 26.9
2 4 5.3 9 12.0 2 2.6 3 3.9 4 5.3 1 3.8
1 40 52.6 26 34.7 43 56.6 39 51.3 36 48.0 11 42.3
Total 76 100.0 75 100.0 76 100.0 76 100.0 75 100.0 26 100.0
Note: The district did not receive TVAAS results for elementary schools in 2017 due to the state’s
failure to administer TNReady in 2016. The state did not compute TVAAS for grade 4. For grades 5
and up they measured gains over two years – from 2015 to 2017. Since testing begins in grade 3, we
did not have growth data for elementary schools.
English Proficiency of English Learners
29
EL AMAO 1 and 22014 ELDA
Assessment2015 ACCESSAssessment
2016 ACCESSAssessment
2017 ACCESS 2.0 Assessment***
English Language Fluency (Any
Improvement)67% 76.2% 79.0% 34.6%***
English Language Fluency (0.7 from
previous year)N/A*
48.3%(state target
39.7%)51.0%
13.7% ***(state target not
defined)
English Language Fluency (Based on
Differentiated Criteria)
N/A N/A N/A 41.2%****
Proficiency 19.3%9.4%**
(state target 4.7%)13.6%
14.5%*** (state target not
defined)
*Implemented in 2015 with ACCESS to measure language growth
**New criteria for exit rate changed to 5 total composite and 5 literacy composite.
***Implemented new standards, scoring scales, and criteria for ACCESS in 2017
****Differentiated Criteria for the Growth Standard uses either one year or two year growth metrics. Since new
standards, scoring scales, and criteria were adopted for ACCESS in 2017, we expect the two year growth rate
to drop from 2016-17 to 2017-18.
2017 TNReady MNPS Results for All Students and for Exceptional Ed Students
Note: Results include Multi-State Alternative Assessment (MSAA) data for severely
disabled students.
Subject Grades
All Students Exceptional Education
# Tested% On Track
or Mastered # Tested% On Track
or Mastered
English/LA 3-8 37,011 25.6 4678 9.1
9-12 14,829 26.7 1479 6.3
3-12 51,840 25.9 6157 8.4
Math 3-8 37,178 27.6 4694 11.2
9-12 15,053 14.8 1303 4.5
3-12 52,231 23.9 5997 9.7
Family Engagement
#
Students Having ParentWith Account
16246(17.27%)
Parent Accounts 11735
Parent Logins 130927
Average Weekly Logins 7050
31
Parent Portal
Account Use
2017-18 # of schools
Active SSO 69
Pending SSO 3
School Level Parent Advisory Group or Coalition
4
TOTAL 73
Active School Support
(SSO)/PTA/PAC
organization
Note: Data represents date range of 7/3/17 to
11/9/17 from the district level Infinite Campus Portal
Usage Summary Report.
Active = Organization has completed required
paperwork and may fundraise on behalf of their
school.
Pending/Incomplete = Organization has submitted
required paperwork but have some required
documents missing and they may not fundraise.
MNPS High School Graduation Rate by Subgroup
78
.7%
84
.4%
73
.0%
86
.9%
78
.4%
73
.2% 80
.7%
75
.3%
53
.6%
71
.0%
81
.6%
85
.9%
77
.4% 8
6.4
%
81
.4%
79
.2%
82
.3%
79
.3%
54
.6%
73
.5%81
.0%
85
.9%
76
.4%
87
.6%
82
.0%
75
.5% 81
.9%
79
.5%
60
.3%
71
.7%8
0.3
%
86.1
%
74.8
%
88.0
%
81.6
%
74.1
% 81.1
%
75.6
%
58.2
%
68.9
%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
All Female Male Asian Black Hispanic White EconDisadv
SpecialEd
LEP
Pe
rce
nt o
f S
tud
en
ts
2014 2015 2016 2017
32
Advanced Academics
Program# Tests
Attempted % Passed
Advanced Placement 5162 45%
International Baccalaureate 967 43%
Cambridge 727 53%
# Awarded
IB Diploma 39
CP Certificate 29
Industry Certification & Pathway Dual Credit
34
NOTE: In 2017-18, the large increase in participation is due to district funding availability.
Industry Certifications
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-2018Enrolled to
Test
Tested 307 437 700 1333
Passed 140 207 415
Passage
Rate
46% 47% 59%
Pathway Dual Credit
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-2018Enrolled to
Test
Tested 953 1372 983 1805
Passed 422 604 749
Passage
Rate
44% 44% 76%
35
Composite Results
Average Score
2016 2017
# of Graduates 4394 4412
# Tested 3865 4027
Participation Rate 88% 91%
# 21 or Higher
(Composite)
1209 1278
% 21 or Higher
(Composite)
31.3% 31.7%
Exam Results by
Subject
Subject
Average Score
2016 2017
Composite 18.7 19.0
English 18.1 18.1
Math 18.1 18.4
Reading 19.3 19.3
Science 18.9 19.3
MNPS ACT Results for 2016 and 2017
Chronic Absence
36
84.2%
15.8%
83.1%
16.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Non-Chronically Absent Chronically Absent
2015-2017 % Chronically Absent vs. Non-Chronically
Absent Students
2015-2016 2016-2017
59.6%
24.6%
11.9%3.8%
55.5%
27.5%
12.4%
4.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Satisfactory Borderline Moderate Severe
Non-Chronically Absent Chronically Absent
2015-2017 Breakdown by Attendance Category
2015-2016 2016-2017
NOTE: Chronic absence is defined as missing 10% or more of available school days for any reason (excused, unexcused,
suspension, etc).
Satisfactory 95% or more of all attendance days
Borderline 91% - 95% of all attendance days
Moderate 80% - 90% of all attendance days
Severe <80% of all attendance days
Pre-K Chronic Absence
37
76.1%
23.9%
74.7%
25.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Non-Chronically Absent Chronically Absent
2015-2017 Pre-K Data%Chronically Absent vs. Non-Chronically
Absent Students
2015-2016 2016-2017
Discipline
38
10,337
565 251
8,357
390 2020
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Suspended Remanded to ALC Expelled
2015-2017 # of Students with Discipline Incidents Resulting in Loss of Instruction Time
by Behavior Response Type
2015-2016 2016-2017
KPI Data Collection – Underway
• FAST Curriculum-Based Measures (Early Reading, Early Math, CBM Reading, CBM Math)
• Social Emotional Learning – School Admin team tier one behavior strategy training
• MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Support) – School conditions indicator and implementation progress monitoring
39
40
PHASE 2: Priority Plan Presentations
January February March AprilPRIORITY 1
Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment
PRIORITY 2 School Culture & Climate
PRIORITY 3 College & Career Readiness
PRIORITY 4 Organizational
Development & Effectiveness
PRIORITY 6 Equity & Access
PRIORITY 5 Performance Management
& Operational Efficiency
PRIORITY 7 Family & Community
Engagement
Consistent Presentation Structure What is the current state? (Problem) What are we doing about it? What help is needed?
PHASE 3 2018-19 Priority Planning Begins
2018-19 School Year
Next Steps
• Establishing a system to monitor the work
• Building capacity of key leaders to support and execute priority work with fidelity
• Continuing work to connect district strategies to direct school supports
• Supporting school prioritization of KPIs
• Aligning school-based budgets to KPIs
• Assessing school needs vs. available resources
• Prioritizing budget requests/needs vs. availability of budget resources
• Surveying schools currently underway re: school climate and culture
• Evolving budget priorities from 17/18 academic supports to 18/19 SEL supports
41
Questions?
42
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 1
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance OUR STUDENTS: Create an environment that promotes active student engagement and consistent improvement
in academic achievement among pre-k-12 students from all backgrounds and programs.
PURPOSE: This document covers the following three aspects of the MNPS Multi-tiered system of support (MTSS): 1 - Academics; 2 - SEL/Behavior (Climate); 3 - School Organization & Capacity Building. These KPIs will enable MNPS to focus efforts and resources to empower each MNPS student to exceed great expectations. The indicators included in this document are intended to act as a roadmap for data conversations among students, schools, staff, families, community partners and all central office supports. We commit to regularly reflecting and regrouping our actions by questioning how specific efforts help or hinder progress on these indicators.
Exceeding Great Expectations MTSS – Academics_ Key Performance Indicators (Target Range) Tools for Data Analysis GOLD (student performance assessment)
Pre K • 80% of all students will be on or above the appropriate developmental band in social-emotional, physical, language, literacy, math, cognition domains
• Monitor three checkpoint outcome measures from fall, winter, and spring at school level, classroom level, as well as within and across all subgroups
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results FAST Early Reading FAST Early Math
K - 1st
• Each year, reduce the percentage of all students considered at risk (below the 25th national percentile) by 3 - 5%
• Monitor three (3) benchmark outcome measures from fall, winter, and spring at school level, classroom level, as well as within and across all subgroups
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results MAP-R & MAP-M
2nd - 8th • 60% of all students will meet or exceed their projected RIT scores • Growth rate of 3 - 5 percentage points in the 4th quintile or
higher
• Monitor three (3) benchmark outcome measures at school level, classroom level, as well as within and across all subgroups
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
TVAAS 4th - 12th • School-wide TVAAS scores at 3 or above (Composite and all tested areas)
• Review scores from previous school year. Utilize student level TVAAS Projection Report to identify students in need of additional support
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
FAST Curriculum-Based Measures (Early Reading, Early Math, CBM Reading, CBM Math)
K - 12th • Overall movement through the tiers of 3 -5% per year (all students moving from tier III to tier II, and from tier II to tier I)
• Monitor CBM screening and progress monitoring measures for students receiving skills-based interventions
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
English Proficiency of English Learners
K - 12th • Growth in four language domains Composite score of ACCESS by 1 proficiency level
• Review WIDA ACCESS scores from previous years • Monitor program patterns which minimally includes the number of students
exiting and time in program
Proficiency of Students with Disabilities (SWDs)
Pre K - 12th • Increase percentage of Exceptional Education students reaching proficiency by 3 - 5 percentage points each year in reading and math on the end of year summative assessments
• MAP, Fastbridge & end of year summative assessments, team evaluations and LRE data
Family Engagement Pre K - 12th • Increase the number of opportunities parents have to partner academically with the school
• Increase the percentage of students having parents with portal accounts and who access their students record by 3 - 5%
• Review parent/family suggestions • Infinite Campus Parent Portal Usage Summary Report
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 2
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Exceeding Great Expectations
MTSS – Academics_ Key Performance Indicators (Target Range) Tools for Data Analysis Graduation Rate
9th – 12th • Annual gains in Graduation Rates of 2 - 3% school-wide and across all subgroups
• Review graduation rates from previous school year within and across all subgroups
• Monitor At-Risk Student List Report to identify students at risk of drop out • Monitor cohort data rosters • Track retention/promotion rates from year to year • Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
Advanced Placement 9th - 12th • Increase the testing participation rate by 3 - 5% • Increase the number of students achieving a passing score (AP
score of 3 or higher, or IB score of 4 or higher, or a Cambridge score of A-E) on an advanced academic examination by 3 - 5% (Years 2-4)
• Increase the number of students receiving an IB diploma, Cambridge AICE diploma, or the CP (Career-related Programme) certificate by 3 - 5%
• Review enrollment of students taking courses, the number of students testing, and the number of students passing the exam
• View data within and across all subgroups to ensure opportunities are equitable
International Baccalaureate
9th - 12th
Cambridge 9th - 12th
Pathway Dual Credit/Dual Enrollment
10th - 12th • Annual gains in participation of 3 - 5% each year • Annual gains in pass rate of 3 - 5% (years 2-4)
• Review participation and pass rates for all students and subgroups • Review past student performance success rate
ACT 11th • Increase number of all students scoring 21+ on the ACT Composite Score by 2 - 3 percentage points
• School-wide average ACT composite score increases by 2 - 3 tenths of a point
• Review TVAAS projections for every student that aligns to ACT • Review Analyze ED data • Review ACT school wide report • Review students’ scheduling progression in preparation for ACT
Industry Certifications 12th • Annual gains in participation of 3 - 5% each year
• Annual gains in pass rate of 3 - 5% (years 2-4) • Review participation and pass rates for all students within and across
subgroups • Review past student performance success rate
NOTE: A formative assessment for 9th – 12th grade is TBD. Once determined, the information in this document will be updated.
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 3
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Exceeding Great Expectations
MTSS-SEL/Behavior (School Climate)_ Key Performance Indicators (Target Range)
Tools for Data Analysis
Chronic Absence
Pre K -12th • Annual gains in satisfactory student attendance (Students with Average Daily Attendance of 95% or higher) – measured by a 3 - 5% reduction of students that do not have satisfactory attendance school-wide and across all subgroups
• Reduce the percentage of chronically absent students by 5% across all subgroups
• The percentage of chronically absent Pre-K students will be at or below the state average of 22%
• Increase number of students with an At Risk Attendance Flag being referred for additional services and support
• Review the following Data Warehouse Reports: Attendance Dashboard, At Risk Students List and Chronic Absence Summary Report at mid-terms and the conclusion of each quarter
• Review data by school level, grade level, as well as within and across all subgroups
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
Social Emotional Learning Pre K -12th • 100% of school administration team will be trained on a tier one behavior strategy
• 3 - 5% decrease in the number of student discipline incidents (Demonstrates the level of SEL training and implementation)
• Review Panorama and SEL Climate Walk-Through Rubric outcome measures
• Review SEL 5 Core Competencies in the elementary report card • Review Fidelity Checks of tier I behavior strategy • Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results
Discipline
Pre K - 12th • 3 - 5% decrease in the number of students with discipline incidents resulting in loss of instructional time ( e.g. out of school suspension, remanded to Alternative Learning Centers, and expulsion)
• Increase number of students with an At Risk Discipline Flag being referred for additional services and support
• Review the following Data Warehouse Reports: Discipline Dashboard, At Risk Students List, OSS-Expelled- Remanded Report, and Incident Counts Threshold Student Lists at mid-terms and the conclusion of each quarter
• Review data by school level, grade level, as well as within and across all subgroups to ensure equitable and equal treatment
• Monitor and audit application of processes to ensure practices are aligned with policies
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results Family Engagement Pre K - 12th • Form a minimum of one formal parent group (active school
support/PTA/PAC organization) at your school to strengthen collaboration between families and educators to enhance parent voice
• Increase Parent Survey participation 3 - 5% NOTE: Beginning in year two (2018-19) indicators will be based on specific opportunities for improvement identified in the parent survey baseline data trends.
• Review school level results of District Parent Survey and Family Engagement Readiness Survey
• Review parent focus group results
NOTE: A schools’ climate can consist of many aspects including areas like safety (emotional, intellectual, and physical), common high expectations, trust among students, trust among adults, trust between students and adults, connectedness among teachers, connectedness among students, behavior, absences/attendance, family engagement, and Social and Emotional Learning. The Panorama survey will measure several elements of a school climate and will provide schools with specific areas of refinement and reinforcement.
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 4
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Exceeding Great Expectations
MTSS – School Organization & Capacity Building_ Key Performance Indicators (Target Range)
Tools for Data Analysis
MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Support)
Pre K - 12th • Schools will have the necessary conditions in place for implementation of MTSS, as measured through a score of at least 80% on the MTSS School Assessment Tool
• Schools will increase fidelity of implementation each year, as measured through School Assessment Tool and implementation walk-throughs
• Review MTSS School Assessment Tool results • Review feedback from MTSS Leadership, Development, and School
Leadership team meetings • Review data from school visits and walkthroughs
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 5
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
ADDENDUM A
MNPS MTSS Definition & Visual
MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Support) is a comprehensive framework of evidence based, system-wide practices to support a timely response to a continuum of academic, social-emotional, and behavioral needs, using data-based decision making to empower each MNPS student to exceed great expectations. See Figure 1
Figure 1: MTSS Comprehensive Framework Model
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 6
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
ADDENDUM B
Probing Questions – consider as you review data and determine adjustments to practice
GOLD (student performance assessment) Are work samples provided for each learning objective assessed? What evidence did you discover in the student’s work samples that indicate student is above, at or below expectations? How do work samples reflect valid student growth from fall to winter and winter to spring? How is data used to develop lesson plans at each developmental level? How will teachers use this information to adjust small groups in literacy and math? How will you identify and provide effective instruction around key objectives that fall below expectations? How do you ensure that all students (including SWDs) have access to high-quality differentiated core instruction (Tier I)? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) FAST Early Reading & Math How will teachers use the information from this skills based assessment to inform practice and guide instruction? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management)How will teachers use data to differentiate instruction to ensure growth for all students? How do you ensure that all students (including SWDs) have access to high-quality differentiated core instruction (Tier I) in ELA and math? How are you using these assessments to identify students for interventions targeted to meet specific skill needs and to progress monitor outcomes for those students? MAP-R (Reading) & MAP-M (Math) How will your school use RIT data to progress monitor all students that fall below the 2nd quintile? What interventions does your school intend to implement for students below the 2nd quintile? Are those students being progress monitored? If a large percentage of students fall below the 2nd quintile, what is being done to change core instruction? What interventions are being implemented to ensure growth for students meeting or exceeding projected growth? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) How are you using this RIT data to drive work of the professional learning community at your school? How do you ensure that all students (including students with disabilities) have access to high-quality differentiated core instruction (Tier I) in ELA and math? How are you using these assessments as part of the universal screening process to identify students for intervention, remediation, and enrichment? How are you using Fastbridge data to help determine skills-based needs of students falling below the 25th percentile on MAP? TVAAS What can be learned from previous year’s data? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management)Are there trends over the last three years? In reviewing progress monitor data with MAP, are there correlations with previous year TVASS scores? How are you using the diagnostic reports available through TVAAS to make adjustments to classroom practices and regular observations?
FAST Curriculum-Based Measures (Early Reading, Early Math, CBM Reading, CBM Math) What is your school's tier based intervention model? How are you using CBM screening assessments to identify students (including SWDs) for interventions targeted to meet specific skill needs? What skills-based interventions for ELA (using evidence-based practices) are being implemented for students falling below the 25th percentile? What skills-based interventions for Math (using evidence-based practices) are being implemented for students falling below the 25th percentile?
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 7
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Is regular progress monitoring (using FAST) being conducted for students receiving Tier II and III and special education interventions in reading and math? Do students have access to interventions at increasing levels of intensity? How does the data-based decision making process facilitate transitions between tiers? Are you discussing students with disabilities in your data team meetings? English Proficiency of English Learners What percentage of students made progress in their reading, writing, listening, and speaking (ACCESS)? How long on average have students been active in the EL program? Are those students making progress in language and achievement? How will teachers use data to differentiate instruction to ensure growth for all students? What evidenced English Language strategies are present throughout your school to consistently support English Language Learners in their literacy growth? Are high school EL students also achieving in content classes? Proficiency of Students with Disabilities (SWDs) Are you analyzing data for SWDs using MAP and Fastbridge to determine if students are showing growth toward the end of year summative assessment? Are you using behavior data to determine how much instructional time is lost due to suspension/discipline? Does your data in Easy IEP (Individualized Education Plan) align with interventions that are being provided to SWDs? Are special education teachers providing intensive interventions aligned to the student’s area of need as outlined in the IEP as well as data from MAP and Fastbridge? How are you monitoring the IEPs written for students to make sure they are instructionally appropriate as outlined in the IAIEP rubric provided? Are you utilizing your individual student data (MAP/Fastbridge) to make sure students are receiving intervention and supports in their specific area of need (Data Based Decision Making)? Do you have interventions scheduled into the day and are SWDs receiving their most intensive interventions (from Exceptional Education teachers) in addition to the core instruction (from general
education teachers)? Are you utilizing the guidance for interventionist linked to the TEAM rubric for special education teachers? Are your special education teachers providing core content only to students on an alternative assessment? (all other students should be in general education setting with core content experts) For students on an alternative assessment, are special education teachers teaching core content connectors aligned to TN state standards and providing interventions in addition to core content
standards? Have you analyzed your least restrictive environment data (LRE) on a regular basis to make sure SWDs are included in the general education setting 80% or greater of their day. Are general education teachers differentiating instruction to support SWDs access to core instruction? Family Engagement Academics What strategies do we have in place to reach more parents/families regarding their students’ overall school performance? How do we tailor our outreach to meet the needs of our culturally diverse families? What are we doing to ensure educators have the capacity to engage parents around their student’s overall school performance? What practices (e.g. positive phone calls, texts, home
visits, data chats) are educators expected to use and how you support and hold them accountable to those practices? Who’s trained to monitor and communicate with families via the Infinite Campus portal at the school and classroom level? School Climate What does the data say regarding parent perception of your school? Does your school have effective two way communication strategies in place to reach all families of all demographics? Does the communication take place in multiple languages? Does your school have a strategy to recruit and retain parent leaders? Does your school have a functioning parent support group? What strategies does your school have in place to consistently and intentionally engage parents of Non-English Language backgrounds and disabilities to participate in their child's school? What is your school’s strategy to identify and form collaborations with external partners aligned with your school’s strategic goals? What impact does having or not having engaged families have on the schools’ overall climate? What other elements of climate (e.g. SEL, discipline, chronic absences, tier I behavior approach) does the school need to pay attention to the most in order to impact improvement in the
engagement of families in the learning process? What professional development have you offered your staff through Equity and Diversity University to build their capacity to engage families?
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 8
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Graduation Rate • What can be learned from previous year’s data? • Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management)Are there trends over the last three years? • What supports are in place for students identified through early warning indicator reports? • What is your process for identifying over age under credit students? What are your intervention strategies for over age under credit students (School options and Non-Traditional Options)? How are you working to make sure SWDs are on track to graduate? Are your counselors involved in course of study and alignment to graduation requirement for SWDs? Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, and Cambridge How are students identified and/or selected for AP, IB, and Cambridge courses? Are we capturing all students with the potential to succeed in these classes? Are additional supports accessible to all students (i.e. Do they require internet at home, etc.)? What are we doing to support students who are not successful with grades and have low test scores in these courses? Are all subgroups reflected in the enrollment in these courses? Is there disproportionality? How will you address any gaps? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) How are students who participated in Advanced Academics identified? Are Advance Academics students enrolled in these courses? Pathway Dual Credit/Dual Enrollment • How/when are students being encouraged to participate in pathway dual credit test options? • How representative is enrollment within Dual Credit/Dual enrollment of your student demographics? • What are some additional resources or supports that you will need/strategies you will use to address any gaps in successful performance? Are additional supports accessible to all students (e.g. Do
they require internet at home, etc.)? • How/when are students supported to complete the extra work to be successful in passing the challenge exam? • How are students recognized and celebrated within the academy/school for being pathway dual credit/dual enrollment students? • How do teachers help support the pathway teachers in prepping and mentoring dual credit/enrollment students? • How are pathways teachers monitored to see if they are following NSCC (or other post-secondary) resources? Is your school utilizing PLT time to help students prepare for pathway dual credit/dual enrollment exams? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) ACT What can be learned from previous year’s data? What percentage of students met the college readiness benchmark (Reading 22, English 18, Science 23, Math 22, & Composite 21)? What instructional strategies are in place for students who are not on track to meet the benchmark? How is the school using the College Readiness Rubric? Have students taken Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Algebra 1 and 2 in advance of ACT test? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings/gaps? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) Industry Certifications • How/when are students being encouraged to participate in industry certification test options? • How representative is participation and pass rates of your student demographics?
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 9
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
• What are some additional resources or supports that you will need/strategies you will use to address any gaps in pass rates? Are additional supports accessible to all students (i.e. Do they require
internet at home, etc.)? • How/when are students supported to complete the extra work to be successful in passing the certification exam? • How are students recognized and celebrated within the academy for being industry certification student? • How do teachers help support the pathway teachers in prepping and mentoring industry certification students? • How are pathways teachers monitored to see if they are utilizing certification resources? • Is your school utilizing PLT time to help students prepare for industry certification exams? Are students working with a business partner mentor to prepare for the exam? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) Chronic Absence Is chronic absence concentrated among particular students? Is it higher or lower among particular grades? What might explain some of these differences? What additional information is needed to identify barriers or effective strategies in place? Is chronic absence a sign of low levels of school outreach to and engagement of parents? Is chronic absence a sign of challenging social, health and/or economic conditions in the community? Does the level of need (reflected in the severity of absences) compare to availability of supports to improve attendance in your school? How do school disciplinary practices contribute to the chronic absence rate? What impact does absenteeism have on the schools’ overall climate? What other elements of climate (e.g. SEL, family engagement, discipline, tier I behavior approach) does the school need to pay attention to the most in order to impact improvement in chronic
absenteeism? Does the school provide increasingly intensive evidence based behavior interventions to meet student need? Has the school identified strategies to improve active student engagement? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) What impact is teacher attendance having on students, staff and climate of school? What supports can you put in place or assistance you’ve requested to address/determine root cause? Social Emotional Learning Has the school identified a Tier 1 approach to MTSS for behavior? Has the school identified an MTSS SEL/behavior lead? How is the effectiveness of your tier I behavior strategy being measured? Does the school’s master schedule allow for all students (including SWDs) to participate in a community gathering, restorative circle, or morning meeting? If a walk through has been completed, were the next steps implemented? Were additional supports put in place? How is the school using data analysis tools to guide practices around the work of SEL? How is the school using discipline data to drive work of the professional learning community at your school? With families/community? What impact does the current state of SEL (student and adult) have on our schools’ overall climate? What other elements of climate (e.g. family engagement, chronic absences, tier I behavior approach) does the school need to pay attention to the most in order to impact improvement in SEL and its
core competencies? Do the outcomes vary among subgroups? What does it look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your findings? (e.g. family meetings,
equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) Discipline Does the school have a school-wide classroom management strategy? Is instructional time lost, due to class disruptions that impede learning but not referred to administration, documented and communicated? If so, how? What professional development has been provided around classroom management and culture?
Last Revised: 11/08/17 Page 10
School Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Data Analysis Guidance
Does our school discipline policy and practice ensure students do not miss instruction due to unnecessary suspensions? What level of severity are the majority of discipline offenses? Are discipline offenses concentrated among particular subgroups? What do offenses look like for super-subgroups? What does the subgroup data tell you? What can you do to address your
findings? (e.g. family meetings, equity & diversity trainings for staff, classroom management) Are offenses high among particular grades? Are there outliers in behavior referral rates across faculty members? Are discipline responses consistent across the administration team? What impact does our approach and management of discipline have on the schools’ overall climate? What other elements of climate (e.g. SEL, family engagement, chronic absences, tier I behavior approach) does the school need to pay attention to the most in order to impact improvement in
discipline? Has the school identified a Tier 1 approach to MTSS for behavior and been trained in/provided training in that approach? Does the school provide evidence based behavior interventions to meet student need? Has the team considered a functional behavior assessment and a behavior intervention plan for a student with repeated behavior concerns? MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Support) Has the school identified two leads for coordination of MTSS within the school (academics and behavior), defined their roles, and communicated roles and responsibilities within the school? Has the school identified an MTSS Leadership Team and Data Teams, defined roles, and communicated team roles and responsibilities? How does the School MTSS Team and/or School Leadership Team monitor the percentages of students responding to core instruction; interventions; and enrichment, and make programmatic
decisions based on data analysis? What schedules, processes, and protocols ensure that MTSS Data Teams meet every five (5) weeks to review data and make academic and behavior decisions for students? What system is in place for documenting interventions and student progress and communicating with parents? Does the school’s master schedule allow for all students (including SWDs) to have access to core instruction in literacy and math; Personalized Learning Time; and a daily community gathering,
restorative circle, or morning meeting? What additional professional development is needed to support data-based decision-making and delivery of interventions? Has the school team analyzed discipline data to determine area of implementation weakness in the area of behavior? Has the team considered how many students are being referred to special day school? Has the team utilized the behavior consulting process before referring to special day school?
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
1 589 8055 Acad of Computer Sci CS Hunters Land 289 27.7 32.2 297 24.6 29.3 297 53.9 56.8
1 375 5 Alex Green ES NW Whites Creek 101 11.9 17.4 102 6.9 12.7
1 114 125 Bass Adult SW
1 116 126 Bass ALC SW Hillwood
1 117 725 Bass Transitions SW Hillwood
1 135 45 Bellshire ES NW Hunters Lane 203 11.8 17.3 204 11.3 16.8
1 165 70 Buena Vista ES NW Pearl-Cohn 85 14.1 19.5 86 11.6 17.1
1 215 120 Cockrill ES NW Pearl-Cohn 121 19.0 24.1 125 29.6 34.0
1 783 700 Creswell MS NW Whites Creek 408 18.6 23.7 408 11.0 16.6 408 29.4 33.8
1 240 150 Cumberland ES NW Whites Creek 185 10.8 16.4 184 4.9 10.8
1 152 7010 Davis ELC NE Whites Creek
1 400 305 Haynes MS NW Whites Creek 261 10.7 16.3 264 7.6 13.4 259 13.1 18.5
1 451 350 Hull-Jackson ES NW Pearl-Cohn 110 30.0 34.4 110 30.9 35.2
1 465 380 Joelton ES NW Whites Creek 97 37.1 41.0 97 39.2 43.0
1 470 385 Joelton MS NW Whites Creek 311 6.1 12.0 312 2.2 8.3 307 12.4 17.9
1 285 386 John Early MS NW Pearl-Cohn 347 19.3 24.3 361 15.2 20.5 356 27.0 31.6
1 485 387 Jones ES NW Pearl-Cohn 144 32.6 36.8 144 27.1 31.7
1 503 8042 KIPP College Prep CS Whites Creek 343 16.6 21.8 343 39.7 43.5 339 64.9 67.1
1 508 8003 LEAD Academy HS CS Pearl-Cohn 259 24.3 29.0 279 13.3 18.7
1 535 35 Moses McKissack MS NW Pearl-Cohn 324 8.0 13.8 323 11.5 17.0 326 18.7 23.8
1 211 614 Old Cockrill Acad SE Hillwood 0 0
1 652 8046 Purpose Prep CS Pearl-Cohn 82 68.3 70.3 82 42.7 46.3
1 660 8100 Republic HS CS Hunters Lane 301 34.9 39.0 281 13.5 18.9
1 784 618 Robert Churchwell ES NW Pearl-Cohn 162 15.4 20.7 163 15.3 20.6
1 500 420 Robert E. Lillard ES NW Whites Creek 152 12.5 18.0 152 11.2 16.8
1 667 8050 Rocketship TN CS Maplewood 195 20.0 25.0 195 20.5 25.5
1 787 704 Whites Creek HS NW Whites Creek 0 0 0 502 9.2 14.9 502 1.4 7.6
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 1
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
Acad of Computer Sci
Alex Green ES
Bass Adult
Bass ALC
Bass Transitions
Bellshire ES
Buena Vista ES
Cockrill ES
Creswell MS
Cumberland ES
Davis ELC
Haynes MS
Hull-Jackson ES
Joelton ES
Joelton MS
John Early MS
Jones ES
KIPP College Prep
LEAD Academy HS
Moses McKissack MS
Old Cockrill Acad
Purpose Prep
Republic HS
Robert Churchwell ES
Robert E. Lillard ES
Rocketship TN
Whites Creek HS
School Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
162 43.2 46.8 36 33.3 37.5 39 38.5 53.8 30.8 23.1 20.5 10.3 18.5 19.8 18.9 20.0 19.5 93.0%
0 43 14.0 19.4 39 15.4 28.2 5.1 17.9 7.7 2.6 15.5 16.1 16.9 16.3 16.4 56.9%
302 33.4 37.6
259 9.7 15.3 122 9.0 14.7 111 7.2 17.1 2.7 8.1 6.3 0.9 13.8 15.7 15.6 16.1 15.5 76.5%
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 2
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
Acad of Computer Sci
Alex Green ES
Bass Adult
Bass ALC
Bass Transitions
Bellshire ES
Buena Vista ES
Cockrill ES
Creswell MS
Cumberland ES
Davis ELC
Haynes MS
Hull-Jackson ES
Joelton ES
Joelton MS
John Early MS
Jones ES
KIPP College Prep
LEAD Academy HS
Moses McKissack MS
Old Cockrill Acad
Purpose Prep
Republic HS
Robert Churchwell ES
Robert E. Lillard ES
Rocketship TN
Whites Creek HS
School # Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
890 1.4 Level 5 -0.9 Level 2 0.0 Level 3 5.1 6.40
1186 -0.4 Level 3 2.6 Level 5 -1.8 Level 1 -2.1 -3.24
757 -5.1 Level 1 -1.5 Level 2 -6.9 Level 1 -7.1 -8.82
976 -5.8 Level 1 -4.9 Level 1 -7.1 Level 1 -5.5 -7.32
1022 -6.0 Level 1 -2.2 Level 1 -7.2 Level 1 -8.7 -11.89
1042 7.9 Level 5 2.7 Level 5 8.9 Level 5 12.2 17.53
1.3 Level 4 0.0 Level 3 -0.8 Level 3
957 -4.3 Level 1 -4.7 Level 1 -4.8 Level 1 -3.6 -4.95
-1.7 Level 3
-2.9 Level 1 -2.0 Level 1 -8.3 Level 1
-1.4 Level 1 -1.1 Level 2 -1.0 Level 2 -6.9 Level 1
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 3
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
Acad of Computer Sci
Alex Green ES
Bass Adult
Bass ALC
Bass Transitions
Bellshire ES
Buena Vista ES
Cockrill ES
Creswell MS
Cumberland ES
Davis ELC
Haynes MS
Hull-Jackson ES
Joelton ES
Joelton MS
John Early MS
Jones ES
KIPP College Prep
LEAD Academy HS
Moses McKissack MS
Old Cockrill Acad
Purpose Prep
Republic HS
Robert Churchwell ES
Robert E. Lillard ES
Rocketship TN
Whites Creek HS
School
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
5 2 3 3 5
-14.0 Level 1 3 5 1 3 1
1 2 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
-6.7 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 5 5 5 5
6.5 Level 5 5.0 Level 5 -7.0 Level 1 0.3 Level 3 3.2 Level 3 2.8 Level 5 5 4 5 5 3 5
-8.1 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1
-6.5 Level 1 1 3 3 1
-3.8 Level 2 -4.9 Level 1 -8.6 Level 1 -36.6 Level 1 -5.9 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-9.7 Level 1 -14.4 Level 1 -4.2 Level 2 -15.2 Level 1 -2.7 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 4
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
Acad of Computer Sci
Alex Green ES
Bass Adult
Bass ALC
Bass Transitions
Bellshire ES
Buena Vista ES
Cockrill ES
Creswell MS
Cumberland ES
Davis ELC
Haynes MS
Hull-Jackson ES
Joelton ES
Joelton MS
John Early MS
Jones ES
KIPP College Prep
LEAD Academy HS
Moses McKissack MS
Old Cockrill Acad
Purpose Prep
Republic HS
Robert Churchwell ES
Robert E. Lillard ES
Rocketship TN
Whites Creek HS
School # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
156 32.0 35.3% 25.0% 14.7% 16.0% 9.0% 25.0% 157 27.0 43.9% 21.0% 17.2% 12.1% 5.7% 17.8% 198 55.6%
201 25.0 45.3% 23.4% 14.4% 13.4% 3.5% 16.9% 201 18.0 55.7% 18.9% 11.9% 8.5% 5.0% 13.4% 246 45.1%
150 23.0 47.3% 22.7% 15.3% 12.0% 2.7% 14.7% 149 20.0 53.0% 18.8% 16.1% 7.4% 4.7% 12.1% 192 37.5%
194 26.5 43.8% 18.6% 20.6% 12.9% 4.1% 17.0% 194 23.0 47.9% 22.2% 18.0% 8.8% 3.1% 11.9% 252 40.1%
413 45.0 26.2% 21.1% 21.8% 23.2% 7.7% 31.0% 416 31.5 34.6% 27.4% 22.8% 12.0% 3.1% 15.1%
234 23.0 45.3% 26.1% 14.1% 11.5% 3.0% 14.5% 234 16.0 58.1% 25.6% 10.7% 3.8% 1.7% 5.6% 278 44.2%
224 20.0 50.4% 22.3% 15.2% 9.4% 2.7% 12.1% 227 19.0 53.7% 27.3% 11.9% 6.2% 0.9% 7.0%
174 40.0 26.4% 24.1% 24.1% 16.7% 8.6% 25.3% 174 38.0 30.5% 24.7% 16.7% 19.0% 9.2% 28.2% 231 68.4%
135 56.0 17.0% 20.0% 20.0% 23.0% 20.0% 43.0% 137 53.0 17.5% 19.0% 21.2% 24.8% 17.5% 42.3% 188 58.0%
290 17.5 52.4% 19.3% 17.2% 8.6% 2.4% 11.0% 292 12.5 62.7% 17.5% 15.1% 3.4% 1.4% 4.8%
318 21.5 49.1% 17.6% 10.7% 11.3% 11.3% 22.6% 328 15.0 57.6% 17.1% 8.8% 8.5% 7.9% 16.5%
188 58.0 14.9% 12.2% 23.4% 31.4% 18.1% 49.5% 188 43.5 22.3% 23.4% 22.9% 21.8% 9.6% 31.4% 238 80.7%
294 24.0 44.9% 29.3% 14.3% 10.2% 1.4% 11.6% 290 18.0 53.1% 20.7% 17.9% 6.9% 1.4% 8.3%
202 33.0 33.2% 22.8% 19.8% 18.8% 5.4% 24.3% 196 30.0 39.3% 24.0% 20.4% 12.2% 4.1% 16.3% 272 52.6%
195 24.0 45.6% 21.0% 17.4% 8.7% 7.2% 15.9% 197 18.0 52.8% 20.3% 13.7% 11.2% 2.0% 13.2% 241 55.2%
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 5
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2 225 130 Cole ES SE Cane Ridge 348 16.7 21.9 349 24.4 29.1
2 235 145 Crieve Hall ES SW Overton 150 50.0 53.1 152 63.8 66.1
2 370 290 Granbery ES SW Overton 283 51.9 54.9 285 51.9 54.9
2 405 310 Haywood ES SW Overton 291 17.5 22.7 290 23.4 28.2
2 615 395 John Overton HS SW Overton 0 0 0 1268 22.9 27.7 1410 9.8 15.4
2 682 608 May Werthan Shayne ES SW Overton 287 47.0 50.3 288 56.9 59.6
2 540 480 McMurray MS SW Overton 750 9.5 15.2 760 13.9 19.3 755 16.8 22.0
2 725 645 Tusculum ES SW Overton 242 10.7 16.3 244 16.4 21.6
2 743 8045 Valor Flagship Acad CS Overton 362 69.1 71.0 362 73.5 75.2 364 91.8 92.3
2 744 8080 Valor Voyager CS Overton 361 47.4 50.7 361 59.0 61.6 361 83.9 84.9
2 612 538 William Henry Oliver MS SW Overton 805 30.7 35.0 810 27.5 32.0 809 54.1 57.0
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 6
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Cole ES
Crieve Hall ES
Granbery ES
Haywood ES
John Overton HS
May Werthan Shayne ES
McMurray MS
Tusculum ES
Valor Flagship Acad
Valor Voyager
William Henry Oliver MS
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
898 27.7 32.2 325 24.3 29.0 373 28.4 42.1 16.4 27.1 19.3 8.8 17.3 18.0 18.5 19.0 18.4 85.6%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 7
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Cole ES
Crieve Hall ES
Granbery ES
Haywood ES
John Overton HS
May Werthan Shayne ES
McMurray MS
Tusculum ES
Valor Flagship Acad
Valor Voyager
William Henry Oliver MS
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
-0.1 Level 3 0.4 Level 4 0.0 Level 3 -4.3 Level 1
2441 -1.9 Level 1 0.4 Level 3 -2.5 Level 1 -3.3 -7.13
1088 10.4 Level 5 6.3 Level 5 10.2 Level 5 14.7 22.89
1070 11.0 Level 5 5.1 Level 5 9.9 Level 5 17.9 28.57
2419 -1.4 Level 1 -2.1 Level 1 -2.7 Level 1 0.4 0.90
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 8
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Cole ES
Crieve Hall ES
Granbery ES
Haywood ES
John Overton HS
May Werthan Shayne ES
McMurray MS
Tusculum ES
Valor Flagship Acad
Valor Voyager
William Henry Oliver MS
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
-3.4 Level 1 -7.9 Level 1 -4.6 Level 1 -9.6 Level 1 1.2 Level 5 1 3 1 1 1 5
-9.9 Level 1 1 3 1 1 1
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5.4 Level 4 1 1 1 1 3
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 9
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Cole ES
Crieve Hall ES
Granbery ES
Haywood ES
John Overton HS
May Werthan Shayne ES
McMurray MS
Tusculum ES
Valor Flagship Acad
Valor Voyager
William Henry Oliver MS
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
413 27.0 42.4% 22.5% 16.2% 13.1% 5.8% 18.9% 410 27.0 42.7% 25.1% 17.8% 10.5% 3.9% 14.4% 559 33.3%
257 60.0 19.5% 11.7% 19.5% 21.4% 28.0% 49.4% 257 58.0 19.1% 12.1% 23.7% 21.8% 23.3% 45.1% 358 73.7%
437 63.0 15.6% 14.0% 16.9% 22.4% 31.1% 53.5% 436 58.5 20.6% 15.6% 16.5% 20.6% 26.6% 47.2% 582 70.1%
337 27.0 44.2% 22.3% 16.9% 11.9% 4.7% 16.6% 348 24.5 48.0% 19.5% 15.5% 12.6% 4.3% 17.0% 505 44.8%
426 56.0 20.0% 15.0% 20.0% 20.9% 24.2% 45.1% 428 50.0 22.9% 17.3% 21.3% 18.9% 19.6% 38.6% 577 60.8%
690 18.0 53.0% 17.5% 15.2% 10.7% 3.5% 14.2% 606 18.5 53.3% 22.8% 14.0% 7.4% 2.5% 9.9%
414 19.0 51.4% 19.3% 16.2% 7.5% 5.6% 13.0% 414 18.0 52.4% 19.8% 14.3% 9.9% 3.6% 13.5% 544 34.4%
869 61.0 15.2% 14.3% 20.5% 28.3% 21.7% 50.1% 870 47.0 19.7% 22.3% 24.4% 20.9% 12.8% 33.7%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 10
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
3 105 10 Amqui ES NW Hunters Lane 209 7.7 13.5 215 13.5 18.9
3 200 105 Chadwell ES NE Maplewood 130 23.1 27.9 128 21.1 26.0
3 560 160 Dan Mills ES NE Stratford 190 45.3 48.7 191 45.0 48.4
3 315 235 Gateway ES NW Hunters Lane 109 24.8 29.5 110 19.1 24.2
3 350 270 Goodlettsville ES NW Hunters Lane 134 30.6 34.9 134 34.3 38.4
3 355 275 Goodlettsville MS NW Hunters Lane 502 12.0 17.5 504 8.9 14.6 503 32.0 36.3
3 365 285 Gra-Mar MS NE Maplewood 336 7.7 13.5 338 13.9 19.3 336 19.9 24.9
3 452 358 Hunters Lane HS NW Hunters Lane 0 1025 14.8 20.1 1044 4.1 10.1
3 510 365 Isaac Litton MS NE Stratford 460 18.7 23.8 464 16.6 21.8 463 43.6 47.1
3 120 375 Jere Baxter MS NE Maplewood 289 5.9 11.8 288 8.3 14.0 286 19.9 24.9
3 501 8085 KIPP ES CS Maplewood
3 545 622 Madison MS NW Hunters Lane 507 7.9 13.7 506 6.7 12.5 515 20.6 25.6
3 550 445 Maplewood HS NE Maplewood 633 5.4 11.3 615 2.0 8.1
3 595 515 Neelys Bend ES NW Hunters Lane 161 13.0 18.4 160 20.0 25.0
3 600 520 Neelys Bend MS 220 14.1 19.5 220 7.7 13.5 220 15.5 20.8
3 610 535 Old Center ES NW Hunters Lane 120 24.2 28.9 119 25.2 29.9
3 687 8001 Smithson-Craighd Acad CS Hunters Lane 83 10.8 16.4 83 14.5 19.8
3 710 625 Stratton ES NW Hunters Lane 223 19.3 24.3 224 28.1 32.6
3 495 635 Tom Joy ES NE Maplewood 155 10.3 15.9 157 3.2 9.3
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 11
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Amqui ES
Chadwell ES
Dan Mills ES
Gateway ES
Goodlettsville ES
Goodlettsville MS
Gra-Mar MS
Hunters Lane HS
Isaac Litton MS
Jere Baxter MS
KIPP ES
Madison MS
Maplewood HS
Neelys Bend ES
Neelys Bend MS
Old Center ES
Smithson-Craighd Acad
Stratton ES
Tom Joy ES
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
504 39.5 43.3 289 14.2 19.6 280 15.0 31.1 8.6 15.4 9.3 4.3 15.6 16.3 16.4 17.0 16.5 80.3%
394 9.9 15.5 131 6.1 12.0 192 6.8 21.9 3.6 11.5 7.3 1.6 14.5 16.0 16.2 16.7 16.0 78.6%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 12
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Amqui ES
Chadwell ES
Dan Mills ES
Gateway ES
Goodlettsville ES
Goodlettsville MS
Gra-Mar MS
Hunters Lane HS
Isaac Litton MS
Jere Baxter MS
KIPP ES
Madison MS
Maplewood HS
Neelys Bend ES
Neelys Bend MS
Old Center ES
Smithson-Craighd Acad
Stratton ES
Tom Joy ES
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
1529 -3.1 Level 1 -2.3 Level 1 -4.9 Level 1 -2.2 -3.78
1037 -2.4 Level 1 -4.2 Level 1 0.1 Level 3 -3.0 -4.11
-0.3 Level 3 -0.3 Level 3 0.3 Level 3 -2.3 Level 1
1365 -4.1 Level 1 -3.1 Level 1 -6.2 Level 1 -3.0 -4.89
876 -6.5 Level 1 -4.3 Level 1 -9.7 Level 1 -5.4 -6.68
1619 -2.7 Level 1 -2.8 Level 1 -3.7 Level 1 -1.8 -3.17
-3.7 Level 1 -1.4 Level 1 -1.7 Level 1 -10.4 Level 1
671 -3.1 Level 1 3.2 Level 5 -3.1 Level 1 -9.3 -11.02
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 13
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Amqui ES
Chadwell ES
Dan Mills ES
Gateway ES
Goodlettsville ES
Goodlettsville MS
Gra-Mar MS
Hunters Lane HS
Isaac Litton MS
Jere Baxter MS
KIPP ES
Madison MS
Maplewood HS
Neelys Bend ES
Neelys Bend MS
Old Center ES
Smithson-Craighd Acad
Stratton ES
Tom Joy ES
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
-11.6 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 3 1 1
-5.4 Level 1 -7.3 Level 1 -1.4 Level 3 30.7 Level 5 2.4 Level 5 3 3 1 1 5 5
-15.6 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
-2.4 Level 3 1 1 1 1 1
-3.4 Level 2 -12.5 Level 1 -14.5 Level 1 -8.7 Level 1 -31.9 Level 1 -6.8 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 5 1 3 1
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 14
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Amqui ES
Chadwell ES
Dan Mills ES
Gateway ES
Goodlettsville ES
Goodlettsville MS
Gra-Mar MS
Hunters Lane HS
Isaac Litton MS
Jere Baxter MS
KIPP ES
Madison MS
Maplewood HS
Neelys Bend ES
Neelys Bend MS
Old Center ES
Smithson-Craighd Acad
Stratton ES
Tom Joy ES
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
247 15.0 56.3% 24.3% 10.1% 6.9% 2.4% 9.3% 257 13.0 61.1% 16.3% 16.0% 3.5% 3.1% 6.6% 387 45.7%
197 33.0 33.0% 24.4% 16.8% 16.8% 9.1% 25.9% 194 27.0 45.9% 17.5% 21.1% 13.4% 2.1% 15.5% 236 63.6%
278 67.0 16.2% 12.2% 16.2% 18.0% 37.4% 55.4% 278 61.5 18.7% 15.8% 15.1% 25.5% 24.8% 50.4% 398 76.9%
181 26.0 37.6% 26.5% 12.2% 14.9% 8.8% 23.8% 180 24.0 46.1% 21.7% 16.7% 8.3% 7.2% 15.6% 227 36.6%
179 51.0 26.8% 14.0% 19.6% 21.2% 18.4% 39.7% 184 40.5 29.9% 20.1% 17.4% 26.1% 6.5% 32.6% 252 55.2%
553 37.0 34.2% 20.8% 21.3% 15.6% 8.1% 23.7% 556 23.0 46.8% 24.8% 15.8% 9.2% 3.4% 12.6%
306 16.5 56.2% 16.7% 15.0% 8.2% 3.9% 12.1% 304 12.0 62.8% 21.1% 10.9% 4.3% 1.0% 5.3%
476 45.0 27.9% 19.5% 17.6% 18.9% 16.0% 34.9% 478 31.0 36.6% 24.9% 17.4% 13.2% 7.9% 21.1%
278 13.5 59.4% 18.7% 14.7% 5.0% 2.2% 7.2% 280 11.0 69.3% 21.4% 5.7% 2.5% 1.1% 3.6%
505 20.0 50.7% 18.8% 14.9% 12.5% 3.2% 15.6% 495 16.0 55.8% 23.2% 11.3% 8.3% 1.4% 9.7%
213 34.0 38.0% 20.2% 20.2% 13.6% 8.0% 21.6% 213 27.0 43.2% 23.5% 16.9% 11.7% 4.7% 16.4% 268 49.6%
183 42.0 26.2% 18.6% 25.1% 19.7% 10.4% 30.1% 183 41.0 26.8% 22.4% 24.0% 18.0% 8.7% 26.8% 239 55.6%
321 27.0 41.7% 23.1% 16.2% 13.1% 5.9% 19.0% 320 22.0 48.1% 24.7% 16.3% 8.4% 2.5% 10.9% 408 47.1%
222 18.5 52.3% 22.5% 14.0% 9.9% 1.4% 11.3% 222 14.0 62.2% 17.6% 13.1% 5.4% 1.8% 7.2% 303 33.7%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 15
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
4 460 15 Andrew Jackson ES NE McGavock 214 41.6 45.3 214 29.0 33.4
4 252 165 Dodson ES NE McGavock 176 19.3 24.3 176 28.4 32.9
4 260 175 Donelson MS NE McGavock 707 18.1 23.2 706 15.4 20.7 704 29.0 33.4 0
4 265 180 Dupont ES NE McGavock 158 27.2 31.8 158 22.8 27.6
4 270 190 Dupont-Hadley MS NE McGavock 599 24.2 28.9 599 27.0 31.6 598 61.0 63.4
4 275 185 Dupont-Tyler MS NE McGavock 553 16.3 21.5 562 12.8 18.3 550 28.9 33.3
4 415 320 Hermitage ES NE McGavock 118 26.3 30.9 118 28.0 32.5
4 420 327 Hickman ES NE McGavock 220 24.5 29.2 219 23.3 28.1
4 100 450 Margaret Allen MS SE Antioch 431 15.5 20.8 433 10.6 16.2 427 25.5 30.2
4 530 465 McGavock ES NE McGavock 101 13.9 19.3 101 20.8 25.8
4 532 470 McGavock HS NE McGavock 0 0 0 1607 28.4 32.9 1502 8.7 14.4
4 613 612 Opry Mills Acad SE McGavock 0 0
4 640 565 Pennington ES NE McGavock 122 28.7 33.2 123 22.8 27.6
4 522 607 Ruby Major ES NE McGavock 216 31.5 35.8 216 37.5 41.4
4 690 615 Stanford ES NE McGavock 105 50.5 53.6 108 42.6 46.2
4 712 8090 STRIVE Collegiate Acad CS McGavock 183 27.3 31.8 183 28.4 32.9 181 59.7 62.2
4 717 637 Tulip Grove ES NE McGavock 203 24.1 28.8 203 27.6 32.1
4 730 650 Two Rivers MS NE McGavock 444 18.5 23.6 447 12.8 18.3 442 34.8 38.9
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 16
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Andrew Jackson ES
Dodson ES
Donelson MS
Dupont ES
Dupont-Hadley MS
Dupont-Tyler MS
Hermitage ES
Hickman ES
Margaret Allen MS
McGavock ES
McGavock HS
Opry Mills Acad
Pennington ES
Ruby Major ES
Stanford ES
STRIVE Collegiate Acad
Tulip Grove ES
Two Rivers MS
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
1055 37.1 41.0 348 29.6 34.0 379 29.6 45.9 17.9 32.7 21.1 10.6 17.8 17.6 19.4 18.8 18.5 77.9%
0 33 27.3 31.8 43 16.3 34.9 7.0 25.6 9.3 0.0 16.5 16.8 17.6 18.0 17.3 64.1%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 17
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Andrew Jackson ES
Dodson ES
Donelson MS
Dupont ES
Dupont-Hadley MS
Dupont-Tyler MS
Hermitage ES
Hickman ES
Margaret Allen MS
McGavock ES
McGavock HS
Opry Mills Acad
Pennington ES
Ruby Major ES
Stanford ES
STRIVE Collegiate Acad
Tulip Grove ES
Two Rivers MS
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
2168 -1.6 Level 1 -0.8 Level 2 -0.7 Level 2 -3.2 -6.81
1778 0.1 Level 3 -2.0 Level 1 -1.8 Level 1 3.9 7.49
1698 -3.3 Level 1 -1.9 Level 1 -3.1 Level 1 -4.8 -8.56
1303 -2.2 Level 1 0.8 Level 4 -6.3 Level 1 -1.4 -2.18
1.7 Level 5 1.4 Level 5 0.8 Level 5 -7.0 Level 1
547 5.8 Level 5 4.2 Level 5 4.6 Level 5 8.5 9.58
1347 -2.0 Level 1 -0.7 Level 2 -5.9 Level 1 0.5 0.85
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 18
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Andrew Jackson ES
Dodson ES
Donelson MS
Dupont ES
Dupont-Hadley MS
Dupont-Tyler MS
Hermitage ES
Hickman ES
Margaret Allen MS
McGavock ES
McGavock HS
Opry Mills Acad
Pennington ES
Ruby Major ES
Stanford ES
STRIVE Collegiate Acad
Tulip Grove ES
Two Rivers MS
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
0.0 Level 3 1 2 2 2 1
6.8 Level 4 3 1 1 1 5
-10.5 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1
-7.6 Level 1 1 4 1 1 1
-3.0 Level 2 1.8 Level 4 -5.6 Level 1 5.0 Level 5 -4.2 Level 1 0.7 Level 4 4 5 1 3 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
-3.3 Level 3 1 2 1 1 3
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 19
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Andrew Jackson ES
Dodson ES
Donelson MS
Dupont ES
Dupont-Hadley MS
Dupont-Tyler MS
Hermitage ES
Hickman ES
Margaret Allen MS
McGavock ES
McGavock HS
Opry Mills Acad
Pennington ES
Ruby Major ES
Stanford ES
STRIVE Collegiate Acad
Tulip Grove ES
Two Rivers MS
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
289 61.0 15.9% 10.4% 22.5% 24.9% 26.3% 51.2% 291 52.0 18.2% 20.3% 22.3% 25.4% 13.7% 39.2% 405 77.3%
226 37.0 33.6% 20.8% 19.9% 15.9% 9.7% 25.7% 227 29.0 38.8% 23.8% 16.3% 14.1% 7.0% 21.1% 308 45.1%
719 37.0 33.4% 20.9% 16.1% 17.7% 12.0% 29.6% 698 25.0 47.1% 19.6% 16.6% 11.7% 4.9% 16.6%
205 40.0 30.7% 21.0% 20.0% 16.6% 11.7% 28.3% 208 34.0 32.7% 24.0% 24.0% 12.5% 6.7% 19.2% 275 58.2%
631 51.0 24.7% 15.5% 18.7% 24.1% 17.0% 41.0% 636 36.5 32.7% 22.2% 19.7% 18.1% 7.4% 25.5%
481 35.0 34.9% 22.5% 19.8% 14.6% 8.3% 22.9% 516 27.0 43.6% 22.7% 20.3% 12.0% 1.4% 13.4%
174 53.0 20.7% 17.2% 21.8% 20.7% 19.5% 40.2% 174 43.0 29.3% 17.8% 23.6% 16.7% 12.6% 29.3% 237 66.7%
278 46.0 29.5% 17.6% 15.5% 23.0% 14.4% 37.4% 278 38.0 34.5% 21.2% 16.9% 16.5% 10.8% 27.3% 370 57.8%
412 29.5 38.8% 21.4% 17.0% 17.0% 5.8% 22.8% 419 19.0 51.6% 21.0% 16.5% 6.9% 4.1% 11.0%
129 43.0 33.3% 14.0% 22.5% 20.9% 9.3% 30.2% 130 32.0 33.8% 27.7% 16.9% 13.8% 7.7% 21.5% 196 55.6%
168 47.5 30.4% 14.3% 16.7% 16.1% 22.6% 38.7% 166 41.0 28.9% 19.3% 18.1% 21.1% 12.7% 33.7% 225 57.3%
322 49.0 22.7% 19.9% 16.1% 18.9% 22.4% 41.3% 321 38.0 32.7% 19.6% 17.1% 17.4% 13.1% 30.5% 440 62.3%
166 65.0 8.4% 16.3% 21.7% 28.9% 24.7% 53.6% 166 51.5 20.5% 18.7% 25.3% 14.5% 21.1% 35.5% 225 81.8%
293 45.0 28.7% 18.8% 17.4% 19.8% 15.4% 35.2% 295 37.0 31.5% 23.4% 21.4% 15.3% 8.5% 23.7% 402 58.7%
360 33.0 36.9% 19.4% 17.5% 17.8% 8.3% 26.1% 354 19.0 52.3% 19.8% 13.3% 11.9% 2.8% 14.7%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 20
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
5 175 80 Caldwell ES NE Maplewood 82 14.6 19.9 84 8.3 14.0
5 181 8010 Cameron College Prep CS Glencliff 611 13.6 19.0 617 15.7 21.0 616 52.3 55.3
5 185 670 Carter-Lawrence ES NW Pearl-Cohn 132 21.2 26.1 132 25.0 29.7
5 448 443 Cora Howe School SW Hillsboro 37 8.1 13.8 37 10.8 16.4 30 10.0 15.6 0 0
5 286 8009 East End Prep CS Stratford 300 41.0 44.7 301 63.8 66.1 94 88.3 89.0
5 290 203 East Nashville Magnet NE Stratford 0 549 20.6 25.6 551 4.7 10.7
5 296 296 East Nashville MS NE Stratford 442 14.7 20.0 441 14.7 20.0 441 24.0 28.8
5 308 220 Fall-Hamilton ES SE Glencliff 91 14.3 19.7 91 20.9 25.8
5 340 260 Glenn ES NE Maplewood 62 14.5 19.8 63 25.4 30.1
5 230 140 Hattie Cotton ES NE Maplewood 106 21.7 26.6 105 15.2 20.5
5 410 315 Head MS NW Pearl-Cohn 540 45.2 48.6 541 58.0 60.6 541 71.0 72.8
5 450 355 Hume-Fogg Magnet NW Pearl-Cohn 643 87.6 88.4 609 83.3 84.3
5 455 360 Inglewood ES NE Stratford 69 21.7 26.6 69 13.0 18.4
5 480 740 Johnson ALC SW Glencliff
5 499 8095 KIPP Academy ES CS Stratford
5 502 8002 KIPP Academy MS CS Maplewood 361 36.8 40.8 361 56.2 58.9 361 80.6 81.8
5 504 8011 KIPP Collegiate HS CS Maplewood 244 34.8 38.9 258 37.2 41.1
5 505 425 Kirkpatrick ES 97 5.2 11.1 98 3.1 9.2
5 517 8005 Liberty Collegiate Acad CS Maplewood 449 30.5 34.8 451 44.3 47.8 450 70.9 72.7
5 520 435 Lockeland ES NE Stratford 122 77.9 79.3 122 85.2 86.1
5 497 456 M.L. King Jr Magnet NW Pearl-Cohn 255 78.0 79.4 256 83.6 84.6 257 96.1 96.3 718 81.9 83.0 683 73.5 75.2
5 555 330 Meigs MS NW Pearl-Cohn 689 81.1 82.3 689 79.7 81.0 689 90.9 91.5
5 585 505 Murrell School SW Hillsboro 53 3.8 9.8 55 1.8 7.9 36 2.8 8.9
5 590 510 Napier ES NE McGavock 121 4.1 10.1 122 3.3 9.3
5 242 512 Nashv School of Arts NW Whites Creek 412 50.0 53.1 417 21.1 26.0
5 592 8044 Nashville Prep CS Stratford 73 67.1 69.2 73 54.8 57.6
5 594 8008 Nashville Prep CS Pearl-Cohn 368 25.3 30.0 373 28.4 32.9 373 48.5 51.7
5 620 545 Park Avenue ES NW Pearl-Cohn 157 13.4 18.8 156 28.8 33.3
5 632 555 Pearl-Cohn HS NW Pearl-Cohn 0 0 0 456 6.8 12.6 427 3.5 9.5
5 675 595 Rose Park MS NW Pearl-Cohn 430 50.9 54.0 430 47.7 51.0 430 79.1 80.4
5 670 600 Rosebank ES NE Stratford 86 18.6 23.7 86 8.1 13.8
5 681 7015 Ross ELC NE Stratford
5 685 610 Shwab ES NE Maplewood 104 12.5 18.0 108 12.0 17.5
5 695 8006 STEM Prep Academy CS Glencliff 515 30.7 35.0 517 46.0 49.4 518 68.9 70.8
5 696 8075 STEM Prep HS CS Glencliff 242 47.1 50.4 243 42.0 45.6
5 705 620 Stratford HS NE Stratford 371 8.6 14.3 376 6.6 12.4 374 13.9 19.3 467 11.6 17.1 444 1.6 7.8
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 21
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Caldwell ES
Cameron College Prep
Carter-Lawrence ES
Cora Howe School
East End Prep
East Nashville Magnet
East Nashville MS
Fall-Hamilton ES
Glenn ES
Hattie Cotton ES
Head MS
Hume-Fogg Magnet
Inglewood ES
Johnson ALC
KIPP Academy ES
KIPP Academy MS
KIPP Collegiate HS
Kirkpatrick ES
Liberty Collegiate Acad
Lockeland ES
M.L. King Jr Magnet
Meigs MS
Murrell School
Napier ES
Nashv School of Arts
Nashville Prep
Nashville Prep
Park Avenue ES
Pearl-Cohn HS
Rose Park MS
Rosebank ES
Ross ELC
Shwab ES
STEM Prep Academy
STEM Prep HS
Stratford HS
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
0 0 9 0.0 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 14.9 14.4 13.8 14.1 62.5%
293 45.7 49.1 149 26.2 30.8 147 18.4 38.1 12.2 23.8 8.8 4.1 16.8 17.7 17.7 18.6 17.8 99.3%
446 91.0 91.6 220 98.2 98.3 225 98.2 98.7 90.7 92.9 85.8 78.7 28.5 26.8 29.2 27.4 28.1 99.6%
0 12.5%
142 64.8 67.0
441 87.3 88.1 192 96.4 96.6 236 94.9 95.3 87.3 85.2 71.2 60.6 25.9 25.8 27.0 25.3 26.1 98.3%
290 40.7 44.4 137 53.3 56.2 135 57.0 80.7 27.4 57.0 42.2 21.5 22.9 19.3 23.2 21.3 21.8 98.6%
246 15.9 21.2 137 4.4 10.4 125 10.4 15.2 5.6 10.4 5.6 1.6 14.4 16.0 15.8 16.9 16.0 79.7%
243 63.4 65.7
253 14.2 19.6 127 22.8 27.6 136 14.0 28.7 8.1 16.2 9.6 4.4 15.6 16.5 17.0 17.2 16.7 78.2%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 22
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Caldwell ES
Cameron College Prep
Carter-Lawrence ES
Cora Howe School
East End Prep
East Nashville Magnet
East Nashville MS
Fall-Hamilton ES
Glenn ES
Hattie Cotton ES
Head MS
Hume-Fogg Magnet
Inglewood ES
Johnson ALC
KIPP Academy ES
KIPP Academy MS
KIPP Collegiate HS
Kirkpatrick ES
Liberty Collegiate Acad
Lockeland ES
M.L. King Jr Magnet
Meigs MS
Murrell School
Napier ES
Nashv School of Arts
Nashville Prep
Nashville Prep
Park Avenue ES
Pearl-Cohn HS
Rose Park MS
Rosebank ES
Ross ELC
Shwab ES
STEM Prep Academy
STEM Prep HS
Stratford HS
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
1916 4.4 Level 5 4.3 Level 5 0.4 Level 3 8.3 16.62
25 0.0 Level 3 -3.4 Level 3 15.3 Level 5 -10.5 -2.23
282 7.6 Level 5 4.9 Level 5 10.3 Level 5 7.6 5.35
3.5 Level 5 2.7 Level 5 -0.4 Level 3 -7.2 Level 1
1289 -3.7 Level 1 -0.9 Level 2 -3.7 Level 1 -6.7 -10.80
1600 4.9 Level 5 2.7 Level 5 8.1 Level 5 3.9 7.18
1.3 Level 5 3.2 Level 5 2.4 Level 5 4.8 Level 5
1078 10.1 Level 5 6.3 Level 5 10.8 Level 5 13.0 18.36
0.4 Level 3 1.5 Level 4 1.1 Level 4 15.5 Level 5 6.3 Level 5
1355 3.3 Level 5 3.4 Level 5 2.5 Level 5 4.0 6.61
691 2.8 Level 5 0.2 Level 3 5.5 Level 5 3.4 4.59 3.7 Level 5 2.2 Level 5 1.2 Level 4 4.7 Level 5
1952 2.3 Level 5 3.4 Level 5 6.7 Level 5 -2.3 -4.89
104 -1.1 Level 3 -5.4 Level 2 7.0 Level 5 -4.9 -1.71
0.3 Level 3 0.3 Level 3 2.7 Level 5 -2.6 Level 2
1128 -1.7 Level 1 0.5 Level 3 -1.5 Level 1 -4.1 -6.24
0.4 Level 3 -0.3 Level 3 -0.6 Level 2 -4.1 Level 1
1262 4.2 Level 5 3.8 Level 5 1.7 Level 5 7.0 10.85
1441 9.7 Level 5 7.9 Level 5 11.5 Level 5 10.0 17.30
7.8 Level 5 1.7 Level 5 -3.0 Level 2
1137 -6.1 Level 1 -3.6 Level 1 -7.0 Level 1 -7.6 -10.77 -2.1 Level 1 -1.8 Level 1 -2.0 Level 1 -11.6 Level 1
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 23
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Caldwell ES
Cameron College Prep
Carter-Lawrence ES
Cora Howe School
East End Prep
East Nashville Magnet
East Nashville MS
Fall-Hamilton ES
Glenn ES
Hattie Cotton ES
Head MS
Hume-Fogg Magnet
Inglewood ES
Johnson ALC
KIPP Academy ES
KIPP Academy MS
KIPP Collegiate HS
Kirkpatrick ES
Liberty Collegiate Acad
Lockeland ES
M.L. King Jr Magnet
Meigs MS
Murrell School
Napier ES
Nashv School of Arts
Nashville Prep
Nashville Prep
Park Avenue ES
Pearl-Cohn HS
Rose Park MS
Rosebank ES
Ross ELC
Shwab ES
STEM Prep Academy
STEM Prep HS
Stratford HS
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
4.2 Level 4 5 5 3 5 5
-15.2 Level 1 2 3 3 3 1
5 5 5 5 5
-5.4 Level 1 -10.0 Level 1 6.6 Level 5 -6.9 Level 2 1.9 Level 5 5 5 1 3 5 5
-6.5 Level 2 1 2 1 1 1
11.0 Level 5 5 5 5 5 5
11.6 Level 5 11.7 Level 5 6.9 Level 5 10.5 Level 5 0.4 Level 3 5 5 5 5 5 3
5 5 5 5 5
7.1 Level 5 9.0 Level 5 11.9 Level 5 -1.9 Level 3 5 4 5 5 5 3
5 5 5 5 5
11.1 Level 5 8.8 Level 5 5.6 Level 5 5.8 Level 5 -0.3 Level 3 5 5 5 5 5 3
15.7 Level 5 24.3 Level 5 5 5 5 5 1
3 2 5 3 2
-5.1 Level 1 -1.9 Level 3 -5.9 Level 1 -12.7 Level 1 1.6 Level 4 1 4 1 3 1 4
1 3 1 3 1
6.7 Level 5 4.9 Level 5 -11.4 Level 1 3.2 Level 4 -22.1 Level 1 0.4 Level 3 1 3 1 1 2 3
1.6 Level 3 5 5 5 5 5
5.1 Level 5 5 5 5 5 5
12.8 Level 5 9.4 Level 5 11.9 Level 5 4.4 Level 4 -0.1 Level 3 5 5 5 5 5 3
-2.1 Level 2 -10.2 Level 1 -5.6 Level 1 -19.0 Level 1 -6.4 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 24
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Caldwell ES
Cameron College Prep
Carter-Lawrence ES
Cora Howe School
East End Prep
East Nashville Magnet
East Nashville MS
Fall-Hamilton ES
Glenn ES
Hattie Cotton ES
Head MS
Hume-Fogg Magnet
Inglewood ES
Johnson ALC
KIPP Academy ES
KIPP Academy MS
KIPP Collegiate HS
Kirkpatrick ES
Liberty Collegiate Acad
Lockeland ES
M.L. King Jr Magnet
Meigs MS
Murrell School
Napier ES
Nashv School of Arts
Nashville Prep
Nashville Prep
Park Avenue ES
Pearl-Cohn HS
Rose Park MS
Rosebank ES
Ross ELC
Shwab ES
STEM Prep Academy
STEM Prep HS
Stratford HS
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
148 21.0 49.3% 23.0% 14.2% 11.5% 2.0% 13.5% 146 18.0 54.8% 19.9% 19.2% 5.5% 0.7% 6.2% 183 42.6%
177 43.0 26.0% 18.1% 16.9% 24.9% 14.1% 39.0% 178 38.0 35.4% 20.2% 21.3% 13.5% 9.6% 23.0% 228 62.3%
25 16.0 60.0% 20.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.0% 16.0% 28 4.5 75.0% 7.1% 14.3% 3.6% 0.0% 3.6%
420 35.0 35.0% 20.7% 20.7% 16.0% 7.6% 23.6% 427 25.0 44.5% 24.6% 16.9% 11.0% 3.0% 14.1%
125 35.0 38.4% 18.4% 20.8% 17.6% 4.8% 22.4% 125 24.0 45.6% 20.8% 19.2% 10.4% 4.0% 14.4% 183 65.0%
91 33.0 35.2% 24.2% 19.8% 14.3% 6.6% 20.9% 92 24.5 48.9% 18.5% 18.5% 8.7% 5.4% 14.1% 126 38.9%
162 29.5 38.3% 22.2% 16.7% 16.7% 6.2% 22.8% 157 25.0 45.2% 24.8% 15.9% 8.3% 5.7% 14.0% 209 50.7%
583 67.0 6.7% 11.7% 24.7% 26.4% 30.5% 56.9% 581 59.0 10.5% 15.7% 24.4% 27.9% 21.5% 49.4%
98 25.0 40.8% 22.4% 15.3% 13.3% 8.2% 21.4% 97 34.0 30.9% 26.8% 29.9% 8.2% 4.1% 12.4% 144 59.0%
19 15.0 73.7% 10.5% 10.5% 0.0% 5.3% 5.3% 21 12.0 61.9% 28.6% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% 4.8%
184 84.5 7.1% 8.2% 12.0% 18.5% 54.3% 72.8% 184 76.5 7.1% 6.5% 19.0% 26.1% 41.3% 67.4% 243 83.1%
265 81.0 1.9% 3.4% 9.4% 33.6% 51.7% 85.3% 253 79.0 0.4% 4.0% 14.2% 35.6% 45.8% 81.4%
686 85.0 0.3% 2.6% 9.5% 28.4% 59.2% 87.6% 686 78.0 0.3% 5.2% 16.3% 32.7% 45.5% 78.1%
57 4.0 77.2% 8.8% 8.8% 5.3% 0.0% 5.3% 61 1.0 85.2% 11.5% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 1.6% 26 23.1%
146 12.5 59.6% 21.2% 13.7% 3.4% 2.1% 5.5% 147 11.0 67.3% 19.0% 8.2% 4.8% 0.7% 5.4% 198 33.8%
227 34.0 35.7% 23.8% 18.9% 16.3% 5.3% 21.6% 227 27.0 42.7% 22.9% 22.0% 10.1% 2.2% 12.3% 315 32.7%
432 66.0 9.7% 12.5% 22.5% 25.2% 30.1% 55.3% 430 56.0 13.5% 18.6% 23.0% 25.6% 19.3% 44.9%
119 30.0 37.0% 22.7% 20.2% 13.4% 6.7% 20.2% 118 30.0 42.4% 21.2% 16.1% 13.6% 6.8% 20.3% 163 50.9%
156 23.0 47.4% 15.4% 16.0% 14.1% 7.1% 21.2% 156 20.0 53.2% 19.9% 14.1% 10.3% 2.6% 12.8% 199 54.8%
380 12.5 64.7% 18.2% 10.3% 4.7% 2.1% 6.8% 379 5.0 78.4% 13.7% 5.5% 2.1% 0.3% 2.4%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 25
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
5 755 675 Warner ES NE Stratford 111 9.0 14.7 110 4.5 10.5
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 26
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Warner ES
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 27
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Warner ES
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 28
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Warner ES
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 29
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Warner ES
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
161 19.0 52.2% 19.9% 14.9% 12.4% 0.6% 13.0% 162 15.0 63.6% 20.4% 11.1% 4.9% 0.0% 4.9% 217 39.2%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 30
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
6 496 1 A. Z. Kelley ES SE Cane Ridge 313 34.8 38.9 313 46.0 49.4
6 110 20 Antioch HS SE Antioch 1430 14.6 19.9 1382 7.5 13.3
6 111 23 Antioch MS SE Cane Ridge 684 9.8 15.4 696 10.2 15.8 685 22.0 26.9
6 577 25 Apollo MS SE Antioch 756 17.1 22.3 736 13.3 18.7 754 42.6 46.2
6 419 7005 Cambridge ELC SE Cane Ridge
6 184 82 Cane Ridge ES SE Cane Ridge 384 21.9 26.8 392 20.7 25.7
6 182 77 Cane Ridge HS SE Cane Ridge 1227 15.2 20.5 1302 4.1 10.1
6 305 8060 Explore Community CS Stratford
6 552 318 Henry C Maxwell ES SE Cane Ridge 221 20.8 25.8 225 26.7 31.3
6 422 720 Hickory Hollow Acad SE Cane Ridge 0
6 457 8048 Intrepid Prep CS Cane Ridge 366 33.6 37.8 366 60.4 62.9 366 82.0 83.1
6 310 370 J.E. Moss ES SE Antioch 317 17.4 22.6 314 23.9 28.7
6 498 393 John F. Kennedy MS SE Antioch 735 12.8 18.3 741 10.1 15.7 740 27.2 31.8
6 506 8012 Knowledge Acad CS Cane Ridge 273 16.8 22.0 278 10.4 16.0 277 59.6 62.1
6 511 8065 Knowledge Acad CS Cane Ridge 170 22.9 27.7 143 7.7 13.5
6 512 8105 Knowledge@Crossings CS Stratford 144 14.6 19.9 141 11.3 16.8 146 54.8 57.6
6 122 430 Lakeview ES SE Antioch 232 28.0 32.5 233 25.8 30.4
6 507 8013 LEAD Prep SE CS Glencliff 487 25.1 29.8 491 26.3 30.9 491 70.1 72.0
6 576 493 Mt. View ES SE Antioch 259 21.6 26.5 262 23.7 28.5
6 618 540 Paragon Mills ES SE Glencliff 252 9.5 15.2 253 17.0 22.2
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 31
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
A. Z. Kelley ES
Antioch HS
Antioch MS
Apollo MS
Cambridge ELC
Cane Ridge ES
Cane Ridge HS
Explore Community
Henry C Maxwell ES
Hickory Hollow Acad
Intrepid Prep
J.E. Moss ES
John F. Kennedy MS
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge@Crossings
Lakeview ES
LEAD Prep SE
Mt. View ES
Paragon Mills ES
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
928 19.0 24.1 380 22.1 27.0 386 18.1 39.6 12.7 21.5 12.7 6.2 17.1 17.4 18.1 18.4 17.9
80.7%
81.6%
781 23.4 28.2 329 19.5 24.5 311 18.0 35.0 9.6 20.9 11.3 4.8 16.1 16.7 17.6 18.0 17.3
61 6.6 12.4 77 7.8 16.9 2.6 11.7 5.2 0.0 13.8 15.9 15.6 16.4 15.6 66.1%
110 42.7 46.3 0.0%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 32
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
A. Z. Kelley ES
Antioch HS
Antioch MS
Apollo MS
Cambridge ELC
Cane Ridge ES
Cane Ridge HS
Explore Community
Henry C Maxwell ES
Hickory Hollow Acad
Intrepid Prep
J.E. Moss ES
John F. Kennedy MS
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge@Crossings
Lakeview ES
LEAD Prep SE
Mt. View ES
Paragon Mills ES
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
-0.7 Level 2 -1.6 Level 1 -3.3 Level 1 -11.4 Level 1
2134 -3.6 Level 1 -0.4 Level 3 -5.6 Level 1 -4.6 -9.42
2281 0.0 Level 3 0.3 Level 3 -2.4 Level 1 2.0 4.24
1.5 Level 5 -1.3 Level 1 -3.4 Level 1 -10.9 Level 1
1078 11.2 Level 5 6.9 Level 5 12.8 Level 5 13.9 21.57 31.7 Level 5
2209 -1.8 Level 1 -0.5 Level 2 -4.1 Level 1 -1.0 -2.17
811 -1.4 Level 1 -1.5 Level 2 -7.9 Level 1 4.8 6.42 -8.7 Level 1
1.9 Level 5 1.6 Level 5 2.6 Level 4 -2.2 Level 3
429 1.8 Level 5 0.4 Level 3 -3.0 Level 1 7.7 7.20
1431 5.8 Level 5 6.3 Level 5 0.6 Level 4 10.1 18.15
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 33
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
A. Z. Kelley ES
Antioch HS
Antioch MS
Apollo MS
Cambridge ELC
Cane Ridge ES
Cane Ridge HS
Explore Community
Henry C Maxwell ES
Hickory Hollow Acad
Intrepid Prep
J.E. Moss ES
John F. Kennedy MS
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge@Crossings
Lakeview ES
LEAD Prep SE
Mt. View ES
Paragon Mills ES
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
-6.8 Level 1 -1.6 Level 2 -10.5 Level 1 -4.1 Level 1 -18.5 Level 1 -3.4 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2.5 Level 3 1 3 1 1 1
-7.7 Level 1 3 3 1 1 5
-10.8 Level 1 -14.2 Level 1 -2.1 Level 2 -10.3 Level 1 -8.2 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 5 5 5 5
-2.9 Level 3 1 2 1 1 1
1 2 1 1 5
1.4 Level 3 0.9 Level 3 6.9 Level 4 -6.6 Level 1 3 5 4 5 4 1
5 3 1 2 5
-0.3 Level 3 5 5 4 5 5
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 34
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
A. Z. Kelley ES
Antioch HS
Antioch MS
Apollo MS
Cambridge ELC
Cane Ridge ES
Cane Ridge HS
Explore Community
Henry C Maxwell ES
Hickory Hollow Acad
Intrepid Prep
J.E. Moss ES
John F. Kennedy MS
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge Acad
Knowledge@Crossings
Lakeview ES
LEAD Prep SE
Mt. View ES
Paragon Mills ES
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
440 48.0 21.4% 18.0% 24.1% 23.6% 13.0% 36.6% 453 40.0 28.5% 21.6% 20.3% 18.8% 10.8% 29.6% 610 59.8%
701 25.0 44.4% 20.7% 17.0% 12.7% 5.3% 18.0% 722 18.5 52.9% 21.5% 15.1% 7.6% 2.9% 10.5%
769 30.0 39.3% 18.9% 18.2% 16.6% 7.0% 23.7% 801 21.0 49.3% 22.1% 15.6% 9.4% 3.6% 13.0%
552 34.0 34.1% 20.7% 16.5% 16.5% 12.3% 28.8% 568 33.0 33.5% 26.2% 18.5% 14.1% 7.7% 21.8% 764 49.7%
344 30.5 39.2% 19.8% 16.9% 14.0% 10.2% 24.1% 344 32.0 36.0% 26.2% 17.2% 14.0% 6.7% 20.6% 457 53.2%
447 27.0 41.4% 21.7% 17.7% 14.8% 4.5% 19.2% 447 24.0 46.5% 21.3% 19.0% 9.2% 4.0% 13.2% 598 41.8%
645 32.0 38.0% 20.2% 18.6% 17.1% 6.2% 23.3% 702 23.0 44.4% 23.9% 16.1% 12.4% 3.1% 15.5%
329 33.0 34.7% 24.9% 14.6% 17.9% 7.9% 25.8% 330 34.5 36.4% 21.2% 19.1% 16.4% 7.0% 23.3% 451 42.1%
375 42.0 30.1% 18.4% 21.3% 18.1% 12.0% 30.1% 374 43.0 28.3% 20.3% 18.2% 21.9% 11.2% 33.2% 497 52.1%
326 29.0 38.7% 24.2% 15.6% 14.7% 6.7% 21.5% 327 25.0 45.0% 22.9% 19.3% 9.8% 3.1% 12.8% 414 31.2%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 35
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
7 186 7020 Casa Asafran ELC SE Glencliff
7 238 148 Croft MS SW Overton 615 23.4 28.2 616 18.7 23.8 617 51.7 54.7
7 320 240 Glencliff ES SE Glencliff 203 17.7 22.8 203 26.6 31.2
7 325 245 Glencliff HS SE Glencliff 826 12.1 17.6 826 2.9 9.0
7 335 255 Glengarry ES SE Glencliff 162 12.3 17.8 163 21.5 26.4
7 345 265 Glenview ES SE Glencliff 233 12.0 17.5 234 23.9 28.7
7 790 390 John B. Whitsitt ES SW Glencliff 169 11.8 17.3 170 25.9 30.5
7 605 8004 New Vision Acad CS Glancliff 198 25.3 30.0 199 19.6 24.6 199 60.8 63.3
7 145 525 Norman Binkley ES SW Overton 148 37.2 41.1 148 32.4 36.6
7 668 8070 Rocketship United CS Glencliff 174 13.2 18.6 173 35.8 39.8
7 686 750 Smith Springs ES SE Antioch 201 19.4 24.4 201 31.3 35.6
7 575 208 Thomas A Edison ES SE Antioch 273 20.5 25.5 276 26.4 31.0
7 551 633 Thurgood Marshall MS SE Cane Ridge 818 15.6 20.9 830 13.5 18.9 819 26.6 31.2
7 735 655 Una ES SE Antioch 315 18.1 23.2 314 34.1 38.2
7 805 715 Wright MS SE Glencliff 647 7.6 13.4 650 4.9 10.8 647 17.5 22.7
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 36
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Casa Asafran ELC
Croft MS
Glencliff ES
Glencliff HS
Glengarry ES
Glenview ES
John B. Whitsitt ES
New Vision Acad
Norman Binkley ES
Rocketship United
Smith Springs ES
Thomas A Edison ES
Thurgood Marshall MS
Una ES
Wright MS
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
593 20.9 25.8 255 15.7 21.0 239 15.1 27.6 9.6 18.4 12.6 3.8 15.5 16.9 16.9 18.0 17.0 70.0%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 37
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Casa Asafran ELC
Croft MS
Glencliff ES
Glencliff HS
Glengarry ES
Glenview ES
John B. Whitsitt ES
New Vision Acad
Norman Binkley ES
Rocketship United
Smith Springs ES
Thomas A Edison ES
Thurgood Marshall MS
Una ES
Wright MS
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
1832 -1.2 Level 1 -1.3 Level 1 -3.9 Level 1 1.3 2.53
-0.6 Level 2 -0.9 Level 2 -0.4 Level 3 -9.3 Level 1
597 2.8 Level 5 5.4 Level 5 -1.7 Level 2 4.7 5.35
2607 -2.5 Level 1 -1.0 Level 1 -3.2 Level 1 -3.4 -7.61
2020 -1.9 Level 1 -1.1 Level 1 -1.4 Level 1 -3.0 -6.23
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 38
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Casa Asafran ELC
Croft MS
Glencliff ES
Glencliff HS
Glengarry ES
Glenview ES
John B. Whitsitt ES
New Vision Acad
Norman Binkley ES
Rocketship United
Smith Springs ES
Thomas A Edison ES
Thurgood Marshall MS
Una ES
Wright MS
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
-4.7 Level 2 1 1 1 1 5
0.1 Level 3 -1.8 Level 2 -12.0 Level 1 0.9 Level 3 -9.7 Level 1 -4.0 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 5 2 5 5
-2.1 Level 3 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 39
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Casa Asafran ELC
Croft MS
Glencliff ES
Glencliff HS
Glengarry ES
Glenview ES
John B. Whitsitt ES
New Vision Acad
Norman Binkley ES
Rocketship United
Smith Springs ES
Thomas A Edison ES
Thurgood Marshall MS
Una ES
Wright MS
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
597 49.0 23.3% 20.3% 18.6% 24.6% 13.2% 37.9% 573 34.0 33.0% 22.9% 19.7% 16.2% 8.2% 24.4%
267 29.0 41.2% 21.3% 16.5% 14.6% 6.4% 21.0% 261 27.0 44.1% 21.8% 19.5% 9.6% 5.0% 14.6% 367 45.2%
216 28.5 41.7% 23.1% 16.7% 15.3% 3.2% 18.5% 223 27.0 45.3% 21.1% 20.6% 11.2% 1.8% 13.0% 307 44.0%
352 21.0 48.9% 22.2% 18.8% 7.7% 2.6% 10.2% 353 20.0 52.7% 19.8% 14.2% 9.6% 3.7% 13.3% 450 46.0%
240 28.5 37.1% 27.9% 12.1% 15.4% 7.5% 22.9% 239 29.0 42.7% 23.4% 16.7% 13.4% 3.8% 17.2% 327 47.4%
309 33.0 35.9% 23.6% 14.6% 17.2% 8.7% 25.9% 308 29.5 40.6% 21.8% 17.9% 14.0% 5.8% 19.8% 429 42.0%
312 46.0 26.6% 17.9% 24.7% 15.7% 15.1% 30.8% 310 43.0 26.1% 21.0% 22.3% 16.8% 13.9% 30.6% 433 60.0%
377 40.0 30.0% 21.5% 19.1% 19.4% 10.1% 29.4% 377 35.0 35.5% 19.9% 22.8% 14.1% 7.7% 21.8% 540 56.5%
749 39.0 32.8% 19.9% 22.0% 17.2% 8.0% 25.2% 802 29.0 40.3% 22.7% 18.7% 13.7% 4.6% 18.3%
386 43.0 28.2% 18.4% 22.0% 19.9% 11.4% 31.3% 392 40.0 30.1% 22.2% 20.9% 19.9% 6.9% 26.8% 274 49.3%
679 28.0 40.8% 23.3% 19.1% 12.4% 4.4% 16.8% 685 19.0 52.4% 22.2% 14.5% 9.2% 1.8% 10.9%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 40
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
8 280 195 Eakin ES SW Hillsboro 225 52.9 55.8 228 56.6 59.3
8 330 250 Glendale ES SW Hillsboro 145 73.8 75.4 146 82.2 83.3
8 397 302 Harris-Hillman SW Hillsboro 0 0 0 0 0
8 435 335 Hillsboro HS SW Hillsboro 0 778 33.4 37.6 866 18.7 23.8
8 563 490 J.T. Moore MS SW Hillsboro 653 44.6 48.1 653 50.1 53.2 651 74.2 75.8
8 380 415 Julia Green ES SW Hillsboro 181 79.0 80.3 181 82.3 83.4
8 650 570 Percy Priest ES SW Hillsboro 210 75.2 76.8 211 84.4 85.4
8 765 755 Waverly-Belmont ES SW Hillsboro 129 41.9 45.5 130 33.8 37.9
8 770 690 West End MS SW Hillsboro 450 38.2 42.1 449 33.9 38.0 450 59.3 61.8
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 41
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Eakin ES
Glendale ES
Harris-Hillman
Hillsboro HS
J.T. Moore MS
Julia Green ES
Percy Priest ES
Waverly-Belmont ES
West End MS
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
0.0%
524 41.8 45.4 221 39.4 43.2 270 41.5 64.1 28.9 42.6 31.1 19.3 20.0 19.2 21.0 20.6 20.4 84.9%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 42
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Eakin ES
Glendale ES
Harris-Hillman
Hillsboro HS
J.T. Moore MS
Julia Green ES
Percy Priest ES
Waverly-Belmont ES
West End MS
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
-0.5 Level 3 -3.5 Level 1 -0.9 Level 2 -4.9 Level 1
1841 -0.6 Level 2 -4.5 Level 1 1.1 Level 5 1.7 3.51
1324 -0.3 Level 3 -1.8 Level 1 -0.5 Level 3 1.4 2.33
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 43
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Eakin ES
Glendale ES
Harris-Hillman
Hillsboro HS
J.T. Moore MS
Julia Green ES
Percy Priest ES
Waverly-Belmont ES
West End MS
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
1.0 Level 3 -6.5 Level 1 -4.1 Level 1 1.7 Level 3 -2.3 Level 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
10.0 Level 5 9.4 Level 5 2 1 5 1 5
6.9 Level 4 3 1 3 1 5
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 44
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Eakin ES
Glendale ES
Harris-Hillman
Hillsboro HS
J.T. Moore MS
Julia Green ES
Percy Priest ES
Waverly-Belmont ES
West End MS
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
333 66.0 19.5% 10.5% 14.7% 21.9% 33.3% 55.3% 334 58.0 22.5% 11.4% 18.6% 20.4% 27.2% 47.6% 448 72.1%
232 85.0 1.3% 5.6% 11.2% 23.3% 58.6% 81.9% 237 78.0 3.4% 6.8% 16.9% 29.5% 43.5% 73.0% 322 91.9%
655 71.0 16.6% 10.7% 13.6% 25.2% 33.9% 59.1% 654 63.0 18.5% 11.9% 16.2% 25.2% 28.1% 53.4%
252 87.5 2.8% 4.0% 9.9% 20.6% 62.7% 83.3% 251 82.0 4.0% 5.2% 11.2% 25.5% 54.2% 79.7% 341 82.7%
321 84.0 1.9% 5.6% 8.7% 26.2% 57.6% 83.8% 322 82.0 1.9% 4.7% 14.0% 27.3% 52.2% 79.5% 422 85.3%
252 58.0 22.2% 11.9% 18.3% 23.4% 24.2% 47.6% 256 49.0 26.6% 16.0% 20.3% 16.8% 20.3% 37.1% 367 74.4%
455 56.0 23.5% 13.0% 16.5% 20.9% 26.2% 47.0% 426 41.0 31.2% 18.3% 16.0% 19.0% 15.5% 34.5%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 45
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
MNPS
Schl #
TN
Schl # School
2017 TNReady ELA
Quad-
rant Cluster
#
Tested
Dist-
rict
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
2017 TNReady Math 2017 TNReady Science 2017 TNReady HS ELA 2017 TNReady HS Math
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
9 130 40 Bellevue MS SW Hillwood 638 28.5 33.0 640 31.3 35.6 639 58.2 60.8
9 142 53 Big Picture HS SW Hillwood 106 32.1 36.3 66 6.1 12.0
9 205 110 Charlotte Park ES SW Hillwood 176 13.6 19.0 177 16.9 22.1
9 718 745 Cohn Learning SE Hillwood 0 0
9 360 280 Gower ES SW Hillwood 259 29.7 34.1 260 36.5 40.5
9 434 295 H.G. Hill MS School SW Hillwood 600 24.2 28.9 603 24.0 28.8 602 48.8 52.0
9 395 300 Harpeth Valley ES SW Hillwood 315 54.3 57.2 314 48.7 51.9
9 440 340 Hillwood HS SW Hillwood 785 24.5 29.2 822 11.2 16.8
9 562 437 Middle College HS SE Hillwood 0 0
9 715 630 Sylvan Park ES SW Hillsboro 189 53.4 56.3 189 48.1 51.3
9 748 3 Virtual School SE Hillsboro 0 0 0 0 0
9 775 695 Westmeade ES SW Hillwood 174 33.3 37.5 175 34.9 39.0
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 46
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Bellevue MS
Big Picture HS
Charlotte Park ES
Cohn Learning
Gower ES
H.G. Hill MS School
Harpeth Valley ES
Hillwood HS
Middle College HS
Sylvan Park ES
Virtual School
Westmeade ES
Engl Math Read Scie All 4 Engl Math Read Scie Comp
2017 TNReady HS Science 2017 ACT
Met College Readiness Benchmarks
#
Tested
% 21 or
Above
2016 ACT Composite
% 21 or
Above
2018
AMO
Average Score
#
Tested
% On
Track/
Master
2018
AMO
#
Tested
HS Grad
Rate
70 22.9 27.7 36 19.4 24.4 32 28.1 43.8 15.6 18.8 15.6 9.4 18.0 17.7 18.6 18.6 18.4 100.0%
0 0.0%
468 41.7 45.3 222 32.4 36.6 187 32.6 48.1 20.3 32.6 26.2 12.3 18.1 18.3 19.1 19.6 18.9 80.8%
0 46 43.5 47.0 45 66.7 91.1 35.6 64.4 40.0 22.2 22.5 20.6 23.5 22.2 22.3 92.2%
0 0 11 72.7 90.9 45.5 63.6 54.5 45.5 24.5 20.5 26.6 24.4 24.1 64.3%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 47
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Bellevue MS
Big Picture HS
Charlotte Park ES
Cohn Learning
Gower ES
H.G. Hill MS School
Harpeth Valley ES
Hillwood HS
Middle College HS
Sylvan Park ES
Virtual School
Westmeade ES
# Stu
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
NCE
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores
Composite ELA Math Science English I English II English III Algebra I Algebra II
1841 -0.8 Level 2 -2.1 Level 1 1.0 Level 4 -0.9 -1.90
1.7 Level 4 0.0 Level 3 0.4 Level 3 0.6 Level 3
-4.6 Level 1 -4.3 Level 1 -3.0 Level 1
1831 -0.4 Level 2 0.3 Level 3 0.0 Level 3 -1.5 -2.89
-0.2 Level 3 0.0 Level 3 -1.1 Level 2 -1.1 Level 3
-0.2 Level 3 1.3 Level 4 3.5 Level 4
20 -6.2 Level 2 -0.8 Level 3 -10.6 -2.30 -0.5 Level 3 -1.0 Level 3 -0.2 Level 3
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 48
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Bellevue MS
Big Picture HS
Charlotte Park ES
Cohn Learning
Gower ES
H.G. Hill MS School
Harpeth Valley ES
Hillwood HS
Middle College HS
Sylvan Park ES
Virtual School
Westmeade ES
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
SS
Growth Level
2017 TVAAS Growth Scores (continued)
Overall
Comp-
osite Literacy
Social
Studies
2017 TVAAS School-wide Composites
Integr Math II Integr Math III Biology Chemistry U.S. HistoryIntegr Math I
Numer-
acy
Literacy
& Numer Science
Geometry
-5.1 Level 2 1 1 4 2 2
-12.3 Level 1 -16.4 Level 1 -6.4 Level 2 -12.4 Level 1 0.8 Level 3 1 3 1 1 1 3
-3.8 Level 3 -6.4 Level 1 -12.8 Level 1 -5.4 Level 3 -9.4 Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5.7 Level 4 2 3 3 3 1
-3.8 Level 1 -5.8 Level 1 -11.9 Level 1 -5.7 Level 1 12.0 Level 5 -0.9 Level 2 1 2 1 1 4 2
-1.8 Level 3 22.9 Level 5 1.8 Level 4 5 3 3 3 5 4
-0.5 Level 3 2 3 3 3 1 3
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 49
MNPS School Level Accountability/Assessment Data (November 2017)
School
Bellevue MS
Big Picture HS
Charlotte Park ES
Cohn Learning
Gower ES
H.G. Hill MS School
Harpeth Valley ES
Hillwood HS
Middle College HS
Sylvan Park ES
Virtual School
Westmeade ES
# Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5 # Tested Med NP % Q1 % Q2 % Q3 % Q4 % Q5
% Q4-
Q5
Fall 2017-18 TLA
# Tested
% At/Above
Benchmrk
Fall 2017-2018 MAP
Reading Math
585 52.0 23.8% 15.7% 18.8% 21.4% 20.3% 41.7% 594 41.0 28.3% 21.2% 20.4% 18.5% 11.6% 30.1%
230 24.0 46.5% 24.3% 16.1% 9.1% 3.9% 13.0% 229 18.0 53.7% 17.9% 15.3% 11.4% 1.7% 13.1% 315 42.5%
385 53.0 18.7% 20.3% 17.1% 22.6% 21.3% 43.9% 381 49.0 24.9% 16.5% 21.0% 18.1% 19.4% 37.5% 498 65.1%
620 45.0 26.1% 19.2% 20.2% 21.1% 13.4% 34.5% 639 35.0 34.6% 21.4% 19.9% 17.1% 7.0% 24.1%
426 70.0 12.0% 12.7% 13.6% 24.9% 36.9% 61.7% 428 60.0 14.7% 14.0% 21.7% 23.4% 26.2% 49.5% 586 77.8%
253 70.0 17.4% 8.7% 15.0% 24.1% 34.8% 58.9% 250 60.0 19.2% 10.4% 21.6% 21.6% 27.2% 48.8% 342 72.5%
238 55.0 19.7% 16.0% 19.3% 28.6% 16.4% 45.0% 240 46.0 27.5% 15.0% 20.8% 25.0% 11.7% 36.7% 328 62.2%
Note: There is a 1-year lag in state accountability reporting for ACT and graduation rate. Some schools are missing TNReady results due to insufficient student counts for state to generate Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). 50