+ All Categories

Agenda

Date post: 26-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: lucine
View: 29 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Agenda. Student Learning Growth Teacher VAM School Growth PYG Area Scorecards. PYG, and other Performance Indicators. Florida Department of Education’s “Value-Added Model (VAM)”. Marc Baron, Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard, Director, Research, Evaluation, and Assessment. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
73
DRE Agenda Student Learning Growth Teacher VAM School Growth PYG Area Scorecards. PYG, and other Performance Indicators
Transcript
Page 1: Agenda

DRE

Agenda

• Student Learning Growth– Teacher VAM– School Growth

• PYG• Area Scorecards. PYG, and other

Performance Indicators

Page 2: Agenda

DRE

Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s “Value-Added Model (VAM)” “Value-Added Model (VAM)”

Marc Baron, Chief, Performance Accountability

Mark Howard, Director, Research, Evaluation, and Assessment

Page 3: Agenda

DRE

FLDOE Value-Added ModelEstablished by Student Success Act (SB 736)

• Evaluation Criteria for All Instructional Personnel and School Administrators– Professional Practice– Student Learning Growth

• FCAT Classroom Teachers: 40%-50%• Non FCAT Classroom Teachers: 30%-40%• Non Classroom Teachers: 20%-30%• Principals: 50%

• JTEC & Principal Evaluation Committee

Page 4: Agenda

SDPBC Must Classify Instructional Personnel and School Administrators

into these Four Categories

–Highly Effective–Effective–Needs Improvement–Unsatisfactory

Page 5: Agenda

DRE

VAM & Student Learning Growth

• Contribution to a change in a student’s achievement

• Calculated from a measure of student learning growth

Page 6: Agenda

DRE

The difference between Current test score and Predicted test score

What is the Predicted Student Score?

What is the Student Learning Growth Score?

Page 7: Agenda

DRE

It is score you would predict a student to achieve based on the student’s performance on prior tests

and other information available on the student

What is the Predicted Student Score?

Page 8: Agenda

DRE

FLDOE Value-Added Model Variables determining student learning growth

• Two or more years of prior achievement scores • Gifted status • Student Attendance (Days)• Mobility (number of transitions) • Difference from modal age in grade (indicator of retention) • Class size • The number of subject-relevant courses in which

the student is enrolled• Homogeneity of entering test scores in the class

Page 9: Agenda

DRE

FLDOE Value-Added Model Variables determining student learning growth

• Students with Disabilities (SWD) status – Language impaired– Hearing impaired– Visually impaired– Emotional/behavioral– Specific learning disability– Dual sensory impaired– Autism spectrum disorder– Traumatic brain injury– Other health impaired– Intellectual disability

• English Language Learner (ELL) status – LY

Page 10: Agenda

DRE

FLDOE Value-Added Model Variables not determining student learning growth

• Gender

• Race

• Ethnicity

• Socioeconomic status

Page 11: Agenda

DRE

FLDOE Value-Added Model

Variables determining student learning growth

TERMSDistrict Data Base of All Student Records

Page 12: Agenda

DRE

What is the Predicted Student Score?

PRIOR TEST

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

Page 13: Agenda

DRE

What is the Predicted Student Score?

PRIOR TEST

900

800

700

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 14: Agenda

DRE

What is the Predicted Student Score?

PRIOR TEST

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

(FY10 FCAT)

W(F

Y11

FC

AT

)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 15: Agenda

DRE

What is the Predicted Student Score?

PRIOR TEST

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

PREDICTED SCORE600

Answer:Average of

current scores of similar students

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 16: Agenda

DRE

Student Learning Growth is the Amount Above or Below Predicted Score

PRIOR TEST

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

PREDICTED SCORE600

Above Predicted Score

Below Predicted Score

ACTUAL SCORE

ACTUAL SCORE

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 17: Agenda

PRIOR TEST PRIOR TEST 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100…

Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL

What is the Predicted Student Score? Based on Prior Achievement

40050

600

800

70

90Each prior year test score has a

Predicted current year test score.

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 18: Agenda

FLDOE Value-Added Model Variables determining student learning growth

• Two or more years of prior achievement scores

• Attendance • Mobility (number of transitions) • Difference from modal age in

grade (indicator of retention) • Class size • The number of subject-relevant

courses in which the student is enrolled

• Homogeneity of entering test scores in the class

• LY

• Gifted status • Language impaired• Hearing impaired• Visually impaired• Emotional/behavioral• Specific learning disability• Dual sensory impaired• Autism spectrum disorder• Traumatic brain injury• Other health impaired• Intellectual disability

Page 19: Agenda

Reading Grade 7Indicators Ranked By Statistical Significance

Indicator T-StatisticAchievement: Prior Year 75.667Achievement: Two Prior Years 38.167Enrolled in 2 or more courses 18.354Difference from Modal Age 15.977Attendance 13.571Number of students in Class 1 8.439Homogeneity of Class 2 Prior Year Test Scores 7.182Language Impaired 5.362Specific Learning Disability 5.013Homogeneity of Class 1 Prior Year Test Scores 4.750ELL Indicator 4.673Homogeneity of Class 3 Prior Year Test Scores 3.188Number of students in Class 5 2.385Enrolled in 2 or more class periods 2.289Mobility: Number of School Transfers 2.271Intellectual Disability 2.141

Page 20: Agenda

Illustrative Growth Points All other variables being equal

Variables Growth Points*Typical 100ELL 100 moreLow Attendance 100 points less

*adapted from AIR materials presented at August 2, 2011,meetingThese are illustrative values, not actual values

Page 21: Agenda

PRIOR TEST PRIOR TEST 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100…

Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL

What is the Predicted Student Score?

40050

600

800

70

90

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 22: Agenda

PRIOR TEST PRIOR TEST

Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL

What is the Predicted Student Score?

400500

600

800

700

900

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 23: Agenda

PRIOR TEST PRIOR TEST

Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement& Low Attendance

What is the Predicted Student Score?

400

300

600

800

500

700

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 24: Agenda

How to calculate the student learning growth score?

PRIOR TEST DRE

The diagonal line is the predicted growth

observed among similar students.

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 25: Agenda

How to calculate the student learning growth score?

PRIOR TEST

Student PY CY Pred Growth

A 200 300 400 -100

B 30 55 45 10

C 40 40 50 -10

D 50 70 60 10

DRE(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 26: Agenda

How to calculate the student learning growth score?

PRIOR TEST

Student PY CY Pred Growth

A 200 300 400 -100

B

C 40 40 50 -10

D 50 70 60 10

DRE(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

300 550 450 100

W

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 27: Agenda

How to calculate the student learning growth score?

PRIOR TEST

Student PY CY Pred Growth

A 200 300 400 -100

B 300 550 450 100

C 400 400 500 -100

D 50 70 60 10

DRE(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

? ? ? ?

Y

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 28: Agenda

How to calculate the student learning growth score?

PRIOR TEST

Student PY CY Pred Growth

A 20 30 40 -10

B 30 55 45 10

C 400 400 500 -100

D 500 700 600 100

DRE(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 29: Agenda

DRE

How do you calculate the teacher growth score?

1. Identify the students assigned to the teacher

2. Determine the learning growth of each of the assigned students

3. Calculate the average learning growth of the students

TERMS

Page 30: Agenda

PRIOR TEST DRE

Student PY CY Pred Growth

A 200 300 400 -100

B 300 550 450 100

C 400 400 500 -100

D 500 700 600 100

Average 0

Typical

Teacher Growth Score

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 31: Agenda

Teacher Growth Score

PRIOR TEST

Above

DRE

Student PY CY Pred Growth

E 200 300 400 - 100

F 300 550 400 100

G 400 750 500 250

H 500 700 600 100

Average 80.75

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 32: Agenda

PRIOR TEST DRE

Student PY CY Pred Growth

I 200 300 400 -100

J 300 250 450 - 200

K 400 400 500 -100

L 500 700 600 100

Average - 70.5

Below

Teacher Growth Score

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 33: Agenda

DRE

Teacher Growth

Teacher Growth

School Growth

Avg Growth = (A+B+C+D)/4

Page 34: Agenda

DRE

Teacher Effect

Teacher Effect

School Growth

Page 35: Agenda

Calculating Teacher Value-Added ScorePart 1

=

DRE

School GrowthScore

Teacher GrowthScore

-( )Teacher Effect

Page 36: Agenda

DRE

How do you calculate the school learning growth score?

1. Identify the students assigned to the school

2. Determine the learning growth of each of the assigned students

3. Calculate the average learning growth of the students

Page 37: Agenda

School Growth Score

PRIOR TEST DRE

Stdt PY CY Pred Growth

A 200 300 400 -100

B 300 550 450 100

C 400 400 500 -100

D 500 700 600 100

E 200 300 400 - 100

F 300 550 450 100

G 400 750 500 250

H 500 700 600 100

I 200 300 400 -100

J 300 250 450 - 200

K 400 400 500 -100

L 500 700 600 100

Avg 4.1

(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

Page 38: Agenda

Calculating Teacher Value-Added ScorePart 1: AKA Teacher Effect

Typical Above BelowTeacher Growth Score 0 80.75 -70.5

School Growth Score 4.1 4.1 4.1

Teacher Effect (Tchgrowth score – Schgrowth score) -4.1 76.65 -74.6

DRE

Tcheffect = (Tchgrowth score – Schgrowth score )

Page 39: Agenda

What is a Teacher Value-Added Score?

and

How is it calculated?

DRE

Page 40: Agenda

FLDOE Teacher Value-Added Score Conceptual

.5 + ( XSchool GrowthScore

)=

DRE

School GrowthScore

Teacher GrowthScore

-( )Teacher Effect

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth score – Schgrowth score ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth score)

Page 41: Agenda

Teacher Value-Added Score

Typical Above BelowTeacher Growth Score 0 80.75 -70.5

School Growth Score 4.1 4.1 4.1

Teacher Effect Tchgrowth score – Schgrowth score -4.1 76.65 -74.6.5 x Schgrowth score 2.05 2.05 2.05Tchvas -2.05 78.7 -72.55

DRE

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth score – Schgrowth score ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth score)

Page 42: Agenda

State Average Student Learning Growth

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

VAS = 15

VAS = 20

VAS = 25

Teacher Growth = 20

The greater a teacher’s growth score is from the

state’s average and the school’s growth score, the higher a

teacher’s VAS

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth - Schgrowth ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth)

Page 43: Agenda

DRE

State Average Student Learning Growth

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

VAS = 0

VAS = -20

VAS = 20

School Growth = 0

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth - Schgrowth ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth)

At a school with a growth score of 0, the teacher’s VAS

equals the teacher’s growth

Page 44: Agenda

DRE

State Average Student Learning Growth

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

VAS = 15

School Growth = 10

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth - Schgrowth ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth)

VAS = 5

VAS = 0

VAS = -10

VAS = -5

At a high VAS school, a

teacher’s growth must exceed half

the school’s growth to have a

positive VAS

What is the significance of the green

line?

Page 45: Agenda

DRE

State Average Student Learning Growth

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

VAS = -15

School Growth = -10

Tchvas = (Tchgrowth - Schgrowth ) + ( .5 x Schgrowth)

VAS = -5

VAS =0

VAS = 10

VAS = 5

At a low VAS school, a teacher’s growth

must exceed half the school’s growth to

have a positive VAS

Page 46: Agenda

DRE

A Real Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

Page 47: Agenda

DRE

Teacher VAM

Page 48: Agenda

DRE

SDPBC Teacher VAM (Grade 5 Subject: Reading)

Mean = 3.3N = 561Class >= 10

Page 49: Agenda

DRE

State Teacher VAM (Grade 5 Subject: Reading)

Mean = 0.1N = 12182

Page 50: Agenda

Teacher VAM Distribution for Reading

Page 51: Agenda

DRE

School Growth

Page 52: Agenda

DRE

SDPBC School GrowthGrade 5 Subject: Reading

Mean = 4.0N = 120

Page 53: Agenda

DRE

State School GrowthGrade 5 Subject: Reading

Mean = 0.02N = 2082

Page 54: Agenda

School ComponentDistribution for Reading

Page 55: Agenda

DRE

How precise are VAM measures?

Page 56: Agenda

DRE

Standard Error of Teacher VAMs

• The standard error gives the uncertainty (error band) surrounding a teacher’s VAM score

• It can be used to prevent categorizing teachers when that categorization would be uncertain

Page 57: Agenda

DRE

Standard Error of Teacher VAMs

Teacher Score

Plusone SE

Minus one SE

Page 58: Agenda

DRE

Using SE to Categorize Teachers

Teacher 2

Teacher 1

Teacher 3

Teacher 4

State Average Score

Page 59: Agenda

DRE

Teacher VAMs Similar to StateVAM # of

StdtsSig from

State

StateMean

No sig higher &No sig diff

No sig higher &No sig diff

No sig higher &No sig diff

Page 60: Agenda

DRE

Some teacher VAMs Higher than StateVAM # of

StdtsSig from

StateStateMean

1 sig higher &No sig diff

2 sig higher &No sig diff

4 sig higher &sig differences

Page 61: Agenda

DRE

Some teacher VAMs Lower than StateVAM # of

StdtsSig from

StateStateMean

1 sig lower No sig diff

2 sig lower &sig differences

3 sig lower &No sig diff

Page 62: Agenda

DRE

Some Teacher VAMs Lower/Higher than State

VAM # of Stdts

Sig from State

StateMean

1 sig higher2 sig lower &sig differences

1 sig higher 1 sig lower &sig differences

Page 63: Agenda

DRE

Summary: VAM and School Learning Growth

• State Mandated• Student Learning Growth

– Difference between current score and predicted score– Based on prior achievement and selected student

characteristics

• Teacher VAM includes both teacher effect and school learning growth

• School component is school learning growth• Consider standard error when using Teacher

VAM and school learning growth

Page 64: Agenda

SDPBC Must Classify Instructional Personnel/School Administrators

into these Four Categories

–Highly Effective–Effective–Needs Improvement–Unsatisfactory

Page 65: Agenda

DRE

Proportion of a Year’s Growth& School Growth Score

Page 66: Agenda

PRIOR TEST DRE(FY10 FCAT)

(FY

11 F

CA

T)

…100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000…

FY10 FY11 FY11FCAT FCAT -FY10

LESS

MORE

One Year’s Worth of Growth

Std PY CY CY-PY

Year's Worth

of Growth

PYG

A 200 300 100 150 0.67E 200 300 100 150 0.67I 200 300 100 150 0.67B 300 550 250 125 2.00F 300 550 250 125 2.00J 300 250 -50 125 -0.40C 400 400 0 100 0.00G 400 750 350 100 3.50K 400 400 0 100 0.00D 500 700 200 80 2.50H 500 700 200 80 2.50L 500 700 200 80 2.50Avg 1.38

PYG

150125 100

80

Page 67: Agenda

DRE

A Real Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

Page 68: Agenda

SDPBCMean

Page 69: Agenda
Page 70: Agenda

1110090807

Page 71: Agenda
Page 72: Agenda

DRE

Area Scorecard and PYG

To review area and school scorecards, go to the EDW.

Page 73: Agenda

DRE

Summary: PYG and Scorecard

• PYG–Difference between current score

and predicted score–Highly correlated with school

learning growth–Use PYG reports and scorecard to

see how you would have done?


Recommended