SUBJECTDIRECTOMEETINGDATE:DIVISION 1. PU1.1 To
2. RE2.1 Tha 3. KE 3.1 The A C
exp 3.2 Co
As pronee ApGeserPlaiss
CoGeto b
T:ORATE: G:
N/WARDS AFF
URPOSE consider the dra
ECOMMENDATIat Cabinet adop
EY ISSUES:
e Role of a CusCustomer Chartepect. It also outli
ontext - Systempart of the Cou
ocess was instieds/concerns we
pplicants/Agenteneral commentsrvice delivery; acanning Committeues with Commi
ommunity and Teneral commentsbe kept informed
DEVReg
Cab 4th D
FECTED: ALL
aft Development
IONS pts the draft Cust
stomer Charter er explains whaines how custom
s Thinking Revncil’s authority-wigated in early ere identified an
ts/Developers: s: Most concernccess to web-baee: Noted Comittee Members.
Town Councils/s: Most concernd; required good
VELOPMENT Ceneration & C
binet December 201L
t Control Custom
tomer Charter, s
at Development mers can help th
view wide aim to unde
2011 to examnd grouped into t
ed about access
ased informationmmittee Membe
/Neighbours: ed about an ope
d web-based info
1
CONTROL CUCulture
3
mer Charter.
subject to approp
Control does, oe service meet t
erstand what cumine and re-detwo distinct sect
s to pre-applicat; keeping planni
er’s reluctance t
en and transpareormation; require
1
STOMER CHA
priate comment.
ur commitment the standards.
stomers want, asign how teamors which are de
tion advice; timeing conditions too accept officer
ent process; wised an effective e
ARTER
.
to achieve spec
a System Thinkinms respond to etailed as follow
eframes (speed o a minimum. r recommendati
shed to be listenenforcement ser
cified standards
ng Review of MCcustomer need
ws:
and honesty); c
ions; requested
ned to; required rvice.
Agenda Ite
and what custo
CC’s planning ads. Customers
consistency of a
opportunities to
access to advic
em 4(vii)
omers can
application and their
dvice and
o discuss
ce; wished
2
Planning Committee: requested adequate time to speak at committee meetings; requested Committee Members take part fully in the debate. Following an analysis of the needs and concerns as detailed above, a re-design of the planning application process has been instigated and the following principles have been adopted in line with MCC’s statutory obligations:
o Early and direct (face to face) contact with the applicant on site is providing positive feedback and saves time for the applicant; o Nurturing better relationships with other services namely Building Control and Countryside is improving the exchange of
information and improving the quality and speed of response; o Resolving errors in the application and agreeing early amendments is resulting in a quicker turnaround of applications and
reduced costs associated with re-consultation; o Delivering neighbour’s letters by hand has led to better assessments as it aids officers explanations and therefore reduces
objections; o The appointment of individual Case Officers is improving their understanding of the application which is expediting processes; o Involving applicants in the process is leading to earlier resolutions.
The planning determination process has been improved by ensuring the Committee process is more transparent and democratic by introducing public speaking for third parties, such as objectors and supporters of proposals. The Council’s determination under officer delegated powers has also been changed to enable minor applications generating minor objections to be considered in a more responsive manner. This new approach involves the Delegation Panel (made up of three Members and a senior officer) meeting in public, viewing the site of the proposal and meeting objectors and the applicant before a decision on whether the application can be delegated to officers is made. Prior to this, this decision was made in the office without the involvement of the public.
More recently, the Development Control Team has undertaken an 18 month strategic revisit of the on-going ST review. This has identified more areas that need attention to improve the service for MCC’s customers namely the pre-application advice process, the quality and legibility of web-based information and the need for a Customer Charter.
3.3 The Customer Charter CMC2 have been appointed to produce the Customer Charter on behalf of Development Control. In developing the draft Charter the need to capture the views of MCC residents/customers were recognised and a series of research activities were undertaken namely: A web based consultation in the form of a ‘Pop Up’ when customers accessed ‘Planning’ web pages; Direct questionnaires sent to agents and applicants and random sampling questionnaires distributed to the public via One Stop
Shops, Libraries, TIC’s, etc.; Presentations to the Economy Development Select Committee on the 2nd October 2013 and to the Planning Committee on the 5th
November 2013 Email survey to Town and Community Councils and Council Members The analysis of the data has led to the development of the draft Customer Charter which focuses on an overall need to improve dialogue between Officers and service users. The Charter contains specific references to the other major focus for improvement will be the presentation of information on the website which is in progress. The draft Customer Charter is attached in Appendix One for consideration.
3
4. REASONS The Charter would explain in simple language i) what functions the Development Control perform, ii) set out the Section’s commitment to
achieve specified standards and iii) explain what customers can expect, and iv) outline how customers can help the service meet the standards. This will help us achieve a good customer service and should help improve performance.
5. RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS None. The standards set out in the Charter are already in place. 6. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS The Equality Impact Assessment and Sustainability checklist is appended. All impacts have been assessed as positive/ neutral. The
revised method of working enables officers to interact more directly with customers and to be more accessible and responsive. This would help meet the needs of all customers including those with particular access difficulties..
7. CONSULTEES See par. 3.3 above. Strategic Leadership Team Cabinet Members Head of Legal Services Head of Finance 8. BACKGROUND PAPERS None.
9. AUTHORS: Philip Thomas, Development Control Manager, MCC David Jones, Head of Public Health and Culture, MCC 10. CONTACT DETAILS: Tel: 01633 644809 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 01633 644101 E-mail: [email protected]
Untitled-1 1 11/20/2013 2:17:15 PM
Untitled-1 2 11/20/2013 2:17:16 PM
Appendix A The “Equality Challenge” (Screening document) Name of the Officer completing “the Equality challenge”
Philip Thomas
Please give a brief description of the aims proposed policy or service reconfiguration
Development Control Customer Charter to improve and publicise our service and the standards our customers can expect.
Name of the Division or service area
Development Control
Date “Challenge” form completed
18th November 2013
0Protected characteristic affected
Negative impact
Please give details
Neutral impact
Please give details
Positive Impact
Please give details
Age None None Officers will meet applicants/ neighbours on site/ at their home to discuss planning issues
Disability None None See above
Marriage + Civil Partnership None None See above
Pregnancy and maternity None None See above
Race None None See above
Religion or Belief None None See above
Sex (was Gender) None None See above
Sexual Orientation None None See above
Transgender None None See above
Welsh Language None None We have the ability to converse in Welsh if required as one of our officers is bilingual.
What are the potential negative Impacts.
Ideas as to how we can look to MITIGATE the negative impacts (include any reasonable adjustments or engagement with affected
parties).
None
The next steps If you have assessed the proposal/s as having a positive impact please give full details below:
If you have assessed the proposal/s as having a Negative Impact could you please provide us with details of what you propose to do to mitigate the negative impact:
Signed P. Thomas Designation DC Manager Dated 18/11/13
We have a flexible service that can accommodate different customers’ needs. We promote transparency and can meet those with mobility issues or have difficulty accessing the internet to discuss their concerns or their proposals. We aim to be inclusive and accommodating.
N/A
Equ
Sus
A
uality Im
stainable
Appendix
pact Ass
and
Develop
x B
sessmen
pment C
nt Form
hecklist
EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
Name of policy or change to service (Proposal) Directorate: Department:
Development Control Customer Charter Regeneration & Culture Development Control
Policy author / service lead Name of assessor Date of assessment:
Philip Thomas
1. Have you completed the Equality Challenge form? Yes / No. If No please explain why
2. What is the Aim/s of the Policy or the proposed change to the policy or service (the proposal)
Development Control Customer Charter to improve and publicise our service and the standards our customers can expect from our service.
Yes
3. From your findings from the “Equality Challenge” form did you identify any people or groups of people with protected characteristics that this proposal was likely to affect in a negative way? Please tick appropriate boxes below.
Age No Race No
Disability No Religion or Belief No
Gender reassignment No Sex No
Marriage or civil partnership No Sexual Orientation No
Pregnancy and maternity No Welsh Language No
4. Please give details of any consultation(s) or engagement carried out in the development /re-development of this proposal.
5. Please list the data that has been used for this proposal? eg Household survey data, Welsh Govt data, ONS data, MCC service
user data, Staff personnel data etc.
N/A
• A web based consultation which pops up when customers access ‘Planning’ web pages;
• Direct questionnaires to agents and applicants and random sampling questionnaires distributed to the public via One Stop Shops, Libraries, TIC’s, etc.;
• Email survey sent to Town and Community Councils and Council Members
6. As a result did you take any actions to mitigate your proposal? Please give details below.
7. Final stage – What was decided?
No change made to proposal/s – please give details
Slight changes made to proposal/s – please give details
Major changes made to the proposal/s to mitigate any significant negative impact – please give details
Signed…P. Thomas………………………………………Designation…Development Control Manager………………Dated…18-11-13
Re‐wording of some areas to ensure document read fluently.
Minor re‐wording.
N/A
The “Sustainability Challenge” Name of the Officer completing “the Sustainability challenge”
Philip Thomas
Please give a brief description of the aims proposed policy or service reconfiguration
Development Control Customer Charter to improve and publicise our service and the standards our customers can expect from our service.
Name of the Division or service area
Development Control
Date “Challenge” form completed
18-11-13
Aspect of sustainability affected
Negative impact
Please give details
Neutral impact
Please give details
Positive Impact
Please give details
PEOPLE
Ensure that more people have access to healthy food
None None Sustainable planning policies and practice of our service would promote this e.g. provision of allotments, support provision of new shops in accessible locations
Improve housing quality and provision
None None See above
Reduce ill health and improve healthcare provision
None None See above
Promote independence None None See above e.g. provision of granny
annexes.
Encourage community participation/action and voluntary work
None None See above.
Targets socially excluded None None See above
Help reduce crime and fear of crime
None None See above. This issue is a material consideration when considering planning applications.
Improve access to education and training
None None See above.
Have a positive impact on people and places in other countries
None None Employment creation through planning process may benefit workers from abroad.
PLANET
Reduce, reuse and recycle waste and water
None None Sustainable planning policies and practice of our service would promote this.
Reduce carbon dioxide emissions
None None See above.
Prevent or reduce pollution of the air, land and water
None None See above.
Protect or enhance wildlife habitats (e.g. trees, hedgerows, open spaces)
None None Se above.
Protect or enhance visual None None See above.
appearance of environment
PROFIT
Protect local shops and services
None None See above.
Link local production with local consumption
None None See above
Improve environmental awareness of local businesses
None None See above.
Increase employment for local people
None None See above.
Preserve and enhance local identity and culture
None None See above.
Consider ethical purchasing issues, such as Fairtrade, sustainable timber (FSC logo) etc
None Charter would not impact on this area. None.
Increase and improve access to leisure, recreation or cultural facilities
None None See above.
What are the potential negative Impacts
Ideas as to how we can look to MITIGATE the negative impacts (include any reasonable adjustments)
None
The next steps If you have assessed the proposal/s as having a positive impact please give full details below
If you have assessed the proposal/s as having a Negative Impact could you please provide us with details of what you propose to do to mitigate the negative impact:
Signed P. Thomas Dated 18-11-13
The Charter sets standards that our customers can expect us to achieve. The implementation of the standards via the processing of planning applications should lead to positive impacts on the residents of Monmouthshire and beyond.
N/A