1 -d- (a ) AGENDA ITEM No. ..................

To: Education Committee

From: Director of Education

NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL

REPORT

Subject:

Schools for the Millennium : Review of Primary School Provision

Date: September 1998

Summary

This report is an analysis of primary school provision in the authority. It identifies the extent of surplus capacity and catchment area issues. Finally it recommends four issues for priority attention.

Recommendations

The education committee is recommended

(1)

(ii)

(iii)

(i v)

(VI

to note the analysis of current primary school provision and the opportunities which exist for primary school consolidation across the authority. I

to approve the review priorities identified in Section 3 of ths report.

to request the preparation of consultative documents setting out proposals for these priorities.

to note that an analysis of secondary school provision will be submitted to a future meeting of the education committee.

to refer t h s report to the policy and resources committee.

Members wishing firther information about this paper should contact:

Michael O’Neill. Director of Education on 01236 812337 Murdo Maciver. Head of ProvisionsKontracts Services on 01236 8 12268 M Clj

MMISAL Sept. 1998

NORTH LAXARKSHIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

2

2.1

Schools for the Millennium : Review of Primary School Provision

Report bv the Director of Education

BACKGROUND

At its meeting in April 1998 the education committee approved a review of school provision comprising a number of stages. In the first instance the committee agreed that a comprehensive analysis of current provision be undertaken to identify issues requiring attention, includmg geographical areas for possible rationalisation and catchment area arrangements.

The report should also be seen in a wider context. It is part of a strategy to ensure that school provision in North Lanarkshire is fit for the demands of the millennium, including the distribution and number of places, building fabric, accommodation and new technolog!..

T h ~ s paper is an analysis of current primary school provision only. A report on secondaq provision will be submitted to a future meeting.

ISSUES EMERGING FROM THE REVIEW OF PRIMARY PROVISION

For each school statistical lnformation has been collated, as described below and detailed in appendix 1 .

Pupil roll

Appendis 1 includes the current roll (1998) and the roll projected for 2004. No allonmce can be made for future placing requests but the 1998 placing request numbers are included for indicative purposes.

Design Cauacit\.

1

Th~s figure is the maximum number of pupils whch can be accommodated in the building if it is fully occupied by pupils.

Accommodation in school use

In many instances some accommodation withm the building has been allocated to other uses, for example pre-school classes, and as a result only part is currently available to the primap school. This part is shown as the total space available and the use the school makes of t h s area is shown as a percentage.

Accommodation in other use

This is shown as the pupil places allocated to other purposes. The allocation to pre-school classes is shown separately.

Running costs

This is the per pupil cost as used in national statistics. It includes the property costs associated ivith the whole building and therefore premises whch are underused by the prima? school tend to have hgher per pupil running costs.

(0 Future maintenance costs

These 5 year estimates of major maintenance needs ha1.e been provided b!. the department of planning and development to indicate the cost of keeping the building operational. No account is taken of fabric and accommodation upgrading needs.

2.2 Each page in the appendix lists the denominational and non-denominational schools in each geographxal area. The main issues nhich have emerged in each area are shonn under comments. In the main these relate to

(a) the surplus capacity currently available.

(b) issues affecting individual schools, for example pressure on accommodation and concerns about the catchment area arrangements.

2.3 Appendix 2 summarises selected information for each area and for the authorit?. as a whole.

3 PRIORITIES FOR FURTHER ACTION

3.1 Over a period it is anticipated that specific proposals affecting each area, for example school replacements, extension, closures and amalgamations, \vi11 be recommended to the education committee.

3.2 In the first instance, however, it is considered that priorit!. should be given to the following four issues.

3.3 Priman. provision in Cumbemauld 1

The current situation is complex. In aggregate there are too man!. priman. school places in Cumbernauld and closures can be justified on value for mane!. grounds. However, there is also a geographical disparit!, between school location and housing developments. The provision of schools north of the A80 is inadequate and pupils are zoned to reiativel!, distant schools on the south side of the town. It is recommended that an!’ proposals should be based on the following principles.

(a) The provision in the area south of the A80 should be reduced b!. up to 4 schools.

(b) New non-denominational and denominational provision should be provided in the area of current residential developments north of the A80. Currentl!. five sites have been retained in the area for possible educational use. The allocation of.one of these to the new pro\,ision is proposed.

(c) The school catchment areas across Cumbemauld should be redrawn to accommodate the revised distribution of schools. for esample to minimise home-school distances and to maximise safe nalking routes.

3.4

3 3

3.6

4 RECOMiMENDATIONS

The education committee is recommended

(4 The savings generated b!. these proposals. including the capital receipts from sites and the savings from closures should bc used to enhance the remaining schools. In particular the fabric. accommodation and new technolog!. proiision in the oldcr schools require substantial investment. It is emisaged that this U i l l include IT cable netivorking and the proLrision of a \\.ider range of ICT equipment. This n i l1 ensure that the!. are full!. equipped to meet the demands of the future curriculum, including the potential of superhighwa!. developments. As a result chiidreii \\.ill develop greater expertise in the use of IT and ]vi11 niakc greater use of Intemet materials in even.da!. learning.

The associated secondan arrangements for St Alo\.sius PS. Chapclhnll

The current arrangement is that St Alo~sius PS is associated \\it11 St Patrick's HS. Coatbridge Although these links hai,e been \en sffccti\ c cducnrioiiall!. there have been repeated calls from a substantial number of parents for the school to be associated with St Margaret's HS. Airdrie on the grounds that the area is geographicall!. soclall! and economicall! more oriciitatdd to\\ nrds Airdrie

The future of St Icnatius PS. Wishaw

Currentl!., this school is maintained on a n.eathertight basis onl! decision was inherited from the pre\ious authorit!, folio\\ iiig n cic.cis~o~; in October 1990 not to proceed Ivith the closure of the school

This polic!.

The hture of the school non needs to be decided \\.it11 a replacmiait. substantial upgrade or closure being the possible options

Zonins issues i

In various parts of the authonh. there are relativel) niiiior school catchment issues which require to be examined for possible amendment E\anipI<s include the follo\ving

areas school This arrangement makes it difficult for thc authorit! 10 project pupil rolls and for head teachers to develop liilks n ith parents before school enrolment stage

hich are included in the catchment of more tlinii on: priman

catchment boundaries requiring review because of subscqudnt housing development. Where developments occur on preiiousl!. \ x a n t land the eslsting school catchments nil1 neither take accoLiiit of school roll implications or be responsive to road patterns.

North Lanarkshire areas n.hich are zoned to priiiian schools iii other authorities.

(i) to note the anal!.sis of current priman. school provision and the opportunities jihich exist for priman. school consolidation across the authorih..

( i i ) to appr0i.e the review priorities identified in Section 3 of this report

(iii) to request the preparation of consultative documents setting out proposals for these priorities.

(k.) to note that an analjsis of secondan. school provision vi11 be submitted to a future meeting of the education committee.

(v) to refer t h l s report to the polic!. and resources committee

MMISAL Sept 1998

I

School Auchinloch P Chryston P Gartcosh P Glenmanor P Stepps P

TOTAL

Comments

Roll (1998) lncludlng Placing

Requests 41

Review of Chryston ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1

Roll (2004) Excluding

Future Placing

Requests 35

-I Design

4et Placing Capacity 01 Requests I the :I998 Only) Building

4 132

Accommodation in School

al Runnlng Cost

132 31% €3,587 198 159 2 297 297 67% 81 104 4 198 198 41%

288 273 -2 462 429 67% 33 329 366 15 363 363 91%

937 937 23 1452 1419 59% 33

Surplus Desian Capacity 1515 places (c.1 school)

Surdus accommodation potentially available for Drimarv school use - 482 places (c. 1 school)

Pupils from proposed development at Stepps (440) cannot all be accommodated at Stepps Primary.

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding

€116.849 upgrading)

€1 ,885 €307.407 €2.604 €237.106 €1 ,891 €294.255 €1.664 €322,265

€2.326 E l ,277.882

Review of Cumbernauld ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-2

* tenance Costs

f151.760 Carbrain P 294 260 -37 462 462 64% f 1,824 f106.325 Condorrat P 280 258 13 462 462 61 % f 1,597 6266,459 Cumbemauld P 388 447 41 396 396 98% f 1,531 f279,230 Easseld P 399 328 12 528 528 76% f 1,534 f46.425 Glenhead P 21 9 291 -14 462 462 47% f 1,964 €566,226 Kildrum P 319 286 5 462 462 69% f 1,734 f 559.225 Langlands 185 317 -1 6 462 429 43% €2.158 f 567,725 Melrose P 175 139 -2 462 462 38% f2,036 f299,700 Ravenswood P 295 272 0 396 396 74% f 1,683 f336.700

f 194,352 Westfield P 202 292 -6 462 396 51 yo €1,855 Whitelees P 293 319 -1 462 462 63% f 1,696 f247.469

Baird Memorial P 177 128 5 462 396 45% 66 f2.002

TOTAL 3526 3553 4 5940 5775 61 Yo

Comments

(1) Surdus Desiqn CaDacity : 2414 (c. 5 schools)

(2) Surdus accommodation Dotentially available for primary school use - 2249 places (c. 4/5 schools)

33

66

f4.013.639 f 1,799

(3) Zoning of Curnbernauld north areas to schools south of the A80 is unsatisfactory.

Review of Kilsyth ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-3

Roll (1998) Including Placing

Requests 294

Banton P 51 Chapelgreen P 65 Kilsyth P 228

Roll (20041 Excluding

Future Placing

Requests 268 49 71

297

4 462 4 132 0 132 -5 264

alntenance CO

462 64 % f 1,657 f 1 13,480 132 39% 132 49% 264 86%

f3,069 f 184,305 f2.819 f 130,250 f 1,862 f31.950

Total 638 685 3 990 990 59% f2.352 f459.985 '

Comments

(1) Sumlus DesiQn Cap& : 352 places (c. 1 small school)

(2) Surolus accommodation wtentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 352 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Chryston RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-4

~ i a c i n o I Piacin I Requests 1 the

SI Barbara's F 162 150 3 231 St Joseph's P St Michael's P

231 70% f2,269 213 259 0 23 1 231 92% 288 351 1 462 429 67% 33

TOTAL 663 760 4 924 891 76% 33

Comments

(1) Surplus Desiqn Capacity : 261 places (c. 1 small school)

(2) Sumlus accommodation ootentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 228 places(c. 1 small school)

(3) Pupils from proposed developments at Stepps (440 houses) cannot all be accommodated at St Joseph's Primary.

(4) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Barbra's Primary is zoned to a school in East Dunbartonshire.

(5) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Joseph's Primary is zoned to a school in East Dunbartonshire.

0

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding upgrading) €719,059

f 1,767 f 39,750 f 1,782 €450.472

El ,940 f 1,209.281

Review of Cumbernauld RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-5

Roll (1998) Including Placing

School I Requests Sacred Heart P 190 St Francis of Assisi P 152 St Helen's P 304 St Joseph's P 172 St Lucy's P 184 St Mary's P 279

aintenance Cost

Total Runnlng Cost (excluding upgrading) Per School Pupll

198 -2 462 363 52% 99 f2,730 f 454,09C 132 8 23 1 23 1 66% f 1,979 fl12,815 233 2 462 396 77% 66 f 1,707 f 192.370

f449.525 173 5 462 396 43% 66 f2.087 190 0 462 363 51 % 99 f3,144 f609.663 423 7 462 396 70% 33 33 f 1,701 f510.550

Total 1281 1349 20 2541 2145 60% 165 231 f2,225 f2,329,013

Comments

(1) S m :I260 (c. 213 schools)

(2) SurDlus accommodation potentially available for primarv school use - 864 places (c. 2 schools)

Roll (19981 Including Placing

Requests 217

Review of Kilsyth RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-6

253 -4 264 St Patrick's PS 339 343 8 792 594 57% 198

Total 556 596 4 1056 858 70% 198

Comments

(1) Sumlus Desicln CaDacity : 500 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Sumlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drirnarv school use - 302 places (c. 1 small school)

ation in Other. I

f2.025 f707,630

f1.941 f934.935

Review of Kilsyth RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-6

St Patrick’s PS 339 343 8 792 594 57% 198 E2.025 E707.630

Total 556 596 4 1056 858 70% 198 El ,941 E934.935

Comments

(1) Surolus Desiqn Capacity : 500 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surolus accommodation Dotentiallv available for primarv school use - 302 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Airdrie ND Primary Schools \

Appendix 1-7

Chapelside P Clarkston P Dunrobin P Golfhill P Petersburn P Rochsolloch P Tollbrae P Victoria P

TOTAL

256 373 293 209 138 222 365 219

21 85

273 30 1 357 229 100 203 354 156

2101

5 6 1 -2 -8 9 -4 -7

-1

462 396 462 297 462 363 462 462

3663

462 396 429 297 330' 363 462 297

3267

Comments

/1) Suralus desicln caoacitv : 1385 places (c. 314 schools)

[2) Sumlus accommodation aotentiallv available for orimatv school use - 989 Dlaces Ic. 2/3 schools)

(3) There is accommodation pressure at Clarkston Primary.

55% 94% 68% 70% 42% 61 % 79% 74%

66%

f 1,898 f1.564

33 f 1,706 f1.911

132 f2,309 f1.816 f 1,656

66 99 ' f 1,851

66 330 f 1,883

€474,745 f355.945 f 371,720 f401,435 €479.030 €341.485 €452.1 65 €465.429

f 3.626.059

Review of Coatbridge ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-8

Gartsherrie P Greenhill P Kirkshaws P

Roll (1998) Including Placing

Requests 165

Roll (20d4) Excluding

Future Placing

Requests 188

Accot. iiodation in Scho . Use (Pupil Places)

Net Placing Capacity of Requests 1 the Total Space %Actually

(1998 Only) Building Available Used -1 231 231 71%

Design

-

Acc.onimod:ition i t 1 Other Use Pupil Places

Pre-School I Others

228 156 10 231 231 99%

199 225 -1 467 3% 50% 66 203 196 0 231 23 1 88%

I id hionLland t' I L i 8 121 1 462 33u 45% 33

Sikeside P 117 146 -9 23 1 165 71 % 66 Townhead P 98 104 -1 297 198 49% 66

Shawhead P 144 162 -3 165 165 87%

TOTAL 1544 1586 -1 2673 2310 70% 23 1

Comments

(1) : 1129 places (c. 213 schools)

'(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 766 places (c. 112 schools)

99

33

132

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

Total Running Cost (excluding upgrading) -

f 1,855 f106.325

f 1,721 f 31 9,697 f 1,625 ~69,806

f 2 117 ~484.4 50

€2,168 €301.556 f2.196 f 11,325

f2.619 f254.340 f2.510 ~205.208

f2,052 f2.216.106

(3) There is accommodation pressure at Gaitsherrie Primary.

Review of Monklands Rural ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-9

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

Total Running Cost

Calderbank P 67 75 2 165 165 41 % f2.667 f183.321 Chapelhall P 187 262 -3 528 429 44% 99 f2.035 f639.288 Glenboig P 66 60 0 132 132 50% f2,855 f 103.385 Glengowan P 114 107 0 231 198 58% 33 f2.246 f 178.465 Greengairs P 1 1 1 136 1 23 1 23 1 48% f2,237 f 160,516 New Monkland P 193 191 -1 297 297 65% f 1,879 f457.312 Plains P 80 82 1 231 198 40% f2.656 f135.362 TOTAL 938 913 0 1815 1650 50% 132 f2.343 fl.857.649

33 33

Comments

(1) Surplus Desion Capacity : 997places (c. 2 schools)

(2) Surdus accommodation ootentiallv available for priman, school use - 832 places (c. 112 schools)

Review of Airdrie RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 0

Alexandra P 33 1 314 St Andrew's P St Dominic's P St Edward's P St Serfs P

240 21 6 159 21 7 247 261 282 298

2 429 363 66% 66 -3 330 264 60% 66 2 396 363 68% 33 -24 495 429 66% 66

5 Year Plan Total Running Cost (excluding

f 1,568 €658,809 f 1,934 f472,353 f2.217 f 363,230 f 1,786 f 375.320 f1.971 f248.321

TOTAL 1259 1306 -4 1980 1749 72% f 1,895 f2,118,033

Comments

(1) Surplus Desiqn Capacity : 721 places (c. 2 schools)

(2) Sumlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimary school use - 490 places (c 1 school)

(3) As a result of the high number of placing requests there are concerns about the ability of Alevandra Primary to accommodate all its zoned intake.

St Baiholomew's P St Bemard's P St James' P St Mary's P St Monica's P St Patrick's P St Stephen's P St Timothy's P

262 187 208 226 349 412 187 232

Review of Coatbridge RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 1

230 120 147 142 260 380 308 276

-2 4 -1 5 0 14 -12 -19 2

363 264 429 330 495 429 462 396

72% 71 %

68% 48%

71% 96% 40% 59%

St Augustine's P 452 447 5 462 462 98% f 1.587 f494.085 396 264 462 330 528 462 462 462

TOTAL 2515 2310 -23

Comments

(1) Surdus DesiQn CaDacity :1313 places (c. 2/3 schools)

3828 3630 69%

33

66

99

33 f 1,938 f 1,949

33 f2,106 f 1,723

33 f1.815 f 1,561 f2,177 f2.149

f 566.725 f359.654 f437.568 f133.017 '

f 294.638 f 174.135 f319,911 f433.409

99 f 1,889 €3,213,142

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 1155 places (c. 2/3 schools)

(3) There is accommodation pressure at St Augustine's Primary.

(4) There is accommodation pressure at St Patrick's Primary.

Review of Monklands Rural RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 2

150 0 396 330 35% 66 f2.414 f246.440 116

257 22 1 0 792 495 52% 297 f1,917 f 1,094,233 195 177 -1 396 330 59% 33 33 f2.044 f 322,474 123 90 0 231 231 53% f2.234 f220.611

f282,914

Our Lady & St Joseph's P St Aloysius' P St David's P St Kevin's P

St May's P 82 98 -1 231 23 1 35% f2.527

TOTAL 866 826 0 2277 1782 49%

Comments

(1) Surplus Desiqn Canacity : 1415places (c. 3/4 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 920 places (c. 2 schools)

165 330 f2,268 f2,431,025

-

ratiomxls

Review of Bellshill ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 3

I costs

Bewiaere P Lawmuir P Mossend P Noble P

1 53 75 -Y 297 231 66% 66

312 374 16 462 396 79% 66 307 332 2 462 396 78% 66

449 421 4 462 462 97%

TOTAL 1221 1202 13 1683 1485 80% 188

Comments

(1 1 Surplus desian capacitv : 462 places (c. 1 school)

(21 Surplus accommodation potentiallv available for primarv school use : 264 places (c. 1 small school)

(3) Part of the catchment area of Belvidere PS and Lawmuir PS is shared with parents being able to select either option.

f2.090 f 348,230 El ,597 f281.700 f 1,660 €250,075 f 1,774 f 735.593

f 1,615,598 f 1.780

(4) There is accommodation pressure at Lawmuir Primary.

Review of HarthiII/Shotts ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-14

Roll (1998) Excluding Including Future

School Allantcn P 122 110 Benhar P Dykehead P Harthill P Kirk 0' Shotts Stane P

TOTAL

Comments

134 124 352 333 156 149 80 120 172 182

1016 1018

ntenance Costs

1 23 1 231 53% €2.216 €216,605 -1 231 23 1 58% f2.177

f61.190 -1 462 462 76% f1,715 0 297 231 68% 66 f2.064 0 198 198 40% f2.607 f303.280 0 297 297 58% f 1,929 €283,915

-1 1716 1650 59%

(1) SurDlus Desiqn CaDacity : 700 places (c. 1/2 schools)

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimaw school use - 634 places (c. 1/2 schools)

(3) Replacement school for Benhar/Harthill Primary currently being constructed.

66 f 866,990 f2,118

Review of Motherwell ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 5

Accommodation in Other Use Pupil Places

Total Running Cost Per School Pupil

f 1,761

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding upgrading) €430,020

Glencairn P Knowetop P Ladywell P Logans P Muirhouse P Muir Street P

192 126 8 462 330 58% 99 33 f2.807 €470.886 521 417 35 495 429 100% 66 f 1,696 f 775,029 310 278 -5 330 330 94% f 1,710 f40,500 199 248 12 23 1 231 86% El ,903 f296.290 141 180 -28 462 330 43% 132 €2,377 €828,478 210 177 -27 528 429 49% 99 €1,914 f 565.557

TOTAL 1824 1625 0 2871 2442 71 % 99 330 f2.024 f 3,407,660

Comments

(1) Surplus Desion Capacity : 1047places (c. 2 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodation potentiallv available for primaw school use - 635 places (c. 1 school)

(3) There is severe accommodation pressure at Knowetop Primary because of placing requests.

Review of Motherwell Rural ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 6

Maintenance Costs

Holytown P 295 21 6 -1 8 462 396 74% 66 El ,791 f 530,970 Keir Hardie P 192 153 -5 264 264 73% f 1,849 f301.936 Newarthill P 162 182 4 231 23 1 70% f 1,935 f218.171

f 399,720 New Stevenston P 226 222 7 396 297 76% 99 f1,819

TOTAL 1000 895 -1 5 1584 1419 70% 165 f1.871 f 1,599,257

Comments

(1) Surplus Desiqn Capacity : 584 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus accommodation potentially available for primary school use - 419 places (c. 1 school)

L

Review of UddingstonNiewpark ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 7

202 5 231 231 92% f 1 .e02

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding

f23.310 f485,825

Tannochside P 322 296 4 462 396 81 Yo 66 El ,664 f686.290 Burnhead P 21 8 196 -8 660 363 60% 198 99 f2,221

TOTAL 753 694 1 1353 990 7 8% 264 99 f 1,896 f 1,195,425

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desicln Capacity : 600 places (c. 1 school)

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimaw school use - 237 places (c. 1 small school)

(3) The catchment area of Tannochside Primary includes an area located in South Lanarkshire.

Review of Wishaw ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 8

Berryhill P Cambusnethan P Castlehill P Coltness P Lammermoor P Morningside P Netherton P Newmains P Overtown P Thomlie P Wishaw Academy P

187 300 121 I91 21 3 100 130 272 189 202 338

225 349 234 157 276 189 125 336 154 149 343

-16 9

-1 6 2 8 4 9 -3 7 -3 8

462 363 462 462 462 231 198 429 198 231 396

363 363 264 396 264 23 1 198 330 198 231 396

52% 99 83% 46% 66 132 48% 66 81 % 33 165 43% 66% 82% 99 95% 87% 85%

TOTAL 2243 2537 9 3894 3234 70% 264

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desian CaDacity : 1651 places (c. 3/4 schools)

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for priman/ school use - 991 places (c. 2 schools)

(3) Part of the catchment area of Newmains PS and Morningside PS is shared with parents being able to select either option

(4) An area adjacent to the catchment area of Morningside Primary is zoned to a school located in South Lanarkshire

297

f2.358 f 1,567 f2.968 f2,204 f 1,833 f2,337 f2,008 f 1,792 f 1,739 f 1,839 f 1,594

f2.035

256.155- f313.110 f576.668 f 553,930 f 524.592 f 327,920 f 114.210 f374,022 f 129.735 f 336.940 f314,935

f3.822.217

(5) There is accommodation pressure at Overtown Primary

Sacred Heart P 356 St Gerard's P 197

Review of Bellshill RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 9

331 -8 462 429 83% 33 f 1,776 €341,614 163 0 462 297 66% 66 99 €1 ,934 f349,855

TOTAL 821 749 4 1320 1122 72% 66 132 f 1,787 €1,032,169

Comments

(1) SurDlus desian capacity : 499 places (c. 1 school)

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drirnarv school use : 301 Dlaces(c. 1 small school)

Review of HarthiII/Shotts RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-20

' TOTAL 297 176 -1 429 429 69% f 1,760 f225.525

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desicln CaDacity : 132 places

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drirnary school use - 132 places

Review of Motherwell RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-21

intenance Costs

St Bemadette's P 206 185 -4 462 330 62% St Brendan's P 184 220 -2 462 297 62%

132 €2,037 f 401,150 f831.730 165 f2.052

TOTAL 824 826 -2 1419 1122 71% 297 f 1,887 f 1,522,092

Comments

(1) Surolus Desian Capacity : 595 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surc~lus accommodation potentiallv available for Drimaw school use - 298 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Motherwell Rural RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-22

150 11 264 198 80% 66 158 168 131 -1 297 231 73% 66

Our Lady's & St Francis P St Mary's P St Patrick's P 169 223 0 231 198 85% 33 St Teresa's P 313 358 -8 429 429 73%

f333,464 €1,895 €2,022 f 329.952 f 1,937 f 504,260 El ,711 €415.686

f1.815.657 1022 1031 -1 4 1617 1452 73% 165 €1.884 TOTAL

Comments

(1) Sumlus Desian Capacitv : 507 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surdus accommodation Dotentiallv available for orirnarv school use - 430 places (c. 1 small school)

(3) The catchment area of Tannochside Primary includes an area located in South Lanarkshire.

Review of UddingstonNiewpark RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-23

Maintenance CO

€2,282 €291.865

€2,053 €816,430

St Gabriel's P

TOTAL

135 120 1 23 1 231 58%

446 430 2 627 561 76% 66

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desiqn Capacity : 181 places

(2) Surplus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimary school use - 115 places

(3) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Columba's Primary is zoned to a school located in South Lanarkshire.

LLS'LSO'Z3 PL8'13 E€ %p9 P161 LP6 1 z 09z 1 LOZl 1v101

SZS'OOS3 ZS8'13 %9S Z9P Z9P Z- P6Z 6SZ d ,seUWl IS POZ d S,MallUefllS

9ZZ'98€3 806' 13 %PL CEZ 1EZ Z- ZZZ ZL 1 d ,sn!leufil IS CPE.6623 OE6'13 % L9 OEE OEE E SSZ OZZ d S,P!fiU8 1s

0 0 0 ' Z Z S 3 990'23 E€ %8P 6Zt Z9P 1 LL 1

a

0 t

AI’PEN1)IX 2 AREA ANALYSIS OF PlUMARY SCHOOL PROVISION

nl . m a _I

4 I

t- U 0 I M Q