Date post: | 31-Mar-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dinhkhuong |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Agenda
Update on FAA Office of Airports leadership team
Update on the system of airports
Major drivers of change
Planning issues including the new NPIAS Report
Environmental issues
Financial issues
Status of reauthorization and appropriation
Continued focus on core principles, objectives and m1ss1on
Office of Airports-Headquarters Management Team Associate Administrator (ARP1)
Office of Airports Eduardo Angeles
Deputy Associate Administrator (ARP-2) Office o1f Airports
Benito De Leon
Senior Advisor Winsome Lenfert
Executive Officer (ARP-10) Sabreenah Key
Director (APP-1) Office of Airport Planning and Programming
Elliott Black
Director (AC0-1) Airport Compliance and Management Analysis
Kevin Willis
Manager (AC0-100) Airports Compliance Division
Vacant
Director (AAS-1) Office of Airport Safety and Standards
Mike O'Donnell
NOTE: We also have two other execs in on detail: Timothy Butters (from PHMSA),
as an advisor to Eddie Angeles Daphne Fuller (from AGC), as an
advisor to Ben Deleon
Office of Airports-Regional Offices Associate Administrator (ARP1)
Office of Airports Eduardo Angeles
Alaska AAL-600
Byron Huffman
601 Kristi Warden
Central ACE-600
Jim Johnson
610 Ed Hyatt
620 Rodney Joel
Eastern AEA-600
Steve Urlass
601 Vacant)
610 Vacant
620 Mahendra Raghubeer
Great Lakes AGL-600
Susan Mowery-Schalk
601 Chris Hugunin
610 Rich Kula
620 Birke Rhodes
New England ANE-600
Mary Walsh
601 Bryon Rakoff
620 Gail Lattrell
Northwest Mountain ANM-600
Randy Fiertz
610 Stan Allison
620 Carol Suomi
Southern AS0-600
Vacant
601 Steve Hicks
610 Troy Butler
620 Maverick Douglas
Southwest ASW-600
Ignacio Flores
610 Cameron Bryan
620 Joe Washington
Western Pacific AWP-600
Mark McClardy
601 Robin Hunt
610 Mia Ratcliff
620 Brian Armstrong
NOTE: The roles of 610 and 620 Branch Managers have become somewhat less consistent from Region to Region than they once were. Therefore, the scope of responsibilities will likely vary from one region to another.
Office of Airports-Airports District Offices {ADO's) Associate Administrator (ARP1)
Office of Airports Eduardo Angeles
Alaska AAL-600
Byron Huffman
Not applicable
Central ACE-600
Jim Johnson
Not applicable
Eastern AEA-600
Steve Urlass
New York (Evelyn Martinez)
Washington (Matt Thys)
Harrisburg (Lori Pagnanelli)
Beckley* (Matt DiGiulian)
Great Lakes AGL-600
Susan Mowery-Schalk
Chicago (Jim Keefer)
Detroit (John Mayfield)
Minneapolis (Andy Peek)
Bismarck* (Lori Suttmeier)
New England ANE-600
Mary Walsh
Not applicable
Northwest Mountain ANM-600
Randy Fiertz
Seattle (Joelle Briggs)
Denver (John Bauer)
Helena (Dave Stelling)
Southern AS0-600
Vacant
Atlanta (Larry Clark)
Memphis (Phillip Braden)
Jackson (Rans Black)
Orlando (Bart Vernace)
Southwest ASW-600
Ignacio Flores
Texas (Ben Guttery)
Oklahoma-Arkansas (Glenn Boles)
Louisiana-New Mexico (Lacey Spriggs)
Western Pacific AWP-600
Mark McClardy
Los Angeles (Dave Cushing)
San Francisco (Jim Lomen)
Honolulu (Ron Simpson)
Phoenix (Mike Williams)
The Beckley office is considered part of the Washington ADO, and Bismarck is considered part of the "Minnesota-Dakotas" ADO. We've kept them listed here separately so we have a complete listing of all ADOs and associated field offices.
FAA's interrelated areas of concern
Standards With A TO, AVS, RSO
Environmental With AEE, ATO, AGC, AGI
Engineering With ATO, AVS, RSO
Compliance With AGC, AGI
Major drivers of change
Continued economic recovery
Continued challenges in predicting airline business activity
Continued transition to newer, larger aircraft
Continued increase in concentration of commercial air service
Slower growth in operations everywhere else
Continued interest in optimizing non-aeronautical revenues
Continued focus on environmental and economic sustainability
Less money available for capital projects
Effect of changes in fleet and flight schedules on noise contours
Continued focus on efficient and cost-effective use of Federal funds
Continued focus on enhancing consistency
New users in the system and associated issues
Continued concentration of flight operations Only six (6) of the 30 largest airports had more operations in CY-2015 than in CY-2005
VI Q. 0 'i 1V ~
G> E E 0 u I.I\ 0 0 N
>.... LL 0 t, Cl.
140.0%
120.0%
00.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
X \ Airport Planning & Cap,
f- ~ C O CD www.faa.gov/a1rports/planning_capacity/ := Apps ~ BMC Remedy Mid - , +" FlightAware ~ Google Maps t~ Currency Converter II City Pair Program (CF Shoplet.com II Per Diem Rates Loo
j
Airports
FAA Home Airports Planning & Capacity
Airport Compliance
Airport Cooperative Research Program
Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
Airport Safety
Engineering Design & Construc tion
Environmental Program
Major Airport Development
News & Information
Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Program
Planning & Capacity ..
Airports GIS and eALP
Airport Planning & Capacity Airports
Airport planning encompasses capacity. master and regional planning. aviation forecastin!
Activit ies include providing planning guidance. producing the biennial National Plan of lnte
developing capacity studies. collecting boarding and cargo data to determine airport cate~
through the development of tools such as the eALP.
Accessible Airport Facilities
Airport Capacity Profiles
Airports GIS Program
FACT3: Airport Capacity Needs in the National Airspace System (PDF)
General Aviation Airports Reports (ASSET 1 and ASSET 2)
Joint Civilian/Military (Joint-Use) Airports
I National Pian Of Integrated Alrport svslems (NPtAS)I Non-Federally Owned Air Navigation Aids (added 6/8/201 6)
Surplus Property and Military Base Conversions for Airport Purposes
http:Shoplet.comwww.faa.gov/a1rports/planning_capacity
The U.S. system of airports as ofSeptember 30, 2016
19,536 airports overall
14,400 airports designated as private-use
5,136 airports open to the public
3,332 existing airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems ("NPIAS")
543 airports certificated under Part 139 (commercial service by aircraft with 9 or more seats)
382 primary airports (scheduled commercial service with at least 10,000 annual enplanements)
Large Hub (>1.0% ofall enplanements) 30 71% Atlanta, DFW, Denver, Houston, LAX, Miami, etc.
Medium Hub (0.25 - 1.0% of all enplanements) 31 17% Albuquerque, Austin, Dallas Love, New Orleans, etc .
Small Hub (0.05 - 0.25% of all enplanements) 72 9% Little Rock, Oklahoma City, Midland, etc.
Non-Hub (>10,000 enplanements, but less than 249 3% Baton Rouge, Lawton, 0.05% ofall enplanements) Texarkana, Roswell, etc.
Subtotal-Primary airports 382
General Aviation-National 89 Meacham, Wiley Post, etc.
General Aviation-Regional 530 Clovis, Drake Field, etc.
General Aviation-Local 1,262 Chennault, Conway, etc.
General Aviation-Basic 813 South Grand Lake, etc.
General Aviation-Unclassified 256
Subtotal-Nonprimary airports 2,950 0.1%
Total-existing NPIAS airports 3,332 100% As of October 1, 2015
>,.... ca E .:::: 0.
>, lo.. ~
E lo..
a. C 0 z
Environmental matters
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
The Historical Record: Order of Magnitude Noise Exposure Reduction Despite
Traffic Growth 8.000
- 7.000 "'C 0 6.000--~- 5.000 C1)-C. 0 4.000 C1) a. ~ 3.0000 ~ C1) .c 2.000 E ::s z 1.000
0.000 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 200i0 2005 2012 2013 2014
Environmental matters
Noise
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Community engagement
Multiple strategies for addressing aviation noise
Reduce noise at the source
Maintain or update noise standards
Advance Performance-Based Navigation (PBN)
Noise Compatibility Planning (Part 150)
Community roundtables
Noise-based access restrictions (Part 161)
Noise mitigation
Reduce noise at the source
Most effective means of reducing noise-i.e ,from 7 million in 1975 to fewer than 400,000 people affected today.
Support R&D (CLEEN program)
Provide technical input for Congressional consideration.
Acquire quieter and more fuel-efficient aircraft
Also involves aircraft en ine manufacturers.
Plan facilities to accommodate more modern and efficient aircraft
Maintain or update noise standards
Ensure standard approaches to measuring noise for aircraft, airports and communit ies.
Conduct research and facilitate policy analysis
Work with !CAO to harmonize worldwide standards
Provide feedback on proposed changes in standards.
Provide feedback on proposed changes in standards.
Provide feedback on proposed changes in standards.
Advance Performance-Based Navigation (PBN)
More accurate flight tracks means fewer people affected by noise (and less emissions).
Design and implement modified arrival and departure f light tracks
Acquire necessary technology and adhere to operational changes
Coordinate airport planning with FAA and other stakeholders
Suggest noise abatement procedures for FAA consideration.
Engage to understand balance between safety, airport access, efficiency and economic benefits.
Engage in coordinated land-use planning and zoninQ.
Noise Compatibility Planning (Part 150)
All stakeholders engaged and coordinated.
Tangible measures to reduce effects of noise.
Ensures full disclosure of noise contours.
Fund studies Active participation by
air traffic controllers as well as other parts of the FAA.
Review (and either approve or disapprove)
ro sed measures.
Actively participate to evaluate proposed measures and provide technical input
Decide whether to conduct formal Part 150 program.
Actively participate and propose measures.
Propose and monitor voluntary restrictions.
Actively participate to and propose and evaluate measures.
Minimize incompatible land uses.
Community roundtables
Opportunity for inputfrom all affected communit ies.
Can provide technicalinput if requested.
Can provide technical input if requested.
Decide whether to support a roundtable.
May actively host, lead or facilitate dialo ue.
Decide whether and how to participate.
Noise-based access restrictions (Part 161)
Limited benefits and significant impediments
Evaluate proposed restrictions for compliance with statute limitations.
Eva I uate and provide input on operational impacts.
Decide whether to propose mandatory restrictions.
Comment on proposed restrictions before FAA review.
Noise mitigation
Can help relocate people living within the designated contour
Can help sound insulate eligible homes and schools.
Can provide Federal financial assistance to airports if certain requirements are met.
Decide whether to support noise mitigation efforts.
May participate financially depending upon relationship with airport owner-operator.
$32.5 billion needed over the next five years (2017-2021)
1/o reduction from the previous estimate (2015-2019)
$6.5 billion average annual AIP-eligible capital needs
2.0x need versus the amount of AIP available in recent years
FY-2008 AIP grant program structure In $ millions. Initial formulas based on authorizing statute and FY-2008 appropriated amounts.
Capacity-Safety-SecurityNoise $355.7 10.5%
Primary Entitlements $839.7 24.7%
argo Entitlements $118.8 3.5%
Alaska Supplemental $21.4 0.6%
Nonprimary Entitlements $409.6 12.1%
State Apportionment $269.4 7.9%
Protected Entitlements $467.9 13.8%
Small A irport Fund $482.2 14.2%
Noise $275.0 8.1%
Relieve$5.2
___
.,_.....___ C
Military Airport Program r $31.4
FY-2016 AIP grant program structure In $ millions. Initial formulas based on authorizing statute and FY-2016 appropriated amounts. Any entitlements carried over during FY-2016 will be converted to addit ional "Remaining Discretionary" (with corresponding amounts then protected for those sponsors in FY-2017).
Capacity-Safety-Security
Noise $182.4 5.7% Remaining Discretionary
$60.8 1.9%
Primary Entitlements $832.4 26.1 %
Cargo Entitlements $111.7 3.5%
Alaska Supplemental $21.3 0.7%
Nonprimary Entitlements $380.9 11.9%
State Apportionment $257.4 8.1 %
Protected Entitlements $680.7 21.3%
Small Airport Fund $504.3 15.8%
Noise $141.1 4.4%
Reliever $2.7
___
---
Sources of uncertainty
Airline consolidation and strategy
Trends in general aviation (including effects of drones)
FAA reauthorization
Federal budget pressures
Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs)
Carryover
CAUTION!
The following slides do not represent a complete, stand-alone presentation-they are purely supporting graphics that cannot be effectively presented without supporting explanation.
The presenter is a Trained Professional and uses special equipment not available at any retail establishment or under any generic name or store brand.
Do not attempt this at home.
(Oh, and most of the numbers are made up.)
How carryover affects discretionary funds (cont'd)
$3,000.0
$2,500.0
$2,000.0 '4'.:.--.... _.... ..
;;;;;;;;a===;;;;;;;;;;; - .. ... . ..:.-..~- .... ::: $1 ,500.0 $1 ,000.0
$500.0
$0.0 --- --- -----r-------'_ __..____~------- ----, Year 1 formulas Year 1 actuals Year2
Primary Entitlements $800.0 $500.0 $800.0
Cargo Entitlements $120.0 $120.0 $120.0
Nonprimary Entitlements $400.0 $200.0 $400.0
State Apportionment $250.0 $250.0 $250.0
Protected Entitlements $500.0
Remaining Available forDiscretiona
$1 ,550.0 $2,050.0 $1 ,050.0
All figures are illustrative.
History of authorizing legislation
Airport and Airway Improve-mentAct 1982 ..
..
..
..
.. I
1987 Airport andAirway Safety and Capacity Expansion Act
Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act 1990
1992 Airport and Airway Safety, Capacity, NoiseImprovement and lntermodal Transportation Act
Federal Aviation Reauth. Act 1996
2000 AIR-21
Vision 100 2003
2007 Authorization
expired 9/30/2007
(followed by 23 shorl-term
extensions spanning 4. 5
years)
2012 FAA Modernization and Reform Act
You are here
Nov 2016
Impacts of repeated short-term extensions
Impact Categories
State aeronautical
agencies Airport
sponsors Consulting community
Contracting community FAA
Difficulty planning ./ ./ ./ ./ ./
Impacts to bid cycles ./ ./ ./ ./
Uncertainty about entitlements and carryover
./ ./ ./
Increased phasing ./ ./ ./ ./ ./
Protracted construction ./ ./ ./
More potential construction impacts ./ ./ ./ ./
Phased projects can drive increased mobilization costs
./ ./
Delayed bidding can erode competitive bid environment
./
Increased costs means less infrastructure built
./ ./ ./ ./ ./
Problems with material suppliers and subcontractors
./
More grants to administer ./ ./ ./ ./
Continued focus on core principles
Safety: - Reducing runway incursions
-Minimizing damage connected with runway excursions
-Wildlife hazards
- Other risks
Enhancing capacity and optimizing efficiency
Preservation of infrastructure
Environmental and economic sustainability
Financial accountability
Preserving stakeholder confidence
Critical value of planning
Slide Number 1Slide Number 2AgendaOffice of AirportsHeadquarters Management TeamOffice of AirportsRegional OfficesOffice of AirportsAirports District Offices (ADOs)Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS)Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22How carryover affects discretionary funds (contd)History of authorizing legislationImpacts of repeated short-term extensionsContinued focus on core principlesSlide Number 27