M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2016\02 Feb 24 CAC pg.docx Page 1 of 4

AGENDA

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Notice

Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016; 6:00 p.m.

Location: Transportation Authority Hearing Room, 1455 Market Street, Floor 22

Members: Christopher Waddling (Chair), Peter Sachs (Vice Chair), Myla Ablog, Becky Hogue, Brian Larkin, John Larson, Santiago Lerma, John Morrison, Jacqualine Sachs and Peter Tannen

Page

6:00 1. Committee Meeting Call to Order

6:02 2. Chair’s Report – INFORMATION

6:05 Consent Calendar

3. Approve the Minutes of the January 27, 2016 Meeting – ACTION* 5

4. State and Federal Legislative Update – INFORMATION* 11

Every month, we provide an update on state and federal legislation and, when appropriate, seekrecommendations to adopt new positions on active legislation. The attached matrix tracks the latestactivity on state bills and the positions previously adopted by the Transportation Authority. At itsFebruary 9 meeting, the Finance Committee recommended the following new positions: support onAssembly Bill (AB) 1574 (Chiu), AB 1591 (Frazier), Senate Bill 812 (Hill) and SB 824 (Beall); and opposeon AB 1550 (Gomez), AB 1641 (Allen), Assembly First Extraordinary Session (ABX1) 18 (Linder) andABX1 25 (Allen).

5. Citizens Advisory Committee Appointments – INFORMATION

The Plans and Programs Committee will consider recommending appointment of two members to theCitizens Advisory Committee (CAC) at its March 15 meeting. The vacancies are the result of theresignation of Wells Whitney and the term expiration of John Larson, who is seeking reappointment.Neither staff nor CAC members make recommendations regarding CAC appointments. CACapplications can be submitted through the Transportation Authority’s website at www.sfcta.org/cac.

End of Consent Calendar

6:10 6. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Approval of the 2016 Prop AA Call forProjects Programming Recommendations Totaling $2,192,934 for Five Projectsand Amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan – ACTION* 39

Prop AA generates revenues from a $10 vehicle registration fee on motor vehicles registered in SanFrancisco to fund transportation improvements consistent with a 2012 voter-approved expenditure plan.One of the features of Prop AA is a focus on quick-to-deliver projects that bring tangible benefits toneighborhoods citywide. Correspondingly, the 2012 Strategic Plan policies allow for periodic calls forprojects to reprogram cost savings or funds from programmed projects that failed to request funds in atimely manner. In November we issued a call for projects to program $1,193,197 in Prop AA revenuesavailable from cost savings from recently completed projects. By the January 13, 2016 deadline wereceived five applications requesting about $2.6 million in Prop AA funds. In order to fund moreprojects, we updated the Prop AA revenue assumptions for the first five years of the Strategic Plan (FiscalYears 2012/13–2016/17) based on actual revenues collected to date, which are about 3.9% higher than

11

CAC Meeting Agenda

M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2016\02 Feb 24 CAC pg.docx Page 2 of 4

was assumed in the Strategic Plan. Revising the revenue estimates, after netting out 5% program administration costs, increases the capital reserve by $999,737, which is now available for programming. We evaluated projects using the Board-adopted screening and prioritization criteria. Our recommendation is to program $2,192,934 in Prop AA funds (comprised of $1,193,197 in cost savings and $999,737 from the capital reserve) to fully fund 3 projects and partially fund 1 project (Attachment 3). This includes full funding for San Francisco Public Works’ construction requests for Broadway Chinatown ($1,029,839) and Mansell ($163,358) streetscape improvement projects, which are both One Bay Area Grant projects with funding shortfalls; and $507,980 for construction of a Muni bus layover area at the BART Daly City Station to accommodate planned service increases for the 14R-Mission Rapid route; and partial funding ($491,757) of the design phase of SFMTA’s Bulb-outs at WalkFirst Locations project which would upgrade up to 25 existing painted safety zones with concrete bulb-outs on pedestrian high injury corridors throughout the city. Our recommendation holds the capital reserve at $240,000 (about 5% of annual revenues), as approved by the Board in May 2014.

6:15 7. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $10,975,410 in Prop K Fundsand $794,980 in Prop AA Funds, with Conditions, for Six Requests, Subject tothe Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules – ACTION*

As summarized in Attachments 1 and 2, we have six requests totaling $11,770,390 in Prop K and AAfunds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee. The San Francisco Municipal TransportationAgency (SFMTA) has requested funding for three projects, including $706,397 in Prop K funds forconstruction of fall protection systems at SFMTA's Presidio Division trolleybus maintenance facility;$28,000 in District 6 Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program capital funds for a new mid-block crosswalk on Sherman Street at Bessie Carmichael elementary school; and, $287,000 in Prop AAfunds for major system overhauls of twelve elevators at Van Ness, Church, Castro and Forest Hill MuniMetro stations. San Francisco Public Works has requested a total of $10,241,000 in Prop K funds for theconstruction phases of two street resurfacing projects that will improve more than 70 city blocks,including new curb ramps. Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) has requested $507,980 in Prop AA funds toconstruct a bus layover area at BART’s Daly City station for SFMTA’s 14R-Mission Rapid line toaccommodate planned service increases for the route. Our recommendation to fund the BART projectis contingent upon Board approval of the proposed 2016 Prop AA programming recommendations,which is a separate item on this agenda.

6:25 8. Adopt a Motion of Support for Approval of the Improving West Side AccessStrategic Analysis Report – ACTION*

At the November 18, 2014 meeting of the Finance Committee, Commissioner Tang requested that weinitiate a Strategic Analysis Report (SAR) to investigate options for improving access to transit on thewest side of San Francisco. The purpose of the study is to recommend options for improving access tomajor West Side transit hubs, especially the West Portal Muni station and Daly City BART station, withthe ultimate goal of encouraging alternatives to driving alone to access transit hubs or downtown. Ascalled for in the Transportation Authority’s adopted procedures governing the development of SARs,the draft SAR is brought directly to the committee on which the requestor sits for comments andguidance. In this case, we brought the draft SAR to the February Plans and Programs Committee meetingwhich Commissioner Tang chairs and subsequently, have been seeking input from relevant city agenciesand other interested parties. We will present the SAR findings to the Citizens Advisory Committee onFebruary 24 and anticipate seeking a recommendation to approve the final SAR from the Plans andPrograms Committee in March.

6:45 9. Rail Capacity Strategy Update – INFORMATION*

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority (SFMTA) has developed a Rail Capacity Strategy that identifies and prioritizes improvements to existing infrastructure and system expansion needed to help meet future ridership demand. Strategies include alleviating bottlenecks, improving the vehicle fleet, expanding or extending the light rail and metro systems, and building system resiliency. Initial engineering was conducted for near term improvements that can be delivered in the next five years. Long term improvements identified in the strategy will inform the Metropolitan Transportation Commission-led San Francisco Bay Area Core Capacity Transit Study, and updates of the San Francisco Transportation Plan as part of the Long Range Transportation Planning Program and Plan Bay Area (the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy). SFMTA staff will provide an overview of the Rail Capacity Strategy at the February CAC meeting. The Strategy can be found on SFMTA’s February 19 Policy and Governance Committee meeting page or we can provide a hard copy upon request.

49

57

61

22

CAC Meeting Agenda

M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2016\02 Feb 24 CAC pg.docx Page 3 of 4

7:00 10. Update on 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project – INFORMATION*

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is leading the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project which proposes a major capital investment to address crowding and reliability on Muni Metro and re-build 19th Avenue as a safer street for everyone. The project builds off a Transportation Authority-led Feasibility Study that was completed in mid-2014. The Transportation Authority is still an important project partner supporting the Caltrans process and the contracting of this phase of work. SFMTA is hosting a round of community meetings this month to share project progress. At the CAC meeting, SFMTA staff will provide a brief update on the new content being shared at these meetings. This update includes describing the new “Full Subway” alternative that would construct a new subway tunnel under West Portal and 19th Avenue to Parkmerced. More information is available on the project page at www.sfmta.com/19thave.

7:15 11. Update on the Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study –INFORMATION

The Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study (RAB) is a multi-agency programstudying transportation and land use alternatives in the most rapidly growing areas of the City, includingSouth of Market, Mission Bay, and Showplace Square/Lower Potrero Hill. In anticipation of theDowntown Rail Extension, the electrification of Caltrain, and High-Speed Rail, the City is studying howbest to coordinate these projects in a unified vision for the area rather than building each projectindependently. The first phase of the RAB has prepared conceptual design alternatives for four differentproject components, in addition to a study of overall land use considerations and opportunities forplacemaking. At the September 30, 2015 Citizens Advisory Committee meeting, Chair Waddlingrequested a presentation on RAB from the San Francisco Planning Department as part of the nextround of public outreach. That outreach is now happening, with a public workshop at 6 p.m. on February23 at the Potrero Hill Recreation Center. The following day, Planning Department staff will discussfindings from the first phase of the study at the February 24 Citizens Advisory Committee.

7:45 12. Introduction of New Business – INFORMATION

During this segment of the meeting, CAC members may make comments on items not specifically listedabove, or introduce or request items for future consideration.

7:50 13. Public Comment

8:00 14. Adjournment

* Additional materials

Next Meeting: March 23, 2016

CAC MEMBERS WHO ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND SHOULD CONTACT THE CLERK AT (415) 522-4817

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Hearing Room at the Transportation Authority is wheelchair accessible. To request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact the Clerk of the Authority at (415) 522-4800. Requests made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability.

The nearest accessible BART station is Civic Center (Market/Grove/Hyde Streets). Accessible MUNI Metro lines are the F, J, K, L, M, N, T (exit at Civic Center or Van Ness Stations). MUNI bus lines also serving the area are the 6, 7, 9, 9R, 14, 14R, 21, 47, 49, and 90. For more information about MUNI accessible services, call (415) 701-4485.

There is accessible parking in the vicinity of City Hall at Civic Center Plaza and adjacent to Davies Hall and the War Memorial Complex. Accessible curbside parking is available on 11th Street.

In order to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illnesses, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at all public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products. Please help the Transportation Authority accommodate these individuals.

If any materials related to an item on this agenda have been distributed to the Citizens Advisory Committee after distribution of the meeting packet, those materials are available for public inspection at the Transportation Authority at 1455 Market Street,

73

33

CAC Meeting Agenda

M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2016\02 Feb 24 CAC pg.docx Page 4 of 4

Floor 22, San Francisco, CA 94103, during normal office hours.

Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code Sec. 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; website www.sfethics.org.

4 4

M:\CAC\Meetings\Minutes\2016\01 Jan 27 CAC Mins.docx Page 1 of 6

DRAFT MINUTES

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

1. Committee Meeting Call to Order

Chair Waddling called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m.

CAC members present were Becky Hogue, Brian Larkin, John Larson, Jacqualine Sachs, Peter Sachs and Peter Tannen.

Transportation Authority staff members present were Michelle Beaulieu, Amber Crabbe, Ryan Green-Roesel, Anna LaForte, Maria Lombardo, Mike Pickford and Steve Rehn.

2. Chair’s Report – INFORMATION

Chair Waddling introduced new CAC member Becky Hogue, who would be representing District 6 and resides on Treasure Island. Mr. Waddling also announced the resignation of Wells Whitney from the CAC and thanked him in absentia for his service.

There was no public comment.

3. Election of Chair and Vice Chair – ACTION

Chair Waddling announced that at the December 2 CAC meeting the positions of CAC Chair and Vice Chair had been open for nominations for the 2016 term. He said that for the Chair seat, he was the only member nominated and therefore eligible to be elected.

There was no public comment.

The motion to elect Chris Waddling as Chair was approved by the following vote.

Ayes: CAC Members Hogue, Larkin, Larson, J. Sachs, P. Sachs, Tannen, and Waddling

Chair Waddling said that for the Vice Chair seat, Peter Sachs was the only member nominated and therefore eligible to be elected.

There was no public comment.

The motion to elect Peter Sachs as Vice Chair was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Hogue, Larkin, Larson, J. Sachs, P. Sachs, Tannen, and Waddling

Consent Calendar

4. Approve the Minutes of the December 2, 2015 Meeting – ACTION

5. Internal Accounting and Investment Report for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 – INFORMATION

6. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Transportation Fund for Clean Air Local Expenditure Criteria – ACTION

There was no public comment on the Consent Calendar.

5

Peter Sachs moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by Brian Larkin.

The Consent Calendar was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Larkin, Larson, J. Sachs, P. Sachs, Tannen, and Waddling

Abstain: CAC Member Hogue

End of Consent Calendar

7. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $49,171,000 in Prop K Funds, with Conditions, Subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule – ACTION

Mike Pickford, Transportation Planner, presented the item per the staff memorandum.

John Larson asked why Prop K fund leveraging for the Muni buses was listed as below the expected level in Attachment 1. Anna LaForte, Deputy Director for Policy and Programming, replied that the cost of vehicles that meet the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA’s) specifications was higher than when the Prop K expenditure plan was developed and thus, more local funding was required as federal funding did not adequately cover the higher costs.

John Larson asked what happened to old MUNI buses that were taken out of service. Ariel Espiritu-Santo, Capital Project Manager at SFMTA, replied that SFMTA would sell out of service MUNI buses at auctions, but that they generally sold for very small amounts. She said that most of the buses were salvaged for materials, and that the revenue generated was not sufficient to offset the cost of acquiring new buses. Ms. LaForte added that a condition of Prop K grant agreements was that Prop K be reimbursed proportionately for any revenues resulting from the sale of capital assets purchased with sales tax funds.

Jacqualine Sachs said that new MUNI hybrid buses only had 3 seats for seniors and disabled persons, and that many did not have back windows, which she said drivers preferred to have. She asked why SFMTA purchased buses with this configuration. Ms. Espiritu-Santo said that SFMTA went through a process during the design phase to look at those components and would be happy to have a project manager follow up.

Peter Sachs said that the New Flyer buses purchased by SFMTA were similar to buses purchased by the City of Chicago. He said that from a passenger standpoint these were great buses, but said that he had heard there were issues with the hybrid drive systems breaking down early. He asked what kind of warranty was included in the contract. Ms. Espiritu-Santo said that there was a five-year warranty and that under the contract SFMTA could proactively revise the design of buses if new issues arose.

Peter Sachs asked why the design proposed for the Golden Gate Avenue buffered bike lane was not a parking buffered bike lane. Craig Raphael, Transportation Planner at SFMTA, said that he would follow up.

Peter Tannen asked whether the bike lane on Golden Gate Avenue would be in addition to existing bike lanes on Grove and McAllister Streets. Mr. Raphael said that it would be an additional route and that over the next fiscal year the SFMTA would be advancing additional routes from the Bike Strategy for implementation.

Brian Larkin asked which community based organizations (CBOs) the SFMTA would work with on Taylor Street and suggested the Southeast Asian Community Center as a candidate. Mr. Raphael said that SFMTA was working with multiple CBOs and that he would pass Mr. Larkin’s

6

suggestion along to the project manager.

During public comment, Ed Mason said that interior LED lights that turn on when the doors open on SFMTA’s new buses were blinding for passengers in the front seats. He said they should illuminate the floor rather than shine in passengers’ eyes. Peter Tannen said that he agreed with Mr. Mason. Chair Waddling said that the headlights of the buses were also too bright.

Peter Tannen moved to approve the item, seconded by John Larson.

The item was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Larkin, Larson, J. Sachs, P. Sachs, Tannen, and Waddling

Abstain: CAC Member Hogue

8. Equity Strategy for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency – INFORMATION

Julie Kirschbaum, Operations Planning and Scheduling Manager at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), presented the item.

Chair Waddling said that CAC member Myla Ablog had requested he relay her concern that increased service on the 38R had not alleviated overcrowding on the line. She also requested a presentation on overcrowding at a future meeting. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that when SFMTA reduced a 6 minute headway to a 4 minute headway on a route, it was a significant investment that resulted in a reduction in crowding. She said that as shown in the results from the Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit project modeling, improved service could attract new riders, which might be happening now, and therefore offsetting the initial crowding reduction when the 38R came on-line. Chair Waddling asked if SFMTA methodologies that compared MUNI travel times to automobile travel times took into account MUNI wait times, automobile parking times, and how MUNI travel times compared to bicycle travel times. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that the methodology incorporated randomized arrival MUNI wait times and automobile parking times. She added that the methodology did not compare MUNI travel times to bicycle travel times because this was considered a complimentary option for commuters.

Brian Larkin asked for clarification on transit signal priority for the 38R and whether it meant holding the signal or preempting the signal. Ms. Kirschbaum described the signals as a green extension with GPS technology that anticipated bus arrival. Mr. Larkin asked if transit signal priority had been implemented or if it was working correctly, because he had experienced the eastbound 38R hitting three consecutive red lights on a small stretch of Geary Boulevard. Mr. Larkin also asked why an area near Lake Street in the Richmond District had been displayed as a low-income area in the presentation. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that it may be due to a concentration of students or elderly households. Mr. Larkin asked for greater information on improvements to the overhead contact system. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that the SFMTA had done segmentation of the overhead contact system, so that if there was a problem in one area it would not propagate to other areas.

Peter Sachs requested a tour for the CAC of the SFMTA Transportation Management Center. Mr. Sachs asked if there were potential situations where transit signal priority could interfere with signal timing between buses travelling in opposite directions. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that this could happen, as the current transit signal priority system allowed any bus to receive signal priority. Ms. Kirschbaum explained that this could become problematic when expanding to hundreds of intersections, and said that SFMTA would continue to improve the system with logic rules that had preferences based on particular routes and other factors, such as typical passenger loads.

7

John Larson asked if the needs of some neighborhoods, such as Park Merced that had high densities and unique-need populations, including students, were being met through transportation efforts outside of SFMTA’s Equity Strategy. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that SFMTA had initiated both incremental and large projects to improve service to the Park Merced/San Francisco State University area, as well as Treasure Island, such as improving OWL service.

Peter Sachs asked what SFMTA’s policy was on bus bunching, and whether there was a policy to alleviate severe bus bunching. Ms. Kirschbaum responded that all MUNI drivers were trained to maintain a one block spacing between their bus and the bus in front of them, that the position of routes were monitored through the Transportation Management Center, and that interventions and adjustments were made when appropriate. Ms. Kirschbaum added that SFMTA tried to make route adjustments at terminals whenever possible to minimize disruption to passengers, and that the SFMTA Radio System Replacement Project would improve service and service adjustments, as operators would be able to communicate directly with the Transportation Management Center and see how they were performing against schedules.

Becky Hogue recommended that there should be additional service improvements to Treasure Island beyond only OWL service improvements. She noted that residents would ask what the SFMTA was doing about service during the day as well, where there was only one very crowded bus or back to back buses (bus bunching).

Maria Lombardo, Chief Deputy Director, said that staff would present an update on the Radio System Replacement Project at the next CAC meeting.

There was no public comment.

9. Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program Update – INFORMATION

Anna LaForte, Deputy Director for Policy and Programming, presented the item staff memorandum.

Peter Tannen asked if there were any aspects of the Cesar Chavez/Bayshore/Potrero Intersection Improvement Project that addressed pedestrian path safety issues associated with the current homeless encampment. Ms. LaForte stated that she would follow up on this, but noted that there were some simple lighting improvements that could increase the perception of safety, although it was not considered a comprehensive lighting plan.

During public comment, Edward Mason asked how Golden Gate Transit would respond to the 19 new curb bulb-outs proposed as part of the Lombard Street/US-101 Corridor Pedestrian Safety Project, as this would reduce the traffic lanes from three to two. Mr. Mason also asked if the proposed curb bulb-outs would result in congestion and pedestrian safety issues, citing the intersection of 24th and Church Streets as an example where other buses and drivers went around commuter shuttles because they tend take a long time to load or disembark passengers. Craig Raphael, Transportation Planner at SFMTA, responded that SFMTA had studied the issue of traffic congestion associated with curb bulb-outs, and that because Lombard Street was also a state highway, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) would need to approve any proposed treatments. Mr. Raphael added that Caltrans was quick to point out issues in terms of traffic impacts.

10. Bay Area Rapid Transit Travel Incentives Program – INFORMATION RGR

Ryan Greene-Roesel, Senior Transportation Planner, presented the item per the staff memorandum.

8

Chair Waddling asked if there were peak usage pattern charts for BART similar to the chart for Singapore shown during the presentation. Ms. Greene-Roesel responded that there were charts showing BART tracks ridership by time of day and that this information would be used to inform the design of the program.

There was no public comment.

11. Road Charge Pilot Program Update – INFORMATION

Michelle Beaulieu, Transportation Planner, presented the item per the staff memorandum.

John Larson commented that he liked the revenue model and its potential, as it was more equitable than the prior gasoline tax, and that it allowed for greater choice of payment methods. He noted that he signed up to participate in the pilot.

Peter Tannen asked how drivers who reported mileage would avoid paying the gas tax when purchasing gas. Ms. Beaulieu responded that the same program in Oregon was rebate-based, meaning a driver that enrolled in the system would be reimbursed for purchased gas.

Brian Larkin asked if there were an estimate on the cost of implementing an automatic system that reported mileage, and asked how this related to the next agenda item which included proposed gas tax increases. Ms. Beaulieu responded that she would have to follow up on the cost of implementing such a system. Ms. Beaulieu added that the gas tax was difficult to increase politically, and that if the process for increasing it was not fundamentally changed (e.g. index to inflation), the current gas tax would not be a viable long-term revenue source. Mr. Larkin stated that electric vehicle recharge stations should be subjected to a tax, as gasoline was often used to generate electricity.

Becky Hogue asked how data privacy would be addressed in the program. Ms. Beaulieu responded that the program allowed customers to request that their data not be collected.

There was no public comment.

12. State and Federal Legislative Update – INFORMATION

Amber Crabbe, Assistant Deputy Director for Policy and Programming, presented the item staff memorandum.

Peter Sachs stated that he believed the proposed vehicle registration fee increases were too aggressive and would amount to a regressive tax, which underscored the importance of a different road usage charge.

There was no public comment.

13. Introduction of New Business – INFORMATION

Jacqualine Sachs commented that she had recently attended a Late Night Transportation Working Group meeting that Supervisor Wiener also attended and listened to suggestions.

Peter Sachs stated that he was interested in learning more about the feasibility of new pedestrian block phases and the implementation of “zebra stripping” on high speed roads approaching crosswalks, similar to those implemented by the Virginia Department of Transportation.

There was no public comment.

14. Public Comment

Edward Mason described how he had observed two commuter shuttles in Noe Valley committing traffic violations, and said that one of the buses did not have California license

9

plates or a proper decal. He said that Parking Control Officers cited this shuttle and found that it was registered in Florida. Mr. Mason expressed frustration at the lack of enforcement of commuter shuttles, citing issues of commuter shuttles double parking at MUNI stops and travelling along weight restricted streets in Noe Valley.

Santiago Lerma stated that he had observed commuter shuttles double-parked in the travel lane in Glen Park, and agreed that more enforcement was needed.

John Larson stated that one shuttle service company no longer stopped at Glen Park because of size issues, which could have been a result of neighborhood complaints.

15. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.

10

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

1 o

f 27

Bil

ls o

f In

tere

st

To

vie

w d

ocu

men

ts a

sso

ciate

d w

ith

th

e b

ill,

cli

ck t

he b

ill

nu

mb

er

lin

k.

To

vie

w t

he b

ill

tex

t, c

lick

th

e P

DF

or

HT

ML

lin

k.

Th

e F

inan

ce C

om

mit

tee

is r

eco

mm

endin

g n

ew

su

pp

ort

po

siti

on

s o

n A

ssem

bly

Bill

(A

B)

1574 (

Ch

iu),

AB

1591 (

Fra

zier

), S

enat

e B

ill (

SB

) 812 (

Hill

) an

d S

B 8

24 (

Bea

ll); an

d

new

op

po

se p

osi

tio

ns

on

AB

1550 (

Go

mez

), A

B 1

641 (

Alle

n, T

ravis

), A

ssem

bly

Bill

Fir

st E

xtra

ord

inar

y Ses

sio

n (

AB

X1)

18 (

Lin

der

) an

d A

BX

1 2

5 (

Alle

n, T

ravis

).

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

6

Intr

od

uce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f

htm

l

Wilk

R

(Dis

t 38)

Bo

nds:

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n: sc

hoo

l fa

cilit

ies.

W

ould

pro

vid

e th

at n

o f

urt

her

bo

nds

shal

l b

e so

ld f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail p

urp

ose

s p

urs

uan

t to

th

e Saf

e, R

elia

ble

H

igh

-Sp

eed

Pas

sen

ger

Tra

in B

on

d A

ct f

or

the

21s

t C

entu

ry,

exp

ect

as s

pec

ific

ally

pro

vid

ed w

ith

res

pec

t to

an

exi

stin

g ap

pro

pri

atio

n f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail p

urp

ose

s fo

r ea

rly

imp

rovem

ent

pro

ject

s in

th

e P

has

e 1 b

len

ded

sys

tem

. The

bill

, su

bje

ct t

o t

he

abo

ve

exce

pti

on

, w

ould

req

uir

e re

dir

ecti

on

of

the

un

spen

t p

roce

eds

rece

ived

fro

m o

uts

tan

din

g b

on

ds

issu

ed

and

so

ld f

or

oth

er h

igh

-sp

eed r

ail p

urp

ose

s p

rio

r to

th

e ef

fect

ive

dat

e o

f th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s, u

po

n a

ppro

pri

atio

n, fo

r use

in

ret

irin

g th

e d

ebt

incu

rred

fro

m t

he

issu

ance

an

d s

ale

of

tho

se o

uts

tan

din

g b

on

ds.

Thes

e p

rovis

ions

wo

uld

bec

om

e ef

fect

ive

on

ly u

po

n a

pp

roval

by

the

vo

ters

at

the

nex

t st

atew

ide

elec

tio

n.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Op

pose

Pro

hib

its

sale

of

bo

nds

to s

up

po

rt

Hig

h-S

pee

d R

ail p

rogr

am. D

irec

ts

un

spen

t b

on

d f

un

ds

to r

etir

e d

ebt

fro

m P

rop

1A

an

d w

ould

auth

ori

ze

use

of

bo

nd

pro

ceed

s fo

r K

-12

build

ing

purp

ose

s.

AB

23

Intr

od

uce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f

htm

l

Pat

ters

on

R

(Dis

t 23)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006:

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

on

s A

ct o

f 2006

auth

ori

zes

the

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d t

o in

clude

the

use

of

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s. C

urr

ent

stat

e boar

d

regu

lati

on

s re

quir

e sp

ecif

ied e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Jan

uar

y 1,

2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al s

pec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Januar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

stea

d e

xem

pt

tho

se c

ateg

ori

es o

f p

erso

ns

or

enti

ties

th

at d

id n

ot

hav

e a

com

plia

nce

ob

ligat

ion

, as

def

ined

, und

er a

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, f

rom

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

th

rough

Dec

emb

er 3

1,

2020.

Ass

emb

ly

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

po

stp

on

e th

e ef

fect

ive

dat

e o

f th

e im

posi

tio

n o

f C

ap a

nd

Tra

de

emis

sion

reg

ula

tio

ns

on

fuel

fro

m 2

015

to

2020 s

ched

ule

d

for

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion f

uel

s sy

stem

. T

he

auth

or

is c

on

cern

ed t

hat

th

e p

ub

lic w

ill b

e su

bje

ct t

o a

spik

e in

fu

el p

rice

s.

Ho

wev

er, th

e ef

fect

of

the

def

erra

l w

ill b

e to

red

uce

Cap

an

d T

rad

e au

ctio

n r

even

ues

.

11

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

2 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

318

Am

ended

:

6/

11/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ch

au D

(D

ist

49)

Lo

st m

on

ey a

nd

go

ods:

bic

ycle

s: r

esto

rati

on

to

ow

ner

. W

ould

, un

til D

ecem

ber

31, 2

020, p

rovid

e th

at if

that

lost

p

rop

erty

is

foun

d o

n a

veh

icle

of

pub

lic c

on

vey

ance

or

on

p

ub

lic t

ran

sit

pro

per

ty, th

at it

inst

ead b

e tu

rned

in

to

th

e p

ub

lic t

ran

sit

agen

cy, an

d w

ould

pro

vid

e 90 d

ays

for

the

ow

ner

to

ret

urn

an

d c

laim

th

e p

roper

ty, as

sp

ecif

ied. T

he

bill

, un

til

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2020, al

so w

ould

req

uir

e th

e p

ub

lic t

ran

sit

agen

cy t

o c

ause

no

tice

of

the

pro

per

ty t

o b

e p

ub

lish

ed u

nder

sp

ecif

ied

cir

cum

stan

ces.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

Wat

ch

T

his

bill

est

ablis

hes

a p

ilot

pro

gram

, un

til,

2021, un

der

wh

ich

a p

ub

lic

tran

sit

agen

cy m

ay d

on

ate

to c

har

ity

a p

ort

ion

of

lost

or

un

clai

med

b

icyc

les

afte

r 45 d

ays.

L

A M

etro

is

spo

nso

rin

g th

is b

ill

bec

ause

ho

ldin

g b

icyc

les

for

90 d

ays

is im

par

tial

an

d c

ost

ly.

AB

516

Am

ended

:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Mulli

n D

(D

ist

22)

Veh

icle

s: t

emp

ora

ry lic

ense

pla

tes.

W

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f M

oto

r V

ehic

les

(DM

V)

to

dev

elo

p a

n o

per

atio

nal

sys

tem

, n

o lat

er t

han

Jan

uar

y 1, 20

18,

that

allo

ws

a d

eale

r or

less

or-

reta

iler

to e

lect

ron

ical

ly r

epo

rt t

he

sale

of

a veh

icle

an

d p

rovid

e a

tem

po

rary

lic

ense

pla

te, as

sp

ecif

ied

. T

he

bill

wo

uld

, co

mm

enci

ng

Jan

uar

y 1, 2017

, au

tho

rize

th

e d

epar

tmen

t to

ass

ess

spec

ifie

d a

dm

inis

trat

ive

fees

on

pro

cess

ing

agen

cies

to

sup

po

rt t

he

adm

inis

trat

ion

of

this

sys

tem

. T

his

bill

con

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

Sup

po

rt

T

his

bill

req

uir

es d

evel

opm

ent

of

a st

atew

ide

tem

po

rary

lic

ense

pla

te

(TL

P)

syst

em t

o e

nsu

re n

ew a

nd

use

d p

urc

has

ed v

ehic

les

are

iden

tifi

able

to

law

enfo

rcem

ent

and

to

ll o

per

ato

rs d

uri

ng

the

per

iod

b

etw

een

th

e p

oin

t o

f sa

le a

nd

wh

en

per

man

ent

licen

se p

late

s ar

e re

ceiv

ed

by

the

purc

has

er.

AB

620

Am

ended

:

1/

27/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Her

nán

dez

, R

oge

r D

(D

ist

48)

Hig

h-o

ccup

ancy

to

ll (

HO

T)

lan

es: ex

emp

tio

ns

fro

m t

olls

. W

ould

req

uir

e L

os

An

gele

s C

oun

ty M

etro

po

litan

T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty (

LA

CM

TA

) to

tak

e ad

dit

ion

al s

tep

s,

bey

on

d t

he

pre

vio

us

imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f a

low

-in

com

e as

sist

ance

pro

gram

, to

in

crea

se e

nro

llmen

t an

d p

arti

cip

atio

n in

th

e lo

w-i

nco

me

assi

stan

ce p

rogr

am, as

sp

ecif

ied, th

rough

ad

ver

tisi

ng

and w

ork

wit

h c

om

mun

ity

org

aniz

atio

ns

and s

oci

al

serv

ice

agen

cies

. T

he

bill

would

als

o r

equir

e L

AC

MT

A a

nd t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n t

o r

epo

rt t

o t

he

Leg

isla

ture

by

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2018, o

n e

ffort

s to

im

pro

ve

the

HO

T lan

e p

rogr

am, in

clud

ing

effo

rts

to in

crea

se p

arti

cip

atio

n in

th

e lo

w-i

nco

me

assi

stan

ce p

rogr

am. T

his

bill co

nta

ins

oth

er

exis

tin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

Rule

s

Wat

ch

E

xpan

ds

LA

Met

ro a

uth

ori

ty r

elat

ive

to H

OT

Lan

es in

th

eir

juri

sdic

tio

n,

requir

ing

the

agen

cy t

o p

rovi

de

assi

stan

ce t

o t

ran

sit

use

rs a

nd

co

mm

ute

rs o

f la

w a

nd

mo

der

ate

inco

me.

A

men

ded

to

allo

w L

AC

MT

A

flex

ibili

ty in

pro

vid

ing

low

in

com

e as

sist

ance

.

12

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

3 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

779

Am

ended

:

8/

19/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Gar

cia,

C

rist

ina

D

(Dis

t 58)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n: co

nge

stio

n m

anag

emen

t p

rogr

am.

Wo

uld

rev

ise

the

def

init

ion

of

"in

fill

op

po

rtun

ity

zon

e" t

o n

ot

requir

e th

at it

be

wit

hin

a s

pec

ifie

d d

ista

nce

of

a m

ajo

r tr

ansi

t st

op

or

hig

h-q

ual

ity

tran

sit

corr

idor.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

rev

ise

the

requir

emen

ts f

or

a co

nge

stio

n m

anag

emen

t pro

gram

by

rem

ovin

g tr

affi

c le

vel

of

serv

ice

(LO

S)

stan

dar

ds

esta

blis

hed

fo

r a

syst

em o

f h

igh

way

s an

d r

oad

way

s as

a r

equir

ed e

lem

ent

and

in

stea

d r

equir

ing

mea

sure

s o

f ef

fect

iven

ess

for

a sy

stem

of

hig

hw

ays

and

ro

adw

ays.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s

Sup

po

rt a

nd

W

ork

wit

h

Auth

or

Lat

est

amen

dm

ent

elim

inat

es L

OS a

s an

ele

men

t o

f a

con

gest

ion

m

anag

emen

t p

lan

.

AB

828

Am

ended

:

7/

14/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lo

w D

(D

ist

28)

Veh

icle

s: t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

ser

vice

s.

Wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e P

ub

lic U

tilit

ies

Co

mm

issi

on

to

co

nduct

an

in

ves

tiga

tio

n t

o c

onsi

der

whet

her

exi

stin

g st

atute

s an

d

regu

lati

on

s re

lati

ng

to t

ransp

ort

atio

n s

ervic

es s

erve

the

pub

lic

inte

rest

, en

coura

ge in

no

vat

ion

, an

d c

reat

e a

fair

an

d

com

pet

itiv

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n m

arket

bet

wee

n c

om

pan

ies

that

p

rovid

e re

gula

ted

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n s

ervic

es. T

he

bill

wo

uld

re

quir

e th

e co

mm

issi

on t

o c

om

ple

te t

he

inves

tiga

tio

n a

nd

rep

ort

its

co

ncl

usi

on

s an

d r

eco

mm

endat

ion

s to

th

e L

egis

latu

re

on

or

bef

ore

Jan

uar

y 1, 2017.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

Wat

ch

Am

end

ed t

o e

xclu

de

TN

C v

ehic

les

fro

m "

com

mer

cial

veh

icle

" d

efin

itio

n

un

der

cer

tain

co

nd

itio

ns.

AB

869

Am

ended

:

6/

18/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Co

op

er D

(D

ist

9)

Pub

lic t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

age

nci

es: fa

re e

vas

ion

an

d p

roh

ibit

ed

con

duct

. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a p

ub

lic t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

to

ado

pt

and

en

forc

e an

ord

inan

ce t

o im

po

se a

nd e

nfo

rce

civil

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es f

or

fare

evas

ion

or

oth

er p

asse

nge

r m

isco

nd

uct

, o

ther

th

an b

y m

ino

rs, o

n o

r in

a t

ran

sit

faci

lity

or

veh

icle

in

lie

u o

f th

e cr

imin

al p

enal

ties

oth

erw

ise

app

licab

le,

wit

h s

pec

ifie

d a

dm

inis

trat

ive

pro

cedure

s fo

r th

e im

po

siti

on

an

d e

nfo

rcem

ent

of

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es, in

cludin

g an

in

itia

l re

vie

w a

nd

op

po

rtun

ity

for

a su

bse

quen

t ad

min

istr

ativ

e h

eari

ng.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e th

at a

per

son

wh

o f

ails

to

pay

th

e ad

min

istr

ativ

e p

enal

ty w

hen

due

or

succ

essf

ully

co

mp

lete

th

e ad

min

istr

ativ

e p

roce

ss t

o d

ism

iss

the

no

tice

of

fare

evas

ion

o

r p

asse

nge

r co

nd

uct

vio

lati

on

may

be

sub

ject

to

th

ose

cr

imin

al p

enal

ties

.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

W

atch

Pro

vid

es a

dd

itio

nal

fle

xib

ility

to

tr

ansi

t ag

enci

es t

hat

see

k t

o u

se t

he

adm

inis

trat

ive

adju

dic

atio

n p

roce

ss

(tra

nsi

t co

urt

).

13

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

4 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

945

Am

ended

:

5/

20/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Tin

g D

(D

ist

19)

Sal

es a

nd

use

tax

es: e

xem

pti

on

: lo

w-e

mis

sion

veh

icle

s.

Wo

uld

, o

n a

nd

aft

er J

anuar

y 1, 2016, un

til Ja

nuar

y 1, 2021

, p

rovid

e a

par

tial

exe

mp

tio

n f

rom

sal

es a

nd u

se t

axes

wit

h

resp

ect

to t

he

sale

of

spec

ifie

d lo

w-e

mis

sio

n v

ehic

les,

as

pro

vid

ed. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ions

and o

ther

ex

isti

ng

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Susp

ense

File

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill is

inte

nd

ed t

o e

nco

ura

ge

out-

of-

stat

e el

ectr

ic v

ehic

le b

uye

rs t

o

com

e to

th

e fa

cto

ry a

nd

vis

it t

he

stat

e as

par

t o

f th

eir

exp

erie

nce

. R

ecen

t am

end

men

ts a

pp

ly t

he

exem

pti

on

on

ly o

n s

tate

, n

ot

loca

l, sa

les

taxe

s. T

he

Bay

Are

a A

ir Q

ual

ity

Man

agem

ent

Dis

tric

t h

as a

do

pte

d a

su

pp

ort

po

siti

on

.

AB

1030

Am

ended

:

7/

7/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Rid

ley-

Th

om

as D

(D

ist

54)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006:

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es m

on

eys

in t

he

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

R

educt

ion

Fun

d t

o b

e use

d t

o f

acili

tate

th

e re

duct

ion

of

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

and, w

her

e ap

plic

able

an

d t

o t

he

exte

nt

feas

ible

, to

fo

ster

jo

b c

reat

ion

by

pro

mo

tin

g in

-sta

te

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

reduct

ion

pro

ject

s ca

rrie

d o

ut

by

Cal

ifo

rnia

wo

rker

s an

d b

usi

nes

ses.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e p

rio

rity

be

given

to

pro

ject

s in

vo

lvin

g h

irin

g th

at s

up

po

rt t

he

targ

eted

tra

inin

g an

d h

irin

g o

f w

ork

ers

from

dis

advan

tage

d

com

mun

itie

s fo

r ca

reer

-tra

ck jo

bs.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

Wat

ch

Req

uir

es p

rio

rity

fo

r ca

p a

nd t

rad

e -

fun

ded

pro

ject

s b

y st

ate

gran

t ag

enci

es f

or

pro

ject

s w

ith

p

artn

ersh

ips

wit

h t

rain

ing

enti

ties

w

ith

pro

ven

rec

ord

of

pla

cing

dis

advan

tage

d w

ork

ers.

AB

1176

Am

ended

:

8/

18/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Per

ea D

(D

ist

0)

Veh

icula

r ai

r p

ollu

tion

. W

ould

est

ablis

h t

he

Advan

ced L

ow

-Car

bo

n D

iese

l F

uel

s A

cces

s P

rogr

am, to

be

adm

inis

tere

d b

y th

e Sta

te E

ner

gy

Res

ourc

es C

on

serv

atio

n a

nd D

evel

op

men

t C

om

mis

sio

n, i

n

con

sult

atio

n w

ith

th

e Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d, fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

of

red

uci

ng

the

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

of

die

sel

mo

tor

veh

icle

s b

y p

rovid

ing

cap

ital

ass

ista

nce

fo

r p

roje

cts

that

ex

pan

d a

dvan

ced

lo

w-c

arb

on

die

sel fu

elin

g in

fras

truct

ure

in

co

mm

un

itie

s th

at a

re d

ispro

po

rtio

nat

ely

imp

acte

d b

y en

vir

on

men

tal h

azar

ds

and a

ddit

ion

ally

wh

ere

the

grea

test

air

qual

ity

imp

acts

can

be

iden

tifi

ed. T

his

bill

con

tain

s o

ther

re

late

d p

rovis

ion

s.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s

Wat

ch

C

reat

es t

he

Ad

van

ced

Lo

w-C

arb

on

D

iese

l F

uel

s A

cces

s P

rogr

am,

adm

inis

tere

d b

y th

e E

ner

gy

Co

mm

issi

on

to

fun

d a

dvan

ced

lo

w-c

arb

on

die

sel fu

elin

g in

fras

truct

ure

pro

ject

s in

d

isad

van

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s.

14

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

5 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1335

Am

ended

:

6/

3/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Atk

ins

D

(Dis

t 78)

Build

ing

Ho

mes

and

Job

s A

ct.

Wo

uld

en

act

the

Build

ing

Ho

mes

an

d J

ob

s A

ct. T

he

bill

wo

uld

m

ake

legi

slat

ive

fin

din

gs a

nd d

ecla

rati

on

s re

lati

ng

to t

he

nee

d

for

esta

blis

hin

g p

erm

anen

t, o

ngo

ing

sourc

es o

f fu

ndin

g d

edic

ated

to

aff

ord

able

ho

usi

ng

dev

elo

pm

ent.

Th

is b

ill

con

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly T

hir

d

Rea

din

g Sup

po

rt

T

his

bill

, w

hic

h is

sim

ilar

to S

B 3

91

(DeS

auln

ier)

wh

ich

we

sup

po

rted

las

t ye

ar w

ould

im

pose

a f

ee o

f $7

5 o

n

real

pro

per

ty t

ransa

ctio

ns.

Th

e b

ill is

sup

po

rted

by

the

Cit

y an

d C

oun

ty o

f San

Fra

nci

sco

, as

a m

ean

s to

fulf

ill

affo

rdab

le h

ousi

ng

nee

ds

in e

xist

ing,

d

evel

op

ed c

om

mun

itie

s.

AB

1360

Am

ended

:

7/

2/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Tin

g D

(D

ist

19)

Ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

s of

pas

sen

gers

: in

div

idual

far

e ex

emp

tio

n.

Wo

uld

exe

mp

t fr

om

sp

ecif

ied p

rovis

ions

rela

tin

g to

th

e P

asse

nge

r C

har

ter-

Par

ty C

arri

ers'

Act

a s

ervic

e o

per

ated

by

a tr

ansp

ort

atio

n n

etw

ork

co

mp

any

or

a ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

of

pas

sen

gers

th

at p

rear

ran

ges

a ri

de

amo

ng

mult

iple

pas

sen

gers

w

ho

sh

are

the

rid

e in

wh

ole

or

in p

art,

pro

vid

ed t

hat

th

e veh

icle

sea

ts n

o m

ore

th

an 7

pas

sen

gers

, n

ot

incl

udin

g th

e d

river

, is

op

erat

ed b

y a

par

tici

pat

ing

dri

ver

, as

def

ined

, is

no

t use

d t

o p

rovid

e p

ub

lic t

ransi

t se

rvic

es o

r ca

rry

pas

sen

gers

over

a

fixe

d r

oute

, is

no

t use

d t

o p

rovid

e p

up

il tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

serv

ices

or

pub

lic p

arat

ransi

t se

rvic

es, an

d t

he

fare

fo

r ea

ch

pas

sen

ger

is les

s th

an t

he

fare

th

at w

ould

be

char

ged t

o a

p

asse

nge

r tr

avel

ing

alo

ne.

Sen

ate

2 y

ear

Wat

ch

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n N

etw

ork

Com

pan

ies

(TN

Cs)

hav

e re

cen

tly

star

ted s

ervic

es

to a

llow

rid

ers

to b

e p

icked

up

at

sim

ilar

loca

tio

ns

and s

har

e a

dri

ver

an

d c

arp

oo

l at

red

uce

d f

ares

. T

his

b

ill w

ould

per

mit

a T

NC

to

op

erat

e a

rid

esh

are

pro

gram

an

d c

har

ge

ind

ivid

ual

far

es, p

rovid

ed t

hat

th

e in

div

idual

far

e is

les

s th

an f

or

the

sam

e ri

de

it w

ould

be

for

a si

ngl

e p

asse

nge

r ri

din

g al

on

e.

AB

1364

Intr

od

uce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lin

der

R

(Dis

t 60)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n (

CT

C).

C

urr

ent

law

ves

ts t

he

CT

C w

ith

sp

ecif

ied p

ow

ers,

duti

es, an

d

fun

ctio

ns

rela

tive

to t

ransp

ort

atio

n m

atte

rs. C

urr

ent

law

re

quir

es t

he

com

mis

sio

n t

o r

etai

n in

dep

enden

t au

tho

rity

to

p

erfo

rm t

he

duti

es a

nd f

un

ctio

ns

pre

scri

bed

to

it

un

der

an

y p

rovis

ion

of

law

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

exc

lude

the

CT

C f

rom

th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

an

d e

stab

lish

it

as a

n e

nti

ty in

th

e st

ate

gover

nm

ent.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

chan

ges.

Sen

ate

Rule

s W

atch

R

emo

ves

CT

C f

rom

juri

sdic

tio

n

un

der

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy a

nd

re

-est

ablis

hes

its

auto

nom

y.

15

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

6 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1550

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

4/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Go

mez

D

(Dis

t 51)

Gre

enh

ouse

gas

es: in

ves

tmen

t p

lan

: dis

advan

tage

d

com

mun

itie

s.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Fin

ance

, in

co

nsu

ltat

ion

wit

h t

he

stat

e bo

ard a

nd a

ny

oth

er r

elev

ant

stat

e ag

ency

, to

dev

elo

p, as

sp

ecif

ied, a

3-y

ear

inves

tmen

t p

lan

fo

r th

e m

on

eys

dep

osi

ted in

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d

(GG

RF

). T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e in

ves

tmen

t p

lan

to

al

loca

te a

min

imum

of

25%

of

the

avai

lab

le m

on

eys

in t

he

fun

d t

o p

roje

cts

loca

ted w

ithin

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s an

d a

sep

arat

e an

d a

ddit

ion

al 2

5%

to

pro

ject

s th

at b

enef

it

low

-in

com

e h

ouse

ho

lds.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Incr

ease

s re

quir

emen

t fr

om

10%

to

25%

of

GG

RF

to

ben

efit

d

isad

van

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s (D

AC

);

also

ad

ds

new

req

uir

emen

t th

at 2

5%

al

so m

ust

ben

efit

lo

w-i

nco

me

ho

use

ho

lds.

W

e h

ave

pre

vio

usl

y o

pp

ose

d s

imila

r le

gisl

atio

n b

ecau

se t

he

stat

e’s

def

init

ion

of

DA

C d

oes

no

t ad

equat

ely

refl

ect

the

dis

adva

nta

ged

co

mm

un

itie

s o

f San

Fra

nci

sco

. W

e ar

e w

ork

ing

wit

h t

he

stat

e to

am

end

th

e D

AC

def

init

ion

.

AB

1555

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

4/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Go

mez

D

(Dis

t 51)

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d (

GG

RF

).

Wo

uld

sta

te t

he

inte

nt

of

the

Leg

isla

ture

to

en

act

futu

re

legi

slat

ion

th

at w

ould

ap

pro

pri

ate

$1,7

00,0

00,0

00 f

rom

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d f

or

the

2015-1

6 f

isca

l ye

ar

that

wo

uld

be

allo

cate

d t

o d

iffe

ren

t en

titi

es in

am

oun

ts t

o b

e d

eter

min

ed in

th

e fu

ture

leg

isla

tio

n f

or

purp

ose

s in

cludin

g lo

w

carb

on

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

nd infr

astr

uct

ure

, cl

ean

en

ergy

co

mm

un

itie

s, a

nd

co

mm

un

ity

clim

ate

imp

rovem

ents

, w

etla

nd

and

wat

ersh

ed r

esto

rati

on

, an

d c

arb

on

seq

ues

trat

ion

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill is

inte

nd

ed t

o b

e a

veh

icle

fo

r n

egoti

atin

g G

GR

F f

un

ds

exp

end

iture

s le

ft o

ver

fro

m 2

015.

AB

1569

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

4/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Ste

ino

rth

R

(Dis

t 40)

Cal

ifo

rnia

En

vir

on

men

tal Q

ual

ity

Act

(C

EQ

A):

exe

mp

tio

n:

exis

tin

g tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

. W

ould

exe

mp

t fr

om

th

e p

rovis

ion

s o

f C

EQ

A a

pro

ject

, or

the

issu

ance

of

a p

erm

it f

or

a p

roje

ct, th

at c

on

sist

s of

the

insp

ecti

on

, m

ain

ten

ance

, re

pai

r, r

ehab

ilita

tio

n, re

pla

cem

ent,

or

rem

oval

of,

or

the

addit

ion

of

an a

uxi

liary

lan

e o

r b

ikew

ay t

o,

exis

tin

g tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

an

d t

hat

mee

ts c

erta

in

requir

emen

ts. T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e p

ub

lic a

gen

cy

carr

yin

g o

ut

the

pro

ject

to

tak

e ce

rtai

n a

ctio

ns.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Wo

uld

exe

mp

t m

ino

r ro

ad r

epai

r p

roje

cts

from

CE

QA

if

carr

ied

out

wit

hin

exi

stin

g ri

ght-

of-

way

.

16

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

7 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1574

Intr

od

uce

d:

2/

1/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Ch

iu D

(D

ist

17)

Veh

icle

s o

f ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

s o

f p

asse

nge

rs a

nd p

asse

nge

r st

age

corp

ora

tio

ns.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f M

oto

r V

ehic

les

to

no

tify

th

e P

ub

lic U

tilit

ies

Com

mis

sio

n (

PU

C)

wh

en a

ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

of

pas

sen

gers

or

a p

asse

nge

r st

age

corp

ora

tio

n f

irst

reg

iste

rs a

bus,

lim

ousi

ne,

or

mo

dif

ied

limo

usi

ne

wit

h t

he

dep

artm

ent,

an

d t

o p

rovid

e in

form

atio

n t

o

the

PU

C t

hat

will

allo

w t

he

PU

C t

o iden

tify

th

e veh

icle

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e P

UC

, wit

h r

esp

ect

to t

ho

se n

ewly

re

gist

ered

buse

s, lim

ousi

nes

, or

mo

dif

ied lim

ousi

nes

, to

en

sure

th

at t

he

veh

icle

s m

eet

all st

atuto

ry a

nd r

egula

tory

req

uir

emen

ts

for

safe

op

erat

ion

. Th

e b

ill, u

po

n t

he

PU

C b

eco

min

g aw

are

of

a b

us,

lim

ousi

ne,

or

mo

dif

ied lim

ousi

ne

of

a ch

arte

r-p

arty

ca

rrie

r o

f p

asse

nge

rs o

r a

pas

sen

ger

stag

e co

rpo

rati

on

th

at h

as

no

t b

een

rep

ort

ed t

o t

he

com

mis

sio

n b

y th

e ca

rrie

r o

r co

rpo

rati

on

, w

ould

req

uir

e th

e P

UC

to

im

med

iate

ly t

ake

step

s to

req

uir

e th

e ca

rrie

r o

r co

rpo

rati

on

to

up

dat

e it

s re

po

rtin

g o

f veh

icle

s to

th

e P

UC

an

d t

o r

eques

t th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f th

e C

alif

orn

ia H

igh

way

Pat

rol (C

HP

) to

con

duct

a s

afet

y in

spec

tio

n o

f th

e veh

icle

. T

he

bill

wo

uld

pro

hib

it u

se o

f su

ch a

b

us,

lim

ousi

ne,

or

mo

dif

ied lim

ousi

ne

to t

ran

spo

rt p

asse

nge

rs

in t

he

abse

nce

of

secu

rin

g a

sati

sfac

tory

rat

ing

fro

m t

he

CH

P812, an

d w

ould

auth

ori

ze a

law

en

forc

emen

t ag

ency

to

im

po

un

d a

bus,

lim

ousi

ne,

or

mo

dif

ied lim

ousi

ne

op

erat

ed in

vio

lati

on

of

this

pro

vis

ion

.

Ref

erre

d t

o

Uti

litie

s &

C

om

mer

ce a

nd

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

Th

e b

ill s

eeks

to e

nsu

re t

hat

buse

s ar

e in

spec

ted

und

er s

afet

y cr

iter

ia b

y re

quir

ing

DM

V t

o n

oti

fy t

he

PU

C

wh

en a

bus

com

pan

y fi

rst

regi

ster

s th

e veh

icle

. In

th

e ev

ent

ther

e is

no

t a

sati

sfac

tory

rat

ing,

th

e b

ill p

roh

ibit

s th

e use

of

the

bus.

AB

1591

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

6/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Fra

zier

D

(Dis

t 11)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Wo

uld

cre

ate

the

Ro

ad M

ainte

nan

ce a

nd R

ehab

ilita

tio

n

Pro

gram

to

ad

dre

ss d

efer

red m

ain

ten

ance

on

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay

syst

em a

nd

th

e lo

cal st

reet

an

d r

oad

sys

tem

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

re

quir

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

to

ado

pt

per

form

ance

cri

teri

a to

en

sure

eff

icie

nt

use

of

the

fun

ds

avai

lab

le f

or

the

pro

gram

. Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

p

rovis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

New

maj

or

reven

ue

bill

($7

.3 b

illio

n

in n

ew t

axes

an

d lo

an r

epay

men

ts

over

10 y

ears

) fo

r ro

ad r

epai

r an

d

trad

e co

rrid

ors

. A

lso

co

mm

its

new

ca

p a

nd

tra

de

reven

ues

to

the

Tra

nsi

t In

terc

ity

Rai

l C

apac

ity

Pro

gram

w

hic

h t

he

SF

MT

A a

nd

BA

RT

are

ta

rget

ing

for

sign

ific

ant

core

cap

acit

y in

ves

tmen

ts s

uch

as

veh

icle

s an

d

trai

n c

on

tro

l.

17

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

8 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1641

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

11/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Alle

n,

Tra

vis

R

(Dis

t 72)

Sh

utt

le s

ervic

es: lo

adin

g an

d u

nlo

adin

g o

f p

asse

nge

rs.

Un

der

curr

ent

law

, a

per

son

may

no

t st

op

, p

ark, o

r le

ave

a veh

icle

sta

nd

ing

alo

ngs

ide

a cu

rb s

pac

e au

tho

rize

d f

or

the

load

ing

or

un

load

ing

of

pas

sen

gers

of

a b

us

enga

ged a

s a

com

mo

n c

arri

er in

lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n w

hen

in

dic

ated

by

a si

gn o

r re

d p

ain

t o

n t

he

curb

, ex

cep

t th

at e

xist

ing

law

allo

ws

loca

l au

tho

riti

es t

o p

erm

it s

cho

ol b

use

s to

sto

p a

lon

gsid

e th

ese

curb

sp

aces

up

on

agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n a

tra

nsi

t sy

stem

o

per

atin

g b

use

s as

co

mm

on

car

rier

s in

lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n a

nd

a p

ub

lic s

cho

ol d

istr

ict

or

pri

vat

e sc

ho

ol.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

als

o

allo

w lo

cal au

tho

riti

es t

o p

erm

it s

hutt

le s

ervic

e veh

icle

s, a

s d

efin

ed, to

sto

p f

or

the

load

ing

or

un

load

ing

of

pas

sen

gers

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Th

is b

ill r

epla

ces

AB

61 b

y sa

me

auth

or

to a

dd

ress

th

e sh

utt

le s

ervic

es'

use

of

tran

sit

sto

ps.

AB

1659

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

13/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Ro

dri

guez

D

(Dis

t 52)

Veh

icle

s: p

rim

a fa

cie

spee

d lim

its:

sch

oo

ls.

Wo

uld

allo

w a

cit

y o

r co

unty

to

est

ablis

h in

a r

esid

ence

d

istr

ict,

on

a h

igh

way

wit

h a

po

sted

sp

eed lim

it o

f 30

mile

s p

er

ho

ur

or

slo

wer

, a

15 m

iles

per

ho

ur

pri

ma

faci

e sp

eed lim

it

wh

en a

pp

roac

hin

g, a

t a

dis

tan

ce o

f le

ss t

han

1,3

20 f

eet

fro

m,

or

pas

sin

g, a

sch

oo

l b

uild

ing

or

gro

un

ds

ther

eof,

co

nti

guo

us

of

to a

hig

hw

ay a

nd

po

sted

wit

h a

sch

oo

l w

arn

ing

sign

th

at

ind

icat

es a

sp

eed

lim

it o

f 15 m

iles

per

ho

ur,

wh

ile c

hild

ren

are

go

ing

to o

r le

avin

g th

e sc

ho

ol,

eith

er d

uri

ng

scho

ol h

ours

or

duri

ng

the

no

on

rec

ess

per

iod. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill e

xpan

ds

limit

ed s

pee

d (

15

mp

h)

zon

e to

1/

4 m

ile o

f a

sch

oo

l.

AB

1677

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

19/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Tin

g D

(D

ist

19)

Veh

icle

s: t

our

buse

s: s

afet

y in

spec

tio

ns.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e dep

artm

ent

to d

evel

op

pro

toco

ls,

in c

on

sult

atio

n w

ith

rep

rese

nta

tives

of

loca

l go

ver

nm

ent,

to

al

low

fo

r th

e in

spec

tio

n o

f to

ur

buse

s b

y a

des

ign

ated

loca

l ag

ency

of

the

loca

l ju

risd

icti

on

in

wh

ich

th

e to

ur

bus

op

erat

es,

and

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

ese

pro

toco

ls t

o in

clude,

at

a m

inim

um

, a

requir

emen

t th

at, upo

n c

om

ple

tio

n o

f an

in

spec

tio

n o

f a

tour

bus,

th

e d

esig

nat

ed lo

cal ag

ency

rep

ort

its

fin

din

gs t

o t

he

Pub

lic U

tilit

ies

Co

mm

issi

on

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e th

at a

ny

insp

ecti

on

co

nd

uct

ed b

y a

des

ign

ated

lo

cal ag

ency

purs

uan

t to

th

ese

pro

toco

ls s

hal

l b

e in

addit

ion

to

, an

d n

ot

in lie

u o

f, a

ny

oth

er insp

ecti

on

req

uir

emen

ts im

po

sed u

nder

law

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Exp

and

s o

n p

rese

nt

Cal

ifo

rnia

H

igh

way

Pat

rol (C

HP

) au

tho

rity

for

regu

lati

ng

safe

op

erat

ion

of

tour

buse

s b

y p

erm

itti

ng

loca

l ag

ency

in

spec

tio

n u

nd

er g

uid

ance

pro

vid

ed

by

CH

P.

18

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

9 o

f 27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1725

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

28/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Wag

ner

R

(Dis

t 68)

Veh

icle

s: a

uto

mat

ed t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

ent

syst

ems.

W

ould

req

uir

e a

dri

ver

fac

ing

a st

eady

circ

ula

r re

d s

ign

al a

lon

e at

a f

reew

ay o

r h

igh

way

on

ram

p s

ign

al, to

sto

p a

t a

mar

ked

limit

lin

e, b

ut

if n

on

e, b

efore

th

e si

gnal

, an

d t

o r

emai

n s

top

ped

un

til an

in

dic

atio

n t

o p

roce

ed is

sho

wn

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

mak

e a

vio

lati

on

of

this

req

uir

emen

t an

in

frac

tio

n p

un

ish

able

by

a fi

ne

of

$50. B

y cr

eati

ng

a n

ew c

rim

e, t

his

bill

wo

uld

im

po

se a

st

ate-

man

dat

ed lo

cal p

rogr

am. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Ad

ds

new

req

uir

emen

t fo

r dri

ver

s to

st

op

at

free

way

or

hig

hw

ay o

nra

mp

si

gnal

un

til au

tho

rize

d t

o p

roce

ed.

AB

X1 1

In

tro

duce

d:

6/

23/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ale

jo D

(D

ist

30)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

pro

vid

es f

or

loan

s of

reven

ues

fro

m v

ario

us

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fun

ds

and a

cco

un

ts t

o t

he

Gen

eral

Fun

d, w

ith

var

ious

rep

aym

ent

dat

es s

pec

ifie

d. T

his

bill

, w

ith

res

pec

t to

an

y lo

ans

mad

e to

th

e G

ener

al F

un

d f

rom

sp

ecif

ied

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fun

ds

and a

cco

un

ts w

ith

a r

epay

men

t dat

e o

f Ja

nuar

y 1, 2019, o

r la

ter,

would

req

uir

e th

e lo

ans

to b

e re

pai

d

by

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2018. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

curr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Sup

po

rt

T

his

bill

man

dat

es t

hat

Sta

te G

ener

al

Fun

d lo

ans

fro

m t

ransp

ort

atio

n

reven

ues

be

rep

aid

.

AB

X1 2

In

tro

duce

d:

6/

25/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Per

ea D

(D

ist

31)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts:

com

pre

hen

sive

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e ag

reem

ents

. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

nd

regi

on

al t

ransp

ort

atio

n a

genci

es, as

def

ined

, to

en

ter

into

co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e ag

reem

ents

wit

h p

ub

lic a

nd

pri

vat

e en

titi

es, o

r co

nso

rtia

of

tho

se e

nti

ties

, fo

r ce

rtai

n

tran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s th

at m

ay c

har

ge c

erta

in u

sers

of

tho

se

pro

ject

s to

lls a

nd

use

r fe

es, s

ub

ject

to

var

ious

term

s an

d

requir

emen

ts. C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es t

hat

a lea

se a

gree

men

t m

ay

no

t b

e en

tere

d in

to u

nder

thes

e p

rovis

ions

on

or

afte

r Ja

nuar

y 1, 2017. T

his

bill

wo

uld

ext

end t

his

auth

ori

zati

on

in

def

init

ely

and

wo

uld

in

clud

e w

ith

in t

he

def

init

ion

of

"reg

ion

al

tran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

" th

e San

ta C

lara

Val

ley

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Auth

ori

ty, t

her

eby

auth

ori

zin

g th

e au

tho

rity

to

ente

r in

to

pub

lic-p

rivat

e p

artn

ersh

ips

un

der

th

ese

pro

vis

ions.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Sup

po

rt

E

xten

ds

pub

lic-p

rivat

e p

artn

ersh

ip

law

in

def

init

ely.

Sim

ilar

to A

B 1

265 (

Per

ea)

and

SB

X1

14 (

Can

nel

la).

19

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

10

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 3

A

men

ded

:

9/

3/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Fra

zier

D

(Dis

t 11)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n t

o

imp

rove

and

mai

nta

in t

he

stat

e's

hig

hw

ays,

an

d e

stab

lish

es

var

ious

pro

gram

s to

fund t

he

dev

elo

pm

ent,

co

nst

ruct

ion

, an

d

rep

air

of

loca

l ro

ads,

bri

dge

s, a

nd o

ther

cri

tica

l tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

infr

astr

uct

ure

in

th

e st

ate.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

dec

lare

th

e in

ten

t o

f th

e L

egis

latu

re t

o e

nac

t le

gisl

atio

n t

o e

stab

lish

per

man

ent,

su

stai

nab

le s

ourc

es o

f tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g to

mai

nta

in a

nd

rep

air

hig

hw

ays,

lo

cal ro

ads,

bri

dge

s, a

nd o

ther

cri

tica

l in

fras

truct

ure

.

Ass

emb

ly

Co

nfe

ren

ce

Co

mm

itte

e

Wat

ch

Sp

ecia

l se

ssio

n s

po

t b

ill.

AB

X1 4

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

9/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Fra

zier

D

(Dis

t 11)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

est

ablis

hes

var

ious

pro

gram

s to

fun

d t

he

dev

elo

pm

ent,

co

nst

ruct

ion

, an

d r

epai

r of

loca

l ro

ads,

bri

dge

s,

and

oth

er c

riti

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

in t

he

stat

e.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

dec

lare

th

e in

ten

t o

f th

e L

egis

latu

re t

o e

nac

t le

gisl

atio

n t

o e

stab

lish

per

man

ent,

sust

ain

able

sourc

es o

f tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g to

im

pro

ve

the

stat

e's

key

tra

de

corr

idors

an

d s

upp

ort

eff

ort

s b

y lo

cal go

ver

nm

ents

to

rep

air

and

im

pro

ve

loca

l tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

.

Sen

ate

Rule

s

Wat

ch

Sp

ecia

l se

ssio

n s

po

t b

ill.

AB

X1 6

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Her

nán

dez

, R

oge

r D

(D

ist

48)

Aff

ord

able

Ho

usi

ng

and S

ust

ain

able

Co

mm

un

itie

s P

rogr

am.

Curr

ent

law

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ates

20%

of

the

ann

ual

p

roce

eds

of

the

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d t

o t

he

Aff

ord

able

Ho

usi

ng

and S

ust

ain

able

Co

mm

un

itie

s P

rogr

am,

adm

inis

tere

d b

y th

e Str

ateg

ic G

row

th C

oun

cil,

to r

educe

gr

een

ho

use

gas

em

issi

ons

thro

ugh

pro

ject

s th

at im

ple

men

t la

nd

use

, h

ousi

ng,

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n, an

d a

gric

ult

ura

l la

nd

pre

serv

atio

n p

ract

ices

to

supp

ort

in

fill

and c

om

pac

t d

evel

op

men

t an

d t

hat

sup

po

rt o

ther

rel

ated

an

d c

oo

rdin

ated

p

ub

lic p

olic

y o

bje

ctiv

es. T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e 20%

of

mo

ney

s av

aila

ble

fo

r al

loca

tio

n u

nder

th

e p

rogr

am t

o b

e al

loca

ted

to

elig

ible

pro

ject

s in

rura

l ar

eas,

as

def

ined

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Op

pose

T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e 20%

of

the

affo

rdab

le h

ousi

ng

pro

gram

un

der

ca

p a

nd

tra

de

go t

o p

roje

cts

in r

ura

l ar

eas.

20

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

11

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 7

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Naz

aria

n D

(D

ist

46)

Pub

lic t

ran

sit:

fun

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es a

ll m

on

eys,

exc

ept

for

fin

es a

nd p

enal

ties

, co

llect

ed b

y th

e Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d f

rom

th

e au

ctio

n o

r sa

le o

f al

low

ance

s as

par

t o

f a

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m r

elat

ive

to r

educt

ion

of

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

on

s to

be

dep

osi

ted

in

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d. T

his

b

ill w

ould

inst

ead

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

20%

of

tho

se

ann

ual

pro

ceed

s to

th

e T

ransi

t an

d I

nte

rcit

y R

ail C

apit

al

Pro

gram

, an

d 1

0%

of

tho

se a

nn

ual

pro

ceed

s to

th

e L

ow

C

arb

on

Tra

nsi

t O

per

atio

ns

Pro

gram

, th

ereb

y m

akin

g an

ap

pro

pri

atio

n. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er c

urr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Sup

po

rt

Th

e b

ill w

ould

see

k t

o in

crea

se c

ap

and

tra

de

reven

ues

to

2 t

ransi

t p

rogr

ams:

(1)

rail

cap

ital

an

d (

2)t

ransi

t o

per

atio

ns.

Th

is b

ill is

the

sam

e as

SB

X1 8

(H

ill).

AB

X1 8

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ch

iu D

(D

ist

17)

Die

sel sa

les

and

use

tax

. W

ould

, ef

fect

ive

July

1, 2016

, in

crea

se t

he

addit

ion

al s

ales

an

d

use

tax

rat

e o

n d

iese

l fu

el t

o 5

.25%

. B

y in

crea

sin

g th

e re

ven

ues

d

epo

site

d in

a c

on

tin

uo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ated

fund, th

e b

ill w

ould

th

ereb

y m

ake

an a

pp

rop

riat

ion

. T

his

bill

con

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

p

rovis

ion

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

W

atch

T

he

bill

see

ks

to in

crea

se S

tate

tra

nsi

t as

sist

ance

fun

ds

by

incr

easi

ng

the

sale

s ta

x ra

te a

nd

die

sel.

Th

is b

ill is

the

sam

e as

SB

X1 7

(A

llen

).

AB

X1 9

In

tro

duce

d:

8/

17/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lev

ine

D

(Dis

t 10)

Ric

hm

on

d-S

an R

afae

l B

ridge

. W

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n,

imm

edia

tely

, o

r as

so

on

as

pra

ctic

ally

fea

sib

le, b

ut

no

lat

er t

han

Sep

tem

ber

30, 2015, t

o im

ple

men

t an

op

erat

ion

al

imp

rovem

ent

pro

ject

th

at t

emp

ora

rily

res

tore

s th

e th

ird

east

bo

un

d lan

e o

n S

tate

Hig

hw

ay R

oute

580 f

rom

th

e b

egin

nin

g o

f th

e R

ich

mo

nd

-San

Raf

ael B

ridge

in

th

e C

oun

ty

of

Mar

in t

o M

arin

e Str

eet

in t

he

Co

un

ty o

f C

on

tra

Co

sta

to

auto

mo

bile

tra

ffic

an

d t

hat

tem

po

rari

ly c

on

ver

ts a

sp

ecif

ied

po

rtio

n o

f an

exi

stin

g o

ne-

way

bic

ycle

lan

e al

on

g th

e n

ort

h

sid

e o

f Sta

te H

igh

way

Ro

ute

580 in

th

e C

ounty

of

Co

ntr

a C

ost

a in

to a

bid

irec

tio

nal

bic

ycle

an

d p

edes

tria

n lan

e.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Th

is a

uth

or

is a

ddre

ssin

g a

con

gest

ion

iss

ue

affl

icti

ng

Mar

in a

nd

C

on

tra

Co

sta

Co

un

ties

by

man

dat

ory

C

altr

ans

to r

esto

re a

3rd

lan

e o

n

Ric

hm

on

d b

rid

ge.

21

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

12

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 1

0 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

19/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lev

ine

D

(Dis

t 10)

Pub

lic w

ork

s: c

on

trac

ts: ex

tra

com

pen

sati

on

. W

ould

pro

vid

e th

at a

sta

te e

nti

ty in

a m

egai

nfr

astr

uct

ure

p

roje

ct c

on

trac

t, a

s def

ined

, may

no

t p

rovid

e fo

r th

e p

aym

ent

of

extr

a co

mp

ensa

tio

n t

o t

he

con

trac

tor

un

til th

e m

egai

nfr

astr

uct

ure

pro

ject

, as

def

ined

, h

as b

een

co

mp

lete

d

and

an

in

dep

end

ent

thir

d p

arty

has

ver

ifie

d t

hat

th

e m

egai

nfr

astr

uct

ure

pro

ject

mee

ts a

ll ar

chit

ectu

ral o

r en

gin

eeri

ng

pla

ns

and s

afet

y sp

ecif

icat

ion

s o

f th

e co

ntr

act.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

ap

ply

to

co

ntr

acts

en

tere

d in

to o

r am

ended

on

o

r af

ter

the

effe

ctiv

e dat

e o

f th

is b

ill.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Wo

uld

res

tric

t st

ate

agen

cies

fro

m

pro

vid

ing

extr

a p

aym

ents

to

co

ntr

acto

rs o

n m

ega

infr

astr

uct

ure

p

roje

cts.

AB

X1 1

3 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gro

ve

R

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d: st

reet

s an

d h

igh

way

s.

Wo

uld

red

uce

th

e co

nti

nuo

us

app

rop

riat

ion

to

th

e Str

ateg

ic

Gro

wth

Coun

cil fo

r th

e A

ffo

rdab

le H

ousi

ng

and S

ust

ainab

le

Co

mm

un

itie

s P

rogr

am b

y hal

f. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

O

pp

ose

T

he

bill

wo

uld

red

uce

fun

ds

fro

m

cap

an

d t

rad

e fo

r th

e A

fford

able

H

ousi

ng

and

Sust

ain

able

C

om

mun

itie

s co

mp

etit

ive

gran

t p

rogr

am b

y h

alf

and

ded

icat

e th

e sa

vin

gs t

o r

oad

rep

air.

AB

X1 1

4 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Wal

dro

n R

Sta

te H

igh

way

Op

erat

ion

and P

rote

ctio

n P

rogr

am: lo

cal

stre

ets

and

ro

ads:

ap

pro

pri

atio

n.

Wo

uld

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

$1 b

illio

n f

rom

th

e G

ener

al

Fun

d, w

ith

50%

to

be

mad

e av

aila

ble

to

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

fo

r m

ain

ten

ance

of

the

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

or

for

purp

ose

s o

f th

e Sta

te H

igh

way

Op

erat

ion

an

d P

rote

ctio

n

Pro

gram

, an

d 5

0%

to

be

mad

e av

aila

ble

to

th

e C

on

tro

ller

for

app

ort

ion

men

t to

cit

ies

and c

oun

ties

by

a sp

ecif

ied f

orm

ula

fo

r st

reet

and

ro

ad p

urp

ose

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill r

efle

cts

an e

vo

lvin

g co

nce

pt

by

Ass

emb

ly R

epublic

ans

to

seek

ro

ad im

pro

vem

ent

fund

ing

fro

m e

xist

ing

stat

e re

sourc

es,

ob

via

tin

g th

e n

eed

fo

r n

ew t

axes

.

22

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

13

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 1

5 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Pat

ters

on

R

Sta

te H

igh

way

Op

erat

ion

and P

rote

ctio

n P

rogr

am (

SH

OP

P):

lo

cal st

reet

s an

d r

oad

s: a

pp

rop

riat

ion

. W

ould

red

uce

th

e $6

63,2

87,0

00 a

pp

rop

riat

ion

fo

r C

apit

al

Outl

ay S

up

po

rt b

y $5

00 m

illio

n, an

d w

ould

ap

pro

pri

ate

$500

mill

ion

fro

m t

he

Sta

te H

ighw

ay A

cco

un

t fo

r th

e 2015-1

6 f

isca

l ye

ar, w

ith

50%

to

be

mad

e av

aila

ble

to

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

fo

r m

ain

ten

ance

of

the

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

or

for

purp

ose

s o

f th

e SH

OP

P, a

nd 5

0%

to

be

mad

e av

aila

ble

to

th

e C

on

tro

ller

for

app

ort

ionm

ent

to c

itie

s an

d c

ounti

es b

y fo

rmula

fo

r st

reet

an

d r

oad

purp

ose

s. T

his

bill co

nta

ins

oth

er

exis

tin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill r

efle

cts

an e

vo

lvin

g co

nce

pt

by

Ass

emb

ly R

epublic

ans

to s

eek

road

im

pro

vem

ent

fun

din

g fr

om

ex

isti

ng

stat

e re

sourc

es, o

bvia

tin

g th

e n

eed

fo

r n

ew t

axes

. W

ould

red

uce

Cal

tran

s st

aff

cost

s b

y $5

00 m

illio

n a

nd

see

k a

lik

e am

oun

t fr

oth

Sta

te H

igh

way

Acc

ount

to b

e d

edic

ated

fo

r st

ate

and

lo

cal ro

ad

rep

airs

.

AB

X1 1

6 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Pat

ters

on

R

Sta

te h

igh

way

s: t

ran

sfer

to

lo

cal ag

enci

es: p

ilot

pro

gram

. W

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n (

Cal

tran

s) t

o

par

tici

pat

e in

a p

ilot

pro

gram

over

a 5

-yea

r p

erio

d u

nder

wh

ich

2 c

oun

ties

, o

ne

in n

ort

her

n C

alif

orn

ia a

nd o

ne

in s

outh

ern

C

alif

orn

ia, ar

e se

lect

ed t

o o

per

ate,

mai

nta

in, an

d m

ake

imp

rovem

ents

to

all

stat

e h

igh

way

s, in

cludin

g fr

eew

ays,

in

th

e af

fect

ed c

oun

ty. T

he

bill

would

req

uir

e th

e dep

artm

ent,

wit

h

resp

ect

to t

ho

se c

oun

ties

, fo

r th

e dura

tio

n o

f th

e p

ilot

pro

gram

, to

co

nvey

all

of

its

auth

ori

ty a

nd r

espo

nsi

bili

ty o

ver

st

ate

hig

hw

ays

in t

he

county

to

a c

oun

ty, or

a re

gio

nal

tr

ansp

ort

atio

n a

gen

cy t

hat

has

juri

sdic

tio

n in

th

e co

unty

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Inte

nd

ed t

o t

est

the

effi

cien

cy o

f C

altr

ans

by

auth

ori

zin

g a

pilo

t p

rogr

am in

wh

ich

tw

o c

oun

ties

w

ould

be

able

to

ass

um

e C

altr

ans’

re

spo

nsi

bili

ty f

or

op

erat

ing

and

m

ain

tain

ing

hig

hw

ays

wit

h t

he

coun

ty.

AB

X1 1

7 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ach

adjia

n R

G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d: st

ate

hig

hw

ay o

per

atio

n

and

pro

tect

ion

pro

gram

. C

urr

ent

law

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ates

60%

of

the

ann

ual

p

roce

eds

of

the

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d f

or

tran

sit,

af

ford

able

ho

usi

ng,

sust

ain

able

co

mm

un

itie

s, a

nd h

igh

-sp

eed

rail

purp

ose

s. T

his

bill

, b

egin

nin

g in

th

e 2016-1

7 f

isca

l ye

ar,

wo

uld

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

25%

of

the

ann

ual

pro

ceed

s o

f th

e fu

nd

to

fund

pro

ject

s in

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay o

per

atio

n a

nd

pro

tect

ion

pro

gram

.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Op

pose

T

his

mea

sure

wo

uld

see

k t

o

sup

ple

men

t st

ate

reh

abili

tati

on

p

rogr

am w

ith

25%

of

cap

and

tra

de

reso

urc

es.

23

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

14

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 1

8 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lin

der

R

Veh

icle

wei

ght

fees

: tr

ansp

ort

atio

n b

on

d d

ebt

serv

ice.

W

ould

, n

otw

ith

stan

din

g th

ese

pro

vis

ions

or

any

oth

er law

, ef

fect

ive

Jan

uar

y 1, 2016, pro

hib

it w

eigh

t fe

e re

ven

ue

fro

m

bei

ng

tran

sfer

red

fro

m t

he

Sta

te H

igh

way

Acc

oun

t to

th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Deb

t Ser

vic

e F

un

d o

r to

th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

B

on

d D

irec

t P

aym

ent

Acc

oun

t, a

nd f

rom

bei

ng

use

d t

o p

ay

the

deb

t se

rvic

e o

n t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

gen

eral

ob

ligat

ion

bo

nds.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Th

is m

easu

re w

ould

see

k t

he

retu

rn

of

truck

wei

ght

fees

to

sta

te h

igh

way

re

hab

ilita

tio

n p

urp

ose

s.

AB

X1 1

9 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Lin

der

R

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n.

Wo

uld

exc

lud

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

fr

om

th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

an

d e

stab

lish

it

as a

n e

nti

ty in

th

e st

ate

gover

nm

ent. T

he

bill

wo

uld

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

chan

ges.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill r

e-es

tab

lish

es t

he

ind

epen

den

ce o

f th

e C

TC

form

th

e A

dm

inis

trat

ion

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Age

ncy

.

AB

X1 2

0 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Gai

nes

, B

eth

R

Sta

te g

over

nm

ent:

elim

inat

ion

of

vac

ant

posi

tion

s:

tran

spo

rtat

ion

: ap

pro

pri

atio

n.

Curr

ent

law

est

ablis

hes

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f H

um

an R

esourc

es

in s

tate

go

ver

nm

ent

to o

per

ate

the

stat

e ci

vil

serv

ice

syst

em.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e dep

artm

ent

to e

limin

ate

25%

of

the

vac

ant

po

siti

on

s in

sta

te g

ove

rnm

ent

that

are

fun

ded

by

the

Gen

eral

Fun

d. T

his

bill

con

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er c

urr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Th

is R

epub

lican

Cau

cus

mea

sure

w

ould

see

k t

he

elim

inat

ion

of

vac

ant

po

siti

on

s in

sta

te g

over

nm

ent

and

d

edic

ate

the

fun

ds

the

free

d t

o b

e d

edic

ated

to

ro

ad r

epai

rs.

AB

X1 2

1 In

tro

duce

d:

8/

31/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ob

ern

olt

e R

E

nvir

on

men

tal qual

ity:

hig

hw

ay p

roje

cts.

W

ould

pro

hib

it a

co

urt

in

a judic

ial ac

tio

n o

r pro

ceed

ing

un

der

C

alif

orn

ia E

nvir

on

men

tal Q

ual

ity

Act

(C

EQ

A)

fro

m s

tayi

ng

or

enjo

inin

g th

e co

nst

ruct

ion

or

imp

rovem

ent

of

a h

ighw

ay

un

less

it

mak

es s

pec

ifie

d f

indin

gs.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

Wat

ch

Ext

end

s to

hig

hw

ay p

roje

cts

jud

icia

l re

lief

fro

m a

CE

QA

ch

alle

nge

in

ce

rtai

n c

ases

.

24

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

15

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

X1 2

5 In

tro

duce

d:

1/

11/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Alle

n,

Tra

vis

R

(Dis

t 72)

Sh

utt

le s

ervic

es: lo

adin

g an

d u

nlo

adin

g o

f p

asse

nge

rs.

Un

der

curr

ent

law

, a

per

son

may

no

t st

op

, p

ark, o

r le

ave

a veh

icle

sta

nd

ing

alo

ngs

ide

a cu

rb s

pac

e au

tho

rize

d f

or

the

load

ing

or

un

load

ing

of

pas

sen

gers

of

a b

us

enga

ged a

s a

com

mo

n c

arri

er in

lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n w

hen

in

dic

ated

by

a si

gn o

r re

d p

ain

t o

n t

he

curb

, ex

cep

t th

at c

urr

ent

law

allo

ws

loca

l au

tho

riti

es t

o p

erm

it s

cho

ol b

use

s to

sto

p a

lon

gsid

e th

ese

curb

sp

aces

up

on

agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n a

tra

nsi

t sy

stem

o

per

atin

g b

use

s as

co

mm

on

car

rier

s in

lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n a

nd

a

pub

lic s

cho

ol d

istr

ict

or

pri

vat

e sc

ho

ol.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

als

o

allo

w lo

cal au

tho

riti

es t

o p

erm

it s

hutt

le s

ervic

e veh

icle

s, a

s d

efin

ed, to

sto

p f

or

the

load

ing

or

un

load

ing

of

pas

sen

gers

al

on

gsid

e th

ese

curb

sp

aces

up

on

agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n a

tra

nsi

t sy

stem

op

erat

ing

buse

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

A 2

nd

bill

by

the

auth

or

to r

epla

ce

AB

61 r

elat

ed t

o s

hutt

le s

ervi

ce

buse

s.

Bill

is

also

sam

e as

AB

1641

(Alle

n, T

ravis

).

AC

A 4

A

men

ded

:

8/

17/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Fra

zier

D

(Dis

t 11)

Lo

cal go

ver

nm

ent

tran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s: s

pec

ial ta

xes:

vo

ter

app

roval

. W

ould

pro

vid

e th

at t

he

impo

siti

on

, ex

ten

sion

, o

r in

crea

se o

f a

sale

s an

d u

se t

ax im

po

sed p

urs

uan

t to

th

e B

radle

y-B

urn

s U

nif

orm

Lo

cal Sal

es a

nd U

se T

ax L

aw o

r a

tran

sact

ion

s an

d

use

tax

im

po

sed

in

acc

ord

ance

wit

h t

he

Tra

nsa

ctio

ns

and U

se

Tax

Law

by

a co

un

ty, ci

ty, ci

ty a

nd c

oun

ty, or

spec

ial dis

tric

t fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

of

pro

vid

ing

fun

din

g fo

r lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

pro

ject

s, a

s d

efin

ed, r

equir

es t

he

app

roval

of

55%

of

its

vote

rs

vo

tin

g o

n t

he

pro

po

siti

on

. Th

e m

easu

re w

ould

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

and

tec

hn

ical

, no

nsu

bst

anti

ve

chan

ges.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Susp

ense

File

Sup

po

rt

T

his

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e vo

ters

th

e o

pp

ort

un

ity

to r

educe

th

e re

quir

emen

t fo

r ap

pro

val

of

futu

re

spec

ial ta

xes

for

tran

spo

rtat

ion

p

urp

ose

s w

ith

a 5

5%

maj

ori

ty.

25

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

16

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

1

Intr

od

uce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f

htm

l

Gai

nes

R

(Dis

t 1)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006:

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

on

s A

ct o

f 2006

auth

ori

zes

the

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d t

o in

clude

the

use

of

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s. C

urr

ent

stat

e boar

d

regu

lati

on

s re

quir

e sp

ecif

ied e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Jan

uar

y 1,

2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al s

pec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Januar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

inst

ead w

ould

exe

mp

t ca

tego

ries

of

per

son

s o

r en

titi

es t

hat

did

not

hav

e a

com

plia

nce

ob

ligat

ion

, as

d

efin

ed, un

der

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, f

rom

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

.

Sen

ate

E

nvir

on

men

tal

Qual

ity

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

elim

inat

e th

e ex

ten

sio

n o

f C

ap a

nd

Tra

de

emis

sion

re

gula

tio

ns

sch

edule

d f

or

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fuel

s sy

stem

. D

iffe

rs f

rom

AB

23 a

s th

is b

ill

per

man

entl

y pro

hib

its

the

Cap

an

d

Tra

de

regu

lati

on

s fr

om

aff

ecti

ng

the

fuel

s se

cto

r.

SB

5

Intr

od

uce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f

htm

l

Vid

ak R

(D

ist

14)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006:

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. U

nd

er t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

on

s A

ct o

f 20

06,

curr

ent

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d r

egula

tio

ns

requir

e sp

ecif

ied

enti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al s

pec

ifie

d

enti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

in

stea

d w

ould

ex

emp

t ca

tego

ries

of

per

son

s o

r en

titi

es t

hat

did

no

t h

ave

a co

mp

lian

ce o

blig

atio

n, as

def

ined

, un

der

a m

arket

-bas

ed

com

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Jan

uar

y 1, 2013, f

rom

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

th

rough

D

ecem

ber

31, 2020.

Sen

ate

E

nvir

on

men

tal

Qual

ity

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

po

stp

on

e th

e ef

fect

ive

dat

e o

f th

e ex

ten

sion

of

Cap

an

d T

rad

e em

issi

on

reg

ula

tio

ns

fro

m

2015 t

o 2

020 s

ched

ule

d f

or

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fuel

s sy

stem

. T

he

auth

or

is c

on

cern

ed t

hat

th

e p

ub

lic w

ill b

e su

bje

ct t

o a

spik

e in

fu

el p

rice

s.

Ho

wev

er, th

e ef

fect

of

the

def

erre

d

will

be

to r

educe

Cap

an

d T

rad

e au

ctio

n r

even

ues

.

26

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

17

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

16

Am

ended

:

6/

1/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Wo

uld

cre

ate

the

Ro

ad M

ainte

nan

ce a

nd R

ehab

ilita

tio

n

Pro

gram

to

ad

dre

ss d

efer

red m

ain

ten

ance

on

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay

syst

em a

nd

th

e lo

cal st

reet

an

d r

oad

sys

tem

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

p

rovid

e fo

r th

e p

rogr

am t

o b

e au

tho

rize

d e

ver

y 5 y

ears

by

the

Leg

isla

ture

, an

d w

ould

pro

vid

e th

at a

uth

ori

zati

on

fo

r th

e 2015-1

6 t

hro

ugh

2019-2

0 f

isca

l ye

ars.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

to

iden

tify

th

e es

tim

ated

fun

ds

to b

e av

aila

ble

fo

r th

e p

rogr

am a

nd a

dop

t p

erfo

rman

ce c

rite

ria

to e

nsu

re e

ffic

ien

t use

of

the

fun

ds.

Sen

ate

Inac

tive

File

Sup

po

rt a

nd

See

k

Am

end

men

t

Lat

est

amen

dm

ents

ref

lect

a m

ajo

r n

ew s

tate

/lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

fun

din

g b

ill. I

t w

ould

pro

vid

e $3

-4

bill

ion

+, an

nual

ly, fo

r 5 y

ears

, to

fu

nd

sta

te a

nd

lo

cal ro

ad r

epai

r.

Rai

ses

gas

tax

.10 c

ents

per

gal

., d

iese

l .1

2 c

ents

per

gal

., V

RF

by

$35

and

VL

F b

y .3

5%.

We

are

wo

rkin

g w

ith

th

e M

ayo

r’s

Off

ice

and

par

tner

age

nci

es t

o s

eek

amen

dm

ents

th

at w

ould

pro

vid

e fl

exib

ility

to

use

fun

ds

for

tran

sit

and

to

mak

e th

e re

ven

ue

mea

sure

s p

erm

anen

t.

We

are

also

con

cern

ed

that

th

e V

LF

in

crea

se w

ould

dec

reas

e fu

nd

ing

avai

lab

le if

San

Fra

nci

sco

p

asse

s it

s o

wn

VL

F in

crea

se, w

hic

h is

curr

entl

y p

lan

ned

to

be

pla

ced

on

th

e b

allo

t in

No

vem

ber

2016.

Sim

ilar

bill

intr

od

uce

d in

Spec

ial

Ses

sio

n: S

BX

1-1 (

Bea

ll). T

his

bill

is

likel

y d

ead

.

SB

39

Am

ended

:

4/

8/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Pav

ley

D

(Dis

t 27)

Veh

icle

s: h

igh

-occ

up

ancy

veh

icle

lan

es.

Curr

ent

fed

eral

law

, un

til Sep

tem

ber

30, 2017, au

tho

rize

s a

stat

e to

allo

w s

pec

ifie

d lab

eled

veh

icle

s to

use

lan

es d

esig

nat

ed

for

hig

h-o

ccup

ancy

veh

icle

s (H

OV

s). C

urr

entt

law

auth

ori

zes

the

DM

V t

o iss

ue

no

mo

re t

han

70,0

00 o

f th

ose

iden

tifi

ers.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

crea

se t

he

num

ber

of

tho

se iden

tifi

ers

that

th

e D

MV

is

auth

ori

zed t

o iss

ue

to a

n u

nsp

ecif

ied a

mo

un

t.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and o

ther

curr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Op

pose

T

he

bill

wo

uld

exp

and

th

e am

oun

t of

HO

V lan

e ac

cess

dec

als

for

clea

n

veh

icle

s. 2

014 s

aw t

he

num

ber

of

dec

als

per

mit

ted

, in

crea

se f

rom

40,0

00 t

o 7

0,0

00.

Bud

get

trai

ler

bill

was

app

roved

to

ac

com

plis

h t

his

.

27

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

18

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

254

Am

ended

:

6/

2/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Alle

n D

(D

ist

26)

Sta

te h

igh

way

s: r

elin

quis

hm

ent.

C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es f

or

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Co

mm

issi

on

(C

TC

) to

rel

inquis

h t

o lo

cal ag

enci

es s

tate

h

igh

way

seg

men

ts t

hat

hav

e b

een

del

eted

fro

m t

he

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

by

legi

slat

ive

enac

tmen

t o

r h

ave

bee

n

sup

erse

ded

by

relo

cati

on

, an

d in

cer

tain

oth

er c

ases

. T

his

bill

w

ould

rev

ise

and

rec

ast

thes

e p

rovis

ion

s to

del

ete

the

requir

emen

t th

at t

he

po

rtio

n t

o b

e re

linquis

hed

be

del

eted

fr

om

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m b

y le

gisl

ativ

e en

actm

ent

or

sup

erse

ded

by

relo

cati

on

.

Ass

emb

ly 2

yea

r W

atch

Th

is b

ill a

uth

ori

zes

the

CT

C t

o

relin

quis

h p

ort

ion

s o

f th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m t

o a

co

un

ty o

r ci

ty

wit

ho

ut

legi

slat

ive

acti

on

. T

his

p

roce

ss w

ould

no

t ap

ply

to

ro

ute

se

gmen

ts o

n t

he

inte

rreg

ion

al r

oad

sy

stem

in

sta

tute

. A

bud

get

trai

ler

bill

was

ap

pro

ved

to

ac

com

plis

h t

he

goal

s of

this

bill

.

SB

321

Am

ended

:

8/

18/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Mo

tor

veh

icle

fuel

tax

es: r

ates

: ad

just

men

ts.

Wo

uld

, fo

r th

e 2016/17 f

isca

l ye

ar a

nd e

ach

fis

cal ye

ar

ther

eaft

er, r

equir

e th

e Sta

te B

oar

d o

f E

qual

izat

ion

on

Mar

ch 1

o

f th

e fi

scal

yea

r im

med

iate

ly p

rece

din

g th

e ap

plic

able

fis

cal

year

, as

sp

ecif

ied

, to

adju

st t

he

rate

in

a m

ann

er a

s to

gen

erat

e an

am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ue

equal

to

th

e am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ue

loss

at

trib

uta

ble

to

th

e ex

emp

tio

n, b

ased

on

est

imat

es m

ade

by

the

bo

ard

th

at r

efle

ct t

he

com

bin

ed a

ver

age

of

the

actu

al f

uel

pri

ce

over

th

e pre

vio

us

4 f

isca

l ye

ars

and t

he

esti

mat

ed f

uel

pri

ce f

or

the

curr

ent

fisc

al y

ear,

an

d c

on

tin

uin

g to

tak

e in

to a

cco

un

t ad

just

men

ts r

equir

ed b

y ex

isti

ng

law

to

mai

nta

in r

even

ue

neu

tral

ity

for

each

yea

r. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Sen

ate

Inac

tive

File

Sup

po

rt

T

his

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e m

ore

fl

exib

ility

to

th

e B

oar

d o

f E

qual

izat

ion

in

est

ablis

hin

g an

nual

ga

s ex

cise

tax

rat

es b

y ex

tend

ing

the

per

iod

fro

m 3

to

5 y

ears

to

en

sure

"r

even

ue

neu

tral

ity"

. T

his

wo

uld

ad

dre

ss t

he

vo

lati

lity

no

w o

bse

rved

in

th

e an

nual

tax

-rat

e-se

ttin

g p

roce

ss.

SB

433

Am

ended

:

5/

7/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ber

ryh

ill R

(D

ist

8)

Mo

tor

veh

icle

fuel

tax

es: d

iese

l fu

el t

axes

: rat

es: ad

just

men

ts.

Wo

uld

, fo

r th

e 2016-1

7 fi

scal

yea

r to

th

e 2020 -

21 f

isca

l ye

ar,

incl

usi

ve,

on

or

bef

ore

May

15 o

f th

e fi

scal

yea

r im

med

iate

ly

pre

ced

ing

the

app

licab

le f

isca

l ye

ar, in

stea

d r

equir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f F

inan

ce t

o a

dju

st t

he

mo

tor

veh

icle

fuel

tax

ra

te a

s d

escr

ibed

ab

ove,

an

d w

ould

req

uir

e th

e dep

artm

ent

to

no

tify

th

e b

oar

d o

f th

e ra

te a

dju

stm

ent

effe

ctiv

e fo

r th

e st

ate'

s n

ext

fisc

al y

ear,

as

pro

vid

ed. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly 2

yea

r W

atch

Sh

ifts

res

po

nsi

bili

ty f

rom

Boar

d o

f E

qual

izat

ion

to

Dep

artm

ent

of

Fin

ance

fo

r an

nual

gas

tax

rat

e.

28

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

19

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

564

Intr

od

uce

d:

2/

26/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Can

nel

la R

(D

ist

12)

Veh

icle

s: s

cho

ol zo

ne

fin

es.

Curr

ent

law

, in

th

e ca

se o

f sp

ecif

ied v

iola

tio

ns

rela

tin

g to

rule

s o

f th

e ro

ad a

nd

dri

vin

g un

der

th

e in

fluen

ce, do

ub

les

the

fin

e in

th

e ca

se o

f m

isd

emea

no

rs, an

d in

crea

ses

the

fin

e, a

s sp

ecif

ied,

in t

he

case

of

infr

acti

on

s, if

the

vio

lati

on

is

com

mit

ted b

y th

e d

river

of

a veh

icle

wit

hin

a h

igh

way

co

nst

ruct

ion

or

mai

nte

nan

ce a

rea

duri

ng

any

tim

e w

hen

tra

ffic

is

regu

late

d o

r re

stri

cted

by

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n o

r lo

cal

auth

ori

ties

purs

uan

t to

exi

stin

g la

w o

r is

com

mit

ted w

ith

in a

d

esig

nat

ed S

afet

y E

nh

ance

men

t-D

oub

le F

ine

Zo

ne.

Th

is b

ill

wo

uld

als

o r

equir

e th

at a

n a

ddit

ion

al f

ine

of

$35 b

e im

po

sed if

the

vio

lati

on

occ

urr

ed w

hen

pas

sin

g a

sch

oo

l b

uild

ing

or

sch

oo

l gr

oun

ds,

as

spec

ifie

d.

Ass

emb

ly 2

yea

r Sup

po

rt

Incr

ease

s fi

nes

for

traf

fic

vio

lati

on

s n

ear

sch

oo

ls. Sim

ilar

bill

pas

sed

las

t ye

ar, b

ut

was

vet

oed

by

Go

vern

or.

SF

MT

A h

as a

lso

ad

opte

d a

sup

po

rt

po

siti

on

on

th

is b

ill.

29

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

20

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

812

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

4/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Hill

D

(Dis

t 13)

To

ur

bus

insp

ecti

on

fee

s: c

har

ter-

par

ty c

arri

ers

of

pas

senge

rs

and

pas

sen

ger

stag

e co

rpo

rati

on

s.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f th

e C

alif

orn

ia

Hig

hw

ay P

atro

l (C

HP

), b

y re

gula

tio

n, to

dev

elo

p a

nd a

do

pt

bus

term

inal

insp

ecti

on

fee

s ap

plic

able

to

ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

s o

f p

asse

nge

rs a

nd

pas

sen

ger

stag

e co

rpo

rati

on

s th

at o

per

ate

on

e o

r m

ore

to

ur

buse

s, t

o r

epla

ce e

xist

ing

fees

, in

an

am

oun

t su

ffic

ien

t to

off

set

the

cost

s to

adm

inis

ter

the

insp

ecti

on

p

rogr

am f

or

thes

e co

mp

anie

s, a

s sp

ecif

ied. T

he

bill

wo

uld

re

quir

e th

e fe

es t

o b

e co

llect

ed b

y th

e P

ub

lic U

tilit

ies

Co

mm

issi

on

in

th

e ca

se o

f ch

arte

r-p

arty

car

rier

s of

pas

sen

gers

o

r as

oth

erw

ise

requir

ed b

y th

e re

gula

tio

ns.

Th

e bill

wo

uld

m

ake

oth

er c

on

form

ing

chan

ges.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e C

HP

, b

y re

gula

tio

n, to

mo

dif

y it

s ex

isti

ng

tour

bus

term

inal

in

spec

tio

n p

rogr

am t

o e

nsu

re t

hat

th

e pro

gram

is

per

form

ance

-bas

ed, w

ith

par

amet

ers

to e

val

uat

e an

d t

arge

t o

n-s

ite

insp

ecti

on

s to

ur

of

buse

s op

erat

ed b

y or

for

char

ter-

par

ty c

arri

ers

of

pas

sen

gers

an

d p

asse

nge

r st

age

corp

ora

tio

ns.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e to

ur

bus

term

inal

in

spec

tio

n p

rogr

am t

o p

riori

tize

new

ly a

cquir

ed t

our

buse

s o

per

ated

by

char

ter-

par

ty c

arri

ers

of

pas

sen

gers

and p

asse

nge

r st

age

corp

ora

tio

ns,

as

wel

l as

aff

ecte

d c

om

pan

ies

that

are

n

on

com

plia

nt

or

hav

e a

his

tory

of

no

nco

mp

lian

ce w

ith

saf

ety

law

s o

r re

gula

tio

ns.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

als

o r

equir

e n

o f

ewer

th

an

25%

of

the

tota

l n

um

ber

of

tour

bus

carr

ier

insp

ecti

on

s co

nd

uct

ed b

y th

e C

HP

to

be

un

ann

oun

ced s

urp

rise

in

spec

tio

ns.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e a

char

ter-

par

ty c

arri

er o

f p

asse

nge

rs o

r a

pas

sen

ger

stag

e co

rpo

rati

on

, p

rior

to o

per

atin

g a

new

ly a

cquir

ed t

our

bus,

to

fir

st s

ched

ule

an

insp

ecti

on

of

the

tour

bus

wit

h, an

d o

bta

in a

sat

isfa

cto

ry r

atin

g fo

r th

e to

ur

bus

fro

m, t

he

dep

artm

ent.

Sen

ate

Pri

nt

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

Th

is is

a m

ajor

over

hau

l o

f th

e st

atute

s th

at g

over

n t

our

bus

safe

ty.

Th

e b

ill im

po

ses

mo

re d

irec

t fe

e-se

ttin

g au

tho

rity

bas

ed o

n c

ost

s to

ad

min

iste

r th

e sa

fety

pro

gram

; gi

ves

new

pri

ori

ty t

o in

spec

tio

ns

to

pri

ori

tize

new

buse

s at

co

mpan

ies

wit

h h

isto

ry o

f n

on

com

plia

nce

an

d

requir

es 2

5% o

f b

us

insp

ecti

on

to

be

un

ann

oun

ced

. T

he

SF

MT

A h

as t

aken

a s

upp

ort

p

osi

tio

n o

n t

his

bill

.

30

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

21

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

824

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

7/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Lo

w C

arb

on

Tra

nsi

t O

per

atio

ns

Pro

gram

. W

ould

auth

ori

ze a

rec

ipie

nt

tran

sit

agen

cy t

hat

do

es n

ot

sub

mit

a p

roje

ct f

or

fun

din

g un

der

th

e L

ow

Car

bo

n T

ran

sit

Op

erat

ion

s P

rogr

am in

a p

arti

cula

r fi

scal

yea

r to

ret

ain

its

fu

nd

ing

shar

e fo

r ex

pen

dit

ure

in

a s

ub

sequen

t fi

scal

yea

r. T

he

bill

wo

uld

, in

th

at r

egar

d, r

equir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

to

an

nual

ly c

alcu

late

a f

un

din

g sh

are

for

each

el

igib

le r

ecip

ien

t tr

ansi

t ag

ency

. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er

exis

tin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

T

ransp

ort

atio

n

and H

ousi

ng

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

Th

e b

ill is

inte

nd

ed t

o p

erm

it t

ransi

t ag

enci

es m

ore

fle

xib

le u

se o

f fo

rmula

tr

ansi

t fu

nd

s fr

om

GG

RF

.

SB

874

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

14/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Gai

nes

R

(Dis

t 1)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n n

etw

ork

com

pan

ies

(TN

Cs)

. T

he

Pas

sen

ger

Ch

arte

r-p

arty

Car

rier

s' A

ct p

rovid

es f

or

the

regu

lati

on

of

char

ter-

par

ty c

arri

ers

of

pas

sen

gers

by

the

Pub

lic

Uti

litie

s C

om

mis

sio

n a

nd incl

udes

req

uir

emen

ts f

or

liab

ility

in

sura

nce

co

ver

age

for

tran

spo

rtat

ion

net

work

co

mp

anie

s, a

s d

efin

ed, an

d t

hei

r p

arti

cip

atin

g dri

ver

s, a

s def

ined

. T

his

bill

w

ould

mak

e n

on

subst

anti

ve

chan

ges

to t

he

def

init

ion

s ap

plic

able

to

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n n

etw

ork

co

mp

anie

s.

Sen

ate

Rule

s

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Sp

ot

bill

rel

ated

to

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

net

wo

rk c

om

pan

ies.

SB

882

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

15/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Her

tzb

erg

D

(Dis

t 18)

Cri

mes

: p

ub

lic t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

: m

ino

rs.

Curr

ent

law

mak

es it

an in

frac

tio

n o

r a

mis

dem

ean

or

to e

vad

e th

e p

aym

ent

of

a fa

re o

n a

pub

lic t

ran

sit

syst

em, t

o m

isuse

a

tran

sfer

, p

ass,

tic

ket

, or

token

wit

h t

he

inte

nt

to e

vad

e th

e p

aym

ent

of

a fa

re, o

r to

use

a d

isco

un

t ti

cket

wit

ho

ut

auth

ori

zati

on

or

fail

to p

rese

nt,

up

on

req

ues

t fr

om

a t

ransi

t sy

stem

rep

rese

nta

tive,

acc

epta

ble

pro

of

of

elig

ibili

ty t

o u

se a

d

isco

un

t ti

cket

. T

his

bill

would

pro

hib

it t

he

min

or

fro

m b

ein

g ch

arge

d w

ith

an

in

frac

tio

n o

r a

mis

dem

ean

or

for

tho

se a

cts.

Sen

ate

Pub

lic

Saf

ety

New

-

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

hib

it m

ino

rs f

rom

b

ein

g ch

arge

d w

ith

eit

her

an

in

frac

tio

n o

r m

isd

emea

no

r fo

r a

tran

sit

fare

vio

lati

on

.

SB

901

Intr

od

uce

d:

1/

21/

2016

pd

f

htm

l

Bat

es R

(D

ist

36)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts:

Advan

ced M

itig

atio

n P

rogr

am.

Wo

uld

cre

ate

the

Ad

van

ced M

itig

atio

n P

rogr

am in

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

sport

atio

n t

o im

ple

men

t en

vir

on

men

tal

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s in

advan

ce o

f fu

ture

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

pro

ject

s. T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e dep

artm

ent

to s

et a

side

cert

ain

am

oun

ts o

f fu

ture

app

rop

riat

ion

s fo

r th

is p

urp

ose

.

Sen

ate

Pri

nt

N

ew -

R

eco

mm

end

W

atch

Pro

vid

es d

irec

tio

n t

o C

altr

ans

to

exp

and

ad

van

ced

mit

igat

ion

fo

r tr

ansp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts.

31

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

22

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

X1 1

A

men

ded

:

9/

1/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Wo

uld

cre

ate

the

Ro

ad M

ainte

nan

ce a

nd R

ehab

ilita

tio

n

Pro

gram

to

ad

dre

ss d

efer

red m

ain

ten

ance

on

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay

syst

em a

nd

th

e lo

cal st

reet

an

d r

oad

sys

tem

an

d f

or

oth

er

spec

ifie

d p

urp

ose

s. T

he

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e fo

r th

e dep

osi

t o

f var

ious

fun

ds

for

the

pro

gram

in

th

e R

oad

Mai

nte

nan

ce a

nd

Reh

abili

tati

on

Acc

oun

t, w

hic

h t

he

bill

wo

uld

cre

ate

in t

he

Sta

te T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Fund.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s Sup

po

rt a

nd

See

k

Am

end

men

ts

Lat

est

amen

dm

ents

ref

lect

a m

ajo

r n

ew s

tate

/lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

fun

din

g b

ill. I

t w

ould

pro

vid

e $3

-4

bill

ion

+, an

nual

ly, fo

r 5 y

ears

, to

fu

nd

sta

te a

nd

lo

cal ro

ad r

epai

r.

Rai

ses

gas

tax

.10 c

ents

per

gal

., d

iese

l .1

2 c

ents

per

gal

., V

RF

by

$70.

Bill

is

sim

ilar

but

no

t id

enti

cal to

SB

16 (

Bea

ll).

SB

X1 2

In

tro

duce

d:

6/

30/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Huff

R

(Dis

t 29)

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d.

Wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at t

ho

se a

nn

ual

pro

ceed

s sh

all b

e ap

pro

pri

ated

by

the

Leg

isla

ture

fo

r tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

infr

astr

uct

ure

, in

cludin

g public

str

eets

an

d h

igh

way

s, b

ut

excl

ud

ing

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

T

ransp

ort

atio

n

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

D

evel

op

men

t

Op

pose

T

he

bill

see

ks

to t

ransf

er f

rom

cu

rren

t ca

p a

nd

tra

de

per

man

ent

allo

cati

on

s fo

r H

igh

Sp

eed

Rai

l, ra

il an

d t

ran

sit

pro

gram

s th

e am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ues

att

rib

uta

ble

to

th

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

uel

s se

cto

r an

d m

ake

them

avai

lab

le f

or

pub

lic s

tree

ts a

nd

h

igh

way

s.

Th

e fu

els

sect

or

is e

stim

ated

to

p

rovid

e an

am

oun

t o

f au

ctio

n

reven

ues

est

imat

ed t

o b

e eq

ual

to

a

fuel

tax

of

10 c

ents

per

gal

lon

.

Th

e ef

fect

of

this

wo

uld

be

to g

reat

ly

red

uce

th

e am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ues

av

aila

ble

fo

r p

rogr

ams

like

the

Tra

nsi

t In

terc

ity

Rai

l C

apit

al p

rogr

am

in w

hic

h S

FM

TA

was

succ

essf

ul in

co

mp

etin

g, r

ecei

vin

g $4

1 m

illio

n f

or

its

Lig

ht

Rai

l V

ehic

le E

xpan

sio

n

pro

ject

.

32

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

23

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

X1 3

A

men

ded

:

8/

17/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Vid

ak R

(D

ist

14)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n b

on

ds:

hig

hw

ay, st

reet

, an

d r

oad

pro

ject

s.

Wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at n

o f

urt

her

bo

nds

shal

l b

e so

ld f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail p

urp

ose

s p

urs

uan

t to

th

e Saf

e, R

elia

ble

H

igh

-Sp

eed

Pas

sen

ger

Tra

in B

on

d A

ct f

or

the

21s

t C

entu

ry,

exce

pt

as s

pec

ific

ally

pro

vid

ed w

ith

res

pec

t to

an

exi

stin

g ap

pro

pri

atio

n f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail p

urp

ose

s fo

r ea

rly

imp

rovem

ent

pro

ject

s in

th

e P

has

e 1 b

len

ded

sys

tem

. The

bill

, su

bje

ct t

o t

he

abo

ve

exce

pti

on

, w

ould

req

uir

e re

dir

ecti

on

of

the

un

spen

t p

roce

eds

fro

m o

uts

tandin

g b

on

ds

issu

ed a

nd s

old

fo

r o

ther

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail p

urp

ose

s p

rior

to t

he

effe

ctiv

e dat

e o

f th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s, u

po

n a

ppro

pri

atio

n, fo

r use

in

ret

irin

g th

e d

ebt

incu

rred

fro

m t

he

issu

ance

an

d s

ale

of

tho

se o

uts

tan

din

g b

on

ds.

Sen

ate

Op

pose

P

roh

ibit

s n

ew b

on

d s

ales

fo

r H

igh

Sp

eed

Rai

l, ex

cep

t fo

r fu

nd

ing

of

bo

oken

d p

roje

cts

and

Co

nn

ecti

vit

y P

rogr

am p

roje

cts.

Furt

her

, unsp

ent

bo

nds

alre

ady

sold

w

ould

be

use

d t

o r

etir

e ex

isti

ng

Pro

p

1A

hig

h s

pee

d b

on

d d

ebt.

Th

e ef

fect

of

this

bill

wo

uld

be

to

hal

t th

e H

igh

Sp

eed

Rai

l pro

ject

, ev

en t

ho

ugh

des

irab

le r

egio

nal

p

roje

cts

wo

uld

be

left

un

touch

ed.

SB

X1 4

A

men

ded

:

9/

4/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n t

o

imp

rove

and

mai

nta

in t

he

stat

e's

hig

hw

ays,

an

d e

stab

lish

es

var

ious

pro

gram

s to

fund t

he

dev

elo

pm

ent,

co

nst

ruct

ion

, an

d

rep

air

of

loca

l ro

ads,

bri

dge

s, a

nd o

ther

cri

tica

l tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

infr

astr

uct

ure

in

th

e st

ate.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

dec

lare

th

e in

ten

t o

f th

e L

egis

latu

re t

o e

nac

t st

atuto

ry c

han

ges

to e

stab

lish

p

erm

anen

t, s

ust

ain

able

so

urc

es o

f tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g to

m

ain

tain

an

d r

epai

r th

e st

ate'

s h

igh

way

s, lo

cal ro

ads,

bri

dge

s,

and

oth

er c

riti

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

.

Sen

ate

C

on

fere

nce

C

om

mit

tee

Wat

ch

Th

is is

a sp

ot

bill

in

ten

ded

to

ser

ve

as

a veh

icle

fo

r a

tran

spo

rtat

ion f

un

din

g re

solu

tio

n, sh

ould

on

e b

e re

ach

ed in

Sp

ecia

l Ses

sio

n.

SB

X1 5

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

7/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bea

ll D

(D

ist

15)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

est

ablis

hes

var

ious

pro

gram

s to

fun

d t

he

dev

elo

pm

ent,

co

nst

ruct

ion

, an

d r

epai

r of

loca

l ro

ads,

bri

dge

s,

and

oth

er c

riti

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

in t

he

stat

e.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

dec

lare

th

e in

ten

t o

f th

e L

egis

latu

re t

o e

nac

t le

gisl

atio

n t

o e

stab

lish

per

man

ent,

sust

ain

able

sourc

es o

f tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g to

im

pro

ve

the

stat

e's

key

tra

de

corr

idors

an

d s

upp

ort

eff

ort

s b

y lo

cal go

ver

nm

ents

to

rep

air

and

im

pro

ve

loca

l tr

ansp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

.

Ass

emb

ly D

esk

Wat

ch

Sp

ecia

l se

ssio

n s

po

t b

ill in

ten

ded

to

se

rve

as a

veh

icle

for

a tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

fun

din

g re

solu

tio

n, sh

ould

on

e b

e re

ach

ed in

Sp

ecia

l Ses

sion

.

33

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

24

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

X1 6

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

13/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Run

ner

R

(Dis

t 21)

Gre

enh

ouse

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d: tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

exp

end

iture

s.

Wo

uld

del

ete

the

con

tin

uo

us

app

rop

riat

ion

s fr

om

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d f

or

the

hig

h-s

pee

d r

ail

pro

ject

, an

d w

ould

pro

hib

it a

ny

of

the

pro

ceed

s fr

om

th

e fu

nd

fro

m b

ein

g use

d f

or

that

pro

ject

. T

he

bill

wo

uld

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

the

rem

ain

ing

65%

of

ann

ual

pro

ceed

s o

f th

e fu

nd

to t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n f

or

allo

cati

on

to

h

igh

-pri

ori

ty t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s, a

s det

erm

ined

by

the

com

mis

sio

n, w

ith

40%

of

tho

se m

on

eys

to b

e al

loca

ted t

o

stat

e h

igh

way

pro

ject

s, 4

0% t

o lo

cal st

reet

an

d r

oad

pro

ject

s d

ivid

ed e

qual

ly b

etw

een

cit

ies

and c

ounti

es, an

d 2

0% t

o p

ub

lic

tran

sit

pro

ject

s.

Sen

ate

O

pp

ose

R

edir

ects

cap

an

d t

rad

e fu

nds

fro

m

hig

h s

pee

d r

ail an

d o

ther

tra

nsi

t p

rogr

ams

to t

he

CT

C f

or

stat

e h

igh

way

s an

d lo

cal ro

ads.

SB

X1 7

A

men

ded

:

9/

3/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Alle

n D

(D

ist

26)

Die

sel sa

les

and

use

tax

. W

ould

res

tric

t ex

pen

dit

ure

s o

f re

ven

ues

fro

m t

he

July

1, 2

016,

incr

ease

in

th

e sa

les

and u

se t

ax o

n d

iese

l fu

el t

o t

ran

sit

cap

ital

p

urp

ose

s an

d c

erta

in t

ran

sit

serv

ices

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e an

ex

isti

ng

requir

ed a

udit

of

tran

sit

op

erat

or

fin

ance

s to

ver

ify

that

th

ese

new

rev

enues

hav

e b

een

exp

ended

in

co

nfo

rman

ce

wit

h t

hes

e sp

ecif

ic r

estr

icti

on

s an

d a

ll o

ther

gen

eral

ly

app

licab

le r

equir

emen

ts. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s

Sup

po

rt

Th

e b

ill s

eeks

to in

crea

se t

ran

sit

fun

ds

by

incr

easi

ng

the

die

sel sa

les

tax

rate

. B

ill is

the

sam

e as

AB

X1 8

(C

hiu

).

SB

X1 8

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Hill

D

(Dis

t 13)

Pub

lic t

ran

sit:

fun

din

g.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es a

ll m

on

eys,

exc

ept

for

fin

es a

nd p

enal

ties

, co

llect

ed b

y th

e Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d f

rom

th

e au

ctio

n o

r sa

le o

f al

low

ance

s as

par

t o

f a

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m r

elat

ive

to r

educt

ion

of

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

on

s to

be

dep

osi

ted

in

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d. T

his

b

ill w

ould

inst

ead

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

20%

of

tho

se

ann

ual

pro

ceed

s to

th

e T

ransi

t an

d I

nte

rcit

y R

ail C

apit

al

Pro

gram

, an

d 1

0%

of

tho

se a

nn

ual

pro

ceed

s to

th

e L

ow

C

arb

on

Tra

nsi

t O

per

atio

ns

Pro

gram

, th

ereb

y m

akin

g an

ap

pro

pri

atio

n. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er c

urr

ent

law

s.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s Sup

po

rt

Th

e b

ill w

ould

in

crea

se c

ap a

nd

tra

de

fun

din

g d

edic

ated

to

(1)t

ransi

t ca

pit

ol

(2)

tran

sit

op

erat

ion

. B

ill is

the

sam

e as

AB

X1 7

(N

azar

ian

).

34

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

25

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

X1 9

In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Mo

orl

ach

R

(Dis

t 37)

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n.

Curr

ent

law

cre

ates

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n w

ith

var

ious

po

wer

s an

d d

uti

es r

elat

ive

to t

he

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

an

d o

ther

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n p

rogr

ams.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

hib

it

the

dep

artm

ent

fro

m u

sin

g an

y n

on

recu

rrin

g fu

nds,

in

cludin

g,

but

no

t lim

ited

to

, lo

an r

epay

men

ts, b

on

d f

un

ds,

or

gran

t fu

nd

s, t

o p

ay t

he

sala

ries

or

ben

efit

s o

f an

y p

erm

anen

t ci

vil

serv

ice

po

siti

on

wit

hin

th

e dep

artm

ent.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

re

late

d p

rovis

ion

s an

d o

ther

curr

ent

law

s.

Sen

ate

W

atch

T

he

mo

st p

rom

inen

t el

emen

t o

f th

is

bill

wo

uld

be

to m

and

ate

that

C

altr

ans

con

trac

t w

ith

qual

ifie

d

pri

vat

e en

titi

es f

or

arch

itec

tura

l an

d

engi

nee

rin

g se

rvic

es f

or

a m

inim

um

o

f 50%

of

the

tota

l an

nual

val

ue

of

thes

e se

rvic

es w

ith

res

pec

t to

pub

lic

wo

rks

of

impro

vem

ents

un

der

taken

b

y C

altr

ans.

SB

X1 1

0 In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Bat

es R

(D

ist

36)

Reg

ion

al t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

cap

ital

im

pro

vem

ent

fun

ds.

C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es f

un

ds

avai

lab

le f

or

regi

on

al p

roje

cts

to b

e p

rogr

amm

ed b

y th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

p

urs

uan

t to

th

e co

un

ty s

har

es f

orm

ula

, un

der

wh

ich

a c

erta

in

amo

un

t o

f fu

nd

ing

is a

vai

lab

le f

or

pro

gram

min

g in

eac

h

coun

ty, b

ased

on

po

pula

tio

n a

nd m

iles

of

stat

e h

igh

way

. C

urr

ent

law

sp

ecif

ies

the

var

ious

typ

es o

f p

roje

cts

that

may

be

fun

ded

wit

h t

he

regi

on

al s

har

e o

f fu

nds

to in

clude

stat

e h

igh

way

s, lo

cal ro

ads,

tra

nsi

t, a

nd o

ther

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

re

vis

e th

e p

roce

ss f

or

pro

gram

min

g an

d a

lloca

tin

g th

e 75%

sh

are

of

stat

e an

d f

eder

al f

un

ds

avai

lab

le f

or

regi

on

al

tran

spo

rtat

ion

im

pro

vem

ent

pro

ject

s.

Sen

ate

T

ransp

ort

atio

n

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

D

evel

op

men

t

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill w

ould

tra

nsf

er r

egio

nal

Sta

te

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n I

mp

rovem

ent

Pro

gram

(ST

IP)

fun

ds

dir

ectl

y to

M

etro

po

litan

Pla

nn

ing

Org

aniz

atio

ns

(MP

Os)

for

allo

cati

on

to

coun

ty

pro

ject

s.

SB

X1 1

1 A

men

ded

:

9/

4/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Ber

ryh

ill R

(D

ist

8)

En

vir

on

men

tal qual

ity:

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n in

fras

truct

ure

. T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

En

vir

onm

enta

l Q

ual

ity

Act

(C

EQ

A)

requir

es a

le

ad a

gen

cy, as

def

ined

, to

pre

par

e, o

r ca

use

to

be

pre

par

ed,

and

cer

tify

th

e co

mp

leti

on

of,

an

en

vir

onm

enta

l im

pac

t re

po

rt

(EIR

) o

n a

pro

ject

th

at it

pro

po

ses

to c

arry

out

or

app

rove

that

may

hav

e a

sign

ific

ant

effe

ct o

n t

he

envir

on

men

t o

r to

ad

op

t a

neg

ativ

e d

ecla

rati

on

if

it f

inds

that

th

e p

roje

ct w

ill n

ot

hav

e th

at e

ffec

t. T

his

bill

would

exe

mp

t fr

om

th

ese

CE

QA

p

rovis

ion

s a

pro

ject

th

at c

on

sist

s of

the

insp

ecti

on

, m

ain

ten

ance

, re

pai

r, r

esto

rati

on

, re

con

dit

ion

ing,

rel

oca

tio

n,

rep

lace

men

t, o

r re

mo

val

of

exis

tin

g tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

infr

astr

uct

ure

if

cert

ain

co

ndit

ion

s ar

e m

et, an

d w

ould

req

uir

e th

e p

erso

n u

nd

erta

kin

g th

ese

pro

ject

s to

tak

e ce

rtai

n a

ctio

ns.

Sen

ate

T

ransp

ort

atio

n

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

D

evel

op

men

t

Wat

ch

Bro

aden

s cu

rren

t la

w t

o p

rovid

e C

EQ

A e

xem

pti

on

fo

r sa

fety

an

d

rep

airs

on

ro

adw

ays

that

is

wit

hin

th

e ro

ad "

foo

tpri

nt"

.

35

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

26

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

X1 1

2 A

men

ded

:

8/

20/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Run

ner

R

(Dis

t 21)

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n (

CT

C).

W

ould

exc

lud

e th

e C

TC

fro

m t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy,

esta

blis

h it

as a

n e

nti

ty in

sta

te g

over

nm

ent, a

nd r

equir

e it

to

ac

t in

an

in

dep

end

ent

over

sigh

t ro

le. T

he

bill

wo

uld

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

chan

ges.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s W

atch

R

e-es

tab

lish

es in

dep

end

ence

of

CT

C

fro

m t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy.

SB

X1 1

3 A

men

ded

:

9/

3/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Vid

ak R

(D

ist

14)

Off

ice

of

the

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n I

nsp

ecto

r G

ener

al.

Wo

uld

cre

ate

the

Off

ice

of

the

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n I

nsp

ecto

r G

ener

al in

sta

te g

over

nm

ent,

as

an in

dep

enden

t o

ffic

e th

at

wo

uld

no

t b

e a

sub

div

isio

n o

f an

y o

ther

go

ver

nm

ent

enti

ty, to

b

uild

cap

acit

y fo

r se

lf-c

orr

ecti

on

in

to t

he

gover

nm

ent

itse

lf

and

to

en

sure

th

at a

ll st

ate

agen

cies

exp

endin

g st

ate

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fun

ds

are

op

erat

ing

effi

cien

tly,

eff

ecti

vel

y, a

nd

in c

om

plia

nce

wit

h f

eder

al a

nd s

tate

law

s.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s

Wat

ch

Cre

ates

a n

ew I

nsp

ecto

r G

ener

al

off

ice

to o

ver

see

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

Cal

tran

s an

d H

igh

Sp

eed

Rai

l A

uth

ori

ty.

SB

X1 1

4 In

tro

duce

d:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Can

nel

la R

(D

ist

12)

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts:

com

pre

hen

sive

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e ag

reem

ents

. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

nd

regi

on

al t

ransp

ort

atio

n a

genci

es, as

def

ined

, to

en

ter

into

co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e ag

reem

ents

wit

h p

ub

lic a

nd

pri

vat

e en

titi

es, o

r co

nso

rtia

of

tho

se e

nti

ties

, fo

r ce

rtai

n

tran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s th

at m

ay c

har

ge c

erta

in u

sers

of

tho

se

pro

ject

s to

lls a

nd

use

r fe

es, s

ub

ject

to

var

ious

term

s an

d

requir

emen

ts. T

his

bill

wo

uld

ext

end t

his

auth

ori

zati

on

in

def

init

ely

and

wo

uld

in

clude

wit

hin

th

e def

init

ion

of

"reg

ion

al t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

" th

e San

ta C

lara

Val

ley

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

uth

ori

ty, th

ereb

y au

tho

rizi

ng

the

auth

ori

ty t

o

ente

r in

to p

ub

lic-p

rivat

e p

artn

ersh

ips

under

th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s.

Sen

ate

T

ransp

ort

atio

n

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

D

evel

op

men

t

Wat

ch

E

xten

ds

curr

ent

pub

lic-p

rivat

e p

artn

ersh

ip law

in

def

init

ely.

SC

A 5

A

men

ded

:

7/

16/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Han

cock

D

(Dis

t 9)

Lo

cal go

ver

nm

ent

fin

ance

. W

ould

exe

mp

t fr

om

tax

atio

n f

or

each

tax

pay

er a

n a

mo

un

t up

to

$500,0

00 o

f ta

ngi

ble

per

son

al p

rop

erty

use

d f

or

busi

nes

s p

urp

ose

s. T

his

mea

sure

wo

uld

pro

hib

it t

he

Leg

isla

ture

fro

m

low

erin

g th

is e

xem

pti

on

am

oun

t o

r fr

om

ch

angi

ng

its

app

licat

ion

, b

ut

wo

uld

auth

ori

ze it

to b

e in

crea

sed c

on

sist

ent

wit

h t

he

auth

ori

ty d

escr

ibed

ab

ove.

Th

is m

easu

re w

ould

p

rovid

e th

at t

his

pro

vis

ion

sh

all b

eco

me

op

erat

ive

on

Jan

uar

y 1, 2019. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ion

s an

d o

ther

ex

isti

ng

law

s.

Sen

ate

G

over

nan

ce

and F

inan

ce

Sup

po

rt

Wo

uld

sp

ecif

y th

at t

he

vote

r ap

pro

val

req

uir

emen

t is

55%

for

loca

l go

ver

nm

ent

spec

ial ta

xes.

36

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Feb

ruary

2016

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\SFC

TA M

atr

ix 2

-17

-16

.rtf

27

of

27

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SC

AX

1 1

In

tro

duce

d:

6/

19/

2015

pd

f

htm

l

Huff

R

(Dis

t 29)

Mo

tor

veh

icle

fee

s an

d t

axes

: re

stri

ctio

n o

n e

xpen

dit

ure

s.

Wo

uld

pro

hib

it t

he

Leg

isla

ture

fro

m b

orr

ow

ing

reven

ues

fro

m

fees

an

d t

axes

im

po

sed b

y th

e st

ate

on

veh

icle

s o

r th

eir

use

or

op

erat

ion

, an

d f

rom

usi

ng

tho

se r

even

ues

oth

er t

han

as

spec

ific

ally

per

mit

ted

by

Art

icle

XIX

. T

he

mea

sure

wo

uld

als

o

pro

hib

it t

ho

se r

even

ues

fro

m b

ein

g p

ledge

d o

r use

d f

or

the

pay

men

t o

f p

rin

cip

al a

nd inte

rest

on

bo

nds

or

oth

er

ind

ebte

dn

ess.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Sen

ate

A

pp

rop

riat

ion

s

Sup

po

rt

Inte

nd

ed t

o p

rote

ct n

ew r

even

ues

ge

ner

ated

by

new

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

taxe

s o

r fe

es.

To

tal

Measu

res:

72

To

tal

Tra

ckin

g F

orm

s: 7

2

37

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

38

02.18.16 RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

February 24, 2016

Citizens Advisory Committee

Anna LaForte – Deputy Director for Policy and Programming

– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Approval of the 2016 Prop AA Call for Projects Programming Recommendations Totaling $2,192,934 for Five Projects and Amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan

Prop AA generates revenues from a $10 vehicle registration fee on motor vehicles registered in San Francisco to fund transportation improvements consistent with a 2012 voter-approved expenditure plan. One of the features of Prop AA is a focus on quick-to-deliver projects that bring tangible benefits to neighborhoods citywide. Correspondingly, the 2012 Strategic Plan policies allow for periodic calls for projects to reprogram cost savings or funds from programmed projects that failed to request funds in a timely manner. In November we issued a call for projects to program $1,193,197 in Prop AA revenues available mainly from cost savings from recently completed projects. By the January 13, 2016 deadline we received five applications requesting about $2.6 million in Prop AA funds. In order to fund more projects, we updated the Prop AA revenue assumptions for the first five years of the Strategic Plan (Fiscal Years 2012/13–2016/17) based on actual revenues collected to date, which are about 3.9% higher than was assumed in the Strategic Plan. Revising the revenue estimates, after netting out 5% program administration costs, increases the capital reserve by $999,737, which is now available for programming. We evaluated projects using the Board-adopted screening and prioritization criteria. Our recommendation is to program $2,192,934 in Prop AA funds (comprised of $1,193,197 in cost savings and $999,737 from the capital reserve) to fully fund 3 projects and partially fund 1 project (Attachment 3). This includes full funding for San Francisco Public Works’ construction requests for Broadway Chinatown ($1,029,839) and Mansell ($163,358) streetscape improvement projects, which are both One Bay Area Grant projects with funding shortfalls; and $507,980 for construction of a Muni bus layover area at the BART Daly City Station to accommodate planned service increases for the 14R-Mission Rapid route; and partial funding ($491,757) of the design phase of SFMTA’s Bulb-outs at WalkFirst Locations project which would upgrade up to 25 existing painted safety zones with concrete bulb-outs on pedestrian high injury corridors throughout the city. Our recommendation holds the capital reserve at $240,000 (about 5% of annual revenues), as approved by the Board in May 2014.

San Francisco voters approved Proposition AA (Prop AA) on November 2, 2010. Prop AA uses revenues collected from an additional $10 vehicle registration fee on motor vehicles registered in San Francisco for local road repairs, pedestrian safety improvements, and transit reliability and mobility improvements throughout the city consistent with the Prop AA Expenditure Plan. Given its small size – less than $5 million in annual revenues – one of Prop AA’s guiding principles is to focus on small, high-impact projects that will provide tangible benefits to the public in the short-term. Thus, Prop AA only funds design and

39

construction phases of projects and places a strong emphasis on timely use of funds.

In 2012 the Transportation Authority approved the first Prop AA Strategic Plan, which included programming of $26.4 million in Prop AA funds for 19 projects in the first five years of Prop AA (Fiscal Years 2012/13 to 2016/17). We are pleased to report that allocations are on-track with the Strategic Plan: to date approximately $21 million in Prop AA funds have been allocated and most of the projects eligible for funds through Fiscal Year 2015/16 have received allocations.

By fall 2015, we had confirmed that six projects in the Strategic Plan would not need the full amount of Prop AA funds to reach completion, resulting in $1.193 million available for programming to new projects. Consistent with Prop AA policies to deliver tangible benefits quickly to neighborhoods citywide, we issued a competitive call for projects in November 2015.

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the 2016 Prop AA call for projects draft programming recommendations to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), and to seek a motion of support for the approval of these recommendations and a corresponding amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan.

On November 25, 2015, we issued a call for projects to program $1,193,197 in Prop AA vehicle registration fee revenues available primarily from cost savings from recently completed projects, largely from the Pedestrian Safety and Transit Reliability and Mobility categories ($680,800 and $507,980, respectively). By the January 13, 2016 deadline we had received five applications requesting approximately $2.6 million in Prop AA funds. Attachment 1 summarizes the applications received. Additional detail is provided in the project information forms included in the enclosure.

The call for projects was based on just over $1.1 million in Prop AA funds available from costs savings and other un-needed funds as detailed in Table 1 on the next page. Given that the call for projects generated requests for more than twice that amount of funds and that we are in the last year of the 5-years of programming included in the 2012 Prop K Strategic Plan, we decided to revisit revenue assumptions to see if more funds could be available to program at this time.

Prop AA revenue collection began in May 2011. The 2012 Strategic Plan was the first one ever adopted for Prop AA. As shown in Attachment 2, at the time, Prop AA revenues were projected to average $387,000 per month, or about $4.64 million annually, based on the number of vehicles registered in San Francisco – a number which was expected to remain relatively flat over time. Based on actual revenues collected between March 2011 and November 2015, we are revising our revenue assumptions by about 3.9% to $402,800 per month or about $4.83 million annually. The Strategic Plan programs funds to projects in the 5-year period spanning Fiscal Years 2012/13 to 2016/17. Over that 5-year, the revised revenue assumptions makes an additional $1,052,355 million available.

40

Table 1. Funds Available for Reprogramming (e.g. cost savings, unneeded funds)

Project (Phase) Amount

Prop AA Expenditure Plan

Category

Reason Funds Available

Franklin and Divisadero Signal Upgrades (Design)

$564,730 Pedestrian Safety

Project costs were lower than anticipated due to efficiencies realized from best practices based on prior, similar projects. Design phase also benefitted from coordination with San Francisco Public Work's repaving project along the same corridor.

24th Street/Mission BART SW Plaza and Pedestrian Improvements (Construction)

$503,980 Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvements

Costs were lower than anticipated because of a favorable bid environment.

Franklin Street Pedestrian Signals (Design and Construction)

$88,520 Pedestrian Safety Cost savings. Combined with Franklin and Divisadero project. See above.

Ellis/Eddy Traffic Calming (Design) $27,550 Pedestrian Safety Project funded via Prop K.

28th Avenue Pavement Renovation (Construction)

$4,417 Street Repair and Reconstruction

Project costs were lower than anticipated. Project completed under budget.

City College Pedestrian Connector (Construction)

$4,000 Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvements

Funds not needed. Project budget lower than anticipated at programming.

Total Funds Available $1,193,197

The table below details how the revised revenue assumptions result in increased capital reserve funds that could be available for programming to new projects now or programmed as part of next year’s Strategic Plan update. It should be noted that Prop AA is a pay as you go program so the capital reserve is helpful as a buffer against fluctuations in revenues.

Table 2. Increased Prop AA Capital Reserve

Revised estimated revenues (Fiscal Year 2010/11 – Fiscal Year 2016/17) $29,696,044

Funds programmed in the 2012 Strategic Plan ($26,658,463)

5% Program administration costs (including one-time startup costs*) ($1,797,845)

Existing Capital Reserve (~5% of annual revenue) ($240,000)

Increased Capital Reserve – currently available for programming ($999,737)

*One-time startup costs of $314,000.

41

We developed the draft programming recommendations based upon the project information submitted in response to the Prop AA call for projects, application of the Board-adopted prioritization criteria, and follow-up communications with sponsors to clarify and seek additional project information as needed. We first screened project submissions for eligibility and determined that all six projects were eligible for Prop AA funding. We then evaluated the projects using program-wide prioritization criteria (such as project readiness, community support, and construction coordination opportunities) and category specific criteria (such as whether projects seeking funds from the Pedestrian Safety category are located on a WalkFirst corridor or directly improve access to transit or schools). Descriptions of the evaluation criteria and the resulting project scores are detailed in the Project Evaluation table in the enclosure with one table for the Pedestrian Safety category and a second table for the Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvement category. For the latter category, we also took into consideration the special condition included in the Prop AA Strategic Plan that gives priority to San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)’s Rapid Network projects for receiving any Prop AA funds in the Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvements category that arise from cost savings, cancelled projects, etc. – provided that they meet all other requirements in the call for projects, including project readiness standards.

Attachment 3 shows our draft programming recommendations along with the evaluation score for each project as reference. Our recommendation is to program $2,192,934 in Prop AA funds (comprised of $1,193,197 in cost savings and $999,737 from the capital reserve) to fully fund 3 projects and partially fund 1 project. Only the lowest scoring project is not recommended for any funding. This includes full funding for San Francisco Public Works’ construction requests for Broadway Chinatown ($1,029,839) and Mansell ($163,358) streetscape improvement projects, which are both One Bay Area Grant projects with funding shortfalls; and $507,980 for construction of a Muni bus layover area at the BART Daly City Station to accommodate planned service increases for the 14R-Mission Rapid route; and partial funding ($491,757) of the design phase of SFMTA’s Bulb-outs at WalkFirst Locations project which would upgrade up to 25 existing painted safety zones with concrete bulb-outs on pedestrian high injury corridors throughout the city. The SFMTA is able to scale the number of locations to be designed based on the amount of funds available. Our recommendation holds the capital reserve at $240,000 (about 5% of annual revenues), as approved by the Board in May 2014.

We are not recommending funding for the Presidio Trust’s Greenwich Gate project, which would create a new 12-foot gate for pedestrians and cyclists at the Presidio boundary wall at the intersection of Greenwich and Lyon Streets, and a multi-use trail to connect the new gate at the intersection of Lombard and Letterman Streets. The primary reasons are related to project readiness and lack of additional funding after funding higher scoring projects. The project is at 10 percent design, and will need additional public outreach prior to advancing into the final design and construction phases, which are the eligible phases for Prop AA funding.

The recommended draft programming for these projects would require an amendment to the Prop AA Strategic Plan to program $999,737 from the increased Prop AA capital reserve (as described above) in addition to the funds available from recently completed projects ($1,193,197); and to add the four new recommended projects with $2,192,934 in Prop AA funds. Attachment 4 shows the proposed amendment Strategic Plan programming.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the approval of the 2016 Prop AA call for projects programming recommendations and amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan, as requested.

42

2. Adopt a motion of support for the approval of the 2016 Prop AA call for projects programming

recommendations and amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan, with modifications.

3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis.

Approval of the programming recommendations and Strategic Plan amendment does not allocate any funds to projects. Allocation approvals are the subject of separate actions by the Transportation Authority Board. Sufficient funds are included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2015/16 budget to accommodate the recommended cash flows should the Transportation Authority Board approve the Prop AA Strategic Plan amendment and subsequent allocation requests.

Adopt a motion of support for the approval of the 2016 Prop AA call for projects programming recommendations and amendment of the Prop AA Strategic Plan.

Attachments (4): 1. Prop AA Summary of Project Submissions 2. Prop AA Revised Revenue Projections 3. Prop AA Draft Programming Recommendations 4. Proposed Amended Prop AA Strategic Plan

Enclosure:

1. Prop AA Project Evaluation and Project Information Forms (6 documents total)

43

Atta

chm

ent 1

.Pr

op A

A Su

mm

ary

of P

roje

ct S

ubm

issi

ons

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

Cat

egor

y.

Num

ber

Proj

ect N

ame

Brie

f Pro

ject

Des

crip

tion

Spon

sor2

Phas

e(s)

Tot

al P

roje

ct

Cos

tPr

op A

A R

eque

sted

Firs

t Fi

scal

Ye

arD

istri

ct(s

)N

otes

1G

reen

wich

Gat

e

The

proj

ect w

ould

recr

eate

an

hist

oric

ope

ning

in th

e Pr

esid

io

boun

dary

wall

at t

he in

ters

ectio

n of

Gre

enw

ich

and

Lyon

Stre

ets,

and

crea

te a

new

nar

row

(~12

ft) g

ate

for p

edes

trian

s and

cyc

lists

. Th

e pr

ojec

t also

incl

udes

con

stru

ctio

n of

535

line

ar fe

et o

f mul

ti-us

e tra

il to

con

nect

the

Gre

enw

ich G

ate

to th

e Lo

mba

rd/L

ette

rman

in

ters

ectio

n, c

ompl

etin

g on

e of

the

two

rem

ainin

g ga

ps in

the

Pres

idio

Pro

men

ade

mul

ti-us

e tra

il. T

he p

roje

ct w

as id

entif

ied

in

Pres

idio

Tra

ils a

nd B

ikew

ays M

aste

r Plan

(Jul

y 20

03).

Pres

idio

Tr

ust

Des

ign,

Co

nstru

ctio

n $

9

05,0

97

250,

000

$

15/1

62

2Bu

lb-o

uts

at W

alkFi

rst

Loca

tions

This

proj

ect f

unds

the

desig

n ph

ase

to u

pgra

de u

p to

25

exist

ing

Pain

ted

Safe

ty Z

ones

(PSZ

) to

perm

anen

t con

cret

e bu

lb-o

uts o

n Pe

dest

rian

Hig

h In

jury

Cor

ridor

s thr

ough

out t

he c

ity. T

he S

FMTA

w

ill se

lect

the

high

est-p

riorit

y PS

Zs w

ith c

ollis

ion

patte

rns t

hat

war

rant

upg

rade

. Des

ign

wou

ld b

egin

in S

prin

g 20

16 a

nd st

art

cons

truct

ion

in S

prin

g 20

18. L

ocat

ions

wer

e id

entif

ied

thro

ugh

Walk

Firs

t plan

ning

pro

cess

.

SFM

TAD

esig

n $

6,6

00,0

00

600,

000

$

15/1

6Ci

tyw

ide

Cons

truct

ion

phas

e to

be

fund

ed w

ith S

FMTA

Rev

enue

Bo

nds.

3

Broa

dway

Ch

inat

own

Stre

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ents

This

proj

ect w

ould

mak

e im

prov

emen

ts to

Bro

adw

ay b

etw

een

Colu

mbu

s and

the

Broa

dway

Tun

nel,

incl

udin

g ne

w p

edes

trian

cr

ossin

gs; r

oadw

ay re

conf

igur

atio

n an

d re

pavi

ng; s

harr

ows t

o im

prov

e cy

clist

visi

bilit

y; an

d pe

dest

rian

amen

ities

such

as p

edes

trian

lig

htin

g, tr

ee p

lantin

g, a

nd b

us sh

elte

r and

seat

ing

impr

ovem

ents

. Pr

ojec

t inc

lude

s a fo

cus o

n sa

fety

impr

ovem

ents

aro

und

Jean

Par

ker

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool.

Caltr

ans E

nviro

nmen

tal J

ustic

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Plan

ning

gra

nt fu

nded

a c

omm

unity

eng

agem

ent p

roce

ss fo

r the

pr

ojec

t in

2011

and

201

2. C

onst

ruct

ion

is ex

pect

ed to

be

com

plet

ed

by S

prin

g 20

17.

SFPW

Cons

truct

ion

$

8

,199

,591

1,

029,

839

$

15

/16

3

Prop

AA

wou

ld le

vera

ge O

ne B

ay A

rea

Gra

nt (O

BAG

) fu

nds p

rogr

amm

ed b

y th

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y in

20

13, p

rior P

rop

AA

and

Pro

p K

allo

catio

ns, S

FMTA

Re

venu

e Bo

nds,

and

stat

e Sa

fe R

oute

s to

Scho

ol g

rant

to

fully

fund

the

proj

ect.

Proj

ect w

as o

rigin

ally

adve

rtise

d fo

r bid

in S

epte

mbe

r 201

5. O

nly

one

bid

was

rece

ived

at

30%

ove

r eng

inee

r's e

stim

ate,

whi

ch S

FPW

larg

ely

attri

bute

s to

a ve

ry c

ompe

titiv

e bi

d cl

imat

e. D

ue to

lack

of

fund

s and

inte

rest

in a

ttrac

ting

addi

tiona

l bid

ders

, SF

PW d

id n

ot a

ccep

t thi

s bid

. SFP

W h

as re

wor

ked

the

bid

pack

age

by re

duci

ng th

e W

ater

Dep

artm

ent's

scop

e an

d id

entif

ying

alte

rnat

e bi

d ite

ms s

uch

as si

dew

alk

wat

erpr

oofin

g, b

ronz

e all

eyw

ays n

ame

plaq

ues,

stre

et tr

ee

irrig

atio

n, a

nd 2

4 m

onth

s of p

lant e

stab

lishm

ent.

Add

ition

al Pr

op A

A fu

nds w

ould

fully

fund

pro

ject

sc

ope.

4M

anse

ll St

reet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

ts

The

proj

ect w

ill re

conf

igur

e M

anse

ll St

reet

thro

ugh

McC

laren

Par

k by

redu

cing

the

num

ber o

f veh

icul

ar la

nes f

rom

four

to tw

o (o

ne

lane

each

way

), se

para

ting

vehi

cular

traf

fic a

nd m

ovin

g it

to th

e so

uth

side

of th

e m

edian

bet

wee

n V

isita

cion

and

Bra

zil A

venu

es,

and

crea

ting

a m

ulti-

use

path

on

the

north

side

of t

he m

edian

. Pr

ojec

t will

pro

vide

impr

oved

con

nect

ions

bet

wee

n ad

jacen

t ne

ighb

orho

ods,

park

trail

syst

ems,

and

thre

e pu

blic

scho

ols l

ocat

ed

imm

ediat

ely a

djac

ent t

o th

e pa

rk. I

mpr

ovem

ents

wer

e pr

iorit

ized

th

roug

h pu

blic

out

reac

h in

201

0 an

d 20

13. C

onst

ruct

ion

is ex

pect

ed

to b

e co

mpl

eted

by

Sept

embe

r 201

6.

SFPW

Cons

truct

ion

$

6

,955

,141

16

3,35

8$

15

/16

9, 1

0, 1

1

Prop

AA

wou

ld le

vera

ge O

BAG

fund

s, pr

ior P

rop

AA

an

d Pr

op K

allo

catio

ns, U

rban

Gre

enin

g gr

ant,

and

Recr

eatio

n an

d Pa

rk D

epar

tmen

t (RP

D) f

unds

to fu

lly

fund

the

proj

ect.

SFPW

aw

arde

d th

e co

nstru

ctio

n co

ntra

ct in

Aug

ust 2

015

and

cons

truct

ion

is un

derw

ay.

SFPW

is re

ques

ting

addi

tiona

l Pro

p A

A fu

nds t

o co

ver

the

cost

of h

ighe

r tha

n an

ticip

ated

bid

s prim

arily

for t

he

stre

et li

ghts

bid

item

(low

bid

was

~$1

20,0

00 a

bove

the

engi

neer

's es

timat

e), l

ess R

PD b

ond

fund

s ava

ilabl

e th

an

pred

icte

d (~

$50,

000)

, and

for g

uard

rail

repa

ir th

at w

as

not i

nclu

ded

in th

e ba

se c

ontra

ct. P

rop

AA

fund

s wou

ld

repl

enish

the

cont

inge

ncy

budg

et u

sed

to a

war

d th

e co

ntra

ct.

TO

TAL

$

22

,659

,829

$

2

,043

,197

1 Pr

ojec

ts a

re n

ot li

sted

in p

riorit

y or

der.

Pro

ject

s are

sorte

d by

Spo

nsor

, the

n by

Pro

ject

Nam

e.2 Sp

onso

r abb

revi

atio

ns in

clud

e: Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Publ

ic W

orks

(SFP

W) a

nd th

e Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Age

ncy

(SFM

TA).

M:\

CAC\

Mee

tings

\Mem

os\2

016\

02 F

eb\P

rop

AA\A

TT 1

Pro

p AA

Sum

mar

y of

Pro

ject

Sub

mis

sion

sPa

ge 1

of 2

44

Atta

chm

ent 1

.Pr

op A

A Su

mm

ary

of P

roje

ct S

ubm

issi

ons

Tran

sit R

eliab

ility

and

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ent C

ateg

ory.

Num

ber

Proj

ect N

ame

Brie

f Pro

ject

Des

crip

tion

Spon

sor2

Phas

e(s)

Tot

al P

roje

ct

Cos

tPr

op A

A R

eque

sted

Firs

t Fi

scal

Ye

arD

istri

ct(s

)N

otes

1

Mun

i Bus

La

yove

r Are

a at

BA

RT D

aly C

ity

Stat

ion

This

proj

ect w

ould

con

vert

up to

30

paid

par

king

spac

es w

ithin

the

Daly

Ci

ty B

ART

par

king

lot i

nto

a ne

w b

us la

yove

r are

a to

acc

omm

odat

e pl

anne

d se

rvice

incr

ease

s on

the

Mun

i 14

Rapi

d-M

issio

n Ra

pid

rout

e. Th

e D

aly C

ity B

ART

Sta

tion

serv

es a

s the

term

inal

of th

e M

uni 1

4R.

Due

to e

xist

ing

spac

e co

nstra

ints

, Mun

i bus

es a

re d

irect

ed to

layo

ver

outs

ide

the

stat

ion

on D

e Lo

ng S

treet

. In

Sprin

g 20

16, s

ervi

ce w

ill

incr

ease

from

wee

kday

pea

k-on

ly to

all

day

wee

kday

and

wee

kend

se

rvice

, res

ultin

g in

950

add

ition

al pa

ssen

gers

per

day

. Pro

ject w

ould

be

com

plet

ed b

y D

ecem

ber 2

016.

Los

s of B

ART

par

king

reve

nue

wou

ld b

e of

fset

by

incr

ease

d fa

re re

venu

e as

socia

ted

with

the

addi

tiona

l trip

s on

the

Mun

i 14R

.

BART

Cons

truct

ion

$

550

,000

55

0,00

0$

15

/16

N/A

Lette

r of s

uppo

rt re

ceiv

ed fr

om th

e SF

MTA

.

TO

TAL

550,

000

$

550,

000

$

1 Pr

ojec

ts a

re n

ot li

sted

in p

riorit

y or

der.

Pro

jects

are

sor

ted

by S

pons

or, t

hen

by P

rojec

t Nam

e.2 Sp

onso

r abb

revi

atio

ns in

clude

: Bay

Are

a Ra

pid

Tran

sit D

istric

t (BA

RT)

M:\

CAC\

Mee

ting

s\M

emos

\201

6\02

Feb

\Pro

p AA

\ATT

1 P

rop

AA S

umm

ary

of P

roje

ct S

ubm

issi

ons

Page

2 o

f 245

Atta

chm

ent 2

.Pr

op A

A R

evis

ed R

even

ue P

roje

ctio

ns

2012

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

Proj

ectio

nsTo

tal:

$28,

643,

689

Revi

sed

Reve

nue

Proj

ectio

nsTo

tal:

$29,

696,

044

$-

$1,

000,

000

$2,

000,

000

$3,

000,

000

$4,

000,

000

$5,

000,

000

$6,

000,

000

FY10

/11

FY11

/12

FY12

/13

FY13

/14

FY14

/15

FY15

/16

FY16

/17

*Rev

ised

reve

nue

proj

ectio

ns ar

e ba

sed

on ac

tual

reve

nues

col

lecte

dM

arch

201

1 to

Nov

embe

r 201

5, p

rojec

ted

thro

ugh

June

201

7

2012

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

Proj

ectio

nsRe

vise

d Re

venu

e Pr

ojec

tions

Diff

eren

ceFY

10/1

169

1,75

3$

691,

753

$

-$

FY

11/1

24,

828,

356

$

4,86

1,54

8$

33,1

93$

FY

12/1

34,

624,

716

$

4,72

4,40

8$

99,6

92$

FY

13/1

44,

624,

716

$

4,88

1,66

8$

256,

952

$

FY

14/1

54,

624,

716

$

4,86

2,06

3$

237,

347

$

FY

15/1

64,

624,

716

$

4,84

0,55

5$

215,

839

$

FY

16/1

74,

624,

716

$

4,83

4,04

9$

209,

333

$

To

tal

28,6

43,6

89$

29,6

96,0

44$

1,0

52,3

55$

Prop

AA

Rev

enue

Ass

umpt

ions

*

46

Atta

chm

ent 3

.20

16 P

rop

AA C

all f

or P

roje

cts

Dra

ft Pr

ogra

mm

ing

Rec

omm

enda

tions

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

Cat

egor

y.

Eva

luat

ion

Scor

e1Pr

ojec

t Nam

eSp

onso

r2Ph

ase(

s)T

otal

Pro

ject

C

ost

Prop

AA

Req

uest

edR

ecom

men

ded

Prop

AA

Pro

gram

min

gN

otes

15

Broa

dway

Ch

inat

own

Stre

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ents

SFPW

Cons

truct

ion

$

8,1

99,5

91

1,02

9,83

9$

1,02

9,83

9$

Cons

truct

ion

cont

ract

read

y to

re-a

dver

tise.

Prop

AA

wou

ld le

vera

ge O

ne B

ay A

rea G

rant

(O

BAG

) fun

ds p

rogr

amm

ed b

y th

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y in

201

3, p

rior P

rop

AA

and

Pr

op K

allo

catio

ns, S

FMTA

Rev

enue

Bon

ds, a

nd a

stat

e Sa

fe R

oute

s to

Scho

ol g

rant

to

fully

fund

the

proj

ect.

12M

anse

ll St

reet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

tsSF

PWCo

nstru

ctio

n $

6

,955

,141

16

3,35

8$

16

3,35

8$

Proj

ect i

s und

er c

onst

ruct

ion.

Pro

p A

A w

ould

leve

rage

OBA

G, p

rior P

rop

AA

and

Pro

p K

allo

catio

ns, U

rban

Gre

enin

g gr

ant,

and

Rec

Park

fund

s to

fully

fund

the

proj

ect.

12Bu

lb-o

uts

at W

alkFi

rst 

Loca

tions

SFM

TAD

esig

n $

6

,600

,000

60

0,00

0$

49

1,75

7$

Reco

mm

end

parti

al fu

ndin

g sin

ce n

umbe

r of p

rojec

t loc

atio

ns d

esig

ned

can

be sc

aled

to

fund

s ava

ilabl

e. Co

nstru

ctio

n ph

ase

to b

e fu

nded

with

SFM

TA R

even

ue B

onds

. Ca

n ap

ply

for f

utur

e Pr

op A

A o

r Pro

p K

.

8G

reen

wich

Gat

ePr

esid

io

Trus

tD

esig

n,

Cons

truct

ion

$

9

05,0

97

250,

000

$

-$

No

fund

s ava

ilabl

e af

ter f

undi

ng h

ighe

r sco

ring

proj

ects

. Des

ign

is 10

% c

ompl

ete;

addi

tiona

l pub

lic o

utre

ach

is ne

eded

bef

ore

proj

ect a

dvan

ces t

o fin

al de

sign

and

cons

truct

ion.

Pot

entia

l can

dida

te fo

r fut

ure

Prop

AA

or T

rans

porta

tion

Fund

for C

lean

Air

fund

s.

$

22,6

59,8

29

$

2,0

43,19

7 $

1,6

84,9

54

Use

s all

fund

s ava

ilabe

for r

epro

gram

min

g in

this

cate

gory

($68

0,80

0) a

nd S

treet

Rep

air

($4,

417)

, plu

s $99

9,73

7 fr

om c

apita

l res

erve

.

Tran

sit R

eliab

ility

and

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ent C

ateg

ory.

Eva

luat

ion

Scor

e1Pr

ojec

t Nam

eSp

onso

r2Ph

ase(

s)T

otal

Pro

ject

C

ost

Prop

AA

Req

uest

edR

ecom

men

ded

Prop

AA

Pro

gram

min

gN

otes

9.5

Mun

i Bus

Lay

over

A

rea a

t BA

RT

Daly

City

Sta

tion

BART

Cons

truct

ion

$

5

50,0

00

550,

000

$

507,

980

$

Proj

ect i

s rea

dy to

adve

rtise

for c

onst

ruct

ion.

Pro

p A

A w

ill le

vera

ge fu

nds f

rom

BA

RT

and

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y. Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

will

fund

the

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n th

e re

ques

ted

amou

nt a

nd th

e am

ount

ava

ilabl

e in

this

Prop

AA

cat

egor

y. BA

RT h

as su

bmitt

ed a

co

ncur

rent

Pro

p A

A fu

ndin

g re

ques

t.

$

5

50,0

00

$

5

50,0

00

$

50

7,98

0 U

ses a

ll fu

nds a

vaila

ble

for r

epro

gram

min

g in

this

cate

gory

.

TO

TAL

23,2

09,8

29$

2,

593,

197

$

2,

192,

934

$

1,1

93,19

7$

999,

737

$

2,19

2,93

4$

240,

000

$

(~

5% o

f ann

ual r

even

ues n

et o

f 5%

for p

rogr

am a

dmin

istra

tion)

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

Cat

egor

y Su

b-T

otal

Avai

labl

e fro

m d

eobl

igat

ions

and

repr

ogra

mm

ing

Avai

labl

e fro

m (i

ncre

ased

) Pro

p AA

Cap

ital R

eser

ve

Amou

nt

Avai

labl

e fo

r Pr

ogra

mm

ing

1 Pr

ojec

ts a

re so

rted

by e

valu

atio

n sc

ore

from

hig

hest

rank

ed to

low

est.

2 Sp

onso

r abb

revi

atio

ns in

clud

e: Ba

y A

rea

Rapi

d Tr

ansit

Dist

rict (

BART

); th

e Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Age

ncy

(SFM

TA),

and

San

Fran

cisc

o Pu

blic

Wor

ks (S

FPW

).

Tra

nsit

Rel

iabi

lity

and

Mob

ility

Im

prov

emen

t Cat

egor

y Su

b-T

otal

TO

TAL

AVA

ILAB

LE

RE

MAI

NIN

G C

APIT

AL R

ESE

RVE

M:\

CAC\

Mee

tings

\Mem

os\2

016\

02 F

eb\P

rop

AA\A

TT 3

Dra

ft P

rogr

amm

ing

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Page

1 o

f 147

Attachment 4. Prop AA Strategic Plan

Programming and Allocations (Pending Board Approval 3.22.16)

P:\Prop AA\2 Strategic Plan\3 Living Project List\5-Year Project List.xlsx Page 1 of 1

Project Name Phase Sponsor Fiscal Year 2012/13

Fiscal Year 2013/14

Fiscal Year 2014/15

Fiscal Year 2015/16

Fiscal Year 2016/17 5-Year Total

Street Repair and Reconstruction4,358,888$ 2,210,086$ 2,210,086$ 2,210,086$ 2,210,086$ 13,199,232$

9th Street Pavement Renovation CON SFPW 2,216,627$ 2,216,627$ CON SFPW 1,174,260$ 1,174,260$

Deobligation SFPW (4,417)$ (4,417)$ Chinatown Broadway St4 DES SFPW 650,000$ 650,000$

DES SFMTA 202,228$ 202,228$ CON SFMTA 2,325,624$ 2,325,624$

McAllister St Pavement Renovation CON SFPW 2,210,000$ 2,210,000$ Dolores St Pavement Renovation9 CON SFPW 2,210,000$ 2,210,000$ Brannan St Pavement Renovation CON SFPW 2,210,000$ 2,210,000$

Subtotal Programmed (48%) 3,386,470$ 3,062,228$ 4,535,624$ -$ 2,210,000$ 13,194,322$

Pedestrian Safety2,179,444$ 1,365,043$ 1,105,043$ 2,104,780$ 1,105,043$ 7,859,353$

Arguello Gap Closure2 CON Presidio 350,000$ 350,000$ DES SFMTA 55,000$ 55,000$ CON SFMTA 310,000$ 310,000$

Ellis/Eddy Traffic Calming Improvement4,

5 DES SFMTA 337,450$ -$ 337,450$

DES SFMTA 825,000$ 825,000$ Deobligation SFMTA (564,730)$ (564,730)$

CON SFMTA 636,480$ 636,480$ DES SFMTA -$ -$ CON SFMTA -$ -$

Pedestrian Countdown Signals CON SFMTA 1,683,000$ 1,683,000$ DES UC Hastings 83,000$ 83,000$ CON UC Hastings 1,762,206$ 1,762,206$ DES SFMTA 260,000$ 260,000$ CON SFMTA 104,794$ 104,794$ DES SFMTA 300,000$ 300,000$

DES/CON SFMTA 37,000$ 37,000$ Broadway Chinatown Streetscape Improvements CON SFPW 1,029,839$ 1,029,839$

Mansell Streetscape Improvements CON SFPW 163,358$ 163,358$ Bulb-outs at WalkFirst  Locations DES SFMTA 491,757$ 491,757$

Subtotal Programmed (28%) 1,683,000$ 1,085,720$ 2,968,686$ 2,126,748$ -$ 7,864,154$

Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvements2,179,444$ 1,105,043$ 1,105,043$ 1,105,043$ 1,105,043$ 6,599,616$

Civic Center BART/Muni Bike Station CON BART248,000$

248,000$

DES SFMTA 42,000$ 42,000$ CON SFMTA 891,000$ 891,000$ CON SFMTA -$ -$ DES MOH 195,000$ 195,000$ CON MOH 1,649,994$ 1,649,994$ CON BART 1,217,811$ 1,217,811$

Deobligation BART (503,980)$ (503,980)$

Rapid Network Placeholder10 DES/CON SFMTA -$ 965,000$ 1,099,919$ 2,064,919$

Elevator Safety and Reliability Upgrades11 CON SFMTA 287,000$ 287,000$ Muni Bus Layover Area at BART Daly City Station CON BART 507,980$ 507,980$

Subtotal Programmed (24%) 713,831$ 2,134,994$ 891,000$ 1,759,980$ 1,099,919$ 6,599,724$

Total Programmed 5,783,301$ 6,282,942$ 8,395,310$ 3,886,728$ 3,309,919$ 27,658,200$

Total Available Funds 8,717,775$ 4,680,172$ 4,420,172$ 5,419,909$ 4,420,172$ 27,658,200$

AllocatedPendingProposed New Programming

24th St Mission SW BART Plaza and Pedestrian Improvements1

Franklin and Divisadero Signal Upgrades4

Funds Available in Category

City College Pedestrian Connector4

Mid-Block Crossing on Natoma/8th4

Mansell Corridor Improvement Project4

Hunters View Transit Connection4,7

Funds Available in Category

28th Ave Pavement Renovation

Funds Available in Category

Webster St Pedestrian Signals8

Gough St Pedestrian Signals

Franklin St Pedestrian Signals4

McAllister St Campus Streetscape3

48

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\Prop K_AA grouped\Prop K_AA Grouped Memo CAC 02.24.16.docx Page 1 of 3

Memorandum

02.18.16 Citizens Advisory Committee

February 24, 2016

Citizens Advisory Committee

Anna LaForte – Deputy Director for Policy and Programming

– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $10,975,410 in Prop K Funds and $794,980 in Prop AA Funds, with Conditions, for Six Requests, Subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules

As summarized in Attachments 1 and 2, we have six requests totaling $11,770,390 in Prop K and AA funds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) has requested funding for three projects, including $706,397 in Prop K funds for construction of fall protection systems at SFMTA's Presidio Division trolleybus maintenance facility; $28,000 in District 6 Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program capital funds for a new mid-block crosswalk on Sherman Street at Bessie Carmichael elementary school; and, $287,000 in Prop AA funds for major system overhauls of twelve elevators at Van Ness, Church, Castro and Forest Hill Muni Metro stations. San Francisco Public Works has requested a total of $10,241,000 in Prop K funds for the construction phases of two street resurfacing projects that will improve more than 70 city blocks, including new curb ramps. Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) has requested $507,980 in Prop AA funds to construct a bus layover area at BART’s Daly City station for SFMTA’s 14R-Mission Rapid line to accommodate planned service increases for the route. Our recommendation to fund the BART project is contingent upon Board approval of the proposed 2016 Prop AA programming recommendations, which is a separate item on this agenda.

We have received six requests for a combined total of $10,975,410 in Prop K funds and $794,980 in Prop AA funds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) at its February 24, 2016 meeting, for potential Board approval on March 22, 2016. As shown in Attachment 1, the requests come from the following Prop K and Prop AA categories:

Prop K Rehabilitate/Upgrade Existing Facilities – MUNI

Prop K Street Resurfacing, Rehab and Maintenance

Prop K Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

Prop AA Transit Reliability and Mobility Improvements

Transportation Authority Board adoption of a 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for Prop K and Prop AA programmatic categories is a prerequisite for allocation of funds from these categories.

The purpose of this memorandum is to present four Prop K requests totaling $10,975,410 and two Prop

49

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\Prop K_AA grouped\Prop K_AA Grouped Memo CAC 02.24.16.docx Page 2 of 3

AA requests totaling $794,980 to the CAC and to seek a motion of support to allocate the funds as requested. Attachment 1 summarizes the six requests, including information on proposed leveraging (i.e. stretching Prop K dollars further by matching them with other fund sources) compared with the leveraging assumptions in the Prop K Expenditure Plan. Attachment 2 provides a brief description of each project. A detailed scope, schedule, budget and funding plan for each project are included in the enclosed Allocation Request Forms.

Attachment 3 summarizes the staff recommendations for the requests, highlighting special conditions, 5YPP amendments and other items of interest. Our recommendation to fund the BART project is contingent upon Board approval of the proposed 2016 Prop AA programming recommendations, which is a separate item on this agenda.

Transportation Authority staff and project sponsors will attend the CAC meeting to provide brief presentations on some of the specific requests and to respond to any questions that the CAC may have.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $10,975,410 in Prop K funds and $794,980 in Prop AA funds, with conditions, for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $$10,975,410in Prop K funds and $794,980 in Prop AA funds, with conditions, for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, with modifications.

3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis.

This action would allocate $10,975,410 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 Prop K sales tax funds, with conditions, and $794,980 in FY 2015/16 Prop AA funds, with conditions, for six requests. The allocations would be subject to the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules contained in the enclosed Allocation Request Forms.

Attachment 4, Prop K/Prop AA Allocation Summaries - FY 2015/16, shows the total approved FY 2015/16 allocations to date for both programs, with associated annual cash flow commitments as well as the recommended allocations and cash flows that are the subject of this memorandum.

Sufficient funds are included in the adopted FY 2015/16 budget to accommodate the recommendation actions. Furthermore, sufficient funds will be included in future budgets to cover the recommended cash flow distribution for those respective fiscal years.

Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $10,975,410 in Prop K funds and $794,980 in Prop AA funds, with conditions, for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules.

50

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\Prop K_AA grouped\Prop K_AA Grouped Memo CAC 02.24.16.docx Page 3 of 3

Attachments (4): 1. Summary of Applications Received 2. Project Descriptions 3. Staff Recommendations 4. Prop K/Prop AA Allocation Summaries – FY 2015/16

Enclosure:

Prop K/Prop AA Allocation Request Forms (6)

51

Att

ach

men

t 1:

Su

mm

ary

of

Ap

pli

cati

on

s R

eceiv

ed

So

urc

e

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry 1

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

2P

roje

ct

Nam

eC

urr

en

t

Pro

p K

Req

uest

Cu

rren

t

Pro

p A

A

Req

uest

To

tal

Co

st f

or

Req

uest

ed

Ph

ase

(s)

Ex

pecte

d

Leve

rag

ing

by

EP

Lin

e 3

Actu

al

Leve

rag

ing

by

Pro

ject

Ph

ase

(s)4

Ph

ase

(s)

Req

uest

ed

Dis

tric

t

Pro

p K

20M

SF

MT

AF

all P

rote

ctio

n S

yste

ms

- P

resi

dio

Div

isio

n$7

06,3

97

$706,3

97

90%

0%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

5

Pro

p K

34

SF

PW

Cla

yto

n S

t, C

lipp

er S

t, a

nd

Po

rto

la

Dr

Pav

emen

t R

eno

vat

ion

$5,4

55,2

63

$5,4

55,2

63

79%

0%

fo

r re

ques

t; 8

6%

for

SF

PW

’s F

Y 1

5-1

6

pav

ing

pro

gram

Co

nst

ruct

ion

8

Pro

p K

34

SF

PW

Eure

ka

St,

Gra

nd

vie

w A

ve,

an

d

Man

gels

Ave

Pav

emen

t

Ren

ovat

ion

$4,7

85,7

50

$4,7

85,7

50

79%

0%

fo

r re

ques

t; 8

6%

for

SF

PW

’s F

Y 1

5-1

6

pav

ing

pro

gram

Co

nst

ruct

ion

7, 8

Pro

p K

40

SF

MT

AB

essi

e C

arm

ich

ael C

ross

wal

k

[NT

IP C

apit

al]

$28,0

00

$28,0

00

25%

0%

Pla

nn

ing,

Des

ign

,

Co

nst

ruct

ion

6

Pro

p A

AT

ran

sit

SF

MT

AE

levat

or

Saf

ety

and

Rel

iab

ility

Up

grad

es $

287,0

00

$2,7

34,5

00

NA

90%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

5, 6, 7, 8

Pro

p A

AT

ran

sit

BA

RT

Mun

i B

us

Lay

over

Are

a at

BA

RT

Dal

y C

ity

Sta

tio

n $

507,9

80

$550,0

00

NA

53%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

n/

a

$

10,9

75,4

10

$

794,9

80

$

14,2

59,9

10

Fo

otn

ote

s1 2 3 4

"Exp

ecte

d L

ever

agin

g B

y E

P L

ine"

is

calc

ula

ted b

y div

idin

g th

e to

tal n

on

-Pro

p K

fun

ds

exp

ecte

d t

o b

e av

aila

ble

fo

r a

given

Pro

p K

Exp

endit

ure

Pla

n lin

e it

em (

e.g.

Ped

estr

ian

Cir

cula

tio

n a

nd S

afet

y) b

y th

e

tota

l ex

pec

ted f

un

din

g fo

r th

at P

rop

K E

xpen

dit

ure

Pla

n lin

e it

em o

ver

th

e 30-y

ear

Exp

endit

ure

Pla

n p

erio

d. F

or

exam

ple

, ex

pec

ted lev

erag

ing

of

90%

in

dic

ates

th

at o

n a

ver

age

no

n-P

rop

K f

un

ds

sho

uld

co

ver

90%

of

the

tota

l co

sts

for

all p

roje

cts

in t

hat

cat

ego

ry, an

d P

rop

K s

ho

uld

co

ver

on

ly 1

0%

.

"Act

ual

Lev

erag

ing

by

Pro

ject

Ph

ase"

is

calc

ula

ted b

y div

idin

g th

e to

tal n

on

-Pro

p K

or

no

n-P

rop

AA

fun

ds

in t

he

fun

din

g p

lan

by

the

tota

l co

st f

or

the

reques

ted p

has

e o

r p

has

es. If

th

e p

erce

nta

ge in

th

e

"Act

ual

Lev

erag

ing"

co

lum

n is

low

er t

han

in

th

e "E

xpec

ted L

ever

agin

g" c

olu

mn

, th

e re

ques

t (i

ndic

ated

by

yello

w h

igh

ligh

tin

g) is

lever

agin

g fe

wer

no

n-P

rop

K d

olla

rs t

han

ass

um

ed in

th

e E

xpen

dit

ure

Pla

n. A

pro

ject

th

at is

wel

l le

ver

aged

over

all m

ay h

ave

low

er-t

han

-exp

ecte

d lev

erag

ing

for

an in

div

idual

or

par

tial

ph

ase.

Leve

rag

ing

TO

TA

L

" EP

Lin

e N

o./

Cat

ego

ry"

is e

ith

er t

he

Pro

p K

Exp

endit

ure

Pla

n lin

e n

um

ber

ref

eren

ced in

th

e 2014 P

rop

K S

trat

egic

Pla

n o

r th

e P

rop

AA

Exp

endit

ure

Pla

n c

ateg

ory

ref

eren

ced in

th

e 2012 P

rop

AA

Str

ateg

ic

Pla

n, in

cludin

g: S

tree

t R

epai

r an

d R

eco

nst

ruct

ion

(Str

eet)

, P

edes

tria

n S

afet

y (P

ed),

an

d T

ran

sit

Rel

iab

ility

an

d M

ob

ility

Im

pro

vem

ents

(T

ran

sit)

.

Acr

on

yms:

BA

RT

(B

ay A

rea

Rap

id T

ran

sit

Dis

tric

t); SF

MT

A (

San

Fra

nci

sco

Mun

icip

al T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

); S

FP

W (

San

Fra

nci

sco

Pub

lic W

ork

s)

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d A

TT 1

-4 C

AC

2.2

4.1

6;

1-S

um

ma

ryP

ag

e 1

of

1

52

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

e

Pro

p K

Fu

nd

s

Req

uest

ed

Pro

p A

A F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

20M

SF

MT

AF

all P

rote

ctio

n S

yste

ms

- P

resi

dio

Div

isio

n $

706,3

97

$

-

Th

e SF

MT

A is

reques

tin

g fu

nd

ing

for

the

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e fo

r

fall p

rote

ctio

n s

yste

ms

at t

he

SF

MT

A's

Pre

sid

io D

ivis

ion

tro

lley

bus

mai

nte

nan

ce f

acilit

y. T

he

pro

ject

will in

crea

se t

he

pro

duct

ivit

y o

f th

e fa

cility

by

equip

pin

g ea

ch o

f th

e ei

ght

bus

mai

nte

nan

ce lan

es w

ith

pro

tect

ion

sys

tem

s fo

r w

hat

has

bec

om

e

com

mo

nly

per

form

ed r

oo

f-to

p r

epai

rs; cu

rren

tly

on

ly o

ne

lan

e h

as

a fa

ll p

rote

ctio

n s

yste

m. T

he

SF

MT

A p

lan

s to

beg

in c

on

stru

ctio

n

in S

pri

ng

2016 a

nd

co

mp

lete

th

e p

roje

ct b

y D

ecem

ber

2016.

34

SF

PW

Cla

yto

n S

t, C

lip

per

St,

an

d P

ort

ola

Dr

Pav

emen

t R

eno

vat

ion

$

5,4

55,2

63

$

-

Fun

ds

will b

e use

d f

or

the

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e o

f p

avem

ent

ren

ovat

ion

fo

r 24 b

lock

s o

f C

lip

per

Str

eet,

Cla

yto

n S

tree

t, P

ort

ola

Dri

ve

and

Tw

in P

eaks

Bo

ule

var

d. T

he

pro

ject

sco

pe

also

in

clud

es

app

roxim

atel

y 70 n

ew c

urb

ram

ps

as w

ell as

sid

ewal

k a

nd

curb

rep

airs

. SF

PW

pla

ns

to b

egin

co

nst

ruct

ion

in

Oct

ob

er 2

016 a

nd

com

ple

te t

he

pro

ject

by

July

2017. See

pag

e X

of

the

encl

osu

re f

or

the

list

of

loca

tio

ns

for

SF

PW

's F

Y 1

5/

16 p

avin

g p

rogr

am.

34

SF

PW

Eure

ka

St,

Gra

nd

vie

w A

ve,

an

d

Man

gels

Ave

Pav

emen

t R

eno

vat

ion

$

4,7

85,7

50

$

-

Th

e SF

PW

is

reques

tin

g fu

nd

ing

for

the

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e fo

r

pav

emen

t re

no

vat

ion

on

ap

pro

xim

atel

y 47 b

lock

s o

f C

esar

Ch

avez

Str

eet,

Co

rwin

Str

eet,

Dia

mo

nd

Str

eet,

Do

ugl

ass

Str

eet,

Eure

ka

Str

eet,

Gra

nd

vie

w A

ven

ue,

Hili

rita

s A

ven

ue,

Man

gels

Aven

ue,

Mo

rela

nd

Str

eet

and

Ro

mai

n S

tree

t. T

he

pro

ject

sco

pe

also

incl

ud

es a

pp

roxim

atel

y 107 n

ew c

urb

ram

ps

as w

ell as

sid

ewal

k

and

curb

rep

airs

. SF

PW

pla

ns

to b

egin

co

nst

ruct

ion

in

Sep

tem

ber

2016 a

nd

co

mp

lete

th

e p

roje

ct b

y O

cto

ber

2017. See

pag

e X

of

the

encl

osu

re f

or

the

list

of

loca

tio

ns

for

SF

PW

's F

Y 1

5/

16 p

avin

g

pro

gram

.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d A

TT 1

-4 C

AC

2.2

4.1

6;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 1

of

2

53

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

e

Pro

p K

Fu

nd

s

Req

uest

ed

Pro

p A

A F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

40

SF

MT

AB

essi

e C

arm

ich

ael C

ross

wal

k [

NT

IP

Cap

ital

] $

2

8,0

00

$

-

Req

ues

ted

fun

ds

will b

e use

d t

o o

pen

a m

id-b

lock

cro

ssw

alk

acro

ss S

her

man

Str

eet,

co

nn

ecti

ng

the

Bes

sie

Car

mic

hae

l

Ele

men

tary

sch

oo

l ya

rd e

ntr

ance

to

th

e p

ath

way

th

rough

th

e

Vic

tori

a M

anal

o D

raves

Par

k. T

his

pro

ject

em

erge

d f

rom

a s

ite

vis

it w

ith

sch

oo

l ad

min

istr

ato

rs a

nd

co

mm

un

ity

mem

ber

s.

Imp

rovem

ents

in

clud

e tw

o n

ew c

urb

ram

ps,

a p

ain

ted

cro

ssw

alk,

and

sch

oo

l cr

oss

ing

sign

age.

Th

e SF

MT

A e

xp

ects

to

sec

ure

legi

slat

ive

and

en

vir

on

men

tal cl

eara

nce

s b

y D

ecem

ber

2016, an

d

com

ple

te d

esig

n b

y Ju

ne

2017. T

he

pro

ject

is

exp

ecte

d t

o b

e o

pen

for

use

by

Dec

emb

er 2

017. C

on

stru

ctio

n w

ould

be

per

form

ed b

y

city

cre

ws.

Tra

nsi

t SF

MT

AE

levat

or

Saf

ety

and

Rel

iab

ilit

y

Up

grad

es $

- $

287,0

00

Fun

ds

will b

e use

d f

or

the

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e o

f co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

up

grad

es t

o 1

2 e

levat

ors

at

the

Van

Nes

s (2

), C

astr

o (

3),

Ch

urc

h

(3),

an

d F

ore

st H

ill (

4)

Mun

i M

etro

Sta

tio

ns.

Th

e p

roje

ct w

ill

imp

rove

acce

ss t

o lig

ht

rail s

tati

on

s w

hic

h a

re a

cri

tica

l co

mp

on

ent

of

Mun

i’s R

apid

Net

wo

rk. C

on

stru

ctio

n w

ould

beg

in in

Sum

mer

2016 a

nd

co

nti

nue

thro

ugh

Sp

rin

g 2020.

Tra

nsi

t B

AR

TM

un

i B

us

Lay

over

Are

a at

BA

RT

Dal

y C

ity

Sta

tio

n $

- $

507,9

80

Req

ues

ted

fun

ds

will b

e use

d f

or

con

stru

ctio

n o

f a

bus

layo

ver

area

fo

r th

e M

un

i 14R

-Mis

sio

n R

apid

at

the

BA

RT

Dal

y C

ity

Sta

tio

n t

o a

cco

mm

od

ate

pla

nn

ed s

ervic

e in

crea

ses

for

the

route

.

Th

e st

atio

n s

erves

as

the

term

inal

of

the

14R

-Mis

sio

n a

nd

due

to

exis

tin

g sp

ace

con

stra

ints

, M

un

i b

use

s cu

rren

tly

layo

ver

outs

ide

the

stat

ion

on

De

Lo

ng

Str

eet

wh

ere

they

so

met

imes

blo

ck t

he

stre

et a

nd

are

sub

ject

to

cit

atio

n. T

his

pro

ject

wo

uld

co

nver

t

app

roxim

atel

y 30 p

aid

par

kin

g sp

aces

wit

hin

th

e B

AR

T p

arkin

g lo

t

into

a n

ew b

us

layo

ver

are

a. L

oss

of

par

kin

g re

ven

ue

wo

uld

be

off

set

by

incr

ease

d B

AR

T f

are

reven

ues

fro

m a

dd

itio

nal

rid

ers

arri

vin

g via

th

e 14R

-Mis

sio

n. T

he

pro

ject

wo

uld

sta

rt c

on

stru

ctio

n

in O

cto

ber

an

d b

e o

pen

fo

r use

by

Dec

emb

er 2

016.

$

10

,975,4

10

$

7

94,9

80

1 S

ee A

ttac

hm

ent

1 f

or

foo

tno

tes.

TO

TA

L

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d A

TT 1

-4 C

AC

2.2

4.1

6;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 2

of

2

54

Att

ach

men

t 3:

Sta

ff R

eco

mm

en

dati

on

s 1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ryP

roje

ct

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

e

Pro

p K

Fu

nd

s

Reco

mm

en

ded

Pro

p A

A F

un

ds

Reco

mm

en

ded

Reco

mm

en

dati

on

20M

SF

MT

AF

all P

rote

ctio

n S

yste

ms

- P

resi

dio

Div

isio

n $

7

06,3

97

$

-

5-Y

ear

Pri

ori

tizati

on

Pro

gra

m (

5Y

PP

) am

en

dm

en

t: T

he

reco

mm

endat

ion

is

con

tin

gen

t up

on

a c

on

curr

ent

amen

dm

ent

to t

he

Mun

i F

acili

ties

5Y

PP

to

rep

rogr

am $

706,3

97 in

Fis

cal Y

ear

2014/15

pla

nn

ing

fun

ds

fro

m t

he

Wo

ods

Ren

ovat

ion

Ho

ists

an

d B

ays

pro

ject

to t

he

sub

ject

pro

ject

. T

he

SF

MT

A is

rep

rio

riti

zin

g p

lan

ned

fac

ility

imp

rovem

ents

as

par

t o

f it

s C

apit

al I

mp

rovem

ents

Pro

gram

up

dat

e,

anti

cip

ated

to

be

com

ple

te in

Sp

rin

g 2016, an

d t

he

Wo

ods

Div

isio

n

pro

ject

is

no

t ex

pec

ted t

o m

ove

forw

ard. See

att

ach

ed 5

YP

P

amen

dm

ent

for

det

ails

.

34

SF

PW

Cla

yto

n S

t, C

lipp

er S

t, a

nd

Po

rto

la

Dr

Pav

emen

t R

eno

vat

ion

$ 5,4

55,2

63

$

-

5Y

PP

am

en

dm

en

t: T

he

reco

mm

endat

ion

is

con

tin

gen

t up

on

a

con

curr

ent

5Y

PP

am

endm

ent

to t

he

Str

eet

Res

urf

acin

g,

Reh

abili

tati

on

an

d M

ain

ten

ance

5Y

PP

to

pro

gram

$90,0

33 in

cum

ula

tive

rem

ain

ing

pro

gram

min

g ca

pac

ity

to t

he

sub

ject

pro

ject

.

See

att

ach

ed 5

YP

P a

men

dm

ent

for

det

ails

.

34

SF

PW

Eure

ka

St, G

ran

dvie

w A

ve,

an

d

Man

gels

Ave

Pav

emen

t R

eno

vat

ion

$ 4,7

85,7

50

$

-

5Y

PP

am

en

dm

en

t: T

he

reco

mm

endat

ion

is

con

tin

gen

t up

on

a

con

curr

ent

5Y

PP

am

endm

ent

to t

he

Str

eet

Res

urf

acin

g,

Reh

abili

tati

on

an

d M

ain

ten

ance

5Y

PP

to

pro

gram

$4,7

85,7

50 in

cum

ula

tive

rem

ain

ing

pro

gram

min

g ca

pac

ity

to t

he

sub

ject

pro

ject

.

See

att

ach

ed 5

YP

P a

men

dm

ent

for

det

ails

.

40

SF

MT

AB

essi

e C

arm

ich

ael C

ross

wal

k [

NT

IP

Cap

ital

] $

28,0

00

$

-

We

are

reco

mm

endin

g a

mu

lti-

ph

ase

all

ocati

on

giv

en t

he

stra

igh

tfo

rwar

d a

nd n

on

-co

ntr

over

sial

nat

ure

of

the

sco

pe,

an

d t

he

smal

l am

oun

t o

f fu

ndin

g re

ques

ted.

Tra

nsi

t SF

MT

AE

levat

or

Saf

ety

and

Rel

iab

ility

Up

grad

es $

-

$

287,0

00

Pro

p A

A S

trate

gic

Pla

n A

men

dm

en

t: T

he

reco

mm

endat

ion

is

con

tin

gen

t up

on

a c

on

curr

ent

Pro

p A

A S

trat

egic

Pla

n a

men

dm

ent

to

rep

rogr

am $

287,0

00 in

Fis

cal Y

ear

2014/15 f

un

ds

pro

gram

med

to

Rap

id N

etw

ork

Pla

ceh

old

er t

o t

he

sub

ject

pro

ject

. See

att

ach

ed

amen

dm

ent

for

det

ails

.

Tra

nsi

t B

AR

TM

un

i B

us

Lay

over

Are

a at

BA

RT

Dal

y C

ity

Sta

tio

n $

-

$

507,9

80

Rec

om

men

dat

ion

is

con

tin

gen

t up

on

ap

pro

val

of

a p

rio

r it

em o

n t

his

mee

tin

g ag

enda

to a

men

d t

he

Pro

p A

A S

trat

egic

Pla

n t

o p

rogr

am

fun

ds

to t

he

sub

ject

pro

ject

.

$ 10

,975,4

10

$ 794,9

80

1 S

ee A

ttac

hm

ent

1 f

or

foo

tno

tes.

TO

TA

L

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

6\0

2 F

eb

\Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d A

TT 1

-4 C

AC

2.2

4.1

6;

3-R

eco

mm

en

da

tio

ns

Pa

ge

1 o

f 1

55

Attachment 4.

Prop K/ Prop AA Allocation Summaries - FY 2015/16

PROP K SALES TAX

CASH FLOW

Total FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 2019/20

Prior Allocations 177,921,117$ 96,473,275$ 71,239,568$ 9,927,720$ 150,577$ 32,495$

Current Request(s) 10,975,410$ -$ 8,142,944$ 2,832,466$ -$ -$

New Total Allocations 188,896,527$ 96,473,275$ 79,382,512$ 12,760,186$ 150,577$ 32,495$

PROP AA VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE

Total FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18

Prior Allocations 300,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$

Current Request(s) 794,980$ -$ 579,730$ 71,750$

New Total Allocations 1,094,980$ 150,000$ 729,730$ 71,750$

The above table shows maximum annual cash flow for all FY 2015/16 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended

The above table shows total cash flow for all FY 2015/16 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended allocation(s).

Strategic Initiatives

1.3% Paratransit 8.6%

Streets & Traffic Safety

24.6% Transit 65.5%

Investment Commitments, per Prop K Expenditure Plan

Strategic Initiatives

0.8% Paratransit 7.8%

Streets & Traffic Safety 19.3%

Transit 72.1%

Prop K Investments To Date

Street Repair & Reconstruction

52.9%

Pedestrian Safety 29.1%

Transit Reliability &

Mobility Improvements

18.0%

Prop AA Investments To Date

Street Repair & Reconstruction

50.0%

Pedestrian Safety 25.0%

Transit Reliability & Mobility

Improvements 25.0%

Investment Commitments, per Prop AA Expenditure Plan

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\Prop K_AA grouped\Prop K Grouped ATT 1-4 CAC 2.24.16

56

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\West Side SAR\West Side SAR CAC Memorandum.docx Page 1 of 4

Memorandum

02.17.2016 Citizens Advisory Committee

February 24, 2016

Citizens Advisory Committee

Rachel Hiatt – Acting Deputy Director for Planning

– Adopt a Motion of Support for Approval of the Improving West Side Transit Access Strategic Analysis Report

At the November 18, 2014 meeting of the Finance Committee, Commissioner Tang requested that we initiate a Strategic Analysis Report (SAR) to investigate options for improving access to transit on the west side of San Francisco. The purpose of the study is to recommend options for improving access to major West Side transit hubs, especially the West Portal Muni station and Daly City BART station, with the ultimate goal of encouraging alternatives to driving alone to access transit hubs or downtown. As called for in the Transportation Authority’s adopted procedures governing the development of SARs, the draft SAR is brought directly to the committee on which the requestor sits for comments and guidance. In this case, we brought the draft SAR to the February Plans and Programs Committee meeting which Commissioner Tang chairs and subsequently, have been seeking input from relevant city agencies and other interested parties. We will present the SAR findings to the Citizens Advisory Committee on February 24 and anticipate seeking a recommendation to approve the final SAR from the Plans and Programs Committee in March.

Strategic Analysis Reports (SARs) are prepared periodically by Transportation Authority staff to advise the Transportation Authority (TA) on policy issues or topics of interest to Board members. This SAR, initiated at the request of Transportation Authority Commissioner Tang, analyzes options for improving access to West Side transit hubs, particularly Daly City BART and West Portal Muni stations, primarily via bicycling, public transit or carpooling to hubs. This study uses the term “West Side” to refer to the area south of Golden Gate Park, West of the hill districts, and north of the county line.

Supporting alternatives to driving is particularly critical for West Side residents, who drive more for their daily trips than residents of most other San Francisco neighborhoods. About 62 percent of daily person-trips from the West Side are made by driving, higher than all neighborhoods except the Hill Districts, Outer Mission, and Bayshore areas. Multiple factors contribute to West Side residents’ relatively higher car use. One likely factor is the lack of grade-separated transit access to major job centers, which exists only at the periphery of the area, at the Muni rail Forest Hill and West Portal Stations, and at the BART Daly City and Balboa Bark Stations. West side residents must therefore rely primarily on surface-running transit, which can be slower and subject to delays from cross traffic at intersections. Extending subways into to the West Side, or providing other forms of transit grade-separation would help address the problem, but these kinds of improvements take many years to plan and deliver. This study provides near term recommendations for improving access to existing transit hubs while longer-term solutions are being developed.

57

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\West Side SAR\West Side SAR CAC Memorandum.docx Page 2 of 4

The purpose of the SAR was to analyze options for improving access to West Side transit hubs, especially the West Portal Muni Station and the Daly City BART Station, with the ultimate goal of encouraging greater access by transit, bicycling, and carpooling.

We approached the study questions in three steps:

Existing conditions review. We developed an inventory of known transportation challenges that may be inhibiting access to West Side transit hubs, based on reviewing previous studies and planned projects, interviewing relevant agency staff, analyzing the quality of available access modes (focusing on bicycling, pickup/drop-off, and transit), and holding a community focus group.

Prioritization of access improvement concepts. To help prioritize access improvement concepts, we surveyed West Side households and intercepted transit riders at West Portal, Daly City, and Balboa Park stations to ask them about which types of investments would be most likely to encourage them to take transit or bike to West Side transit hubs rather than driving alone to the hubs or their final destination.

Recommendations. Using the survey results, we prioritized improvement concepts according to what would appeal to the largest number of West Side drivers. We then prepared recommendations linking the general access challenges identified in the survey with the more specific access challenges identified as part of the existing conditions review. These recommendations reflect agency input from both BART and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. Draft recommendations have also been shared with the Transportation Authority’s Plans and Programs Committee and West Portal community groups.

Improve the travel time and reliability of West Side transit routes. Surveys of West Side residents and transit users collected for this study indicated that faster transit service (e.g. shorter travel times) and improved reliability are most likely to encourage drivers to take transit to access West Side hubs. Multiple projects are underway to improve travel time and on many of the routes serving West Side transit hubs, such as the ongoing project to speed service on the L-Taraval, which connects to West Portal and directly downtown. Implementing these projects is critical to improving access to transit hubs. Beyond these efforts, the 29-Sunset stands out as a promising opportunity for additional improvement. This route serves a major West Side transit hub (Balboa Park BART), but travel times are long for most West Side residents. Ridership has grown by about 40 percent since 2007, and vehicles are experiencing crowding in some locations. All these factors suggest that additional investment is justified. Additional work is also needed to address reliability problems affecting access to transit hubs. We recommend continuing and augmenting ongoing efforts to address reliability at the West Portal Station by addressing circulation issues affecting all modes of travel and identifying strategies to reduce transit delay. A final recommendation is to develop a plan for accommodating more frequent bus service to the Daly City BART station. Our analysis found that Daly City BART station as currently configured lacks space to absorb more frequent connecting bus service.

Leverage Underutilized Routes to Strengthen Connections to Hubs. Survey responses suggest that lack of nearby transit routes is not a top barrier to taking transit. However, there are opportunities to reconfigure existing, lower-performing routes to improve performance and

58

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\West Side SAR\West Side SAR CAC Memorandum.docx Page 3 of 4

strengthen connections to transit hubs. Several routes on the West Side are underutilized but the 66-Quintara stands out as the least utilized route in the study area and one that lacks connections to major destinations or transit hubs. We recommend studying options to improve the 66-Quintara or other lower performing routes.

Pilot methods of encouraging carpooling and ridesharing to transit hubs. Our survey found that about a third of drivers would consider taking a shared ride service to access West Side transit hubs; drivers appeared to be more interested in these services than non-drivers. Shared ride services have the potential to expand the options available to drivers interested in taking transit from a major hub, especially for those who live outside walking distance of their preferred transit route. We recommend developing a scope of work and seeking funding for a pilot project to encourage carpooling and ridesharing to hubs.

Increase bicyclist’ safety and comfort to encourage bicycling to hubs. Survey results suggest that improving bicycle safety, addressing challenges associated with hilly terrain, and reducing the incidence of bicycle theft should be top priorities for encouraging more bicycling by residents in the Southwest part of the city. Based on this, top recommendations include implementing planned projects to improve bicycle safety in the Geneva Corridor and on Ocean Avenue (or on parallel routes), which provide connections to the Balboa Park BART station; implementing secure bicycle parking in the West Portal area to allow commuters to leave bikes securely while they travel downtown; and identifying funding for a study to develop a plan for improved bicycle connections to the Daly City BART station.

Explore subway extensions and creating freeway high occupancy vehicle lanes for express buses. Expanding direct access to underground rail or other grade-separated transit has the potential to significantly improve travel times to downtown for West Side residents, especially those not currently living near a hub. Plans are already underway to underground portions of the M-Line through the M-Ocean View/19th Avenue Project, and the potential for additional subway expansions could be considered as part of the Transit Modal Concept Study in the next Long Range Transportation Planning Process. Another strategy for reducing travel times between the West Side and downtown would be to dedicate a lane to transit buses on I-280, which would allow buses from the West Side to express downtown within 20 minutes or less once on the freeway. The viability of this idea could be explored as part of developing the Freeway and Street Traffic Management Strategy in the upcoming Long Range Transportation Planning Process (LRTPP).

Develop a strategy for reducing reliance on single occupant vehicle driving for travel between the West Side and South Bay. Our analysis focused on travel between the West Side and downtown San Francisco, which is the second most common commute destination. Future studies should also examine how best to reduce driving dependence for West Side workers destined for the South Bay, which is the top commute destination but more difficult to serve by transit given low employment densities and an abundance of parking relative to downtown San Francisco. Approximately 90 percent of morning peak period trips between the Sunset and South Bay are currently made by driving, compared to about 28 percent of trips between the Sunset and downtown. Future studies could examine options such as providing direct express bus services between the West Side and top South Bay commute destinations; providing more continuous dedicated high occupancy vehicle/transit lanes on US 101 or I-280; providing direct incentives for carpooling/ridesharing; or strengthening connections to Caltrain. These ideas could be

59

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2016\02 Feb\West Side SAR\West Side SAR CAC Memorandum.docx Page 4 of 4

considered as part of developing the Freeway and Street Traffic Management Strategy in the upcoming LRTPP.

1. Adopt a motion of support for approval of the Improving West Side Transit Access SAR, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for approval of the Improving West Side Transit Access SAR with modifications.

3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis.

None.

Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the Improving West Side Transit Access SAR.

Enclosure:

1. Draft Improving West Side Transit Access Strategic Analysis Report

60

SFM

TA R

ail C

apac

ity

Stra

tegy

Febr

uary

24,

201

6 SF

CTA

Citi

zens

Adv

isor

y C

omm

ittee

61

•R

ail C

apac

ity S

trat

egy

–Pu

rpos

e &

Nee

d –

Sco

pe

•M

etho

dolo

gy

•Sy

stem

-wi d

e In

vest

men

ts

•N

ear-T

erm

Inve

stm

ents

•

Wor

ksho

ps &

Out

reac

h •

Med

ium

/Lon

g-T e

rm In

vest

men

ts

•N

ext S

teps

& D

iscu

ssio

n

P res

enta

tion

Ove

rvie

w

62

Crow

ded

Mun

i Tr

ain/

Plat

form

Ph

oto

63

•Pr

iorit

ized

ove

r ne

xt t

wo

CIP

cyc

les

(0-1

0 ye

ar)

–S

peci

fic p

roje

cts

(sco

pe, s

ched

ule,

bud

get)

tha

t le

vera

ge S

OG

R o

ppor

tuni

ties

and

can

be a

dded

to

CIP

•Pr

iorit

ized

Mid

& L

ong

Term

(10-

20+

yea

r)

Cap

acity

Impr

ovem

ent a

nd E

xpan

sion

Cor

ridor

C

once

pts

–O

rder

of

Mag

nitu

de/U

nit C

ost

Bas

ed C

ost

Est

imat

es

Rai

l Cap

acity

Str

ateg

y D

eliv

erab

les

64

Met

hodo

logy

65

Syst

em-w

ide

Inve

stm

ents

66

Nea

r-te

rm In

vest

men

ts

67

Syst

emw

ide

& N

ear-

term

Inve

stm

ents

68

Wor

ksho

ps &

Onl

ine

Feed

back

69

Long

-Ter

m In

vest

men

ts

70

11

Long

-Ter

m Im

plem

enta

tion

Roa

dmap

71

Crow

ded

Mun

i Tr

ain/

Plat

form

Ph

oto

Gra

hm S

atte

rwhi

te

Prin

cipa

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n P

lann

er

Gra

hm.S

atte

rwhi

te@

sfm

ta.c

om

Que

stio

ns

72

19

th A

ve/M

-Lin

e p

roje

ct

Pre

sen

tatio

n t

o S

FC

TA

CA

C

Febru

ary

24

, 2

01

6

1

73

2

Image C

redit:

San F

rancis

co’s

West of T

win

Peaks; A

rcadia

, 2006, p. 61

Ra

il h

as

be

en

pa

rt o

f S

F h

isto

ry f

or

ge

ne

rati

on

s:

M-l

ine

beg

an

op

era

tio

n in

1925 w

hen

19

th A

ve w

as a

co

un

try r

oad

74

3

Fa

st

forw

ard

to

19

70

s, in

tro

du

cti

on

of

BA

RT

an

d M

un

i

Metr

o

Image C

redit:

Left

-BA

RT

; R

ight-

flic

kr

user

Eric F

isher

75

4

Fa

st

forw

ard

to

20

16

: n

ow

we

are

bu

rsti

ng

at

the

se

am

s!

76

5

An

d 1

9th

Ave

nu

e i

s n

ot

wo

rkin

g f

or

an

yo

ne

77

•U

pg

rad

e t

he M

un

i M

etr

o to p

rovid

e fast,

relia

ble

, u

n-c

row

de

d s

erv

ice

•R

e-d

esig

n 1

9th

Av

en

ue

as a

sa

fer

str

ee

t fo

r e

ve

ryo

ne

We

are

in

ve

ry e

arly s

tag

es. N

o a

ppro

va

l d

ecis

ion

s h

ave

bee

n m

ad

e.

If a

pp

rove

d,

co

nstr

uction

wo

uld

be

8+

ye

ars

aw

ay.

6

Th

e 1

9th

Ave

nu

e/M

-Oc

ea

n V

iew

Pro

jec

t p

rop

os

es

a m

ajo

r

investm

en

t to

:

78

7

Stu

dy a

rea

79

8

Faste

r, m

ore

relia

ble

,

addre

ss c

row

din

g

Safe

r tr

ansit a

ccess

Safe

r, m

ore

ple

asant

experience f

or

people

walk

ing,

cyclin

g

Support

pla

nned

develo

pm

ent

with t

ravel

choic

es

Reduce b

ott

leneck p

oin

ts

that

affect re

liabili

ty f

or

people

drivin

g

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

80

9

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

Fa

ste

r, m

ore

re

liable

,

addre

ss c

row

din

g

81

10

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

Fa

ste

r, m

ore

re

liable

,

addre

ss c

row

din

g

82

11

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

Fa

ste

r, m

ore

re

liable

,

addre

ss c

row

din

g

83

12

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

Safe

r tr

ansit a

ccess

84

13

Pu

rpo

se

an

d n

ee

d

Safe

r tr

ansit a

ccess

19

th A

ve

nu

e i

s p

art

of

12%

of

mil

es

of

str

ee

t

Wh

ere

70

% o

f all s

evere

an

d f

ata

l co

llis

ion

s i

n S

an

Fra

nc

isc

o o

cc

ur

85

14

Wh

at

we

’re

pro

po

sin

g

To

Da

ly C

ity

86

15

Th

is c

on

ce

pt

wo

uld

tu

rns

“h

alf

” a

ra

pid

tra

ns

it lin

e in

to a

“w

ho

le” o

ne

Po

ten

tia

l: C

arr

y 4

-ca

r lig

ht-

rail

train

s

To

day:

1-c

ar

To

day:

2-c

ar

= S

tudy A

rea

=

Syste

m B

enefits

87

Eli

min

ate

s m

an

y f

ac

tors

th

at

cre

ate

mem

ora

ble

bad

co

mm

ute

da

ys

16

88

17

Ex

am

ple

tri

p t

od

ay (

aft

ern

oo

n t

rip

do

wn

tow

n t

o w

est-

sid

e)

1.

Van

Ness S

tati

on

– P

acked t

rain

s

2.

West

Po

rtal

– B

ott

leneck

3.

St.

Fra

ncis

Cir

cle

– B

ott

leneck

4.

19

th A

ven

ue -

- (C

onflic

ts

Rossm

oor,

Win

sto

n,

Hollo

wa

y,

Junip

ero

Serr

a)

5.

Gap

s a

nd

Bu

nch

es d

ue t

o 1

-4

89

18

Ex

am

ple

tri

p in

th

e f

utu

re w

ith

pro

po

se

d p

roje

ct

1.

Van

Ness S

tati

on

– L

ong tra

ins f

lush o

ut

all

the r

iders

just tr

yin

g t

o g

et

to C

hurc

h/C

astr

o

an

d d

on

’t p

ass-u

p r

iders

needin

g to g

et

all

the

way t

o w

ests

ide

2.

West

Po

rtal

– L

com

es o

ut

at

surf

ace,

KM

sta

y u

nderg

round,

alle

via

ting b

ottle

neck

3.

St.

Fra

ncis

Cir

cle

– K

an

d M

go u

nder

this

inte

rsection a

nd a

void

the 2

.5-3

min

ute

sig

nal cycle

.

4.

19

th A

ven

ue –

No

wa

itin

g a

t in

ters

ectio

ns

or

pote

ntial fo

r vehic

les b

lockin

g tra

cks a

t

Rossm

oor,

Win

sto

n, H

ollo

way,

Junip

ero

Serr

a

5.

Betw

een

SF

Sta

te a

nd

BP

– C

ross-

pla

tform

tra

nsfe

r to

J-lin

e

90

19

Pro

po

se

d s

tati

on

lo

ca

tio

ns

91

20

Pro

po

se

d s

tati

on

en

tra

nc

es

– S

ton

es

tow

n G

alle

ria

*Re

pre

se

nta

tiv

e d

es

ign

. P

roje

ct

ma

teri

als

in

clu

de

ad

dit

ion

al lo

ca

tio

ns

92

21

Pro

po

se

d s

tre

et

re-d

es

ign

fo

r s

afe

ty a

nd

be

au

tifi

ca

tio

n,

Ho

llo

way

Ex

isti

ng

Pro

po

se

d

*Re

pre

se

nta

tiv

e d

es

ign

. P

roje

ct

ma

teri

als

in

clu

de

ad

dit

ion

al lo

ca

tio

ns

93

22

Re

fin

ed

alt

ern

ati

ve

s

Alt

ern

ati

ve

1

“De

fau

lt P

ark

me

rce

d P

lan

”

(All

Surf

ace)

Alt

ern

ati

ve

2

“Pa

rtia

l S

ub

wa

y a

nd

Bri

dg

e”

Alt

ern

ati

ve

3

“Fu

ll S

ub

wa

y”

To

Da

ly C

ity

To

Da

ly C

ity

94

23

Enviro

nm

en

tal re

vie

w is t

he s

tage

wh

en

qu

estio

ns a

bo

ut im

pa

cts

an

d m

itig

atio

ns

are

answ

ere

d. E

.g. constr

uction im

pa

cts

,

traffic

, nois

e, vis

ual, e

tc.

Wh

ere

we

’re

he

ad

ed

ne

xt

95

Liz

Brisson

Pro

ject M

an

ag

er

Liz

.brisson@

sfm

ta.c

om

415

.70

1.4

79

1

24

Th

an

k y

ou

. Q

ue

sti

on

s?

96