+ All Categories
Home > Documents > AgreeDisagree Group Final Final FINAL FINAAAAAAAL

AgreeDisagree Group Final Final FINAL FINAAAAAAAL

Date post: 19-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: luigee-castillo
View: 230 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
gf
Popular Tags:
12
AGREE ON FORM-LINKED SOLUTIONS TOWARDS THE FUTURE Development in architecture has changed the perception of architects and designers with regards to design tradition and innovation. The linkage between two existing concepts is now being regarded and considered as part of a progressive and creative process. This system of thinking has been much influenced even by non-architectural writers such as Thomas Kuhn and George Kubler. Living at the same period, both writers have produced their most important works which are the “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” and “The Shape of Time” respectively. Even though both writers address different perception on design development, they have deeply discoursed and addressed the profound aspects and relationship of tradition, innovation and change. In the article, Thomas Kuhn has focused on the concept of “Paradigm”. Though, the author of the article has assessed his work and has been certain that neither of Kuhn’s key concepts and definition of paradigm is clearly defined, thus vague and can lead to misunderstanding. To clearly interpret his idea, Margaret Masterman, wrote in her paper namely “The Nature of Paradigm, that she has found twenty one different use of term in Kuhn’s work and it can be categorized into three basic idea from the most abstract to the most concrete. First of this is the most abstract, wherein the usage of Paradigm can be defined as a set of belief or a myth. At the next level, the usage of paradigm is defined as a set of political institutions or a judicial decision. Lastly, the most concrete of all, the paradigm was used as an actual work or even a set of tools. Transformation in perception and innovation is one of the emerging developments in architectural theories. According to Thomas Kuhn, a scientist and a philosopher, scientists have failed to understand the development of a theory. He argues that we cannot start from nothing, instead a model as a reference or a source that can be developing into another condition. He opposed that a revolutionary science does not depend on the theory alone but also with accordance of models, scientific accomplishments in
Transcript

AGREE ON FORM-LINKED SOLUTIONS TOWARDS THE FUTUREDevelopment in arcitect!re a" can#e$ te perception o% arcitect" an$ $e"i#ner" &it re#ar$" to $e"i#n tra$ition an$ innovation' Te lin(a#e )et&een t&o e*i"tin# concept" i" no& )ein# re#ar$e$ an$ con"i$ere$ a" part o% a pro#re""ive an$ creative proce""' Ti" "+"tem o% tin(in# a" )een m!c in%l!ence$ even )+ non-arcitect!ral &riter" "!c a" Toma" K!n an$ Geor#e K!)ler' Livin# at te "ame perio$, )ot &riter" ave pro$!ce$ teir mo"t important &or(" &ic are te -Te Str!ct!re o% Scienti%ic Revol!tion". an$ -Te Sape o% Time. re"pectivel+' Even to!# )ot &riter" a$$re"" $i%%erent perception on $e"i#n $evelopment, te+ ave $eepl+ $i"co!r"e$ an$ a$$re""e$ te pro%o!n$ a"pect" an$ relation"ip o% tra$ition, innovationan$ can#e' In te article, Toma" K!n a" %oc!"e$ on te concept o% -/ara$i#m.' To!#, te a!tor o% te article a" a""e""e$ i" &or( an$ a" )een certain tat neiter o% K!n0" (e+ concept" an$ $e%inition o% para$i#m i" clearl+ $e%ine$, t!" va#!e an$ can lea$ to mi"!n$er"tan$in#' To clearl+ interpret i" i$ea, Mar#aret Ma"terman, &rote in er paper namel+ -Te Nat!re o% /ara$i#m, tat "e a" %o!n$ t&ent+ one $i%%erent !"eo% term in K!n0" &or( an$ it can )e cate#ori1e$ into tree )a"ic i$ea %rom te mo"t a)"tract to te mo"t concrete' Fir"t o% ti" i" te mo"t a)"tract, &erein te !"a#e o% /ara$i#m can )e $e%ine$ a" a "et o% )elie% or a m+t' At te ne*t level, te !"a#e o% para$i#m i" $e%ine$ a" a "et o% political in"tit!tion" or a 2!$icial $eci"ion' La"tl+, te mo"t concrete o% all, te para$i#m &a" !"e$ a" an act!al &or( or even a "et o% tool"'Tran"%ormation in perception an$ innovation i" one o% te emer#in# $evelopment" in arcitect!ral teorie"' Accor$in# to Toma" K!n, a "cienti"t an$ a pilo"oper, "cienti"t" ave %aile$ to !n$er"tan$ te $evelopment o% a teor+' He ar#!e" tat &e cannot "tart %rom notin#, in"tea$ a mo$el a" a re%erence or a "o!rce tat can )e $evelopin# into anoter con$ition' He oppo"e$ tat a revol!tionar+ "cience $oe" not $epen$ on te teor+ alone )!t al"o &it accor$ance o% mo$el", "cienti%ic accompli"ment" in "ome %orm o% e*periment" tat "erve$ a" in"piration in $i"coverin# teorie"'Intelater part o% tearticle, K!n"tarte$to!"etetermpara$i#m!n$erarti%act or con"tr!ct para$i#m"' In ti" pa"e, "cienti%ic re"earcer" &o "areacommon intellect!al %rame&or( calle$ a para$i#m or a $i"ciplinar+ matri*' He0" tr+in# toen#a#e!"in"olvin#p!11le"tro&n!p)+anomalie")et&een&at tepara$i#mpre$ict" an$ &at i" e*po"e$ )+ "t!$+ or e*perimentation' U"!all+, te anomalie" arere"olve$ eiter )+ incremental can#e" to te para$i#m or )+ %in$in# o)"ervational orinve"ti#ationalerror' Ti" i" to re%er not onl+ to te e*i"tin# "cienti%ic acievement a"$e"cri)e$, )!t to te &ole #ro!p o% meto$", pro)lem", teoretical pilo"op+,metap+"ical a""!mption", concept", an$ eval!ative principle" tat are pre"ent to "ome$e#ree or oter in an e*emplar' In te relation to te principle, te !"e o% "!c mo$el"are applie$ to )e a)le to prove te "+"tem' He al"o trie" to involve te $i"ciplinar+matri* tat i" %i*e$, permittin# te emer#in# #eneration o% p!11le-"ol!tion", &erea" in arevol!tion o% "cience, te $i"ciplinar+ matri* #o tro!# variation", in or$er to allo& tere"!lt o% te more "erio!" incon"i"tent p!11le" tat $i"t!r)e$ te prece$in# perio$ o%normal "cience' Ti" "tr!ct!re con"tit!te" te %!n$amental a""!mption" o% te $i"ciplinea)o!t o& re"earc in tat manner "o!l$ )e con$!cte$ a" &ell a" &at con"tit!te" a#oo$"cienti%ic e*planation'We )elieveto K!n&erein e "tate$ tatte "en"eo%para$i#m a" a $i"ciplinar+ matri* i" le"" %!n$amental tat te "en"e o% para$i#m i" 2!"te*emplar' E*emplar &ic i" )a"icall+ $e%ine" )+ e*ample te element" in te%rame&or( tat con"tit!te" te $i"ciplinar+ matri*'Te pro)lemi", can K!n0" para$i#m" elp !" to !n$er"tan$ "cienti%ic$evelopment3 We concl!$e tat K!n a$ !"e$ te &or$ /ara$i#m at lea"t t&ent+-"i*$i%%erent &a+"'K!n trie$ to "impli%+ or ma(e clear ti" in i" a$$en$!m an$ tal(e$ o% a$i"ciplinar+ matri*'Te matri* al"o implicate$ a""!rance to a metap+"ical mo$el, one&ic come" %rom "omeplace oter tan $irect o)"ervation o% te !manit+'A "econ$4!alit+ o% a matri* tat &a" $i"c!""e$ clearl+ i" "are$ val!e" "!c a" to"e !"e$ tocritic pre$iction"'Tir$l+, K!n "ai$ tat te para$i#m a" comm!nal e*ample &a" temo"t ori#inal an$lea"t !n$er"too$a"pect o% i")oo(' He"!)"tit!te"te&or$5e*emplar"0 in te a$$en$!m, an$ e*plain" tem a" "ort o% "!pport e*ample or i""!e"tat a "t!$ent learn" in or$er to #o on an$ ma(e %!rter relation"ip", )eca!"e e can"ee a ne& pro)lem a" li(e a pro)lem alrea$+ enco!ntere$' E*emplar" #ive "t!$ent"temean"to!n$er"tan$a-time-te"te$an$#ro!p-licen"e$&a+o% "eein#.' Te$i"ciplinar+ matri*, a(a para$i#m, i" te total o% a $i"cipline, o% a "cienti%ic comm!nit+'We can "ee tat K!n0" $i"ciplinar+ matri* ma(e" "en"e to lin(e$ "ol!tion" in tecom)ination o% tra$itionan$ innovation,a" te para$i#m or $i"ciplinar+ matri*, K!nre2ecte$ te &a+ revol!tion &a" perceive$, e claim" tat normal "cience i" "!cce""%!lin ma(in# $evelopment i% tere i" a "tron# commitment or en#a#ement in te relevant"cienti%ic comm!nit+, teir "are" teoretical )elie%", val!e", in"tr!ment" an$tecni4!e", an$ even metap+"ic"' It i" li(e o& te Intram!ro", Manila a$apt" to tepre"ent' Ho&it emer#eit"arcitect!retro!#te$eca$e' 6ein#te&alle$cit+,Intram!ro" i" (no&n %or te cla""ic arcitect!ral %eat!re" o% it" "tr!ct!re"' 6ein# omeo% te m!"e!m", cla""ical c!rce" an$ re"ta!rant", Intram!ro" i" (no&n a" one o% teerita#e "ite" i% te co!ntr+' Te &alle$ cit+ contin!e" to $evelop )!t "till carrie" &it itte "tor+ o% te pa"t' Havin# mo$ern )!il$in# &it incorporatin# te cla""ical %eat!re"tat elp it )len$ &it te "!rro!n$in#"' It i" one o% te )e"t e*ample" in K!n0" &a+ o%"eein#revol!tionorinnovation&ereinit a#ree"tat inor$ertoavea"!cce""%!linnovation, one m!"t loo( or ta(e con"i$eration &at i" in te pa"t or te tra$ition a" it i"te one &o "ape$ an$ mol$e$ &at no& e*i"t", +o! 2!"t a$$ anoter %eat!re to it tean$ root o% &ere it came %rom i" "till tere "omeo& "till relevant to &at e*i"t )e%ore'Accor$in# to 7o+ce 6ro$"(+, a contin!in# element or teor+ %ollo&" te )eavior o% acertain principle &ere it lea$" to can#e in perception, )elie%" an$ (no&le$#e, a%ter!n$er#oin# can#e", te contin!in# element "top" &erein $i"contin!it+ ta(e" place' In$e"i#nin#an$plannin#in Arcitect!re,proce""i"am!"t e"peciall+iti"a)roa$%iel$' /ara$i#m"pla+ an importantrole in comin# !p &it$e"i#n"ol!tion"%orarcitect!re'Oter prominent arcitect" li(e Le 8or)!"ier, /ilip 7on"on, Mie" 9an $er Roe,Eero Saarinen an$ oter" e*ploite$ tra$itional perception a" te+ !tili1e$ teircompo"ition" in )!il$in# "tr!ct!re"' So ten I, po"itivel+ corre"pon$ on teir )elie%" a"te+ appl+ tra$itional i$ea" in mo$ellin# a )!il$in# &ere te+ "o&e$ alle#iance' Forin"tance, Le 8or)!"ier !"e$ /alla$ian prece$ent", )e"i$e", te Mo$!lor' Mie" van $erRoe &a" in %avo!r o% /alla$ian centri"m an$ oter neo-cla""ical e*pre""ion" o% "taticor$er' Wile /ilip 7on"on, Eero Saarinen an$ oter" al"o contri)!te$ e*emplar" tat%ollo&e$ te t&o ma"ter", %irml+ e"ta)li"in# te no& %amiliar International St+le' T!",te"e &ell-(no&n arcitect", a" &e o)"erve$,applie$ ne& per"pective" an$ i$ea" increatin# tra$itional "tr!ct!re" %or !" to vi"!ali1e ne& appearance" an$ e*pre""ion"'Tere%ore, &e certainl+ a#ree tat com)inin# tra$ition an$ innovation &o!l$ )e acreative proce"" tat &o!l$ contri)!te a lot in o!r %!t!re' Some arcitect" no&a$a+"contin!all+ to appl+ "!c meto$ "o&in# te com)ination o% tra$itional an$ innovativearcitect!re'For in"tance, Arc' Franci"coMano"a,&o!"e"ti""imilar meto$o% arcitect!re'From i" Filipino in"pire$ arcitect!ral $e"i#n",e "o&" tat com)inin# tra$itional an$innovative arcitect!re can )rin# a )ri#t %!t!reontearcitect!ral$e"i#n" inte/ilippine"'Inconcl!"ion, ti"meto$pro$!ce"$i%%erentan$ne&e*pre""ionino!r vi"ion' T!", ti"meto$ i" con"i$ere$ a" te a)"tract o% te pa"tan$ (no&n a" te mo"t "!cce""%!l incontemporar+ arcitect!re' 6+ loo(in# at te%i#!re" on te le%t, "trate#icall+ incorporatin# tetra$itional arcitect!re &it te mo$ern "t+lecan )e e""ential to a certain arcitect!ral "t+le'One#reat e*amplei"teinnovation%romtetra$itionaltukodor $ia#onal "tr!t" to teMano"a0" "i#nat!re an#le$ &in$o&"' An#le$&in$o&" are #reat a$aptation to te tropicalenvironment %or it $enie" e*ce""ive "!nli#t an$eat +et "till promote" a $ecent amo!nt o%$a+li#t' An#le$&in$o&"areimplemente$onmo"t o% Mano"a0" pro2ect" li(e te :lan# Lanean$te8ampanillaLane&ic)otpro2ect"mo$ern"t+le arcitect!re'Wea#reetat K!na$apte$$i"ciplinar+matri*&ic"a+"tat tra$itionan$innovationa"it"common#ro!n$, commoni$ea&ill revolve$tolin(e$"ol!tion"'Figure 1: Traditional tukod used on early Philippine architectureFigure 2: Manosa reinvented the tukod for windows as diagonal struts and applied it tohis signature angled windows to prevent directed sunlight on coming inTra$itional para$i#m"areli(epa"t, +o!cannot #oon&ittepre"ent an$%!t!re&ito!t (no&in# te pa"t' Same #oe" &it te tra$ition' At "ome point, +o! &ill nee$ toloo( at te "tan$ar$ a$ )a"i" i% te pa"t para$i#m"; Tra$ition in te oter an$, &en+o! #et a para$i#m %rom te tra$ition an$ #et a para$i#m %rom innovation 5ne&0 i$ea"tenpro)lem"olvin#an$"ol!tion"&ill appearnat!rall+an$it &ill pro$!cem!ltiplei$ea"' Innovation &ill al&a+" )e in%l!ence$ )+ tra$ition' -Te ne& para$i#m retain" m!c o% &at &a" !"e%!l in te ol$ one, )!t "et" it&itin a )roa$er an$ more incl!"ive %rame&or(.' 7!"t loo(in# at contemporar+arcitect!re, o& arcitect" $e"i#ne$ teir )!il$in#" &a" in%l!ence$ )+ te le#en$rie"'Ho& teir &in$o&" loo( li(e an$ o& teir plan" are or#ani1e$'DISAGREE ON FORM-LINKED SOLUTIONS TOWARDS THE FUTURETe F!t!re< Te -"olve-it-all. mi"conception o% Innovation" an$ Tra$ition" -The best way to predict the future is to design it.. Ti" i" a "tatement %rom te mo$erni"t arcitect, 6!c(min"ter F!ller' He i" a "!cce""%!l planner in te conte*t o% a$$in# $e%inition an$ at te "ame time, re$e%inin# te e""ence o% arcitect!re, )ot in "apin# man an$ te "ociet+ tro!# %orm-lin(e$ "ol!tion" tat innovate i" approac in$e"i#nin# "pace"' Form-lin(e$ "ol!tion" are )a"icall+ innovative an$ %orm-)a"e$ i$ea" tat aim" to "olve pro)lem" an$ i""!e" tat ari"e" in te mo$ern conte*t' Te concept o% "!c "ol!tion" emplo+" can#e on te "tr!ct!re o% te "ol!tion it"el% in or$er to provi$e a ne& per"pective in a$$re""in# ne& pro)lem"' Several teorie" an$ propo"ition" ave )een $evelope$ in or$er to $e%ine an$ "cr!tini1e te concept o% innovation an$ it" implication" to&ar$" %o"terin# comm!nal an$ "ocietal "ta)ilit+' Ho&ever "everal ar#!ment" are critical eno!# to pro$!ce ontolo#ical "tatement" tat "arpl+ in%l!ence" te perception o% innovation in te )!ilt environment' On te oter an$, te role o% tra$ition i" inar#!a)l+ a critical $eterminant in in$icatin# te approac o% te "ol!tion in te conte*t o% te "en"itivit+ an$ pre"ervin# te c!lt!re an$ genus loci o% te place' It i" a con"i$eration e"peciall+ on innovation re#ar$in# in$!"triali1ation, &ere tra$ition &ill al&a+" )e a%%ecte$' Te relation"ip )et&een tra$ition an$ innovation are vital component" tat &ill $etermine te "tr!ct!re o% te %!t!re' Toma" K!n an$ Geor#e K!)ler, amon# oter pilo"oper" an$ teori"t, ave ma$e an impactin ti" pro"pect' Te+ ave "et te pioneerin# $e%inition o% &at it ta(e" %or an innovation to appen' 6!t re#ar$le"" o% teir cre$i)ilit+, $oe" tra$ition an$ innovation reall+ #ive" )irt o% a "!"taina)le %!t!re or it0" 2!"t a %allacio!" mi"conception in or$er to ma(e an e*c!"a)le acco!nt to create "ometin# ne& an$ prove te $e"i#ner0" pro%icienc+ in i" %iel$ o% e*perti"e3 Doe" innovation in$!ce "en"itivit+ to te tra$ition3 I" te %!t!re reall+ $e%ine$ )+ te"e t&o component"3 Toma" K!n, a pilo"oper $!rin# te mo$ern perio$, a" ma$e a controver"+ in i" )oo(, The Structure of Scientific Revolution' He claim" tat innovation" are pro$!ce$ tro!# te anomalie" tat lie" on te pre"ent para$i#m' I% &e0ll %ollo& te po"t!late o% imper%ection" o% ever+ "ol!tion an$ it" ina)ilit+ to provi$e all te an"&er", &e can "a+ tat innovation" &ill al&a+" )e perpet!al an$ in$e%inite in it" pa"e, t!" elpin# to "olve e*i"tin# pro)lem" an$ at te "ame time, pro$!ce ne& pro)lem"' In K!n0" point o% vie&, te main mi"conception tat planner" an$ "cienti"t come" into, i" te total reliance on teorie" an$ not cr!ciall+ loo(in# on it" ori#in" an$ %ail!re to $evelop concrete analo#ie"' Ti" intellect!al $epen$ence lea$" to va#!e innovation" an$ pro$!ce" more con%lict"' Form-lin(e$ "ol!tion" o!t o% $epen$ence on teorie" &ill never )e "en"i)le eno!# to e%%icientl+ "olve te pre"ent i""!e"' I% &e nee$ to #o )ac( to o!r ori#in", ten &e can ave an a""!mption on te concept o% tra$ition a" o!r prime "o!rce o% innovation' Tra$ition i" te concept o% ori#inalit+ an$ pec!liarit+ o% a certain comm!nit+ tat "et" it apart %rom oter comm!nitie"' It i" o%ten caracteri1e$ )+ a $i"tinct c!lt!re an$ it i" "ape$ )+ te "it!ation" tat te comm!nit+ #et" involve$ over time' I% te"e tra$ition" &ill )e te )a"i"o% o!r mo$el, tere i" a #reater pro)a)ilit+ tat innovation" an$ %orm-lin(e$ "ol!tion" &o!l$ ave it" more tan#i)le "o!rce o% cre$i)ilit+' Moreover, #iven te $i%%erent p+"ical "ite an$ con$itional $i%%erence", te"e tra$ition" &o!l$ al"o ave certain circ!m"tance" =$!rin# to"e time"> tat "peci%icall+ "ape$ te %rame&or( o% te tra$ition it"el%' I% &e &o!l$ never )e certain o% to"e circ!m"tance", ten &e &ill never ave a per%ect analo#+ to $evelop t!", &e &ill never ave te mo"t concrete "ol!tion" to ever+ pro)lem"' I% ti" concept ol$" tr!e to ever+tin#, ten innovation" an$ con%lict" &ill )e perpet!al an$ the future will never become the future that we might expect.One e*ample i" te pre"ent "it!ation o% Intram!ro"'8ent!r+-ol$ &all" ma+ not ave $ilapi$ate$ $!e to pre"ervation )+ te a$mini"tration )!t it $oe"n0t elp to te prevalence o% !r)an "pra&l in"i$e te i"toric $i"trict' Te innovation tat a" )een $one to$a+ i" te renovation an$ retro%ittin# o% te neo-i"panic )!il$in#" in"i$e intram!ro"' On te oter an$, ti" priorit+ a" le%t te a$mini"tration to i#nore te !r)an re"i$ential conte*t an$ te i"toric inte#rit+ o% intram!ro"' 6ein# "en"i)le to tra$ition $oe" not totall+ incorporate a "en"i)le "ol!tion' Te $i"trict0" "it!ation onl+ concern" te tan#i)le an$ concrete e*emplar" )+ &ic te vie&er" an$ !"er" )ene%it", !"in# te pla"ter" an$ oter arcitect!ral "(in" to $evelop a %ra!$ %ronta#e to ma(e i"toric $i"trict, i"toric' F!rtermore, anoter concept ave in%l!ence$ on o!r perception on innovation' Te concept o% K!)leron innovation lie" on it" $+namic mo$el o% can#e an$ mo$i%ication o% %orm' He interpret" tat innovation i" $!e to can#e in pattern, t!" pro$!cin# a ne& one' Ti" i" $evelope$ tro!# $ri%t, noi"e, an$?or inter%erence' In K!)ler0" point o% vie& , mo$i%+in# "ometin# &ill event!all+ can#e it0" "tr!ct!ral con%i#!ration to!# it $oe"n0t remove te %act tat te ori#in0" core i" "till tere' Ti" propo"ition &a" oppo"e$ )+ 7o+ce 6ro$"(+, &o "tate" tat innovation i" te #ra$!al revealin# a" "ta+in# clo"e in revealin# te real pattern , an$ not nece""aril+ creatin# a ne& pattern , &ic $i"place" te ol$' Over time, "e $evelope$ a concept &ic oppo"e$ K!)ler0" point o% vie&' Se tran"late$ K!)ler0" opinion into te i$ea o% contin!it+ an$ $i"contin!it+' For 6ro$"(+, contin!it+ an$ $i"contin!it+ are nat!ral penomena tat occ!rin te )!ilt an$ nat!ral environment' Ever+ pro)lem tri##er" te nee$ %or a ne& "ol!tion tat in te lon# r!n , &ill pro$!ce %!t!re con%lict"' In ti" lo#ical "en"e, te concept o% caine$ reaction pro$!ce" "ocietal in"ta)ilit+' One e*ample on ti" concept i" )e"t ill!"trate$ on te con"ec!tive pattern" on Marco"ian 6r!tali"m arcitect!ral "t+le an$ te 9ernac!lar Filipino concept )+ oter arcitect" "!c a" Mano"a' D!rin# te @ABC", 6r!tali"t )!il$in#" $ominate" te /ilippine", creatin# a "tron# caracter on te nationalconte*t' Ti" innovation "olve" te concern on te lac( o% i$entit+ o% Filipino arcitect!re' S!c arcitect!ral "t+le tat &a" applie$ on convention center" al"o $evelope$ a "en"e o% "ocial involvement o% Filipino" on te Glo)al /lat%orm , #ainin# m!ltiple inve"tor" $!rin# tat time' 6!t i$entit+ i" not 2!"t te pro)lem $!rin# tat time' On te DCt cent!r+, 8limate can#e )e#an to "pro!t a" an alarm %or $e"i#ner" an$ planner" ali(e to alter teir pro#rammatic "ol!tion to&ar$" arcitect!ral innovation' Ti" ne& pro)lem $i"contin!e$ te !"e o% )r!tali"t arcitect!re )!t it $oe"n0t$i"place te importance an$ te contri)!tion o% te ra& concrete )!il$in#" to&ar$" arcitect!ral $i"tinction an$ innovation' Until to$a+, vernac!lar an$ "!"taina)le arcitect!re i" "till prevalent "ince te i""!e on climate can#e i" not +et re"olve$' I% &e tr+ to %ollo& 7o+ce 6ro$"(+0" concept o% can#e' Te tr!e e""ence o% arcitect!ral pattern i" adaptation. Re#ar$le"" o% &at &e &ant to $o a" $e"i#ner", &e0ll al&a+" $e"i#n to a$apt an$ to re"pon$ to te nee$" o% te !"er" an$ )roa$l+, o% te "ociet+' In a n!t"ell, innovation an$ tra$ition "i#ni%icantl+ contri)!te to te $evelopment o% "ol!tion to te pro)lem" in te "ociet+ )!t on te conte*t o% %!t!re, te"e t&o component" al"o pla+ a role in pro$!cin# ne& pro)lem", t!" provi$in# !" a $i%%erent variation o% -%!t!re.' I% te %!t!re tat &e are pertainin# i" avin# te Utopian i$eolo#+ o% a per%ect "ociet+, it &ill never come tr!e' Ti" concept ol$" tr!e on all tin#", #iven te caine$ reaction" amon# "it!ation" tat pro$!ce$ te pre"ent "ociet+' Em)racin# te "ocietal con$ition an$ te !n$erl+in# pro)lem" i" te (e+ in or$er to appreciate te %!t!re' Te %!t!re tat &e "o!l$ e*pect m!"t not )e "ometin# tat0" %ree %rom pro)lem )!t rater, it "o!l$ )e "ometin# &ere innovation, tra$ition , an$ c!lt!re &ill learn to live to#eter, perpet!all+ re"olvin# te nat!ral $i"or$er tat e*i"t"'


Recommended