Agrometeorological Monitoring Agrometeorological Monitoring and Forecasts for Pest and and Forecasts for Pest and

Disease ControlDisease Control

Simone Orlandini

Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science

University of Florence

International Workshop on Addressing the Livelihood Crisis of FarmersBelo Horizonte, Brazil, 12-14 July 2010

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

BackgroundBackground

Widening of biological

knowledge

BackgroundBackground

Development of computer science and

telecommuncations

Most affected regions: tropics and developing Countries

Causes:

o Lack of technologies

o Crop successions

o High temperatures

o Possibility to have more than one cycle per year

Area Crop losses (%)

Europe 25

Oceania 28

North and central America

29

URSS e China 30

South America 33

Africa 42

Asia 43

BackgroundBackground

Constant level of crop losses

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

anni 50 anni 60-70 oggi

insetti malattie infestantipest disease

weed

1960-19701950 current

High level of pesticide utilisation

BackgroundBackground

NeedsNeeds of information of information

o There is the need of information disseminated to the growers to rationalise crop protection.

o Usually farmers carry out their decision in condition of high risk and uncertainty.

o The lack of knowledge increases the level of risk in farm management, and farmers have to increase the quantity of chemical and energy inputs, without solving the problems.

o A way to help growers during their activity is represented by the acquisition of high quality elaborated information, so reducing decision making uncertainty minimising the use of chemical and energy inputs.

Agrometeorological modelling can be the suitable tool Agrometeorological modelling can be the suitable tool

to provide this informationto provide this information

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

Field stationsField stations

Leaf Leaf wetness wetness sensorssensors

Remote sensing Remote sensing – input data– input data

maps of downy maps of downy mildew infectionmildew infection

1.00E+00

1.00E+01

1.00E+02

1.00E+03

1.00E+04

1.00E+05

1.00E+06

1.00E+07

1.00E+08

1.00E+09

1.00E+10

06.0

5.

11.0

5.

16.0

5.

21.0

5.

26.0

5.

31.0

5.

05.0

6.

10.0

6.

15.0

6.

20.0

6.

25.0

6.

30.0

6.

05.0

7.

10.0

7.

15.0

7.

measured LW

dropben LW

sweb LW

control LW

Radar (RAINFALL)

Epidemiological model

Ground stations

LWD model

Remote sensing Remote sensing – identification of symptoms – identification of symptoms on crop canopies using multispectral imageson crop canopies using multispectral images

Numerical weather Numerical weather modelsmodels

Seasonal forecastSeasonal forecast

GISGIS

Map of number of days for the outbreak of the current infection

Number of generation of Bactrocera oleae

Simulated impacts Simulated impacts of leaf-damaging of leaf-damaging

pest infestation on pest infestation on maize yield at maize yield at

regional scale (30-regional scale (30-arcminute grids in arcminute grids in

Tanzania). Leaf Tanzania). Leaf damages was damages was implemented implemented

through a leaf area through a leaf area coupling point in coupling point in

the the DSSAT model DSSAT model

www.regional.org.au

Crop modelsCrop models

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

Mechanistic Mechanistic EmpiricalEmpirical

http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu

Cornell University in Geneva, New York

Other approaches: Other approaches: fuzzy, neural networkfuzzy, neural network

fuzzy fuzzy inferenceinference

de-de-fuzzificatifuzzificati

ononyes yes or or nono

TTRHRH

fuzzificatiofuzzificationn

fuzzificatiofuzzificationn

base of base of rulesrules

Quantitative Quantitative informationinformationQualitative Qualitative informationinformation

&&

R. D. Magarey, T. B. Sutton, and C. L. ThayerDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27696..

Main modelsMain models

Coltura Malat. Mod.ABETE 3 3AGRUMI 1 1AVENA 2 2AVOCADO 1 1BANANA 2 4BARBABIET. 2 2BEGONIA 1 1CACAO 1 1CAFFÈ 1 1CANNA ZUC. 1 1CAROTA 2 2CASTAGNO 1 1CAUCCIÙ’ 2 3CAVOLO 2 3CEREALI 4 6CILIEGIO 2 2CIPOLLA 2 2COCOMERO 1 1COTICO ERB. 1 1COTONE 3 4CRESCIONE 1 1DUGLASIA 1 1FAGIOLO 4 4FRAGOLA 4 5GINEPRO 1 1GIRASOLE 2 2WHEAT 10 58LUPPOLO 1 3

Coltura Malat. Mod.MAIS 4 4MANDORLO 1 1MANGO 1 1MEDICA 2 3APPLE 4 18MELONE 1 1PEANUT 5 13NOCCIOLO 1 1OLMO 1 1BARLEY 5 13POTATO 4 21PESCO 1 1PINO 4 4PIOPPO 3 3PISELLO 1 1POMODORO 4 6QUERCIA 1 1RAPA 2 4RICE 4 17SEDANO 1 1SEGALE 1 1SOIA 5 9SORGO 7 7SPINACI 1 1SUSINO 1 1TABACCO 2 2TRIFOGLIO 1 1GRAPEVINE 4 17

Source: Erick D. DeWolf and Scott A. Isard, 2007. Disease Cycle Approach to Plant Disease PredictionAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2007. 45:203–20

Year of formulationYear of formulation

ContinentContinent

0

10

20

30

40

50E

ur.

Asi

a

Afr

ica

S. A

m.

N. A

m.

Oce

ania

Input example: Plasmopara viticola Input example: Plasmopara viticola simulation modelssimulation models

Type Model Temp. Precip. RH LWDGoidanich G GRule of 3 10 G GDM CAST O O O OEPI Winter M 10 G

Empirical EPI Summer G 3 O dPOM GPCOP G GDyonis G 3 O dMILVIT 3 O 3 OVINEMILD O O O

O d O d O dMechanistic 15 MI n 15 MI n 15 MI n

Freiburg O O O OPLASMO O O O O

Rules

PRO O

Output example: Output example: Plasmopara Plasmopara

viticolaviticolasimulation simulation

modelsmodels

Model OutputGoidanich SINGLE INFORMATIONReg. 3 10dm CAST INFECTION POTENTIALEPI Inv.EPI Est.POMPCOPDyonisMILVIT SPECIFIC BIOLOGICAL ANDVinemild EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATAPROFreiburgPLASMODM sim.

Example of variables included into different kinds of modelsExample of variables included into different kinds of models

L. M. Contreras-Medina, I. Torres-Pacheco, R. G. Guevara-González, R. J. Romero-Troncoso, I. R. Terol-Villalobos, R. A. Osornio-Rios, 2009. Mathematical modeling tendencies in plant pathology. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (25), pp. 7399-7408

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

Condition of applicationCondition of application

o Climatic classification

o Future climatic scenario for climate change and variability analysis

o Field monitoring and forecast for crop protection

Climatic Climatic classificationclassification

Potato late blight riskPotato late blight risk

Climatic risk for potato late blight in the Andes region of Venezuela (Beatriz Ibet Lozada Garcia; Paulo Cesar Sentelhas; Luciano Roberto Tapia; Gerd Sparovek, 2008)

Predicted severity of phoma stem Predicted severity of phoma stem canker (L. maculans) at harvest canker (L. maculans) at harvest (Sc) on winter oilseed rape crops.(Sc) on winter oilseed rape crops.

a)1960-1990

d) 2050 LO

c)2020 HI

b)2020 LO

e) 2050 HI

Zhou et al. 1999)

Climate change Climate change impactimpact

Probable number of Probable number of generations of leaf generations of leaf miner (Leucoptera miner (Leucoptera coffeella) on coffee coffeella) on coffee

plant in Brazilplant in Brazil

Source: Ghini R. et al., 2008. Risk analysis of climate change on coffee nematodes and leaf miner in Brazil. Pesq. agropec. bras. vol.43  n.2.

To treatTo treat

Not to treatNot to treat

Field monitoring and forecast for crop Field monitoring and forecast for crop protectionprotection

Information utilisation Information utilisation

For using information obtained by models or by decision making systems in order to define the field treatment epochs, different aspects have to be highlighted

 Necessary to treat when

   the pathogen is present

   the crop is susceptible

   the treatment is efficacious

 To avoid treatments

   in advance, for losses of efficacy due to the product degradation and to the growth of plants

   late, for losses of efficacy due to a too developed infective process

 Factors to consider

   character of the farmer

   need to have all the information concerning the disease and the crop

   position of the threshold of action and damage

   application with strategic or tactical aims

State Disease Crop Pathogen Benefit

UK Stem canker, light leaf spot

oil rape Leptosphaeria maculansPyrenopeziza brassicae

increase average yields by up to 0.5 t/ha (equivalent to £75/ha or £15 million/annum if benefits occur on 200,000ha)

1

Virginia (USA)

leaf spot peanut growers

Cercospora arachidicola 1987-1990: input costs reduced by 33% or $57 per ha1990-1995: input costs reduced by 43% or $66 per ha

2

Italy Grapevine downy mildew

grapevine Plasmopara viticola The threshold for an economical convenience in the adoption of the agrometeorological system is about 6 ha.

3

Florida Brown spot citrus Alternaria alternata 4

1. Dr Peter Gladders, ADAS Boxworth, Cambridge. LK0944: Validation of disease models in PASSWORD integrated decision support for pests and diseases in oilseed rape. HGCA conference 2004: Managing soil and roots for profitable production

2. Phipps PM, Deck SH,Walker DR. 1997.Weather-based crop and disease advisories for peanuts in Virginia. Plant Dis. 81:236–443. L. Massetti, A. Dalla Marta and S. Orlandini, Preliminary economic evaluation of an agrometeorological system for Plasmopara viticola infections management.4. Alka Bhatia, P. D. Roberts, L. W. Timmer, 2003. Evaluation of the Alter-Rater Model for Timing of Fungicide Applications for Control of Alternaria Brown Spot of

Citrus. Plant Disease / September 2003.

Model application economic benefitsModel application economic benefits

Costs and benefits of Costs and benefits of Alter-Rater Model Alter-Rater Model

Benefits from the Benefits from the IPM impact IPM impact

studiesstudies

Economic Impacts of Integrated Pest Management in Developing Countries:Evidence from the IPM CRSPTatjana HristovskaThesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009

Other benefitsOther benefits

reduction of chemical inputs in the ecosystemsoil fertility conservationsmaller amount of chemical residuals in food work quality improvementreduction in the development of resistant formssafeguarding of natural predatoryreduction of new diseases

ImplementationImplementation of the model of the modelTables for manual calculations

Simplicity of application, difficulty to obtain information for an efficacious use

Electronic plant stations

Collocation in field, complete automation, imprecise results, frequent damages

Computer

Rapidity of intervention (tactic), possibility to analyse past conditions, possible simulation with future scenarios (strategic), automatic collection of data, use for different aims, precision of results

Manual calculation: Mills table (apple scab)Manual calculation: Mills table (apple scab)

LEAF WETNESS HOURSTemperature Light Medium Severe

8 18 23 349 15.5 20.5 30

10 12.5 19 2811 11.5 17 2612 10.5 16 2413 10 14 22.514 9.5 13 2115 9 12.5 2016 9 12.5 1917 9 12.5 1818 9 12.5 1819 9 12.5 1820 9 12.5 1821 9 12.5 1822 9 12.5 1823 9 12.5 1824 9.5 12.5 1925 10.5 14 21

Electronic Electronic plant plant

stationstation

Personal computer and Personal computer and network of network of

meteorological sensors meteorological sensors and stationsand stations

OutlineOutline

o Background

o Input data

o Models for crop protection

o Use and application

o Dissemination of information

Conditions of applicationConditions of application

Farm: in this case the model is applied directly by farmers, with evident benefits in the evaluation of real epidemiological condition and microclimate evaluation. On the other hand, the management of the simulations and the updating of the systems represent big obstacles.

Territory: it is probably preferable because it allows a better management and updating of the system. This solution requires the application of suitable methods for the information dissemination among the users.

Information dissemination: the bulletinsInformation dissemination: the bulletins

o Advises and information to the users can be disseminated by using: personal contact, newspaper and magazines, radio and television, videotel, televideo, telefax, mail, phone, INTERNET, SMS.

 

Mobile phone Mobile phone

From Omondi Lwande and Muchemi Lawrence (2008)

Powdery mildew Powdery mildew riskrisk

http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/pmildew/

Veneto (Italy) – infection rainfall mapVeneto (Italy) – infection rainfall map

www.mausam.gov

In Florida AgroClimate.org provides a set of tools to help producers reduce risks associated with climate variability.

In particular, the Strawberry Diseases Tool can help you with recommendations for timing fungicide applications for Anthracnose and Botrytis fruit rot.

Maps of light leaf spot forecast Maps of light leaf spot forecast http://www.rothamsted.bbsrc.ac.ukhttp://www.rothamsted.bbsrc.ac.uk

Lupin bean yellow mosaic virus Lupin bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) Forecast(BYMV) Forecast

www.syngenta-crop.co.uk/brassica-alert.aspx

Syngenta Crop Syngenta Crop Protection UK LtdProtection UK Ltd

Growers and agronomists already registered on the Syngenta website will automatically have free access to Brassica Alert

Agrometeorological Monitoring Agrometeorological Monitoring and Forecasts for Pest and and Forecasts for Pest and

Disease ControlDisease Control

Simone Orlandini

Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science

University of FlorenceInternational Workshop on Addressing the Livelihood Crisis of Farmers

Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 12-14 July 2010

Thank you for your attention!!!

Thank you for your attention!!!