AIOTI WG3 IoT Standardisation
Public session co-located with IoT Week Lisboa http://iot-week.eu/research-day/#aiot-wg3-iot-standarisation-sdo
16 June 2015 14:00 – 17:20 Chair ETSI Patrick GUILLEMIN
and Alternate Chair Schneider Electric Jean-Pierre DESBENOIT 1
• AIOTI Introduction from the EC Rolff RIEMENSCHNEIDER
• AIOTI WG3 introduction , survey and status report - Patrick Guillemin
• AIOTI WG1 (IERC) proposal on IoT Semantic Interoperability - Philippe Cousin EGM
• IPSO Alliance on behalf of Ericsson / Jaime Jiménez (excused)
• Huawei "AIOTI worldwide cooperation with IoT SDOs and Alliances, including China“ - Georgios Karagiannis
• oneM2M, ETSI TC SmartM2M – Omar Elloumi
• ITU-T IoT activities “pitch” – Marco Carugi
• W3C Web of Things – on behalf of Dave Raggett (excused)
• ISO/IEC JTC1 WG10 “Internet of Things” - Sangkeun Yoo
• IEEE-SA P2413 presentation - Siemens Juergen Heiles
• AIOTI WG4 on Policy collaboration with WG3
• IoT-Forum view – Sebastien Ziegler
• FIWARE “Context Management. FIWARE & IoT” - Carlos Ralli Ucendo, Telefonica –
• IoT Open source platforms - Dr. Martín Serrano
• Panel discussion Q/A 2
IoT Definition http://www.internet-of-things-
research.eu/about_iot.htm
The IERC definition states that IoT is
"A dynamic global network infrastructure with self-configuring capabilities based on standard and interoperable communication protocols where physical and virtual “things” have identities, physical attributes, and virtual personalities and use intelligent interfaces, and are seamlessly integrated into the information network.".
4
Alliance for Internet Of Things Innovation • Informal entity created by the EC, 25/03/2015 based
on voluntary participation, made of 11 WG
5
AIOTI WG3 IoT Week sessions scope The ambitious goal of the AIOTI WG3 session on 16 June 2015 is
to deliver to the EC an early set of recommendations for IoT standardization framework for the WP2016-2017 IoT LSP call.
This will be provided from the AIOTI survey conducted amongst the AIOTI members. The survey will be enriched with the executive summary from SDO on available IoT standardization frameworks (landscape gaps) –at least as already provided to IERC
How AIOTI WG3 stakeholders propose to enable interoperability within the ‘verticals’ (WG5->WG11) and horizontally like in Smart Cities use cases that include already many (but not all) of the IoT use cases, conducted so far in verticals sorted by ‘use cases’.
6
WG3: 37 Members (54 people) ABB,
AB.C,
Alcatel-Lucent,
ARM,
Blackberry,
Bosch,
Cisco,
CITC-EuraRFID,
CNIT,
DSPG,
DTC (UK),
Ericsson,
ETSI,
Gradiant,
Huawei,
IBM,
Ifinity,
IKEA,
Landis+Gyr,
Magillem,
Mandat International,
Nokia ,
ON Semiconductor
Orange,
ORGALIME,
OSRAM,
Philips,
SAMSUNG,
Schneider Electric,
Seed Labs,
Siemens,
SINTEF/IERC,
STmicroelectronics,
Telecom Italia,
Telefonica,
Texas Instrument,
Thales
7
37 Liaisons (59 people) IERC , IoT-Forum , OpenIoT/IERC, FIWARE
W3C , IETF (6TISCH), IRTF, ITU-T, CEN (TC 225),
CENELEC, CCMC, ETSI, (SmartM2M, IP6, DECT/ULE)
3GPP, GSMA, oneM2M,
ISO, IEC, ISO/IEC JTC1 WG10, ISO TC22 SC31 WG1/WG3
OASIS, OGC, IEEE-SA P2413,
OIC, IIC, IPSO Alliance, WWRF, ZigBee, BBF, MPI Alliance,
AIM, Platform Industry 4.0, VDI, ZVEI
SSCC-CG
...with informa contact points who are in the majority of the cases already member of AIOTI WG3, this is very useful !
Waiting : ULE Allaince,
GS1
To approach/confirm :
ANEC, IPv6 Forum,
NGMN, Hyper/CAT,
LoRa Alliance,
AllSeen Alliance,
8
To add… SmartMeter CG, Smart Energy Grid CG, ICT MSP, EIP-SCC, 5G PPP,
Eurocities, ICLEI, Open WSN, Universal Device Gateway, OMG, Cyber Security CG, GE
General Electric, Open Automotive Alliance, Intel IoT Solutions Alliance, EIP on Water,
EIP on Agricultural sustainability and Productivity, EIP active and healthy ageing, BIG
Data PPP, ECSEL, FoF-PPP, UPnP …
WG3 IoT Standardisation
• Initial AIOTI WG3 ToR : “This WG implies the mapping of existing IoT standards and gap analysis, as well as strategies and use cases to develop (semantic) interoperability”
• WG3 will not develop standards
• WG3 Action Plan for the next 6 months objectives :
– Qualify each other expectations,
– Define together a shared vision on IoT Standardisation objectives
– Discover what WG3 members are offering, allocate tasks & responsibilities 9
WG3 Survey http://goo.gl/forms/5RtlcuhsJN
19 answers / 37 - 12/06/15 1. Which SDOs are you working with or you consider highly
relevant for IoT? 2. Which Alliance/Consortium are you participating in or you
consider highly relevant for IoT? 3. What IoT Platform(s) are you supporting or you consider
highly relevant ? 4. What IoT Open source solutions are you using/supporting or
you consider highly relevant ? 5. What is your IoT (or AIOTI WG) domain of interest ? 6. What IoT Standard framework reference do you know, do
you know if any related gaps analysis exist (where/url)? 7. Comment this statement: “semantic interoperability is basic
pillar for AIOTI" and "there are other important interoperability aspects that we can address, for instance the data transport level interoperability" ?
10
WG3 Method • Be pragmatic, use as much as possible what exists already, ask
for active participation
• Survey (see after) for getting inputs from WG3 members representing various stakeholders
• Dedicated survey to the 30 liaisons because material already exists (standard landscape, use cases…) – e.g. IERC position paper on IoT Standardization
• Ask other AIOTI WGs about their needs/requests
• List of questions for the WG3 members to be addressed during calls and F2F meetings – We will use the results of the surveys as well as inputs from other
AIOTI WGs
– Take into account other current proposals (SSCC-CG, SEG-CG…)
• Build recommendations agreed by consensus 11
IoT LSP Landscape/mapping and Gap Analysis
Proposed focus/approach : Identify concrete IoT use cases with their associated existing standard framework check duplications? omissions? gaps? (already known)
Instead of just 'yet another IoT Landscape’ :
• list all known existing IoT Landscape studies/reports,
• see how the selected verticals are covered and integrated : crossing results with other WGs 5->11, let ‘s define how? and see how this could be expanded to more ‘verticals’
12
