+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space...

Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space...

Date post: 17-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: willis-osborne
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Impacts Powerful oxidant and respiratory irritant Damage to plants Global warming

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript

Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 Johnson Space Center Ozone (O 3 ) At ground-level in the air we breathe, ozone (smog) poses serious risks to human health. Ozone is produced by photochemical reaction of the precursors Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): VOC + NOx + Heat + Sunlight = Ozone Intense sunlight, warm temperatures, stagnant high-pressure weather systems, and low wind speeds cause ozone to accumulate in harmful amounts. Impacts Powerful oxidant and respiratory irritant Damage to plants Global warming VOC NOx VOC Source: US EPA Texas Nonattainment and Near Nonattainment Areas Ozone Non-attainment and Controls Trends in 8-hour ozone design values in Texas Texas Emission Reduction Plan (TERP) Texas Low Emission Diesel fuel standards Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Transportation control measures Emissions limits Emissions cap and trade markets What is Particulate Matter? U.S. DOE U.S. EPA Impacts increased rates of mortality, increased rates of respiratory disease, decreased visibility, damage to materials If the PM is acidic, acid deposition. Particle composition and size Health Effects Particles >10 m do not enter respiratory system Mouth breathers: 50% of PM2.5 deposit in the lungs Nasal breathers: 25% of PM2.5 deposit in the lungs Damage to respiratory organs % of particles between m penetrate into lungs and deposited there. PM 2.5 < 10 ug/m 3 (8/16/00)PM 2.5 = 15 ug/m 3 (8/7/00) PM 2.5 = 35 ug/m 3 (8/26/00) PM 2.5 = 20 ug/m 3 (8/24/00) PM 2.5 = 30 ug/m 3 (8/15/00)PM 2.5 = 25 ug/m 3 (8/25/00) Effects on Visibility Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Primary and Secondary PM Primary particles Secondary particles Why is PM 2.5 different from other pollutants? Key Players in PM 2.5 formation Transport of PM How long? PM10 particles can stay in the air for minutes or hours, while PM2.5 particles can stay in the air for days or weeks. The Dust of Africa at times makes up 50% of the breathable particles in Miami (July 16, 2003) The fires of Mexico (April 16, 2003) What distance? PM10 particles can travel as little as a hundred yards or as much as 30 miles. PM2.5 particles can go many hundreds of miles. Design values for annual PM2.5 at selected Texas monitors Two sites of concern: Houston Aldine (18% increase to 14.6 g/m3 from 2001 to 2006) Houston Clinton (33% increase to 16 g/m3 from 2001 to 2006) Data Types and Sources used in Air Quality and Exposure Research Ambient Monitoring Data EPA Air Quality System (AQS) AirData TCEQ CAMS data TAMIS Web Application TCEQ AutoGC Available upon request not on web yet. Ambient data from field studies e.g. TexAQS I and II, TRAMP, SHARP Meteorological Data Exposure Data from Field Studies e.g. RIOPA and HEATS Personal exposure, outdoor and indoor concentrations measured at residences during each visit Questionnaires Information concerning time and location of microenvironment where participants spent time during sampling Data Types and Sources National Air Toxics Assessments (NATA) Emissions Inventory data from TCEQ National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)TCEQ Emission Event Database Air Research Information Infrastructure (ARII): A Site for Houston Air Quality DataAir Exposure Research Online (AERO) Example: NATA estimates for benzene A sample ARII screen used in the analysis of ambient ethylene data in conjunction with trajectory and emissions data Trajectory for 9/1/2006 8pm Emission events detected in ARII and influenced the olefin concentrations Modeling Tools Source Models: ISCST3 CALPUFF CMAQ CAMx Watson, 1979, Dissertation; Watson and Chow 2005 Receptor Models: Chemical Mass Balance Positive Matrix Factorization Multilinear Engine UNMIX Refinery emission sources Petrochemical production sources


Recommended