+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment...

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment...

Date post: 28-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: joseph-atnip
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
37
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction
Transcript
Page 1: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

An Introduction

Page 2: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Presenter

Jason L. WeigleADEC CS-FFERP MMRP Lead

[email protected]

Page 3: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Today’s Presentation

• Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Background

• Terminology• Application• Community

Involvement

Page 4: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

Page 5: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

The National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2002• Requires DOD to:

– Create an inventory of MMR sites in the US and Territories [10 USC §2710(a)]

– Create a protocol with which to prioritize sites within each facility/state/region and across the United States [10 USC §2710(b)]

Page 6: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Site Eligibility

• 10 USC §2710(a) list: sites that have demonstrated UXO, DMM, or MC contamination or are suspected of having MEC contamination that was or is under component control.

• Exceptions:– Any location outside the United States– Sites where the presence of military

munitions results from combat operations– Operating storage and manufacturing

facilities– Operational (Active or Inactive) ranges

Page 7: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

• Close to 3400 MRA/MRS

• Over 2000 Installations

• 28 million acres

Statistics as of September 2004

(DENIX)

Image: USAEC

Page 8: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.
Page 9: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

• Proposed Rule released 2003• Final Rule Promulgated in Federal

Register on October 5, 2005– Preamble (70 FR 58016)– MRSPP Final Rule (70 FR 58028)

• Codified 32 CFR §179

Page 10: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Military Munition Terminology

Page 11: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC)

•Three Categories:– UXO– DMM– MC

•Chemical Warfare Materiel

Page 12: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRA/MRS• Munitions Response Area (MRA)

– Any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain UXO, DMM, or MC. Examples are former ranges and munitions burial areas. An MRA is comprised of one or more munitions response sites. (32 CFR §179.3)

• Munitions Response Site (MRS)– A discrete location within an MRA that is

known to require a munitions response. (32 CFR §179.3)

Page 13: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Camp Marmot

MRA 2 Range B

MRS B1:Rifle Range Target

Area

MRS C1:Hand Grenade

Range

MRA 3 Range C

MRS A3:Range Remainder

Active Range Range D

MRA 1 Range A

MRS A1:Target Area

MRS A2:Firing Point

Page 14: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

The Protocol

Page 15: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Modules Factors Data Elements

Evident (H)

Potential (M)

Confined (L)

CWM ConfigurationSources of CWM

Location of CWMEase of AccessStatus of Property

Types of Activities/StructuresEcological and/or Cultural Resources

Population DensityPopulation Near Hazard

Explosive HazardSource of Hazard

Location of MunitionsEase of AccessStatus of Property

Types of Activities/StructuresEcological and/or Cultural Resources

Population DensityPopulation Near Hazard

Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard

ReceptorsReceptors

Significant (H)

Moderate (M)

Minimal (L)

HHE ModuleHHE Module

CWM HazardCWM Hazard

CHE ModuleCHE Module Accessibility Accessibility

ReceptorsReceptors

EHE ModuleEHE Module Accessibility Accessibility

ReceptorsReceptors

Explosive HazardExplosive Hazard

MRSPriorityMRS

Priority

Migration PathwayMigration Pathway

Identified (H)

Potential (M)

Limited (L)

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005

Page 16: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Starting Off - Basic Information

Installation name (Property name for FUDS)

Installation name (Property name for FUDS)

LocationLocation

Site name(Project name for FUDS)

Site name(Project name for FUDS)

Federal FacilityIdentification Number

Federal FacilityIdentification Number

Contact person nameand information

Contact person nameand information

Priority or alternative module rating assigned and date

of evaluation

Priority or alternative module rating assigned and date

of evaluation

CERCLA phases completed or in progress

CERCLA phases completed or in progress

Date and score of previousevaluations if priority changes

Date and score of previousevaluations if priority changes

Summary of additionalinformation, as necessary

Summary of additionalinformation, as necessary

Map and/or cross sectionof the MRS if available

Map and/or cross sectionof the MRS if available

People involved in performingthe evaluation

People involved in performingthe evaluation

MRSPP Primer, Scoresheet ‘Table A’

Page 17: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Table 1EHE Module: Munitions Type Data Element Table

DIRECTIONS: Below are 11 classifications of munitions and their descriptions. Circle the score(s) that correspond withall munitions types found at the MRS.

Note: The terms practicemunitions,small arms, physical evidence, and historical evidence are defined in Appendix C ofthe Primer.

Classification Description Score

Sensitive

All UXO that are considered likely to function upon any interaction with exposed persons [e.g.,submunitions, 40mm high-explosi ve (HE) grenades, white phosphorus (WP) munitions, high-explosive antitank (HEAT) muniti ons, and practice munitions with sensitive fuzes, but excludingall other practice munitions].All hand grenad es containing energetic filler.Bulk primary explosives, or mixtures of these with environmental media, such that the mixtureposes an explosive hazard.

30

High explosive (used ordamaged)

All UXO containing a high-explosive filler (e.g., RDX, Composition B), that are not considered“sensitive.”All DMM containing a high -explosive filler that have:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

25

Pyrotechnic (used ordamaged)

All UXO containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorou s (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades).All DMM containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorous (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades) that have:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

20

High explosive (unused)All DMM contain ing a high explosive fille r that:

Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not deteriorated to the point of instability.

15

Propellant

All UXO containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor).All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor) that are:

Damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

15

Bulk secondary highexplosives, pyrotechnics,or propellant

All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor), that are deteriorated.Bulk secondary high explosives, pyrotechnic compositions, or propellant (not contained in amunition), or mixtures of these with environmental media such that the mixture poses anexplosive hazard.

10

Pyrotechnic (not used ordamaged)

All DMM contain ing a pyrotechnic fillers (i.e., red phosphorous), other than white phosphorousfiller, that:

Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not dete riorated to the point of instabilit y.

10

Practice

All UXO that are practice munitions that are not associated with a sensitive fuze.All DMM that ar e practice munitions that are no t associated with a sensitive fuze and that havenot:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

5

Riot control All UXO or DMM containing a riot control agent filler (e.g., tear gas). 3

Small armsAll used munitio ns or DMM that are categorized as small arms ammunition [Physical evidence orhistorical evidence that no other types of munitions (e.g., grenades, subcaliber training rockets,demolition charges) were used or are present on the MRS is requi red for selection of thiscategory.].

2

Evidence of no munitions Following investigation of the M RS, there is physical evidence that there a re no UXO or DMMpresent, or there is historical evidence indicating that no UXO or DMM are present.

0

MUNITIONSTYPEDIRECTIONS: Record the single highest score from above in the box to the

right (maximum score = 30).

DIRECTIONS: Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting theMunitions Type classifications in the spaceprovided.

______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _

30 Tables•EHE: 10•CHE: 10•HHE: 8 (max)•Priority Ranking•Table ‘A’

Page 18: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Table 1EHE Module: Munitions Type Data Element Table

DIRECTIONS: Below are 11 classifications of munitions and their descriptions. Circle the score(s) that correspond withall munitions types found at the MRS.

Note: The terms practicemunitions,small arms, physical evidence, and historical evidence are defined in Appendix C ofthe Primer.

Classification Description Score

Sensitive

All UXO that are considered likely to function upon any interaction with exposed persons [e.g.,submunitions, 40mm high-explosi ve (HE) grenades, white phosphorus (WP) munitions, high-explosive antitank (HEAT) muniti ons, and practice munitions with sensitive fuzes, but excludingall other practice munitions].All hand grenad es containing energetic filler.Bulk primary explosives, or mixtures of these with environmental media, such that the mixtureposes an explosive hazard.

30

High explosive (used ordamaged)

All UXO containing a high-explosive filler (e.g., RDX, Composition B), that are not considered“sensitive.”All DMM containing a high -explosive filler that have:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

25

Pyrotechnic (used ordamaged)

All UXO containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorou s (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades).All DMM containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorous (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades) that have:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

20

High explosive (unused)All DMM contain ing a high explosive fille r that:

Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not deteriorated to the point of instability.

15

Propellant

All UXO containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor).All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor) that are:

Damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

15

Bulk secondary highexplosives, pyrotechnics,or propellant

All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor), that are deteriorated.Bulk secondary high explosives, pyrotechnic compositions, or propellant (not contained in amunition), or mixtures of these with environmental media such that the mixture poses anexplosive hazard.

10

Pyrotechnic (not used ordamaged)

All DMM contain ing a pyrotechnic fillers (i.e., red phosphorous), other than white phosphorousfiller, that:

Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not dete riorated to the point of instabilit y.

10

Practice

All UXO that are practice munitions that are not associated with a sensitive fuze.All DMM that ar e practice munitions that are no t associated with a sensitive fuze and that havenot:

Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.

5

Riot control All UXO or DMM containing a riot control agent filler (e.g., tear gas). 3

Small armsAll used munitio ns or DMM that are categorized as small arms ammunition [Physical evidence orhistorical evidence that no other types of munitions (e.g., grenades, subcaliber training rockets,demolition charges) were used or are present on the MRS is requi red for selection of thiscategory.].

2

Evidence of no munitions Following investigation of the M RS, there is physical evidence that there a re no UXO or DMMpresent, or there is historical evidence indicating that no UXO or DMM are present.

0

MUNITIONSTYPEDIRECTIONS: Record the single highest score from above in the box to the

right (maximum score = 30).

DIRECTIONS: Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting theMunitions Type classifications in the spaceprovided.

______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _

Circle all munitions types present at the MRS

Record only the largest single classification score in the Munitions Type box

DO NOT ADD MULTIPLE SCORES TOGETHER!

Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting the Munitions Type classifications here

Page 19: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005

Page 20: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

1a. Enter the Explosive Hazard data element scores

1b. Add to determine factor values

3a. Enter the Receptors Factor data element scores

3b. Add to determine factor value

4. Add the three factor values

2a. Enter the Accessibility Factor data element scores

2b. Add to determine factor values

5. Select the Module Rating that corresponds with the module value

6. Record the Module Rating in the EHE Module Rating box

Table 10Determining the EHE Module Rating

Source Score Value

Explosive Hazard Factor Data Elements

Munitions Type Table 1

Source of Hazard Table 2

Accessibility Factor Data Elements

Location of Munitions Table 3

Ease of Access Table 4

Status of Property Table 5

Receptors Factor Data Elements

PopulationDensity Table 6

PopulationNear Hazard Table 7

Types of Activities/ Structures Table 8

Ecological and /or CulturalResources

Table 9

EHE MODULE TOTAL

EHE Module Total EHE Module Rating

92 to 100 A

82 to 91 B

71 to 81 C

60 to 70 D

48 to 59 E

38 to 47 F

less than 38 G

EvaluationPending

No Longer RequiredAlternative Module Ratings

No Known or SuspectedExplosiveHazard

DIRECTIONS:

1. From Tables 1-9, record thedata element scores in theScore boxes to the right.

2. Add the Score boxes for eachof the three factors and recordthis number in the Value boxesto the right.

3. Add the three Value boxes andrecord this number in the EHEModule Total box below.

4. Circle the appropriate range forthe EHE Module Total below.

5. Circle the EHE Module Ratingthat corresponds to the rangeselected and record this value inthe EHE Module Rating boxfound at the bottom of the table.

Note:An alternative module rating may beassigned when a module letter rating isinappropriate. An alternative modulerating is used when more information isneeded to score one or more dataelements, contaminat ion at an MRS waspreviously addressed, or there is noreason to suspect contamination wasever present at an MRS.

EHE MODULE RATING

05

05

02

01

25

05

03

30

1040

33

13

86

B

Page 21: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRSPP – Alternative Ratings

• Evaluation Pending

• No Longer Required

• No Known or Suspected Explosive Hazard (CWM Hazard, MC Hazard)

Page 22: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Mu

niti

on

s R

esp

on

se S

ite P

rio

ritiz

atio

n P

roto

col T

rain

ing

Ma

nu

al,

De

cem

ber

20

05

CWM, explosive configuration, either UXO or damaged DMM

Page 23: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005

Page 24: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE)

HHE ModuleHHE Module

Groundwater(human)

Groundwater(human)

Surface Water(human, ecological)Surface Water

(human, ecological)

Sediment(human, ecological)

Sediment(human, ecological)

Surface Soil(human)

Surface Soil(human)

Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard

ReceptorsReceptors

Migration PathwayMigration Pathway

Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard

ReceptorsReceptors

Migration PathwayMigration Pathway

Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard

ReceptorsReceptors

Migration PathwayMigration Pathway

Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard

ReceptorsReceptors

Migration PathwayMigration Pathway

Page 25: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

9. Circle the value for the Receptors Factor

1. List the names and maximum concentrations of all MC and associated contaminants

7. Circle the value for the Migration Pathway Factor

8. Record the value

6. Record the value

3. Calculate the ratio for each contaminant

2. List the associated comparison values from Appendix B of Primer

10. Record the value

5. Circle the CHF Value that corresponds to the sum of ratios

4. Calculate the sum of the ratios6.123

H

Lead 22.0 µg/L

RDX 38.0 µg/L

4.00 µg/L

61.0µg/L

5.50

0.623

M

H

Page 26: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005

Page 27: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

Mu

niti

on

s R

esp

on

se S

ite P

riorit

iza

tion

Pro

toco

l Tra

inin

g M

an

ua

l, D

ece

mb

er

20

05

Page 28: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRSPP - Sequencing• The sequencing of a MRS for action will

be based primarily on the MRS’s relative priority

• DoD policy states that a MRS with higher relative risks will be addressed before an MRS with lower relative risks

• Once an MRS's priority is determined, the Component may consider other factors in sequencing a site. These other ‘risk-plus’ factors– Do not change or influence the MRS Priority– May influence sequencing decisions

Page 29: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Sequencing Factors

Concerns expressed by regulators or stakeholders

Cultural and social factors

Economic factors

Findings of health, safety, or ecological risk assessments or evaluations based on MRS-specific data

A community’s reuse requirements at BRAC installations

Specialized considerations of tribal trust lands

Reasonably anticipated future land use

Implementation and execution considerations

Mission-driven requirements

The availability of appropriate technology

Implementing standing commitments

Established program goals and initiatives

Short-term and long-term ecological effects and environmental impacts in general, including injuries to natural resources

Examples of Risk-Plus Factors

Concerns expressed by regulators or stakeholders

Cultural and social factors

Economic factors

Findings of health, safety, or ecological risk assessments or evaluations based on MRS-specific data

A community’s reuse requirements at BRAC installations

Specialized considerations of tribal trust lands

Reasonably anticipated future land use

Implementation and execution considerations

Mission-driven requirements

The availability of appropriate technology

Implementing standing commitments

Established program goals and initiatives

Short-term and long-term ecological effects and environmental impacts in general, including injuries to natural resources

Examples of Risk-Plus Factors

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005

Page 30: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRSPP – The Fine Print• Priorities will be reviewed by an

internal DOD QA panel to ensure consistency; priority rankings can be changed by panel

• Priorities at all sites must be reviewed annually– Site must be re-scored if site

conditions have changed or if new information becomes available

• Data age for chemical, geophysical investigations

Page 31: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRSPP

• Scoring tables in MRSPP Appendix A

• HHE Scoresheets and Relative Risk Comparison Values located in MRSPP Primer (under production; based on EPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals)

Page 32: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Opportunities for Input

Page 33: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

MRSPP

• The Protocol requires Components to offer stakeholders opportunities to comment and participate in the application of the Protocol and sequencing recommendations

• How these opportunities are ‘offered’ varies from Component to Component

Page 34: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Protocol Requirement for Stakeholder Involvement

• Notify leaders of stakeholder organizations of the opportunity to participate in the application of the Protocol and seek their involvement

• Publish an announcement in local community publications about stakeholder participation in the initial application of the Protocol and request information pertinent to prioritization or sequencing

• Include a copy of all public notices and announcements in the for the MRS Administrative Record, Information Repository, or project file

Each Component shall – See 32 CFR §176.5 for specific regulatory language

Page 35: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Protocol Requirement for Stakeholder Involvement

• Incorporate stakeholders’ input in prioritization and sequencing decisions and document the decisions in the Management Action Plan (MAP)

• Include information provided by stakeholders that influenced the priority or sequencing decision in the MRS Administrative Record, Information Repository, or project file

• Provide stakeholders with information on prioritization or sequencing changes and request their comments

Each Component shall (cont’d) –

Page 36: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Final Thoughts

• Evolving process• Contractor implemented

– A lot of people will be going into the field who are not from Alaska or understand how Alaska works – be gentle!

• MRSPP is a good opportunity to get information on sites – be active!

Page 37: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 8 February 2006Alaska Forum on the Environment Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol An Introduction.

8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment

Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation

Questions?

Boomer the OtterAdak Ordnance Awareness Program


Recommended