Date post: | 28-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | joseph-atnip |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
An Introduction
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Presenter
Jason L. WeigleADEC CS-FFERP MMRP Lead
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Today’s Presentation
• Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Background
• Terminology• Application• Community
Involvement
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
The National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2002• Requires DOD to:
– Create an inventory of MMR sites in the US and Territories [10 USC §2710(a)]
– Create a protocol with which to prioritize sites within each facility/state/region and across the United States [10 USC §2710(b)]
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Site Eligibility
• 10 USC §2710(a) list: sites that have demonstrated UXO, DMM, or MC contamination or are suspected of having MEC contamination that was or is under component control.
• Exceptions:– Any location outside the United States– Sites where the presence of military
munitions results from combat operations– Operating storage and manufacturing
facilities– Operational (Active or Inactive) ranges
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
• Close to 3400 MRA/MRS
• Over 2000 Installations
• 28 million acres
Statistics as of September 2004
(DENIX)
Image: USAEC
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
• Proposed Rule released 2003• Final Rule Promulgated in Federal
Register on October 5, 2005– Preamble (70 FR 58016)– MRSPP Final Rule (70 FR 58028)
• Codified 32 CFR §179
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Military Munition Terminology
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC)
•Three Categories:– UXO– DMM– MC
•Chemical Warfare Materiel
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRA/MRS• Munitions Response Area (MRA)
– Any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain UXO, DMM, or MC. Examples are former ranges and munitions burial areas. An MRA is comprised of one or more munitions response sites. (32 CFR §179.3)
• Munitions Response Site (MRS)– A discrete location within an MRA that is
known to require a munitions response. (32 CFR §179.3)
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Camp Marmot
MRA 2 Range B
MRS B1:Rifle Range Target
Area
MRS C1:Hand Grenade
Range
MRA 3 Range C
MRS A3:Range Remainder
Active Range Range D
MRA 1 Range A
MRS A1:Target Area
MRS A2:Firing Point
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
The Protocol
Modules Factors Data Elements
Evident (H)
Potential (M)
Confined (L)
CWM ConfigurationSources of CWM
Location of CWMEase of AccessStatus of Property
Types of Activities/StructuresEcological and/or Cultural Resources
Population DensityPopulation Near Hazard
Explosive HazardSource of Hazard
Location of MunitionsEase of AccessStatus of Property
Types of Activities/StructuresEcological and/or Cultural Resources
Population DensityPopulation Near Hazard
Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard
ReceptorsReceptors
Significant (H)
Moderate (M)
Minimal (L)
HHE ModuleHHE Module
CWM HazardCWM Hazard
CHE ModuleCHE Module Accessibility Accessibility
ReceptorsReceptors
EHE ModuleEHE Module Accessibility Accessibility
ReceptorsReceptors
Explosive HazardExplosive Hazard
MRSPriorityMRS
Priority
Migration PathwayMigration Pathway
Identified (H)
Potential (M)
Limited (L)
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Starting Off - Basic Information
Installation name (Property name for FUDS)
Installation name (Property name for FUDS)
LocationLocation
Site name(Project name for FUDS)
Site name(Project name for FUDS)
Federal FacilityIdentification Number
Federal FacilityIdentification Number
Contact person nameand information
Contact person nameand information
Priority or alternative module rating assigned and date
of evaluation
Priority or alternative module rating assigned and date
of evaluation
CERCLA phases completed or in progress
CERCLA phases completed or in progress
Date and score of previousevaluations if priority changes
Date and score of previousevaluations if priority changes
Summary of additionalinformation, as necessary
Summary of additionalinformation, as necessary
Map and/or cross sectionof the MRS if available
Map and/or cross sectionof the MRS if available
People involved in performingthe evaluation
People involved in performingthe evaluation
MRSPP Primer, Scoresheet ‘Table A’
Table 1EHE Module: Munitions Type Data Element Table
DIRECTIONS: Below are 11 classifications of munitions and their descriptions. Circle the score(s) that correspond withall munitions types found at the MRS.
Note: The terms practicemunitions,small arms, physical evidence, and historical evidence are defined in Appendix C ofthe Primer.
Classification Description Score
Sensitive
All UXO that are considered likely to function upon any interaction with exposed persons [e.g.,submunitions, 40mm high-explosi ve (HE) grenades, white phosphorus (WP) munitions, high-explosive antitank (HEAT) muniti ons, and practice munitions with sensitive fuzes, but excludingall other practice munitions].All hand grenad es containing energetic filler.Bulk primary explosives, or mixtures of these with environmental media, such that the mixtureposes an explosive hazard.
30
High explosive (used ordamaged)
All UXO containing a high-explosive filler (e.g., RDX, Composition B), that are not considered“sensitive.”All DMM containing a high -explosive filler that have:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
25
Pyrotechnic (used ordamaged)
All UXO containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorou s (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades).All DMM containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorous (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades) that have:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
20
High explosive (unused)All DMM contain ing a high explosive fille r that:
Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not deteriorated to the point of instability.
15
Propellant
All UXO containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor).All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor) that are:
Damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
15
Bulk secondary highexplosives, pyrotechnics,or propellant
All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor), that are deteriorated.Bulk secondary high explosives, pyrotechnic compositions, or propellant (not contained in amunition), or mixtures of these with environmental media such that the mixture poses anexplosive hazard.
10
Pyrotechnic (not used ordamaged)
All DMM contain ing a pyrotechnic fillers (i.e., red phosphorous), other than white phosphorousfiller, that:
Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not dete riorated to the point of instabilit y.
10
Practice
All UXO that are practice munitions that are not associated with a sensitive fuze.All DMM that ar e practice munitions that are no t associated with a sensitive fuze and that havenot:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
5
Riot control All UXO or DMM containing a riot control agent filler (e.g., tear gas). 3
Small armsAll used munitio ns or DMM that are categorized as small arms ammunition [Physical evidence orhistorical evidence that no other types of munitions (e.g., grenades, subcaliber training rockets,demolition charges) were used or are present on the MRS is requi red for selection of thiscategory.].
2
Evidence of no munitions Following investigation of the M RS, there is physical evidence that there a re no UXO or DMMpresent, or there is historical evidence indicating that no UXO or DMM are present.
0
MUNITIONSTYPEDIRECTIONS: Record the single highest score from above in the box to the
right (maximum score = 30).
DIRECTIONS: Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting theMunitions Type classifications in the spaceprovided.
______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _
30 Tables•EHE: 10•CHE: 10•HHE: 8 (max)•Priority Ranking•Table ‘A’
Table 1EHE Module: Munitions Type Data Element Table
DIRECTIONS: Below are 11 classifications of munitions and their descriptions. Circle the score(s) that correspond withall munitions types found at the MRS.
Note: The terms practicemunitions,small arms, physical evidence, and historical evidence are defined in Appendix C ofthe Primer.
Classification Description Score
Sensitive
All UXO that are considered likely to function upon any interaction with exposed persons [e.g.,submunitions, 40mm high-explosi ve (HE) grenades, white phosphorus (WP) munitions, high-explosive antitank (HEAT) muniti ons, and practice munitions with sensitive fuzes, but excludingall other practice munitions].All hand grenad es containing energetic filler.Bulk primary explosives, or mixtures of these with environmental media, such that the mixtureposes an explosive hazard.
30
High explosive (used ordamaged)
All UXO containing a high-explosive filler (e.g., RDX, Composition B), that are not considered“sensitive.”All DMM containing a high -explosive filler that have:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
25
Pyrotechnic (used ordamaged)
All UXO containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorou s (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades).All DMM containing pyrotechnic fillers other than white phosphorous (e.g., flares, signals,simulators, smoke grenades) that have:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
20
High explosive (unused)All DMM contain ing a high explosive fille r that:
Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not deteriorated to the point of instability.
15
Propellant
All UXO containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor).All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor) that are:
Damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
15
Bulk secondary highexplosives, pyrotechnics,or propellant
All DMM containing most ly single-, double-, o r triple-based p ropellant, or composite propellants(e.g., a rocket motor), that are deteriorated.Bulk secondary high explosives, pyrotechnic compositions, or propellant (not contained in amunition), or mixtures of these with environmental media such that the mixture poses anexplosive hazard.
10
Pyrotechnic (not used ordamaged)
All DMM contain ing a pyrotechnic fillers (i.e., red phosphorous), other than white phosphorousfiller, that:
Have not been damaged by burning or detonationAre not dete riorated to the point of instabilit y.
10
Practice
All UXO that are practice munitions that are not associated with a sensitive fuze.All DMM that ar e practice munitions that are no t associated with a sensitive fuze and that havenot:
Been damaged by burning or detonationDeteriorated to the point of instability.
5
Riot control All UXO or DMM containing a riot control agent filler (e.g., tear gas). 3
Small armsAll used munitio ns or DMM that are categorized as small arms ammunition [Physical evidence orhistorical evidence that no other types of munitions (e.g., grenades, subcaliber training rockets,demolition charges) were used or are present on the MRS is requi red for selection of thiscategory.].
2
Evidence of no munitions Following investigation of the M RS, there is physical evidence that there a re no UXO or DMMpresent, or there is historical evidence indicating that no UXO or DMM are present.
0
MUNITIONSTYPEDIRECTIONS: Record the single highest score from above in the box to the
right (maximum score = 30).
DIRECTIONS: Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting theMunitions Type classifications in the spaceprovided.
______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _
Circle all munitions types present at the MRS
Record only the largest single classification score in the Munitions Type box
DO NOT ADD MULTIPLE SCORES TOGETHER!
Document any MRS-specific data used in selecting the Munitions Type classifications here
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005
1a. Enter the Explosive Hazard data element scores
1b. Add to determine factor values
3a. Enter the Receptors Factor data element scores
3b. Add to determine factor value
4. Add the three factor values
2a. Enter the Accessibility Factor data element scores
2b. Add to determine factor values
5. Select the Module Rating that corresponds with the module value
6. Record the Module Rating in the EHE Module Rating box
Table 10Determining the EHE Module Rating
Source Score Value
Explosive Hazard Factor Data Elements
Munitions Type Table 1
Source of Hazard Table 2
Accessibility Factor Data Elements
Location of Munitions Table 3
Ease of Access Table 4
Status of Property Table 5
Receptors Factor Data Elements
PopulationDensity Table 6
PopulationNear Hazard Table 7
Types of Activities/ Structures Table 8
Ecological and /or CulturalResources
Table 9
EHE MODULE TOTAL
EHE Module Total EHE Module Rating
92 to 100 A
82 to 91 B
71 to 81 C
60 to 70 D
48 to 59 E
38 to 47 F
less than 38 G
EvaluationPending
No Longer RequiredAlternative Module Ratings
No Known or SuspectedExplosiveHazard
DIRECTIONS:
1. From Tables 1-9, record thedata element scores in theScore boxes to the right.
2. Add the Score boxes for eachof the three factors and recordthis number in the Value boxesto the right.
3. Add the three Value boxes andrecord this number in the EHEModule Total box below.
4. Circle the appropriate range forthe EHE Module Total below.
5. Circle the EHE Module Ratingthat corresponds to the rangeselected and record this value inthe EHE Module Rating boxfound at the bottom of the table.
Note:An alternative module rating may beassigned when a module letter rating isinappropriate. An alternative modulerating is used when more information isneeded to score one or more dataelements, contaminat ion at an MRS waspreviously addressed, or there is noreason to suspect contamination wasever present at an MRS.
EHE MODULE RATING
05
05
02
01
25
05
03
30
1040
33
13
86
B
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRSPP – Alternative Ratings
• Evaluation Pending
• No Longer Required
• No Known or Suspected Explosive Hazard (CWM Hazard, MC Hazard)
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Mu
niti
on
s R
esp
on
se S
ite P
rio
ritiz
atio
n P
roto
col T
rain
ing
Ma
nu
al,
De
cem
ber
20
05
CWM, explosive configuration, either UXO or damaged DMM
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE)
HHE ModuleHHE Module
Groundwater(human)
Groundwater(human)
Surface Water(human, ecological)Surface Water
(human, ecological)
Sediment(human, ecological)
Sediment(human, ecological)
Surface Soil(human)
Surface Soil(human)
Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard
ReceptorsReceptors
Migration PathwayMigration Pathway
Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard
ReceptorsReceptors
Migration PathwayMigration Pathway
Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard
ReceptorsReceptors
Migration PathwayMigration Pathway
Contaminant HazardContaminant Hazard
ReceptorsReceptors
Migration PathwayMigration Pathway
9. Circle the value for the Receptors Factor
1. List the names and maximum concentrations of all MC and associated contaminants
7. Circle the value for the Migration Pathway Factor
8. Record the value
6. Record the value
3. Calculate the ratio for each contaminant
2. List the associated comparison values from Appendix B of Primer
10. Record the value
5. Circle the CHF Value that corresponds to the sum of ratios
4. Calculate the sum of the ratios6.123
H
Lead 22.0 µg/L
RDX 38.0 µg/L
4.00 µg/L
61.0µg/L
5.50
0.623
M
H
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
ConservationMunitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005
Mu
niti
on
s R
esp
on
se S
ite P
riorit
iza
tion
Pro
toco
l Tra
inin
g M
an
ua
l, D
ece
mb
er
20
05
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRSPP - Sequencing• The sequencing of a MRS for action will
be based primarily on the MRS’s relative priority
• DoD policy states that a MRS with higher relative risks will be addressed before an MRS with lower relative risks
• Once an MRS's priority is determined, the Component may consider other factors in sequencing a site. These other ‘risk-plus’ factors– Do not change or influence the MRS Priority– May influence sequencing decisions
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Sequencing Factors
Concerns expressed by regulators or stakeholders
Cultural and social factors
Economic factors
Findings of health, safety, or ecological risk assessments or evaluations based on MRS-specific data
A community’s reuse requirements at BRAC installations
Specialized considerations of tribal trust lands
Reasonably anticipated future land use
Implementation and execution considerations
Mission-driven requirements
The availability of appropriate technology
Implementing standing commitments
Established program goals and initiatives
Short-term and long-term ecological effects and environmental impacts in general, including injuries to natural resources
Examples of Risk-Plus Factors
Concerns expressed by regulators or stakeholders
Cultural and social factors
Economic factors
Findings of health, safety, or ecological risk assessments or evaluations based on MRS-specific data
A community’s reuse requirements at BRAC installations
Specialized considerations of tribal trust lands
Reasonably anticipated future land use
Implementation and execution considerations
Mission-driven requirements
The availability of appropriate technology
Implementing standing commitments
Established program goals and initiatives
Short-term and long-term ecological effects and environmental impacts in general, including injuries to natural resources
Examples of Risk-Plus Factors
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Training Manual, December 2005
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRSPP – The Fine Print• Priorities will be reviewed by an
internal DOD QA panel to ensure consistency; priority rankings can be changed by panel
• Priorities at all sites must be reviewed annually– Site must be re-scored if site
conditions have changed or if new information becomes available
• Data age for chemical, geophysical investigations
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRSPP
• Scoring tables in MRSPP Appendix A
• HHE Scoresheets and Relative Risk Comparison Values located in MRSPP Primer (under production; based on EPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals)
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Opportunities for Input
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
MRSPP
• The Protocol requires Components to offer stakeholders opportunities to comment and participate in the application of the Protocol and sequencing recommendations
• How these opportunities are ‘offered’ varies from Component to Component
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Protocol Requirement for Stakeholder Involvement
• Notify leaders of stakeholder organizations of the opportunity to participate in the application of the Protocol and seek their involvement
• Publish an announcement in local community publications about stakeholder participation in the initial application of the Protocol and request information pertinent to prioritization or sequencing
• Include a copy of all public notices and announcements in the for the MRS Administrative Record, Information Repository, or project file
Each Component shall – See 32 CFR §176.5 for specific regulatory language
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Protocol Requirement for Stakeholder Involvement
• Incorporate stakeholders’ input in prioritization and sequencing decisions and document the decisions in the Management Action Plan (MAP)
• Include information provided by stakeholders that influenced the priority or sequencing decision in the MRS Administrative Record, Information Repository, or project file
• Provide stakeholders with information on prioritization or sequencing changes and request their comments
Each Component shall (cont’d) –
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Final Thoughts
• Evolving process• Contractor implemented
– A lot of people will be going into the field who are not from Alaska or understand how Alaska works – be gentle!
• MRSPP is a good opportunity to get information on sites – be active!
8 February 2006 Alaska Forum on the Environment
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Questions?
Boomer the OtterAdak Ordnance Awareness Program