Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | marshall-george |
View: | 27 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Alex Ordway60 hours worked
Attitude Control Subsystem Component Selection and
Analysis
2
Design Drivers
• Meeting mission pointing requirements
• Meet power requirements
• Meet mass requirements
• Cost
• Miscellaneous Factors
3
Trade Study
• Sliding Mass vs. Tip Thruster Configuration– Idea behind sliding mass
4
Trade Study
• Sliding mass ACS offers– Low power consumption (24 W)– Reasonable mass (40 kg)– Low complexity– Smaller contribution to spacecraft MOI– Limitations
• Unknown torque provided until calculations are made• No roll capability
• Initially decided to use combination of sliding mass and tip thrusters
5
ADCS System Overview
• ADS– Goodrich HD1003 Star Tracker primary– Bradford Aerospace Sun Sensor secondary
• ACS– Four 10 kg sliding masses primary
• Driven by four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 motors
– Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels secondary
– Six Bradford Aero micro thrusters secondary• Dissipate residual momentum after sail release
6
ADS
• Primary– Decision to use star tracker
• Accuracy• Do not need slew rate afforded by other systems
– Goodrich HD1003 star tracker• 2 arc-sec pitch/yaw accuracy• 3.85 kg• 10 W power draw• -30°C - + 65 °C operational temp. range• $1M
– Not Chosen: Terma Space HE-5AS star tracker• Lower thermal thresholds (-20°C - +40°C)• Greater power draw (15W)
7
ADS
• Secondary– Two Bradford Aerospace sun sensors
• Backup system; performance not as crucial• Sensor located on opposite sides of craft• 0.365 kg each• 0.2 W each• -80°C - +90°C
8
ACS
• Sliding mass system– Why four masses?– FRONTAL PICTURE OF THINGAMAJIG HERE
9
ACS
• Sliding mass system– Four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 Step Motors
• Cryo/space rated• 1.5 kg each• 28 W power draw each 200 °C
• $55 K each• 42.4 N-cm torque
10
ACS
• Gear matching- load inertia decreases by the gear ratio squared. Show that this system does not need to be geared.
2
2
2170 (600sec)
20.00389
(10 )(0.00389 )
0.0389
ms
ms
m a
a
F ma kg
F N
11
ACS
• Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels– Mission application– Specifications
• 7.5 kg each• 66 W power draw each (at full speed)• -30ºC - +70ºC• 0.2 N-m torque• $200K each• Not selected
– Honeywell HR04– Bradford Aerospace W18
12
ACS
• Six Bradford micro thrusters– 0.4 kg each– 4.5 W power draw each– -30ºC - + 60ºC– 2000 N thrust
– Supplied through N2 tank
13
Attitude Control
• Conclusion– Robust ADCS
• Meets and exceeds mission requirements• Marriage of simplicity and effectiveness• Redundancies against the unexpected