Alexandre Kossoy Philippe Ambrosi
2010: Overall market stalls
135
0.711
31
63
(in billion US$)
144 142
A global market driven by the EU ETS
CDM market value halved again
• CDM activity declined markedly
– reduced compliance needs due to slow economic recovery
– uncertainty re: post-2012 rules– less origination activity as buyers seek
predictable credits and less projects– competition with AAUs and secondary
CERs
• Following lower demand by EU ETS
– Segmentation due to qualitative restrictions (ban of CERs from industrial gases)
– Risk allocation reflects buyers’ market
Catalytic role of CDM & JI disappears without post-2012
clarity
CDM value(US$ billion
-12%
-59%
-46%
Contracted(nominal)
Contracted (risk-adjusted)
KM Demand2008-12
AAU
CDM&JI
CDM&JI
AAU
2,525 MtCO2e
1,330 MtCO2e1,392 MtCO2e
• Demand: 1.39 billion tCO2e until 2012
• Supply: 1.33 billion tCO2e contracted– 1.09 billion CERs & ERUs
contracted (risk-adjusted)
– 245 million AAUs contracted
• Residual demand of only136 MtCO2e
• Aggregate picture; not all buyers contracted the volume they need
Residual demand of 136 MtCO2e, mostly from EU governments
Balanced market: 2008-12
Supply Demand until 2012 (data in the S&T report)
Most offsets w/ priv. sec.
*Including Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland** Australia, New Zealand and United States
MtC
O2
e
Market projections indicateconstrained demand over 2013-20
Maximum demand (conservative scenarios)Low High
Potential supply 2013-20 (data in the S&T report)
Potential demand 2013-20 (data in the S&T report)
(1.7-750+800) (2.2-750+1.1)
A complex regulatory and policy scenario is affecting the market
2010 saw regulatory ups:
• Progresses in Cancun & EU commitments until 2050
And downs…
• EU ETS loopholes & oversight, security issues
Politically, a number of opportunities were missed:
• U.S., Japan, Australia, Republic of Korea
While others gained traction:
• California, developing countries such as Brazil, Chile, China, India and Mexico.
New initiatives signal that solutions to the climate challenge will emerge.
Still, let’s step back and look outside the box
• Cumulative CDM credits transacted of 2.3 bln tons CERs in 2002-2010 …
… which is the annual size of the EU ETS (40% of EU emissions) today
… and 75% of Kyoto’s total ER targets (~3 bln tCO2e over 2008-12)
• … resulting in US$27 bln (and benefiting to more than US$100 bln in low-carbon investments - mostly private sector) …
… which is in the same level of magnitude of the Green Climate Fund pledged by Parties in Cancun
• … at long-term average price of $10-$15 per ton …
… which is much lower than the marginal abatement cost for developed countries to reduce emissions through domestic measures only
• Depending on ambition of collective action, carbon flow to developing countries by 2020 could, at prices of US$20-30, can reach US$30-50 bln …
… vs. all RE investments to developing countries of US$77 bln in 2010 (US$143 bln in total and up 12-fold since 2004)
Full report available at
www.carbonfinance.org
Thank you
2011: Recent developments in the C-mkt
• “2011 is turning out to be a very noisy year“ for commodity markets:
– Political turmoil in the Middle East, – Japanese earthquake and nuclear crisis at Fukushima, – Phase-out of the German nuclear capacity (closure of 8.4 Gw), – European Union (EU) sovereign debt crisis (double-dip recession?),– The US credit downgrade.
• Translating into a very nervous carbon markets:
– Secondary market:• July: record options contracted (i.e., high volatility),
• August volumes at second highest monthly levels ever ~800MtCO2e (180Mt CERs),
• August prices close to historic all-time low of February 2009.
– Primary market (post-2012):• Development of deals previously originated; few new origination,
• Strong conditionality clauses (right of first refusal ?),
• Preference for floating prices (at 70-95% sCER at delivery);
• Fewer fixed-price deals in the 5-8 Euro range (most below 7.5 Euros),
• Illiquid market leads to lack of transparency and wider range of prices.