+ All Categories
Home > Documents > All panelists

All panelists

Date post: 21-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: mricky
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
44
1 Leveraging the COSO Framework to Meet Section 404 Requirements The Institute of Internal Auditors Webcast Series on Sarbanes-Oxley Act July 8, 2003 1:00 – 2:30 pm Eastern Time
Transcript
Page 1: All panelists

1

Leveraging the COSO Framework to Meet

Section 404 Requirements

Leveraging the COSO Framework to Meet

Section 404 Requirements

The Institute of Internal Auditors

Webcast Series on Sarbanes-Oxley Act

July 8, 2003

1:00 – 2:30 pm Eastern Time

Page 2: All panelists

2

The IIA Webcast ModeratorThe IIA Webcast Moderator

Jim Key, CIA

Managing Partner

Shenandoah Group, L.L.P

Page 3: All panelists

3

DisclaimerDisclaimer

The views expressed in this web cast are solely those of the panelists and moderators and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Institute of Internal Auditors or its directors, officers, employees, and members.

Page 4: All panelists

4

The Webcast Series on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Webcast Series on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Series 1: Fostering Compliance with SOA:

Internal Auditor’s Role

– Four sessions archived on website and available on CD

– To purchase contact Alex at [email protected]

Page 5: All panelists

5

Series 2: Emerging Trends and Best Practices in Implementing SOA

Series 2: Emerging Trends and Best Practices in Implementing SOA

• May 21 - Section 404 Readiness Review: How to document your system of internal control. (Archived)

• June 10 - Helping your audit committee implement complaint handling. (Archived)

• July 8 - Leveraging the COSO framework to meet Section 404 requirements

• August 12 - Project Administration – Setting and revising priorities in the wake of the “Final 404 Rules”

• September 9 - Internal Audit support of Audit Committees – What works best

• September 30 - The Road Ahead – Meeting the challenges in complying with The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Page 6: All panelists

6

Sarbanes-Oxley: Implications and Impact for

Internal Audit

Sarbanes-Oxley: Implications and Impact for

Internal Audit• Seminar Offering: 2.5 Days

Chicago, July 30 Seattle, August 4 West Palm Beach, August 25 Phoenix, September 10 San Francisco, September 24 Orlando, December 10 New York, December 17

Page 7: All panelists

7

Other ResourcesOther Resources

• IIA Web Page www.theiia.org – Click on Guidance– Click on Tools and Resources for Corporate

Governance IIA Position Papers Responses to exposure drafts IIA Research Foundation Master Key Series The Sarbanes-Oxley legislation Stock listing exchanges key requirements

Page 8: All panelists

8

Management Assessment of Internal Controls (404)

Management Assessment of Internal Controls (404)

• Requires the SEC to prescribe rules to:– State the responsibility of management for

establishing and maintaining adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting, and

– Contain an assessment of effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting

Page 9: All panelists

9

SEC Final RulesSEC Final Rules

• Management's Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports

• Release Date: June 5, 2003 (33-8238)• Effective Date: August 14, 2003• Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial

Reporting within the context of COSO framework

Page 10: All panelists

10

AgendaAgenda

1:00 Welcome and Overview

1:10 Soft Controls – Bruce Adamec

1:20 Control Activities – Ray Lukas

1:30 Monitoring – Andrew Bellenkes

1:40 Break

1:45 Questions and Answers – Panel

2:25 Wrap up – Jim Key

Page 11: All panelists

11

Soft ControlsSoft Controls

Bruce Adamec, CPA, CIA

Vice President and General Auditor

United Stationers Inc.

Page 12: All panelists

12

• Control Environment

• Risk Assessment

• Information & Communication

Soft ControlsSoft Controls

Page 13: All panelists

13

The Goal is Reliable Financial Results and Safeguarding Assets –

Are “Soft” Components Important?

The Goal is Reliable Financial Results and Safeguarding Assets –

Are “Soft” Components Important?

• Commissioner Paul S. Atkins, SEC,

Rocky Mountain Securities Conference: Denver, Colorado, May 30, 2003

“A long standing risk management principle is the importance of corporate culture and “tone from the top”. A CEO’s tolerance, or lack of tolerance of ethical misdeeds and a CEO’s philosophy of business conveys a great deal throughout the organization. The role of directors is to monitor and oversee that situation on behalf of stockholders.“

Page 14: All panelists

14

• Commissioner Cynthia Glassman, SEC,

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago May 9, 2003

“I can’t walk away from any discussion of corporate governance without stressing that the most important aspect of reform comes from market participants working proactively to foster an ethical culture in business.”

The Goal is Reliable Financial Results and Safeguarding Assets –

Are “Soft” Components Important?

The Goal is Reliable Financial Results and Safeguarding Assets –

Are “Soft” Components Important?

Page 15: All panelists

15

Why We Should Care About Soft Controls – Even Without Sarbanes

Oxley!

Why We Should Care About Soft Controls – Even Without Sarbanes

Oxley!

• Howard Shilit, Smart Money, July 2003,

“Bad people, in business model with a nice story, will somehow find a way to destroy the business…But with honest people running the company…they’ll be able to navigate through the tough times and the company won’t blow it.”

Page 16: All panelists

16

404 Evaluation404 Evaluation

• Clear Understanding of Soft Components

• Infrastructure Evaluation – “Hard” Activities for “Soft” Components

• Evaluation of How Well The Soft Components Are Working to Ensure Financial Statement Reliability, Safeguarding Assets

Page 17: All panelists

17

What Do COSO Components Mean?

What Do COSO Components Mean?

• Control Environment – Organization’s Ethics, Tone At Top, Management Philosophy and Style, Commitment to Competence – Management Culture

• Risk Assessment – How Organization Routinely

ID’s and Manages Risks – Goals and Obstacles• Information and Communication –

Identifying, Capturing, and Communicating Relevant Data in a Form and Time Frame To Meet Associates’, Investor, and Board of Director’s (Governance) Needs

Page 18: All panelists

18

Infrastructure Evaluation“Hard Activities For Soft Components”Infrastructure Evaluation

“Hard Activities For Soft Components”

• Management Culture – Code of Ethics, Human

Resources Practices • Goals and Obstacles – Objectives, Financial

Planning and Analysis, Hard-Coded Response Systems (Law, Finance, HR Department)

• Communication & Information – Clear Authority/Responsibility Lines, Standard Financial Close/Reporting Practices, Disclosure Controls, Whistleblower Process, “Open Door” Policies

Page 19: All panelists

19

What Do COSO Components Mean?

What Do COSO Components Mean?

• Control Environment – Organization’s Ethics, Tone At Top, Management Philosophy and Style, Commitment to Competence – Management Culture

• Risk Assessment – How Organization Routinely

ID’s and Manages Risks – Goals and Obstacles• Information and Communication –

Identifying, Capturing, and Communicating Relevant Data in a Form and Time Frame To Meet Associates

Page 20: All panelists

20

Infrastructure Evaluation“Hard Activities For Soft Components”Infrastructure Evaluation

“Hard Activities For Soft Components”

• Management Culture – Code of Ethics, Human

Resources Practices • Goals and Obstacles – Objectives, Financial

Planning and Analysis, Hard-Coded Response Systems (Law, Finance, HR Department)

• Communication & Information – Clear Authority/Responsibility Lines, Standard Financial Close/Reporting Practices, Disclosure Controls, Whistleblower Process, “Open Door” Policies

Page 21: All panelists

21

Evaluation of How Well the “Soft” Components Are

Working

Evaluation of How Well the “Soft” Components Are

Working

Possible Methods -

• Internal Control Questionnaires

• Control Self Assessments

• Survey Employees, Management Assesses Survey Results

Page 22: All panelists

22

ControlControl

Intern

al

Intern

al System

SystemSurveysSurveys

Action PlansAction Plans

Knowledgeable Knowledgeable Fact-based Fact-based AssertionsAssertions

ControlControlSelfSelfAssessmentsAssessments InterviewsInterviews

CompleteCompleteContinuousContinuousMonitoringMonitoring

DirectorsDirectorsBoar

dBoar

dofofAwarenessAwareness

404 404 CertificationsCertifications IdentificationIdentification

Company-wideCompany-wide FrameworkFramework

Page 23: All panelists

23

More Information on Survey Method

More Information on Survey Method

• “Internal Reflections”, The Internal Auditor, December 2002, Pp. 56-63

• “Internal Audit’s Role in Corporate Governance: Sarbanes Oxley Compliance”, IIA Website (IIARF Master Key)– ALLTel Control and Risk Assessment

– El Paso Internal Control Assessment Survey

Page 24: All panelists

24

Control ActivitiesControl Activities

Ray Lukas, CPA

Director , Global Risk Management Solutions

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Page 25: All panelists

25

Control ActivitiesControl Activities

Control Activities

•Policies and procedures that ensure management directives are carried out.

•Range of activities including approvals, authorizations, verifications, recommendations, performance reviews, asset security and segregation of duties.

Page 26: All panelists

26

Integration With Risk AssessmentIntegration With Risk Assessment

• Along with assessing risks, management should identify the actions needed to address identified risks.

• These actions serve to focus attention on the control activities needed to ensure that such actions are appropriately carried out in a timely manner

Page 27: All panelists

27

Integration With Risk AssessmentIntegration With Risk Assessment

• Control activities are the means by which an enterprise strives to achieve its stated business objectives

– Control activities serve as the primary mechanism used by management to monitor performance to achieve business objectives, and

– Control activities are more effective when built directly into the management process

Page 28: All panelists

28

Types of Control ActivitiesTypes of Control Activities

• Numerous types of control activities, including:– Preventative controls

– Detective controls

– Manual controls

– Computer controls, and

– Management controls

• Control activities usually involve two distinct elements:– Policy that establishes “what should be done”, and

– Procedures that entail specific actions to be taken to comply with the policy

Essential element of control activities/procedures performed is that issues identified as a result of such procedures be investigated and appropriate corrective actions taken

Page 29: All panelists

29

Types of Control ActivitiesTypes of Control Activities

• Control Activities are performed by personnel at various levels in the organization– Top Level Review – Actual performance to budget

and forecast– Direct Functional or Activity Management – daily,

weekly an/or monthly review of performance by direct reports (supervisors & managers)

– Information Processing – controls designed to check accuracy, completeness and authorization of transactions

Page 30: All panelists

30

Types of Control ActivitiesTypes of Control Activities

• Control Activities are performed by personnel at various levels in the organization (continued)– Physical Controls – Physical security and periodic

counting of hard assets (Cash, Inventory, equipment, etc.)

– Performance Indicators – Analytical reviews, where differences are investigated and corrective actions taken, and

– Segregation of Duties – Incompatible duties are separated among different people to reduce risk of error or inappropriate actions

Page 31: All panelists

31

Application to Sarbanes 404Application to Sarbanes 404

Level 1 – Unreliable• Unpredictable environment where control activities are not designed or in place

Level 2 – Informal• Disclosure Activities and Controls are designed and in place but are not adequately documented• Controls mostly dependent on people• No formal training or communication of control activities

Level 3 – Standardized• Control activities are designed and in place• Control activities have been documented and communicated to employees• Deviations from control activities will likely not be detected

Level 4 – Monitored• Standardized controls with periodic testing for effective design and operation with reporting to management• Automation and tools may be used in a limited way to support control activities

Level 5 – Optimized• An integrated internal control framework with real time monitoring by management with continuous improvement (Enterprise Wide Risk

Management)• Automation and tools are used to support controls activities and allow the organization to make rapid changes to the control activities if needed

Optimized

- Integrated internal controls with real time monitoring by management and continuous improvement

Monitored

- Standardized controls with periodic testing for effective design and operation with reporting to management

Standardized

- Control activities are designed, in place and are adequately documented

Informal- Control activities

are designed and in place but are not adequately documented

Unreliable- Unpredictable

environment where control activities are not designed or in place

Management 404 Internal Control Assertion

Page 32: All panelists

32

Application to Sarbanes 404Application to Sarbanes 404

Accuracy of Input: All errors in data are detected when recorded, accepted by the system, or converted to system-readable format.

What ensures that the fee and amount of the services provided are correct?

What ensures that the invoice represents the actual services provided?

Control Noted

There is a programmed procedure that will only allow to invoice a customer for the services described on the bill. An invoice will not be generated for that appointment until the services on the bill agree to the service on the schedule logging system.

Through a programmed procedure, invoices are priced using the contract assigned to that customer or the default price assigned to that customer in the customer contract pricing database. However, anyone that can manually enter a service provider can manually enter a different fee, thus overriding the contracted fee arrangement.

There is a programmed procedure that will only allow to invoice a customer for the services on the bill. However, there is no control to ensure that all services provided were logged on to the service invoice.

Y

N

N

Every night there is a manual reconciliation of the number of Service Appointments that day to the number of appointments invoiced. This is part of the balancing procedures performed by the data center over nightly batch jobs. Approximately 70% of these invoices are transmitted to the customers electronically via EDI. A manual reconciliation is done to check that all invoices sent to EDI were received by EDI. EDI customers must acknowledge that they have received invoices. If customer acknowledgements are not received, the analysts follow up with the customers. The remaining 30% of the invoices are sent through regular mail.

YCompleteness of Input: All appropriate data are entered into the system and accepted for processing. Data rejected by the system are reported, investigated, corrected and re-entered.

 

What ensures that a service invoice is generated for service provided?

 

What ensures that a services provided cannot be invoiced twice?

Control Objective Control? Control Activities/Procedures

Invoicing

BUSINESS PROCESS FOCUS AREA

Page 33: All panelists

33

MonitoringMonitoring

Andrew Bellenkes, CPA

Senior Auditor

VF Corporation

Page 34: All panelists

34

COSO Model - Monitoring Component

COSO Model - Monitoring Component

Ongoing Monitoring - Management, supervisory, and other monitoring activities in the ordinary course of operations that assess the quality of internal controls

Separate Monitoring - Evaluation focusing directly on system effectiveness with a scope and frequency dependent on the assessment of risks, and ongoing monitoring

Reporting Deficiencies - Upstream reporting of internal control deficiencies, with certain matters reported to top management and the board

Page 35: All panelists

35

SEC Final Ruling - Monitoring

SEC Final Ruling - Monitoring

• Recognized control framework must be used as the basis of evaluation

• Sufficient procedures to evaluate the design and the test of internal controls over financial reporting

• Evidentiary matter must be maintained

• Quarterly evaluation of changes to internal controls over financial reporting

• Certifications mandated by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as exhibits to annual, semi-annual and quarterly reports must be filed

Points of Focus...

Page 36: All panelists

36

Monitoring ComponentMonitoring Component

COSO Model

• Risk Assessment

• Monitoring

VF Hybrid Model

• Goals & Objective Setting

• Monitoring & Assessment

Page 37: All panelists

37

Essential Elements of Effective Monitoring

Essential Elements of Effective Monitoring

• Scope Changes

• Evidentiary Support- SEC Rules

- Archiving, Record Retention,

Rollover to the Next Period

• Training

• Internal Audit’s Role

• Extent/Vigor of Quarterly Assessments

Page 38: All panelists

38

Internal Audit Project Office

Corporate Controller’s Office

European Business Units

Asian Business Units

Domestic & Americas Business Units

Roles in Monitoring ControlsRoles in Monitoring Controls

Page 39: All panelists

39

Roles in Monitoring ControlsRoles in Monitoring Controls… Project Office/Internal Audit/Corporate Controller’s Office

Project Office• Corporate Communication• Training• Systems Administration (for internal controls

documentation database used)

Internal Audit• Review of Self-Testing by the Business Units• Coordination and Performance of Testing (for

external audit reliance, except for exempt areas)

Page 40: All panelists

40

Roles in Monitoring ControlsRoles in Monitoring Controls… Project Office/Internal Audit/Corporate Controller’s Office

Corporate Controller’s Office• Policies and Procedures Statements• Internal Control Design and Implementation• Technical Guidance

Page 41: All panelists

41

Roles in Monitoring ControlsRoles in Monitoring Controls

VF Risk CommitteeCorporate CFO - Chair

Project OfficeGeneral Auditor, Corporate

Controller, Internal Audit, Finance

External Advisory

VF JeanswearBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF ImagewearBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF IntimatesBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF OutdoorBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF EuropeBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF CorporateBU Owner

BU Coordinator

VF Services FI/HRBU Owner

BU Coordinator

*Issue resolution:Ownership of finalaccountingdeterminations

… the Organization

VF ASIA /GSOBU Owner

BU Coordinator

Acquisition(s)?

VF IS/ITBU Owner

Page 42: All panelists

42

Roles in Monitoring ControlsRoles in Monitoring ControlsVF Risk Committee

Corporate CFO - Chair

Project OfficeGeneral Auditor, Corporate

Controller, Internal Audit, Finance

MaltaLocation Coordinator

UKLocation Coordinator

ItalyLocation Coordinator

VF EuropeBU Owner

BU Coordinator

GermanyLocation Coordinator

… VF Europe

BelgiumLocation Coordinator

PolandLocation Coordinator

Page 43: All panelists

43

Ongoing Monitoring Ongoing Monitoring … VF Methodology

• Ongoing Business Unit testing

• Integrated internal audit approach to test Business Unit compliance with Section 404 vs. Stand- alone audits of Accounting and Financial Reporting internal controls

• Quarterly certifications from Business Unit CFOs and CIOs

Page 44: All panelists

44

SummarySummary

• Analysis and assessment of soft controls is as critical as analysis and assessment of hard controls.

• Need for evaluation controls that span all five components of COSO.

• Business unit management owns the monitoring function.


Recommended