ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
1, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
2, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter -1
Background and Introduction
1.1 Background of IWMP Watershed Project-
Land and water are essential elements for the sustainability of the human being. Indiscriminate
exploitation, injudicious and reckless use of resources for food, fodder and fuel has resulted in
excessive soil erosion, deforestation and moisture stress. The end of result is resource poor
situation leading to reduced food, fodder and fuel productivity.Again, when soil gets eroded and
water run-off, life of the poor farmers becomes measurable We have now reached such a
situation, where unless we think of a scientific approach, we may loose the vital resources for all
time to come . In order to save the two basic resources i.e. soil and water and at thesame time to
increase the production of our requirement of food, fodder and fuel in a sustainable basis, we
have to take up development of land and management of water resources on watershed.
Watershed Development program running in India from more than 40 years and recognized as a
key instrument for holistic development of village. There has been changes in the guidelines in
the watershed program on regular interval for improve the quality and for sustainability of the
program.
If we look over the history of the watershed program in India, we found that the concept and
adoption of watershed development methodology has been defined & redefined through trials
and errors, learning from successes & failures and considering the resource position and stake
holders’ aspiration. Watershed management is no longer the exclusive domain of soil & water
conservationists, it now needs equal contribution from social scientists, doctors and experts of
other disciplines also. It is not now a single way to see watershed program as a geohydoological
unit but there is urgent need to look watershed project as a key instrument for holistic
development of area with special focus on intregrating farming sector and livelihoods of the
assetless and backward community.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
3, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India is
implementing a centrally Sponsored Scheme of “Integrated Watershed Management
Program” (IWMP) in the country from XIth plan. The major objective behind the watershed
development approach is to enhance and stabilize production through improved technology and
efficient use of natural resources for over all development of inhabitants of the watershed. The
latest “Common Guidelines” for IWMP has been formulated on the experiences of 14 years of
all stakeholders’ ministries. The focus of IWMP is to improve rural livelihoods through
participatory watershed development with focus on integrated farming system for enhancing
income, productivity and livelihood security in a sustainable manner. In the common
guidelines special emphasis is given on quality and realisytic DPR to be preparing through
participatory manner in facilitation of Watershed Development Team (WDT) for project period.
1.2 Location of Watershed Project
The project is located in the Ajmer district which is historical district and heart of Rajasthan. The
watershed project area is located approximately 15 km from Kekri on 3 km interior side of the
state highway 26. The watershed projects villages are spread in the area cover almost 12 km
maximum length from ALOLI to Mehrokhurd and 15 km width i.e Deopura to Sadri. The
project villages are located approximately in range of 12 to 25 km from block headquarter the
project and district head quarter Ajmer is located 95-120 km from the project villages.
The IWMP ALOLI watershed project area is situated between 26°06’00’’ to 26°11'26’’ North
Latitude and 74°38' 34’’ to 75°45'48’’ East longitude. Project area is bounded in the three sides
by the area of Kekri block and one side by Shahpura block of Bhilwara district.
Kekri
Nasirabad Kota
Location of Project Area
State Highway-26K
Project area
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
4, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-1 General Features of ALOLI Watershed Project
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
5, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Name of Project ALOLI Watershed , IWMP- VI
Name of Program IWMP
Location 26°06’00’’ to 26°11'26’’ North Latitude and
74°38' 34’’ to 75°45'48’’ East longitude
Block Kekri
Type of project Others
District Ajmer
Total Villages 10
Total Gram Panchayat 6
Micro and Macro 4, 8
Total Watershed Committee 6
Duration Six Years (2010-11 to 2015-16)
Total Geographical Area 6207 Ha
Sanction Area 6207 Ha
Area available for treatment 6207 Ha
Total Sanction Cost 744.8 Lakhs
Proposed Budget on Works 558.60 Lakhs
Proposed budget on NRM 417. Lakhs
Proposed budget on Productivity Enhace. 74.48 Lakhs
Proposed Budget on Livelihood Enhance. 67.03 Lakhs
Cost Per Ha (consolidated ) 14300 per Ha
Cost per Ha (IWMP project ) 12000 per Ha
From Project Cost 744.84 Lakhs
From Convergence 142.8 Lakhs
Ratio of convergence 16%
Agro climate zone III -A
Major crops Jowar, Bajra, Pulses, Wheat, Maize, Barley,
Castor, Urad, Oil Seed
Slope range 1-3 %
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
6, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
River Basin BANAS
Major soil type Clay, Loamy clay
Rainfall( Average) 525 mm
Majority of caste SC
Per capita of land 1.35 ha
Literacy rate 48 %
Small and Marginal farmers 72 %
Major option of livelihoods Agriculture, Dairy, Wage
Water table 25 meter
Source of drinking water Hand pump, Public drinking water system
Quality of drinking water Flurodie
Irrigation source Open well and Pond
Cattle Cow and Buffalo
Nearest town Kekri
Name of PIA AEN, Panchayat Samiti, Kekri, Ajmer
Coordinating Person from PIA Ramanand Chutervedi
Address (HO) Office of the Panchyat SamitiHead Quarter –Kekri Distrit –Ajmer
DWDU Project Manager, Soil and Water Conservation
Building, Chorisawad road, Ajmer
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
7, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table -2 Detail of Project Area
S. No
Name of Village
Gram Panchayat
Total Geographical area
Area Propose under Watershed
Total treatable area
Area Not available for treatment
1 Sadara Sadara 716 716 716 Nil
2 Sadari Sadara 561 561 561
3 ALOLI ALOLI 863 863 863
4 Balapura Mehrukalan 614 614 614
5 Nayagaon Mehrukalan 547 547 547
6 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 2114 2114 2114
7 Gothara Piplaj 436 436 436
8 Deopura Kadera 100 100 100
9 Amli Gordha 105 105 105
10 Mehrukalan Gordha 151 151 151
Total 6207 Ha 6207 Ha 6207 Ha Total
Table-3 Micro watershed versus project villages
Macro No Micro Village Gram Panchayat Hq.11 1 Devpura Kadera 698
1 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan
1 Balapura Mehrukalan
3 Devpura Kadera 482
3 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan
3 Balapura Mehrukalan
4 Ghotra Piplaj 297
4 Amli Ghordha
12 1 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 905
1 Balapura Mehrukalan
2 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 3085
2 Aloli Aloli
2 Sadara Sadara
22 1 Ghotra Piplaj 520
1 Balapura Mehrukalan
2 Amli Ghordha 222
2 Mehrukhurd Ghordha
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
8, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
11.25
7.77
4.78
14.5849.70
8.38
3.54
Macro and Micro wise allocation of area
11/1 11/2 11/4 12/1 12/2 22/1 22/2
Project area is delienetaed into
three macro and seven micro
watershed projects. The maximum
area is covered under 12/2 micro
watershed and minimum area is
covered by 22/2 micro watershed.
The administrative set up of
project area of 6207 ha area is
divided into six gram Panchayat
and ten villages.
1.3 About Detail Project Report (DPR)
A DPR describe what a Watershed Project will try to achieve over a tenure of watershed project
of 4 to 7 years and how it intends to achieve it. DPR is containing the general features of the
watershed project, contain an analysis of the current situations of watershed project area and
particularly needs of the community with respect to land and water and existing potential in the
project area. ALOLI watershed project of Kekri block of Ajmer district is proposed for six years
duration (2010-11 to 2015-16).
1.4 Objectives of DPR-
PIA decided the following objectives for the DPR.
To prepare a Simple, Logical, Community Friendly and Comprehensive Detail Project
Report through following community base participatory approaches involving all
segments of communities and stakeholders.
To develop a livelihood plan through livelihood analysis for optimum utilization of scarce
available resources viz natural, physical, human and financial and analysis of vulnerability
in the project.
To develop a management grid for convergence with other department and their
authorities for pool out the financial resources in the project area.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
1.5 Methodology adopted –The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.
1. Rapport building in the project area
project area to understand the communities. De
communities, their culture, socio economic status and project a
helped to establish rapport in the project area. It is not a tough task because PIA is already
working in the project area fo
2. Organized Village Meetings
Panchayat levels to aware the communities about the watershed project. Senior officers
from the PIA also attended the meeting to motivate
the project
3. Base Line Survey- WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with
support of volunteers. The data collected related to socio
every individual collected in the
project staff by visiting sample households giving priority to poor households belonging to
SC and ST communities.
Primary Data
9, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.
Rapport building in the project area – WDT members devoted sincere efforts in the
project area to understand the communities. Describe about the project and understand the
communities, their culture, socio economic status and project area. 3-4
helped to establish rapport in the project area. It is not a tough task because PIA is already
working in the project area for execution of other rural schemes.
Organized Village Meetings – PIA organized few meetings at village level and gram
Panchayat levels to aware the communities about the watershed project. Senior officers
from the PIA also attended the meeting to motivate the community and develop the faith in
WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with
support of volunteers. The data collected related to socio-economic status of each and
every individual collected in the prescribed format. Triangulation of the data made by the
project staff by visiting sample households giving priority to poor households belonging to
SC and ST communities.
Source of Data Collection
PRA Tools
House Hold survey
Scientific methods
Census records
Reports of line departments
e-literature
Secondary Data
DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.
WDT members devoted sincere efforts in the
scribe about the project and understand the
4 months efforts
helped to establish rapport in the project area. It is not a tough task because PIA is already
meetings at village level and gram
Panchayat levels to aware the communities about the watershed project. Senior officers
the community and develop the faith in
WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with
economic status of each and
prescribed format. Triangulation of the data made by the
project staff by visiting sample households giving priority to poor households belonging to
SC and ST communities.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
10, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Process of PIA for village entry
4. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) – PIA carried out PRA in the every project villages
of the project area to ensure the participation and develop of ownership of project
community with the watershed project. Various tools were used with the communities
which help to aware the PIA about the available resources, identification of problems, their
prioritization, analysis and optimal solution to solve the problems. The most common tool
was FGD used to familiar with many issues relevant to the project.
5. Develop thematic layers of watershed project- Directorate of Watershed, Jaipur
nominated the PD-CORE for develop the thematic layer of the watershed project by using
GIS and remote sensing technology. These maps help to understand the basic
characteristics of the watershed project. The detail is given in coming chapter.
6. Desk Research - A systematic and focused desk research and internet assisted search for
relevant documents, reports, appraisals reviewed during preparation of DPR.
7. Processing and Analysis of Data - All the collected information from the primary and
secondary sources, desk reviews was analyzed and calibrated. The finding of the analysis
data have been used for develop vision document, strategy and action plan of the project
8. Writing of DPR- A comprehensive report developed by the PIA by following the
prescribed DPR template by the directorate.
9. Approval from Gram Sabha – PIA submitted the DPR in the concern Gram Sabha and
shared the activity plan. After approval of Gram Sabha, it was submitted to Jila Parishad
for approval by the district level committee.
Meeting with key
stakeholders
Individual contacts and meeting in
small groups
IEC methods for rapport
building
Villagemeeting
Gram Sabha at GP level
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
11, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.6 Limitations
The team of WDT enjoyed the working in preparing the watershed development treatment
plan however; the whole process had few limitations which reflect the process and progress of
the report.
1. The time duration allocated for the task was too short to deal with many intricate processes
to fine tune planning process.
2. Data collection from various sources spent most of the time of DPR preparation process.
3. Lack of inadequate data, delay in providing of data and unavailability of data were also a
key limitation for the PIA.
4. There was a general lack of response from the departments/individuals on request of WDT
members for providing of data but they were quite forthcoming in providing information’s
when WDT team visited.
5. It is possible that household format and PRA raised the expectations among local
community, which it may not be within the reach of PIA to fulfill the expectation of
everybody.
6. Capacity of WDT is also a limitation. They are fresher and new in the field of watershed
development.
Despite the these limitations, WDT team tried to capture the essence of the peoples aspirations
and hopes in the project area of Ajmer district and comprehend the grand vision in
consonance with current thinking
1.7 Delineation of Area- ALOLI watershed project is delineated in three macro and seven micro
watershed projects. The detail of villages and area in micro watershed has already mentioned in
table. The project area is divided into ten villages under six gram panchyats. The maximum area
covered under Mehru Kalan gram panchyat followed by Sadara, ALOLI, Piplaj, Gordha and
Kadera. The biggest village is Mehrukalan in the project area and smallest village in terms of
area is Deopura. The figure and data is mentioned below to prove the statement.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
12, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 4 Detail of gram panchyats in project area S.No Name of GP Area % of area Sanction cost (Rs
in Lakhs)
1 Sadara 1277 20.57 153.24
2 ALOLI 863 13.90 103.56
3 Mehrukalan 3275 52.78 393
4 Kadera 100 1.61 12
5 Piplaj 436 7.02 52.32
6 Goradha 256 4.12 30.72
Total 6207 100 744.84
20.57
13.9
52.76
1.617.02
4.12
Classification of area among gram panchyats
Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Kadera Piplaj Goradha
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
13, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.8 Administrative Setup of District
Ajmer, formerly written as Ajmeru is a city in ajmer district in Rajasthan state surrounded by
Aravali mountains, this is the city ruled by great “Parthvi Raj Singh Chouhan “ It is situated in
the heart of Rajasthan. The district is known for Khwaja Moinuddhin Chisti’s Dargah and
religious Pushkar town, where temple of Lord Bhrama, is situated.
The district is situated between 25°38’00’’ and 26°58'06’’ North Latitude and 73°54' 00’’ to
75°22'00’’ East longitude covering geographical area of 8,481 sq km. It is bounded on north by
Naguar, on the south by Bhilwara, on the east by Jaipur and west by Pali district. Name of Ajmer
is derived from Ajeymeru (the invincible hill). Administratively Ajmer district is part of Ajmer
division and it is divided four sub division and into six tehsil Ajmer, Nasirabad, Beawar, Kekri,
Kishangarh and Sarwar. The Ajmer district has been divided into 8 Panchyat samiti i.e Silora,
Pisangan, Binay, Masooda, Jawaja, Arain, Kekri abd Srinagar. Ajmer is having 1083 villages
and 276 gram Panchayat. Ajmer district comes under Ajmer division.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
14, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-5 Ajmer district at a glance
S.No Particular Unit Data
1 Total Geographical area Sq Km 8481
2 Sub division 10
3 Tehsil 10
4 Blocks 8
5 Gram Panchyats 276
6 Revenue villages 1022
7 Mean annual rainfall mm 633.9
8 Ranges of hills ARAVALI
9 River basin Banas,
10 Important rivers Khari, Dai
11 Populations (2001) Lakhs 21.80
12 Important lakes Buda pushkar, Pushkar, Anasagar
13 Cultivable area % 77.06%
14 forest area % 6.49%
15 uncultivable area % 16.40
16 Principal crops Jowar, Bajra, Pulses, Wheat, Maize, Barley,
Castor, Urad, Oil Seed
17 Source of irrigation Open well, Tube well, Pond, Canal,
1.9 Agro climate zone- The Rajasthan state has been divided into five divisions on the basis of
bio physical features, rainfall, soil profile and available water for irrigation. Three divisions have
been further divided due to diversification. The agro climate of the Ajmer district is
characterized by semi arid. It is moderate and healthy. The district has a hot, dry summer and
bracing cold season. The zone is comes under III A which name as dry semi arid flat land area.
54.6 % of total land of 29.48 lakh ha is comes under agriculture. Open well and talab are the key
source of irrigation.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
15, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-6 Characteristics of agro climate zone- III A
Total area Net sown
area
Districts Rainfall
range
Max and
Min
Temp
Major crops Soil
29.48 lac
Ha
54.5 % Ajmer
Jaipur,
Tonk,
Dausa
500-600
mm
50 deg
cen. to 4
deg cen.
Bajra ,Moong,
Gram, Jowar,
Wheat,
Sandy
loam
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
16, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.10 Climate and Rainfall
Mean annual rainfall (2000-2011) of the project area is 524 mm which is close to the average
rainfall of 472 mm. The number of rainy days varies between 6 to 22 in monsoon period but
average rainy days are 11. If we ignore the last two years good rainfall, the mean rainfall of the
area of last one decade is only 376 mm.
The analysis of data gives the impression that almost 95% of the total annual rainfall is received
during the southwest monsoon, which enters the district in the last week of June and withdraws
in the middle of September. Probability of average annual rainfall exceeding 500 mm is only
10%. However, there is 90% probability that the average rainfall will be more than 300 -450mm.
The probability of occurrence of mean annual rainfall is 30-50%. Drought analysis based on
agriculture criteria indicates that the district is prone to mild and normal type of droughts.
Occurrence of severe and very severe type of drought is rare. January is the coldest month with
mean maximum and minimum temperatures being lowest at 22.20
C & 4.50
C. Temperature in
summer month, June, reaches up to 460
C. There is drop in temperature due to onset of monsoon
and rises again in the month of September. Atmosphere is generally dry except during the
monsoon period. The humidity is highest in August with mean daily relative humidity 80%.
If we just analysis the data of last 11 years , we found that four times project area got under good
rainfall and three times and under deficit rainfall otherwise four times rains occur to near to
normal rainfall of project area.
Table- 7 Rainfall of Project area
Year 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Rainfall (mm) 1069 734 438 336 442 384
No of Rainy days 22 15 6 12 11 9
Year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
Rainfall (mm) 406 697 476 213 601 495
No of Rainy days 10 11 10 05 11 11
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
17, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 8 Maximum rainfall intensity Duration Rainfall intensity
(mm)
15 min duration 65 mm
30 min duration 72 mm
60 min duration 100 mm
Table- 9 Temperature of season in project area Season Max(degree
centigrade)Min (degree centigrade)
Summer 49.2 32
Winter 28 5.2
Rainy 38 15
1069
734
438336
442384406
697
476
213
601495
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Rainfall pattern of last 10 years of project area
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
18, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.11 Infrastruture facility in project area
Table -11 Infrastructure Facilities –
Infr
astr
uctu
re S
adar
a
Sad
ri
AL
OL
I
Bal
apur
a
Nay
agao
n
Meh
ruka
lan
Got
hara
Deo
puar
a
Am
li
Meh
rakh
urd
PHC √Post office √ √ √Telephone √ √ √ √ √ √ √Aganwadi √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Primary school √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Secondary school √ √ √Ration shop √ √ √ √
Tape connection √Veterinary hospital √Bank √LAMPS √Cooperative √ √BMC Patwar circle √ √ √Gravel road √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Damar road √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Railway station Police station Dairy √ √ √
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
19, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table –12 Detail of roads available in project area Type of road Length (KM)
National Highway Nil
Major road 12.64
Medium road 50.70
Other road 92.97
Village road 33.42Note- jAIPUR-Shahpura-Bhilwara has declared as highway and work is under process. Project area is located on the way of Kekri-Shahpura road.
Infrastructure facilities in the project area are remarkably poor in the project area. The available
infrastructure in the project area is mentioned above in the table, it shows that Mehrukalan is the
only project villages which has comparatively better position and have necessary facilities
otherwise majority of project villages are suffer due to lack of facilities.
The condition of roads from the Kekri towards any side is extremely poor except towards
Nasirabad. Nearest highway is national highway 12 which is at Deoli 40 km from project area.
1.12 Institution at project level
Strong Institutions are the key factor for sustainability of any project. The five institutions
formed at project level are described below.
Project Implementing Agency (PIA)
Watershed Development Team (WDT)
Self Help Groups (SHGs)
Users Group (UGs)
Watershed Committee (WC)
1.12.1About Project Implementing Agency (PIA) – Jila Parishad, DWDC Ajmer appointed
Assistant Engineer, Kekri Panchayat Samiti as the PIA of the IWMP-VI, ALOLI watershed
project.
ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer
20, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 13 Detail of PIA
Name of PIA Assistant Engineer, Panchyat Samiti Kekri
Name of chief functionary Sh R. N. Chutervedi
Designation A. En. Panchayat Samiti Kekri
Department Watershed Development & Soil Conservation.
Office address Panchayat Samiti, Kekri
Phone 01467-220015, 9530300242
Mail id [email protected],[email protected]
1.12.2Watershed Development Team (WDT) - WDT is the pillar of any watershed project.
PIA recruited dedicated team of young professionals of four member’s team in multidisciplinary
field. The brief detail is given below in the table. The table shows that one member in the team
are female in field of sociology. The team is new in the field but highly committed and
dedicated for the watershed project.
Table- 14 Brief detail of WDT team for IWMP-X watershed project
S. Name of member Sex Age Designation Qualification Experience
1 Bijendra Kumar M 30 Engineering Diploma 12 Months
2 Om Prakash Sharma M 26 Agriculture B.SC(Ag) 15 Months
3 Deo raj Pareek M 24 Veterinary Diploma( AH) 16 Months
4 Meena Mali F 22 Social science B.A in sociology
15 Months
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
21, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.12.3 About DWDC- The unit at district level looking after the IWMP is called DWDC. The
office of DWDU is located in the Jila Parishad, Collectorate Ajmer managed by XEN (Land
resources). DWDU is currently looking after 18 IWMP watershed projects in the district.
Table -15 Detail of DWDU
Name of DWDU Executive Engineer (Land Resources)
District Ajmer
Name of chief functionary Sh Kan Singh Solanki
Designation Project Manager DWDU
Total staff available 10
Technical staff 3
Supporting staff 7
Address Project Manager ( IWMP ),DWDU Chorasiawas Road, Ajmer
Telephone No 0145-2641329
E mail [email protected]
1.12.4 About SLNA – This is the apex body at state level. Directorate of Watershed
Development and Soil Conservation (WD & SC) is the playing the role of SLNA in the
Rajasthan
Table –16 Detail of SLNA
Name of SLNA Directorate, Watershed Development & Soil Conservation
State Rajasthan
Name of chief functionary Mrs. Pramila Surana
Designation Chief Executive Officer cum Director
Address Pant Krishi Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
Date of notification 3/2/2009
Chairperson Sh S. Ahmed, Additional chief secretary
Telephone No 0141-2227189
Fax No. 0141-2227858
E mail [email protected]
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
22, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1.12.5 Sub Committee Watershed - (WC)-
As per envisaged in the common guidelines that Watershed committee would be formed at Gram
Panchayat level in the Gram Sabha in a democratic manner by ensure the active involvement and
participation of all segment of society. WDT team will provide the technical support in
formation of the watershed committee. In the Rajasthan, Directorate of Watershed and Soil
conservation, state government did few amendments in the favor of strengthening Panchayati raj
system.
1. WC declared as a subcommittee-Watershed of the Gram Panchayat and work in control and
closed supervision of Gram Panchayat.
2. Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat is declared and included in the watershed committee along with
Chairman and secretary of the watershed committee. Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat replace by
the chairperson as one of the signatory of the watershed committee.
3. No need for registration of the subcommittee under any legal act.
PIA constituted six WC (Sub committee- Watershed) one each at Gram Panchayat in the ALOLI
watershed project. The committee constituted in the gram sabha organized in the village. The
members of the committee selected through democratic manner. The important thing to consider
is that responsibilities of two designation discharge by one person i.e in this particular watershed
project, Sarpanch of the gram panchyat also act as a chair person of the watershed committee.
During selection of committee it was taking care of fulfillment of norms of the guidelines. The
gram sabha organized after series of village meetings in the village. The representatives from
SHG, UG, and GP were covered. Women were also included in the watershed committee.
The table given below reveal the fact female representation is good and as per norms of the
guidelines. Table gives no idea about the reperesentaion of the small and marginal farmers but
PIA assured the representation of SHGs and UGs in the watershed committee. The caste wise
analysis is also given in the table however SC/ST ratio is less as compare to their population in
the project area.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
23, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-17 Analysis of watershed committee
Name of GP Total members Male Female SC/ST OBC Others
Sadara 13 7 6 2 6 5
Mehru Kalan 15 9 6 1 4 10
ALOLI 13 8 5 4 4 5
Kadera 13 11 2 4 2 4
Peeplaj 10 8 2 2 4 4
Gordha 13 10 3 3 7 3
Table-18 Sub Watershed Committee- SadaraName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri , Bank Name A/C No. 6882000100005804
S.No
Name of Member
Sex
Father/Husband
Category Qualification Representative Designation
1 Smt Sayari devi F Kana Bheel ST VIII Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Mahendra singh M Sangram singh Gen B.A Elected Secretary
3 Rakesh M Bhawar Lal Gen XII UGs Member
4 Kailash chand M bhawar lal Gen B.A UGs Member
5 Narayan lal M Mahaveer sadhu
OBC X UGs Member
6 Satya Narayan M Kana kahar OBC X UGs Member
7 Ram dhan M Salag gurjar OBC X UGs Member
8 Badami bai F Madho meena ST III SHGs Member
9 Kanta devi F Narayan sadhu OBC II SHGS Member
10 Pushpa F Gajendra garj Gen B.A UGs Member
11 Beena F Kialash rajawat
OBC VIII SHG Member
12 Shakuntala F Gopal sadhu OBC IX SHG Member
13 Deoraj pareek M R.R Pareek Gen B.A WDT Member
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
24, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-19 Sub Watershed Committee- Mehru Kalan Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100005318
S.No
Name of Member
Sex Father/Husband Category Qualification
Representative
Designation
1 Kalu Ram M Teju Ram dhobi SC X Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Pratap singh M Satya Narayan singh
Gen B.A Elected Secretary
3 Ratan lal M Rama ji OBC XI UGs Member
4 Bhankar lal M Ramdev OBC X UGs Member
5 Suresh chand M Bhag chand Gen XI UGs Member
6 Dashrath M Mithun Lal Gen B.A UGs Member
7 Hari Ram M Madho ji OBC X UGs Member
8 Jitendra singh F Narendra singh Gen B.A SHGs Member
9 Saroj F Khem raj singh Gen X SHGS Member
10 Shushila F Durga lal Gen X UGs Member
11 Seema F Kishan ji Gen X SHG Member
12 Kanwari rathore F Narendra singh Gen X SHG Member
13 Manoj M Kishore sen OBC VIII SHG Member
14 Meena F Dalpat singh Gen X SHG Member
15 Deoraj pareek M R.R.Pareek Gen B.A WDT Member
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
25, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-20 Name of Gram Panchayat- ALOLIName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri Bank Name and A/C No. 6882000100008245
S.No
Name of Member
Sex Father/Husband
Category Qualification Representative
Designation
1 Mukesh M Rameshwar SC XI Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Indra pal M Ram meena ST B.A Elected Secretary
3 Chetan M Bhag chand Gen X UGs Member
4 Sukhlal M Kana ram gurjar
OBC X UGs Member
5 Badri Lal M Mohan lal SC VIII UGs Member
6 Urmila M Chetan prakash GEN X UGs Member
7 Rashmi M Bhawar lal OBC V UGs Member
8 Ram kumar F Ram kishan ST IX SHGs Member
9 Maina devi F Satya narayan OBC X SHGS Member
10 Kamla devi F Ladhu ram GEN X UGs Member
11 Shushila devi F Shankar lohar OBC X SHG Member
12 Surji devi F Gansh lal OBC X SHG Member
13 Deo raj pareek M R.R Pareek GEN B.A SHG Member
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
26, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-21 Sub Watershed Committee- KaderaName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100005309
S.No
Name of Member
Sex Father/Husband
Category Qualification
Representative
Designation
1 Kaushliya devi F Yogesh joshi GEN X Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Bhanwar lal M Mohan lal OBC B.A Elected Secretary
3 Ramdhan M Amba lal OBC XI UGs Member
4 Ramdhan M Surat mal OBC X UGs Member
5 Chotu lal M Rupa regar SC X UGs Member
6 Kaluram M Banshi gurjar OBC VIII UGs Member
7 Babu lal M Banna gurjar OBC IX UGs Member
8 Ratan lal M Ram lal OBC VIII SHGs Member
9 Sawar mal M Mahaveer Viashnav
GEN VIII SHGS Member
10 Amar chand M Bainath gurjar OBC V UGs Member
11 Hema devi F Baheru lal GEN IX SHG Member
12 Naurat mal M Rama bheel ST III SHG Member
13 Deo raj M R.P.Pareek GEN B.A SHG Member
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
27, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-22 Sub watershed committee- Peeplaj Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-KekriBank Name and A/C No. 6882000100005372
S.No Name of Member
Sex Father/Husband
Category Qualification
Representative
Designation
1 Santhosh devi M Panchu Lal SC X Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Ram pal M Ram balai SC B.A Elected Secretary
3 Bankari devi F Neha ram OBC X UGs Member
4 Jai singh M Bheru lodha OBC X UGs Member
5 Ram kishan M Shir ram lodha OBC XI UGs Member
6 Sita ram M Shankar lal OBC X UGs Member
7 Chagan lal M Hardeo meena ST X UGs Member
8 Lakehwar M Debi meena ST XI SHGs Member
9 Basanti F Bhag chand OBC X SHG Member
10 Deo raj M R.P. meena GEN B.A SHG Member
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
28, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-23 Sub Watershed Committee - Gordha Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100010174
S.No
Name of Member
Sex Father/Husband
Category Qualification
Representative Designation
1 Lakma M Rama balai SC VIII Sarpanch Chairperson
2 Madan Lal M Jagdish gurjar OBC B.A Elected Secretary
3 Krishna gopal M Ramnath OBC X UGs Member
4 Jagdish M Udha kanhar OBC IX UGs Member
5 Gheesa M Uma regar OBC X UGs Member
6 Gopal M Uma gurjar SC X UGs Member
7 Bajrang M Bheema OBC VIII UGs Member
8 Bhagwan swaroop
M Ramnath OBC XII SHGs Member
9 Gita F Ladho khati OBC X SHG Member
10 Asha F Mahendra SC X SHG Member
11 Anoop M Ram dhanu OBC X SHG Member
12 Shushila F Rameshwar GEN X SHG Member
13 Deoraj M R.D. Pareek GEN X WDT Member
1.12.6 Self Help Groups- The SHGs constituted in the project area from the project community
belong to SC/ST, BPL and small & marginal farmers. They are generally asset less person and
belong to the poorest of the poor community. SHGs provide a scope and optimum forum for
them to discuss on development issues and assure their involvement in decision making.
PIA did focus on identifying the existing SHGs and developed the list of existing SHGs available
in the project area on which PIA focus to revive in future of the non functioning SHGs and also
PIA will provide focus on the strengthening of the existing institutions.
In first step, SHGs were identified among the list of non functioning SHGs institutions those can
strengthen through facilitation of the project on some criteria’s.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
29, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
These SHGs would be link with the activities for income generation under livelihood component.
Efforts would be made to search out the sustainable solution. These group members are small
homogeneous group to be organized in future through saving and thrift activity after a certain
stage. Till writing of DPR, total 19 SHGs formed in the project area. Details of SHGs are given
in chapter-8 of the report. All SHGs are new, PIA did not identified any exiting SHGs to be
supported in future by the watershed project
Table-24 Detail of SHGs
Gram
Panchayat
Total
SHGs
Male
SHG
Female
member
Male
members
Female
member
Gordha 1 0 1 0 11
ALOLI 3 1 2 10 23
Kadera 1 0 1 0 13
Peeplaj 1 0 10 0 10
Sadara 10 0 10 0 105
Mehru Kalan 3 0 3 0 34
1.12.7 Users Group (UGs)
These are the homogeneous groups of the persons most affected by the activity implemented
under the project and having land holding in the project. PIA constituted activity wise users
groups (UGs) in the project area. The key responsibilities of the UGs are
To execute the work in the project
Post project management of the work
Judiciously use of the resources on common land
Operation and maintenance of the project
The UGs formed in the project are for the following activities
1. Arable land development
2. Non arable land development
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
30, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3. Pasture land development
4. Live stock management
5. DLT group
6. Horticulture group
7. Livelihoods
Table- 25 Detail of UGs
Name of gram panchyats No of Users
Group
Total
members
Type of groups Remarks
Gordha 6 30 Arable, Non
arable, DLT,
Pasture,
horticulture,
livestock,
Livelihoods,
Organic
Maximum 5
members in a
group, all are
male members
ALOLI 6 30
Kadera 6 30
Peeplaj 6 30
Sadara 6 30
Mehru Kalan 6 26
1.13 Problems and scope for improvement of the project area
PIA is working in the project area from a long time and very well aware about the problems
which are act as barrier in holistic development of the area. Key problems are mentioned below
in context of watershed program.
The livelihood status of the project communities may be improved by united efforts in an
intregrated manner with special focus on intregraing farming sector. Fortunately area has a lot of
scope and poteintial for soil and water conservation and productivit
sector. The strategy and plan is discussed further in the report.
1.14 SWOC analysis - (Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement
Development and Growth)
SWOC Analysis is an appraisal, planning and monitoring
situations and facilitates developing strategic decision logics. SWOC analysis of four major
sectors viz., Agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry and fisheries for project area is given
below:
Low literacy in project area
Low water productivity
Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture sector
Lack of employment opportunity for youth
Low productivity in agriculture sector and livestock
Comes under critical zone due to deepen water table
Farmer attitude towards crop diversification and pasture land
Lack of available fund to purchase quality input at time of requirement
Lack of institutional mechanism for collective efforts
Lack of infrastructure facilities avaiable for intregrated development of area
Large area under rainfed
Detail Project Report ALOLI
31, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The livelihood status of the project communities may be improved by united efforts in an
intregrated manner with special focus on intregraing farming sector. Fortunately area has a lot of
scope and poteintial for soil and water conservation and productivity enhancement of the farming
sector. The strategy and plan is discussed further in the report.
(Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement
SWOC Analysis is an appraisal, planning and monitoring tool used to understand and analyze
situations and facilitates developing strategic decision logics. SWOC analysis of four major
sectors viz., Agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry and fisheries for project area is given
Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture
Lack of employment opportunity for youth
Low productivity in agriculture sector and livestock
Comes under critical zone due to deepen water table
Farmer attitude towards crop diversification and pasture land
Lack of available fund to purchase quality input at time of requirement
Lack of institutional mechanism for collective efforts
Lack of infrastructure facilities avaiable for intregrated development of area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The livelihood status of the project communities may be improved by united efforts in an
intregrated manner with special focus on intregraing farming sector. Fortunately area has a lot of
y enhancement of the farming
(Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement
tool used to understand and analyze
situations and facilitates developing strategic decision logics. SWOC analysis of four major
sectors viz., Agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry and fisheries for project area is given
Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
32, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
1. Agriculture sub sector
Strength Weakness
1. Large sector (approximately more than
80-85% H/Hs) involve in agriculture
and allied sector.
2. Suitable and favorable agro climate
condition for pulses and oil seeds
3. Mechanized farming gaining
importance
1. Fragmented and low land holding
2. Under developed agriculture input storage facilities
and distribution network;
3. Inadequate availability of quality seeds and fertilizer
as per demand at time when required
4. Non receptiveness of local farming communities
towards improve technology and modern practices
Opportunity Challenges
1. Rain water harvesting for increasing
agriculture area through surface
water sources
2. Scope to increase the area under
organic farming
3. Strengtening the seed production
program
1. Market fluctuation for price rate
2. Erratic and uncertainty in rainfall
3. Ensure the availability of fertilizer and seeds at
government units
4. Disenchantment among youth farmers towards
agriculture as an occupation
2. Horticulture and Vegetable sector
Strength Weakness
Suitable agro climate conditions
Market is nearby available
Low adoption rate of MIS
Negligible area at present
Opportunities Challenges
Suitable agro – climate for a variety of
semi tropical, rainfed fruit and variety
of seasonal vegetables, spices, root and
tuber crops;
Change the farmers attitude and mindset towards
crop diversification
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
33, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3. Animal Husbandry sector
STRENGTH
Significant population of desi cattle
available
Good source of farm yard for promotion
of organic farming
WEAKNESSES.
Non descript local breed available of low milk
productivity.
Poor feeding management practices
Open grazing as common and significantly
prevalent practices
Inadequate available infrastructure
OPPORTUNITY
Scope to introduce localized breed
Potential to use large quantity of cattle
waste for bio energy
Develop the capacity of rural youth for
primary health treatment
Promotion of good quality fodder
cultivation
CHALLENGES
Market fluctuations
Recurring droughts in project area
Change the mind set of stereo minded
community
1.15 Goal of project
PIA has worked out on the en-visioning exercise and developed the strategies to achieve the goal
which was formulated in the Gram Sabha. The goal of the ALOLI – watershed is
The Vision is to improve the livelihood status of the project community by “adoption of
appropriate technology managemen and Good agriculture practices with special focus on soil
fertility, harnessing potential for dairy and inducing growth in farm economy by establishing
dynamic backward, forward, technical and financial linkages with higher markets and
institutions of leaning”.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
34, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Priority of the project
Motivate the farmers to improve soil health by following the recommendation of soil
health card
Promotion of green jobs works to sequester the carbon in the soil
Productivity enhancement of the agriculture sector by varietal change, adoption of
improve technology and practices
Motivate the farmers for crop diversification
Capacity building of farmers for GAP(good agriculture practices)
Improving water use efficiency
Alternate livelihood sources of the poor community members
Promotion of dairy program
Promotion of green jobs works to mitigate the effect and adapt with climate change
To secure livelihoods of the community of project area
Establish link for forward and backward linkages to provide good income to the farmers
Promotion of structure promote surface water bodies
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
35, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER -2
GENERAL FEATURES OF ALOLI
WATERSHED PROJECT
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
36, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter -2
General Profile of ALOLI Watershed Project
This chapter deals with general characteristics and gives an overall impression of ALOLI
watershed project and help to understand the project at a glance.
2.1 Need of ALOLI Watershed Project- Department of land resources developed 13 list of
indicators to facilitate the department for identification of the watershed project for treatment.
Panchayat Samiti, Kekri proposed the ALOLI watershed on the basis of same 13 parameters. A
composite index has been developed on the weight given. List of parameters and scoring against
each parameter is mentioned below in below paragraph. 103 weight age out of 150 shows the
need of the watershed project in the area. The main five reasons for selection of watershed
project in this area are in priority order
1. Contiguity to developed watershed area
2. Actual wages
3. Ground water status
4. Productivity potential
5. Area under rainfed
Table-26 Weight age Index
S. No.
Criteria Maximum score
Weight age
i Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 7.5
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 5
iii Actual wages 5 5
iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 5
v Ground water status 5 5
vi Moisture index/ 15 10
DPAP/ DDP Block
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
37, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 10
viii Drinking water 10 5
ix Degraded land 15 10
x Productivity potential of the land 15 10
xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated
10 10
xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 5
xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 5
Total 150 92.5
2.2 Demographic Detail
The total households of ALOLI watershed project area of the 10 villages in the project area is
3109. The table given below gives the impression that biggest village is Mehrukalan with 792
H/Hs (25.40 %) and Balapura is smallest village with 108 H/Hs (3.4%) in the project area. The
figure given below reveal the fact that SC % of population is maximum in Sadara village with
55.47% and minimum in Gothra village , followed by ST population in ALOLI village with
59.24% and minimum in Sadara village with 1.47%. OBC population is almost equially
distributed among all villages but maximum in Gothara village. The figure mentioned below
gives the impression that majority of population of the project area belong to SC (31%), followed
by ST (21.6%), OBC (14%) and other 33.3(%).
The total population of the 10 villages of the ALOLI watershed project area is 16913. The male
population percentage is 54.9% and female percentage is 45.1%. Sex ratio in project area is 825
female to 1000 male. The BPL population percentage in the project area is 14.45%.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
38, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-27 Demographic information of the ALOLI watershed
Name of Village Total H/Hs
Total family Total family
SC ST OBC Others BPL APL
Sadara 563 312 11 69 171 112 451
Sadari 220 60 83 23 54 34 186
ALOLI 476 132 282 18 44 70 406
Balapura 108 34 44 9 21 14 94
Nayagaon 223 50 60 33 80 16 207
Mehrukalan 792 184 81 158 369 116 676
Gothra 150 1 37 33 79 25 125
Deopura 113 37 6 21 49 46 67
Amli 339 109 43 56 131 13 326
Mehrukhurd 125 47 25 16 37 3 122
Total 3109 966 672 436 1035 449 2660
31
21.614
33.3
Caste Classification of Project area
SC ST OBC Others
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
39, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 28 Percentage wise analysis of caste of project villages
Name of village
SC ST OBC Others
Sadara 55.42 1.95 12.26 30.37
Sadari 27.27 37.73 10.45 24.55
ALOLI 27.73 59.24 3.78 9.24
Balapura 31.48 40.74 8.33 19.44
Nayagaon 22.42 26.91 14.80 35.87
Mehrukalan 23.23 10.23 19.95 46.59
Gothra 0.67 24.67 22.00 52.67
Deopura 32.74 5.31 18.58 43.36
Amli 32.15 12.68 16.52 38.64
Mehrukhurd 37.60 20.00 12.80 29.60
14.44
85.56
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
BPL APL
Well Being status of project area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
40, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table –29 Population data
Name of village Male Female Total Sadara 1606 1313 2919
Sadari 716 586 1302
ALOLI 1456 1191 2647
Balapura 353 288 641
Nayagaon 640 524 1164
Mehrukalan 2305 1886 4191
Gothra 471 386 857
Deopura 339 278 617
Amli 1043 872 1915
Mehrukhurd 363 297 660
Total 9292 7621 16913 Source- Panchayat samiti, Kekri
2.3 Land use – Land use is the most important feature of any watershed project. For ALOLI
watershed project, land use pattern is quite surprising which prove by the table given below.
Table- 30 Land Use Pattern of ALOLI Watershed Project (In Ha)Name of Villages
Total area
Arable Land Non Arable land
Cultivable Non Cultivable
Pasture Forest Others
Irrigated Non Irrigated
Sadara 716 156 261 106 121 72
Sadari 561 81 203 122 95 60
ALOLI 863 159 244 160 246 54
Balapura 614 145 300 112 35 22
Nayagaon 547 109 227 51 108 52
Mehrukalan 2114 426 913 239 322 214
Gothra 436 101 134 69 100 32
Deopura 100 20 44 18 - 18
Amli 105 14 32 11 48
Mehrukhurd 151 22 47 13 27 42
6207 1233 2405 901 1054 614
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
41, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
73.13
17
9.9
Land Ownership pattern of project area
Private GP Revenue
73.13
16.98
0.009.89
Land Use Pattern
Cultivable Pasture Forest Revenue
The total sanction area available for treatment is 6207 ha of ten villages in six gram panchayat.
Land use pattern in terms of ownership of the ALOLI watershed project gives an impression that
73.13% of the total area is own by farmers i.e private land, 17% of total area own by gram
panchyats i.e pasture land and 9.9 % of the total loand own by revenue department.
The data also reveal the fact that maximum
area covered under private land which may
be categorise into 58.6 % cultivable land
use by farmer for agriculture and 14.5 %
cultivable waste land which is presently
fallow or use by farmer for fodder purpose
only. PIA will pay special focus to develop
the waste cultivable land into productive
purpose to enhance the income of the
farmer.
Forest land is zero in the project area,
pasture land is 17% which is a major part
but fodder production is very low as
compare to area. This land is also
encroached by farmers in few villages
The data of the project area also gives the
impression that PIA has to do more
efforts for treatment of arable land
because it covers almost ¾ area of the
total project area. Treatment of the
degraded land is the priority under ownership of gram panchyat and revenue.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
42, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-31 Land Use and Land Cover Pattern
S.No Title Area (Ha )
1 Agriculture Land without crop 132.70
2 Agriculture land with Kharif crop 1470.58
3 Agriculture land with Kharif and Rabi crop 2640.27
4 River 200.90
5 Land without scrub 1262.73
6 Land with scrub 453.33
7 Mining /Industrial waste 5.59
8 Scattered vegetation 46.93
9 Settlement 32.13
10 Water body 273.53
11 Gully/raveneous 12.43
19.8
53
27.2
Irrigated Non irrigated others
Irrigation status
Table-32 Contour interval
Contour Interval HL LL
Major contour 5 m 359 327
Minor contour 1 m 359 327
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
43, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.4 Topography -The area is composed of comparatively flat tracts (more than 84% area under 1
% slope) of low difference between ridges and valleys. The hills are very less (less than 1%) in
project area and it is not surrounded by hills and no hillock found in the project area so drainage
area is very less.
If we talk about slope, table mentioned
below give the clear impression about the
area. The slope map enclosed in chapter -8
reveal about the contour pattern of the
project area and slope of the project area.
The slope and contour map developed by
the PDCORE agency for the project area
and important features of the map presented here
Table-34 Detail of drainage pattern of project area
Stream order Length(Meter) Area(Ha )
First order 28518.11 1.22
Second order 10037.2 2.56
Third order 1412.72 6.01
Fourth order NIL NIL
84.05
13.512.03 0.34 0.08
Slope analysis of project area
0-1% 1-3% 3-5% 5-10% More than 10 %
Table-33 Slope pattern of project area
Slope range Area (ha) Percentage
0-1% 5323.2 84.05
1-3% 855.4 13.51
3-5% 128.4 2.03
5-10% 21.72 0.34
More than 10 % 4.93 0.08
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
44, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.5 Soil – The predominant Soil of the project area is classified mainly into color of yellow, light
brown. It is mainly type of clay and clay loamy, few area also have sandy loam with kankar.
These soil having poor moisture retention capacity.
WDT team carried out the transect walk under PRA
exercise in the project village to identify the soil
type, soil health and understand the soil texture and
structure. The types of soil are vary village to
village to in the project area.
The table given shows the soil health status of the
project villages which reveal about micro nutrient
status of the soil health. The map of the kekri block
is also given below to show the soil health status of
the project area.
Table- 35 Soil analysis of project area
Village N2 P2O K2O
Sadara L M M
Sadari M M M
ALOLI L H M
Balapura M M M
Nayagaon M M M
Mehrukalan M M M
Gothra L M M
Deopura M M H
Amli M M H
Mehrukhurd M M M
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
45, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Note- L –Low, M-Medium, H-High
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
46, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.6 Literacy - Literacy is one of the main factors for the overall development of the area. Only
literacy can provide valuable and knowledgeable based working force that is one of the four
inevitable instruments for the development. Ajmer district have a good position in terms of
literacy but position of Kekri block is slightly poor as compare to average rate of Ajmer district
and project area literacy rate is also at lower side.
Table-36 Literacy Rate of Project area
Literacy Rate Male Female
Rajasthan 67.5 % 80.5% 52.70%
Ajmer 70.46 % 83.93 % 56.42 %
Kekri 67.53 77.48 55.39
2.7 Erosion Status- Project area is affected by only water erosion. Majority of area is flat so intensity of erosion is not so much high but it is significant due to barren land and land use practice.
Table-37 Detail of Soil Erosion
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)
Water erosion
a Sheet 4030
b Rill 1545
c Gully 632
Sub-Total
Wind erosion
Total 6207 ha
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
47, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.8 Land Holding
Land classification on the basis of land holding is very interesting in the project areas. Table
shows the village wise data of each project village about types of farmers and their respective
land holding. Analysis of the data of project villages reveals the fact that approximately 45.8 %
of farmer comes under marginal farmer category followed bysmall farmers 27.8 %, 23.5 % of
medium farmers and 1 % of big farmers in project area. The total population of small and
marginal farmers is 72 % of total households which is a huge part. In nutshell, the total families
of small and marginal farmers (SMF) are approximately 72% and their land holding is just 39 %
of the project area. Average land holding of the project area is 1.35 ha land. The data available
with the PIA also shows that approximately 85 % of the SC/ST category farmers belong to small
and marginal farmer category.
Table- 38 Detail of land holdings
S.No
Name of village
Total families
Marginal Small Medium Big Land less
No. Area No. Area No. Area No.
Area No
1 Sadara 605 276 163.02 172 254.28 152 559.6 5 79.56 0
2 Sadari 281 92 45.7 90 110.84 84 244.15 3 10.71 12
3 ALOLI 551 300 137.05 112 125.11 124 380.04 6 18.2 9
4 Balapura 160 55 37.3 37 56.33 58 253.04 2 11.62 8
5 Nayagaon 214 69 40.57 72 105.96 56 203.93 2 14.19 15
6 Mehrukalan 845 375 215.03 272 392.1 179 651.13 15 233.2 4
7 Gothra 124 53 24.14 28 39.07 41 146 2 26.18 0
8 Deopura 185 112 57.05 51 74.26 18 72.67 0 4
9 Amli 357 183 74.26 94 130.1 77 274.65 0 3
10 Mehrukhurd 177 90 43.95 51 77.43 36 109 0 0
Total 3499 1605 838.07 979 1365.4 825 2894.21 35 393.7 0
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
48, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.9 Agriculture - Agriculture is the prime occupation of livelihoods of the more than 80% of
population of project area. Discussion with farmers gives an impression that agriculture
production area is fluctuating and depends on the rains of the particular year. If we trust on the
community discussion, crops production was very less due to continuous droughts upnto year
2007. A large part of the village population is composed of small and marginal farmers with
subsistence agriculture, mainly for self sufficiency. The special feature of the project area is the
major area covered under cultivation under crops occupied by food grains and pulses. The
agriculture is alternated between two seasons of Kharif and Rabi. The major crops under Khraif
are Jowar, Bajra, Moong, Cotton and Maize which are in addition to hardy and less water
demanding. Wheat is the major crop of the project area and in addition to Gram, Mustard
Tarameera and Barley is the other crops cultivating in the project area.
Crop rotation of the project area is
Bajra - Wheat/Mustard
Bajra - Fallow
Moong- Mustard
Moong- Fallow
45.8
27.923.5
1
15.25
24.8
52.7
7.2
Marginal Small Medium Big
Analysis of Land category v/s Land Holding
Population (%) Land (%)
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
49, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Focus group discussion (FGD) exercise was carried out with farmers to know about the area
sown under Kharif crops. The data of PRA shows that maximum area covered under Jowar and
Bajra, followed by Moong, Urad Cotton and Maize.
In the project area farmers of Sadara, Sadri and Mehrukalan also attracted towards cash crop of
Cotton, the project area increased up to 15% in project villages. Similarly farmers of Sadara
Sadri and Mehrulakan also attracted towards Castor crop , this crop was cultivated in a
significant area, production is very good but unfortunately rate were down and farmers also face
problem of market for this crop.
15%
38%15%
10%
6%16%
Sowing Pattern of Kharif Crops -Kadera, Alloli, Gothara
Bajra Jowar Moong
Urad Maize Others
10%
30%
5%5%
4%
36%
10%
Sowing Pattern- Kharif
Bajra Jowar Moong Urad
Maize Cotton Others
8%
31%
8%
4%4%
15%
15%
15%
Sowing Pattern-Kharif in Sadara & Mehrukalan
Bajra Jowar Moong Urad Maize Cotton Castor Others
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
50, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Moong and Urad are the other crops cultivating in approximately 10-15% of the net sown area.
ALOLI and Deopura villages cover maximum area of urad and moong crop. Chilly was the key
crop of the Kadera gram panchyat area but its area is contniously decreasing from last eight to
ten years due to erratic and less rains
View of Castor crop
It was very difficult to get the area sown
under Rabi through PRA because community
informed that it is purely depend on the
availability of rains in the monsoon, time of
rains and availability of rains in winter
(Maawat). They reported that wheat area
increase if project area gets good rains and
also in winter (Maawat) but area under
Mustard and Gram increases if inadequate
rains find in project area. In season of more
than average rainfall, wheat is the first
choice of farmer otherwise they prefer to go with Mustard and Gram. They prefer wheat because
of good rate in market of wheat, self consumption and fulfillment of requirement of fodder. The
figure given below reveal the impression about sowing pattern of project area under rabi crops
20%
40%
30%
10%
Sowing Pattern Rabi- Low rains
Wheat Mustard Gram Other
35
30
25
20
Sowing Pattern Rab--Good rains
Wheat Mustard Gram Other
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
51, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 39 Detail of Cropping pattern of project area
Name of crop Main variety Yield (QT/Ha
KHARIF Crops
Jowar CSV-15 14
Bajra MH-179 HHB-67, Hyrid 14
Til TC-25 TC-46 7.5
Moong K-851 7.5
RABI crops
Wheat RAJ-3077, Raj-3777, LOKONE
25
Barley RD-2035 27
Gram C-235, RSG-888 23
Tarameera T-1 4
Mustard RGH-48, PUSA BOLD 4.5
Table- 40 Fertiliser Pattern Name of crops
Pesticides (Lt) Fertilizer(Kg/Ha)
Urea DAP Super phosphate
FYM(Ton /Ha)
Jowar Chloropyrophas 30 60
Bajra Chloropyrophas 30 60 20 ton /Ha
Maize 50
Til Thyram 5gm/ kg seed 30
Gram Rizobium Culture 60
Wheat FIR,Chloropyrophos 50 60 20 ton / Ha
Barlru Culture 50 60
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
52, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 41 Village wise cropped area
S.No Name of Villages Gross cropped area Double cropped area
Net sown area
1 Sadara 573 156 417
2 Sadari 487 203 284
3 ALOLI 562 159 403
4 Balapura 590 145 445
5 Nayagaon 445 109 336
6 Mehrukalan 1765 426 1339
7 Gothra 336 101 235
8 Deopura 84 20 64
9 Amli 60 14 46
10 Mehrukhurd 91 22 69
Total 4993 1355 3638
The data given in the table above shows the cropping intensity 137% in particular year however
it got down to 110 % in the years of low rainfall and increased up to maximum 140% in last one
decade.
PIA gathered the field idea about seed replacement rate of the project area. It is approximately
15% in wheat, 8% in Gram, 80-90% in Bajra, 80% in Mustard, 15 % in Maize and 20% in
Moong crops. Majority of farmers go with hybrid seeds in castor crop and Bajra
Soaf and Jeera are the other important spice crops cultivating in the project area. Soaf area
increased in case of good rains. Approximately 6-8% of the total area of Rabi covere under both
crops.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
53, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.10 Inputs in agriculture
Seed, fertilizer and pesticides are the major production component responsible for the
productivity of any crop variety due to its inherent potential. WDT conducted PRA in the project
villages to find out the current status about input in agriculture. The key points of the FGD are
strongly demand to make necessary arrangement for smoothly and timely availability of inputs to
farmers at low cost.
Farmer are purchasing inputs from the near by market at Mehrukalan from the private supplier.
Three GSS is available in the project area at gram panchyat head quarter but not capable to fulfill
the requirement of all at peak time. It looks that project area farmers are more depend on private
suppliers for purchase of agriculture input and sell of fertiliser.
Looking to the scenario of seed replacement rate (SRR) for various crops in the project area,
which is more in bajra crop followed by cotton, wheat, gram, maize etc . There is scope for
increasing the SRR in all crops to provide the basket of varieties to widen the choice for farmers
to select the varieties suited to their requirement. The other aspect of seed management is the
Table -42 Productivity of main crops
S.No. Name of crop Area Yield(kg/ha)
1 Maize 337.00 1368 kg
2 Bajra 540.00 1510 kg
3 Jawar 2100.00 665 kg
4 Moong 1430.00 575 kg
5 Urid 210.00 575 kg
6 Til 445.00 300 kg
7 Wheat 740.00 2400 kg
8 Barley 315.00 2000 kg
9 Gram 570.00 690 kg
10 Mustared 1345.00 875 kg
11 Zera(Spice) 190.00 345 kg
12 Cotton 2800.00 2200 kg
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
54, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
timely availability of the seed to the growers so that they sow the crop in time with suitable
variety/hybrid rather than using the local seed material. Similarly, the quality of the seed
available with the traders is monitored regularly to avoid the possibility of the poor quality seed.
Farmer’s knowledge is reasonably fair on available hybrid seeds. He purchases the seeds from
the market which is provided by the local supplier. They are exploited by the local suppliers in
terms of rate and quality of seed. Farmers are not happy with the services of availability of seed
and fertilizer at time with the cooperatives. The stock available with the cooperatives and GSS is
very less as compare to demand of the area.
2.11 Farm Mechanization
The agriculture equipment industry is a key sector that contributes to agriculture growth and
productivity. Mechanized farming is modern scientific methods of cultivation. It improves
productivity and production of farm land and reduces cost of cultivation as also human drudgery
by facilitating efficient handling of agriculture operations. The status of project area in farm
mechanization is not very encouraging. Only big Farmers of project area have their own tractors
(71), seed drill and threshers in the project area. Majority of farmer’s specially small, marginal
and medium farmers around 80-85 % do not have their own farm equipments so they hire the
tractor with farm equipments whenever they require from the nearby areas or if available in the
same village. Farmers are attracting towards tractor drawn seed and fertilizer drill, thresher cum
harvester etc. It was analyzed that farmers spent approximately 12000-20000 on hire the farm
equipments for one ha of land in whole process
It looks that input cost of farmer is increase due to investment on purchasing farm equipments
and it could be reduce if farmers group manage the farm equipment at rotation basis so it is
proposed to provide the farm equipmens to the group of farmers.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
55, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 43 Farm mechanization status
S.No Name of Villages Tractor Thresher Seeddrill Sprayer Cultivator
1 Sadara 12 4 12 12 10
2 Sadari 6 2 5 4 6
3 ALOLI 17 6 17 17 16
4 Balapura 3 1 3 3 3
5 Nayagaon 4 2 4 4 4
6 Mehrukalan 15 5 15 15 15
7 Gothra 4 1 4 3 3
8 Deopura 3 1 3 3 3
9 Amli, Mehrulhurd 7 2 7 6 7
Total 71 24 70 67 67
2.12 Livestock- Rajasthan state is at first position in number of animals and has the biggest share
of the animals 20% in the country. Livestock in Ajmer district occupies a prominent position
contributing significantly to the livelihood, mitigation of risks and distress of the farmers. In
Rajasthan where drought is a common phenomenon, livestock sector has been able to provide a
good coping mechanism and reduced vulnerability in the region which has been experiencing
drought like situation consecutively every two to three years
WDT team carried out the PRA in the project area to analysis the livestock position in the project
area. The few significant features found during the discussion are:-
23.3% of the total population of livestock belong to cow, followed by 15.54% buffalo,
31.50% goat, 24.57% sheep and 4.97% other animals. The data shows the project area
has 55 % of small ruminant of total animals and community attraction towards small
ruminates specially goat.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
56, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Progressive community of ALOLI watershed prefers Buffalo and remaining community
in favor of Cow in the project area. The reason behind the cow rearing is low demand of
fodder as compare to buffalo and buffalo has good percentage of fat which provide good
value of milk.
Large part of community members has desi breed cow and buffalo. Gir is the good
quality breed easily available and most preferred breed in the project area.
Parameters Desi Gir Cross Breed like HF/Jersy
Availability of fodder 4 3 1
Productivity 2 4 5
Immunity power 4 5 1
Fat percentage 2 4 2
Facilities available 4 3 1
The above table shows the ranking given by community on few certain aspects among basket of choice available. It
Clearly indicates that community prefer Gir in cow and Murrah in Buffalo
They preferred it due to high productivity, good looking and its capacity to adaptation to the
climate of the project area, resale value, high percentage of fat in milk which gives good value of
money and easily availablity in the nearby area.
Community prefer to adopt natural insemmination technique for breed improvement rather than
artificial insemmination however results of previous experiences for breed improvement done
by other agencies are not very encouraging. It was mainly due to lack of proper institution in the
area.
Commonly the small animals Goat and Sheep are reared by the poor and marginal farmers while
the large animals Cattle, Buffaloes etc. by the comparatively better ups. The farmers are
maintaining their livestock for drought purpose and getting negligible milk & meat products
from it. They are lacking in management, feeding, breeding and disease control measures. As a
result there is poor growth, non-descript offspring and huge mortality of animals/ birds due to
our breaks.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
57, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-44 Livestock detail Of Project Area
Name of villages Cow Buffalo Goat Sheep Others Total
Desi High breed
Desi High breed
Sadara 617 06 458 0 994 627 109 2811
Sadari 172 07 278 0 370 363 60 1250
ALOLI 850 06 472 0 613 414 115 2470
Balapura 215 15 108 0 318 225 40 921
Nayagaon 163 7 85 0 210 280 45 790
Mehrukalan 610 10 402 0 512 425 147 2106
Gothra 123 17 65 0 310 230 40 785
Deopura 100 10 70 0 290 280 46 796
Amli 80 10 65 0 275 235 35 700
Mehrukhurd 100 8 78 0 325 210 28 759
23.35
15.54
31.50
24.57
4.97
Livestock analysis of project area
Cow Buffalo Goat Sheep Others
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
58, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 45 Productivity of Cattle in project area
S.No Livestock Purpose Productivity (Year)
1 Cow –Deshi Milk , Bull 1.5-2 Lt
2 Cow-High breed Milk 8-10 Lt
3 Buffalo- Deshi Milk 4-5 Lt
4 Buffalo-High breed Milk 8-12 Lt
5 Goat Milk , Meat 0.5-1 Kg
6 Sheep Wool 1-1.5 Kg
At present many institutions like Saras, Ajmer dairy, Reliance, Kisan and Rajpurohit are the
main working in project area and collect the milk through their mobile vans. At present no BMC
is available at any dairy in the project area. Farmers sell more than 70-80 % of their production
to the dairy and earn the additional income. It is approximately 8000-10000 liter per day for
project area all around the year. There is vast untapped potential for enhance the livelihoods of
project communities through dairy.
The proposed activities for improve the productivity of the animal in livestock sector are
Breed improvement
Health camps
Demonstration of improve practices
Basic health facilities
Quality forage production
2.13 Fodder status
PIA organized focus group discussion in the project area to assess the fodder status in the village
because the secondary data was not available at village level to get know the idea of fodder. The
existing cultivable land for fodder is very less (less than 10%) in the project area and encroached
by dominat community. It is not significantly contributed for the milch animal however use for
small ruminates and unproductive cattles. It is not adequate to fulfill the demand of the
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
59, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
communities. Majority of family cultiv ating Jowar crop and also grow green fodder “Rijka “at
their field and use crops residue for the fodder. Green fodder is available only in months of
august to October in the pasture land otherwise dry fodder is available on common land. It was
revealed in the discussion that fodder status is depending on the monsoon. If rains are good then
project community have no problem regarding fodder and it is at surplus stage but in drought or
in condition of less rains , fodder availability is less and community face the problem.
Community demands the fodder from M.P, Kota and Bundi. In last ten years community faced
three- foure time’s problems for fodder availability during less years of rainfall.
Average rainfall full fill the demand, no need to importGood rainfall surplus fodder Drought deficit(30-40%) , purchase from outside
2.14 Drinking water status
The project area is quite unfortunate in terms of drinking water because Bisalpur drinking water
project which solve the drinking water problem of the a large part of Rajasthan but did not solve
the problem of local community . The main source of drinking water in the project area is public
supply point of the Bisalpur pipe line but water supply is available at interval of 72 to 96 hours
and still hamlets are not in reach of the PSP.
60%
32%
8%
Source of Fodder supply
Jowar Crop residue Green fodder
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
60, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Open well is the important key and reliable source of drinking water for sweet water. Hand
pump is also important source of water but majority of handpump supply fluoride water and
tasteless water so community prefer
open well for drinking water.
During PRA, it was discussed that safe,
potable and assured drinking water in
all season is the biggest problem of the
project area. water become unsafe and
non hygienic after a certain depth in
such stages when water table is
gradually down so in season of summer, availability of drinking water is a big question for the
PIA.
Table- 46 Source available for Drinking water
Name of village Bore well Community well (Govt)
Hand pump Private Open well
Nadi/Pond
Sadara 5 2 9 23 2 Pond
Sadari 3 1 3 13 3 Nadi
ALOLI 1 6 12 20 3 Nadi3 Pond
Balapura 2 1 6 7 1 Nadi
Nayagaon 1 1 4 5 1 Nadi
Mehrukalan - 7 23 187 1 Pond River Khari
Gothra - - 24 32 1 Pond
Deopura - 2 6 52 1 Pond Khari River
Amli - - 7 23 1 Nadi
Mehrukhurd - 1 6 17 1 Nadi Khari River
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
61, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.15 Irrigation water sources - Ponds are the main sources of irrigation in the project area.
Mehrukalan gram panchyat is little fortunate compare to other gram panchyat. There are few
ponds available in the Mehrukalan gram panchyat and one anicut in the Khari rive. However
anicut has silted and commumity want to desilt it to increase the water storage capacity.
Well is first and prime important source of irrigation. The water table in the well is 20-25 meter.
The available irrigation sources are able to provide the ensure irrigation facility to 20 % of the
cultivable land however area is reach up to 25-30 % in good rains. The table given below gives
an impression about the available sources of irrigation.
Second important source is Anicut and Ponds also contributed to provide the facility of a small
part of the area. It is 5-8 % of the area. In project area irrigation through canal is also negligible.
In NREGA, many old structures proposed for renovation in the project area which certainly
enhance the irrigated area
2.16 Natural Calamities in project area – WDT members organized the PRA in the village and
discuss about the natural calamities in last ten years and its impact on the project villages in
Table –47 Available water bodies in project area
Project village Anicut Small water bodies
Nadi Big Pond
Sadara 3 2 3 1
Sadari - - 1 -
ALOLI 3 3 3
Balapura 4 - 1 1
Nayagaon 2 2 1 -
Mehrukalan 6 5 5 1
Gothra 2 - -
Deopura 2 - -
Amli 1 - 2 -
Mehrukhurd 2 - 1 -
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
62, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
terms of drinking water availability, livestock and agriculture. Data of last ten years data were
also collected to cross check the villager’s perception, analysis of data reveals the fact that 3
droughts have been faced by the project area i.e frequency of drought is once in thrice years. It
was informed by the community that changes in climatic condition have changed the frequency
of droughts in last decade. Climatic changes have increased frequency of extreme weather events
during past 15 years and raised the vulnerability and risk. There are several manifestations of
drought like late arrival of rains, early withdrawal, long break in between, lack of sufficient
water in reservoirs and drying up of wells leading to crop failure and even un-sowing of the
crops which ultimately curtail livelihood and may lead to migration.
Table – 48 Detail of natural calamities in last ten year
Year Status % of agriculture affected
% of livestock affected
% of household affected
Remarks
2002 Severe 30 45 50 Low rainfall, few rainy days with high intensity, acute drinking water problem
2004 Mild 40 40 50 Erratic and uncertain rainfall, drinking water problem, no source of irrigation in rabi crops
2009 Severe 80 80 85 Acute shortage of drinking water, irrigation source, fodder etc
2.17 Water Productivity
Water productivity is the key focus area in the common guidelines. At now, community is not
aware about the importance of drip and sprinkler irrigation system. They have a misconception
that micro irrigation especially drip irrigation is not suitable for project area the table given
below gives us an idea about the existing micro irrigation system. In current scenario, only 126
farmers have micro irrigation system however this number become more reduce if we talk about
adoptuion of this technology in field. In such condition use of micro irrigation technology help to
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
63, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
increase the more area under irrigation with same amount of water so there is need to motivate
the farmers towards micro irrigation.
It was revealed during discussion with agriculture and horticulture department officers that now
farmers are attract towards drip irrigation due to area increased under cotton crop. There is a lot
of untapped poteintial towards drip irrigation with horticulture orchard also.
Pond is the main source of irrigation in project area and water use efficiency is very low in
project area due to flood irrigation practices, water conveyance through kutcha water distribution
channel etc so there is a lot of scope for improves the water productivity with farmer friendly
technology.
2.18 Horticulture and Vegetables
Farmers in project area are mainly involved in traditional agriculture practices and believe in
food grain and pulses. They are hesitating to move towards crop diversification. In project area
communities mainly prefer citrus, papaya, ber, aonla and gonda for fruit cultivation. There is
Table-49 Detail of Micro Irrigation system in Project area
Name of villages No of drip No of sprinkler
Sadara 3 45
Sadari 2 5
ALOLI - 18
Balapura - 4
Nayagaon - 5
Mehrukalan - 10
Gothra 1 8
Deopura - -
Amli 3 10
Mehrukhurd - 2
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
64, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
better scope for mobilize the resources of NHM in the project area. The project area is highly
suitable in term of ecology for cultivation of fruits and vegetable cultivation.
The table presented here shows the impression that only 7 farmers of project area took initiate for
fruit cultivation and few progressive farmers are cultivating vegetable. In this project, PIA
developed the strategy to cover the area under crop diversification at large scale.
2.19 Common Property Resources - The project area has a good quantity (16%) of common
land which is either waste or cultivable but not use for cultivation now. The majority of people of
project area depend on the common property resources for their livelihood. Most of them
continue to live a virtually hand-to-mouth existence. The traditional pasture lands have been
rapidly depleting due to over-grazing and persistent drought-like conditions in the region .
Community is depending on these resources for their individual needs like fuel wood for cooking
Table- 50 Detail of project area on crop diversification Name of Villages No of farmers
for Fruit cultivation
Vegetable cultivation
No of farmers
Area
Sadara 3 50 12
Sadari 2 35 6
ALOLI 0 4 1
Balapura 0 1 0.50
Nayagaon 0 1 0.60
Mehrukalan 2 10 3
Gothra 0 1 0.25
Deopura 0 1 0.30
Amli 0 1 0.35
Mehrukhurd 0 2 0.50
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
65, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
and fodder for livestock and grazing of animals specially small ruminates. Common land in the
project area has many water bodies help to maintain the water table in the project villages.
Presently common pasture land has no use and degraded gradually. Village community uses this
land for only open grazing.
It is unfortunate that village community encroached a big part of the common land and few
dominated peoples do not want to free such land in favor of development of village. However
project community of few project villages the common land and encroachment.. Desi Babool,
Neem, Khejri, Ber are the most preferred plant by the community.
It is proposed to develop pasture land by agro forestry and grass land management because in
current scenario of climate change, this work help to improve soil fertility, reduce soil erosion,
reduce emission of GHG. In duration of two to three
years, huge production of grass would help the
problem of fodder in droughts and improve the milk
productivity due to nutritious feed management.
2.20 NREGA status – NREGA is the biggest
government scheme for rural development in the rural
development. Project area Gram Panchayat performs
significant progress in this scheme. They achieved the
target of registration of the needy family for work and
issued the job card. The detail of job card is given
below in the table. PIA is also the implementing
NREGA in the Kekri block and paying focus on
execution of many works could not cover under
watershed project.
Table- 51 Job card detail of project area S.No Name of
village Total no of job cards
1 Sadara 860
2 Sadari 404
3 ALOLI 799
4 Balapura 221
5 Nayagaon 343
6 Mehrukalan 1073
7 Gothra 273
8 Deopura 175
9 Amli 563
10 Mehrukhurd 206
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
66, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.21 Migration
Migration is the key problem of the project area. During discussion it was found that no work in
field in lean perio is the major reason for migration. Many families migrate to Kekri Jaipur,
Delhi and Ajmer in search of employment. They work there for
two to three months and come occasionally at home. Mines at
Sawar are also the key station for the local communities.
Migrated families involve mainly in construction work. In last
ten years, there were frequent mild and severe droughts
occurred in the project area so project communities depend on
agriculture mainly have no alternate source for livelihood in the
villages other than wages so one or two member from the
families migrate to the another place in search of employment .
NREGA helped the farmers to check the migration up to some
extent. It also help to increase the wages, now they get 250-300
for labor work and 400-450 for mason work in the near by
areas. Familes those work in near by farm house also get goo
wages in peak season.
2.22 Existing institutions – Promotion of existing institutions
is envisaged in the common guidelines so special efforts have been made to identify the existing
institution in the project area and pay special emphasis to strengthen the existing institutions so
that they can contribute for smooth execution of watershed project.
At now, two cooperatives are functioning in the project area but not able to fulfill the demand of
the project area for seed and fertilizer. 26 SHGs were formed by the ICDS but not functioning
now. Besides this many informal groups like youth club formed in the village, which are active
only at time of during festivals or for religious occasions. PIA would paying special attention to
strengthen the capacity and functioning of the institution and form into new group if feel
necessary.
Table-52 Status of Migration in project area
Name of Village
No of families
Sadara 56
Sadari 22
ALOLI 47
Balapura 10
Nayagaon 22
Mehrukalan 76
Gothra 10
Deopura 10
Amli 33
Mehrukhurd 12
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
67, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table- 53 Detail of existing institutions S.No Name of village SHGs Cooperative Dairy
cooperative 1 Sadara 9 1
2 Sadari 3 1
3 ALOLI 3 1 1
4 Balapura 2 1
5 Nayagaon 1 1
6 Mehrukalan 2 1 1
7 Gothra 2
8 Deopura 1
9 Amli/Mehrakhurd 2
2.23 Support and Extension facilities –Agriculture and livestock are the prime occupation of
the project area but the support and extension services are not very encouraging. Infrastructure
support in the project area is very poor. Farmers are fully dependent on the private local
suppliers for purchasing of input, services, sell of produces and vale addition available at
Mehrukalan and Kadera which is 3 to 4 km from the project area.. It reveals that facilities
available are comparataively better but not very supportive. They are also seeking for an outlet
centre equipped with facility of good quality of seed, fertilizer and pesticides available at time at
reasonable cost. Agriculture extension offices and veternery hospitals are available in the project
area but services are not adequate and available at time when needs to the community.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
68, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table-54 Facilities available in project area
S.No Infrastructure Facility Place Distance
1 Agriculture Mandi Kekri 15
2 Agriculture input shop (private) Mehrukalan 2-6 Km
3 Agriculture Cooperative Mehrukalan 2
4 Local suppliers for purchase agriculture produce Mehrukalan 2
5 Seed supplier Mehrukalan 2
6 Pesticides , fertilizer supplier Mehrukalan 2
7 Storage facility Kekri 15
8 Cold storage Kekri 15
9 Nearest town Kekri 15
10 Nearest local market Kekri 15
11 Farm tool and equipment shop Kekri 15
12 Veterinary hospitals Mehrukalan 2-6
13 A.I facility Mehrukalan 2-6
14 Nearest local market for purchase of cattle Kekri
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
69, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2.24 Water Budgeting - Water budgeting help us to understand the current position of available water, water requirement and deficit and surplus status of water. In present scenario in project area, all project villages are water deficit. This is because demand of water requirement of all project villages is more than the water available in the village.
WATER BUDGETING OF THE ALOLI WATERSHED
Total geographical area of Watershed 6207 Ha
Effective Area 6207 Ha
Rainfall of the Watershed area 550 mm
Proportion of estimated runoff to rainfall for 550 mm
Total mansoon rainfall
(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfallIn Good Catchment :- 17.30%In Average Catchment :- 12.90%
Area of watershedIn Good Catchment = x = 4539 Ha In Average Catchment = y = 1668 Ha In Bad Catchment = z = 0 Ha
Total Runoff available In Good catchment 4318858 cumIn Average catchment 1183446 cumIn Poor Catchment 0 cum
Total runoff available 5502304 cum
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
70, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Present storage of the existing water bodies
S.No Water bodies No Storage capacity
1 Big Talab 3 300002 Anicut 4 140003 Nadi 17 170004 Small water bodies 26 13000
Total storage capacity of existing water bodies = 74000 cum
Following structures are proposed for retain the runoff in the project area
S.No Activity No Storage capacity (Cum)
1 MMS 38 114000
2 Khadin 168 168000
3 NADI 14 9800
4 Anicut 3 10500
5 Others 06 Total 302300
Total runoff trapped in existing & proposed structures=376300
% runoff trapped =6.83%
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
71, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER-3
Proposed Development Plan of ALOLI watershed project
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
72, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter-3
PLANNING OF ALOLI WATERSHED PROJECT
This chapter deals with the planning of ALOLI watershed project. As per envisaged in the
common guidelines, the ALOLI watershed project is classified into the three project phases. In
view of the expanded scope and expectations under the watershed development program, the
project duration could be in the range of four to seven years depending upon the activities of the
watershed project. In ALOLI watershed project, it is designed for maximum six years. However
implementation period is vary gram panchyat to gram panchyat , it is proposed for two years for
three gram panchyats have limited funds to save the administration cost of the project,
implementation period is proposed for maximum 3 ¼ years for mehrukalan gram panchyat.
Consolidation phase is for 9 months which is equal for all gram panchyats
3.1 Project Period- Six Years (2010-11 to 2015-16)
Phases Duration
Preparatory phase 2 Year
Works Phase 3 Years and Three months
Consolidation and Withdrawal phase 9 Months
Table-56 Proposed period of Gram panchyats
Gram Panchyat Prepratory Phase
Implemntation Phase Consolidation
Years 1 2 3 4 5 5 1/4 6 Years MehruKalan ALOLIGordhaSadaraKaderaPiplaj
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
73, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3.2 Capacity Building
PIA would provide key focus on the capacity building of various stakeholders in whole phase of
the watershed project to build their conceptual, managerial, analytical, technical and operational
capabilities. PIA believes that Capacity building is the key mechanism to introduce participatory
approaches for planning, implementation and management of watershed activities. A series of
training program would be organized for various stakeholders according to changing perspective.
Special focus would be provided on follow up of each training program to measure the
effectiveness and change in degree of organizational and attitudinal change.
Table -57 CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN
S.N STAKEHOLDERS
Total No Participants covered
No of Days
No of Trainings
Rate Amount
1 PRIs
District level 30 20 1 1 450 9000
Block Level 27 40 1 1 300 12000
GP level 45 220 1 6 150 198000
2 WDT 4 4 2 3 500 12000
4 4 3 2 500 12000
4 4 1 6 150 3600
3 SHGs 380 300 1 6 150 270000
300 2 3 250 450000
300 3 2 300 540000
4 UG 200 200 1 5 150 150000
5 Farmers 405 780 1 1 150 117000
6 WC members 60 1 5 150 45000
60 2 2 300 72000
60 3 1 300 54000
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
74, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
7 Exposure
Combined common exposure 365000
SHGs 55000
UG 42000
WC 40000
8 Slogan writing, Display writing 115000
9 IEC 102000
10 Capacity building of the Individuals 55000
Grand Total 2718600
Fund Management
Manage by PIA 2718600Manage by DWDC 968000Manage by SLNA 37240Grand Total 3723840
Rs Thirty Seven Lakhs twenty three thousands eight hundred fourty only
The proposed training program would be organized for one day, two day and for three day only
in field of agriculture, livestock , soil & water conservation, institutional development (SHGs
and UGs related subject), ITK , record keeping etc . PIA has also identified resource institutions
and constituted a panel for this particular project. The pedagogy of the training program would
be used as per suitable to target group. Special training programs in field will arrange for farmer
and volunteers in the project area.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
75, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CapacityBuilding
Orientation Program
Field Training
Technical Training
Exposure Advance training
Sangosthi
Subject specfic training
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
76, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
77, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Table -58 PANEL OF RESOURCE INSTITUTIONS
S.NO Name of Institution Address Area of Expertise
1 Krishi Vighyan Kendra, Ajmer Ajmer Agriculture Technology and Management
2 Central Spice Tabiji Pulses
3 Agriculture Research station Tabiji Agriculture Technology and Management
4 Panchyat Training Center Ajmer grass root level training
5 Deputy Director, Veterniry department Ajmer Livestock Management , Dairy
6 ARAVALI-NGO Ajmer Livelihoods
7 Agriculture Department Agriculture Technology and Management
8 State Institute of Agriculture Management Jaipur Agriculture Technology and Management
9 M.R. Morarka-NGO Ajmer SHG/UG
10 Mayajan -NGO Dausa Institutional development
11 BAIF Ajmer Livestock Management
12 CTAE Udaipur Soil and Water conservation
13 CAZRI Jodhpur Agriculture Technology and Management
3.3 Entry Point Activity (EPA) - after establish a reasonably enabling environment; EPA was
taken by the PIA. The key purpose of EPA is to establish credibility of the WDT and establish a
rapport with the village community. It also helps in developing the enabling environment in the
project area and to assess the community strengths. EPA also give us the opportunity to test the
community on check on non negotiable.
PIA has organized many meetings in a series at regular interval in the project villages. Senior
officers from Jila Parishad and Panchayat samiti also attended the few meetings. After establish a
rapport building PIA organized gram sabha in each gram Panchayat for constitution of WC and
selection of EPA. Communities identified the works that were most important for whole
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
78, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
community. Till writing of DPR majority of works near to complete, remaining works started
and in process and yet to be started.
Table- 59 Detail of Gram Sabha for EPAs S.No Name of Gram Panchayat Dates of Gram Sabha
1 Aloli 31/5/2011
2 Mehra Kalan 2/6/2011
3 Sadara 2/6/2011
4 Kadera 7/6/2011
5 Goardha 6/7/2011
6 Piplaj 11/6/2011
Table- 60 Detail of EPAs S.No Name of
Villages Name of EPA No of
activities Sanction cost
Status
1 Sadara 1. Community Platform 2. Boundary wall at common
place
2 1.254.99
ongoingcomplete
2 ALOLI1. Vishram Stahali2. Boundary wall of funeral
place
2 2.5 ongoing
3 Balapura Hathai construction 1 0.50 ongoing
4 Mehrukalan 1. Baramada in school2. Platform at funeral place3. To be decided 4. House for domestic waste5. Safety wall at common
place
5 1.954.07.50.81.60
completedongoing -ongoing ongoing
5 Gothra Platform for community 1 1.25 ongoing
6 Deopura Platform for community 1 0.50 ongoing
7 Amli Hathai construction 1 0.60 ongoing
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
79, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
GLIMPSES OF EPA IN PROJECT AREA
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
80, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3.4 Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) -
In the common guidelines, more emphasize is given to ensure community participation at every
stage of the project. Guidelines also provide community participation at the centre of the project
and specially mentioned about to ensure the involvement of the backward community, small and
marginal famers, land less and women in the planning stage.
WDT team carried out the household
survey in the village with involvement of
youth of project villages. The household
format contains the socio –economic data
of the individual family. PRA tools like
resource mapping, transect walk, focus
group discussion (FGD), community
problem analysis (CPA), ranking , semi
structured interview and time line were
used by the WDT members to know about
livelihoods of village, available resources
in the project area, main problems, their
analysis and optimal solution to resolve the
problem.
The WDT members conducted specific
sector wise analysis to analysis the situation in agriculture and animal husbandry sector. PRA
conducted in the village help to develop the SWOC analysis of the key sub sector of watershed
program.
Table-61 Detail of PRAs
S.No Name of Villages Name of PRA
1 Sadara 03.06.2011
2 Sadari 07.06.2011
3 ALOLI 02.06.2011
4 Balapura 06.06.2011
5 Nayagaon 05.06.2011
6 Mehrukalan 04.06.2011
7 Gothra 08.06.2011
8 Deopura 09.06.2011
9 Amli/Mehrakhurd 10.06.2011
10 Sadara 11.06.2011
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
81, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Few Glimpses of PRA in project area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
82, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3.5 Livelihood Analysis- PIA team paid special emphasis on livelihood analysis of the project
area and gather information to understand the all five capitals and its existence status in the
project area. PIA also develops understanding on the vulnerability issues of the project area
especially with reference to agriculture and livestock.
WDT team carried out the PRA in the project area to identify the income sources of livelihoods
of the project communities. The analysis of data reveals that agriculture is the prime source of
income followed by wage in village or outside areas. Approximately more than 70 % of the
population is workforce in the project area. Communities those have rain fed land have engaged
in more than one occupation for their livelihoods. They engage in agriculture for six- seven
months and remaining time wage in agriculture or non farming sector is the key occupation of
such community.
The analysis of FGD conducted with the community gives this impression about the livelihoods
of project area.
Farmers those only depend on
agriculture and animal husbandry for
their livelihoods
Progressive farmers have good land
holding , irrigation facility and high
breed cattle
30-35 %
Farmers those prime occupation is
agriculture but wage is also an important
source in lean period
Farmers those have un irrigated land
and work on other farmers land, with
government schemes, near by area etc
in lean period
45-50%
Community depend only on wage for
livelihoods
halt at place for maximum period or on
daily basis
5-10 %
Migrated to other place comes
occasionally
driver, involve in construction work etc
at other place
hardly
1-2%
Self employment i.e shop, self business
etc
3-4 %
Service with private /government 1%
others 5%
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
83, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
WDT team also conducted a FGD discussion and facilitates the community to give the marking
in the existing status of the livelihood capitals on all the five capitals. Firstly all the livelihood
capitals were described them in detail and then facilitated the process through marking the
process from maximum out of five.
Capital Key attributes Factors
Human Capital Skill, knowledge, ability to labor, awareness
lack of knowledge about modern technology and good practices in integrating farming sector, no indigenous skill found in project area
Social Capital Network, institutions, liaison limited liaison, linkages and networking
Physical Capital Infrastructure, asset with family
assets available with community is reasonably good as compare to rural areas
Financial capital Source of income, indebt ness in project area
majority of farmers belong to small and medium category , have income to fulfill the requirement of the family
Natural capital Land, Water, Forest, CPR, vegetation etc
low water table, degraded land, good quality of land with good soil health, suitable agro climate
5 5 5 5 5
2 1.8 2 21.75
Social Capital Human capital Financial Capital Physical Capital Natural capital
Analysis of Livelihood Capital
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
84, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3.6 Gram Panchayat wise proposed budget
ActivityBudget (Rs in Lakhs )
Total CostALOLI SADARA MEHRUKALAN KADERA PIPLAJ GOTHRA
Admn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Monitoring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00EPA 4.14 6.13 15.72 0.48 2.09 1.23 29.79I & CB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00DPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00WORKS 0.00Natural Resource Management 57.94 85.84 220.09 6.72 29.31 17.25 417.15
Arable Land Development 42.48 67.60 161.66 4.64 22.68 14.54 313.60Non Arable Land Development 11.54 13.21 31.45 1.30 4.58 1.93 64.01Drainage Line Treatment 3.92 5.03 26.98 0.78 2.05 0.78 39.54Productivity Enhancement 10.39 15.34 39.32 1.25 5.24 3.07 74.61
Livelihood Enhancement 9.34 13.75 35.3 1.04 4.7 2.71 66.84Consoldation phase 2.69 3.98 10.22 0.31 1.36 0.80 19.36
3.7 Scientific Planning- special efforts made by the Directorate WD & SC , Jaipur Rajasthan to
use GIS and remote sensing in the watershed planning and monitoring. Directorate, WD & SC
made collaboration with the PDCORE organization for developing six thematic maps for
watershed projects sanctioned under IWMP in the Rajasthan. The images of maps are enclosed
with this report in chapter -8.
PDCORE was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and
LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting
present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under
different ownerships at village level
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
85, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The five maps developed by the remote application centre are
1. Base Map- This map developed on the sale of 1: 15,000 and has information regarding drainage
line, cadastral boundary, micro watershed boundary and settlement.
2. Land Use and Land Cover Map- This map have the information of the present land use and
land cover of the project villages of the ALOLI watershed project.
3. Contour Map- the third map is the contour map at 20 m interval
4. Slope Map
5. L Section
6. Key map of drainage and water bodies
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
86, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER-4
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
87, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter-4
Proposed Development Plan
4.1 Introduction
Watershed work is the important component of the watershed project. 75 % of the total project
cost is allocated for the execution of works. Now, watershed project is looked as holistic approach
for development of village so all component is covered in the watershed project. The proposed
works are classified into three important components as per envisaged in the common guidelines.
1. Soil and Water Conservation works
2. Productivity Enhancement
3. Livelihood Enhancement
4.2 Soil and Water Conservation Works. This is the core component of the IWMP watershed
project. 56 % of the total project cost is allocated for this part. Two types of work are covered
under this component. It can be classified into
1. Physical measures
2. Vegetative and Agronomic measures
In the detail project report of IWMP, This component is again divided into three sub component
i.e
A) Arable land development- The proposed works for treatment of private cultivable land is
covered under arable land treatment. Earthen bund and Khadin are the key example.
B) Non arable land development – the proposed works for treatment of non arable land or common
waste land or non cultivable area is covered under this component. Pasture land development is
the key example.
C) Drainage line treatment- The works proposed in the drainage line (streams) of the project area
is called drainage line treatment. Masonry check dam is the key example
The key purposes of the various measures are
a. To check the erosive velocity of water to reduce the soil erosion in project area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
88, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
b. To conserve the water for more time in the project village to promote the recharge phenomena.
c. To provide the irrigation facility in rabi season and life saving irrigation in Kharif season also
d. To cover area under vegetation, agro forestry and plantation to develop eco friendly
environment
e. To reduce the erosion and conserve insitu moisture in the field
4.3 Arable Land Treatment- Three types of measures have been identified through following
participatory approaches and discussion with community for arable land development.
Earthen Bund- This is the most popular soil conservation structure in the country and it is
practiced at large scale all over India. The other name of earthen bund as CVH. It would lie along
the boundary of the field. Land holding in the project area is very small and it is not possible or
feasible to construct contour bund or graded bund in the field. The earthen bund is divided into
three types on the basis of the slope of the land and size of field. It is suitable for project area
because rainfall is low than 600 mm and soil is favorable. It would help in conserve the water in
the field and maintain insitu moisture of the field. The erosion of the field is reduced. The waste
weir in the field helps to safely disposal of the excess water from the field.
Land records data give us an impression that project communities have land holding from 0.4 ha
to 6 ha. Slope of more than 50 % area is 1% and followed by 1 -3 % range. WDT team also
analysis the rainfall pattern and rainfall intensity of the project area. The design and proposed
cross section is enclosed in the design of the earthen bund.
Type of
Earthen Bund
Specification Unit cost
(per ha in Lakhs)
Area Proposed
(Ha)
Type-I 1 % slope 0.15 560.5
Type-II for more than 2 % slope 0.20 260.5
Type-III more than 1 less than 3%slope 0.22 85
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
89, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Farm Pond – This structure is constructed where topography of the project area does not lend
itself to embankment construction, dugout or excavated pond can be constructed. This is
relatively flat area. Since dugout pond can be constructed to expose a minimum water surface area
in proportion to volume so they are advantageous where evaporation losses are high and water is
scarce. However in context to project area, the farm pond is proposed in the flat land to conserve
the rainwater as much as possible in the field.
Sites proposed for farm pond are the place which is at highest natural depression of the field. If
site is demanding, then diversion ditch would construct to divert the flow of water towards farm
pond. The shape of the farm pond is rectangular and size of the pond depend on the land holding
of the farmer, demand of water of farmer , soil type, rainfall pattern and catchment area for
proposed farm pond. The proposed cost of the farm pond from the project is 32 thousands
maximum for pond. Remaining cost would contribute from the farmer in case of more
investment. Total 13 farm ponds proposed in the action plan.
Khadin – A Khadin is an embankment constructed in the farmer field to retain water in the field.
It is made up from the soil available in the farmer field. The key purpose of the Khadin in this
project is to conserve the water in the project area to increase the water table. The available
moisture in the field also helps to get good crop in the Rabi season also. The Khadin design could
Top width Bottom Width Corner A
Corner C Corner D Corner B
Plan of Dugout Pond
7.50 m
7.5
0
m
15m
15
m
c
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
90, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
vary according to length and height of the structure. In this particular project five type of Khadin
is proposed however it may vary according to field condition
Type Unit cost Total structures
Type-I 0.60 90Type-II 0.90 48Type-III 1.50 23Type-IV 2.0 7
Land Reclamation – This activity is proposed for treatment of such lands which are uncultivable
at present time and can be include under category of cultivable with little bit efforts. Private waste
land would be included in this category. Activities like cover the field with good quality silt
application, gypsum application, leveling, clean the surface from stone etc would be plan however
it would depend finally on demand of the field. Then same field would cover under agro forestry
and horticulture plantation or any other cultivation suitable to field to existing climate. The
maximum investment for reclamation of field for one farmer is 30 thousands. Beneficiary would
motivate for contribution for additional cost. This activity will help to increase the area under
cultivation.
4.4 Non Arable Land Development – The various SWC treatment measures proposed for
development of non arable land of project area are described below
Intergrated Agro Forestry and Pasture Development Model- This activity is planned under
non arable land development and planned for common land of project area. Which is cover under
class V to VIII and not suitable for cultivation. Pasture land is encroached and not ready to free
the land so PIA would deal this issue in future. At this junction it is proposed to develop 8.5 ha
land for implementation of this model. The proposed activities for this model are listed below
1. Contour trenches (Continuous or staggered trench ) to conserve moisture in the field and to reduce
the erosion
2. Agro forestry plantation of the suitable tree species to develop eco environment and sink carbon
in the soil and solve the fuel problem in long term. Suitable tree like Desi Babool, Neem,
Sheeshum, Bans etc would be planted.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
91, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3. Grass land management- Choice of suitable grass to the area and it’s over seeding. To save from
erosion and provide the fodder to the village livestock during critical time.
4. Fencing – ditch cum bund fencing or stone fencing is required. However social fencing concept
will also adopted for successful pasture program.
5. Structures like gully plug, LSCD , Nala bund to reduce and check the velocity of water and
conserve the water to maintain moisture in the field
6. Structure like Nadi for storage of water
7. If needed minor masonry water tank to provide the water for plantation in critical period.
8. Horticulture plantation in the patch of the area
If PIA would not feel confident to cover the area for the above activity in a holistic manner than
individual activity would be implement in the non arable area like agro forestry, road side
plantation, horticulture orchard, trenches, CVH and Nadi etc
Nadi- It is one of the most common earthen structures constructed in the common land to store
the runoff. The earthen embankment is proposed of shape of half circular at suitable sites in the
common land. The height of the structure would be from 0.75 m to 2 meter. The length of the
Nadi would be as per need of the sites but it is approximately between 60 to 180 meter and
reduces and extends accordingly. Total 14 Nadi structures are proposed to intercept the runoff and
conserve the water in ground for three types of Nadi.
Agro Forestry Plantation- Few patches in the project area on common land would develop as
agro forestry plantation. The propose size of work is 16 ha. The plants suitable to project area like
Sheeshum, Neem, Desi Babool, Bamoboo, Khejri would be planted.
Botanical Park- It is proposed to develop 4 parks nearby temple or any public place where whole
community village will agreed. The tentative area of the park would be around 0.5 to 1 Ha. In the
park, activities like grass land, trenches, nursery, fencing, plantation, medicinal plantation and
flower cultivation would be proposed.
4.5 Drainage Line Treatment – This is the most important component of the works. However, in
project area, there are deep drainage line are found only in few villages due to comparatively
gentle slope. WDT technical carried out the technical survey L section of the important drainage
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
92, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
line and identified the important sites for the masonry check dam. Cross section of every
individual site has been carried out and design and estimate prepared accordingly.
Loose Stone Check Dam (LSCD) – This is the structured construct in the drain of the project
area to check the velocity of the water. This structure can be constructing from the available fair
size stone. This is dry stone masonry structure so workman ship of the work is very important.
This is the structure which is very important for the gully which is steep and broad. The size and
shape of the LSCD is depending on the condition of gully and size of available stone. These
structures are built in series in the drain and distance between two consecutive structures depends
on the grade of the drain.
ANICUT – This is weir structure construct in the big drain for control of the gully. It is a
permanent structure and the main purpose of this structure is to provide the irrigation to the
farmer’s field. Few structures which have already constructed earlier but not functioning well due
to need of repair and maintenance, also proposed in the action plan. L section and Cross section
survey of the selected location has been carried out. Technical design with four stability checks
prepared for each masonry structures. Map prepared by PD-CORE used for identification of sites.
Total eight structures identified.
Minor Masonry structure – This is the small weir structure constructed across the nala in the
low catchment area. In this structure, only head wall and extension wall along with apron is
constructed. The structure is suitable only in low catchment area and height up to 1.2 m. These
structures are proposed in second and third stream nalla with minor modification of the design of
anicut. Total 38 structures identified for this project.
4.6 Productivity Enhancement - This is the second most important component of the watershed
project. The key purpose of this component is to enhance the productivity of integrated Farming
System. This system comprises of Agriculture, Horticulture, Vegetable, Animal Husbandry, Dairy
etc in our project area.
The key objectives of the productivity enhancement component are
1) More income from farming system in limited land holding
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
93, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2) Optimum use of available resources with farmer for more income
3) Assured income for long term
4) Productivity enhancement
5) Awareness on crop diversification
6) Water productivity
Participatory Varietal Selection- This activity is proposed in the project area with the purpose
to make the project area self seed reliance and achieve seed security. Farmer will develop the
suitable seed of the certified variety in their own field in close observation of the WDT member’s
team. It will help in increase the area of local specific breeding seed and increases the SRR of the
main crops. The demonstration of crops like Moong, Maize, Jowar, Bajra, Gram and wheat would
be distribute for size of 0.4 ha per farmer. The cost of per demonstration is five thousands only.
Total 389 demonstrations proposed to this project.
Farm Mechanization- The key purpose of this activity is to aware the farmers about the improve
and modern tools in the agriculture to save their time, and improve efficiency. Few equipments
seed cum fertilizer drill, reaper, plough, thresher etc would be provide in a group to show the
importance of the improve quality of farm equipment to increases the productivity of the
agriculture and to save the input cost of the agriculture. The proposed cost of farm equipment per
demonstration is 1.0 lakhs and 0.50 lakhs for plant protection equipment.
Orchard Cultivation – The key purpose of this model is to attract project farmers towards
horticulture cultivation so few farmers those fulfill the criteria for successful model would be
selected for demonstration of horticulture orchard. This is a model in 1 to 2 acre area depend on
the availability of land holding with the farmer. Drip irrigation is proposed in the model and all
other necessary inputs will also give with the plants along with latest improve technology. The
selection of species of fruits would be mutually decided along with support from horticulture
department. As per norms of the common guidelines maximum support to farmer is 24,000 for
this purpose. Orchards like Papaya, Pomegranate, Leamon, Awla and Orange etc are suitable for
the area. 28 farmers would get the benefit from the project.
Kitchen Gardening- in this activity, it is proposed to distribute hybrid vegetable seeds to the
women of the house to grow nearby kitchen house. Protection of plant is the responsibility of the
owner of the house. Total 161 is proposed to this project. The key purpose of this model is to
motivate the farmers to grow vegetable in a small patch of their area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
94, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Medicinal Cultivation- Few demonstrations in the project area would develop on the farmer’s
field as well as community land to promote medicinal cultivation. Demonstration of
Aashwagandha, alovera, Safed musli etc would be develop in the project area with the farmers
those have additional land additional to routine cultivation. The proposed cost for per
demonstration from project cost is Rs 5000/- per demonstration.
Flower cultivation – It is also proposed to develop some demonstration of flower suitable to
agriclimate of the project area. Ajmer is famous for flower cultivation and set mechanism is
available for marketing so it could be a good opportunity for farmers.
Vermi compost: Vermi compost is organic manure (bio fertilizer) produced as the vermin
compost by earth worm biological waste material; plant residues. This compost is an odorless,
clean, organic material containing adequate quantities of N,P,K, and several micronutrients
essential for plant growth. Vermi compost is a preferred nutrient source for organic farming. It is
eco-friendly, non-toxic, consumes low energy input for composting and is a recycled biological
product. A maximum support of 20,000 would be provided from the project for shed house.
Approximately 10-12 units would be install within the shed.
4.7 Livestock Management-
Primary health camps – In the villages in the season with collaboration of veterinary department
Establish A.I units in the project area with necessary equipment like container, arrangement of
semen and needle. A young para professional would be trained for intensive training of 3 to 6
months with BAIF.
Provision of Improve Breed Cattle- Murrah for buffalo and Gir for Cow
Demonstration showing about nutritious and improve feeding practices of feed of Milch animal
Demonstration of improve forage crops
Construction of Pashu Naad for improve feeding practice of management
One model in each project village with one farmer who is progressive and have a number of milch
animal.
Establish Travis in project villages for treatment of cattle
4.8 Livelihood Enhancement - This is third most important component of the IWMP watershed
project. This component aims to maximize the utilization of potential generated by watershed
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
95, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
activities and creation of sustainable livelihoods and enhanced incomes for households within the
watershed area. This will facilitate inclusiveness through enhanced livelihood opportunities for
the poor through investment into assets, improvements in productivity and income, and access of
the poor to common resources and benefits and augment the livelihood strategy at household
level. It is envisaged in the guidelines that members of these families should become the member
of SHGs and these SHGs will prepare the livelihood action plan for the livelihood enhancement
of the SHGs members in a long term manner. The propose activities of the SHGs could be both in
farm sector or non farm sector.
In the project area many activities are suggested for the livelihood enhancement of the poor
families of the project area. It would certainly help in increase in their annual income and
generate additional fund to the family.
SHGs can undertake any permissible activity jointly as a group or the group may decide to
support individual(s) for the activities under the umbrella of the main SHG. In case of individual
support under the SHGs, the individuals will be accountable to the main SHG for finances and
performance. The support from the livelihood enhancement component would be given in two
ways
1. grant in aid – 30 % of the fund
2. revolving fund /seed money – 70 % of the fund
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
96, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
4.9 Special projects
PIA developed few ideas on the basis of discussion. The proposed special projects for the
livelihood enhancement manage by SHGs and federations are given below.
Seed Bank-
The concept of ‘village based seed bank’, (VBSB) which advocates village self-sufficiency in
production and distribution of quality seeds, is fast gaining ground. Many attempts are on to
revive the age-old concept of seed self-sufficiency. Seed villages or village seed banks operate
with utmost transparency, mutual trust and social responsibility of the seed farmer towards his
fellow farmers, and under peer supervision. Though this is not an entirely new concept to
villagers, it is being promoted to reduce their dependence on external inputs.
SHGs would Implementing the seed village concept in project villages started with
reconnaissance survey undertake to assess the ground situation and ascertain the demand for
seeds and understand the existing seed systems.
Steps of Seed Bank is –
1) Distributing breeder/founder seed to the farmers under participatory crop varietal selection of
different crops varieties to the interested farmers by following participatory approaches in
facilitation of the organization.
Key stake holders
SHGs member
SHG federation
Individual entrepreuner
Any poorer family belong
to project area
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
97, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
2) Selection of variety of seed bank after assessing the result and participatory discussion with the
farmers.
3) Selection of voluntary farmers willing to part of the seed bank SHGs
4) On farm training on Seed production techniques , INM,IPM, soil health and other issues
5) Seed production of selected different crops varieties
6) Procurement by the SHGs
7) Distributing to the other interested farmers
8) Certification process of seed in second year
9) Storage of seed at right place
10)Marketing of seed after consumption at village level
11)Multiplication of seed
12)Self reliance seed village
Expected Benefits-
Availability of improved varieties seed in sufficient quantity within the village.
Assured and timely supply of seed.
Decentralized seed production
Availability of improved variety seed at low price
Improved seed delivery system to resource-poor farmers
Reduced dependence on external seed sources and hence an effective measure to curb spurious
seed trade
Individual Farmer
Seed Production
Seed Storage
Seed Distribution
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
98, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Encourages village level trade and improves village economy
Scope for farmers participatory varietal selection
Breed Improvement –
Introduction - India has a very rich reservoir of genetic diversity and possesses some of the best
breeds of cattle and buffaloes in the world. The country’s population of 218.8 cattle accounts for
17% of the total world population of cattle. In this age of competitive world, a family cannot meet
all its requirements from a sole occupation like agriculture which is almost a loss-making
enterprise at the present context. Small land holding famers land in rainfed condition does not
provide the opportunity to the farmer to get good income from the agriculture. In such context, it
is necessary to provide subsidiary source of income sources of income generation to the peasant
communities which are complementary to agriculture and easy to manage without many
technicalities.
Dairy could be considered as a viable Income Generation Activity (IGA) for the project area but
in present time productivity of the animal is comparatively low and farmers knowledge and
practice of livestock management is not very encouraging. In project area almost every farmer has
cattle but majority of cattle population is desi so breed improvement in the project area will
surely help in improve the productivity result in enhance of income of the family so in the
watershed project, it is proposed to provide one Cow of Gir and One Buffalo of Murrah breed to
the SHG.
Objectives
Improve the milk productivity
Improve the feeding practices of livestock management.
Generate the additional source of income in the family
SHG would be fully responsible for the management of the project. SHG would identify the one
experience member from the village for look after of the milch animal. He would invest the
money on cattle rearing and charge for the cross breed of their local indigenous low yield animal
mutually decide in the SHG meeting from the village community. The resulting
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
99, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
upgraded/crossbred progeny with an improved genetic make up will have better milk yielding
capacity. One Integrated Livestock Development Centre at one gram Panchayat head quarter
covers all the 17 villages () falling within an area of 15 - 18 Kms from its location. One
programme operator, called 'Gopal' is posted at each of these centers.
To ensure the success of this programme, mass castration camps will organized in all the
villages to castrate the local stray bulls in order to avoid indiscriminate breeding.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
100, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER-5
WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN OF ALOLI
WATERSHED PROJECT
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
101, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter 5
WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN
5.1 Introduction
This is the most important chapter of the DPR descrbing about the watershed treatment plan of
the project and proposed physical and financial target of the project. The unit of action plan is at
gram panchyat as envisaged in the guidline and instructed by SLNA. PIA is taking care to
develop the plan after adopting latest change in the percentage wise allocation of budget.
The watershed project sanction year is 2010-11 however treatment plan is prepared for five years
i.e 2010-11 to 2015-16. Implementation phase is planned for only three years i.e from year 2012-
13 to 2014-15 and a part of 2015-16 is proposed for mehrukalan and same financial year is
proposed for consolidation phase. Gram panchyat wise action plan of works component has
developed only for three years.
41.85
198.30
322.16
121.35
44.58
15.00
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Year wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
102, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The proposed figure mention below shows the year wise expenditure in each component. The
plan is prepared as per norms envisaged in the common guidelines. First two year is planned for
preparatory phase, followed by three years and three month for works and last nine months for
consolidation phase. Year 2013-14 is the most important year for the project because maximum
fund is proposed for this year. 43.25% of the total fund is proposed for this year.
The figure mentioned above describe about the expenditure on each component. It has classified
as 75 % in works, 10% in administration, 5% in capacity building, 4% in EPA, 1% each in
monitoring, evaluation and DPR and 3 % in consolidation phase
5.62
26.62
43.25
16.29
5.99 2.01
Year wise proposed budget (in %)
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
10% 5%
4%
75%
1% 3% 1%1%
Percentage allocation of Budget
Adminstration Capacity Building EPA Works
DPR Preparation Consolidation Phase Monitoring Evaluation
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
103, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The above budget is classified according to the norms of the common guidelines. Maximum budget 84.6% is allocated to the watershed committee and minimum 1.35% to the SLNA.
74.48 37.24 29.79
558.60
7.45 22.34 7.45 7.450.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
Component wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
10.05 11.92
92.71
630.06
SLNA DWDC PIA WC
Stakeholders wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
104, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
.
1.35 1.60
12.45
84.59
Stakeholders wise budget (in %)
SLNA DWDC PIA WC
85.84
57.94
220.09
29.3117.25
6.7215.34 10.39
39.32
5.24 3.07 1.2513.75 9.34
35.30
4.70 2.71 1.04
Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Piplaj Gordha Kadera
Component wise budget
NRM PE LE
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
105, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Convergence – PIA would make sincere efforts for holistic development of the project area so
PIA would do dedicated efforts to convergence with the various departments like agriculture
department, horticulture department and NREGA. PIA also doing efforts to get the support from
health department, social and welfare department, TSC, Dairy etc
S.N
Activities Unit Unit Cost
ALOLI Mehrukalan Kadera
No Amount No Amount No Amount
NREGA
1 Earthen Bund Ha 0.21 30 6.3 50 10.5 5 1.05
2 NadI Nos 3.0 4 12 6 18 2 6
3 Renovation of structure
Nos 3.0 1 3 2 6 0 0
4 Apna Khet Apna Kam
Nos 1.0 5 5 10 10 2 2
26.3 44.5 9.05
Horticulture department
1 Horticulture Orchard
Nos 0.42 2 0.84 4 1.68 1 0.42
2 Drip irrigation set
Nos 0.45 2 0.9 4 1.8 1 0.45
3 Sprinklar irrigation set
Nos 0.5 2 1 2 1 1 0.5
4 Hybrid Vegetable
Nos 0.05 2 0.1 5 0.25 1 0.05
Agriculture department
2.84 4.73 1.42
1 Crops demonstration
0.02 6 0.12 10 0.2 2 0.04
2 farm pond 0.55 1 0.55 2 1.1 1 0.55
3 soil testing 400 0.2 500 0.25 0
0.87 1.55 0.59
Grand Total 30.01 50.70 11.06
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
106, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
S.N
Activities Unit Unit Cost
Sadara Gothara Piplaj
No Amount No Amount No Amount
NREGA
1 Earthen Bund Ha 0.21 30 6.3 10 2.1 0 0
2 NadI Nos 3.0 4 12 2 6 0 0
3 Renovation of structure
Nos 3.0 1 3 0 0 0 0
4 Apna Khet Apna Kam
Nos 1.0 5 5 2 2 2 0
26.3 10.5 0
Horticulture department
1 Horticulture Orchard
Nos 0.42 2 0.84 1 1.68 1 0.42
2 Drip irrigation set
Nos 0.45 2 0.9 1 1.8 1 0.45
3 Sprinklar irrigation set
Nos 0.5 2 1 1 1 1 0.5
4 Hybrid Vegetable
Nos 0.05 2 0.1 2 0.25 1 0.05
Agriculture department 2.84 4.73 1.42
1 Crops demonstration
Nos 0.02 10 2 5 0.1 2 0.04
2 farm pond Nos 0.55 2 1.1 1 1.1 1 0.55
3 soil testing Nos 0.2 0.25 0
3.3 1.35 0.59
Grand Total 32.44 16.58 2.01
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
107, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
OVERALL CONSOLIDATED PLAN for WORKS
S.No Name of Gram Panchyat
IWMP Convergence Total
1 Aloli 77.67 30.01 107.68
2 Mehra Kalan 294.71 50.70 345.41
3 Sadara 114.93 32.44 147.37
4 Kadera 9.01 11.06 20.07
5 Goardha 23.03 16.58 39.61
6 Piplaj 39.25 2.01 41.26
total 558.59 142.8 701.39
S.No Project Cost
1 IWMP 744.8
2 Convergence 142.8
Total 887.6
Ratio of convergence in total cost of project =16%
Overall project cost=14300/-
16% convergene proposed with main schemes only, efforsts will make to mobilize the financial resources with other schmes also for holistic development in a sustainable manner
84%16%
16%IWMP
Convergence
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
108, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER-6
EXPECTED OUTPUT OF THE PROJECT
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
109, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Chapter-6
Expected Outcomes of the Project
PIA has finalized the activities mentioned in chapter -5 to achieve the desire output of the project.
WDT members developed the specific strategy to achieve the goal of the project in planned
duration. The specific outcomes of the ALOLI project and the list of indicator to measure the
outcome is given below.
6.1 Gap Analysis –
Agriculture Sector
There are a number of factors determining the production potential of the particular crops. There
is large number of biotic or a-biotic production components responsible for the yielding ability of
a particular crop. These may be crop cultivar; climatic conditions especially the moisture index,
length of growing period of the crop, soil type, and nutrient availability in the soil, diseases and
pests incidence and agronomic practices, improper water management. The most important factor
is low percentage of seed replacement rate. Another important factor is the level of awareness
amongst the growers about the crop and production practices including post harvest management
also plays an important role in narrowing the productivity gap. It is therefore necessary to assess
the critical gaps, factors responsible for the gap, strategy to overcome the gap, approach and
methodology to be adopted to implement the strategy, its performance indicators followed by
Sustainability outputs of the activity.
Table-43 Comprataive analysis of productivity
Name of Crop
Yield in Qt/Ha
Project area Ajmer Rajasthan Average
India Average
Potential attainable yield
Bajra 15 15.5 24 19.85 18
Moong 5.75 4.5 3.1 3.5 6
Til 4 6 6.6 5.85 22.0
Jowar 5.5 4.2 8.5 7.5 6
Wheat 18-20 22.20 29.12 28.00 28
Gram 6 9.0 11.9 7.65 9
Maize 12-13.5 8.2 19.7 23.35 18
Cotton 10-11 14 6.5 7.2 12
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
110, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
The analysis of data reveals the fact that there is a gap in the yields of the main crops grown in the
project area with respect to the average productivity of the Average yield of Rajasthan and agro
climate zone. This gap is wide if we compare with the the potential attainable yield in ideal
condition. The main reason for low yield is lack of awareness among small and marginal
farmersa about the improve technology and practices, low seed replacement rate and available
supportive mechanism in the project area.
Reason for low productivity of agriculture
1. Majority of area is dependent on monsoon. Success or failure of monsoon determines the
success or failure of agriculture. Rainfall is generally unreliable due to erratic, inadequate
and uncertainty.
2. Lack of improve technology and modern practices in agriculture adopted by majority of
farmer
3. Lack of adequate farm mechanization in agriculture
4. Lack of good quality seed and fertilizer at time at optimum cost
5. Lack of facility for storage and marketing.
6. Low use efficiency of water
In the project, it is proposed to reach the potiential attainable yield which is mentioned in the
above table by bridge all the gaps. This additional production of 10 to 20 % in the all major
crops would help in increase the additional income sources of the farmers in the direction of
sustainable livelihoods.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
111, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Agriculture Sector
Issue Gap and factor responsible for gap Strategy
Variety of Seed Non availability of seed
Poor SRR rate
Lack of farmer awareness about
good quality of seed suitable to
that area
farmer lack of knowledge about
expiry of seed use by them
Market preference and
dominancy to decides the seed
Develop farmer awareness to
choose quality seed suitable to that
area
Crop demonstration through
participatory approaches
Increasing seed availability at
proper time
Develop seed production unit
Technology and
Practice
adopted in
agriculture
Lack of technical know how
about improve methods of
agriculture for sowing ,
weeding , harvesting etc
Lack of farm mechanization
Farmer attitude for low risk
taking capacity
Farmer hesitation for taking
initiatives
Lack of support to motivate
farmer from line
department/institute/NGO
Raising awareness through various
means
Demonstration of improved farm
equipments
Field training to demonstrate the
improve practices in field from
sowing to harvesting
exposure of farmer and build up their
capacity to motivate them for PTD
efforts to make collaboration with
institution and expert
Crop nutrition
and soil health
Farmer attention towards soil
health
Poor understanding of farmer
towards soil health and its
relation to plant uptake
Facility available for soil
testing
develop soil health card of the
individual farmer and motivate them
to use fertilizer pattern and nutrients
as per recommendation
Productivity of 10-50 % gap in productivity as Farmer capacity building for
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
112, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
crops compare to identified potential
yield of crop in context of
state.
technical knowhow is not up
to the mark
lack of supply of agriculture
input at time
Lack of irrigation facility
adopting improve practices and
modern technology in agriculture
Collective efforts to ensure
the supply of agriculture input
Introduction of Package of
INM and IPM and FYM
Address the issue of soil
fertility
Crop
diversification
Focus on mainly traditional
crops
Lack of exposure
lack of initiates
low risk taking capacity
Demonstrate horticulture orchard and
vegetable cultivation with few
progressive farmers
Water
productivity
Poor show of micro irrigation
system
Poor water use efficiency of
canal system
Demonstration of sprinkler and drip
irrigation system
water distribution change to improve
water use efficiency
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
113, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3.2 Livestock Sector
Issue Gap and factor responsible for gap Strategy
Productivity 30-50 % gap in productivity with
respect to potential yield of livestock
in project area
Lack of awareness and technical
know how about livestock rearing,
feeding management practice
Availability of desi breed
Improved breed by natural and
artificial method
demonstration of improve feeding
practices
demonstration of feeding trough
Health Lack of availability of facilities for
primary health treatment
lack of facilities for improve breed in
the project area
Capacity building of local youth for
primary health treatment
Provision of improve breed of cattle
Nutrition lack of technical know how about
improve feeding management
demonstration of improve feeding
practices
demonstration of forage crops
6.1 Expected Outcomes-
1. Employment Generation – This is one of the prominent features of IWMP is to create self
sustainable to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in employment opportunities.
Watershed creates employment opportunities during the work phase for labor intensive activities
like construction of earthen bund, farm pond, nadi, khadin and through the assets created under
watershed program have a direct impact on agriculture and natural resource development.
However NREGA help to provide 100 days employment to the families in year and watershed
project also would help to give ample opportunities to the poorest families of the project area in
whole seasons.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
114, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Indicators –
Project generate approximately 3 lakhs employment days for 3500 families of the project
area.
Increases in income by percentage allocation of 10 to 20 % for the families depend on the
wage labor for their livelihood.
Community gets the work in their field/village
2. Migration –It is below 20 % in the project area during planning phase and expected to decrease
up to 5-10 % at end of project. Those families migrated and exploiated at outer side will get
enabling environment and good wage in the village .
3. Irrigated area – Bench line survey reported that only 650 ha of the area under irrigation. It is
increased by 10% in the project area.
Pre status Post status
% Area % Area
20% 1233 30% 1850 Ha
4. Rise in ground water table – The land treatment work proposed in 3200 ha would certainly help
to conserve the moisture and recharge the ground water. The water table is 25-30 meter at now,
which would increases by 3 to 5 m by assuming the same exploitation of ground water or 25-30 m
at that time.
5. Drinking Water – All project villages’ community is accessed to safe and potable hygiene water
in all season in their villages within a reasonable reach.
6. Productivity of Agriculture - Productivity of agriculture is increased by 10 to 20 % of the major
crops. Please refer the gap analysis describe earlier in the same chapter for detail.
7. Productivity of Livestock- breed improvement of the livestock is the key focus of the project.
Productivity of livestock is increased by 20 to 30 %. the focus
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
115, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Indicator Pre Project Post Project
% of high breed in Cow Hardly 5 % More than 20 %
% of high breed in Buffalo Nil More than 20%
Milk productivity of cow 4-6 liter 6-8 liter
Milk productivity of buffalo 6-8 liter 8-10 liter
A.I Hardly 10 % cases More than 20 %
Goat Desi breed Improved breed
Goatry (4+1) model help to enhance the income of the poor families and improve breed of goat
help to improve the breed of the existing goat population of the project area.
8. Additional area under cultivation – Soil and Water conservation works help to increase the area
under cultivation. Land reclamation work proposed in this project and “apna khet apna kam
“under NREGA help to incresase the area under cultivation. Cultivable waste land would use for
cultivation and waste land which has no use would cover under pasture. Approximately 10 % of
the total area would cover under reclamation. It would help to improve the net sown area of the
project
9. Area under double crop and gross cropped area- access to irrigation facility help to increase
the double cropped area. It is expected to increase the gross cropped area by 10-12% which
resulted into enhance cropping intensity up to 150%.
10.Crop Diversification- At least 10 % of the farmers go with crop diversification and involve in
vegetable, medicinal and horticulture cultivation in their field along with medicinal and
floriculture.
11.Reduction in erosion – The soil and water conservation works in field help to minimize the
problem of land degradation. It is proposed to reduce soil erosion in the field by 20 to 30 %
12.Soil health –farmers move towards develop soil health card of their field. 40-50 % of farmer’s
use practicing of fertilizer and cropping pattern according to given recommendation of soil health.
13.Awareness about improve technology and modern practices in integrating farming sector –
by end of project, majority of farmers are well aware about technology and improve practices for
enhancement of productivity and adopting it in their practice. .
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
116, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
14.Water Productivity – increased by 15 to 20 %. Peoples are cultivating more area with same
water quantity of irrigation. Develop practices for saving of water and increased water use
efficiency.
15.Common property resources – all types of project community are easily access to CPR. They
are getting fodder and fuel wood adequate enough to fulfill their requirement. An institutional
mechanism developed for usufruct mechanism of the resources on the CPR.
16.Alternate source of livelihoods - 20 to 30 % of BPL families get sustainable source of livelihood
from the efforts of project.
17. Individual entrepreneur –10 poorest entrepreneurs linked with sustainable livelihood sources
and run their own enterprises.
18. Sustainability of SHGs – 50 % of SHGs or 60 SHGs linked with bank and micro enterprises.
They will also successfully gain the benefit of the revolving fund given under project and banks.
19.Extension services and supporting system in villages – strengthened in the village. Community
is easily access to input and knowledge in the village whenever required.
20.Participation of community – Project community are actively involved in the all phases of the
project and taking important decisions
21.Institution Development – at least 120 SHGs, 180 UGs, 6 subcommittee-watersheds and 1
federation formed in the project. all institutions form during the project and functioning
smoothly and involve in watershed project
22.Women empowerment- almost 60 % of the women is linked with SHGs. Actively involved and
participated in the gram sabha, put their issues and taking decision in the program run in the
village. Their attendance increased in meeting.
23.Organic Farming- At least 500 ha area comes under organic farming. Farmer sensitized towards
organic farming and using various means for develop organic fertilizer and replace with chemical
fertilizer.
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
117, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
6.2 Sustainability Indicator
WC is using WDF properly for the post project management and enhancement of income.
WC is qualifying and comes under grading of sustainable institution
All projects run by SHGs link with forward and backward linkages
Practitioners come to project area to see the impact and learn from the project
Government is ready to implement the project in adjoin area
Peoples are replicate the good practices of the project area in another area
All assets created during the project are functioning well and serve the purpose, they made for
All families in the project area have assured income source for their livelihoods.
6.3 Critical Assumption
No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters
Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before
irreversible damage is done.
Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed
particularly in the rural areas.
Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and
appropriate technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.
The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs
and feedback from participants.
The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District
and State level Implementing Agencies.
6.4 Output of Project
1. Farmer’s per capita income increased by 20-30 % due to agriculture and animal husbandry
intervention.
2. Land less and asset less linked with sustainable sources of income and lived happily
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
118, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
3. Institutions are capable enough to maximize the benefits in judicious manner and upscale the
available fund and sustain the project after exit of PIA.
4. Bio-diversity improved in the project area
5. Knowledge and skill enhanced of the community to get help them to enhance the livelihood
status.
Parameter Unit Pre Project status Post project status
Status of water table Meter 25-30 meter 30-35 meter
Storage Capacity of Water
Bodies
% 12 % more than 20 %
Literacy Rate % 67% 75 %
Availability of drinking water severe problem, non
hygienic
ensure safe and potable water
to all
Access to Irrigation facility Ha 1233 1850
Area under land degradation Ha
Area under micro irrigation Ha 25-30 Ha 100-120 Ha
Yield of Kharif crop % 20-50%
Yield of Rabi crop % 20-30 %
Area under horticulture No Nil 150 Ha
Area under vegetable No 20 Ha 110 Ha
Fodder production % Increased by 20-25%
Milk productivity % increased by 20-50%
Extension and supportive
mechanism
ensure facilities at doorstep of
farmers
SHGs in project area No nil 120
Migration % 5 to 35%in project villages reduced by 20%
Federation No nil 2
Area under private waste land 900 Ha 650 Ha
Women participation in
meeting
very low active participation and ensure
involvement in decision
making
No of skill person person 15-20
Fuel wood and fodder status face problem in drought ,
deficit by 20-40%
self sufficiency in all seaons
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
119, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
120, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
121, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
122, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
123, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer
124, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Alloli Rs in Lakhs 77.67
Villages - Alloli 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 60.5 0.15 9.08 20 3.00 40.5 6.08Type-II 20 0.20 4.00 10 2.00 10 2.00Type-III 20 0.22 4.40 10 2.20 10 2.20
2 Farm Pond Nos 1 0.32 0.32 0 0.00 1 0.323 Khadin Nos
Type-I 16 0.6 9.6 6 3.60 10 6.00Type-II 7 0.9 6.3 4 3.60 3 2.70Type-III 4 1.5 6 2 3.00 2 3.00Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00
4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 1 0.3 0.3 0 0.00 1 0.30
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 4 0.12 0.48 0 0.00 4 0.48
6 Ha 0 0.3 0 0.00 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 42.48 17.40 25.08B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 2 1.26 2.52 0.5 0.63 1.5 1.89
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 6 0.15 0.9 3 0.45 3 0.45
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 6 0.22 1.32 0 0.00 6 1.32
5 Nadi NoType -I 1 1.30 1.3 1 1.30 0 0.00Type-II 1 2.50 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Physical Target
Financial Target
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 1 3.00 3 0.00 1 3.00Sub total (Non arable ) 11.54 2.38 9.16
C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00
Type-I 6 0.39 2.34 0 0.00 6 2.34Type-II 1 0.75 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 2 0.13 0.26 2 0.31 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 1 0.21 0.26 1 0.21 0 0.00
4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 3.97 1.63 2.34
Total (NRM) 57.99 21.41 36.58
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 33 0.05 1.650 13 0.65 20 1.00
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 4 0.24 0.960 0 0.00 4 0.96
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 20 0.08 1.500 0 0.00 20 1.50
4 No 5 0.10 0.500 0 0.00 5 0.50
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 4 0.06 0.240 0 0.00 4 0.24
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20
7 NADEP composting No 4 0.12 0.480 0 0.00 4 0.48
8 Vermi Composting Model No 4 0.20 0.800 2 0.40 2 0.40
9 Soil health card of farmers No 110 0.00 0.03 50 0.02 60 0.02
10 Promotion of organic farming No 4 0.05 0.200 2 0.10 2 0.10
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 50 0.01 0.500 50 0.50 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 4 0.20 0.800 2 0.40 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 1 0.10 0.100 1 0.10 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 4 0.12 0.450 4 0.45 0 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 1 0.05 0.050 0 0.00 1 0.05
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20
17 No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.000 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 2 0.10 0.200 0.00 2 0.20
20 Breed improvement for improve Goat No 2 0.30 0.600 2 0.60 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model No 2 0.35 0.700 2 0.70 0.00
Sub total (PE) 10.36 3.92 6.45
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 5.59 2.80 2.80
2 2.80 1.40 1.40
3 No 0.93 0.47 0.47
9.32 4.66 4.66Grand Total 77.67 29.99 47.68
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Sadara Rs in Lakhs 114.92
Villages - Sadara, Sadari 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HAType-1 132 0.15 19.80 50 7.50 82 12.30 0 0.00Type-II 50 0.20 10.00 25 5.00 25 5.00 0 0.00Type-III 20 0.22 4.40 10 2.20 10 2.20 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 4 0.32 1.28 2 0.64 2 0.64 0 0.00
3 Khadin Nos
Type-I 12 0.6 7.2 4 2.40 8 4.80 0 0.00Type-II 10 0.9 9 4 3.60 6 5.40 0 0.00Type-III 8 1.5 12 4 6.00 4 6.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00
4 Ha 4 0.3 1.2 2 0.60 2 0.60 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 6 0.12 0.72 0 0.00 2 0.24 4 0.48
6 Nos 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 67.60 27.94 39.18 0.48B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 1.5 1.26 1.89 0 0.00 1 1.26 0.5 0.63
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 6 0.15 0.9 2 0.30 4 0.60 0 0.00
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 6 0.22 1.32 0 0.00 6 1.32 0 0.005 Nadi No
Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30 0 0.00Type-II 1 2.50 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Physical Target
Unit Cost
Financial Target
Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.006 Road side plantation Km 1 1.00 1 0 0.00 1 1.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 1 3.00 3 0.00 1 3.00 0 0.00
Sub total (Non arable ) 13.21 1.60 10.98 0.63C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment
1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos
Type-I 4 0.39 1.56 2 0.78 2 0.78 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.75 1.5 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 LSCD NosType-I 5 0.13 0.65 5 0.65 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0.00 0.00Type-III 1 0.21 0.18 1 0.18 0.00 0.00
4 Nos 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 5 2.72 2.28 0Total (NRM) 85.81 32.26 52.44 1.11
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 61 0.05 3.05 11 0.55 30 1.50 20 1.00
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 6 0.24 1.44 0 0.00 6 1.44 0 0.00
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 30 0.08 2.25 0 0.00 20 1.50 10 0.75
4 No 8 0.10 0.80 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.80
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 4 0.06 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.24
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 4 0.05 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.20
7 NADEP composting No 6 0.12 0.72 0 0.00 4 0.48 2 0.24
8 Vermi Composting Model No 6 0.20 1.20 0 0.00 2 0.40 4 0.80
9 Soil health card of farmers No 600 0.00 0.16 200 0.04 200 0.06 200 0.06
10 Promotion of organic farming No 4 0.05 0.20 2 0.10 2 0.10 0 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 50 0.01 0.50 20 0.20 10 0.10 20 0.20
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 6 0.20 1.20 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 1 0.10 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 8 0.12 0.96 4 0.48 4 0.48 0 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10 0 0.0016 Demonstration of Forage crops No 10 0.05 0.50 4 0.20 6 0.30 0 0.00
17 No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 6 0.30 4 0.20
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.0019 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 2 0.10 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20
20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 1 0.30 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.30 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model 2 0.35 0.70 0 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35Sub total (PE) 15.32 2.07 7.81 5.44
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 8.27 3.31 3.31 1.65
2 4.14 1.66 1.66 0.83
3 No 1.38 0 0.55 0.55 0.28
13.79 5.52 5.52 2.76Grand Total 114.92 39.85 65.77 9.31
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan
Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan
Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Kadera Rs in Lakhs 9
Villages - Deopura 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 20 0.15 3.00 20 3.00Type-II 0 0.20 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.22 0.00 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 1 0.32 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos
Type-I 2 0.6 1.2 2 1.20Type-II 0 0.9 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.5 0 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 0 2 0 0 0.00
4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 0 0.3 0 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 1 0.12 0.12 1 0.12
6 0 0.3 0 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 4.64 4.64B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0 0.15 0 0 0.00
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 0 0.22 0 0 0.00
5 Nadi NoType -I 1 1.30 1.3 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00
Physical Target
Financial Target
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 1.30 1.30
C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos
1.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00
1.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00
2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) NosType-I 2 0.39 0.78 2 0.78Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00
3 LSCD NosType-I 0 0.13 0 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.18 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00
4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 0.78 0.78Total (NRM) 6.72 6.72
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 12 0.05 0.60 0 0.00 12 0.60
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 1 0.24 0.24 0 0.00 1 0.24
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 0 0.08 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 0 0.06 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 0 0.12 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 0 0.20 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
9 Soil health card of farmers No 40 0.00 0.01 20 0.01 20 0.01
10 Promotion of organic farming No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 0 0.01 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 2 0.20 0.35 1 0.15 1 0.20
13 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 0 0.12 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
17 No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
20 Breed improvement- Goat No 0 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model 0 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub total (PE) 1.20 0.16 1.05
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 0.65 0.39 0.26
2 0.32 0.19 0.13
3 No 0.11 0.07 0.04
1.08 0.65 0.43Grand Total 9.00 7.52 1.48
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Piplaj Rs in Lakhs 39.24
Villages - Gothra 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 48 0.15 7.20 25 3.75 23 3.45Type-II 10.5 0.20 2.10 6 1.20 4.5 0.90Type-III 5 0.22 1.10 5 1.10 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 1 0.32 0.32 1 0.32 0 0.003 Khadin Nos
Type-I 4 0.6 2.4 2 1.20 2 1.20Type-II 6 0.9 5.4 3 2.70 3 2.70Type-III 1 1.5 1.5 0 0.00 1 1.50Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00
4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 1 0.3 0.3 0 0.00 1 0.30
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 3 0.12 0.36 0 0.00 3 0.36
6 No 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 22.68 10.27 12.41B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00 0 02 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 4 0.15 0.6 2 0.30 2 0.303 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 4 0.22 0.88 0 0.00 4 0.885 Nadi No
Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0.00 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 0.5 1.00 0.5 0 0.00 0.5 0.50
Physical Target
Financial Target
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 4.58 1.60 2.98
C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos1.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00
Type-I 3 0.39 1.17 2 0.78 1 0.39Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 4 0.13 0.51 4 0.51 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 2.04 1.65 0.39
Total (NRM) 29.30 13.52 15.78
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 20 0.05 1.00 0.00 20 1.00
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 3 0.24 0.72 0 0.00 3 0.72
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 6 0.08 0.45 0 0.00 6 0.45
4 No 3 0.10 0.30 0 0.00 3 0.30
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 2 0.06 0.12 0 0.00 2 0.12
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 2 0.05 0.10 0 2 0.10
7 NADEP composting No 2 0.12 0.24 2 0.24 0 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 2 0.20 0.40 0.00 2 0.40
9 Soil health card of farmers No 100 0.00 0.03 50 0.02 50 0.02
10 Promotion of organic farming No 2 0.05 0.10 2 0.10 0 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 19 0.01 0.19 10 0.10 9 0.09
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 3 0.20 0.60 1 0.20 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 1 0.10 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 2 0.12 0.23 2 0.23 0 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 1 0.05 0.05 0 0.00 1 0.04
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10
17 No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 1 0.10 0.10 0.00 1 0.10
20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 1 0.30 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.30
21 Bio-Energy model 0 0.35 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (PE) 5.23 0.99 4.24
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
2 2.82 1.69 1.13
3 1.41 0.85 0.56
4 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 0.47 0.28 0.19
4.70 2.82 1.88Grand Total 39.23 17.33 21.90
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Gordha Rs in Lakhs 23.04 Villages -Amli, Mehrukhurd 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 50 0.15 7.50 20 3.00 30 4.50Type-II 10 0.20 2.00 5 1.00 5 1.00Type-III 0 0.22 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 0 0.32 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.003 Khadin Nos
Type-I 5 0.6 3 2 1.20 3 1.80Type-II 2 0.9 1.8 1 0.90 1 0.90Type-III 0 1.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 0 2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 2 0.12 0.24 0 0.00 2 0.24
6 No 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 14.54 6.10 8.44B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00 0 02 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 2 0.15 0.3 1 0.15 1 0.153 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 1.5 0.22 0.33 0 0.00 1.5 0.335 Nadi No
Type -I 1 1.30 1.3 0 0.00 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Physical Target
Financial Target
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Sub total (Non arable ) 1.93 0.15 1.78C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment
1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00
Type-I 2 0.39 0.73 2 0.73 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.18 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 0.73 0.73 0
Total (NRM) 17.20 6.98 10.22
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 12 0.05 0.60 0.00 12 0.60
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 2 0.24 0.48 0 0.00 2 0.48
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 5 0.08 0.38 0 0.00 5 0.38
4 No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 0 0.06 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 2 0.12 0.24 0 0.00 2 0.24
8 Vermi Composting Model No 2 0.20 0.40 0.00 2 0.40
9 Soil health card of farmers No 100 0.00 0.03 100 0.03 0 0.00
10 Promotion of organic farming No 1 0.05 0.05 1 0.05
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 10 0.01 0.10 10 0.10 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 2 0.20 0.40 1 0.20 1 0.20
13 Establish Travis in the village No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 2 0.12 0.24 2 0.24 0 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 1 0.05 0.05 0 0.00 1 0.05
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10
17 No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 0 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model No 0 0.35 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (PE) 3.07 0.57 2.50
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
2 1.66 1.00 0.66
3 0.82 0.49 0.33
4 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 0.28 0.17 0.11
2.76 1.66 1.10Grand Total 23.03 9.21 13.82
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan
CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN
Gram Panchyat Mehrukalan Rs in Lakhs 294.73
Villages - Balapura, Nayagaon, Mehrukalan 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 250 0.15 37.50 80 12.00 120 18.00 50 7.50 0.00Type-II 160 0.20 32.00 50 10.00 60 12.00 50 10.00 0.00Type-III 40 0.22 8.80 20 4.40 20 4.40 0 0.00 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 6 0.32 1.92 2 0.64 4 1.28 0 0.00 0.003 Khadin Nos
Type-I 51 0.6 30.6 11 6.60 30 18.00 10 6.00 0.00Type-II 23 0.9 20.7 6 5.40 10 9.00 7 6.30 0.00Type-III 10 1.5 15 2 3.00 6 9.00 2 3.00 0.00Type-IV(special) 4 2 8 1 2.00 2 4.00 1 2.00 0.00
4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 4 0.3 1.2 2 0.60 2 0.60 0 0.00 0.005 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 12 0.12 1.44 0 0.00 4 0.48 8 0.96 0.00
6 No 15 0.3 4.5 5 1.50 5 1.50 5 1.50 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 161.66 46.14 78.26 37.26B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 5 1.26 6.3 1 1.26 3 3.78 1 1.26 0.002 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 15 0.15 2.25 5 0.75 10 1.50 0 0.00 0.003 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 15 0.22 3.3 0 0.00 10 2.20 5 1.10 0.005 Nadi No 0.00
Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30 0 0.00 0.00Type-II 2 2.50 5 0.00 1 2.50 1 2.50 0.00Type-III 1 4.00 4 0.00 1 4.00 0 0.00 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 2 1.00 2 0 0.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 0.007 Botanical Park No 2 3.00 6 0.00 1 3.00 1 3.00 0.00
Physical Target
Financial Target
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Sub total (Non arable ) 31.45 3.31 19.28 8.86C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment
1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 1 2.5 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00 0.001.2 Type-II 2 5 10 0.00 1 5.00 1 5.00 0.003 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00
Type-I 10 0.39 3.9 4 1.56 6 2.34 0 0.00 0.00Type-II 6 0.75 4.5 3 2.25 3 2.25 0 0.00 0.00Type-III 2 1.2 2.4 0 0.00 1 1.20 1 1.20 0.00
4 LSCD NosType-I 8 0.13 1.04 4 0.52 4 0.52 0.00 0.00Type-II 4 0.18 0.72 4 0.72 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Type-III 2 0.21 0.41 2 0.41 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 Nos 2 0.75 1.5 1 0.75 1 0.75 0.00 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 26.97 6.21 14.56 6.2Total (NRM) 220.08 55.66 112.10 52.32
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 251 0.05 12.55 50 2.50 75 3.75 75 3.75 51 2.55
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 12 0.24 2.88 0 0.00 6 1.44 6 1.44 0.00
3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 100 0.08 7.50 0 0.00 40 3.00 60 4.50 0.00
4 No 15 0.10 1.50 0 0.00 10 1.00 5 0.50 0.00
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 8 0.06 0.48 0 0.00 4 0.24 4 0.24 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 5 0.05 0.25 0 0 0.00 5 0.25 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 15 0.12 1.80 5 0.60 5 0.60 5 0.60 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 10 0.20 2.00 0 0.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 0.009 Soil health card of farmers No 350 0.00 0.11 100 0.03 100 0.03 150 0.05 0.00
10 Promotion of organic farming No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 4 0.20 6 0.30 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 100 0.01 1.00 40 0.40 40 0.40 20 0.20 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 9 0.20 1.80 3 0.60 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 2 0.10 0.20 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 15 0.12 1.80 5 0.60 5 0.60 5 0.60 0.00
15 Primary health kit for livestock No 3 0.05 0.13 1 0.03 2 0.10 0 0.00 0.00
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 15 0.05 0.75 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.25 0.00
17 No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 0.00
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.90 0.90 0 0.00 1 0.90 0 0.00 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 3 0.10 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.10 2 0.20 0.00
20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 2 0.30 0.60 0 0.00 2 0.60 0 0.00 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model 5 0.35 1.75 0 2 0.70 3 1.05
Sub total (PE) 39.30 5.21 15.56 15.58 2.95
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 21.22 4.24 6.37 8.49 2.12
2 10.61 2.12 3.18 4.24 1.06
3 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 3.54 0.71 1.06 1.42 0.35
35.37 7.07 10.61 14.15 3.54Grand Total 294.75 67.94 138.27 82.04 6.49
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan
CHAPTER-3 GRAM PANCHYAT WISE WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Piplaj, Gordha, Mehrukalan Rs in Lakhs
Villages - Piplaj Gordha Mehrukalan
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 0.15 48 7.20 50 7.50 250 37.50Type-II 0.20 10.5 2.10 20 4.00 0 0.00Type-III 0.22 5 1.10 20 4.40 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 0.32 1 0.32 1 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 0.6 4 2.40 16 9.60 2 1.20Type-II 0.9 6 5.40 7 6.30 0 0.00Type-III 1.5 1 1.50 4 6.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 2 1 2.00 1 2.00 0 0.00
4 Ha 0.3 1 0.30 1 0.30 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 0.12 3 0.36 4 0.48 1 0.12
6 No 0.3 0 0.00 0 0.00 15 4.50
Sub total -(Arable ) 22.68 40.90 43.64B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Ha 1.26 0 0.00 2 2.52 0 0.00
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0.15 4 0.60 6 0.90 0 0.00
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 0.22 4 0.88 6 1.32 0 0.005 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Type -I 1.30 2 2.60 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 2.50 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 1.00 0.5 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 3.00 0 0.00 1 3.00 0 0.00
Sub total (Non arable ) 4.58 11.54 1.30C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment
1 ANICUT Nos 0.001.1 Type-I 2.5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Nos 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 0.39 3 1.17 6 2.34 2 0.78Type-II 0.75 0 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 1.2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Type-I 0.13 4 0.52 2 0.26 0 0.00
Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Pasture Development and Agro Forestry
Minor Masnory Structure(MMS)
Type-II 0.18 2 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0.21 0 0.00 1 0.21 0 0.00
4 Nos 0.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 2.05 3.92 0.78Total (NRM) 29.31 56.36 45.72
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 0.05 20 1.00 33 1.65 12 0.60
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 0.24 3 0.72 4 0.96 1 0.24
3 No 0.08 6 0.45 20 1.50 0 0.00
4 No 0.10 3 0.30 5 0.50 0 0.00
5 No 0.06 2 0.12 4 0.24 0 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 0.12 2 0.24 4 0.48 0 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 0.20 2 0.40 4 0.80 0 0.00
9 Soil health card of farmers No 0.00 100 0.03 110 0.03 40 0.01
10 Promotion of organic farming No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 0.01 19 0.19 50 0.50 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 0.20 3 0.60 4 0.80 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 0.12 2 0.24 4 0.48 0 0.00
15 No 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00
16 No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00
17 No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00
18 No 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 0 0.00
20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60 0 0.0021 Bio-Energy model 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 1.75
Sub total (PE) 5.24 9.69 1.25
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation Demonstration of Spice cultivation
Primary health kit for livestock
Demonstration of Forage crops
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management Breed Improvement - Natural method
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 40.21 13.43 14.52
2 20.10 6.71 7.26
3 No 6.71 2.24 2.42
67.02 22.37 24.20Grand Total 101.57 88.43 71.18
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan
Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner
CHAPTER-3 GRAM PANCHYAT WISE WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Sadara, Alloli, Kadera Rs in Lakhs
Villages - Sadara Alloli Kadera
S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 0.15 132 19.80 60.5 9.08 20 3.00Type-II 0.20 50 10.00 20 4.00 0 0.00Type-III 0.22 20 4.40 20 4.40 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 0.32 4 1.28 1 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 0.24 12 2.88 16 3.84 2 0.48Type-II 0.4 10 4.00 7 2.80 0 0.00Type-III 0.6 8 4.80 4 2.40 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 0 0.00
4 Ha 0.35 4 1.40 1 0.35 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 0.12 6 0.72 4 0.48 1 0.12
6 No 0.15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 50.28 28.67 3.92B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Ha 1.26 1.5 1.89 2 2.52 0 0.00
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0.15 6 0.90 6 0.90 0 0.00
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 1.36 6 8.16 6 8.16 0 0.00
5 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type -I 1.30 2 2.60 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 2.50 1 2.50 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 1.00 1 1.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 3.00 1 3.00 1 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 20.05 18.38 1.30
C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.00
1.1 Type-I 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 3.5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 0.39 4 1.56 6 2.34 2 0.78Type-II 0.75 2 1.50 1 0.75 0 0.00
Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Pasture Development and Agro Forestry
Type-III 1.2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.004 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 0.13 5 0.65 2 0.26 0 0.00Type-II 0.18 2 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0.21 1 0.21 1 0.21 0 0.00
5 Nos 1.5 1 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 5.78 3.92 0.78Total (NRM) 76.11 50.97 6.00
B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES
1 No 0.05 61 3.05 33 1.65 12 0.60
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 0.24 6 1.44 4 0.96 1 0.24
3 No 0.08 30 2.25 20 1.50 0 0.00
4 No 0.10 8 0.80 5 0.50 0 0.00
5 No 0.06 4 0.24 4 0.24 0 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0.05 4 0.20 4 0.20 0 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 0.12 6 0.72 4 0.48 0 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 0.20 6 1.20 4 0.80 0 0.00
9 Soil health card of farmers No 0.00 600 0.18 110 0.03 40 0.01
10 Promotion of organic farming No 0.05 4 0.20 4 0.20 0 0.00
11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 0.05 50 2.50 50 2.50 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 0.20 6 1.20 4 0.80 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00
14 Manger for livestock No 0.12 8 0.96 4 0.48 0 0.0015 Primary health kit for livestock No 0.05 2 0.10 1 0.05 0 0.0016 Demonstration of Forage crops No 0.05 10 0.50 4 0.20 0 0.00
17 No 0.05 10 0.50 4 0.20 0 0.00
18 No 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 0 0.00
20 No 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model No 2 0.00 2 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (PE) 16.64 11.69 1.25
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation Demonstration of Spice cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management Breed Improvement - Natural method
Breed improvement- Goatry model(4+1)
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
2 40.21 13.43 14.52
3 20.10 6.71 7.26
4 No 6.71 2.24 2.42
67.02 22.37 24.20Grand Total 159.77 85.03 31.46
Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner
CHAPTER-5 CONSOLIDATED WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Mehrukalan, Gordha, Piplaj, Kadera, Sadara, Alloli Rs in Lakhs 558.59
Villages - 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
S.No Name of Activity
Unit Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development
1 Field Bund HaType-1 560.5 0.15 84.08 215 32.25 295.5 44.33 50 7.50 0 0.00Type-II 250.5 0.20 50.10 96 19.20 104.5 20.90 50 10.00 0 0.00Type-III 85 0.22 18.70 45 9.90 40 8.80 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 Farm Pond Nos 13 0.32 4.16 6 1.92 7 2.24 0 0.00 0 0.003 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Type-I 90 0.6 54 27 16.20 53 31.80 10 6.00 0 0.00Type-II 48 0.9 43.2 18 16.20 23 20.70 7 6.30 0 0.00Type-III 23 1.5 34.5 8 12.00 13 19.50 2 3.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 7 2 14 1 2.00 5 10.00 1 2.00 0 0.00
4 Ha 10 0.3 3 4 1.20 6 1.80 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 28 0.12 3.36 1 0.12 15 1.80 12 1.44 0 0.00
6 No 15 0.3 4.5 5 1.50 5 1.50 5 1.50 0 0.00
Sub total -(Arable ) 313.60 112.49 163.37 37.74 0.00B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development
1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 8.5 1.26 10.71 1.5 1.89 5.5 6.93 1.5 1.89 0 0.00
2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 33 0.15 4.95 13 1.95 20 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 Agro Forestry Ha 32.5 0.22 7.15 0 0.00 27.5 6.05 5 1.10 0 0.005 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Type -I 9 1.30 11.7 5 6.50 4 5.20 0 0.00 0 0.00
Physical Target
Unit Cost
Financial Target
Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land
Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river
Type-II 4 2.50 10 0 0.00 3 7.50 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 1 4.00 4 0 0.00 1 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
6 Road side plantation Km 3.5 1.00 3.5 0 0.00 2.5 2.50 1 1.00 0 0.00
7 Botanical Park No 4 3.00 12 0 0.00 3 9.00 1 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 64.01 10.34 44.18 9.49 0.00
C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.001.1 Type-I 1 2.5 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 2 4.98 9.96 0 0.00 1 4.98 1 4.98 0 0.003 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Type-I 27 0.39 10.53 12 4.68 15 5.85 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 9 0.75 6.75 5 3.75 4 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 2 1.2 2.4 0 0.00 1 1.22 1 1.22 0 0.00
4 LSCD Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Type-I 19 0.13 2.47 15 1.91 4 0.52 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 10 0.18 1.8 10 1.80 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 4 0.21 0.84 4 0.84 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 Nos 3 0.75 2.25 1 0.75 2 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub total (DLT) 39.5 13.73 19.57 6.2 0
Total (NRM) 417.11 136.56 227.12 53.43 0.00
RWH at Individual house/Common structure
B-PRODUCTIVITY SYSTEM
1 No 389 0.05 19.45 74 3.70 169 8.45 95 4.75 51 2.55
2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 28 0.24 6.72 0 0.00 22 5.28 6 1.44 0 0.003 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 161 0.08 12.08 0 0.00 91 6.83 70 5.25 0 0.00
4 No 31 0.10 3.10 0 0.00 18 1.80 13 1.30 0 0.00
5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 18 0.06 1.08 0 0.00 10 0.60 8 0.48 0 0.00
6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 15 0.05 0.75 0 0.00 6 0.30 9 0.45 0 0.00
7 NADEP composting No 29 0.12 3.48 7 0.84 15 1.80 7 0.84 0 0.00
8 Vermi Composting Model No 24 0.20 4.80 2 0.40 13 2.60 9 1.80 0 0.00
9 Soil health card of farmers No 1300 0.00 0.39 520 0.16 430 0.13 350 0.11 0 0.00
10 Promotion of organic farming No 21 0.05 1.05 6 0.30 9 0.45 6 0.30 0 0.00
11 Gypsum for land reclamation No 229 0.01 2.29 130 1.30 59 0.59 40 0.40 0 0.00
12 Organize Veternery Camps No 26 0.20 5.20 10 2.00 10 2.00 4 0.80 2 0.40
13 Establish Travis in the village No 5 0.10 0.50 5 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.0014 Manger for livestock No 31 0.12 3.72 17 2.04 9 1.08 5 0.60 0 0.0015 Primary health kit for livestock No 8 0.05 0.40 1 0.05 7 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00
16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 33 0.05 1.52 9 0.45 19 0.82 5 0.25 0 0.00
17 No 26 0.05 1.30 0 0.00 17 0.85 9 0.45 0 0.00
18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.90 0.90 0 0.00 1 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00
19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 8 0.10 0.80 0 0.00 4 0.40 4 0.40 0 0.00
20 Breed improvement- Goatry model(4+1) No 6 0.30 1.80 2 0.60 4 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00
21 Bio-Energy model 9 0.35 3.15 2 0.70 3 1.05 4 1.40 0 0.00
Sub total (PE) 74.48 13.04 37.47 21.02 2.95
Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration
Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation
Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management
C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT
1 40.23 1.21 20.35 15.18 3.48
2 20.10 0.61 10.17 7.59 1.74
3 No 6.70 0.20 3.39 2.53 0.58
67.03 2.02 33.91 25.30 5.80Grand Total 558.61 151.62 298.50 99.75 8.75
Revolving fund to SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Revolving fund to individual entrepreuners
ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECTPANCHYAT SAMITI-KEKRI DISTRICT AJMER
SUMMARY SHEET OF GRAM PANCHYATS OF WORKS COMPONENT
Sanction CostWORKS Percentage allocation
Total SWC PE LE SWC PE LESadara 153.24 114.93 85.81 15.32 13.79 56.00 10.00 9.00Alloli 103.56 77.67 57.99 10.36 9.32 56.00 10.00 9.00Mehrukalan 393.00 294.75 220.08 39.30 35.37 56.00 10.00 9.00Piplaj 52.32 39.24 29.30 5.23 4.71 56.00 10.00 9.00Gordha 30.72 23.04 17.20 3.07 2.76 56.00 10.00 9.00Kadera 12.00 9.00 6.72 1.20 1.08 56.00 10.00 9.00
744.84 558.63 417.11 74.48 67.04The proposed allocation of budget is as per norms of the common guidelines, hence it is O.K
NRM PE LESadara 85.81 15.32 13.79Alloli 57.99 10.36 9.32Mehrukalan 220.08 39.30 35.37Piplaj 29.30 5.23 4.70Gordha 17.20 3.07 2.76Kadera 6.72 1.20 1.08
Name of Gram Panchyat
Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Piplaj Gordha Kadera
85.81
57.99
220.08
29.3017.20
6.7215.32 10.36
39.30
5.23 3.07 1.2013.79 9.32
35.37
4.70 2.76 1.08
Component wise budget
NRMPELE
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET OF ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT ( Rs in Lakhs)
S.No Head
Year
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-171 Adminstration 10 74.48 9.85 14.48 14.52 14.52 13.51 7.552 Capacity Building 5 37.24 9.01 15.12 7.52 2.61 2.95 0.003 EPA 4 29.79 18.00 11.79 0.00 0.00 0.004 Works 75 558.60 0.00 113.72 223.88 74.81 6.56 05 DPR Preparation 1 7.45 3.50 3.956 Consolidation Phase 3 22.34 17.88 4.477 Monitoring 1 7.45 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.498 Evaluation 1 7.45 1.49 2.98 2.98
744.80 41.85 160.55 247.41 96.41 42.39 15.00
Adminstration 74.48Capacity Building 37.24EPA 29.79Works 558.60DPR Preparation 7.45Consolidation Phase 22.34Monitoring 7.45Evaluation 7.45
Percentage Allocation
Financial Target
Adminstration Capacity Building
EPAWorks
DPR PreparationConsolidation Phase
Monitoring Evaluation
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
74.4837.24 29.79
558.60
7.45 22.34 7.45 7.45
Component wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-1741.85 198.30 322.16 121.35 44.58 15.00
5.62 26.62 43.25 16.29 5.99 2.01
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
41.85
198.30
322.16
121.35
44.58
15.00
Year wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-175.62 26.62 43.25 16.29 5.99 2.01
Adminstration 10Capacity Building 5
5.62
26.62
43.25
16.29
5.99 2.01
Year wise proposed budget (in %)
2011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-17
EPA 4Works 75
DPR Preparation 1Consolidation Phase 3
Monitoring 1Evaluation 1
10%
5%
4%
75%
1% 3% 1% 1%
Percentage allocation of Budget
Adminstration Capacity Building EPAWorksDPR PreparationConsolidation PhaseMonitoring Evaluation
STAKEHOLDER WISE BUDGET ALLOCATION OF ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECTRs in Lakhs
COMPONENTPercentage allocation as per guidelines Budget
SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WCADMINISTRATION 10 74.48 7.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 52.14 22.35EVALUATION 1 7.45 0.20 0.20 0.60 1.49 1.49 4.47 0.00MONITORING 1 7.45 1.00 7.45 0.00 0.00 0.00CAPACITY BUILDING 5 37.24 0.05 1.30 3.65 0.37 9.68 27.19 0.00DPR 1 7.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 7.45 0.00EPA 4 29.79 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.79WORKS 56 417.11 56.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 417.11Production System 10 74.48 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.48Livelyhood 9 67.04 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.04CONSOLIDATION 3 22.35 0.10 0.10 0.20 2.60 0.74 0.74 1.49 19.37
100 744.84 1.35 1.60 12.45 84.60 10.06 11.92 92.73 630.13
Allocation (in %)
Sanction budget
YEAR WISE BUDGETING OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS UNDER ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT
COMPONENT SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC
YEAR 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
ADMINISTRATION 6.90 2.95 10.14 4.34 10.16 4.36EVALUATION 1.49MONITORING 1.49 1.49
CAPACITY BUILDING 0.07 1.49 7.45 0.22 3.72 11.17 0.07 3.72 3.72
DPR 3.50 3.95EPA 14.00 15.79WORKS 113.72 223.88Production System 19.71 38.81Livelyhood 18.19 35.82CONSOLIDATION Total 0.07 1.49 17.85 16.95 1.71 3.72 25.26 171.75 3.05 3.72 13.88 302.87
SLNA DWDC PIA WC
10.05 11.92
92.71
630.06
Stakeholders wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
YEAR WISE BUDGETING OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS UNDER ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT
COMPONENT SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA PIA WC SLNA PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC
YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
ADMINISTRATION 10.16 4.36 9.46 4.05 5.29 2.26 0.00 0.00 52.11 22.32EVALUATION 1.49 1.49 2.98 1.49 1.49 4.47 0.00MONITORING 1.49 1.49 1.49 7.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.74 1.86 2.98 0.37 9.68 27.19 0.00
DPR 0.00 0.00 7.45 0.00EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.79WORKS 74.81 6.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 418.97Production System 12.97 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.67Livelyhood 11.97 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.03CONSOLIDATION 0.74 0.74 1.49 14.90 4.47 0.74 0.74 1.49 19.36Total 1.49 2.23 13.51 104.11 2.23 0.74 13.93 27.74 1.49 0.00 8.27 6.73 10.05 11.92 92.71 630.14
SLNA 10.05DWDC 11.92PIA 92.71WC 630.06
SLNA 1.35DWDC 1.60PIA 12.45WC 84.59
DWDC
DWDC
CAPACITY BUILDING
SLNA DWDC PIA WCADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 44.06 18.89EVALUATION 1.26 1.26 3.78 0.00MONITORING 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00CAPACITY BUILDING 0.31 8.19 22.98 0.00DPR 0.00 0.00 6.29 0.00EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.18WORKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 472.23CONSOLIDATION 0.63 0.63 1.26 16.37
8.50 10.07 78.37 532.67
SLNA DWDC PIA WC
10.05 11.92
92.71
630.06
Stakeholders wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)
1.35 1.6012.45
84.59
Stakeholders wise budget (in %)
SLNADWDCPIAWC
Consolidated Sheet of Budget and Plan of Gram Panchyats of Fund at WC level
ActivityBudget (Rs in Lakhs )
Total CostALLOLI SADARA KADERA PIPLAJ GOTHRAAdmn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Monitoring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00EPA 0.04 0.06 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.30I & CB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00DPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00WORKS 0.00
57.99 85.81 220.08 6.72 29.30 17.20 417.10
Arable Land Development 42.48 67.60 161.66 4.64 22.68 14.54 313.60
11.54 13.21 31.45 1.30 4.58 1.93 64.01
Drainage Line Treatment 3.97 5 26.97 0.78 2.04 0.73 39.49
10.36 15.32 39.30 1.20 5.23 3.07 74.48
9.32 13.79 35.37 1.08 4.7 2.76 67.02
Consoldation phase 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.19
MEHRUKALAN
Natural Resource Management
Non Arable Land Development
Productivity Enhancement
Livelihood Enhancement
ADMINISTRATION Allocated budget 74.4 Lakhs
S.No PARTICULAR REMARKS
1 SALARY of WDT members 28.38 5.16 5.16 5.16 5.16 5.16 2.58
2 Salary of WC secretary 8.64 0 1.08 2.16 2.16 2.16 1.08
3 Remuneration of Volunteer 4.80 0 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.6
4 Transportation 8.20 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 two and four wheeler
5 8.50 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 for 3 offices
6 Computer with all system 0.75 0.75 0 0 0 0
7 Furniture and Dari of WC office 0.90 0 0.9 0 0 0 0
8 Miscellaneous expenses 14.31 2 3 3 3 2 1.31
74.48 9.86 14.49 14.52 14.52 13.52 7.57
Proposed amount
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
43OOO per month of four members
3000 per month of six members for 4 1/2 years
2500/- per month for maximum 4 volunteer
Overhead expenses of PIA and WC office
CAPACITY BUILDING To be organised by PIA
STAKEHOLDERS Rate Amount 1 PRIs
District level 30 20 1 1 450 9000Block Level 27 40 1 1 300 12000GP level 45 220 1 6 150 198000
2 WDT 4 4 2 3 500 120004 4 3 2 500 120004 4 1 6 150 3600
3 SHGs 380 300 1 6 150 270000300 2 3 250 450000300 3 2 300 540000
4 UG 200 200 1 5 150 150000
5 Farmers 405 780 1 1 150 117000
6 WC members 60 1 5 150 4500060 2 2 300 7200060 3 1 300 54000
7 Exposure Combined common exposure 365000SHGs 55000UG 42000WC 40000
8 Slogan writing, Display writing 115000
9 IEC 10200010 Capacity building of Individuals 55000
Total 2718600Manage by PIA 2718600Manage by DWDC 968000Manage by SLNA 37240Grand Total 3723840
Total No
Participants covered
No of Days
No of Trainings
PANEL OF RESOURCE INSTITUTIONS
S.NO Name of Institution Address Area of Expertise
1 Krishi Vighyan Kendra, Ajmer Ajmer
2 Central Spice Tabiji Pulses
3 Agriculture Research station Tabiji
4 Panchyat Training Center Ajmer grass root level training
5 Deputy Director, Veterniry department Ajmer Livestock Management , Dairy 6 ARAVALI Ajmer Livelihoods
7 Agriculture Department
8 State Institute of Agriculture Management Jaipur
9 M.R. Morarka Ajmer SHG/UG
10 Mayajan Dausa
11 BAIF Ajmer Livestock Management
12 CTAE Udaipur Soil and Water conservation 13 KAZRI
Agriculture Technology and Management
Agriculture Technology and Management
Agriculture Technology and Management
Agriculture Technology and Management
ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT - AREA ALLOCATION & BUDGET
S.No Village Gram Panchyat Area1 Sadra Sadara 716 0.12 0.862 Sadari 561 0.09 0.67
sub total(sadara) 1277 0.21 1.53
3 Alloli Alloli 863 0.14 1.044 Balapura Mehrokalan 614 0.10 0.745 Nayagaon 547 0.09 0.666 Mehrokalan 2114 0.34 2.54
3275 0.53 3.93
7 Gothra Piplaj 436 0.07 0.528 Deopura Kadera 100 0.02 0.129 Amli Gordha 105 0.02 0.13
10 Mehrukhurd 151 0.02 0.18sub total(Gordha) 256 0.04 0.31Grand total 6207 1.00 7.45
% of Total project area
Allocation of Budget(project villages )
sub total(Mehrukalan)
Allocation of Budget at Sub Committee-Watershed at Gram Panchyat LevelGram Panchyat Name of Villages EPA (4%)
Sadara Sadara, Sadari 1.53 1.30 0.05 0.06 1.15 0.04
Alloli Alloli 1.04 0.88 0.03 0.04 0.78 0.03
Mehrukalan 3.93 3.32 0.12 0.16 2.95 0.10
Piplaj Gothra 0.52 0.44 0.02 0.02 0.39 0.01
Kadera Deopura 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00
Gordha Amli, Mehrokhurd 0.31 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.01
7.45 6.30 0.22 0.30 5.59 0.19
Sanction Budget (100%)
Allocation budget to sub
committee (84.60%)
Administration (3%)
Works (75%)
Consolidation (2.60%)
Balapura, Nayagaon, Mehrukalan