+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD …

ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD …

Date post: 06-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
94
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1967 ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD AND A STUDY OFTHE RIER REACTION JOHN JOSEPH SANTOS Follow this and additional works at: hps://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation is Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation SANTOS, JOHN JOSEPH, "ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD AND A STUDY OFTHE RIER REACTION" (1967). Doctoral Dissertations. 859. hps://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/859
Transcript

University of New HampshireUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository

Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship

Spring 1967

ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: ANINVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CDAND A STUDY OFTHE RITTER REACTIONJOHN JOSEPH SANTOS

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It hasbeen accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For moreinformation, please contact [email protected].

Recommended CitationSANTOS, JOHN JOSEPH, "ALPHA-ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD AND A STUDYOFTHE RITTER REACTION" (1967). Doctoral Dissertations. 859.https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/859

This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 6 7 -1 5 ,8 0 3

SANTOS, John Joseph, 1937- 0( -ARYLISOBORNEOLS: AN INVESTIGATION OF

THE ORD AND CD AND A STUDY OF THE R ITTE R REACTION.

University of New Hampshire, Ph.D„, 1967 Chemistry, organic

University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

ct-ARYLISOBORNEOLS AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ORD AND CD

ANDA STUDY OF THE RITTER REACTION

BY

JOHN JOSEPH SANTOS

B. S., Lowell Technological Institute, I960 M. S., University of New Hampshire, 1962

A THESIS

Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of

The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Graduate School Department of Chemistry

June, 1967

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

This thesis has been examined and approved.

OitAAyC (Z.C

v Date

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author wishes to express his appreciation to the faculty and staff of the Chemistry Department of the Uni­versity of New Hampshire for their assistance and instruction during the past three years. He further wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Gloria G. Lyle for her guidance, interest and patience in this research undertaking. Sincere appreciation is also expressed to the members of his guidance committee, Dr. Alexander R. Amell, Dr. Paul R. Jones and Dr. J. John Uebel.

A special note of thanks to Mr. Ronald Panicci for the nmr spectra herein reported and to Mrs. Pearl Libby for the typing of this manuscript. The financial assistance of the University of New Hampshire is gratefully acknowledged.

This dissertation is dedicated to the parents of the author as an expression of his gratitude for their assistance and encouragement.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

TABLE OF CONTENTSPage

LIST OF TABLES . . . ............ v

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ...................... vi

I INTRODUCTION........... .......................... 1

II HISTORICAL......................................... 3

III THEORETICAL........................................ 5

IV LITERATURE DISCUSSION............................. 13

V DISCUSSION OF SYNTHESES.......................... 191. a-Aryl carbi.no Is............................ 192. Dehydration of a-Arylcarbinols............ 253. Ritter Reaction ..................... 27

VI DISCUSSION OF ORD AND CD RESULTS.................. 36

VII SECTOR RULE........................................ 54

VIII SUMMARY.............................. 57IX EXPERIMENTAL...................................... 58

BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................... 70

APPENDIX.......................................... 74

iv

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

LIST OF TABLES

Number PageI NMR Spectra....................................... 21

II ORD, CD and UV Data.............................. 43

III Optical Rotatory Dispersion Data................. 74

IV Circular Dichroism Data.......................... 76

V Concentrations of Samples for UV Spectra.......... 78

v

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Number Page

1. Spectral Curves for (+)-Camphor (IX): ORD, CDand UV............................................. 8

2. Newman Projections of threo- and erythro-2-Amino-1 ,2-diphenylethanol (VIII)........................ 17

3. Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves: (-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) and (-)-2-jo-Tolyliso- borneol (Xc)...................................... 37

4. Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves: (-)-2-jo-Anisylisoborneol (Xb) and (-)-2-£-Chloro- phenylisoborneol (Xd)............................ 38

5. Circular Dichroism Curves: (-)-2-Phenyl-isoborneol (Xa), (-)-2-jo-Anisylisoborneol (Xb),(-)-2-£-Tolylisoborneol (Xc) and (-)-2-jo- Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd)...................... 39

6. Ultraviolet Spectra: (-)-2-Phenylisoborneol(Xa) and (-)-2-jo-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd).... 41

7. Ultraviolet Spectra: (-)-2-jo-Anisylisoborneol(Xb) and (-)-2-jo-Tolylisoborneol (Xc)........... 42

8. Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves: (-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa), (-)-2-p-Anisylbornylene (Xlb) and (-)-1-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb)......... 45

9. Circular Dichroism Curves: (-)-2-Phenyl-bornylene (XIa), (-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene(Xlb) and (-)-1-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb)......... 46

10. Ultraviolet Spectra: (-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa),(-)-2-£-Anisylbornylene (Xlb) and (-) -1-jd- Anisylcamphene (Xllb)............................ 47

11. Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves: Amide XlXaand Amide XlXb.................................. . 49

12. Circular Dichroism Curves: Amide XlXa andAmide XlXb........................................ 50

13. Ultraviolet Spectrum: Amide XlXa............... 5214. Ultraviolet Spectrum: Amide XlXb............... 53

vi

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Number Page15. Sector Rule: Conformations and Orientations.... 5516. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

Phenylisoborneol (Xa)............................ 7917. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

jo-Anisylisoborneol (Xb).......................... 7918. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

jo-Tolylisoborneol (Xc)........................... 8019. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

jo-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd).................... 8020. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

Phenylbornylene (XIa)............................ 8121. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: (-)-2-

£-Anisylbornylene (Xlb).......................... 8122. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: Acetate

XVIIIa............................................. 8223. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: Alcohol

XXa................................................ 8224. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: Amide

XlXb.......... 8325. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: Alcohol

XXb................................................ 8326. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum: Amide

XlXa. . . ........................................... 84

vii

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

INTRODUCTION

The majority of the investigations in the area of optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) and circular dichroism (CD) have been carried out on molecules which possess a carbonyl chromophore in the vicinity of an asymmetric center. In recent years, investigators have begun to study other chromophores and, in particular, the phenyl chromo­phore. The early studies made of the phenyl chromophore when attached to an asymmetric center provided conflicting evidence as to whether or not the phenyl chromophore is anisotropic. Some investigators via theoretical calcula­tions concluded that the phenyl chromophore is anisotropic and, therefore, should produce a Cotton effect. The de­velopment of the instrumentation for ORD which occurred in the 1950’s provided the tool by which chemists could experi­mentally examine the phenyl chromophore. Conflicting evidence still resulted since some investigators could obtain a Cotton effect while others could not. The difficulty encountered with ORD measurements was that many compounds exhibit back­ground rotations which tend to obscure small Cotton effects.

In the early 1960’s, the availability of instruments to measure CD provided a means of a possible solution to the question. CD measurements express more specifically than ORD the asymmetry in the immediate vicinity of the chromo­phore. Compounds containing a phenyl chromophore which had previously been considered not to be anisotropic were now shown via CD measurements to exhibit Cotton effects and therefore to be anisotropic.

- 1-

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

2

Since it has been shown that the aromatic ring is optically anisotropic and gives rise to Cotton effects in an accessible region of the ultraviolet, it appears that some interesting information might be derived from a sys­tematic study of the effect on the ORD and CD of varying the substituents on the phenyl chromophore. It is well established that substituents of varying electronic donating power produce various changes in the ultraviolet (UV) ab­sorption of the phenyl chromophore. Since ORD, CD and UV have been shown to be related both by physical measurements as well as theoretical considerations, the question may be asked: will the effect noted in the UV be the same and ofequal magnitude in the ORD and CD?

The investigation reported herein has a dual purpose. The first purpose was to observe the effect on the ORD and CD (a) of varying the para-substituent on the phenyl chromo­phore in the a-arylcarbinols and corresponding amides and (b) of comparing the products obtained from the dehydration of the a-arylcarbinols. The second purpose involved the in­vestigation of the course of the reactions and their stereo­chemical consequences, especially in the case of the prepara­tion of the amides in which the Ritter reaction was employed. Since the absolute configuration of the a-arylcarbinols was known, an attempt was made to devise a sector rule which would conform to the experimental results obtained and which would lead to the prediction as to the conformation of the a-aryl­carbinols .

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

HISTORICAL

The basis of modern stereochemistry was laid by the1fundamental work of Pasteur, Biot and Fresnel. The phen­

omenon of changes in optical activity with the wavelength of a beam of polarized light was first discovered in 1817 by Biot.'*' It was reported by Biot and Fresnel, working indepen­dently, that the rotatory power of an optically active sub­stance increases with the decreasing wavelength of the inci-

2dent light. The change in optical rotation with change in wavelength of the incident light is termed optical rotatory dispersion (ORD). Optical rotation measurements in the suc­ceeding fifty years were taken at several wavelengths. How­ever, with the invention of the Bunsen burner in 1866, rota­tory dispersion studies were inhibited as far as its develop­ment and use were concerned in organic chemistry since the Bunsen flame produces a convenient and nearly monochromatic source of light. Organic chemists, therefore, reported rotations only at the sodium D-line of 589 inp and this was the deterring fact in almost all measurements in the next thirty years. The development of ORD was due largely, therefore, to physical chemists and, in particular, to Professor T. M.Lowry.̂

The discovery of the phenomenon of circular dichroism (CD) came approximately thirty years after the discovery of ORD. Haidinger was the first to note the difference in the absorption of the two circular components of plane polarized light which is termed circular dichroism.

Early attempts to apply CD and ORD techniques for the solution of stereochemical problems in organic chemistry were

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

4

hindered by technical difficulties. It has only been in the last twelve years that ORD studies have made significant advancement in the field of organic chemistry. It was at this time that automatic recording spectropolarimeters were introduced.^ In 1960 an impetus occurred in the area of CD due to the development of more flexible instruments. In the wake of these developments in instrumentation, there have followed numerous applications of CD and ORD techniques for the solution of structural, conformational and configura­tional problems in organic chemistry.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

5

THEORETICAL

There exist three types of polarized light: plane or linear, circular and elliptical. The electric vector of plane polarized light oscillates in one plane in a sinusoidal manner. Circularly polarized light has a rotating electric vector of constant magnitude. A circle is obtained if the tip of the electric vector of circularly polarized light is projected onto a plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Elliptically polarized light will produce an ellipse if the tip of its electric vector is projected onto a plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation.

Plane polarized light is assumed to be composed of two components, a right circularly polarized component and a left circularly polarized component of equal magnitude.If plane polarized light passes through a material that is not optically active, the velocities of transmission of the two components are equally retarded and the observed rotation of the plane of the emergent polarized light is zero. However, when plane polarized light passes through a substance which is optically active, the indices of refraction for the left and right circularly polarized components are different which results in the velocity of transmission of the two components being unequally retarded. Subsequently, the plane of polari­zation of the emergent light will be rotated due to the phase difference resulting from the recombination of the right and left circularly polarized components. Unequal velocity of transmission of the right and left circularly polarized com­ponents of plane polarized light is referred to as optical rotation. The variation of optical rotation with wavelength

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

6

gives an optical rotatory dispersion curve.If an optically active material contains a chromophore

which absorbs light in the region of the visible or ultra­violet being investigated, an additional phenomenon is observed; that is, in addition to unequal transmission of the two cir­cular components of plane polarized light, unequal absorption of these two components will occur. This unequal absorption results in a change in the magnitude of one circular component relative to the other and the optically active material is said to exhibit circular dichroism. The plane of polarization of the light emerging from the optically active material will be rotated but the emergent light will also be elliptically polarized.

The Cotton effect^ is a phenomenon observed as a result of the combination of unequal absorption (circular dichroism) and unequal velocity of transmission (optical rotation) of left and right circularly polarized light. Abnormal behavior of the rotation of an optically active material is most fre­quently observed in the spectral region of optically active absorption bands. In the case of an ORD curve, the charac­teristics of the Cotton effect are that the rotation gradually reaches a peak or trough, then rapidly decreases or increases until it reaches a corresponding trough or peak and gradually increases or decreases again as measurement of rotation is made further into the ultraviolet (Fig. 1). If the peak occurs prior to the trough as one proceeds from higher wavelength to lower wavelength, the curve is designated as a positive Cotton effect and a negative Cotton effect if the trough occurs prior to the peak as one proceeds from higher to lower wavelength.ORD curves which do not exhibit Cotton effects in the presently measureable region of the ultraviolet are classified as plain curves.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

7

If an optically active material has a small rotationassociated with a strong absorption, it may be very difficult or even impossible to make rotatory dispersion measurements through the absorption band due to insufficient light trans­mission. However, it may be possible to obtain the circular dichroism curve since much smaller concentrations of the optically active material may be employed therefore allowing for greater light transmission. Figure 1 illustrates a cir­cular dichroism curve which is a plot of the wavelength de­pendence on difference in absorption of the two circular components of polarized light. In contrast to the ORD curve, the CD curve should have a true Gaussian form and give only zero ellipticity at wavelengths outside the absorption band. Theoretical relationships exist between rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism which permit the calculation of one curve from the other.^

the rotational strength (R) is a measure of the intensity of the CD curve and also gauges in sign and magnitude the extent to which a particular electronic transition contributes to the rotatory dispersion. This constant may be calculated from the observed molar ellipticity of a compound from the following equation:

Moffitt and Moscowitz showed that a constant called

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

200_]__300 400

Wavelength, mji

Figure 1

Spectral Curves for (+)-Camphor (IX) in Methanol ORD (— ), CD (---) and UV (..... )

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

9

K = Kth electronic transition

= rotational strength of the Kth transition

h = Plank's constant

c = velocity of light in a vacuum

= Number of absorbing molecules per ml

0 (7\) = partial ellipticity of the Kth transition K “A '= wavelength

A much more complex equation has been derived for a similar relationship of R^ with the partial molecular rotation of the Kth transition. The values for this equation are de­pendent upon the half-band width of the ellipticity curve. At some distance from the absorption maximum, however, the ORD curve becomes dependent only on the fact that an electronic transition occurred but not on the specific band width. The curve reduces, therefore, to a relatively simple expression:

Further examination of this equation reveals its identity with the classical Drude equation:

l

where A. and A. are the rotational and dispersion constants I Xrespectively which may be derived from the ORD data.

[<t> ] = the partial molar rotation of the Kth transi­tion at wavelength A.

A° = wavelength of the Kth electronic transition

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

10

Of importance to this study is the measurement of the molecular ellipticity [0] which reflects the differencein absorption of left and right circularly polarized light.

[0] = 2.303 (eL - eR)

[0] = 3305 (el - eR)

[0] = 3305 Ae

[0] = molecular ellipticity

(e^ - e^) = Ae = difference in absorbance of leftand right circularly polarized light and includes the data of the actual measurement (concen­tration, path length and molecu­lar weight)

When the chromophoric group is the carbonyl group, the relationship between the amplitude (a) of the Cotton effect measured by ORD and the ellipticity of the Cotton effect obtained by CD may be expressed:

a = 40.28 Ae = 0.0122 [0]

[ W 1 - [^2- 100

where [$]- and [<t>] 0 are the molecular rotations of the first1 2 g(longer wavelength) and second extrema of the Cotton effect.

Since the phenyl chromophore has a total of six p orbitals, six MO’s are possible. The ground state for benzene has two electrons in each of the three orbitals ^ 2 3n<̂

and transitions to the higher orbitals give rise to three bands in the UV region of the spectrum at 180 m^, 200 inp and 256 inp of which the first two are of high intensity and the third of low intensity (forbidden transition owing to the symmetry of the benzene molecule).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

11

Orbitals States

These bands can be considered as arising from transi-1 1 1 1 tions between the states designated A, L , L, and B. The

1 ? . transition at 256 rnp is denoted by A and this is thetransition that is being observed in the ORD and CD studyconducted herein since the instrumental approach undertaken

1 1does not allow for measurement of the high intensity L A1 1(200 mp) and B <— A (180 mp) transitions, both of which

should also be optically anisotropic.Substitution in benzene does not usually produce great

changes or new bands in the spectrum but merely modifies the spectrum of benzene, an effect known as perturbation. The spectrum of benzene is said to be perturbed by the introduction of substituents; the greater the resonance interaction of the substituent with the aromatic ring, the greater the perturbation. Atoms with lone pairs of electrons can donate these to the ring and this delocalization shifts the 256 mp band to longer wave­length. The easier the removal of the electron from the sub­stituent, the greater is the shift in the spectrum. Solvent has a decided effect on the UV spectrum of benzene. The more polar the solvent, the greater is the tendency for the spectrum

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

12

to show broad peaks that merge into one another. A further consequence is that the B-band of the aromatic ring under­goes a hypsochromic shift with increasing polarity of solvent. In the current investigation a single solvent, methanol, was employed because of the solubility of all the compounds under investigation. Although a less polar solvent would permit the observation of more fine structure, the overall shapes of the curves provided sufficient data for this investigation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

13

LITERATURE DISCUSSION

For the past fifteen years, the study of optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) has been concerned with the car­bonyl chromophore in the vicinity of an asymmetric center. These studies have resulted in many correlations of structure and conformation with optical activity and these correlations have assisted organic chemists in the elucidation of the structures of many natural products. Djerassi may be con­sidered the pioneer in this area because of the extensive work he and his co-workers have carried out in the steroid field. From the enormous amount of data accumulated, Moffitt et al. were able to develop the Octant Rule for optically active compounds containing a cyclohexanone ring system. The rule relates the sign of the Cotton effect to the spatial orientation of atoms about the carbonyl function. Thus, if the absolute configuration is known, the conformation can be determined or if the conformation is established, the absolute configuration can be assigned.

Due to the tremendous strides made in the ORD investi­gations of optically active ketones, increasing attention has been given to optically active compounds possessing other chromophores. This thesis deals with the ORD and CD investi­gation of the aromatic ring as a chromophoric group. There has appeared in the literature conflicting evidence as to thebehavior of the phenyl chromophore when attached to an asym-

11metric carbon atom. Kuhn and Biller undertook an ORD inves­tigation of methylphenylcarbinol (I) from which they concluded that the 260 mjj absorption band of the benzene ring in this

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

14

12compound is not optically active. Verbit utilizing both

R' I R-H, R'-OH, RM-CHQI J

R ” C “ R II R=E, R ' -OH, R"=C02H

h i r=c h 3 , r >=o h , r "=c o 2h

IV R-H, R'=CH3 , Rm-C02H

ORD and CD measurements showed that the benzene chromophorein I is optically active. ORD studies on mandelic acid (II),atrolactic acid (III) and some of their derivatives indicatedanomalous rotatory dispersion in the region of phenyl absorp-

11 13tion. Sjoberg has conducted ORD studies on hydratropicacid (IV). The curve was characterized by the rotationrapidly increasing toward the region of phenyl absorption andin this manner resembles the curve obtained by Kuhn andBiller'*''*' for II. At about 270 mju a peak was found in the ORDcurve of IV; however, Sjbberg concluded that this anomaly maynot be real since it appeared close to the limiting range ofthe instrument.

1 /Lyle has reported evidence that suggests that even if the phenyl chromophore alone is not optically active (no definite evidence that it is not), a combination of the phenyl chromophore and an electronegative group such as an amino or a hydroxyl group properly located in the molecule is optically active giving rise to small but well defined Cotton effects. Lyle and Santos'*"'* showed that phenylalanine (V) has a low intensity Cotton effect that could only be ascribed to the anisotropy of the aromatic ring.

COOH V R-H

H 2N ? H— v VI R-OHCH2-<0 >'R

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

15

An investigation by Hooker and Tanford , however,of the ORD of V indicated the absence of a Cotton effect inthe aromatic absorption region while a prominent Cottoneffect was observed for L-tyrosine (VI) which is associatedwith the aromatic absorption band near 280 inp. Moscowitz ejt

17al. verified the existence of an extremely weak aromatic Cotton effect for both II and V.

in addition to the phenyl group other chromophores whichpossess ultraviolet absorption not far removed from that of

12the phenyl group. Verbit measured the ORD of 2-phenylbutane (VII) in order to observe the behavior of the phenyl chromo­phore unperturbed by other chromophores. At approximately 260 mp a low intensity Cotton effect was observed.

view of the conflicting evidence thus far stated. One factor is that of conformation. In open chain systems, as thus far discussed, there is a lack of conformational homogeneity.For cyclic systems, the conformational dependence of the Cotton effect has been well established. Secondly, the inten­sity of the Cotton effect is dependent upon the environment in

18which the phenyl group is located. Moscowitz et, al^ have stated that theoretically a symmetric chromophore in a dis­symmetric environment is capable of exhibiting anomalous rota­tory dispersion. However, for the monosubstituted phenyl

All of the compounds mentioned thus far have contained

H - C - CH.3

VII

A few factors should be considered at this point in

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

16

chromophore, its absorption band at approximately 260 mju is of low intensity ( e ̂ >250) and therefore corresponds to a low energy ^ ^ * transition. Since the state has the same electronic symmetry as the ground state, this transition is forbidden and thus a weak one. In order to enhance the Cotton effect of the phenyl chromophore a source of non­bonding orbitals for the n - transition is needed and inmany of the compounds discussed above the oxygen atom of the hydroxyl group is the source. In the case of compound VII no such source is available and the observed Cotton effect is very weak.

19Lyle and Lacroix in their investigation of the ORD °f threo- and erythro-2-amino-l,2-diphenylethanol (VIII) illustrated the effect of conformation on the intensity of the Cotton effect. Threo-VIII gave a Cotton effect curve with relatively large rotations at the first extremum whereas erythro-VIII produced a plain curve.

H9N - C - H z I H - C - OH

threo-VIII erythro-VIII

In the case of threo-VIII a preferred conformation ispossible in which the amino and hydroxyl groups are in afavorable position for hydrogen bonding (Fig. 2), and thisconformation should be the more favored one because of the

20stability factor of hydrogen bond formation. If hydrogen bond formation exists in erythro-VIII an unfavorable conforma­tion results in which the two phenyl groups are eclipsed

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

17

(Fig. 2).

HOOH

C6

threo-VIII erythro-VIII

Figure 2

In this case several rotamers will exist in solution. This phenomenon is, therefore, illustrated in the Cotton effect observed for the former and the absence of an observable Cotton effect for the latter.

A factor which needs clarification at this point is in the distinction of the observability of the Cotton effect of the phenyl chromophore by ORD and the strength of the Cotton effect. With ORD measurements there exists in instances where other chromophores are present the possibility of a background curve which if it is steeply rising or falling will obscure the weak Cotton effect of the phenyl chromophore.In order to avoid this background signal the Cotton effect can best be detected by measurement of the CD.

All of the compounds mentioned herein have contained no aromatic substituents except for L-tyrosine (VI). It appears evident, therefore, that the effect of a consistent pattern of aromatic substituents on the anisotropy of the phenyl chromophore should be considered with respect to the ORD and CD. A large number of polysubstituted aromatic com­pounds have been examined by both ORD and CD including alkaloids,

21steroids and ligins. These compounds have the aromatic ring

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

18

locked in a polycyclic ring system. It should be possible to use the results of the optical activity studies for the confirmation of the stereochemistry of the products of the chemical reactions carried out on the monoterpenes described in this dissertation. The rigidity of the molecule should lead to a predictable conformity of experimentally observed Cotton effects in similar molecules. The success of this approach would permit the development of a sector rule for the aromatic chromophore.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

19

DISCUSSION OF SYNTHESES

g-Arylcarbinols

The terpene family possessing the bornane skeleton was selected as the aliphatic portion of the compounds in­vestigated. This selection was made due to the well estab­lished stereochemistry and the rigid ring system of this member of the terpenes. The a-arylcarbinols listed below were synthesized employing (+)-camphor (IX) as the original starting material.

(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa)

(-)-2-£-Anisylisoborneol (Xb)

(-)-2-g-Tolylisoborneol (Xc)

(-)-2-£-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd)

IX\

X Ar

a : Ar = C6H5-b: Ar = £-CH3OC6H

c : Ar = £-CH3C6H4

d: Ar = £-cic6h4-

The Grignard reaction of £-bromoanisole and racemic22 23camphor in ether has been reported ’ but only low yields

(5-10%) of the alcohol were obtained even after twenty-four24hours reaction time. Erman and Flautt employing tetra-

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

20

hydrofuran as solvent were able to isolate the alcohol in26-30% yields after two hours reaction time; however, largequantities of camphor were recovered from the reaction probably

25due to formation of a stable carbonyl-Grignard complex or to26enolization of the keto group. This reaction as reported

results in the substitution of the jo-anisyl group at the endo-position and the hydroxyl group at the exo-position afterhydrolysis of the complex. This assignment is made by analogyto the known stereochemistry of Grignard addition to ketones

27 28from the least hindered side. ’In this investigation (+)-camphor (IX), the non-

aromatic material, was converted to arylisoborneols via the reaction of the appropriate aryl Grignard reagents. The aryl Grignard reagents that were prepared covered a range of elec­tronic density by varying the para-substituent of the aromatic compound (methoxyl, methyl, hydrogen and chlorine). After laboriously freeing all the isoborneols from contaminants, the prime one being camphor, Xa and Xc were isolated as liquids and Xb and Xd as solids. The structures Xa-d were confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) spectral data (Table I): the aromatic protons appeared at t 2 .7-2 .9, the hydroxyl proton at approximately r 8.0 and three singlets (3H each) for the methyl groups at t 8.78, 9.11 and 9018 +0.05. These assignments agree with those reported for racemic 2-jo-anisyl- isoborneol.̂

An attempt was made to prepare 2-(a,a,a-trifluoro)- tolylisoborneol (Xe) via reaction of the corresponding aryl Grignard reagent with (+)-camphor. The anticipated aryliso- borneol Xe was not isolated. The white crystalline material that was isolated was identified as di-(a,a,a-trifluoro)tolyl. A' high melting, dark red material whose infrared spectrum indicated the absence of hydroxyl and aromatic bands was

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

21

OCO •H o *—I CM o O'! o oa) 4-J ■ • • • • • •d CO in r~- co vO < f o<C P i \—I i—1 CM

< f -s-u u CJ

M + + +CO ■wcu d cu cu cn CU

PM cu d d i—i r-4 d PS «—i ds 0) >-> CU cu x X cu CU u X cud 3 d ^ l—1 I“M I—( \— d X I—1 i—1 t—4 l—1 d 1 X r - i r - i 1—1o b£ cu o X X X X CU O o X x X X cu 1-t o X+j • r i N u d d s i d N d d X ! N X d -Oj rd do cn d T l 4J 4J 4-3 4-3 d 4-3 ro 4-1 4-3 4-1 4-3 d r - i "O •P U 4-3u CO cu X CU CU CU CU CU CU X CU CU cu cu CU O X 0) (D CU

PM < pq PS s S S S pq H PS s s s

dl£HI 4J

•H *r4 4-3 O *Hd >h S dl

g cn S cn cn cn c t» in £ » a t» o * cn cn El cn cn

4-3MM•r4d cu

CO cn dd d m O CM

M 4-3O

i—i CO

CO>

o O•

o•

a) CU o av ay CTli—i a •r4 i i 1d co s 00 CO <± CM Os i—1 r - i \— 1 a \ m o m O O oo o a \ COCO

p icu VO d 00 i—! t—1 O'* CM <t* h * H i—i CO r - i O n 1— 1

H d • e • • • • • • • • • • • « a ■ • •o CM 00 f'' 00 O'x CF\ CM vO CO r~- 00 OV CTv CM r^- oo r" . 00 CT\

dX ! o

CO '—' X !X !

i-4o t—1

C0| T--1 CU oTO o d CUd cu d dd d O do d d < f o M fa o r - i o 1—1 d !--1s 1 d a cn u o uo o O VO •H O r-> cn O 00

<t> cn i—i i—i 1—1 •r4 !—1•H 4-3 X 4-3 i—1 4-3i—1 d cu cn d cu X . d cuX CU d •i—4 cu d 4—1 CU dd > d d > d o > dcu d bO < r d bO H i—1 bO

d O d i O d i O -dPM1 co Pm p ii co Pm pM■ CO Pm

CM1

CM1

CMI

/~*X1X-N

l✓—x

■IV

1N—'

•V -/

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

9.18

s Me

thyl

22

oCO *r4 O CMCU 44 • •54 co < f - r->

C Pi i—i

u

+CO 44cu d cu

P h CU d r - 1

I -u •r4 *r4 44 O 1-4 -i4 3 r-lS Of

O On • •

in o

on r-~ • •

o c n

c n

a\cm o

<f r4CM O 00

cn h cno

On

01d a)i—I i—I di n CUX ^ 4 i—I 1-4 l—I i—IO i—l ^ - i ^ n ^ - i4d <J xs xi x i xi44 I 44 44 44 44a ) -ct-cu cu a ) a)S o S g S g

c r 6 cn co cn cn g x ) £ g cn cn cn cr'TJ co £ £ cn cn co

g cu cu Cn cu in cu cud 2 d r—J Cx! i—l i—i i—1 d r-4 i—1|—{ i—1r-4 do b£ cu in O in Cn Cn CU1—1 r-4 Cn ►>"1 cu r-44J •r4 N ,d U 43 4d Xi N in < rd d d! xi N ino cn d 44 X) 44 44 44 d d 1 44 4-J 44 44 d dS4 cn CU CU cu CU CU cu •r4 cu CD CU cu cu •HCM <J PQ S id S S S CO > O S S s a CQ >

444-4•r4rd CU

r-N CO 3CM T—1 CMN -/ r-4 CO o

CO > •H O o n

• H |r» 1CU e O 00

r-4 CU m c n-O -3 • •co U cm r - .E-4

cna .oLOc n

mo o

oo n̂ i o m rs o n ch cn00 O ID CTi O i o CM

cna .a

m

c n

o

i s [v . oo ch o \

oo•n i< t o i n i n i—i o n - O i—I CM vo on On i—I i—i

cn M" iO in oo on on

toX)d3o

Eioo

TtX

o /-ncu rQd r— N H54 CO Xo H N_/rQ r<!O v—/ (Ucn d

•r4 cu cui—1 d i— iin cu ind i—i d M fCU i—1 in u i—1

jd CJ d o ua, o on 54 O rO O 1-4o i—I O CM r—1 CMd 44 rO 44o d cu r-4 CU d cu

t—1 CU 54 in 54 •H <U 54rd > 3 d 44 3 a > 3o r-l bO cu CO bO < r4 bOi O -r4 xi CU t 4 i O -r4o f1

CO PtH P41 13 Pn p 4■ CO P=4

CM1 CM1 CMi1 < n

R

i1

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Reproduced

with perm

ission of the

copyright ow

ner. Further

reproduction prohibited

without

permission.

______________Compound—

Acetate XVIIIaSolvent CCloD Figure 22

Alcohol XXaj

Solvent CC1„D Figure 23

Amide XlXb

Solvent CCl-D Figure 24

Table I (3)

Chemical Shift t Value

Multi- , plicity—

Proton Peak As s ignment

AreaRatio

2.66 m Benzene 5.05 •14 / n q Proton on CJ^=4.0 cps

J2=7.0 cpshav ingAcetyl Group

1.0

7.74-8.89 m Methylene, C, + Benzyl Acetyl-CHn7.99 s 18.3

9.09 s Methyl9.18 s Methyl9.29 s Methyl2.65 m Benzene 5.06.23 q Proton on C

J,=3.75 cps 32=7.00 cps

havingHydroxyl Group

1.0

7.43-8.95 m Methylene, C^ + Benzyl

8.00 s Hydroxyl 16.59.00 s Methyl9.12 s Methyl9.29 s Methyl2.90 q Benzene 4.04.33 m Amide proton 0.76.19 m Methoxyl +

Proton on C having Amide 4.0

7.80-8.89 m Methylene + C^8.00 s Acetyl-CHo 18.49.08 s Methyl9.25 2s Methyl

Table I (4)

Chemical Shift Multi- , Proton Peak AreaCompound— t Value plicity— As s ignment Rati<

Alcohol XXb 2.98 q Benzene 4.06.30 m Methoxyl + 4.0

Solvent CC1, Proton on CFigure 25 having Hydroxyl

7.74-8.92 m Methylene,if C, + Benzyl 7.5

8.22 s Hydroxyl, 9.08 s Methyl

9.19 s Methyl 9.09.34 s Methyl

Amide XlXa 2.66 m Benzene 5.04.05 m Amide proton 0.9

Solvent CCloD 5.90 q Proton on CFigure 26 having Amide 0.9

7.70-8.90 m Methylene,C, + Benzyl ~

8.00 s Acetyl-CHo 18.29.08 s Methyl9.24 s Methyl9.28 s Methyl

Qt" The samples were run using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard.— s = singlet, d = doublet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, 2s = two single peaks superimposed.

25

isolated but it was not further identified.

V

CRXe

Dehydration of g-Arlycarbinols

In order to observe the effect of the styrene chromo-phore on the ORD and CD, dehydration of the arylisoborneolsXa and Xb was attempted. Dehydration of the phenylcarbinol

24Xa was easily achieved with boron trifluoride etherate to yield (-)-2-phenylbornylene (XIa). However, the elimination of water in the case of Xa also resulted in facile rearrange­ment to the camphene system producing 1-phenylcamphene (Xlla). Thus Xa was converted to a mixture of XIa (vinyl proton doublet at t 4.06) and Xlla (methylene protons, 2 singlets at t 5.43 and 5.78). Attempts to separate the bornylene derivative XIa from the camphene derivative Xlla via fractional distillation failed. Although a possible separation could be achieved by tedious preparative gas chromatography (GLPC), a selective reduction of the exocyclic double bond in Xlla wasaccomplished via hydroboration of the mixture followed by hy-

29drolysis with propionic acid. Vacuum distillation afforded a 61.6% yield of (-)-2-phenylbornylene (XIa) whose structure was confirmed by the nmr spectrum, vinyl proton doublet at t 4.05 (Table I) with no evidence of contamination by Xlla.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

26

OH

PhH,2 Ph‘Ph

Xa XIa Xlla

Dehydration of the anisylcarbinol Xb with boron tri~fluoride etherate resulted in the formation of (-)-2-|>-anisyl-bornylene (Xlb) as the only isolated product, nmr: vinylproton doublet at t 4.10 (Table I) which was in agreement

24with the nmr data reported by Erman and Flautt for the racemic compound. In order to achieve dehydration of Xb followed by rearrangement to the camphene skeleton, it was necessary to use more vigorous conditions. Treatment of Xb with 6n sulfuric acid followed by heating at reflux resulted in the formation of (-)-1-jo-anisylcamphene (Xllb), nmr: methylene protons, 2 singlets at t 5.45 and 5.80. However, Xllb could not be isolated free of contamination of a small amount of Xlb.

H„S04

\

'An

BF

AnAn

Xllb Xb Xlb

An = p-CHo0CJH ”3 6 4

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Ritter Reaction30 31Ritter ej: a_l. s have reported that the interaction

of alkenes or tertiary alcohols with nitriles in the presence of concentrated sulfuric acid results after hydrolysis with water in the formation of amides. A specific example cited was the reaction of camphene (XIII) with hydrogen cyanide, acetonitrile, benzonitrile or phenylacetonitrile in the presence of concentrated sulfuric acid to produce the cor­responding N-isobornyl amides. In these reactions, the cam­phene ring system has undergone rearrangement to the bornane skeleton with the ultimate substitution of the amide function at the exo-position. In a subsequent patent application, Ritter stated that the reaction of camphene (XIII), aceto­nitrile and concentrated sulfuric acid in glacial acetic acidas solvent produced 70% of N-isobornyl acetamide (XIV) and

32 33 34some isobornyl acetate (XV). A reinvestigation 5 of theRitter reaction of camphene with hydrogen cyanide and con­centrated sulfuric acid indicated that rearrangement from the camphene ring system to the bornane system did not occur under these conditions since the product isolated was identified as 3-formamidoisocamphane (XVI).

NHAc

(+)-XIII XIV XV

:c ho

XVI

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

28

Eastman and Noller reported, however, that camphenehas the tendency under acidic conditions to rearrange toproduce ultimately the isobornyl system. Roberts and

3 6Maskaleris reported that the reaction of camphene with alkyl-nitriles in the presence of concentrated sulfuric acid producedonly the isobornyl amides rather than the unrearranged amides.Erman has indicated that in his investigations of campheneunder acidic conditions the reacting species attaches itselfto the rearranged camphene skeleton at the exo-position when

37the reaction temperature is at room temperature or below. He also indicated that as the reaction temperature was raised above room temperature, the yield of the isobornyl product decreased while the yield of bornyl product increased.

If the mechanism of this reaction is considered with respect to classical carbonium ion chemistry, it is noted that rearrangement apparently occurs from a tertiary carbonium ion in the camphane skeleton X H I a to a secondary carbonium ion X H I b in the bornane system.

\X H I aXIII ' \

■CH.

XIIIc X H I b \\OHAcHN

>

XIVX H I d

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

29

A more plausible mechanism might be suggested via anon-classical carbonium ion in which the tertiary carbonium ion X H I a after rearrangement to the bornane system X H I e might exist as the non-classical carbonium ion Xlllf which may be of greater stability than the secondary carbonium ion Xlllb. A 2,6-hydride shift would lead to a non-classical car­bonium ion X H I g which is enantiomeric with the carbonium ion Xlllf. Subsequent attack of acetonitrile followed by hydroly­sis would produce two enantiomeric amides XIV and racemization is therefore possible for the optically active camphene em­ployed as the starting material.

\ X H I e 'X H I a

2 ,6-hydride

X H I g Xlllf \\CH3CN

■NHAc

XIV

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

30

A study of the Ritter reaction was conducted as part of this investigation in order to synthesize N-(2-phenyl)- isobornyl acetamide (XVIIa) and N-(2-p-anisyl)isobornyl acetamide (XVIIb). The iso-nomenclature specifies that the amide function is exo while the aryl group is endo.

■NHAc

ArXVII

a: Ar = ChH,--o 5

The phenylcarbinol Xa was subjected to the conditions of the Ritter reaction employing glacial acetic acid as solvent. The crystalline product XVIIIa isolated was identi­fied as an acetate via the infrared spectrum. The nmr spec­trum (Table I) of the acetate XVIIIa had a quartet at t 5.14 which integrated for one proton. These data indicated that the acetyl group was attached to a carbon atom bearing aproton which was split by two adjacent, non-equivalent protons.

38In an attempt to eliminate acetate formation , the phenyl­carbinol Xa was again subjected to the conditions of the Ritter reaction employing an excess of acetonitrile as the solvent.An amide XlXa was isolated as the product with no attending acetate formation. The nmr spectrum (Table I) of this amide XlXa also showed a quartet at ^ 5 . 8 6 which integrated for one proton. These data indicated, therefore, that the anticipated amide XVIIa was not obtained since no quartet would be observable if the amide function were attached to the same carbon atom bearing the phenyl group.

In order to characterize the products of the Ritter reaction, the acetate XVIIIa was treated with lithium aluminum hydride. The crystalline alcohol XXa isolated was not identical

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

31

with the original alcohol Xa. The nmr spectrum of the alcohol XXa also indicated a quartet at t 6.23 which integrated for one proton.

OH'Ar

XAr

XI

AcetateXVIII

V Ritter Rx + Amide

XIX

Ar C6«5b: Ar =

\KAlcohol

XXThe arylcarbinol Xb, the bornylene derivative Xlb

and the camphene derivative Xllb were subjected to the con­ditions of the Ritter reaction employing glacial acetic acid as solvent. In all three cases the same amide XlXb was isolated which also was not the expected amide XVIIb since the nmr spectrum (Table I) indicated a multiplet at t 5.92 which integrated for four protons. Three of these protons are accounted for by the methoxyl group appearing at t 6.19 while the remaining proton is probably on the carbon atom bearing the amide function. This multiplet appears to be a quartet and, therefore, the proton involved must be split by two adjacent non-equivalent protons. Acetate formation was observed as a by-product in the Ritter reaction on compounds Xb and Xlb. The acetate XVIIIb was isolated as an oil which was then treated without prior purification with lithium aluminum hydride. The alcohol XXb obtained was not identical to the original alcohol Xb. The nmr spectrum of the alcohol XXb indicated a multiplet at t 6.30 which integrated for four

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

32

protons. Three of these protons are accounted for by the methoxyl group while the remaining proton is on the carbon atom bearing the hydroxyl group.

the amides XlXa and b and the alcohols XXa and b, it appears that a more complex mechanism than that previously considered for the Ritter reaction must be involved, that is to say, that the following mechanism does not appear to be operable.

to give ultimately the same tertiary carbonium ion XXIb since the tertiary carbonium ion XXIa derived from protonation of XII would be expected to undergo rearrangement to the tertiary carbonium ion XXIb which can be stabilized by interaction with the aryl group. The amide XVII would then arise from attack by the acetonitrile at the exo-position followed by hydrolysis. Since the nmr data do not substantiate the structure for XVII, it would appear that the steric conditions existing between the bridge methyls and the aryl group prohibit attack at the exo-position by the acetonitrile.

From the nmr data obtained for the acetate XVIIIa

NHAc'‘Ar 3

XVII XXIb XXIa

The three compounds X, XI and XII would be expected

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

33

Consideration of the nmr data permits the assumption of three possible structures XXIIa-c.

‘H

ArU''

c\

Z - OAc, NHAc and OH

XXII 24Erman and Flautt have reported the preparation of

compounds XXIIa and XXIIb where Z = OH and Ar = jo-CH^OCgH^. Comparison of the coupling constants obtained in this investi­gation with those reported by Erman and Flautt would indicate that XXIIb is not a suitable structure. A possible mechanism for the formation of XXIIa is postulated.

XXIb

The tertiary carbonium ion XXIb is the initially formed carbonium ion in all the mechanisms to be considered. Since attack by Z at the exo-position appears to be unlikely, this mechanism may occur via a 2 ,3-hydride shift of the endo hydrogen with the resulting formation of the secondary

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

34

carbonium ion XXIc. Subsequent attack at the endo-positionby Z would result in the formation of XXIIa. Attack at theendo-position by Z is postulated due to the steric interferencethat might result from the exo-aryl group and the bridge methylif attack by Z were to occur at the exo-position.

The structure XXIIc which is also consistent with the39nmr data arises if a 2 ,6-hydride shift is. considered.

‘Ar

->H

XXIb XXId XXIIc

The hydrogen on in XXIb that is in the more favor­able position to migrate is the endo-H and it would be expected to attach itself to C2 at the endo-position, thereby placing the aryl group in the exo-position resulting in the formationof the secondary carbonium ion XXId. Subsequent attack by Z

39bwould result in Z on in the exo-position.With respect to the nmr data reported for 2-exo-p-

24anisylepiborneol (Xlla: Ar^jo-CH^OCgH^ and Z=OH) the C2 -benzyl proton is observed as a doublet sufficiently downfieldso that it is not obscured by the methylene and C^-protons.In the case of the nmr spectra obtained for the alcohols XXa-b,the doublet if it exists is obscured by the methylene and C.-

24protons. Also the quartet reported in the literature appears further downfield than that obtained experimentally. However, if XXIIc is the structure for the products of the Ritter reac­tion, the C2 -benzyl proton should appear as a quartet since it is split in this structure by the two adjacent non-equivalent

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

35

protons on • However, this distinction cannot be made due to its being obscured by the methylene and protons.

From consideration of the evidence in the literature and that obtained experimentally, it appears that the more likely structure for the products of the Ritter reaction would be structure XXIIc. However, further experimental evidence is needed to unequivocally establish the structure.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

DISCUSSION OF ORD AND CD RESULTS

The ORD, CD and UV curves for (+)-camphor (IX) areshown in Figure 1, page 8 . The shapes of these three curvesare in reasonable agreement with those reported by Cookson

40et al. except that the CD curve reported herein indicates a possible second Cotton effect (CE) beginning to appear below 250 m̂ a. The molecular ellipticity ([©] 295 +4-630) also showed reasonable agreement with the value (t03 300 +5280)̂ '*" obtained on the Jouan Dichrograph.

Positive plain ORD curves have been reported for42isoborneol (XXIIIa) and borneol (XXIIIb) which is to be

expected since the hydroxyl chromophore absorbs UV light at approximately 170 m̂ i. Since the phenyl chromophore has, as previously discussed, been shown to be optically anisotropic when in an asymmetric environment, introduction of the aryl group into the isoborneol structure should produce CEs between 250 and 300 m u which is the area of UV absorption of the aryl chromophore for the transition. The 2-phenyl- (Xa) andthe 2-£-tolylisoborneols (Xc) gave negative CEs in the ORD (Fig. 3). No CE was observed in the ORD curves (Fig. 4) of 2-jo-anisyl- (Xb) and 2-^-chlorophenylisoborneols (Xd). The ORD curve for Xb showed the existence of a trough of rather small rotation while the ORD curve for Xd was a negative plain curve. In view of the fact that compounds Xa and Xc showed a CE while Xb and Xd did not, the CD curves (Fig. 5) were measured to check the reliability of the ORD data. All four arylisoborneols showed one distinctly measurable negative CE.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

37

1

0

1

2

3

_ J __________________________ I--------------------------------------------- L_200 300 400

Wavelength, m^i

Figure 3

Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves

(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) (--- )(-)-2-]D-Tolylisoborneol (Xc) (---)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

J O

1

0

1

2

3

200 300 400

Wavelength,

Figure 4

Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves

(“)-2-p-Anisylisoborneol (Xb) (— -)(")-2~]D-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd) (---)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

39

CO

CD

10

200 300 400

Wavelength, m^a

Figure 5

Circular Dichroism Curves

(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) (--- )(-)-2-jo-Anisylisoborneol (Xb) (---)(-)-2-£-Tolylisoborneol (Xc) (-«-.-)(-)-2-p-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd) (.oo.)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

40

a: = H, = OH

b: Rx = OH, R2 = H

The UV curves of the arylisoborneols were also measured (Fig. 6 and 7) in the region of the transition. Comparison of the pertinent data (Table II) from the CD and UV indicates a shift in the wavelength of the CD maximum consistent with the wavelength of the corresponding UV data. The shift in wavelength maximum reflects the electronic properties of the para-substituent on the phenyl chromophore. The values of [0] for the four arylisoborneols are in reason­able proportional agreement with the value of the molar ab­sorptivity ( e). This should be expected since [0] is a measure of Ae, that is, the difference in the molar absorp­tivity of the right and left components of polarized light.The [0] value for the alcohol Xb is slightly low but this may be due to the experimental error in the measurement of the CD. The CD gave a more reliable indication of the nature of the CE than was obtained from the ORD which appears to be due to the background rotation inherent in the ORD while the CD curve expresses more specifically the asymmetry in the immediate vicinity of the chromophore.

The results for the arylisoborneols verify that the phenyl chromophore is indeed responsible for the CE observed and that the amplitudes of the CE become larger with an increase in the electronic donating capacity of the para- substituent on the phenyl chromophore.

\

XXIII

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

41

4

3

2

1

270 300240

Wavelength, myu

Figure 6

Ultraviolet Spectra(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) (--- )(“)-2-jD-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd) (---)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

42

16

12

8

4

240 270 300

Wavelength, m p.

Figure 7

Ultraviolet Spectra(-)-2-g-Anisylisoborneol (Xb)(--- )(-)-2-£-Tolylisoborneol (Xc)(---)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Reproduced

with perm

ission of the

copyright ow

ner. Further

reproduction prohibited

without

permission.

Table IIORD, CD and UV Data—

b cORD" CD UV-Compound

(-)-2-Phenylisobomeol (Xa)

Midpointm/i262

Ampli­tude-5.0

Maximum A, mja [0]260 -2600

^max.258,251

e378

(”) -2-jo-Anisylisoborneol (Xb)Only the trough at 300 inja was obtained 274 -9500 274 1553

(-)-2-£-Tolylisoborneol (Xc) 257 -27.6 256 -9900 253 1391

.(“) -2-j5-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd) No Cotton Effect 267 -2840 265 434

(-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa) (253) (-474) 250 -124000 250 10543

(-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene (Xlb) (260) (-440) 256 -122000 254 12705

(-)-l-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb) 258 -100 258 -35200 258 3914

Amide XlXa derived from Xa No Cotton Effect 258 -1290 258 223

Amide XlXb derived Xb, Xlb and Xllb No Cotton Effect 276 -15100 277 1763

— All data were obtained in methanol solution with conditions as described in the Experimental, b— Numbers in parentheses indicate the longest wavelength and minimum amplitude of the Cotton

effect whose second extremum could not be precisely measured.— Only the strongest UV absorption band is reported.

44

The possibility of resonance interaction of the phenylring with the para-substituent affects the intensity of the

43UV curve. The migration of charge distorts the symmetry of the phenyl chromophore thereby making the *7/ *7? * transitionless forbidden causing an intensification of the absorption.In the absence of resonance effects, the inductive effect appears not to appreciably modify UV spectra. However, the UV spectrum is affected when both inductive and resonance effects are present. Since [0] is a measure of the difference in absorptivity of the left and right components of polarized light, it might, therefore, be expected that changes in [0] in the CD should be more pronounced than for e in the UV. The data obtained appear to substantiate this assumption since all the para-substituents have some resonance interaction with the phenyl ring, that is, they donate electrons to the ring via resonance. In order to display the opposite effect, that is, resonance interaction with the aromatic ring by the withdrawal of electrons, an attempted synthesis of 2-jo-(a,a,a-trifluoro)- tolylisoborneol (Xe) was carried out. The results of this experiment are discussed on page 20.

The ORD, CD and UV curves of the dehydrated products XIa, Xlb and Xllb of the arylisoborneols Xa and Xb are illus­trated in Figures 8 , 9 and 10 respectively. In the case of the ORD curves of the bornylene derivatives XIa and Xlb measurement through the peak of the negative CE could not be achieved due to the strong absorption of light by the sample. However, observation of the behavior of the instrument while measuring the ORD curves of compounds XIa and Xlb appeared to indicate that the maxima (peaks) of the CEs are located at approximately 240 mja as noted in Figure 8 . The amplitudes of the negative CEs for compounds XIa and Xlb were calculated along with their corresponding midpoints and are listed in

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

45

2

I

0

1

2

3

400200 300

Wavelength, mji

Figure 8

Optical Rotatory Dispersion Curves(-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa) (--- )(“)-2-£-Anisylbornylene (Xlb)(---)(-) -1-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb) (-.-.-)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

46

0

4

8

12

400300

Wavelength, mp.

Figure 9

Circular Dichroism Curves(-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa)(---)(-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene (Xlb)(--- )(-)-l-jD-Anisylcamphene (Xllb)(-•---)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

47

/ A12

8

4

240 270 300

Wavelength, m ji

Figure 10

Ultraviolet Spectra(-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa)(--- )(-)-2-g-Anisylbornylene (Xlb)(---)(-)-1-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb) (-«.-»-)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

48

the ORD data in Table II. The amplitude is defined as thedifference between the rotation at the extremum (peak ortrough) of longer wavelength minus the rotation at the

9bextremum of shorter wavelength divided by 100. The mid­point of the CE is that wavelength which is midway between9athe peak and trough of the CE. Since measurement through the peaks of the CEs could not be achieved as indicated above for the bornylene derivatives, the data appear in Table II in parentheses since they are somewhat questionable. The longest possible wavelength for the midpoint of the CE would be that indicated, but a shorter wavelength is possible in that the second extremum may be several m^u shorter because of instrumental difficulty in this region. The amplitudes as calculated indicate very large CEs. In the bornylene deriva­tives XIa and Xlb, a styrene chromophore exists. Considera­tion of the CD and UV data (Table II) shows that the promi­nent factor is the interaction between the phenyl ring and the conjugated double bond which overwhelms any interaction

- - of the p_-anisyl substituent with the phenyl ring.A negative CE was observed for the camphene deriva­

tive Xllb (Fig. 8) which was greater in amplitude than that observed for the arylisoborneols but considerably smaller than that for the compounds containing the styrene chromophore. In compound Xllb the double bond is no longer in conjugation with the phenyl chromophore but is one carbon atom removed. Consideration of a model of the camphene derivative Xllb indicates that even though the double bond is not in conjuga­tion with the phenyl group, some type of interaction -of the 5^-orbitals would be possible due to the proximity of the two

chromophores as imposed by the steric requirement of the44bicyclic system. Cookson and Warigar have investigated non­

conjugated systems involving the carbonyl and phenyl chromo-

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

49

24

16

8

0

200 300 400

Wavelength, rap

Figure 11

Optical Rotatory Dispersion CurvesAmide XlXa (Derived from Ritter Rx on

Xa) (--- )Amide XlXb (Derived from Ritter Rx on

Xb, Xlb and Xllb) (— )

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

50

+

300200 400

Wavelength, m^i

Figure 12

Circular Dichroism CurvesAmide XlXa (Derived from Ritter Rx on

Xa) (— )Amide XlXb (Derived from Ritter Rx on

Xb, Xlb and Xllb) (— )

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

51

phores and noted that increased intensity of the UV absorp­tion occurs when the p-orbitals of the two chromophores are such that they point at one another. They were not able to explain the exact nature of the interaction but did notethat the two chromophores must be sterically disposed for

s 45the p-orbitals to interact. Djerassi, e_t <jil. have reported extraordinarily high amplitudes for the bridged ketones of dimethylbiphenyl derivatives such as XXIV here­tofore encountered only with conjugated systems. They postulated homoconjugation of the carbonyl and benzene // - electrons and suggested that ORD offers a technique for the detection of nonconjugated V/*-orbital overlap. Mislow^has noted the same effect in the ORD curve of 5-methylene- bicyclo [2.2.1] hept-2-ene (XXV).

The ORD curves (Fig. 11) of the amides XlXa and XlXb were both positive plain curves. However, measurement of the CD (Fig. 12) produced negative CEs in both cases, the CE for XlXb being of greater intensity than that for XlXa. The UV spectra of the amides XlXa and XlXb are illustrated in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. Since the exact structure of these amides is questionable, no attempt will be made to correlate the ORD and CD data with that of structure.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

XXIV XXV

52

2

1

300270240

Wavelength, m p

Figure 13

Ultraviolet SpectrumAmide XlXa (Derived from Ritter Rx

on Xa)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

53

2

1

240 270 300

W a v e le n g th , mjp.

Figure 14

Ultraviolet SpectrumAmide XlXb (Derived from Ritter Rx

on Xb, Xlb and Xllb)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

54

SECTOR RULE

Since the conformation of the molecule has been47shown to have an influence on the CE , this factor will

now be considered from the point of view that negativeCotton effects were observed for all of the arylisoborneols.Consideration of a model of the arylisoborneols indicatesthat three conformations (Fig. 15: A, B and C) are possiblein which the planar phenyl ring eclipses one of the threeother substituents attached to the asymmetric carbon atom.To establish which conformation is the most likely to giverise to the experimentally observed negative CE, an attemptwas made to devise a sector rule in agreement with theexperimental results. A similar approach was adopted by

48Snatzke for the determination of a sector rule for thethree-membered ring conjugated with the carbonyl group. Asin the octant rule, specifications must be made for theproper orientation of the molecule on the three coordinatesystem. Three specifications will be imposed: (1) thesigns of the octants will be the same as those proposed forthe octant rule of cyclohexanones, (2) the planar phenyl ringis to be placed on the three coordinate system so that it isin a vertical position, and (3) the sign of the octant whichcontains substituents making the maximum perturbation of theelectronic cloud will become the sign of the Cotton effect.

49Schellman has formulated an hypothesis for orientation of the aromatic ring on a three-coordinate system such that the maximum symmetry of the ring prevails.. This requires the model under consideration to observe a nodal plane passing through the para-substituent of the aromatic ring and the

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

55

Figure 15

0/H H

B

/H

C

P o s s ib le C o n fo rm a tio n s o f th e A r y l is o b o r n e o ls

A*

N e g a t iv e CE

HO

B ’

P o s i t i v e CE

HO

C ‘P o s i t i v e CE

O r i e n t a t io n o f A ro m a tic R in g on T h r e e -D im e n s io n a l C o o r d in a te

S ystem

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

56

benzylic carbon. The choice remains as to which of the three substituents on the benzylic carbon will be eclipsed by the aromatic ring.

The arrangements of the three conformations on the coordinate system are illustrated in Figure 13: A', B' andC', respectively. Consideration of illustration A 1 shows that all atoms and groups are cancelled by corresponding atoms and groups in octants of opposite sign except for the C^-H in a positive octant and the Cy-C and C^q-CH^ in nega­tive octants. The result of applying the sector rule to conformation A predicts a negative CE. Orientation of con­formation B on the coordinate system with subsequent can­celling of corresponding groups and atoms in octants of opposite sign results in Cg ̂ .^-CHg being in positive octants and C^-CH, C^-CE^ and the OH being in negative octants. The sector rule in this case predicts a positiveCE. In the case of illustration C*, following the same

?

procedure as above, the atom and group distribution are C^-CH, Cg-C^, Cy-C, Cg-CHg and OH being located in positive octants and C^q -CH^ in a negative octant. The sector rule therefore predicts a positive CE for conformation C.

Since the experimental results show a negative CEfor the arylisoborneols, application of the sector rule*herein devised would indicate that conformation A (Fig. 15) is the preferred conformation for the arylisoborneols in which the aryl group eclipses the hydroxyl group. Examina­tion of molecular space-filling models (Fisher-Hirschfelder type) shows that the minimum Van der Waals interactions occur when the aryl group is in this conformation. Karabatsos"^ has used similar interpretations of interactions to predict the conformations of transition states which per­mit predictions of asymmetric inductions.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

I 57

SUMMARY

From the results obtained from the research reported in this thesis, the following conclusions may be stated:

1. In the case of the arylisoborneols, the presence of an electron donating substituent at the para-position of the aromatic ring intensifies the Cotton effect observed for the phenyl chromophore. This increase in the amplitude of

■X*the Cotton effect appears to result from the W - hT transi­tion becoming less forbidden.

2. The amplitude of the Cotton effect is much greater for the styrene chromophore than for the arylcar- binol chromophore. The effect on the styryl-CE of variation of the para-substituent of the phenyl group appears to be negligible.

3. Intensification of the Cotton effect attributed to the phenyl chromophore results from systems in which the steric requirements of the ring system place a non-conjugated double bond in very close proximity to the phenyl chromophore, as in the case of l-j>-anisylcamphene.

4. The application of a sector rule for the aryl­isoborneols appears to predict the sign of the Cotton effect which is in agreement with the sign experimentally determined.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

58

EXPERIMENTAL

The ORD curves were measured on a Rudolph spectro- polarimeter model 260/658/850/810-609. The path length was 0.1 dm and the solvent was methanol. The ORD data are reported in Table III, page 74. The CD curves were obtained on the attachment for the Cary 14 spectrophotometer equipped with scale expanison. The path length was 1 cm and the sol­vent was methanol. The CD data are reported in Table IV, page 76. The nmr spectra were obtained on a Varian A-60 instrument and the data are reported in Table I, page 21. Ultraviolet absorption spectra were measured on the Cary 14.The path length was 1 cm and the solvent was methanol.Table V, page 78, lists the concentrations of the samples measured in the UV.

(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa). - A solution of 179.8 g (1.07 m) of (+)-camphor (IX) in 250 ml of anhydrous tetra- hydrofuran was added dropwise during a period of one hr to a solution of phenylmagnesium bromide prepared from 29.9 g (1.23 g-atoms) of magnesium and 168 g (1.07 m) of bromobenzene dissolved in 250 ml of tetrahydrofuran. The mixture was heated at reflux for 2 hr, cooled to 0-5°, and hydrolyzed by dropwise addition of 120 g of ammonium chloride dissolved in 300 ml of water. The magnesium salts which separated were removed by decantation and washed twice with ether. The combined ethereal layers were washed twice with water and dried over anhydrous potassium carbonate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the remaining solution was distilled until the temperature reached 85°. The residue was subjected to subli-

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

59

mation at 15 mm pressure and an oil bath temperature of 100° in order to remove unreacted camphor. The viscous liquid remaining after the removal of camphor was distilled under reduced pressure yielding 66.7 g (27.1%) of Xa, bp 162.5-

o q q164° at 14 mm, [ c t ] n ' -36.2 (methanol, c, 13.87). The infra--1red spectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3600 cm ) and

aromatic (710 and 770 cm ^) bands; nmr spectrum, Fig. 16;UV curve, Fig. 6; ORD curve, Fig. 3, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 5, data, Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for ^1(^22®'' ^.41; H, 9.64. Found:C, 83.55; H, 9.61.

Dehydration of (-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa). - To a solution of 14.1 g (0.0613 m) of Xa dissolved in 150 ml of anhydrous ether was added 9.6 g of boron trifluoride etherate dissolved in 30 ml of ether. After storage at room tempera­ture for 3.5 hr, the solution was washed with 5% sodium bi­carbonate and water and was dried over magnesium sulfate.After evaporation of the solvent, 10.4 g of a light yellow oil was obtained. The nmr spectrum showed the oil to be a mixture of 2-phenylbornylene (XIa) (vinyl proton, r 4.06, doublet, J 3.5 cps) and 1-phenylcamphene (Xlla) (vinyl protons, t 5.43, singlet and t 5.72, singlet). GLPC analysis indicated that the mixture was composed of approximately 5C% of each component.

Hydroboration of the Mixture of 2-Phenylbornylene (XIa) and 1-Phenylcamphene (Xlla). - In a 250 ml three-necked flask, equipped with a thermometer, condenser, pressure equalizing dropping funnel, and gas-inlet tube, were placed 10.4 g of the mixture of 2-phenylbornylene and 1-phenylcamphene in 50 ml of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran. The flask was immersed in an ice

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

60

bath in order to maintain a temperature of 20°. After flush­ing the system with nitrogen, hydroboration was accomplished by dropwise addition of 20.0 ml of a 1.0M solution of borane in tetrahydrofuran, and the mixture was stirred for 2 hr maintaining a temperature of 20°. The excess hydride was destroyed by dropwise addition of 50 ml of a 5% solution of water in tetrahydrofuran. The reaction mixture was treated with 5.7 ml (0.074 m, density 0.992) of propionic acid, heated at reflux for 4 hr, cooled to room temperature and diluted with sufficient 3N sodium hydroxide to insure an excess of base. The upper layer was separated, washed with 25 ml of water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, the remaining liquid was distilled under reduced pressure yield­ing 3.2 g (61.6% based on the presence of 50% of each com­ponent in the original mixture as indicated by GLPC) of material, bp 125-126° at 6.5 mm, [a]^'^ -168.10 (methanol,£, 2.195). The nmr spectrum (Fig. 20) showed the liquid to be 2-phenylbornylene (XIa), vinyl proton, r 4.06, doublet,J 3.5 cps. UV curve, Fig. 10; ORD curve, Fig. 8 , data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 9, data, Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for C, 90.49; H, 9.51. Found:C, 90.00; H, 9.61.

(-)-2-£-Anisylisoborneol (Xb). - From 15.0 g (0.615g-atom) of magnesium, 100 g (0.535 m) of £-bromoanisole, 82.5 g (0.535 m) of (+)-camphor (IX) and 250 ml of anhydrous tetra­hydrofuran there was obtained, after heating at reflux for2 hr, hydrolysis with ammonium chloride solution, and vacuum sublimation (80° at 4 mm), 40.5 g of white solid. The solid was recrystallized from ethanol to afford 35.2 g (25%) of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

61

(-)-2-jo-anisylisoborneol (Xb), mp 103.5-105.0°, [ a ] ^ ‘̂ -26.0° (methanol, £, 4.236). The infrared spectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3600 cm ) and aromatic bands of a jo- disubstituted benzene (840 cm ); nmr spectrum, Fig. 17;UV curve, Fig. 7; ORD curve, Fig. 4, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 5, data, Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for C, 78.40; H, 9.31. Found:C, 78.66; H, 9.36.

(-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene (Xlb). - To a solution of 24.15 g (0.0925 m) of (-)-2-p-anisylisoborneol (Xb) dissolved in 375 ml of anhydrous ether was added 14.2 g of boron tri­fluoride etherate dissolved in 125 ml of ether. After stand­ing at room temperature for 3 hr, the mixture was washed with 57o sodium bicarbonate and water and was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After evaporation of the solvent, the white solid was recrystallized from ethanol to afford 16.9 g (75.5%) of (-)-2-£-anisylbornylene (Xlb), mp 83-85°, [a]^'^ -139.7° (methanol, £, 1.364). NMR spectrum, Fig. 21, vinyl proton, t 4.10, doublet, J 3.5 cps; UV curve, Fig. 10; ORD curve, Fig. 8 , data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 9, data,Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for C, 84.23; H, 9.17. Found:C, 84.21; H, 9.30.

(-)-l-£-Anisylcamphene (Xllb). - A solution of 4.35 g (0.016 m) of (-)-2-p-dnisylisobomeol (Xb) in 200 ml of abso­lute ethanol and 53.3 ml of 6N sulfuric acid was heated under reflux for 1.7 hr. The mixture was cooled, the alcohol removed under reduced pressure, and the residue extracted with ether. The ethereal solution was washed with 5% sodium bi­carbonate and water and was dried over anhydrous magnesium sul­fate. After evaporation of the solvent, the white solid was

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

62

recrystallized from ethanol to afford 1.65 g (42.5%) of Xllb, mp 49.5-51°, [ct]J7 '6 -30.6° (methanol, c, 0.3268). The nmr spectrum showed the presence of vinyl protons at t 5.48, singlet and t 5.82, singlet; UV curve, Fig. 10; ORD curve,Fig. 8 , data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 9, data, Table IV.

(-)-2-jo-Tolylisoborneol (Xc). - From 15.0 g (0.615 g-atom) of magnesium, 91.5 g (0.535 m) of jo-bromotoluene, 82.5 g (0.535 m) of (+)-camphor (IX) and 250 ml of anhydrous tetra­hydrofuran, there was obtained, after heating at reflux for 2 hr, hydrolysis with ammonium chloride solution, vacuum sub­limation (80-90° at 6 mm) to remove unreacted camphor, and vacuum distillation, 4.70 g (3.59%) of (-)-2-jD-tolyliso- borneol, bp 144° at 2 mm, -36.3° (methanol, £, 1.003).The infrared spectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3500 cm ^) and aromatic bands of a jo-disubstituted benzene (840 cm ); nmr spectrum, Fig. 18; UV curve, Fig. 7; ORD curve,Fig. 3, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 5, data, Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for C ^ H ^ O : C, 83.53; H, 9.92. Found:C, 83.80; H, 9.99.

(-)-2-£-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd). - The Grignardreagent was prepared by dropwise addition of a solution of 112.4 g (0.535 m) of jo-chlorobromobenzene in 200 ml of an­hydrous diethyl ether to 13.0 g (0.535 g-atom) of magnesium in 100 ml of diethyl ether. The mixture was heated under reflux for 1.25 hr followed by distillation of the diethyl ether with subsequent addition of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran.A solution of 82.5 g (0.535 m) of (+)-camphor (IX) was added dropwise to the Grignard reagent during a period of one hr.The mixture was heated under reflux for 2.25 hr, cooled to 5°, and hydrolyzed by dropwise addition of 60 g of ammonium

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

63

chloride dissolved in 175 ml of water. The customary workupfollowed including vacuum sublimation (90° at 3 mm) in orderto remove unreacted camphor. The viscous liquid was distilledunder reduced pressure yielding a liquid (bp 156-160° at 3 mm)which solidified on cooling. Recrystallization from ethanolafforded 4.90 g (3.46%) of (-)-2-£-chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd),mp 66.5-68°, [a]21'2 -31.8° (methanol, c, 0.9296). The in-

-1frared spectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3500 cm ) and aromatic bands of a £-disubstituted benzene (830 cm ^); nmr spectrum, Fig. 19; UV curve, Fig. 6; ORD curve, Fig. 4, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 5, data, Table IV.

Anal. Calcd. for C16H21C10: C, 72.58; H, 7.99. Found:C, 72.20; H, 8.03.

Attempted Preparation of 2-£-(a,q,q-Trifluoro)tolyl- isoborneol (Xe). - A solution of 33.8 g (0.222 m) of (+)- camphor in 120 ml of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was added drop- wise to a solution of a Grignard reagent prepared from 6.2 g (0.254 g-atom) of magnesium and 50 g (0.222 m) of £-bromo- q,q,q-trifluorotoluene. The mixture was heated at reflux for 3 hr, cooled to 0-5 °, and hydrolyzed by dropwise addition of 30 g of ammonium chloride dissolved in 150 ml of water. The magnesium salts which separated were removed by decantation and washed with two 100 ml portions of ether. The combined ethereal layers were washed with two 50 ml portions of water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue remaining was distilled to a maximum temperature of 110°. The distillate was shown by infrared spectrum to be camphor (carbonyl, 1750 cm '*’). The red residue remaining in the distillation flask was treated with 50 ml of petroleum ether (bp 65-75°) and the

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

64

solid that did not dissolve was separated by filtration. The red solid was recrystallized from ether to afford 2.5 g of material, mp 275° dec. No attempt was made to further identify this material. Evaporation of the petroleum ether afforded0.03 g of di-(a,a,a-trifluoro)tolyl, mp 91.5-93°; lit.“*̂ 92-93°.

Ritter Reaction on (-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) - A. Acetonitrile as Solvent. - To a stirred solution of 60 ml of acetonitrile and 1.5 ml (0.082 m) of concentrated sulfuric acid was added 6.25 g (0.025 m) of (-)-2-phenylisoborneol (Xa) in small portions while the temperature was maintained at about 20°. The reaction vessel was loosely stoppered and allowed to stand at room temperature for 21 hr. The solid material which formed was separated by suction filtration, dissolved in methanol, and neutralized with concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The solid which precipitated was recrystallized from methanol to afford 4.20 g (61.9%) of an amide XlXa , mp 158-160°,

+36.5° (methanol, £, 0.8212). The infrared spectrum showed the presence of secondary amide (3300, 1650 and 1525 cm )̂ and monosubstituted aromatic (760 and 700 cm ^) bands;UV curve, Fig. 13; ORD curve, Fig. 11, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 12, data, Table IV; nmr spectrum, Fig. 26.

Anal. Calcd. for C ^ H ^ N O : C, 79.64; H, 9.30; N, 5.16.Found: C, 79.06; H, 9.48; N, 5.02.

B. Glacial Acetic Acid as Solvent. - To a stirred solu­tion of 50 ml of glacial acetic acid and 2.9 ml (0.056 m) of concentrated sulfuric acid was added a solution of 3.2 ml (0.06 m) of acetonitrile and 12.8 g (0.056 m) of (-)-2-phenyliso­borneol (Xa) in small portions while the temperature was main­tained at about 20°. The reaction vessel was loosely stop­pered and allowed to stand at room temperature for 27 hr. The solution was poured over 50 g of crushed ice. Neutralization

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

65

with concentrated ammonium hydroxide resulted in a solid being precipitated. After removal of the solid by suction filtra­tion, if. was recrystallized from methanol to afford 5.35 g ofa solid acetate XVIIIa, mp 84.5-86°. The infrared spectrum

-1showed the presence of acetate (1740 cm ) and monosubstituted aromatic (770 and 710 cm ) bands; nmr spectrum, Fig. 22. Without further purification the acetate XVIIIa was subjected to reduction by lithium aluminum hydride.

Lithium Aluminum Hydride Reduction of Acetate XVIIIa. - A solution of 4.0 g (0.015 m) of acetate XVIIIa in 50 ml of anhydrous ether was added dropwise to a suspension of 1.1 g of lithium aluminum hydride in 100 ml of anhydrous ether under constant stirring. Stirring was continued for 1.5 hr after complete addition of the ester. Wet ether and then water were added. The suspension was separated by filtration and the solid was washed with two 25 ml portions of ether. The com­bined ethereal solution was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Evaporation of the solvent produced a solid which on recrystallization from a mixture of ethanol and water afforded 2.15 g (62.0%) of an alcohol XXa, mp 114-116°. The infraredspectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3350 cm ) and mono-

-1substituted aromatic (760 and 700 cm ) bands; nmr spectrum, Fig. 23.

Anal. Calcd. for ^ 2® : C, 83.41; H, 9.64. Found:C, 82.93; H, 9.42.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Ritter Reaction on jj-Anisyl Derivatives. - A. (-)-l-^TAnisylcamphene (Xllb) . - A mixture of 2.42 g (0.01 m) of (-)-1-jo-anisylcamphene (Xllb) and 7 ml of acetonitrile was added dropwise to a stirred solutionc£ 20 ml of glacial acetic acid containing 1 g (0.01 m) of concentrated sulfuric acid while the temperature was maintained at about 20°. The reaction vessel was then stoppered loosely and allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 hr. The solution was poured over 20 g of crushed ice and neutralized with concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The oil which separated was extracted with two 100 ml portions of ether and the combined extracts dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After evaporation of the solvent, the white solid was recrystallized from methanol to afford 0.35 g (11.6%) of an amide XlXb, mp 153.5- 155°, [a]‘̂ >’~> +20.2° (methanol, £, 0.9920). The infraredspectrum showed the presence of secondary amide (3250, 1650

-1 -1and 1550 cm ) and aromatic (830 cm ) bands; nmr spectrum,Fig. 24; UV curve, Fig. 14; ORD curve, Fig. 11, data, Table III; CD curve, Fig. 12, data, Table IV. The nmr data indi­cated that the amide was the product of rearrangement of the molecule and was analogous to that (XlXa) obtained from the Ritter reaction of the phenyl derivative, but absolute identi­fication was impossible from the available data.

Anal. Calcd. for C, 75.69; H, 9.05; N, 4.65.Found: C, 75.32; H, 9.38; N, 4.42.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

67

B. (-)-2-£-Anisylbornylene (Xlb). - To a stirred solution of 50 ml of glacial acetic acid, 2.7 ml (0.05 m) of concentrated sulfuric acid, and 3 ml (0.055 m) of aceto­nitrile was added 12.12 g (0.05 m) of (-)-2-£-anisylbornylene (Xlb) in small portions while the temperature was maintained at about 20°. The reaction vessel was stoppered loosely and allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 hr. The solution was poured over 50 g of crushed ice and neutralized with con­centrated ammonium hydroxide. The oil which separated was extracted with two 100 ml portions of ether and the combined ethereal extracts were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the remaining oil was treated with petroleum ether (bp 30-60 °) and the solid that formed was separated by filtration. The white solid was recrystallized from methanol to afford 2.15 g (14.3%) of an amide XlXb, mp 153-154.5°. Upon removal of the petroleum ether under reduced pressure from the above fil­trate there was obtained 4.30 g df a crude oil, the infraredspectrum of which indicated that it is an acetate XVIIIb:

-1 -1acetate (1730 cm ) and aromatic (840 cm ) bands. Withoutfurther purification the acetate XVIIIb was subjected to re­duction by lithium aluminum hydride.

C. (-)-2-£-Anisylisoborneol (Xb). - To a stirred solution of 50 ml of glacial acetic acid, 2.7 ml (0.05 m) of concentrated sulfuric acid and 3 ml (0.055 m) of acetonitrile were added 13.0 g (0.05 m) of (-)-2-£-anisylisoborneol (Xb) in small portions while the temperature was maintained at about 20°. The reaction vessel was loosely stoppered and allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 hr. The solution was poured over 50 g of crushed ice and neutralized with concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The oil which separated was

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

68

extracted with two 100 ml portions of ether and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the remaining oil was treated with petroleum ether (bp 30-60°) and the solid that formed was removed by filtration. The white solid was recrystallized from methanol to afford 0.35 g (2.3%) of an amide XlXb, mp 151-153°. Upon removal of the petroleum ether under reduced pressure from the above filtrate, there was obtained 7.40 g of a crude oil, the infrared spectrum ofwhich indicates that it is an acetate XVIIIb: acetate (1730

-1 -1cm ) and aromatic (840 cm ) bands. Without further purifi­cation the acetate XVIIIb was subjected to reduction by lithium aluminum hydride.

Lithium Aluminum Hydride Reduction of Acetate XVIIIb.A solution of 7.40 g (0.025 m) of the acetate XVIIIb in 50 ml of anhydrous ether was added dropwise to a suspension of 1.5 g of lithium aluminum hydride in 150 ml of anhydrous ether under constant stirring. Stirring was continued for 1.5 hr after complete addition of the ester. Ethyl acetate and water were added. The suspension was separated by filtration and the precipitate washed with two 25 ml portions of ether. The com­bined ethereal solutions were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Evaporation of the solvent produced an oil which was distilled under reduced pressure (4 mm) to a maximum tempera­ture of 130°. The residue remaining after completion of the distillation was recrystallized from a mixture of ethanol and water to afford 0.6 g of an alcohol XXb, mp 84-86°. The in- frared spectrum showed the presence of hydroxyl (3500 cm ) and jo-disubstituted aromatic (840 cm ) bands; nmr spectrum,

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

69

Fig. 25. The spectral data indicated that the alcohol XXb was analogous to that from the phenyl derivative XXa. The nmr spectral data indicated that the alcohols XX had the same structures as the amides XIX with the OH replacing the NHAc substituents.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. E. L. Eliel, Stereochemistry of Carbon Compounds, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, pp. 2-4.

2. P. Crabbe, Optical Rotatory Dispersion and Circular Dichroism in Organic Chemistry, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1965, p.l.

3. T. M. Lowry, Optical Rotatory Power, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1935.

4. W. Haidinger, Ann. Phys., 70, 531 (1847).

5. H. C. Rudolph, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 45, 50 (1955).

6 . S. Mitchell, The Cotton Effect, G. Bell and Sons, Ltd., London, 1933.

7. C. Djerassi, Optical Rotatory Dispersion: Applications to Organic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, New York, I960,pp. 150-177..

8 . W. Moffitt and A. Moscowitz, J. Chem. Phys.,30, 648 (1959).

9. (a) C. Djerassi and W. Klyne, Proc. Chem. Soc.,55 (1957).

(b) C. Djerassi and W. Klyne, J. Chem. Soc.,4929 (1962).

10. W. Moffitt, R. B. Woodward, A. Moscowitz, W. Klyne andC. Djerassi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 4013 (1961).

11. W. Kuhn and H. Biller, Z. physik. Chem., B29, 1 (1935).

12. L. Verbit, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 1617 (1965).

13. B. Sjoberg, Acta Chem. Scand., 14, 273 (I960).

14. G. G. Lyle, J. Org. Chem., 25, 1779 (1960).

15. G. G. Lyle and J. J. Santos, Chemistry Department, University of New Hampshire, unpublished results; Boletin de la Sociedad Quimica del Peru, in press.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

71

16. T. M. Hooker, Jr. and C. Tanford, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,8 6, 4989 (1964).

17. A. Moscowitz, A. Rosenberg and A. E. Hansen, J . Am. Chem., Soc. , 87_, 1813 (1965).

18. A. Moscowitz, K. Mislow, M. A. W. Glass and C. Djerassi,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84_, 1945 (1962).

19. G. G. Lyle and W. Lacroix, J. Org. Chem., 28, 900 (1963).

20. L. Verbit, S. Mitsui and Y. Senda, Tetrahedron, 22_, 753(1966) .

21. (a) N. Finch, C. W. Gemenden, I. Hsui-GhU Hsu, A. Kerr,G. A. Sim and W. I. Taylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 2229(1965) .(b) W. Klyne, R. J. Swan, B. W. Bycroft, D. Schumann and H. Schmid, Helv. Chim. Acta, 4£, 443 (1965).(c) A. R. Battersby, I. R. C. Bick, W. Klyne, P. J. Jennings, R. M. Scopes and M. J. Vernengo, J. Chem. Soc., 2239 (1965).(d) J. C. Craig and S. K. Roy, Tetrahedron, 21, 401 (1965) .(e) R. J. Swan and W. Klyne, Chem. Ind. (London),2018 (1965).(f) G. G. de Angelis, Ph. D. Thesis, Iowa State Univer­sity, 1966.

22. j S. Ledric, Compt. rend., 180, 1502 (1925).

23. N. C. Deno, P. T. Groves, J. J. Jaruzelski and M. N. Lugasch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 4719 (1960).

24. W. F. Erman and T. J. Flautt, J. Org. Chem.,27, 1526 (1962^.

25. M. S. Kharasch and O.Relnmuth, Grignard Reactions of Nonmetallic Substances, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, 1954, p. 140.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

72

26. M. S. Kharasch and 0. ReLnmuth, ibid., pp. 167-169.

27. P. D. Bartlett, E. R. Webster, C. E. Dills and H. G. Richey, Jr., Ann., 623, 217 (1959).

28. S. Beckmann, R. Schaber and R. Bamberger, Chem. Ber.,87, 997 (1954).

29. H. C. Brown, Hydroboration, W. E. Benjamin, New York,1962, pp. 62-66.

30. J. J. Ritter and P. P. Minieri, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,70, 4045 (1948).

31. J. J. Ritter and J. Kalish, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,70, 4048 (1948).sssss

32. J. J. Ritter, U. S. 2,573,673; Oct. 30, 1951 (CA: 46, P9584h).

33. G. A. Stein, M. Sletzinger, D. Reinhold, W. Gaines and K. Pfister, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 1514 (1956).

34. T. S. Luskin, A. J. McFaull and G. E. Gantert,J. Org. Chem., 2JL, 1430 (1956).

35. R. H. Eastman and C. R. Noller in H. Gilman, Organic Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, New York, Vol. IV, p. 654.

36. C. W. Roberts and M. L. Maskaleris, J. Org. Chem.,24, 926 (1959).

37. W. Erman, Proctor & Gamble, Co., Cincinnati, Ohio,Private communication.

38. H. Cristol, A. Laurent and M. Mousseron, Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 2313 (1961).

39. ( a ) J. D. Roberts, C. C. Lee and W. H. Saunders, Jr.,J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 76̂ , 4501 (1954) .(b) P. de Mayo, The Chemistry of Natural Products Vol. II Mono- and Sesquiterpenoids, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1959, pp. 161-170.

40. D. E. Bays, G. W. Cannon and R. C. Cookson,J. Chem. Soc., 888 (1966B).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

73

41. L. Velluz, M. Legrand and M. Grosjean, Optical CircularDichroism, Academic Press, New York, 1965, p. 211.

42. P. Crabbe, Optical Rotatory Dispersion and CircularDichroism in Organic Chemistry, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1965, pp. 264-265.

43. H. H. Jaffe and M. Orchin, Theory and Application of Ultraviolet Spectroscopy, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1 9 6 2 , p p . 2 5 0 - 2 5 7 .

44. R. C. Cookson and N. S. Warigar, J. Chem. Soc.,2302 (1956).

45. C. Djerassi, K. Mislow, M. A. Glass, R. E. O'Brien,P. Rutkin, D. H. Steinberg and J. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 1455 (1962).

46. K. Mislow, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 93, 459 (1962).

47. C. Djerassi, Optical Rotatory Dispersion: Applications co Organic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960,pp. 178-190.

48. G. Snatzke, Tetrahedron, 21, 413, 421, 439 (1965).

49. J. A. Schellman, J. Chem. Phys., 44, 55 (1966).

50. G. J. Karabatsos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 1367 (1967).

51. M. R. Pettit and J. C. Tatlow, J. Chem. Soc.,1071 (1954).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

A P P E N D IX

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Reproduced

with perm

ission of the

copyright ow

ner. Further

reproduction prohibited

without

permission.

Table III

Optical Rotatory Dispersion Data

(+)-Camphor (IX, £1.097, MeOH, 29.8°, Fig. 1):[$]589 +59‘6; t$]312 +374°; [^ 275 W 250 "284°

(-)-2-Phenylisobomeol (Xa, £ 13.87, MeOH, 29.3°, Fig. 3):[4>J589 -161; [<f>J2 n -1850; 255 -1367; [<*>] 232 -3340

(-)-2-£-Anisylisoborneol (Xb, £ 4.246, MeOH, 29.5°, Fig. 4):[♦]589 -67.5; [♦1300 -445; m 2 W -307

(-)-2-£-Tolylisobomeol (Xc, £ 1.003, MeOH, 20.8°, Fig. 3):^ 589 _88-5j ̂̂ 268 “2430; ^^ 246 +324j [^235 "194°

(-)-2-£-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd, £ 0.9296, MeOH, 21.2°, Fig. 4): [41589 -84.1; [41330 -454; I<«>] 26Q -1990; 1 25Q -2980

(-)-2-Phenylbomylene (XIa, £ 2.195, MeOH, 30.8°, Fig. 8):[4]589 -357; [4]350 -2250; [ 4 ] ^ -9760

(-)-2-£-Anisylbomylene (Xlb, £ 1.364, MeOH, 26.2°, Fig. 8):|>] 589 -337; m 330 -3550; [̂ 3 3Q0 -8870

(-)-l-£-Anisylcamphene (Xllb, £ 0.3268, MeOH, 17.6°, Fig. 8):

f*]589 -74; [01 273 •4520; ["’1243 +5380; W 240 +4736

Table

III

(2)

75

o00 <f CM+oMOCM

1 I U _ J

•o• • O • • CT\

O +1— 1 CO rHT—I + i— 1 oo

• o • CO60 o 60 1— ,•H CO •H -e-

-o-I—J

1— 1 n •0 0 oCO • *\ m m• o • <fr^ vO vD +i— i

+CN or» ft m

SJ o cd COo in o r~“oa) CO Q) ■©•S i i

•e- Sft i—i r\ • **

(N o oo• CM •<N a> Cft o00 as a\ M0

« + • +o oa \ olu j 00 00ini i

'_' mCO -e- rQ

K 1—1 XH

1—1X Xa) CD

TO X )•H •H

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

76

in

>Ha)

T— lrQtoH

CO4-1COQ0COftOMrdoQO CO i— Idoufto

UOftCOIoCMCM

UO

bJO•HPmPdo

inbOftPmPdoa)

inb O•HPmpdoa)

b Oftfa

PdoajSS I

cni

Cnb O•HPmPdO

Ovb OftPmPdO0)

cnb O•HPmPdo

CDs✓•n CD <u s o o O1—1 ■— i s n o 1— I S o #\ O ff\ o

S I o ft o S I o S I o• • *\ uo S I X ft CM 00 obO o S I D - S I uo < ± vO r^ -

f t 1 1 < f CM l 1 1 8 CMPm in co o 1 00 < f o o i

• i o r™l o o O • o 1 o \—i o t—1r \ < ± o VO r—1 CM o CO CO uo

Pd uo \—I o X CM o o i-i CM X CO X < fo CM CO r— i X CO U | CO r—n 1— 1 CMCV r—-i X CM CO CD CM CM X CD CO C D UO i— i

S CD ,— , o i— i CM r— i ft I— 1 U _ d CM i— ' VO CD■— i oo CD • CM CD X) CD VO • • 1— >r\ cn i— t 00 • i— i X ■— i f t • * \ \-----1 • r*

S I • • o 00 '_' • o o • r*O CM • ** o | o • • r, *—i o o | o o | o

CM o in o | o 1— 1 o o o o1 VO U | o ft o v o o < f o | < t ft CM #0 CMO VO r-Q i ft cn at 00 CM X CM r Q uot—1 + r\ CM ><I o cn d CM ft i—1 f t i—1 f t CO

CO 1 >•___' UO X i i f i 1 CD 1 X 1 f t 1

X in « o M Xcn O r H CO vO r Q f t X o vO 00

1—1 CM VO O f t i—1 UO O VO - w in CD U0 uoCO i— , 1— 1 CM CD CM o CM CO CM CM d CM CD CM

• CD o ,—, d i—, CD r*—t f t ,— i CD CD ,—, d l~—0CM i—i CD CD Cl CD d CD i—1 CD d CD f t CD CD CD

id >—i o 1 .) P4 •—t bn i— i CD L__i bn L-ft rd ■—io | c r Q o d t—1 d &• ̂ o • ** o • *\ rQ ■ r\ CD • r\ X • ̂ u • •

« o rQ o CO O o o rd o d O o o CD oX o f t CO f t S r Q of t o CO o f t o • r 4 VO o o o f t uo 1—1 o

oo •H cn bn o i—1 cn P4 I—1 r Q O X O bn oCO i—1 CM CO CO bn CM o CO T— I CO CO CO CO CO

U r ~*i b n ,— , •H r— n f t i— , t-H ,— , X •H p—l ft ,— 1O CD d CD d CD O CD dd CD d CD d CD d CD,d i— i CD i— j C L— 1 H i— i o i—i CD i— i < L J < 1— -J

a x i i 1 i rd 1 10 Ph o4 O j o4 f t 04 o4CO i i i g 1 ■ i

ai

CM1

CM1 CM| CM| CMI CMg

i—ii

/—N /-N /*“N ✓“N /■—\+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 i'_' v - / V—/ 'w / _̂'

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

77

/-NCM O'w ' • • • • O

/-N /^ \ 1^.> CM CM OVH \—1 i—1 1

OCD • • VO

r— \ 00 LO 50 mrQ •H cn •H CMCO pL| CM i--- i

EH i— , CDrt CD rv <— i

W Edo o • ̂a) • *\ a> O

S o S oOv !—1

c\ CM <\ inS I i—1

1 S I t—! 1

CO < ±i 00 1 VOo m o1—1 CM t—i CM

r— -1 1--- 1CD X CD

i— ivO cnO • r-> •

• o • OvO m

o oo | 00 o j T"”l

CM COr— i r—I

CO CD JO CDI—J '—1

M><!

MX

<u 0)x i X )•rt •rt

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

78

Table V

Concentrations of Samples for UV Spectra

3Compound— Concentration, M

(+)-Camphor (IX) 2.89 x 10-2

(-)-2-Phenylisoborneol (Xa) 2.41 x 10"3-4(-)-2-j>-Anisylisoborneol (Xb) 5.21 x 10

(-)-2-£-Tolylisoborneol (Xc) 4.93 x 10'4

(-)-2-p-Chlorophenylisoborneol (Xd) 1.69 x 10'3

(-)-2-Phenylbornylene (XIa) 8.28 x 10"5

(-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene (Xlb) 4.51 x 10~5

(-)-1-jo-Anisylcamphene (Xllb) 4.65 x 10 4

Amide XIXa 6.06 x 10 3

Amide XlXb 5.73 x 10"4

“ The solvent in all cases was methanol.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

79

Figure 16. (-)-2-Phenylisoborneol

Figure 17. (-)-2-£-Anisylisoborneol

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

80

Figure 18„ (-)-2-g-Tolylisoborneol

Figure 19. (-)-2-£-Chlorophenylisoborneol

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

81

Figure 20. (-)-2-Phenylbornylene

to o

Figure 21. (-)-2-jo-Anisylbornylene

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

|~i

82

Figure 22. Acetate XVIIIa

Figure 23. Alcohol XXa

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

83

Figure 24. Amide XlXb

Figure 25. Alcohol XXb

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

84

Figure 26. Amide XlXa

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.


Recommended