+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma [email protected] 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma [email protected] 26 th September 2005.

Date post: 20-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: gregory-boyd
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
Ambrish Varma Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma [email protected] 26 th September 2005
Transcript
Page 1: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 1

Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN

Ambrish [email protected]

26th September 2005

Page 2: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 2

Three Cases

GRND

3.3 V

40 Ω 40 Ω50 Ω

L1

L3

L1

L6

L2L2

► Adapted from Hall, Hall and McCall, “High-Speed Digital System Design,” p.121► Buffers are Arpad’s IBIS class HSPICE design (not IBIS)► Receiver is disabled driver► Transmission line references are universal ground

► GRND is not ”ideal 0” – a DC source with 0 V is placed between “GRND” and 0This slide same as Michael Mirmak’s

Page 3: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 3

Case1.options accurate post probe numdgt=10 measdgt=10 ingold .tran 10p 100n* NOTE - "ideal ground node 0" is defined as an effectively* lossless low-impedance ground plane.* Similarly the voltage node 1.5 V is assumed an* effectively lossless low-impedance power plane.Vpwr pwr 0 DC=3.3Vgnd grnd 0 DC=0

Xdriver input drv_out drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xreceiver rcv_pwr rcv_in rcv_pwr rcv_gnd rcv_pwr IO_buf Venable enable drv_gnd DC=0Vinput input drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)

Tdrv drv_bw grnd line_out grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv rcv_bw grnd line_in grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline line_out grnd line_in grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=7.5nLline_drv drv_out drv_bw L=9nLpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=9n

Lgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=7.5nLline_rcv rcv_in rcv_bw L=9nLpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=9n

.print V(pwr,grnd) V(drv_pwr, drv_gnd) V(rcv_in,grnd) V(rcv_in, rcv_gnd)+ I(Vpwr) I(Vgnd).end

Page 4: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 4

Case2.options accurate post probe numdgt=10 measdgt=10 ingold .tran 10p 100n* NOTE - "ideal ground node 0" is defined as an effectively* lossless low-impedance ground plane.* Similarly the voltage node 1.5 V is assumed an* effectively lossless low-impedance power plane.Vpwr pwr 0 DC=3.3Vgnd grnd 0 DC=0

Xdriver input drv_out drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xreceiver rcv_pwr rcv_in rcv_pwr rcv_gnd rcv_pwr IO_buf Venable enable drv_gnd DC=0Vinput input drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)

Tdrv drv_bw grnd line_out grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv rcv_bw grnd line_in grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline line_out grnd line_in grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=0nLline_drv drv_out drv_bw L=16.5nLpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=1.5nK1 Lline_drv Lpwr_drv 0.476731295Lgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=0nLline_rcv rcv_in rcv_bw L=16.5nLpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=1.5nK2 Lline_rcv Lpwr_rcv 0.476731295

.print V(pwr,grnd) V(drv_pwr, drv_gnd) V(rcv_in,grnd) V(rcv_in, rcv_gnd)+ I(Vpwr) I(Vgnd).end

Page 5: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 5

Case3.options accurate post probe numdgt=10 measdgt=10 ingold .tran 10p 100n* NOTE - "ideal ground node 0" is defined as an effectively* lossless low-impedance ground plane.* Similarly the voltage node 1.5 V is assumed an* effectively lossless low-impedance power plane.Vpwr pwr 0 DC=3.3Vgnd grnd 0 DC=0

Xdriver input drv_out drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xreceiver rcv_pwr rcv_in rcv_pwr rcv_gnd rcv_pwr IO_buf Venable enable drv_gnd DC=0Vinput input drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)

Tdrv drv_bw grnd line_out grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv rcv_bw grnd line_in grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline line_out grnd line_in grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=0nLline_drv drv_out drv_bw L=9nLpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=9n

Lgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=15nLline_rcv rcv_in rcv_bw L=9nLpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=9n

.print V(pwr,grnd) V(drv_pwr, drv_gnd) V(rcv_in,grnd) V(rcv_in, rcv_gnd)+ I(Vpwr) I(Vgnd).end

Page 6: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 6

Receiver Input Vs Receiver Ground (rcv_gnd)

Case1

Case2

Case3

Page 7: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 7

Receiver Input Vs System Ground (grnd)

Case1

Case2

Case3

Page 8: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 8

Case1 – 4 drivers* Case1.options accurate post probe numdgt=10 measdgt=10 ingold .tran 10p 100n* NOTE - "ideal ground node 0" is defined as an effectively* lossless low-impedance ground plane.* Similarly the voltage node 1.5 V is assumed an* effectively lossless low-impedance power plane.Vpwr pwr 0 DC=3.3Vgnd grnd 0 DC=0Xdriver1 input1 drv_out1 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver2 input2 drv_out2 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver3 input3 drv_out3 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver4 input4 drv_out4 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf

Xreceiver1 pwr rcv_in1 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver2 pwr rcv_in2 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver3 pwr rcv_in3 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver4 pwr rcv_in4 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf

Venable enable drv_gnd DC=0

Vinput1 input1 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput2 input2 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput3 input3 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)*Vinput4 input4 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput4 input4 drv_gnd DC=0

Tdrv1 drv_bw1 grnd line_out1 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv1 rcv_bw1 grnd line_in1 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline1 line_out1 grnd line_in1 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Tdrv2 drv_bw2 grnd line_out2 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv2 rcv_bw2 grnd line_in2 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline2 line_out2 grnd line_in2 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Page 9: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 9

Cont..Tdrv3 drv_bw3 grnd line_out3 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv3 rcv_bw3 grnd line_in3 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline3 line_out3 grnd line_in3 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Tdrv4 drv_bw4 grnd line_out4 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv4 rcv_bw4 grnd line_in4 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline4 line_out4 grnd line_in4 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=7.5n

Lline_drv1 drv_bw1 drv_out1 L=9nLline_drv2 drv_bw2 drv_out2 L=9nLline_drv3 drv_bw3 drv_out3 L=9nLline_drv4 drv_bw4 drv_out4 L=9n

Lpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=9nLgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=7.5n

Lline_rcv1 rcv_bw1 rcv_in1 L=9nLline_rcv2 rcv_bw2 rcv_in2 L=9nLline_rcv3 rcv_bw3 rcv_in3 L=9nLline_rcv4 rcv_bw4 rcv_in4 L=9n

Lpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=9n

.print V(pwr,grnd) V(drv_pwr, drv_gnd) V(rcv_in1,grnd) V(rcv_in1, rcv_gnd)+ V(rcv_in4,grnd) V(rcv_in4, rcv_gnd) I(Vpwr) I(Vgnd).end

Page 10: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 10

Case3 – 4 Drivers* Case1.options accurate post probe numdgt=10 measdgt=10 ingold .tran 10p 100n* NOTE - "ideal ground node 0" is defined as an effectively* lossless low-impedance ground plane.* Similarly the voltage node 1.5 V is assumed an* effectively lossless low-impedance power plane.Vpwr pwr 0 DC=3.3Vgnd grnd 0 DC=0Xdriver1 input1 drv_out1 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver2 input2 drv_out2 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver3 input3 drv_out3 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf Xdriver4 input4 drv_out4 drv_pwr drv_gnd enable IO_buf

Xreceiver1 pwr rcv_in1 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver2 pwr rcv_in2 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver3 pwr rcv_in3 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf Xreceiver4 pwr rcv_in4 rcv_pwr rcv_gnd pwr IO_buf

Venable enable drv_gnd DC=0

Vinput1 input1 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput2 input2 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput3 input3 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)*Vinput4 input4 drv_gnd pul(0 3.3 0 100p 100p 7.4n 15n)Vinput4 input4 drv_gnd DC=0

Tdrv1 drv_bw1 grnd line_out1 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv1 rcv_bw1 grnd line_in1 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline1 line_out1 grnd line_in1 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Tdrv2 drv_bw2 grnd line_out2 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv2 rcv_bw2 grnd line_in2 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline2 line_out2 grnd line_in2 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Page 11: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 11

Cont..Tdrv3 drv_bw3 grnd line_out3 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv3 rcv_bw3 grnd line_in3 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline3 line_out3 grnd line_in3 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Tdrv4 drv_bw4 grnd line_out4 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5Trcv4 rcv_bw4 grnd line_in4 grnd Z0=40 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=3.3Tline4 line_out4 grnd line_in4 grnd Z0=50 TD='0.0254*0.180n' L=0.5

Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=0n

Lline_drv1 drv_bw1 drv_out1 L=9nLline_drv2 drv_bw2 drv_out2 L=9nLline_drv3 drv_bw3 drv_out3 L=9nLline_drv4 drv_bw4 drv_out4 L=9n

Lpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=9nLgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=15n

Lline_rcv1 rcv_bw1 rcv_in1 L=9nLline_rcv2 rcv_bw2 rcv_in2 L=9nLline_rcv3 rcv_bw3 rcv_in3 L=9nLline_rcv4 rcv_bw4 rcv_in4 L=9n

Lpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=9n

.print V(pwr,grnd) V(drv_pwr, drv_gnd) V(rcv_in1,grnd) V(rcv_in1, rcv_gnd)+ V(rcv_in4,grnd) V(rcv_in4, rcv_gnd) I(Vpwr) I(Vgnd).end

Page 12: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 12

4 Drivers Switching Receiver Input Vs Receiver Ground (rcv_gnd)

Case1

Case3

Page 13: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 13

4 Drivers Switching Receiver Input Vs System Ground (grnd)

Case1

Case3

Page 14: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 14

Quiet Line Receiver Input Vs Receiver Ground (rcv_gnd)

Case1

Case3

Page 15: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 15

Quiet Line Receiver Input Vs System Ground (grnd)

Case1

Case3

Page 16: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 16

Quiet Line Receiver Input Vs Receiver Ground (rcv_gnd)

Case1

Case3

Entire simulation Data

Page 17: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 17

Quiet Line Receiver Input Vs System Ground (grnd)

Case1

Case3

Entire simulation Data

Page 18: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 18

Quiet Line (with Mutual Inductance) Receiver Input Vs Receiver Ground (rcv_gnd)

Case1

Case3

Entire simulation Data

Page 19: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 19

Quiet Line(with mutual Ind.) Receiver Input Vs System Ground (grnd)

Case1

Case3

Entire simulation Data

Page 20: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 20

Mutual Inductance on Case 3 with 4 Drivers

……Lgnd_drv drv_gnd grnd L=0n

Lline_drv1 drv_out1 drv_bw1 L=9nLline_drv2 drv_out2 drv_bw2 L=9nLline_drv3 drv_out3 drv_bw3 L=9nLline_drv4 drv_out4 drv_bw4 L=9n

Lpwr_drv drv_pwr pwr L=9n

K1 Lline_drv1 Lpwr_drv 0.476731295K2 Lline_drv2 Lpwr_drv 0.476731295K3 Lline_drv3 Lpwr_drv 0.476731295K4 Lline_drv4 Lpwr_drv 0.476731295

Lgnd_rcv rcv_gnd grnd L=15n

Lline_rcv1 rcv_bw1 rcv_in1 L=9nLline_rcv2 rcv_bw2 rcv_in2 L=9nLline_rcv3 rcv_bw3 rcv_in3 L=9nLline_rcv4 rcv_bw4 rcv_in4 L=9n

Lpwr_rcv rcv_pwr pwr L=9n……

Page 21: Ambrish Varma 1 Effect of Pin Parasitics on SSN Ambrish Varma akvarma@ncsu.edu 26 th September 2005.

Ambrish VarmaAmbrish Varma 21

Conclusions

►Case 1 and Case 3 are not similar.►Quiet Line analysis shows that more the number of

drivers, the more obvious the results get (even with Mutual Inductance).

►Also notable is that in case 3, we keep the inductance equivalent. In actual cases, inductances (or parasitics) need not add up. Hence this is more like ‘best case scenario’.


Recommended