11/21/18
1
Ambulatory assessment of volume status in patients with Heart Failure
Taiyeb M Khumri MDAssistant Professor of MedicineUniversity of Missouri at Kansas City
11/21/18
2
“No financial relationships to disclose.”
Disclosures:Prognostic significance of congestion
Sensitivity and specificity of clinical findings of heart failure
Biomarkers for assessment of volume status
Newer, device based methods of volume assessment
Objectives
11/21/18
3
What do we know about these patients that get hospitalized for HF?
ADHERE OPTIMIZE HF
Prior HF (%) 75 87
New onset HF (%) 25 13
Cardiogenic shock (%) 2 <1
LVEF <40% (%) 59 52
The majority of patients admitted with ADHF are known to the medical system
The main reason for hospitalization is congestion
Congestion
Hemodynamic congestion –• Contributes to progression of HF by
activating neurohormones, causing subendocardial ischaemia and remodeling of the LV
• Contributes to the cardio-renal syndrome
Clinical congestionCauses symptoms
European Journal of Heart Failure (2010) 12, 423–433
Clinical congestion is just the tip of the iceberg
11/21/18
4
Prognostic significance of congestion
In patients with HF, elevated JVP is independently
associated with adverse outcomes, including
progression of heart failure.N Engl J Med 2001; 345:574-81Am Heart J 2000;140:840-7
The ability to maintain freedom from congestion
identifies a population with good survival despite previous
class IV symptoms.
Prognostic significance of congestion
J Card Fail. 2016 Mar; 22(3): 182–189.
Elevated PCWP, rather than severely reduced CI is of prognostic significance
11/21/18
5
Prognostic significance of congestion
European Heart Journal (2013) 34, 835–843
Clinical congestion at discharge is associated with an increased risk of 30-day and overall all cause mortality and
heart failure hospitalization
Question
Right heart catheterization is considered to gold standard for assessment of intracardiac filling pressures.
The best way for assessment of congestion isA. Clinical examination and weightB. Right heart catheterizationC. EchocardiogramD. BNP
11/21/18
6
No improvement in survival or hospitalization Increased in hospital complications
Limitations of right heart catheterization
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1625-1633 J Heart Lung Transplant 2015;34:438–447
A significant proportion of patients are reclassified within a week of RHC and have
increased filling pressures
Limitations of right heart catheterization
11/21/18
7
Clinical assessment
JACC: Heart Failure Jul 2018, 6 (7) 543-551
The least sensitive physical finding for assessment of clinical congestion is
A. EdemaB. RalesC. JVPD. S3
Rales and pulmonary edema are found infrequently in patient with chronic heart failure due to exaggerated lymphatic drainage
Question
11/21/18
8
A combination of rales,edema, and elevated meanjugular venous pressurehas a 100% specificity forPCWP ≥ 22 mmHg
JAMA. 1989 Feb 10;261(6):884-8.J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22 :968 –974.
Circ Heart Fail 2008;1:170–177.
Clinical finding Sensitivity SpecificityDyspnea on exertion 66 52
Orthopnea ≥ 2 pillows 86 25
Edema 46 73
Rales ≥ 1/3 15 89
Resting JVD 70 79HJR 83 27
S3 73 42
Chest X ray
Pulm edema 60 73
Pleural effusion 43 79
Clinical assessment How to Estimate JVP
Estimate vertical height to sternal angle of Louis, then add 5
• A well-lit room
• Position the patient at an angle such thatthe meniscus of blood in the right jugularvein is brought into vision (usually an angleof 30 degrees to 45 degrees from thehorizontal)
4
4 + 5 = 9 cmRAP (mm Hg) = ¾ x
JVD (cm)
JAMA. 275(8):630-634, February 28, 1996
11/21/18
9
Bendopnea
• The patient bends forward while sitting in a chair and touching one’s feet with one's hands. The patient should not hold his or her breath. Then at 10-s intervals, the patient is asked of they are experiencing difficulty breathing.
• Bendopnea was considered present if dyspnea occurred within 30 s of bending
J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2014;2:24–31
Bendopnea was present in 28% subjects and median time to symptom onset was 8 seconds.
Benefit of Intensive weight and symptom monitoring
Monitoring of weight and symptoms do not reduce readmission or death
N Engl J Med 2010;363:2301-2309
11/21/18
10
The biologically active form of natriuretic peptide isA. BNPB. NTproBNP
BNP
Question
• Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are released from the heart in response to pressure and volume overload.
• 3 major NPs, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type NP
• BNP has minimal storage in granules; rather, it is synthesized and secreted in bursts
• BNP and NTproBNP levels are reasonably correlated, and either can be used
Natriuretic peptides
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2357–68
11/21/18
11
Prognostic significance of Natriuretic peptides
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:997—1003.Am Heart J 2006;152:828—34.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:1011—8.
• For BNP, a concentration of ∼125 pg/mL represents the inflection point for risk, while it is 1000 pg/mL for NT-proBNP.
• A biological variability of 25% for NT-proBNP and 40% for BNP is more to be expected
• Largest prognostic value relative to changes in NT-proBNP concentration is observed 2 weeks after a therapy change
Natriuretic peptide guided HF treatment
In high-risk patients with HFrEF, a strategy of NT-proBNP-guided therapy was not more effective than a usual care strategy in improving outcomes
JAMA. 2017;318(8):713-720
11/21/18
12
The Gheorghiade congestion score
European Journal of Heart Failure (2010) 12, 423–433
Implantable devices of assessment of volume status
• Implantable rhythm devices
• Implantable hemodynamic monitors (IHM)
11/21/18
13
Physiological Variable Clinical Relevance
First heart sound Associated with ventricular contraction status
Third heart sound Associated with early diastolic filling
Thoracic impedance Associated with fluid accumulation and pulmonary edema
Respiration rate Rapid shallow breathing patterns associated with shortness of breath
Ratio of respiration rate to tidal volume
Heart rate Indicator of cardiac status
Activity Global patient status and fatigue
Parameter CriterionFluid Index ≥60 ohm/daysAT/AF Duration ≥6 hours & not persistent AT/AFV. rate during AT/AF
AT/AF ≥24 hrs & V. ≥ 90 bpm
Patient Activity Avg. <1 hr over 1 weekNight Heart Rate ≥85 bpm for 7 consecutive daysHRV <60 ms for 7 consecutive daysCRT % Pacing < 90% for 5 of 7 daysShock(s) 1 or more shocks
OR Fluid Index ≥100 ohm/day
JACC 2010;55(17):1803-1810
JACC HF 2017;5:216–25
While data from rhythm devices can risk stratify
patients, there is no data to use them in guiding
treatment
11/21/18
14
Time course of decompensation
Intra-cardiac filling pressure increase predates symptoms of HF byA. Occurs at the same timeB. 24 hoursC. 7 daysD. 15-30 days
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:565–71
Intracardiac pressures can rise upto 2 weeks prior to HF decompensation
Question CardioMEMS
Lancet 2011; 377: 658–66
Use of IHM reduce rates of hospital admission for heart
failure in NYHA class III patients
11/21/18
15
Lancet 2016; 387: 453–61Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:935-944
Use of IHM
Has sustained reduction in HF hospitalization in NYHA III patients
Allows more uptitration of HF therapies
Has benefits in both HFrEG and HFpEF
CardioMEMS Summary• Congestion has significant prognostic implications and clinical congestion is only a tip of the
iceberg
• Clinical assessment of congestion has significant limitations and may be inadequate to reduce HF hospitalizations.
• Assessment of natriuretics peptides has diagnostic and prognostic significance but cannot be used to guide therapy
• There are a large variety of implantable cardiac devices which can be used to assess intravascular volume status
• IHM guided therapy reduced HF hospitalization in NYHA III HF patients with both HFpEF and HFrEF
11/21/18
16
Thank You