+ All Categories
Home > Documents > American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama...

American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama...

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: doreen-goodman
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing the loop on student learning) Ali Yazdi, Jefferson State Community College
Transcript
Page 1: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

American Association of Physics TeachersAlabama Section

April 5, 2014University of South Alabama

Mobile, AlabamaAre they Learning What we Teach?

(Closing the loop on student learning)Ali Yazdi, Jefferson State Community College

Page 2: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

SACS 2.5 (Part of Core Requirements)

The institution engages in ongoing, integrated and institution-wide researched based planning and

evaluation processes that:(3) Demonstrate the institution is effectively

accomplishing its mission.

Page 3: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Institutional Effectiveness is the extent to which an institution achieves its mission and goals.

Definition of Institutional Effectiveness

Page 4: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas:

3.3.1.1 Educational programs to include student

learning outcomes.

SACS 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness

Page 5: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

The focus of Institutional effectiveness has changed from

Instructor-focused teachingTo

Student-focused Learning

Page 6: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

What is student learning outcome?

Page 7: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

The knowledge, skills and abilities a student has attained

at the end (or as a result) ofhis or her engagement in a

particular set of highereducation experiences.

Learning Outcomes defined

Page 8: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Outcomes are expressed in terms of knowledge, skills, attitudes or values.

Page 9: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

• Specific• Measurable• Attainable• Realistic and Results-Oriented• Timely

SMART SLOs

Page 10: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

1.Learner-centered2.Key to the course/program mission3.Meaningful (to students and faculty)4.Measurable5.All of the above

Good learning outcomes are:

Page 11: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Turns colleges from being teacher-centered

to bestudent- and learning centered

Assessment

Page 12: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

1. Create written statements of measurable SLOs.2. Choose the evaluation tool.3. Set standards for levels of performance on each objective (Rubrics)4. Identify observable factors that provide the basis for assessing which level of performance has been achieved.5. Evaluate student performance, assemble data, and report results.6. Use results to improve student learning.

Process for measuring SLOs

Page 13: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Heidi Andrade

Rubrics have become popular with teachers as a means of communicating expectations for an assignment, providing focused feedback on works in progress, and grading final products. Although educators tend to define the word “rubric” in slightly different ways, Heidi Andrade’s commonly accepted definition is a document that articulates the expectations for an assignment by listing the criteria, or what counts, and describing levels of quality from excellent to poor.

Rubrics are often used to grade student work but they can serve another, more important, role as well: Rubrics can teach as well as evaluate. When used as part of a formative, student-centered approach to assessment, rubrics have the potential to help students develop understanding and skill, as well as make dependable judgments about the quality of their own work. Students should be able to use rubrics in many of the same ways that teachers use them—to clarify the standards for a quality performance, and to guide ongoing feedback about progress toward those standards.

What is a Rubric?

Page 14: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Rubrics consist of a collection of steps that initiated by the student to take her/him from a Real World problem to a sensible, correct solution. (It is sort of an ALGORITHM)

PHYSICS Problem Solving(Example of Rubrics)

Page 15: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

• Oral and written communication skills• Critical thinking skills• Mathematical problem-solving• Information literacy• Technological literacy• Social and interpersonal skills• Cultural/global/diversity studies

General Education outcomes

Page 16: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

If it is not documented then it did

not happen.

Documentation Rule

Page 17: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Learning Outcomes

Assessment

ImplementRubrics

Examining the results

MakingAdjustment

Closing the loop

Page 18: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

PHY 213S Assessment RubricDescription of Assessed Objective

3 2 1 0Physics approach

The physics approach is appropriate and complete

The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors

Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate

Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate

Specific Application of physics

The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete

The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors

Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors

Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors

Mathematical procedure

The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete

Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors

Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors

Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors

Logical progress

The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected

The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies

Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

Totals Instructor analysis:

Sample Rubric For Cal-Based PHYSICS I

Page 19: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

y   

 

 

 

Learning Outcome Number 1Solving Projectile Motion Problems

A1. Projectile Motion Question

53

A ball is projected from the origin with initial velocity vo , as shown at the right. The initial speed of the ball is 50 m/s. Assume that.g =10 m/s 2.

(a) Determine the x component of the initial velocity?

(b) Determine the y component of the initial velocity?  (c) Determine the acceleration in the x direction. Ignore air resistance. (d) Determine the acceleration in the y, direction. Ignore air resistance.  (e) Complete the table below indicating the position components and the velocity components at one-second time intervals beginning at time zero when the ball leaves the ground.

time (s) x velocity (m/s) x position (m) y velocity (m/s) y position (m)

0   0   0

1        

2        

3        

4        

5        

6        

7        

8        

(f)Determine the ball's velocity (magnitude and direction) at position A.(g)Determine the ball's velocity (magnitude and direction) at position B just before it hits the ground. 

A

B

Page 20: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Student learning Outcome #1 Solve projectile motion problems. 

  3 2 1 0Physics approach

The physics approach is appropriate and complete

The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors

Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate

Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate

Specific Application of physics

The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete

The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors

Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors

Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors

Mathematical procedure

The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete

Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors

Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors

Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors

Logical progress

The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected

The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies

Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

         

Number of students at each level by responses to the questions 

Question # 11

6 5 3 1

Instructor analysis: Even if 73% of responses are at levels 3 & 2, more examples of Projectile Motion should be worked out.

Page 21: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

2. If α=30 and β=70 , and M=5kg, determine the tension in string 2.

α β

M

1.A 5-kg hanging object is connected by a light, inextensible cord over a light, frictionless pulley to a 2.00-kg block that is sliding on a flat table. Taking the coefficient of kinetic friction as 0.3, find the tension in the string.

learning Outcome Number 2 State and apply Newton’s 2nd Law

Page 22: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Student learning Outcome #2 State and apply Newton's second law.

  3 2 1 0

Physics approach

The physics approach is appropriate and complete

The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors

Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate

Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate

Specific Application of physics

The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete

The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors

Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors

Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors

Mathematical procedure

The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete

Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors

Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors

Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors

Logical progress

The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected

The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies

Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

         

Number of students at each level by responses to the questions 

Question # 1 11 4 0 0

Question # 2 6 3 3 3

Instructor analysis: Solving problems of higher degree of difficulty should be more emphasized.

Page 23: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

1. A one-dimensional force is given as follows:

Find the Potential Energy Function for this force .       2. A one-dimensional Potential Energy Function is given as:   Find the magnitude of the force related to this Potential at x=2.  

Learning OUTCOME 3

Calculate Potential Energy and Force

xxFx 129 3

)(xU

423)( 24 xxxxU

Page 24: American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Student learning Outcome #3 Calculate potential energy and force.

  3 2 1 0Physics approach

The physics approach is appropriate and complete

The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors

Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate

Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate

Specific Application of physics

The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete

The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors

Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors

Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors

Mathematical procedure

The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete

Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors

Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors

Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors

Logical progress

The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected

The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies

Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent

         

Number of students at each level by responses to the questions 

Question # 6

8 6 0 1

Question # 7

11 4 0 0

Instructor analysis: Relationship between Potential Energy Function and Force is well understood.


Recommended