+ All Categories
Home > Documents > American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from...

American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from...

Date post: 15-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: darrell-jones
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
39
Transcript
Page 1: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 2: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 3: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

American Association of School Administrators•There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion in a behavioral plan or IEP.•Limits what can go in an IEP and it bans mechanical restraints-will mean students who have a history of explosive outbursts will be increasingly placed in more restrictive settings.•Relentlessly negative toward the good work of teachers and administrators across the country-it assumes implicit bad motives and behavior for educators.

Page 4: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 5: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Resources

Page 6: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 7: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Arizona Senate Bill 1197

Page 8: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Director of Special Education

Assistant Superintendent

Parent of a child with a disability

Institute for Human Development, NAU

Special Education Teacher

General Education Teacher

Director ESS, ADE

Psychologist

Parent Information Network Specialist, ADE

ADE Staff Support

Page 9: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Best practices for managing the behavior and discipline of students with disabilities

Create a positive school climateDirect teaching of clear expectationsConsistent and fair application of

rulesIdentify and manage areas for conflictTraining staff in methods of positive

behavior supportReduce school incidents requiring

more punitive reactions

Page 10: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Disciplinary actions which should be prohibited.

Restrict the use of crisis management techniques of restraint and/or seclusion to cases of imminent danger to student or to other persons. NOT FOR DISCIPLINE!!!!

Page 11: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Training for School Personnel

Proactive behavior management strategies

Crisis de-escalationNon-injurious crisis interventionDevelopment and implementation of

behavior intervention plans

Page 12: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Notice requirements to parents and school administrators

Report every instance to:‐ Parents‐ School Administration‐ Central Office Administration‐ LEA’s Governing Board

Use data ‐ Appropriate modifications to policy‐ Training ‐ Practice

Page 13: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Create a positive school climate through direct teaching of clear expectations for student behavior, consistent and fair application of rules, identifying and managing areas for conflict and training staff in methods of positive behavior supports for all students to result in the reduction of school incidents requiring more punitive reactions.

Page 14: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Provide educational and behavioral assessments and interventions (such as functional behavioral assessments and behavior plans), as well as mental/emotional health supports (such as counseling and social skills training) to all children who need them.

Page 15: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Train all staff in the use of positive behavior supports for student behavior and in preventive techniques for addressing challenging student behavior.

Train all school staff in de-escalation techniques.

If school policies allow for the use of seclusion and/or restraint during crisis management, train relevant school staff in the same use of the permitted strategies. Allow only personnel who maintain approval as a trainer by the training program to conduct such training.

Page 16: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Report every instance where crisis management actions have been used (regardless of the location) to the school and central office administration; and to the LEA’s governing board. Use the data to make appropriate modification to policy, training, and practice.

Page 17: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Strategies such as restraint and seclusion should be used only for crisis management, not as recurring behavior interventions.

Prohibit the use of corporal punishment, mechanical restraints and physical restraints that restrict the student’s ability to breathe and communicate (such as prone restraints).

Page 18: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Positive School Practices and Climate

Implement positive, evidence-based, safe, and timely plans and procedures‐ Proactive ‐ Comprehensive‐ Data-driven

Parents are well informed‐ Ready access to plan‐ Able to provide input

Page 19: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Tiered Intervention (RTI)

Positive school climateProvide small group direct instruction

regularlyProvide a range of individualized

interventions‐ FBA must identify triggers and

responses‐ BIP should be developed from FBA

Page 20: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Crisis Management Recommendations

Seclusion‐ Definitions‐ Policies and procedures‐ Prohibitions‐ Training ‐

Page 21: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Physical and Mechanical Restraints‐ Definitions‐ Policies and procedures‐ Prohibitions ‐ Training

Page 22: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Corporal punishment is prohibited

Page 23: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

As required by the statute, this report was distributed to all school districts and charter schools in the state along with information regarding the requirement that each governing board conduct a public meeting to review and consider the adoption, modification or rejection of the recommendations of the task force by June 30, 2010.

Page 24: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 25: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 26: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 27: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 28: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 29: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 30: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 31: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 32: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

  If restraint or seclusion are used, they do not impede the student’s ability to breath or communicate, (i.e., prone restraint). If restraint or seclusion are used, they are not out of proportion to the danger, age or physical condition of the student, If restraint or seclusion are used, parents are informed the same day of the incident,

Page 33: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 34: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 35: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.
Page 36: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

•Know what the bill states and what recommendations are proposed

•Read and know what board policies district has in place-match the current bill with the district’ policies.

Page 37: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Get involved with PBIS in your district or campus.

Follow the State PBIS Advisory Council Recommendations and Practices.

Look to see what your reporting mechanisms are for your district and are you keeping data.

Check to see if your school or district is putting any processes in place to keep kids safe.

Page 38: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Make sure your building uses Positive Behavior Intervention

Supports (PBIS).

Page 39: American Association of School Administrators There is no reason to prevent school officials from discussing the possible use of restraint or seclusion.

Thank You


Recommended