1 www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com infor@amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 717.731.8184 Phone 717.427-1621 Fax Stan Caterbone Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 July 9, 2006 DO I HAVE A RICO CLAIM?This is by far the most common question that I receive at www.Ricoact.com . There is no simple answer to this question because the answer depends upon the unique facts of each case.I have found, however, that a large percentage of potential RICO claims are undermined by the following considerations:?? A RICO claim cannot exist in the absence of criminal activity. The simplest way to put this concept is: no crime - no RICO violation. This rule applies even in the context of civil RICO claims. Every RICO claim must be based upon a violation of one of the crimes listed in 18 U.S.C. 1961(1). The RICO Act refers to such criminal activity as racketeering activity. RICO claims cannot be based upon breach of contract, broken promises, negligence, defective product design, failed business transactions, or any number of other factual scenarios that may give rise to other claims under the common law. This being said, a RICO claim can be based upon violations of the criminal mail and wire fraud statutes. The mail and wire fraud statutes are very broad. Some creative lawyers have succeeded in arguing that the mail and wire fraud statutes have been violated by fact patterns that superficially appear to give rise only to claims of negligence, breach of contract, and other actions giving rise to common law rights. If a RICO claim is based only upon violations of the mail or wire fraud statutes, however, courts are likely to subject the claims to stricter scrutiny. Courts look more favorably upon RICO claims based upon true criminal behavior, such as bribery, kickbacks, extortion, obstruction of justice, and clearly criminal schemes that are advanced by the use of the mails and wires. ?? RICO addresses long-term, not one-shot, criminal activity. Not only must a RICO claim be based upon criminal activity, but the criminal acts must constitute a "pattern" of criminal activity. A single criminal act, short-term criminal conduct, or criminal actions that bear no relationship to each other will not give rise to a RICO claim. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that criminal actions constitute a "pattern" only if they are related and continuous. In order to be "related," the criminal acts must involve the same victims, have the same methods of commission, involve the same participants, or be related in some other fashion. A pattern may be sufficiently continuous if the criminal actions occurred over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of indefinite duration. The former patterns are referred to as closed-ended patterns; the latter patterns are 2 referred to as open-ended patterns. Accordingly, even if you have been injured by a criminal act, you will not have a RICO claim unless that criminal act is part of a larger pattern of criminal activity. ?? Your claim may be barred by the statute of limitations if you discovered or reasonably should have discovered your injury four or more years ago. Many people are mistaken that civil RICO claims are not subject to a statute of limitations. True, Congress failed to include a statute of limitations when it passed the RICO Act, but the United States Supreme Court has remedied that oversight and imposed a four-year statute of limitations on all civil RICO claims. Civil Rico's statute of limitations begins to run when the victim discovers or reasonably should have discovered its injury. Many people also believe that the statute of limitations is reset every time a new criminal act is committed - this is not true. Once a victim is aware or should be aware of its injury, the victim has four years to discover the remaining elements of its claim and bring suit. A victim cannot sit on its rights and refrain from filing suit in the face of known injuries. That being said, however, there are several equitable doctrines that may toll or suspend the running of the statute of limitations. If a defendant fraudulently conceals facts that are essential to the victim's ability to purse its rights, the running of the statute of limitations may be tolled. In addition, acts of duress, such as "if you sue me, I'll kill you," may toll the running of the statute of limitations. All tolling doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the circumstances, to bar the victim's claims on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations. Also, if a defendant engages in a new pattern of rackeeting, that causes new and independent injuries, a new limitations period may apply to those new and independent injuries. Of course, these are merely general considerations. Consult with an attorney to determine whether the facts of your particular case give rise to a RICO claim. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Plaintiff v.No. 05-CV-2288 LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON,MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT,AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT,COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK (LC. MELLON BANK), SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT,LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, FULTON BANK Defendant PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO FULTON BANKS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE HONORABLE MARY A. McLAUGHLIN FULTON BANK RESPONSE Defendant,FultonBank,byandthroughitsattorneys,BarleySnyder,LLC,herebyfilesthe following Response in opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin: On or about June 2,2006, Plaintiff filed a Motion requesting an ex parte meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin "to discuss the problems of preceding, this actionwithoutobstructionofjustice;andtoamendtheoriginalcomplaintasdiscussed previously." See Plaintiffs Motion. However, Plaintiff provides no justification whatsoever for his request for an ex parte meeting with the Court. Rather, Plaintiff apparently labors under the false assumption that by proceeding pro sehe is absolved of all responsibility to comply with the rules. Such is not the case. The fact that Plaintiff decided to be his own lawyer does notexcusehimfromfollowingtherulesofcivilprocedureorentitlehimtoanyparticular ConfidentialPage 26/12/2006 advantage for lack of legal training. "The right of self-representation is not a license to abuse thedignityofthecourtroom.Neitherisitalicensenottocomplywithrelevantrulesof proceduralandsubstantivelaw."Farettav.California,422U.S.806,834n.46,95S.Ct. 2525,2541 n. 46,45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). In the instant case, Plaintiff has no greater right to be heard than he would have if he were represented by counsel. As a pro se litigant, Plaintiff, in essence, stands in the place of an attorney. Plaintiffs requestforanexpartemeetingwiththeCourtinthiscaseviolatesRule 3.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct because it is clear that Plaintiff seeks to influence theCourtwithhisversionofevents,withoutprovidingdefensecounselanyopportunityto respond.'SinceanexpartemeetingwiththeCourtwouldviolatetheRulesofProfessional ConductandprovidePlaintiffanunfairadvantageoverDefendants,Plaintiffsrequestfor such a meeting should be refused. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ThefollowingiscopyofanAffidavitthatwasfiledonJanuary31,1998inthechambersof HonorableStewartDalzellinadesperateattemptfordueprocessoftheissuescontained herein.InNovemberof1997thePLAINTIFFsoughtthecounselofMs.ChristinaRainville whileemployedbythefirmofSchnader,Harrison,SegalandLewis.Thiswasthelast attempt by the PLAINTIFF of seeking competent legal counsel.Ms. Rainville acknowledged andcommunicatedtothePLAINTIFFthatthefirmhadbarredherfromrepresentingany additional clients from Lancaster County shortly after the PLAINTIFFs solicitation; which she hadplentyofsolicitationsfromotherpotentialLancasterCountyclients.Inthedocument titledPlaintiffFindingofFactsitisclearlydocumentedthatthePLAINTIFFdidattemptto solicitandretainseveralcompetentlawyerssince1987,allofwhodisplayedconflictsof interests,andsomewentsofarastoviolaterulesofethicsconcerningclient/attorney privilege.PLAINTIFFs filing as Pro Se Litigant was the only alternative available that would protect and preserve the PLAINTIFFs legal standing and right to due process.The following excerptfromtheAffidavitwilldemonstratetothecourtafactualaccountoftheeventsthat precludedandprovidedthePlaintiffthelegalstandingtofiletheoriginalcomplaintonMay 16, 2005. ConfidentialPage 36/12/2006 AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL I,StanleyJ.Caterbonebeingdulyswornaccordingtolaw,makethefollowingaffidavit concerningtheyearsduringwhichIwasmaliciouslyandpurposefullymentallyabused, subjectedtoamassivearrayofprosecutorialmisconduct,whileenduringanexhaustive fightforthesovereigntyofmyconstitutionalrights,shareholderrights,civilliberties,and right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting thedireconsequencesofthiscomplaint.Theseallegationsaresubstantiatedthrougha preponderanceofevidenceincludingbutnotlimitedtoover10,000documents,over50 hoursofrecordedconversations,transcripts,andarchivedonseveraldigitalmediums.A FindingsofFactsisattachedherewithprovidingmeritsandthefactspertainingtothis affidavit.Theseissuesandincidentsidentifiedhereinhaveattemptedtoconcealmy disclosuresofInternationalSignal&Control,Plc.However,themeritsoftheviolations contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy. Theplaintiffproteststhecourtsforallremedialactionsmandatedbylaw.Financial considerations would exceed $1 million. TheseviolationsbeganonJune23,1987whileIwasaresidentandbusinessownerin LancasterCounty,Pennsylvania,andhavecontinuedtothepresent.Theseissuesarea directconsequenceofmypublicdisclosureoffraudwithinInternationalSignal&Control, Plc., of County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my interests in InternationalSignal&Control.,Plc..Iwillalsoproveintentionalundoinfluenceagainst familyandfriendstowardscompromisingthecredibilityofmyself,withmaliciousandself-serving accusations of insanity.I conclude that the courts must provide me with fair accesstothelaw,andmostcertainly,theprocessmustvoidanytechnical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the conclusions.Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution. ConfidentialPage 46/12/2006 1. Theactivitiescontainedhereinmayraisetheargumentoffairdisclosureregardingthe scope of law pertaining to issues and activities compromising the National Security of the UnitedStates.ThePlaintiffwillsuccessfullyarguethatduetothecriminalrecordof International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by virtue that said activities posed a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States.; the plaintiff will argue thathispublicallegationsofmisconductwithintheoperationsofInternationalSignal& Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ;demonstrated actions were proven to protect the National Security of the United States.. The activities of International Signal & Control, Pls., placed American troops in harms way.The plaintiffs actions should have taken the AmericantroopsoutofharmswaycausingtheactivitiesoftheInternationalSignal& Control, Plc., to cease and desist. . AllactivitiescontainedhereinhavegreatlycompromisedtheNationalSecurityofthe United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiffs intent and motiveofprotectingtherightsofhisfellowcitizens.Hadtheplaintiffbeenprotected underthelaw,andsubsequentlyhadthelawenforcementcommunityofthe Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United Statestroopsmayhavebeentakenoutofharmsway,asadirectresultofceasingthe operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., in as early as 1987. 2.Theplaintiffwillsuccessfullyprovethatthefollowingactivitiesandtheprosecutorial misconductweredirectedatintimidatingtheplaintifffromcontinuinghispublic disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,.On June 23, 1998, International Signal & Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger withFerrantiInternational,ofEngland.Suchdisclosuresthreatenedtheintegrityof InternationalSignal&Controlsorganization,andMr.JamesGuerinhimself,, consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if such disclosures providedanyreasontoquestiontheintegrityofthetransaction,whichlaterbecamethe central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania. ConfidentialPage 56/12/2006 3. Theplaintiffwillprovethatundoinfluencewasalsoresponsiblefortheadverse consequences and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal holdings.Thedireconsequencesoftheplaintiffsfailedbusinessdealingswilldemonstrateand substantiatefinancialincentiveandmotive.Defendantsresponsibleforadministering undo influence and interference in the plaintiffs business and commercial enterprises had financial interests.The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority, Lancaster County had a great investment whos demise would facilitate grave consequences to its economicdevelopment..CommonwealthNationalBank(Mellon)wouldhaveless competition in the mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the lenderliabilitylaws.TheSteinmanEnterprises,Inc.,wouldlooseapioneerinthe informationtechnologiesindustries,andwouldprotectthepublicdomainfromtruthful disclosure.The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating common laws governing intellectual property rights. 4.Given the plaintiffs continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in June of 1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to the lawwiththeopportunityforanyandallremedialactionsrequiredunderthefederaland statestatutes.Theplaintiffwillsuccessfullyarguehisrightstothecourtstorightfully claimcivilactionswithregardstothetotalityoftheseactivities,sodescribedinthe following Findings of Facts, regardless of any statute of limitations.Given the plaintiffs genuineeffortsfordueprocesshasbeeninherentlyandmaliciouslyobstructed,the courtsmustprovidetheopportunityforanyandallremedialactionsdeservingtothe plaintiff.

5.Undercurrentlaws,theplaintiffsintellectualcapacityhasbeenexploitedasmeansof discrediting the plaintiffs disclosures and obstructing the plaintiffs right to due process of thelaw.Theplaintiffhasalwayshadtheproperrightsunderfederalandstatelawsto enter into contract.The logic and reason towards the plaintiffs activities and actions are a matter of record, demonstrated in the Findings of Facts, contained herein.. The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent emotional consequences to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.ConfidentialPage 66/12/2006 The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the direct result of the activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any mental deficiency the plaintiff may or may not have.The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all laws, irrespective of the plaintiffs alleged intellectual capacity.The plaintiff successfully argue that his mental capacity is of very little legal consequence, if any; other than in its malicious representations used to diminish the credibility of the plaintiff. 6.Theplaintiffwilldemonstratethatthefollowingincidentsofillegalprosecutionswere purposefullydirectedatintimidatingtheplaintifffromfurtherpublicdisclosureintothe activitiesofInternationalSignal&Control,Plc.,consequentlyobstructingtheplaintiffs accesstodueprocessofthelaw.Duetothefactthattheseactivitiestowhichthe plaintiffsperpetratorswereprotectingwereillegalactivities,theRICOstatuteswould apply. Tothisday,theplaintiffhasneverbeenconvictedofanycrimewiththeexceptionof2 speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial misconduct duringtheprosecutionsandactivitiesbeginningonJune23,1987andcontinuingto today. 7)Giventhepreponderanceofevidenceassociatedwiththisaffidavit,thecourtsmust concludethatInTheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtForTheEasternDistrictof Pennsylvania,FederalJudgeStuartDalzallsfindingsofApril14,1997,intheLisa Lambert case identifying acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit, nowdisclosesevidenceofabonafidepatternofprosecutorialmisconduct,inthe Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster.Criminal law must now determineifthesedisclosureswouldwarrantinvestigationsofapossiblecriminal enterprise.This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights.. Inthetruthfulnessofthisaffidavit,TheCommonwealthmustconcedeLisaMichelle Lamberttobalancethescalesofjustice,whichnootheractcouldaccomplish.The ConfidentialPage 76/12/2006 Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior matterofrestoringtheintegritytothecourts;byitsownadmissionofwrongdoing, assuring the peoples of its commitment to administer equalities of justice, not inequalities ofjustice.Balancingthescalesofjustice.Anythingless,wouldtakethefullscopeof jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitution of the United States.The plaintiff must be restored to whole. I was not defending the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert, but rather assaulting the judicial integrity of the Lancaster County Judicial System, from first-hand experience; andmakingthepointthatsuchconducteludeseverymajorstakeholderfromthetruth and justice prosecution and defense alike. ConfidentialPage 86/12/2006 PLAINTIFFS REPLY PLAINTIFFfiledtheoriginalcomplaintonMay16,2005prematurelyduetotheundo influenceandintimidationofseveralDEFENDANTSandotherpersons,entities,andor organizations; specifically the threat of a fabricated criminal prosecution.PLAINTIFF readily recognizedthedeficienciesinthefilingandthelackofaformalcomplaint(affidavitand findingoffactsonly),andhadrepeatedlyrequestedinformationandproceduralguidance from the Court during the course of time that had elapsed until the ORDER of the Honor on January 7, 2006.This had seemed especially difficult in light of the fact that the original filing wassealed.In1998PLAINTIFFstatedtothecourtsthefollowing:Iconcludethatthe courts must provide me with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the process mustvoidanytechnicaldeficienciesfoundinthisfilingasbeingmaterialtothe conclusions.Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution.PLAINTIFF acknowledges that the preceding statement contains an emotionalresponsetothesituation,andreadilyrequeststhattheCourtinterpretsthelegal intention and merits of the PLAINTIFFs request for a fair and reasonable access to the Court to hear and adjudicate the PLAINTIFFs complaint. PLAINTIFF has filed numerous formal complaints with the Federal Bureau of Investigations InternetCrimeComplaintCenter.Thosecomplaintsidentifiedas;I05120608348825 ; I05120804514805;andI06010506177009.Additionallycomplaintswerefiledwiththe SouthernRegionalPoliceDepartmentofConestoga,andtheLancasterCountyDistrict Attorneys Office with Chief Detective Michael J. Landis during the course of the last 2 years, where the PLAINTIFFS computer and online broadband connections was hacked.At times whenPLAINTIFFattemptedtosearchandfindRulesofCivilProcedure(Federaland Pennsylvania)andrelatedsubjectmatters,includingbutnotlimitedtotheeffectiveservice forDEFENDANTS,certainprovisionsweremissingandorreplacedwitherroneousand misinformation, thus resulting in an improper Certificate of Service and violation of the Rules of Civil Procedure relating to the Service of the complaint. Plaintiff deliberately provided no response to all previous Motions to Dismiss filed by several DEFENDANTSduetothevaguenessoftheORDERofJanuary7,2006instructingthe PLAINTIFF to only serve all DEFENDANTS with the complaint.That ORDER stated: IT IS ConfidentialPage 96/12/2006 HEREBYORDEREDthattheplaintiffshallservethesummonsandcomplaintonor beforeJ anuary25,2006.Iftheplaintiffdoesnotdoso,theCourtwilldismissthe complaint without prejudice. The Court will consider the plaintiff's request to amend the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and complaint are served. ThecourtprovidednotinstructionsordemandsofthePLAINTIFFtoproceedwithany additionalmotions,responses,andorrepliesaftertheeffectivelyservingtheoriginal complainttoalloftheDEFENDANTS.PLAINTIFFwillarguethatcontinuingwithlitigating theoriginalcomplaintbearsnopurpose,norservesanyinterestsoftheCourtinproviding thePLAINTIFFwithdueprocessandaccesstotheCourtsduetothefactthattheoriginal complaintwasnotappropriatelyformulatedtoensurethatthePLAINTIFFSallegationsof misconductandviolationsofFederalLawwereconstructedsufficientlyfortheCourt.PLAINTIFF,onJune2,2006,appropriatelyandformallyrequestedthatmeetingwiththe Court to amend the original complaint in the Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin. PLAINTIFFseeksnoadvantage,specialtreatment,norspecialconsiderationsfromthe Court.PLAINTIFFisseekingtheexpartemeetingforproceduralguidancetoamendthe originalcomplaintandtoaddresstheramificationsofthesealingofthecomplaintwith specialregardstoissuesofNationalSecurityanddocumentedandfactualthreatsonthe PLAINTIFFs life .The following is the excerpt from the PLAINTIFFs Finding of Facts: J une 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve some files concerning theISC cover-up.Upon driving north on Route 47 (thenormalroutetoLancaster),approximately10milesoutsidetheCapeMaycountyCourthouse, Stan Caterbone noticed a car following him closely. Suspicious, Stan Caterbone decreased his speed from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for the car to pass him. However, the car remained directly behind, adjustingthespeedaccordingly.Inanefforttoeludethecar,withoutraisingsuspicion,Stan Caterbonegraduallyincreasedhisspeed,whilealsoincreasingthedistancebetweenthecars, resultinginthelossofhistaillightstotheensuingvehicle-Becauseofthewindingroad,Stan Caterbonelookedforanabruptturn-off, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, byloosing sight of ConfidentialPage 106/12/2006 histaillights.Therewaslittleornotrafficontherouteduringtheearlymorninghours,andStan Caterbone stopped at an intersection, and noticed that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not visible in his rear view mirror, meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the ensuing vehicle. Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, Stan Caterbone noticed a narrow dirt road that lead intoafieldofsmalltrees,theperfectplacetositfortheensuingautotopasshim,unnoticed.The ensuingvehiclepulledtotheintersection,andcontinuednorthonroute47,inthedirectionof Lancaster.StanCaterbonesatinhisvehicleafewminutes,untilcontinuingonhistravel,northon Route 47. Approximately five (5) minutes later, a car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached Stan Caterbone, traveling south on the same road (2 lanes) As the two cars approached each other, and approximately 30 yards from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle drove directly into the lane of Stan Caterbone, with its high beams on, and continued straight for his vehicle, or what appeared to be a head-on-collision.StanCaterbonedroveoffofthebermoftheroad,missingalineoftreesby less than 12 inches (eluding a life threateningdisaster),andpassedthevehiclethatwasstillinthe northboundlane,headingsouth.StanCaterbone,shakingandsweatingfuriously,noticedthecars brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around, and began pursuing Stan Caterbone again. Stan Caterbone drove as fast as he could to Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to hide and loose the pursuing car. Stan Caterbone arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and again noticed a car sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of the New Danville PikeandPrinceStreets.UpondrivingwestonHersheyAvenue,StanCaterbonenoticedthecar following him. In an effort to identify the license plate, Stan Caterbone made a few turns in the area of HamiltonWatch,andfollowedthecarheadingnorthonS.WestEndAvenue.Thecarwasalate model,goldortan,CougarorpossiblyaBuickParkAvenue.StanCaterbonewatchedthecar increase his speed, and finally changed directions and proceeded to his residence, and parked a few blocks away, and walked through the woods, to his apartment in the Hershey Heritage complex. Stan Caterbonethenusedaflashlight,inordernottorevealhispresence,andreturnedtohisvehicle, sometime in the early morning, during daylight. ConfidentialPage 116/12/2006 WHEREFORE,PlaintiffStanleyJ.Caterbone/AdvancedMediaGrouprespectfullyrequests thatPlaintiffsMotionforExParteMeetingwiththeHonorableMaryA.McLaughlinbe affirmed. Respectfully submitted, Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant Dated: June 9, 2006 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-431-8184 717-427-1821 facsimile amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com . ConfidentialPage 126/12/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Plaintiff v.No. 05-CV-2288 LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON,MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT,AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT,COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK (LC. MELLON BANK), SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT,LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, FULTON BANK Defendant ORDER AND NOW, this - day of ,2006, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Ex Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin, and Fulton Bank's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the Motion is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: ________________________________ Mary A. McLaughlin, J. ConfidentialPage 136/12/2006 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Reply to Response to Motion for Ex Parte Meeting has been served this 12th day of June, 2006, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, upon: Michael Donahue Harbor Police Administration Building 9508 2nd Avenue Stone Harbor. NJ 08247 Stephen Basse, Esquire Stuart A. Weiss, Esquire 817 East Landis Avenue George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire Vineland, NJ 08360 Cozen O'Connor 1900 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 1 9103 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Reply to Response to Motion for Ex Parte Meeting has been served in person to the offices below on this 12th day of June ,2006,: Howard L. Kelin, Esquire George T. Brubaker, Esquire Kegel, Kelin, Almy & Grimm Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, LLP 24 North Lime Street 221 East Chestnut Street Lancaster, PA 17602 Lancaster, PA 17602 Sfephanie Carfley, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant Fulton Bank 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA 17602-2893 (717) 299-5201 Respectfully submitted, Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant Dated: June 9, 2006 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-431-8184 717-427-1821 facsimile amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com Fi naci al ManagementGroup,LTD. 1755 OregonPi ke La ma s t e r , PG17601 (717)569-5555 RobertKauffman,Pr es i dentMickelN.mrtlett,Execut i veV i c e Pr esi dentP.AlanLoss,BoardofDirectors R o b e r t Long,BoardofDi r ect or sPet er Peneros, Broker DefamationofChar act erSl ander MentalDuress Ma l i c eUnfai rCaTpet i t i on WrongfulI nt er f er e- with Busi-Relations WrongfulI n t e r f e r e m wi t hCont r act s.._- -.TrezpasstoPerssn Burgl ary TheftCri mi nal Mischief Invasi onofPri vacy TrezpasstoPersonal Pr oper t y Undoinf l u e mFraud Conspiracy E Mx z z l mn tBreachofCont r actExt or t i on Forgery Sb r h o l d e rFreeze-cutCornno-lthMt l 0 ~ 1 Bank Pennma r e-- Lancaster,PA176432 Wl l on Bank Pittsburg,PA ParentCarpany MikeWo l f , Executive VicePresidentofComnercialLending f ' w PEAJBLOS U( ; ATI ONS. :Defamation ofCharacter Slander MentalDuress M a l i eUnfairCocrpetition WrongfulI nt er f er e~z wi th BusinessRelations WrongfulInterference wi th Contracts Trespasst oPerson T M t..CriminalMischief Invasion ofPrivacy TrespasstoPersonalProperty Undoinf luenoe Fraud Conspiracy EntEzzlement Breach ofContract Extortion CkceSmith,Execxltive VicePresident Pete Wolfson,Sal-n Defamation ofCharacter Slander MentalIXlress Malice UnfairConpetition WrowfulInterferencewi th Busi-Relatiom WrowfulInterferencewi th Contracts T r e s p a s toPerson - .Theft C r i m i m lMischief Invasion ofPrivacy TrespasstoPersonalProperty Urdoinf luence Fraud ?Corqsiracy IEmSezzlement Breach ofContract Extortion Farrcers F1-tBank Ll t r t z, PA17512 PeteRichter,PkrmgerofLa-terShcpping CenterBranch ..GlennNel sn,President r/Aw ,455 PLLE%~.ICNS: Defamation ofCharacter Slaoder MentalDuress Mall03 Unfalr Corrpetr t i on WrongfulInterferencewl th Busi-Relations WrongfulInterference wl th Contracts T r e z p a s t o Pemn ,ary .Theft Invaslon ofPrlvacy Trespasst o PerzonalProperty --Undolnfluence Fraud Cor?zplracy Breach ofContract tExtortion .C' /- Hunllton Bank OregonPlke Lamaster,PA17601 ChrisIzzo,LoanOffi cer Corestates,CreditCardMni ni strator Defamation ofCharacter Slander MentalDuress Malice UnfairConpeti t i on WrongfulInterferencewi th BusinessRelations WrongfulInterferencewi th Contracts Tr-t o Person Tr-toPersonalPrcperty .Undoinf luence Fraud Coqi r acy Breach ofContract Extortion .F u l t o n Bank ?6tlO l d HickoryBr anch StorLa n c a s t e r . PA17601 Unf a i r Conpeti t i o nWrongful I n t e r f e r e n c e wi t h Bu s i n e s s R e l a t i o m WrongfulI n t e r f e r e - wi t h Co n t r a c t sU n d o i n f l u e m Fr aud C o m i r a c yErkezzlement Br eachofCo n t r a c tEx t o r t i o nCor Brc BerdettTml l n Hospital CapeNayCountyCourthouse StoneHarbor,NJ08247 SocialWorker Psychiatrist1 Psychiatrist 2 WEGAT IONS : Defamation ofCharacter Slarder k n t a lDuress Malice UnfalrCarpetrtlon WrongfulInterfere-wl th Busines Relatiow WrongfulInterference wi th Contracts TnzspasstoPerson -I r wa~l onofPrrvacy TrespasstoPercsmlProperty Undolnf luence Fraud Cowpiracy Breach ofContract ~orgsry Neg11gsnce AvalonPolice DeparWnt !Avalon,NJ08247 Offi cerDean Fat Aswrciate Defamation ofCharacter Slander MentalDuress Malice UnfairConpetition WrongfulInterferencewith BusinessRelations WrongfulInterferencewith Contracts TrespasstoPercan Burglary .Theft CriminalMi xhi efItwasion of Privacy Tr-toPersonal Property Undoinf l uenz Fraud Conspiracy En' &ezzlmnt Breach ofContract Extortion Forsew SharholderFreeze-out ml i gence k n h i mTowrshipPol i ceDeparbnent C i r c l e Drive Lancast er, PA17601 Det ect i veMathias Of f i cer 1 Of f i cer 2 Offi cer3 Of f i cer 4 DefamationofCharact er Sl ander k n t a l hresr Ma l i c eWrongfulI nt er f er encewi t hBusinessRel at i ons WrongfulI nt er f er e- wi t hCont r act s -T r e s p a s s toPerson 8urglat-y TheftCr i mi n a l Mischief InvasionofPri vacy Tr e s p a s s toPersonal Propert y 'jUndoinf l u e mConspiracy BreachofCont ractNegligznce Laneast erPol l ceDepartment W.Chest rwt St r e e tLaneast er , PA17602 DefamationofChar act erSl ander MentalDu- Malioe WrongfulI nt er f er encewi t hBusi nessRe l a t i o w WrongfulI nt er f er encewi t hCont r act sTr- to Person Undoinfluence Fraud Conspiracy BreachofCont r actNegligence JocshR c d a , Es q.301C l p k rBui l di ng 36E.K i y Street L a ma s t e r , PA17602 (717)397-5791 DefamationofCharact er Sl ander k n t a lDuress Malice UnfairConpeti t i on WrongfulInt erfere-wi t hBusi nessRel at i om WrongfulInt erfere-wi t hCont r act s Undoinfluence Fraud Col qri racy .Embezzlenmt BreachofCont ractExt or t i on Sh a r b l d e rFreeze-cutNe gl i s nc eLouS c ~ l l e r , Esq. Val or e, McAl l i st er , Wi x o r e l a n d , Gould, V e s p e r &Sctwartz Northfield, NJ (609)64-1111 MentalDuress Ma l i c eUnf ai r Gorrpet l t i on WrongfulI nt e r f e r e nc ewi t hBus i nes s Re l a t i onsWrongfulI nt e r f e r e nc e wi t hCont r a c t sUndoinf l uence Fraud Conspi racy m z z l e m e n tBreachof Cont r act.Ext or t i on Negl i gence D r . Wr s h a l l Levi r e, Effl DPA l a 1Ti l t onRoad Nor t hf i el d, NJ (653)646-2011 Def amt i onofChar act erSl anderMentalLXl resr Mal i ce Unf ai r Ca r pe t i t i on WrongfulI nt e r f e r e nc e wi t h Bus i nes s Relations WrongfulInterferencewi t hCont r a c t sT r e a s stoPerson I nvasi onofPr i vacy Undoinfl u e eFraud .C o mi r a c yF d x z z l m n tBreachofCont r a c tExt or t i on Neglige- United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?536747398298484...1 of 2 7/6/2006 2:32 PMA/R, CLOSED, STANDARDUnited States District CourtEastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-03689-ABIN RE: STANLEY L. CATERBONE Assigned to: HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODYRelated Case:2:06-cv-01538-ABCause: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BADate Filed: 07/15/2005Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 422 Bankruptcy Appeal (801)Jurisdiction: Federal QuestionAppellantSTANLEY CATERBONE represented by STANLEY CATERBONE 220 STONE HILL ROAD CONESTOGA, PA 19516 PRO SEV.Debtor-in-PossessSTANLEY CATERBONE represented by STANLEY CATERBONE (See above for address) PRO SETrusteeUNITED STATES TRUSTEE represented by UNITED STATES TRUSTEE OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE 833 CHESTNUT ST., STE. 500 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 PRO SEKEVIN CALLAHAN 833 CHESTNUT STREET SUITE 500 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 215-597-4411 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDate Filed # Docket Text11/14/2005 7 Letter from U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT re: received original record on 11/10/05. (afm, ) (Entered: 11/14/2005)United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?536747398298484...2 of 2 7/6/2006 2:32 PM11/07/2005 Original Bankruptcy Record returned to the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (afm, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005)10/06/2005 6 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REINSTATED IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT DEBTOR-APPELLANT COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DEBTORS SEEKING RELIEF UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE.. SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 10/5/05. 10/7/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 10/07/2005)10/03/2005 5 RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED by UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 COS) (afm, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)09/23/2005 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY OCTOBER 3, 2005, WHY IN LIGHT OF DEBTOR-APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (BKY. DOCKET #12) AND BRIEF (DOCKET #3), THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRPUTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 09/21/2005. 09/23/2005 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, ) (Entered: 09/23/2005)07/28/2005 3 BRIEF TO ORDER TO DISMISS ON 6/13/05 by STANLEY CATERBONE. (afm, ) (Entered: 07/29/2005)07/15/2005 2 Briefing Schedule 7/18/05 Entered and copies mailed. (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005)07/15/2005 1 Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY CATERBONE from the order of Bankruptcy Judge Thomas M. Twardowski. (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005)PACER Service CenterTransaction Receipt07/06/2006 14:31:03PACER Login:am3189 Client Code:Description:Docket ReportSearch Criteria:2:05-cv-03689-ABBillable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.08United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/framemenu.pl1 of 1 7/6/2006 2:40 PMQuery Reports Utilities LogoutUnited States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...1 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PMSUSPENSEUnited States District CourtEastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-02288-MAMCATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLINCause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil RightsDate Filed: 05/01/2005Jury Demand: DefendantNature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: OtherJurisdiction: Federal QuestionPlaintiffSTANLEY J. CATERBONE represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE 220 STONE HILL ROAD CONESTOGA, PA 17516 US PRO SEV.DefendantLANCASTER COUNTY PRISON TERMINATED: 06/13/2006represented by ROBERT W. HALLINGER APPEL & YOST LLP 33 NORTH DUKE ST LANCASTER, PA 17602 717-394-0521 Email: rhallinger@appelyost.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDefendantMANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT.represented by CHRISTOPHER S. UNDERHILL HARTMAN UNDERHILL & BRUBAKER LLP 221 E. CHESTNUT ST. LANCASTER, PA 17602-2782 717-299-7254 Fax: 717-299-3160 Email: chrisu@hublaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDefendantUnited States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...2 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PMSTONE HARBOR POLICE DEPT. TERMINATED: 06/13/2006DefendantAVALON POLICE EPT. TERMINATED: 06/13/2006represented by WALTER H. SWAYZE, III SEGAL, MCCAMBRIDGE, SINGER & MAHONEY 30 S. 17TH ST STE 1700 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 215-972-8015 Email: pswayze@smsm.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDPATRICIA BAXTER SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. UNITED PLAZA 30 SOUTH 17TH STREET SUITE 1700 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 215-399-2007 Email: pbaxter@smsm.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDefendantCOMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK i.e. MELLON BANKrepresented by GEORGE M. GOWEN, III COZEN O'CONNOR 1900 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 215-665-2000 Fax: 215-665-2013 Email: ggowen@cozen.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDSTUART A. WEISS COZEN O'CONNOR 1900 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 215-665-2000 Email: sweiss@cozen.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDefendantUnited States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...3 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PMSOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT. TERMINATED: 06/13/2006DefendantLANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. TERMINATED: 06/13/2006DefendantFULTON BANK represented by STEPHANIE CARFLEY BARLEY SNYDER SENFT & COHEN LLC 126 EAST KING ST LANCASTER, PA 17602-2832 TEL 717-299-5201 Email: scarfley@barley.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDDate Filed # Docket Text06/30/2006 36 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN. 7/3/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, AND E-MAILED.(sc, ) (Entered: 07/03/2006)06/30/2006 35 AFFIDAVIT of Howard Kelin by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)06/30/2006 34 AFFIDAVIT of Vincent Guarini by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)06/30/2006 33 Memorandum in Support re 32 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)06/30/2006 32 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON.Certificate of Service.(HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)06/19/2006 31 ORDER THAT TO THE THE EXTENT THAT PLAINTIFF REQUESTS LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN HIS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT, THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/19/06. 6/19/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(le, ) (Entered: United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...4 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PM06/19/2006)06/14/2006 30 REPLY to Fulton Bank's response to plff's motion for ex parte meeting with Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin, filed by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (gn, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006)06/13/2006 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF MELLON BANK, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DET AND FULTON BANK ARE GRANTED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS ALSO DISMISSED AS TO DEFTS SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, AVALON POLICE DEPT, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF TODAY'S DATE. FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLFF'S MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT IS DENIED AS MOOT.. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/13/06.6/14/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (lvj, ) (Entered: 06/14/2006)06/05/2006 28 RESPONSE to Motion re [26] MOTION for Ex Parte Meeting filed by FULTON BANK, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on 6/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 06/05/2006)06/02/2006 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re [26] MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT.. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 06/02/2006)06/01/2006 26 MOTION FOR A MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROBLEMS OF PRCEDING THIS ACTION WITHOUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE..(gn, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006)04/26/2006 25 NOTICE of Appearance by WALTER H. SWAYZE, III on behalf of AVALON POLICE EPT. with JURY DEMAND & CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (SWAYZE, WALTER) (Entered: 04/26/2006)04/26/2006 24 NOTICE of Appearance by PATRICIA BAXTER on behalf of AVALON POLICE EPT. with JURY DEMAND & CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (BAXTER, PATRICIA) (Entered: 04/26/2006)04/12/2006 23 ORDER THAT THE CASE SHALL BE PLACED IN CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL 5/11/06. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/11/06. ) 4/12/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 04/12/2006)04/10/2006 22 NOTICE by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE for continuance. (gn, ) (Entered: 04/10/2006)United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...5 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PM03/06/2006 21 Request for MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Be Granted filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., Certificate of Service. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) Modified on 3/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 03/06/2006)02/23/2006 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Memorandum of Law# 3 Certificate of Service)(WEISS, STUART) (Entered: 02/23/2006)02/09/2006 19 ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFT MELLON BANK FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER IS GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DEADLINE FOR MELLON'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED BY 14 DAYS. . SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 2/9/06.2/9/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (lvj, ) (Entered: 02/09/2006)02/09/2006 18 BRIEF in Support re 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FULTON BANK, Certificate of Service. (CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on 2/13/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/09/2006)02/09/2006 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FULTON BANK.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) (Entered: 02/09/2006)02/09/2006 16 Praecipe to Enter Appearance by FULTON BANK; Jury Demand, Certificate of Service. (CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on 2/9/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/09/2006)02/08/2006 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Memorandum of Law# 3 Certificate of Service)(GOWEN, GEORGE) (Entered: 02/08/2006)02/06/2006 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 13 Memorandum of Law in Support(UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)02/06/2006 13 Memorandum of Law in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT.. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)02/06/2006 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT..Brief, Affidavit, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)02/06/2006 11 Praecipe for Entry of Appearance by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., Certificate of Service. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) Modified on 2/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/06/2006)United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...6 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PM01/23/2006 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Avalon Police Dept. by certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Lancaster County Prison by certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank, N.A.) by certified mail (no green card attached). (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Stone Harbor Police Dept. by certified mail ( no green card attached) (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Manheim Township Police Dept. by certified mail ( no green card attached) (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served Summons and Complaint upon deft Lancaster County Sheriffs Dept by certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re Summons and Complaint was served upon Fulton Bank by certified mail (no green card attached). (gn, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/06/2006 3 ORDER THAT THE PLFF SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 1/25/06. IF THE PLFF DOES NOT DO SO, THE COURT WILL DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL CONSIDER THE PLFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND FOR A HEARING AFTER THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ARE SERVICED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLFF'S MOTION TO FILE THE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/5/06.) 1/9/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)05/16/2005 2 MOTION TO SEAL THE COMPLAINT, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)05/16/2005 Summons Issued as to defts' FULTON BANK, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPT., AVALON POLICE EPT., COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT., LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. Forwarded To: pro se on 5/16/05 (gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?855156895895408...7 of 7 7/6/2006 2:40 PM05/16/2005 1 COMPLAINT against defts' FULTON BANK, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPT., AVALON POLICE EPT., COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT., LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 916844.), filed by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)PACER Service CenterTransaction Receipt07/06/2006 14:35:36PACER Login:am3189 Client Code:Description:Docket ReportSearch Criteria:2:05-cv-02288-MAMBillable Pages:3 Cost: 0.24Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...1 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PMAPPEAL, FeeDueU.S. Bankruptcy CourtEastern District of Pennsylvania (Reading)Bankruptcy Petition #: 05-23059-refAssigned to: Judge Richard E. Fehling Chapter 11VoluntaryAsset Date Filed: 05/23/2005DebtorStanley J. Caterbone 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 SSN: xxx-xx-0959represented by Stanley J. Caterbone PRO SEU.S. TrusteeUnited States Trustee Office of the U.S. Trustee 833 Chestnut Street Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215) 597-4411represented by DAVE P. ADAMS USDOJ 833 Chestnut Street Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215) 597-4411 Email: dave.p.adams@usdoj.govFiling Date # Docket Text06/29/2006 66 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss Case, or Conversion of Case toChapter 7 Filed by United States Trustee (related document(s),60).**MATTER TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT ; US Trustee's Brief due 7/21/2006, Debtor's brief due 9/1/2006*** (P., Cathy) (Entered:06/29/2006)06/22/2006 65 Debtor's Objection/Answer to United States Trustee's Motion toDismiss or Convert Case to Chapter 7 ; Answer and Exhibits Filed byStanley J. Caterbone ***CD Disc received with pleading contains 2files, one of the files could not be opened and therefore unable to attach to entry*** (related document(s)60). (Attachments: # 1Exhibits A to E# 2 docket) (P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/23/2006)06/08/2006 64 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding Documents sent to US Trustee's Office. (P., Cathy) (Entered:06/08/2006)Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...2 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PM06/02/2006 63 BNC Certificate of Mailing. - U.S. Trustee Notice of Motion. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 61)). No. ofNotices: 33. Service Date 06/02/2006. (Admin.) (Entered:06/03/2006)05/30/2006 62 Certificate of Service of Motion to Convert/Dismiss and Notice Filed by DAVE P. ADAMS on behalf of United States Trustee (related document(s)61, 60). (ADAMS, DAVE) (Entered: 05/30/2006)05/30/2006 61 Notice of Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7, Motion to Dismiss Case60 Filed by United States Trustee. Hearing scheduled for 6/29/2006 at 11:00 AM at mad - Courtroom 1, Third Floor.(ADAMS, DAVE) (Entered: 05/30/2006)05/30/2006 60 Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount $15.00, Motionto Dismiss Case Filed by United States Trustee Represented by DAVE P. ADAMS (Counsel). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2Proposed Order) (ADAMS, DAVE) (Entered: 05/30/2006)05/03/2006 59 Order (copy) entered in District Court within Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered that the Appellant's motion for continuance is Denied as Moot (continuance previously granted). (P., Cathy) (Entered:05/23/2006)04/14/2006 58 Copy of Notice. NOTICE: The record on appeal from the Bankruptcy court in the above captioned case was entered on the docket in this office on April 11, 2006 and has been assigned to the Hon. Anita B. Brody. The following is the schedule for filing briefs with this office: 1) The appellant shall serve and file his brief within 15 days after entry of the appeal on the docket. 2) The appellee shall serve and file his brief within 15 days after service of the brief of the appellant. 3) The appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 10 days after service of the brief of the appellee. See original on case no. 06-cv-1538. (P.,Paul) (Entered: 04/17/2006)04/13/2006 57 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 55)). No. of Notices: 3. Service Date 04/13/2006.(Admin.) (Entered: 04/14/2006)04/13/2006 56 District Court Acknowledgement of receiving Bankruptcy Appeal Signed by Deputy Clerk Steve Tomas - Civil Action #06-1538 - Notice of Appeal of Order dated 2/23/2006 Granting Motion forRelief from Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga,PA (related document(s)44). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/13/2006)Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...3 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PM04/10/2006 55 Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Stay All Proceedings (Request for Continuance) because nothing is presently pending before this Court that would be subject to being stayed (related document #53) ; FURTHER ORDERED that any further or future motion or request to stay proceedings filed by Debtor shall specify precisely what proceeding or proceedings he is seeking to stay and shall forth in full all grounds for seeking such a stay. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/11/2006)04/10/2006 54 Transmission of Record on Appeal re Order dated 2/23/2006 Granting Motion for Relief from Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA to U.S. District Court (related documents 44 Notice ofAppeal, , ) (related document(s)44). (L., Eleanor) (Entered:04/10/2006)04/10/2006 53 Request for Continuance of Chapter 11 Case Filed by Stanley J.Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/10/2006)04/02/2006 52 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 51)). No. of Notices: 3. Service Date 04/02/2006.(Admin.) (Entered: 04/03/2006)03/31/2006 51 Order DENYING Debtor's (Second) Request for Hearing because nothing is pending before this Court on which a hearing might be held.(related document(s)50). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/31/2006)03/30/2006 50 Debtor's Request for Hearing with Bankruptcy Judge Filed by StanleyJ. Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/30/2006)03/23/2006 49 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 48)). No. of Notices: 3. Service Date 03/23/2006.(Admin.) (Entered: 03/24/2006)03/20/2006 48 Order DENYING Debtor's Request for Hearing because nothing is pending before this Court on which a hearing might be held. (relateddocument(s)47). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/21/2006)03/20/2006 47 Debtor Request for Hearing, and Certificate of Service thereto Filedby Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/20/2006)03/19/2006 46 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 45)). No. of Notices: 3. Service Date 03/19/2006.(Admin.) (Entered: 03/20/2006)03/17/2006 45 Attach PDF Document: Copy of Debtor's Notice of Appeal - RE:Order dated 2/23/2006 Granting Motion for Relief from StayLive Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...4 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PMRegarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA Filed byFulton Bank (related document(s)44). (P., Cathy) (Entered:03/17/2006)03/17/2006 44 Notice of Appeal - RE: Order dated 2/23/2006 Granting Motion for Relief from Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA Filed by Fulton Bank ; Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J.Caterbone (related document(s)42). Appellant Designation due by3/27/2006. Transmission of record on appeal to District Court Due Date:4/10/2006 ; copies to Judge Richard Fehling, Shawn Long, Esq, Unted States Trustee's Office, Debtor Stanley Caterbone. **FEEAMOUNT $255 NOT PAID**(P., Cathy) ***Modified on 3/20/2006, Exhibit A referenced in the notice of appeal was not included or attached to the pleading*** (P., Cathy). (Entered: 03/17/2006)02/25/2006 43 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 42)). No. of Notices: 4. Service Date 02/25/2006.(Admin.) (Entered: 02/26/2006)02/23/2006 42 Order Granting Motion for Relief from Stay Regarding Property 220Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA Filed by Fulton Bank Represented bySHAWN M. LONG (Related Doc # 31) (R., Sara) (Entered:02/23/2006)02/21/2006 Hearing Held on 31 Motion for Relief from Stay Filed by Fulton BankRepresented by SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel). Matter Taken UnderAdvisement. (S., Barbara) (Entered: 02/21/2006)02/10/2006 41 Monthly Operating Report for Filing for the month of January 2006Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/10/2006)02/02/2006 40 BNC Certificate of Mailing - Added Creditor Status Order. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 37)). No. ofNotices: 4. Service Date 02/02/2006. (Admin.) (Entered: 02/03/2006)02/02/2006 39 Debtor's Response to Motion of Fulton Bank for Relief From Stay ; Response and Exhibits thereto Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone (relateddocument(s)31). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-C# 2 Exhibits D-I# 3Exhibits J-M) (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/03/2006)02/02/2006 38 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone - RE: AmendedSchedules (related document(s)35). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/02/2006)01/31/2006 37 Order Entered that if a certificate of service of the amended schedules or amended matrix is not filed within 20 days from the date of this Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...5 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PMorder, the case will be closed without such amendment - RE: Amended Schedule F filed 1/30/2006. (P., Cathy) (Entered:01/31/2006)01/30/2006 36 Advanced Media Group Income Statements for the year 2005 Filed byStanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Reports) (P.,Cathy) (Entered: 01/31/2006)01/30/2006 35 Amended Schedule F (creditor added) Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number 20074148, Fee Amount $26.00 (P., Cathy) (Entered:01/31/2006)01/24/2006 33 Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice for Service of Papers, Receipt of Notices, and Inclusion on Notice List by SHAWN M. LONG Filed by SHAWN M. LONG on behalf of Fulton Bank.(LONG, SHAWN) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/24/2006 32 Notice of (related document(s): 31 Motion for Relief from Stay. FeeAmount $150,) Filed by Fulton Bank. Hearing scheduled for 2/21/2006 at 09:30 AM at mad - Courtroom 1, Third Floor. (LONG,SHAWN) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/24/2006 Receipt of Motion for Relief From Stay(05-23059-tmt) [motion,mrlfsty] ( 150.00) Filing Fee. Receipt number 4303314. Feeamount 150.00. (U.S. Treasury) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/24/2006 31 Motion for Relief from Stay. Fee Amount $150, Filed by Fulton BankRepresented by SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel). Objections due by2/8/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A and B- Note and Mortgage# 2Proposed Order # 3 Certification of Service and Notice) (LONG, SHAWN) (Entered: 01/24/2006)01/23/2006 34 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone - RE: Amended Schedules and Response to Creditor Status Order (relateddocument(s)27). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 01/26/2006)01/11/2006 30 BNC Certificate of Mailing - Added Creditor Status Order. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 29)). No. ofNotices: 24. Service Date 01/11/2006. (Admin.) (Entered:01/12/2006)01/09/2006 29 Order Entered that if a certificate of service of the amended schedules or amended matrix is not filed within 20 days from the date of this order, the case will be closed without such amendment (Regarding amendments filed 12/15/2005) (P., Cathy) (Entered: 01/09/2006)Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...6 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PM12/16/2005 28 Meeting of Creditors Held December 15, 2005. (ADAMS, DAVE)(Entered: 12/16/2005)12/15/2005 27 Amended Schedules F & G Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone ; ReceiptNumber 20074028, Fee Amount $26.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered:12/16/2005)12/15/2005 26 Response dated 12/14/2005 Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding HEMAP Appeal Hearing Request. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 12/16/2005)11/29/2005 25 Letter (dated 11/3/2005) Filed by Debtor Stanley J. Caterbone addressed to Department of Justice, US Trustee Office - RE: Summation on reason to file under chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.(P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/29/2005)11/29/2005 Receipt of Final Installment Payment. Receipt Number 20073978, Fee Amount $839.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/29/2005)11/18/2005 24 BNC Certificate of Mailing - Meeting of Creditors. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 23)). No. of Notices: 25.Service Date 11/18/2005. (Admin.) (Entered: 11/19/2005)11/16/2005 23 Meeting of Creditors . 341(a) meeting to be held on 12/15/2005 at12:30 PM at 3cnfrm - 3rd Floor Conference Room. Last day to oppose discharge or dischargeability is 2/13/2006. (E., Carol)(Entered: 11/16/2005)11/10/2005 22 BNC Certificate of Mailing - Hearing to Show Cause. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 20)). No. ofNotices: 18. Service Date 11/10/2005. (Admin.) (Entered:11/11/2005)11/10/2005 Appeal Returned from District Court - RE: Appeal Case # 05-CV-3689 regarding dismissal of case.(related document(s)12). (P.,Cathy) (Entered: 11/10/2005)11/09/2005 21 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 19)). No. of Notices: 27. Service Date 11/09/2005.(Admin.) (Entered: 11/10/2005)11/08/2005 20 Notice of Hearing to Show Cause why this case should not be Dismissed for Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay Filing Fees for Chapter 11 Voluntary Petition in the total amount of $839.00. Show Causehearing to be held on 12/1/2005 at 11:00 AM at mad - Courtroom 1, Third Floor. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/08/2005)Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...7 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PM10/07/2005 18 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 17)). No. of Notices: 2. Service Date 10/07/2005.(Admin.) (Entered: 10/08/2005)10/05/2005 19 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita B. Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal (CA-05-3689) Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required Document ; ORDERREINSTATING CASE TO US BANKRUPTCY COURT (related document(s)16). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/07/2005)10/05/2005 17 Attach PDF Document for BNC noticing: Copy of District CourtOrder to Show Cause (related document(s)16). (P., Cathy) (Entered:10/05/2005)09/21/2005 16 District Court Order entered within Civil Action # 05-CV-3689 Noticeof Appeal Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 OrderDismissing Case Re: Notice of Appeal, filed by Debtor Stanley J.Caterbone ; The Trustee is ORDERED to show cause by 10/3/2005 why this case should not be reinstated in the US Bankruptcy Court.(related document(s)12). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 09/30/2005)07/19/2005 15 District Court Acknowledgement of receiving Bankruptcy Appeal. Signed by Deputy Clerk: Steve Tomas ; Civil Action # 05-CV-3689 - RE: Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Case (related document(s)12). (P.,Cathy) (Entered: 07/19/2005)07/12/2005 14 Transmission of Record on Appeal to U.S. District Court (related documents 12 Notice of Appeal) (related document(s)12). (F., Anitra)(Entered: 07/14/2005)07/01/2005 13 Appellant Designation of Contents For Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Fact Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .(Attachments: # 1 Findings of Fact, 1983-1987# 2 Findings of Fact,1988-2003# 3 Findings of Fact, 2004-present)(P., Cathy) (Entered:07/01/2005)07/01/2005 Receipt Number 20073451, Fee Amount $255.00 - Notice of Appeal regarding Dismissal Order. (related document(s)12). (P., Cathy)(Entered: 07/01/2005)06/21/2005 12 Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required Documents (related document(s)9). Appellant Designation due by7/1/2005. Transmission of record on appeal to District Court DueLive Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...8 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PMDate:7/15/2005. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits) **$255.00 FILING FEENOT PAID** ; copies to Judge Thomas M. Twardowski, United States Trustee's Office, Debtor Stanley Caterbone. (P., Cathy)(Entered: 06/21/2005)06/21/2005 Matrix Filed. Number of pages filed: 1, Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .(P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/21/2005)06/21/2005 11 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J, Statement of Financial AffairsFiled by Stanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: # 1 Statement ofFinancial Affairs# 2 Finance Statements# 3 Matrix) (P., Cathy)(Entered: 06/21/2005)06/15/2005 10 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 9)). No. of Notices: 12. Service Date 06/15/2005.(Admin.) (Entered: 06/16/2005)06/13/2005 9 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required Documents. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)06/04/2005 8 BNC Certificate of Mailing - PDF Document. (related document(s) (Related Doc # 7)). No. of Notices: 2. Service Date 06/04/2005.(Admin.) (Entered: 06/05/2005)06/02/2005 7 Order Granting Application To Pay Filing Fees In Installments.(Related Doc # 4) ; Total amount due $839.00, First Installment Payment in the amount of $215 due by 8/1/2005, Second Installment Payment in the amount of $215.00 due by 8/30/2005, Third Installment Payment in the amount of $209.00 due by 9/15/2005, Final Installment Payment in the amount of $200.00 due by 9/20/2005. (P.,Cathy) (Entered: 06/02/2005)05/25/2005 6 BNC Certificate of Mailing - Voluntary Petition. Number of Notices Mailed: (related document(s) (Related Doc # 5)). No. of Notices: 2.Service Date 05/25/2005. (Admin.) (Entered: 05/26/2005)05/23/2005 5 Order Entered that unless the missing documents:20 Largest Unsecured Creditors due 6/7/2005. List of Equity Security Holders due 6/7/2005. Inventory of Property due 6/7/2005. Matrix due 6/7/2005. Schedules A-J due 6/7/2005. Statement of Financial Affairs due 6/7/2005. Summary of schedules due 6/7/2005 are filed within 15days of the date of the petition, or unless a timely request for an extension time is submitted, this case may be dismissed.. (P., Betty)(Entered: 05/23/2005)Live Database Area - Docket Report https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?748736903472216...9 of 9 7/8/2006 4:17 PM05/23/2005 4 Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments Filed by Stanley J.Caterbone Represented by Self(Counsel). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (P., Betty) (Entered: 05/23/2005)05/23/2005 3 Pro Se Statement Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Betty) (Entered:05/23/2005)05/23/2005 2 Statement of Social Security Number Received. Filed by Stanley J.Caterbone . (P., Betty) (Entered: 05/23/2005)05/23/2005 1 Chapter 11 Voluntary Petition. Receipt Number 0, Fee Amount $0.00Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone. 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors due6/7/2005. List of Equity Security Holders due 6/7/2005. Inventory of Property due 6/7/2005. Matrix due 6/7/2005. Schedules A-J due 6/7/2005. Statement of Financial Affairs due 6/7/2005. Summary of schedules due 6/7/2005. Incomplete Filings due by 6/7/2005. (P.,Betty) (Entered: 05/23/2005)PACER Service CenterTransaction Receipt07/08/2006 15:58:29PACER Login:am3189Client Code:Description:Docket ReportSearch Criteria:05-23059-ref Fil or Ent: filedDoc From: 0 Doc To: 99999999 Term: includedFormat: HTMLBillable Pages:5 Cost: 0.40United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?485379719275882...1 of 3 7/6/2006 2:29 PMSTANDARDUnited States District CourtEastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-01538-ABIN RE: CATERBONE Assigned to: HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODYRelated Case:2:05-cv-03689-ABCase in other court:U.S. Bankruptcy Court E.D. ofPennsylvania, 05-23059Cause: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BADate Filed: 04/11/2006Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 422 Bankruptcy Appeal (801)Jurisdiction: Federal QuestionAppellantSTANLEY J. CATERBONE represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE 220 STONE HILL ROAD CONESTOGA, PA 17516 US PRO SEV.AppelleeFULTON BANK represented by SHAWN M. LONG BARLEY SNYDER SENFT & COHEN 126 EAST KING STREET LANCASTER, PA 17602 717-399-1512 Email: slong@barley.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDV.Debtor-in-PossessSTANLEY J. CATERBONE represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (See above for address) PRO SETrusteeUNITED STATES TRUSTEE represented by UNITED STATES TRUSTEE 833 CHESTNUT STREET SUITE 500 United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?485379719275882...2 of 3 7/6/2006 2:29 PMPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 PRO SEDate Filed # Docket Text06/12/2006 8 Reply Brief of the Fulton Bank's Answer to Appeal, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (gn, ) (Entered: 06/12/2006)05/30/2006 7 Appellee's BRIEF by FULTON BANK. Appellant Reply Brief due by 6/6/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(LONG, SHAWN) (Entered: 05/30/2006)05/15/2006 6 ANSWER to Complaint by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gn, ) (Entered: 05/16/2006)05/03/2006 5 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED AS MOOT.SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 05/03/06.05/03/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED (ldb, ) (Entered: 05/03/2006)04/26/2006 4 MOTION FOR A (15) DAY CONTINUANCE OF THE COURT PROCEEDING, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE..(gn, ) (Entered: 04/26/2006)04/25/2006 3 ORDER - UPON CONSIDERATION OF APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR ANE EXTENSION OF TIME, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) THE REQUEST IS GRANTED; (2) THE APPELLANT SHALL SERVE AND FILE HIS BRIEF ON OR BEFORE MAY 15, 2006; (3) THE APPELLE SHALL SERVE AND FILE HIS BRIEF WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT; (4) THE APPELLANT MAY SERVE AND FILE A REPLY BRIEF WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE.. SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 4/24/2006. 4/25/2006 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL(mo, ) Modified on 4/28/2006 (mo, ). (Entered: 04/25/2006)04/11/2006 2 Briefing Schedule 4/12/06 Entered and copies mailed. (ss, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2006 (ss, ). (Entered: 04/12/2006)04/11/2006 1 Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY J. CATERBONE from the order of Bankruptcy Judge RICHARD E. FEHLING (No. 05-23059). (ss, ) (Entered: 04/12/2006)PACER Service CenterTransaction ReceiptUnited States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Dock... https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?485379719275882...3 of 3 7/6/2006 2:29 PM07/06/2006 14:28:25PACER Login:am3189 Client Code:Description:Docket ReportSearch Criteria:2:06-cv-01538-ABBillable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.08Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act - Wikipedia, t... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RICO_(law)1 of 4 7/9/2006 5:31 AMRacketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ActFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia(Redirected from RICO (law))The neutrality of this article or section may be compromised by "weasel words".Please see the relevant discussion on the talk pageThe Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO) is a United States federal law which provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct. 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. 1961 through 18 U.S.C. 1968.It has been speculated that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar, which featured a notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter of the bill, G. Robert Blakey, has refused to confirm or deny this.[1]Contents1 Summary2 RICO offenses and definitions3 Where RICO laws might be applied4 Famous cases5 References6 External linksSummaryUnder RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and 8 state crimeswithina 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages.When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before indictment.There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act - Wikipedia, t... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RICO_(law)2 of 4 7/9/2006 5:31 AMthe defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481RICO offenses and definitionsRacketeering activity means:Any act or threat involving gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year;Any act which is indictable under a wide variety of specific provisions of title 18 of the United States Code relating to bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery,racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, etc.Any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501 (c) (relating to embezzlement from union funds),Any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 ofthe Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States,Any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act,Any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain, orAny act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b (g)(5)(B);Pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment)after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity;Where RICO laws might be appliedAlthough some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies.The RICO laws can be alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or against individualsor corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts.These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of limitations has run out.Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act - Wikipedia, t... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RICO_(law)3 of 4 7/9/2006 5:31 AMFamous casesOn November 21, 1980, Frank "Funzi" Tieri was the first Cosa Nostra boss to be convicted under the RICO Act. In 1988, the owner of Florida Title Insurance, Inc. in Panama City, Florida sent copies of proposed qui.tam suit against 32 defendants with 12 Counts of Racketeering to the Justice Department as required, just to get them returned in a plain manila envelope with no cover letter regarding the RICO Act violations involving a competitor company, the IRS, with the IRS Agent threatening the life of Plaintiff on behalf of defendants and others. IRS Agent was found dead just days after being served by U.S. Marshals. Autopsy was conducted by Coroner later convicted of Murder. Case went before numerous Federal Judges in Northern District of Florida, who denied all motions including one for discovery conference, seizure of assets due to the defendant's failure to appear, 11th Circuit on Appeal with 15 minute argument (first hearing) with most spent trying to get the Government to have an independent autopsy of the IRS Agent and was denied access to Supreme Court due to minute error in spacing and Clerical Abuse of Discretion in pro.ce case.In 2002, the former minority owners of the Montral Expos baseball team filed charges under the RICO Act against Major League Baseball commissioner Bud Selig and former Expos owner Jeffrey Loria, claiming that Selig and Loria deliberately conspired to devalue the team for personal benefit in preparation for a move. If found guilty, Major League Baseball could have been found liable for up to $300 million in punitive damages. The case lasted for two years, successfully stalling the Expos' move to Washington or contraction during that time. It was eventually sent to arbitration and settled for an undisclosed sum, permitting the move to Washington to take place. This happened notably after Loria, now owner of the Florida Marlins, had received a significant financial boost after winning the World Series and Selig refused to permit the Expos to engage in September callups, effectively ending their chances at making the playoffs.RICO laws were cited in NOW v. Scheidler, a suit in which certain parties sought damages and an injunction against anti-abortion activists who physically block access to abortion clinics.In 2005, Tanya Andersen of Oregon responded to a lawsuit on behalf of Atlantic Records by in turn suing them under the RICO laws. Her suit alleges that RIAA members, in this particular case Atlantic, engaged in illegal computer trespass, extortion, and unfair trade practices under Oregon state law.On April 26, 2006 the Supreme Court heard Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams, which concerned what sort of corporations fell under the scope of RICO. Mohawk Industries had alledgely hired illegal alliens, in violation of RICO. The court will decide whether or not Mohawk Industries, along with recruiting agencies, constitutes an 'enterprise' that can be prosecuted under RICO.References^ RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December 2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26.1.External linksRICO Act from Cornell University's U. S. Code database(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records(http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregon-riaa-victim-fights-back-sues.html) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act"Categories: Articles with weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology | 1970 in Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act - Wikipedia, t... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RICO_(law)4 of 4 7/9/2006 5:31 AMlawThis page was last modified 15:49, 5 July 2006.All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, $''&ELNO. 05-2288 ORDER ---- AND NOW, this 5th day of January, ~FOG, upon-- --- consideration of the plaintiff'sDecember 17, 2005 letter to the Court requesting to amend the complaint and for a hearing, whereas the complaint was filed and summons were issued to the pro se plaintiff on May 16, 2005, and whereas the plaintiff has not served the summons and complaint within 120 days after filing the - . ..' . .., . . . . - ,complaint, as required by ~ i l e 4(m) ofthe ~ e h e r k ~ U l k of Civil - procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff shall serve the summons and complaint on or before January 25, 2006.If the plaintiff does not do so, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.The Court will consider the plaintiff'srequest to amend the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and complaint are served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to file the complaint under seal (Docket No. 2) is DENIED.A document in a civil action may be filed under seal only if the action is brought pursuant to a federal statute that prescribes the sealing of the record, or where good cause is established. +@i',,,, 5.1.5 (a)(1) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure; Pansv v. Borough of Stroudsburq, 23 F.3d 772, 786 ( 3dCir. 1994).The party seeking confidentiality may establish good cause by showing that disclosure will work a "clearly defined and serious injury" to that party; "broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples or articulated reasoning," are insufficient.Id. Even when judged by the less stringent standards by which courts judge p~se pleadings, the plaintiff has not brought suit under a statute that requires t h e - s U g _ o fthe-record, or +owngood cause for doing -- -so.The plaintiff alleges that several threats have been made on his life, but does not provide any facts to support this allegation, or explain how these alleged threats relate to his complaint. BY THE COURT: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY J. CATERBONECIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2288 v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, ET AL. MOTION Iherebyrequestameeting,exparte,withtheHonorableMaryA.McLaughlinasperthe ORDERofJanuary6th,2006.ThePLAINTIFFrequeststhemeetingtodiscussthe problems of preceding this action without obstruction of justice; and to amend the original complaint as discussed previously. DATED:May 30, 2006__________________________ Advanced Media Group Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 717-431-8184 717-421-1621 Facsimile EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B

J anuary 13, 2005 Stanley J . Caterbone (pro se) 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Honorable J udge Mary A. McLaughlinRoom #13614601 Market Street, Room 2609 Philadelphia, PA 19106-1748 Phone: (215) 597-7704 Fax: (215) 597-6390 600 Re: Case No. 05-2288 Honorable J udge Mary A. McLaughlin, I have received your court order of J anuary 5, and will proceed accordingly. In addition, I would like to inform you of a recent complaint IFCC Complaint Referral Report Complaint Number: I06010506177009. Please see attached. Respectfully, Stanley J . Caterbone Attachment:IFCC Complaint No. Cc:file Mr. Hugh Ward, Department of J ustice, Office of Trustee HonorableJ udgeThomasM.Twardowski,UnitedStatesBankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, $''&ELNO. 05-2288 ORDER ---- AND NOW, this 5th day of January, ~FOG, upon-- --- consideration of the plaintiff'sDecember 17, 2005 letter to the Court requesting to amend the complaint and for a hearing, whereas the complaint was filed and summons were issued to the pro se plaintiff on May 16, 2005, and whereas the plaintiff has not served the summons and complaint within 120 days after filing the - . ..' . .., . . . . - ,complaint, as required by ~ i l e 4(m) ofthe ~ e h e r k ~ U l k of Civil - procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff shall serve the summons and complaint on or before January 25, 2006.If the plaintiff does not do so, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.The Court will consider the plaintiff'srequest to amend the complaint and for a hearing after the summons and complaint are served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to file the complaint under seal (Docket No. 2) is DENIED.A document in a civil action may be filed under seal only if the action is brought pursuant to a federal statute that prescribes the sealing of the record, or where good cause is established. +@i',,,, 5.1.5 (a)(1) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure; Pansv v. Borough of Stroudsburq, 23 F.3d 772, 786 ( 3dCir. 1994).The party seeking confidentiality may establish good cause by showing that disclosure will work a "clearly defined and serious injury" to that party; "broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples or articulated reasoning," are insufficient.Id. Even when judged by the less stringent standards by which courts judge p~se pleadings, the plaintiff has not brought suit under a statute that requires t h e - s U g _ o fthe-record, or +owngood cause for doing -- -so.The plaintiff alleges that several threats have been made on his life, but does not provide any facts to support this allegation, or explain how these alleged threats relate to his complaint. BY THE COURT: IFCC COMPLAINT REFERRAL REPORT Complaint Number: I06010506177009 The following information was provided by the victim and will be forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement or regulatory agency. International Fraud Date of Complaint: 1/5/2006 6:17:08 AM Victim Information Business Name: Advanced Media Group Name: Stan CaterboneCaterbone DOB: 07/15/1958 Gender: M Phone #: 717-799-5915 Email: amgroup01@msn.com Address:220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA17516 Live in city limits: No County: Lancaster Country: USA Do you have pertinent documents in paper form? Yes Please indicate who your local law enforcement agency is: Southern Regional Police Department Please List the easiest way and most convenient time to contact you: cell phone, email, anytime Information about the Business that victimized you. Name:Gender: U Phone #:Current Email:Address: Country: USA Contact between you and the Person/company that victimized you. Type of Contact: Web Page Date of Contact: 01/30/2005 Total money lost on contact date: $2,200.00 Money lost in total: $0.00 Contact Information:On January 30 I had planned to visit Los Cabos, Mexico, for a business trip.I had used the Internet to locate the airport (PTO) for that destination to locate and book the necessary travel accommodations.PVR (Puerto Vallarta, Mexico) appeared on several Google searches as that airport.I accordingly booked flight itinerary and tickets for that trip. On January 31 I booked a flight from Houston Hobby airport to PVR (Continental Flight 1768, Seat 10D).I had some knowledge of the PTO system, having the national register for PTOs when I had my plane operating, the Piper Navajo Chieftain, in 1987.I had logged several flights, as far away as Atlanta, and booked it for charter to several clients. PVR was not, in fact, the airport for that destination.I had consumed an estimated $2,000 in expenses for that trip, and never was able to travel to Los Cabos as planned.I was denied a car rental after landing in PVR without any lodging accommodations.I had to spend 3 evenings in the PVR airport because of no lodging accommodations.The only accommodation I could find was at a price of $389.00 (Marriot Hotel) per night, well beyond my budget. I was not allowed fair access to certain return flights to Houston Hobby airport, and was in a constant state of intimidation by the agents at PVR that were under the employ of Continental Airlines.Continental Airlines made no attempt to remedy any of these problems, or make any attempt to accommodate my concerns or complaints. Southwest Airlines conveniently lost my only piece of carryon luggage from Philadelphia to Houston, on January 31 (Flight 1950/2646); which contained my only seasonal clothing, as well as legal and business files of the Advanced Media Group, and related computer hardware.I had to purchase shorts, t-shirts, and sandals, because of that mishap.Southwest Airlines made no real attempt to transport the lost baggage to PVR, where I needed it, and tried to use acts of intimidation during my filing of that claim in the Houston Hobby office of Southwest Airlines. (Southwest Airlines Lost Baggage Claim Report number 1000777444). I estimate that the lost monies for this mishap to be approximately $2,200. The airfare alone was $1500.Car rental fees (Avis) were approximately $170.Clothing and other related accessories were approximately $100.00.Food expenses were approximately $200. upon finally arriving back at the Philadelphia Airport, my battery had been tampered with, and my final trip home was extended an additional 3 hours, this was after the delay of another 4 hours by the Southwest flight from Orlando to Philadelphia. I had been randomly selected for private searches by the Homeland Security agents upon every stop, and in Houston, Texas, was accused by an inspection device (false posi