+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Amoco - Wellbore Stability

Amoco - Wellbore Stability

Date post: 18-Oct-2015
Category:
Upload: khodjamos
View: 53 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:

of 47

Transcript
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    1/47

    Lost Circulation

    Poor Hole Cleaning

    Hole Caving /Collapse

    WELLBORE

    STABILITY

    WELL OREST ILITY

    Formation

    Mud

    TensileFailure Active

    Tectonics

    ShearFailure

    PorePressure

    STABLE

    UNSTABLE

    Rock StrengthRock Stress

    Hole Enlargement

    Drill String Fatigue

    Tight hole /Stuck Pipe

    Drilling Handbook

    http://toc.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    2/47

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    2.0 BEFORE THE WELLBORE

    3.0 AFTER THE WELLBORE

    4.0 PROVIDING A STABLE WELLBORE

    APPENDIX

    1.1 Wellbore Stability Mission 21.2 Drilling Handbook Objectives 3

    2.1 Conditions 12.2 Earth Stress 42.3 Effective Stress 52.4 Rock Strength 6

    3.1 Near Wellbore Stress-State 13.2 Mechanical Stability 43.3 Chemical Stability 11

    4.1 Planning a Stable Wellbore 14.2 Warning Signs/Corrective Actions 3

    A-1 Leak-off TestsA-2 Lithology Factor (k)A-3 Wellbore Stress EquationsA-4 Nomenclature

    In Situ

    In Situ

    Wellbore Stability

    CONTENTS

    StartStart

    http://section1.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://section1.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    3/47

    Introduction

    Formation

    Mud

    TensileFailure Active

    Tectonics

    ShearFailure

    PorePressure

    STABLE

    UNSTABLE

    Rock StrengthRock Stress

    SandMWHigh

    MWLow Reaming

    TripSpeed

    ECD MobileSalt

    Shale StrikeSlip

    TensileFailure

    HoleCleaning

    ReverseFault

    TimeExposed

    - Wellbore Stability -Maintaining the Balance of

    Rock Stress and Rock Strength

    SECTION 1

    1.1 Wellbore Stability Mission

    1.2 Drilling Handbook Objectives

    StartStart TOCTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    4/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 1Section 1

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    Wellbore stability

    600 million to 1 billion dollars

    is the prevention of brittle failure or plastic deformationof the rock surrounding the wellbore due to mechanical stress or chemicalimbalance.

    Prior to drilling, the mechanical stresses in the formation are less than thestrength of the rock. The chemical action is also balanced, or occurring at arate relative to geologic time (millions of years). Rocks under this balancedor near-balanced state are stable.

    After drilling, the rock surrounding the wellbore undergoes changes intension, compression, and shear loads as the rock forming the core of thehole is removed. Chemical reactions also occur with exposure to the

    drilling fluid.Under these conditions, the rock surrounding the wellbore can becomeunstable, begin to deform, fracture, and cave into the wellbore or dissolveinto the drilling fluid.

    Excessive rock stress can collapse the hole resulting in stuck pipe. Hole-squeezing mobile formations produce tight hole problems and stuck pipe.Cavings from failing formation makes hole cleaning more difficult andincreases mud and cementing costs.

    Estimated cost to the drilling industry for hole stability problems rangefrom annually.

    StuckPipe

    HoleProblems

    Loss OfCirculation

    WellControl

    Relative Costs Of Unscheduled EventsCaused By Wellbore Stability Problems

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 1

    TOC

    Section 1

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    5/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 2Section 1

    1.1 Wellbore Stability Mission

    The mission of the Wellbore Stability Team is twofold.

    Minimize the "learningcurve" when developingnew reservoirs so thatoptimal well costs areobtained early on.

    Identify potential drillingproblems during the wellplanning stage so thatprevention and operationalplanning can be developedto minimize costs associatedwith wellbore stabilityproblems.

    Chemical Instability Mechanical Instability

    Tensile Shear

    FracturesLoss of Circulation

    CavingsTight HoleStuck Pipe

    Reactive Shale Overburden StressedGeopressured

    Hydro-PressuredUnconsolidated

    FracturedTectonics

    Failure Mechanisms

    Wellbore Stability Problems

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 1

    TOC

    Section 1

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    6/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 3Section 1

    Understanding the conditions that cause stability problems provides for:

    More effective planning.

    Earlier and easier detection of warning signs.

    Contingency plans to avoid the progression of the problem.

    GENERALCAUSESOF

    STABILITYPROBLEMS

    STABILITYPROLEMS

    COSTTOOPERATION

    RESULTINGCONDITIONS

    IncorrectMud

    IncorrectWellTrajectory

    PoorDrillin

    g

    Practices

    PoorWellPlan

    Reactiveshale

    ectiveshleExcessive

    WellborePressure

    xcessiveWellboreressure ExcessiveRoc

    kStressxcessive

    ock Stress

    Hole

    Cle

    anin

    g

    olelea

    ningHole

    Enlargem

    ent

    ole nlargementH

    oleC

    olla

    pse

    ol e oll apse

    WellControlell ontrolLostCir

    culationost irculationPoorl

    ogsoor losCementingProblems

    ementing roblemsStuckP ipetuck ipeDrillStringFatiguerill String Fatigue

    1.2 Handbook Objectives

    Identify and define wellbore stability problems.

    Suggest consistent terminology.

    Associate warning signs with stability problem.

    Suggest corrective actions.

    Provide the background for preventive planning.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 1

    TOC

    Section 1

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    7/47

    SECTION 2

    Before The Wellbore

    2.1 Conditions

    2.2 Earth Stress

    2.3 Effective Stress

    2.4 Rock Strength

    In Situ

    In Situ

    StartStart TOCTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://section1.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    8/47

    2. 0 BEFORE THE WELLBORE

    2.1 ConditionsIn Situ

    Porosity

    Porosityis the percent of void space within the rock.

    The rocks of sedimentary basins always exhibit some porosity. As porosityincreases, the percent of fluid volume increases while the rock matrixvolume decreases. Increasing porosity weakens the rock. Shale, forexample, will change from brittle rock to ductile clay with sufficient water

    content. The figure below shows typical porosity change with depth due tocompaction and cementation.

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 1Section 2

    Permeability

    Permeabilityis the ability of a rock to flow fluids; measured in units ofdarcies.

    Permeability acts to weaken the rock as the loss of water base mud filtratedissolves the grain-to-grain cement bond. Also, hydrostatic overbalance

    forces water filtrate to penetrate the pores of the rock; which also weakensthe rock.

    Shale

    Fluid FilledPores

    RockMatrix

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    10 20 30 40 50 60

    Porosity (%)

    Depth(ft)

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    9/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 2Section 2

    The figure below shows typical permeability changes relative to depth forshale and sandstone. Shales may have high porosity, but have very little

    permeability.

    Formation Pore Pressure -p

    Formation pore pressure is the pressure of the naturally occurring fluid(s) inthe pores of the rock.

    As long as the increase in overburden load from the rate of deposition doesnot exceed the rate at which fluid can escape from the pore, a fluidconnection exists from surface to the depth of interest. Pore pressure is thenequal to the hydrostatic pressure of formation water (normal pressure).

    is equal to the hydrostatic pressure offormation water at a vertical depth of interest.Normal formation pressure

    Permeability (Darcies)

    Sandstone

    Fluid FilledPores

    ConnectedPorosity

    RockMatrix

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    1 2 3 4

    SandstoneShale

    Depth(ft)

    Transition Shale

    Formation WaterMigrating to Surface

    Depth

    Pressure

    .465

    psi/ft

    Avera

    ge

    8,000'

    3720 psi

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    10/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 3Section 2

    Pore pressure of a permeable formation can be depleted below normal byproduction operations (subnormal pressure).

    is less than normal for the vertical depthof interest.Subnormal formation pressure

    If the fluid cannot escape the pore, pore pressure begins to increase at afaster-than-normal rate (abnormal pressure).

    is greater than normal for the vertical depthof interest.Abnormal formation pressure

    Depth

    Pressure

    Transition Shale

    Depleted Zone

    AbnormalPressure

    Sub normalPressure

    Normal TrendLineFormation WaterMigrating to Sand

    8,000'

    3720 psi

    Estimating Formation Pore Pressure

    Formation pore pressure prediction is a highly specialized process. Prior todrilling, qualitative geophysical methods are available to qualify the

    presence of abnormal pressure at an approximate depth. Offset logs alsohelp estimate pore pressure.

    Enhancements in geophysical interpretations have recently been made toquantify the value of abnormal pressure prior to spudding the well. Beforedevelopment of this quantitative method, only qualitative information was

    possible prior to drilling.

    While drilling, several MWD/LWD logs provide real time evaluation offormation pore pressure. "D" exponent plots can also indicate changes in

    pore pressure.

    Higher than normal porosity and sonic travel time ( t ) indicate abnormalpore pressure.

    c

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    11/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 4Section 2

    Weight of overlying rocks &water appliesstress to therock layer at avertical depthof interest

    ST SSSORIZONTL

    OVER

    BURD

    ENSTRES

    SOVER

    UREN STRES

    S

    Most formations are formed from a sedimentation/compaction geologichistory. Formations may vary significantly from the earth's surface to anydepth of interest. Shallow shales will be more porous and less dense thanshales at great depths.

    Typically a value of 1 psi/ft is attributed to the overburden gradient, but atshallow depths the actual value is much less and at greater depthssomewhat higher.

    A density log can be used to determine the weight of the overburden. In theabsence of a density log, the overburden stress may be estimated fromalternatives such as Eaton's variable density curve or the Wylie timeaverage equation using sonic travel time, bulk density and porosity.

    Estimating Overburden Stress

    2.2 Earth Stress

    - s

    In Situ

    Prior to drilling, subsurface rocks are exposed to a balanced or nearbalanced stress environment. The naturally occurring stress in place iscalled the stress. stress is normally compressive due to theweight of the overburden. For this reason, in rock mechanics compressivestress is defined to be positive.

    Overburden stress is the pressure exerted on a formation at a given depthdue to the total weight of the rocks and fluids above that depth.

    in situ In situ

    Overburden Stress v

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    12/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 5Section 2

    As the overburden squeezes the rock vertically, it pushes horizontally.Constraint by surrounding rock creates horizontal stress.

    In most drilling areas, the horizontal stresses are equal. When drillingnear massive structures such as salt domes or in tectonic areas, thehorizontal stresses will differ and are described as a minimum (s ) and a

    maximum (s ).

    The minimum horizontal stress (s ) is normally determined from leak-off

    tests. It is difficult to determine the maximum horizontal stress from fieldmeasurements. Its value can be estimated using rock mechanicsequations.

    Horizontal Stress - s sh , H

    h

    H

    h

    Estimating Horizontal Stress

    2.3 Effective Stress

    The rock matrix does not support the full load of overburden and horizontalstress. Part of the load is supported by the fluid in the pore (pore pressure).The net stress is the effective stress felt by the rock matrix. Effective stressis used in rock mechanics to determine the stability of the wellbore.

    The overburden stress that effectively stresses the rock matrix.

    = s -

    Effective Overburden Stress- v

    Effective Overburden Stress = Total Overburden Stress - Pore Pressure

    v v p

    Much like air pressure in a cartire supports the weight of thecar, fluid pressure in the poresupports a portion of theoverburden load.

    The remaining portion of over-burden stress is the loadeffectively stressing the rockmatrix.

    ROCK

    MATRIX

    RO KM TRIX

    5000 PSI

    Pore Pressure

    EffectiveOBS

    EffectiveOBS 4000psipsi

    9000 PSIOVERBURDEN

    PSIOVERBURDEN

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    13/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 6Section 2

    Effective Horizontal Stress- , h H

    Similarly, the effective horizontal stresses can be determined. Usually thehorizontal stresses are equal and the effective horizontal stress is equal tothe effective overburden stress times a lithology factor, . The lithologyfactor ( ) is equal to 1 for fluids but is less than 1 for more rigid materialsuch as formation rock.

    = = x

    kk

    k h H v

    2.4 Rock Strength

    Rock mechanics mechanical

    stress

    strain

    elastic deformation

    is the study of the behavior of subsurfacerocks.

    Core samples (removed from conditions) are usually tested incompression with specialized laboratory equipment. To better simulatesubsurface conditions, core samples tested are also subjected to a confining

    pressure ( ). The rock responds to the stress by changing in volume orform (deformation) or both. The change in the rock volume or form due tothe applied stress is called .

    Rocks subjected to compressive (+) or tensile (-) stress can go through threestages of strain deformation. In , the rock deforms asstress is applied but returns to its original shape as stress is relieved. Inelastic deformation, the strain is proportional to the stress (Hooke's Law).

    in situ

    In tectonically active areas, the horizontal stresses are not equal. Themaximum horizontal stresses will be higher, or lower depending on tectonicmovements, by the additional tectonic stresses, In these areas, the

    effective horizontal stresses are described by a maximum and minimumvalue.

    = x + and = x +

    In extreme tectonic environments, may be sufficient to make the

    horizontal stress higher than the vertical stress.

    t and t .

    k t k t

    t

    h H

    h H

    H

    h v H v

    1000 psi 900 psi 500 psi

    Water Putty RockNoncompressiblefluids like waterhave a k factor of 1.

    Stiffer materialslike putty have alower k factor (.7 -.9 for example.)

    Very stiffmaterials likeformation rockhave a much

    lower k factor(.37 is commonfor shale.)

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    14/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 7Section 2

    When applied stress reaches the elastic limit, the rock begins to exhibit. In plastic deformation, the rock only partially returnsto its original shape as stress is relieved. If continued stress is applied,fractures develop and the rock fails ( ).

    Rocks can fail in a brittle manner, usually under low confining stress, or in aductile manner under higher confining stress.

    Under compression rocks actually fail in - it is easier to slide rockgrains past each other than to crush them.

    plastic deformation

    ultimate failure

    shear

    Shear Strength and Shear Failure

    Stress(xpsi)

    1000

    10 2 3 4

    AxialLoad

    ElasticLimit

    ElasticDeformation

    PlasticDeformation

    Ultimate

    Failure

    Ultimate Strength

    Strain (% of Deformation)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    AxialLoad

    (CompressiveStress)

    ConfiningPressure

    Axial Load (psi)

    ConfiningPressure

    Shear PlaneShearFailure

    High confining pressure resists sliding on the shear plane and the rockappears stronger. If the confining pressure and axial load were equal, therewould be no shear stress on the rock and no shear failure.

    Equal stresses promote stability and unequal stresses promote shearstress and possible shear failure.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    15/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 8Section 2

    It is not possible to accurately reproduce the effects of pore pressure onrock strength when testing core samples from the field. In actual boreholeconditions, pore pressure exerts a force that tends to push the rock grainsapart. This is why the effective stress is used in rock mechanics whenapplied to wellbore stability studies.

    Cohesive StrengthBonded Grains (Cement)

    OverburdenStress (s )v

    Increased Pore PressureReduces the Effective Stress

    PorePressure

    HorizontalStress (s )h

    HorizontalStress (s )H

    Mean Effective Stress = v h H+ +

    3

    Rock mechanics uses failure models to predict wellbore stability. One suchmodel considers all three effective stresses to calculate the resultant shearstress. The "mean" effective stress is used by this model to describe thestress state of the rock.

    The failure model used in the illustrations (Mohr-Coulomb) neglects theintermediate stress and considers only the and effectivestress.The greatest shear stress on the rock occurs on the two-dimensional

    plane consisting of the greatest and least stress. The greatest/and or leaststress could be any of the three depending on environment and wellconditions.

    greatest least

    in situ

    Greatest Effective

    Stress ( , , or ) v h H

    Greatest Effective

    Stress ( , , or ) v h H

    Least Effective

    Stress ( , , or ) v h H

    (Intermediate stress actsperpendicular to t he figure)

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    16/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 9Section 2

    Shear

    Stress ( )

    S0

    ConfiningPressure ( )c

    CompressionPressure (Stress)That Fails Core

    Sample ( )f

    Failure Shear

    Stress From Test 1

    Failure ShearStress From Test 2 & 3

    < =

    Stress-State 1 Stress-State 2

    Stress-State 3

    Effective Compressive Stress ()

    The is defined as the shear stress that fails the rock. Thecoefficient of friction is also expressed in terms of an

    .

    = tan

    The cohesive strength (S ) and the angle of internal friction ( ) areobtained from conducting compression tests on core samples (orestimated from logs) from the field. Several tests on cores are necessaryto determine these values.

    The shaded area shown below indicates the "stress-state" of one such

    core sample at failure. The compression stress ( ) that fails the core

    sample (greatest stress) is plotted on the horzontal axis along with the

    confining pressure ( ) used for that test (least stress).

    shear strengthangle of internal

    friction ( )

    0

    f

    c

    The shear stress that fails the rock must overcome the(bonding together of the grains), and the frictional resistance between

    the grains ( The frictional resistance between the grains is the product

    of the and the effective compressive stress ( ).

    cohesive strength,S

    coefficient of friction ( )

    0

    ).

    Shear Stress = Cohesive Strength + Frictional Resistance

    = S +0

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    17/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 10Section 2

    The , thenecessary to fail the sample. Several tests at increasing confining

    pressures produce successive stress-states of increasing shear strength.

    The " " is approximated by the line giving the best fitto the maximum shear stress points on the failure plane from severalsuch tests. The equation for this line is given below.

    = S + tan

    A "shear strength line" or failure envelope shown below is producedfrom such core tests (a similar stability chart is used when considering

    the mean effective stress, ( + + ) / 3).

    The greatest and least effective stress on the wellbore are also calculatedusing stress, pore pressure, hole inclination, etc., and indicated onthe chart. If the stress-state produces a shear stress that falls beneath theshear strength line, the wellbore is stable.

    If the shear stress falls outside the stability envelope, the wellbore isunstable and formation failure will occur.

    higher the confining pressure greater the compressive stress

    in situ

    shear strength line

    0

    v h H

    Shear

    Stress,

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    S0

    Effective Compressive Stress,

    ShearS

    trength

    Line

    LeastEffective Stress

    GreatestEffective Stress

    Stress-State

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    18/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 11Section 2

    Time

    Geological processes have great lengths of time in which to operate.Although geologic time is impossible to duplicate in a laboratory, it is

    possible from experiments to make some deductions concerning theinfluence of time.

    One analysis of special interest to drilling operations is that of .

    Creep is a slow continuous deformation of rock with the passage of time,even though the stress may be above or below the elastic limit.

    creep

    Tensile Failure

    Tensile Failureresults from stresses that tend to pull the rock apart (tensilestress). Rocks exhibit very low tensile strength.

    TensileStress

    Tensile Stress Exceedsthe Tensile Strength and the Rock Fails

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 2

    TOC

    Section 2

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://section3.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    19/47

    SECTION 3

    After The Wellbore

    3.1 Near Wellbore Stress-State

    3.2 Mechanical Stability

    3.3 Chemical Stability

    StartStart TOCTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://section2.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    20/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 1Section 3

    OVER

    BURD

    EN STR

    ESSOVER

    UREN S

    TRESS

    STSSS ST

    SSSORIZONTLORIZONTL

    BeforeDrillingeforeDrilling AfterDrillingfterDrilling

    HYDR

    O

    STATIC

    PRESSU

    REHYDRO

    STTIPRESSU

    RE

    Radial

    Stress - r

    RadialStress r

    Axial

    Stress - z

    xialStress z

    Hoop

    Stress -

    HoopStress

    HSP

    As the hole is drilled, the support provided by the rock is removed andreplaced by hydrostatic pressure. This change alters the stresses. Thestress at any point on or near the wellbore can now be described in terms of:radial stress acting along the radius of the wellbore; hoop stress actingaround the circumference of the wellbore (tangential); axial stress acting

    parallel to the well path. These stresses are designated by ( , , ) and the

    additional shear stress components designated by ( , , ).

    These stresses are perpendicular to each other and for mathematicalconvenience, are used as a borehole coordinate system.

    in situ

    r z

    r rz z

    3.0 AFTER THE WELLBORE

    3.1 Near Wellbore Stress-State

    Before drilling, rock stress is described by the stresses; effectiveoverburden stress, effective minimum horizontal stress, and the effectivemaximum horizontal stress. These stresses are designated by ( , , ).

    in situ

    v h H

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    21/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 2Section 3

    Hoop Stress -

    Hoop stress is dependent upon wellbore pressure ( ), stress

    magnitude and orientation, pore pressure, and hole inclination anddirection. Wellbore pressure ( ) is directly related to mud weight/ECD.

    = [ & well parameters] - -

    For a vertical wellbore with equal horizontal stresses, hoop stress isdependent upon the mud weight and the magnitude of the horizontalstresses and is equally distributed around the wellbore.

    p in situ

    p

    in situ p p

    w

    w

    w

    EqualHorizontal

    Stresses

    A d eviated well creates of hoop stress around thewellbore due to the redistribution of the horizontal and vertical stresses.Hoop stress acting on a cross-section of the wellbore is maximum at thesides of the wellbore perpendicular to the maximum stress.

    The same is true when drilling a vertical well in an environment of

    unequal horizontal stress. Hoop stress is maximum at the side of thewellbore perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress.

    unequal distribution

    in situ

    Low Side of Hole

    High Side of HoleAdditional Components

    Of Stress From OverburdenAnd Horizontal Stresses

    MinimumHoop Stress

    MaximumHoop Stress

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    22/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 3Section 3

    Axial Stress - z

    Axial stress is oriented along the wellbore path and can be unequallydistributed around the wellbore. Axial stress is dependent upon;stress magnitude and orientation, pore pressure, and hole inclination anddirection. Axial stress is not directly affected by mud weight.

    = [ & well parameters] -

    For a vertical well with equal horizontal stress (s = s ), axial and vertical

    stress are the same. Axial stress in a deviated well is the resolution of theoverburden and horizontal stresses.

    in situ

    in situ pz

    h H

    Vertical Well -Equal Horizontal

    Stresses

    Axial Stress isOnly the Overburden

    Axial Stress isThe Resolution of

    Overburden and HorizontalStresses

    Deviated Well -Equal or Unequal

    Horizontal

    Radial Stress - r

    Radial stress is the difference in wellbore pressure and pore pressure andacts along the radius of the wellbore.

    Since wellbore and pore pressures both stem from fluid pressure actingequally in all directions, this pressure difference is acting perpendicular tothe wellbore wall, along the hole radius.

    = -

    Radial Stress = Wellbore Pressure - Pore Pressure

    r wp p

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    23/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 4Section 3

    3.2 Mechanical Stability

    Hoop ( ), radial ( ), and axial ( ) stress describe the near wellbore

    stress-state of the rock. is the of thesestresses in an effort to prevent shear or tensile rock failure.

    Normally the stresses are compressive and create shear stress within therock. The more equal these stresses, the more stable the rock.

    r z

    Mechanical stability management

    Axial - zHoop -

    Radial - r

    Hoop

    Radial

    ShearStress

    As shown by the right side drawing above, the radial stress is resistingshear caused by the hoop stress.

    Hoop, axial, and radial stress can be calculated and the greatest and least

    of the three indicated by a stress-state semicircle on the stability chart.

    Shear failure occurs if the stress-state falls outside of the stability envelop.Tensile failure occurs if the stress-state falls to the left of the shear stressaxis and exceeds the tensile strength of the rock.

    S0

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    LeastStress

    GreatestStress

    ShearStress

    Effective Compressive Stress

    Stress-State

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    24/47

    Mechanical stability is achieved by controlling the parameters that affecthoop, axial, and radial stress.

    MW/ECDMud Filter CakeWell Path - Inclination and AzimuthDrilling/Tripping Practices

    Unfavorable ConditionsAdverse FormationsConstrained Wellbore Trajectory

    Mechanical stability of the well is also impacted by drillingfluid/formation interaction. Chemical instability eventually results inmechanical failure of the rock in shear or tension.

    is also an important consideration. The longer the formation isexposed to the drilling mud, the more near-wellbore pore pressureincreases. The rock looses support provided by the mud weight.

    Controllable parameters:

    Uncontrollable parameters:

    Time

    In Situ

    Page - 5Section 3

    Wellbore Stability

    Whenever hoop or radial stress become tensile (negative), the rock isprone to fail in tension. Many unscheduled rig events are due to loss ofcirculation caused by tensile failure.

    Tensile Failure Due toNegative Hoop Stress

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    25/47

    S0

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    FailureEnvelope

    RadialStress

    HoopStress

    ShearStress

    Stress-State BeforeMW Decrease

    Stress-State AfterMW Decrease

    MW Decrease

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 6Section 3

    Effect of Mud Weight/ECD

    Mud weight, ECD, and pressure surges on the wellbore directly effecthoop and radial stress. An increase in MW decreases hoop stress andincreases radial stress. Similarly, a decrease in MW increases hoop stressand decreases radial stress. The result on wellbore stability is dependentupon the magnitude of the mud weight increase/decrease.

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    Radial Stress Hoop Stress

    ShearStress Stress-State Before

    MW Increase

    Stress-State AfterMW Increase

    Increase in MW

    Excessive Increase in MW

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    New Radial StressNew Hoop Stress

    ShearStress Stress-State Before

    MW Increase

    Stress-State AfterMW Increase

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    26/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 7Section 3

    Mud Filter Cake and Permeable Formations

    The filter cake plays an important role in stabilizing permeable formations.An ideal filter cake isolates the wellbore fluids from the pore fluids next tothe wellbore. This is important for hole stability and helps preventdifferential sticking as well.

    PermeableSand

    Pores

    WellboreWellbore

    Wellbore

    FilterCake

    pw p

    Ideal Filter Cake

    If there is no filter cake, the pore pressure near the wellbore increases tothe hydrostatic pressure; the effective radial stress is zero. Thesimultaneous decrease in effective hoop stress causes the stress-state tomove left in the stability envelope; decreasing the stability of theformation. An ideal filter cake helps provide for a stable wellbore.

    S0

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    FailureEnvelope

    RadialStress

    r= 0

    HoopStress

    ShearStress Stress-State After

    Filter Cake Failure

    Example of a Poor Filter Cake

    Stress-StateWith Good Filter Cake

    The chemical composition of the mud and permeability of the formationcontrol the filter cake quality and the time it takes to form.

    StrongThin

    FlexibleImpermeable

    Effective Compressive Stress

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    27/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 8

    S0

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    MinimumHoop Stress

    ShearStress

    Stress-State in VerticalHole Section

    Stress-State in HorizontalHole Section

    RadialStress

    MaximumHoop Stress

    Drilling a Horizontal Well

    Section 3

    Hole Inclination and Direction

    The inclination and direction of the wellbore greatly impacts the stabilityof the well. Unequal distribution of hoop and axial stress around thecircumference of the well tends to make the wellbore less stable.

    MinimumHoop Stress

    MaximumHoop Stress

    Increased Vertical Stressof the Overburden

    For Equal Horizontal Stress

    Drilling a horizontal well causes thehoop and axial stress distributionaround the wellbore to change.

    Before drilling from vertical, thehoop stress is equally distributed. Asangle increases to horizontal, thehoop stress on the high and low sideof the wellbore decreases, but thehoop increases greatly on the

    perpendicular sides.

    The change in the stress-state at the wellbore wall is shown below. Theradial stress remains fixed but the increasing hoop stress increases the

    stress-state.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    28/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 9Section 3

    Bottom-hole Temperature

    High bottom-hole-temperature wells can experience stability problems ashoop stress changes because of temperature differences between the mudand formation.

    If the mud is cooler than the formatio, it reduces the hoop stress as theformation is cooled. This reduction in hoop stress can prevent shear failureand stabilize the hole, if the hoop stress were high due to low mud weight.On the other hand, if the mud weight is too high and close to the fracturegradient, excessive cooling can lower the hoop stress and make it tensile.This could cause tensile failure or fracturing as it effectively lowers thefracture gradient.

    If the mud is hotter than the formation, exactly the opposite occurs as hoopstress is increased. This could promote spalling or shear failure.

    Consider what happens during a typical round-trip on a deep hightemperature well. During the trip, formation temperature returns to itsambient value. This causes the hoop stress to increase. When back on

    bottom and circulation resumes, the cooler mud traveling down thedrillstring reduces the temperature of the nearby formation, causing hoopstress to decrease.

    As the hot bottoms-up mud circulates past formations at shallower depths,hoop stress increases as the mud heats up the formations.

    These variations in hoop stress have the same effect as pressure surgesassociated with swabbing and surging and can cause both tensile and shearfailure downhole.

    Variations in Hoop Stress in a High Temperature Well

    S0

    ShearStr

    engthLi

    ne

    StabilityEnvelope

    Failure

    ShearStress

    RadialStress

    Changes in ShearStress on Formation

    Increased Hoop Stress While POOH

    Hoop Stress Prior to Trip

    Decrease in Hoop Stress While Circulating Bottoms-Up

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    29/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 10Section 3

    Impact of Mechanical Stability on the Wellbore

    Mechanical stability problems directly account for many unscheduled rigevents. Stability problems also effect overall drilling efficiency by alteringthe shape of the hole being drilled.

    Severe hole deformation occurs when extreme stress environmentsare penetrated. The drawing below is indicative of such drilling. Thedrawing is only a slice of the actual wellbore. Consider the path of a typicalwell, and consider this deformation over several thousand feet of open hole;it is easy to see the impact of such a wellbore on operations.

    in situ

    Maximum HorizontalStress Orientation

    Shear FailureZone (Breakouts)

    Tensile FailureZone

    Cavity

    OriginalHole Size

    Encroachment ofBrittle Sands

    Resulting Operational Problems Include:

    Stuck pipe, casing, logging tools, etc.

    Ineffective hole cleaning.

    Ledges and breakouts.

    High torque and severe slip-stick.

    Drillstring failures.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    30/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 11Section 3

    3.3 Chemical Stability

    is the control of the drilling fluid/rock interaction;usually most problematic when drilling shales.

    are fine grain sedimentary rocks with very low permeability andcomposed primarily of clay minerals (gumbo to shaly siltstone).

    Chemical stability

    Shales

    Clay platelets (2 micronsand less) settling to themud line.

    Mud at mud line, 60 - 90%porosity. Clay plateletsmaintain a water envelopeafter burial. Mud readilydeforms (much like

    pudding).

    Compaction drives porewater back to the sea.Platelets begin to contactforming pliable clay (muchlike putty).

    Further compaction,geologic time, andtemperature cements theclay platelets into shale(less than 20% porosity).

    Mud

    Clay

    Shale

    MuddyWater

    One factor that distinguishes shale from other rock is it's sensitivity to thewater component of drilling fluids. With time, shale/water interaction willdecrease the strength of the shale; making it more prone to mechanicalstability failure.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    31/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 12Section 3

    As shale is drilled, a sequence of events take place that can lead to thestressing, weakening, and eventual failure of the shale. Several parameters,described below, contribute to the chemical stability of shale.

    is the transport of fluid through shale due to pressuredifferential. Typically, wellbore hydrostatic pressure is greater thanformation fluid pressure. When exposed to a permeable formation, theliquid phase of the mud is "pushed" into the pore openings by the pressuredifferential.

    In a highly permeable sand, the flow rate of fluid loss is sufficient to form afilter cake that controls fluid loss. With shales, however, the filter cakecannot develop, since the permeability of a typical shale is much less thanthat of any filter cake. Also, the particle size of a typical filter cake is toolarge to plug the pore throats of shale (much like trying to plug a shakerscreen with beach balls).

    Advection

    Advection

    4500 psi

    Wellbore

    5000psi

    Wellboreps i

    PoreThroat

    Pore

    Fluid

    Shale

    PoreSpaces

    WellboreWellbore

    Wellbore

    Capillary Effects

    Drilling fluid must overcome capillary pressure to enter the pore throats ofshale. Capillary pressure, developed at the drilling fluid /pore fluidinterface, is dependent on several factors; pore throat radius, interfacialtension, and contact angle.

    When drilling water-wet shales with water base mud; surface tensionbetween the mud's water phase and the pore fluid is very low. Underfavorable salinity conditions, the water phase enters the pore throat.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    32/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 13Section 3

    Osmosis

    Pressure Diffusion

    Osmosis is caused by the imbalance of salt concentration between the mud'swater phase and the pore water. The salinity imbalance is separated byshale which acts as a semi-permeable membrane that allows the transport of

    water only. Water moves from low salinity to high salinity until the salinitydifference (chemical activity) is balanced.

    If the mud salinity is too low, water moves into the shale increasing the porepressure. As pore pressure increases, it has an adverse effect on stability.

    If the mud salinity is too high, pore water flows into the mud systemdehydrating the shale. As pore pressure decreases, effective hoop stressincreases also promoting shear failure.

    is the change in near-wellbore pore pressure relative totime. This occurs as overbalance and osmotic pressures drive the pressurefront through the pore throat, increasing pore fluid pressure away from thewall of the hole. This pore pressure penetration leads to a less stablecondition at and near the wellbore wall.

    Pressure diffusion

    4500 psi

    WBM

    5000psi

    WBMpsi

    PoreThroat

    PoreFluid

    4500 psi

    OBM

    5000psi

    OBMpsi

    PoreThroat

    PoreFluid

    SurfaceTension

    When drilling water-wet shales with oil base mud, the capillary pressure isvery high (i.e., 8000 to 10,000 psi) due to the large interfacial tension andextremely small pore throat radius. The high capillary pressure preventsentry of the oil phase as overbalance pressures are very low in comparison.However, if the salinity of the mud's water phase is not balanced with shalesalinity, water transfer through osmosis can still occur.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    33/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 14Section 3

    As pressure diffusion increases pore pressure near the wellbore, shearstrength of the rock is reduced. The time for pressure diffusion to impactshale may result in failure of a shale section exposed for several days.

    Time required for the pressure front to penetrate a given depth dependsprimarily on the permeability of the shale (connectivity of the pores) andthe pressure differential between the wellbore ( ) and pore pressure

    ( ).

    p in situ

    pw

    Swelling /Hydration

    Over geologic time, mud/clay solidifies into shale as overburden stressdrives off the water envelope (dehydration) and cements the platelets withthe minerals left behind after dehydration.

    After drilling, water enters the shale by advection and osmosis. Negativelycharged clay ions attract and hold the polar water. The increasing volumeof attached water produces a swelling stress that "wedges" the clay plateletsapart.

    Distance From Wellbore (Hole Diameters)

    Pressure

    p

    pw

    0 1 2

    Day 1

    Day 3

    Day 2

    Fluid Front

    Pore Channel

    Pressure Front

    In Situp

    Pressure( )

    ( )pw

    5000 psi

    Pore Throat

    4500 psi

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    34/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 15Section 3

    The swelling pressure and behavior of shales are directly related to the

    type and amount of clay minerals contained in the shale. Shales withhigh concentrations of negatively charged ions can produce very highswelling pressure (50,000 psi plus).

    Swelling pressure decreases the strength of the shale by destroying thenatural cement bond between the clay platelets. Brittle shale becomesductile and is pushed into the wellbore by the compressive hoop stressand the swelling stress.

    OVERBURDEN LOADVER URDENLO D

    PoreWater

    NaturalCement

    ShaleClay

    ClayPlatelets

    OVERBURDEN LOADVER URDEN LO D

    OVERBURDENLOADVER URDENLO D

    OVERBURDEN LOADVER URDENLO D

    ShaleWellbore(1 hour)

    Adsorbedwater SwellingStress

    Wellbore(1 Day)

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 3

    TOC

    Section 3

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://section4.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    35/47

    SECTION 4

    Providing A Stable Wellbore

    G

    4.1 Planning A Stable Wellbore

    4.2 Warning Signs /Corrective Action

    StartStart TOCTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://section3.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    36/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 1Section 4

    .

    4.0 PROVIDING A STABLE WELLBORE

    4.1 Planning A Stable Wellbore

    1

    2

    3

    = Greatest effective stress

    = Intermediate effective stress

    = Least effective stress

    v 1=

    h 3=

    H 2=

    NormalFault

    v

    = 3

    H 1=

    h= 2

    ReverseFault

    1. Potential Stability Indicators

    If the answer to any of the questions below is "yes", preventive measuresshould be taken.

    v 2=

    H 1=

    h 3=

    Strike-slip

    Fault

    Indications of tectonic activity in the area?

    Sudden pressure transition zones expected?o

    Adverse formations expected (reactive shale, unconsolidated or fracturedformations, abnormal or subnormally pressured zones, plastic formations?

    Is wellbore inclination greater than 30 ?o

    3. Determine Magnitude of In Situ Condition (s s s )

    Obtained from density logs of offset wells.

    Estimated by seismic and logs.

    Determined by LOT and/or logs.

    v , h , H

    Overburden - s

    Formation Pore Pressure -

    Minimum Horizontal Stress - s

    v

    h

    p

    2. Identify Stress Regime

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    37/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 2Section 4

    ..

    5. Research Offset Wells for Indications of Stability Problems

    Offset well data is invaluable information for identification of stabilityproblems in the field.

    Identify hole sections with stability symptoms.List the conditions that caused the stability problem.Identify similar problems in offset wells occurring at the same verticaldepth. Look for similarity in the conditions that caused the problem.List the drilling parameters effecting the problem (i.e., mud type and

    weight, hole angle, adverse formations, unusual drilling practices).

    CHEMICAL(Hole Enlargement /Hole Cleaning)

    CHEMICALHoleEnlargement /Hole Cleaning

    ME H NI L

    Reactive Shaleeactive Shale

    PLASTICDEFORMATION

    (Tight Hole /Casing Collapse)

    PLASTICDEFORMATION

    Tight Hole /Casing CollapseMobile Salt

    Mobile Shale

    Mobile Salt

    Mobile Shale

    TENSILEFAILURE

    (Lost Circulation)

    TENSILEFAILURE

    Lost CirculationExcessive

    WellborePressure

    ExcessiveWellborePressure

    COMPRESSIONALFAILURE

    (Hole Caving /Collapse)

    COMPRESSIONALFAILURE

    HoleCaving /CollapseOverburden Stress

    Tectonic Stress

    Geo-Pressured Shale

    Unconsolidated Formation

    Fractured Formation

    Overburden Stress

    Tectonic Stress

    Geo Pressured Shale

    Unconsolidated Formation

    Fractured Formation

    WELLBORE STABILITY PROBLEMSELLBORE STABILITY PROBLEMS

    4. Use Core Tests or Logs to Determine Formation Rock Strength

    Core Tests

    ShearStress

    StabilityEnvelope

    Unstableor Failure

    S0

    Effective Compressive Stress

    Logs

    Rock strength is estimated through correlations with sonic density logssince slow sonic velocity and high porosity generally relate to lower rockstrength.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    38/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 3Section 4

    4.2 Warning Signs and Corrective Action

    7. Avoiding Stability Problems

    Select an inhibitive mud for reactive formations.Casing points should allow for mud weight windows determinedfrom stability analysis.Maintain mud weight/ECD in stability window. Use down holeECD monitoring tools in critical wells.Optimize well trajectory based on drilling days vs. stability.

    Plan for effective hole cleaning and stuck pipe prevention.Follow defensive drilling practices. Control ROP, surge pressures.Train drilling team members..

    No single action can prevent stability problems. Wellbore stability must bemanaged by the controllable parameters.

    Mud type, composition and density.Drilling practices (minimize ECD, swab /surge pressures).

    Wellbore angle and direction.

    Chemical stability problems occur when reactive shales are drilled with anon-inhibitive drilling fluid. Chemical stability is time dependent anddifficult to quantify. The drilling fluid interaction results in shale hydrationand swelling which leads to shale falling into the wellbore causing holeenlargement and tight hole conditions.

    BHA balling and slow drilling, flow line plugging, soft mushycuttings on shaker.

    Smooth increases in torque/dragOverpull off slips, pump pressure increasing.Increases in mud parameters (mud weight, plastic viscosity, yield

    point, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and low gravity solids).

    Chemical Stability

    Warning Signs of Chemical Stability Problems

    6. Select Mud System and Determine Mud Weight Window

    Stability spreadsheets and analysis tools are used to determine the mudweight window for each hole section.

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    39/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 4Section 4

    Preventive /Corrective Measures

    Chemical stability problems are prevented by selecting proper mud type andcomposition. Initial corrective measures are to use suitable mud additives. Ifthe problem persists, replacing the existing mud with a more inhibitive mudmay be necessary.

    Addition of various salts (K, Na, Ca) to balance water activity.Addition of glycol to reduce chemical attraction of water to shale.Addition of various "coating" polymers (PHPA, etc.) to reducewater contact with shale.Use of oil base or synthetic oil base mud to exclude water contactand entry into shale.Minimize the open hole exposure time.

    Plan regular wiper trips.Minimize surge/swab pressures.Ensure adequate hydraulics for bit and hole cleaning.Maintain required mud properties.Use minimum mud weight, if possible.

    Mechanical Stability

    Mechanical instability is related to incorrect mud weight /ECD and/orwell trajectory. Too low mud weight can cause hole cavings or collapseresulting in stuck pipe. Too high mud weight /ECD can cause excessive

    fluid losses to the formation or total loss of returns.

    Large size and volume of cavings over shakers.Erratic increase in torque/drag.Hole fill on connections or trips.Stuck pipe by hole pack-off /bridging.Restricted circulation /increases in pump pressure.Loss of circulation.Loss/gain due to ballooning shales.

    Two indicators of mechanical stability problems are loss of circulationand increased volume of cavings. Partial or total loss of circulation may

    be due to pressure induced or naturally existing fractures. The reducedhydrostatic associated with loss of circulation may cause formation cavingand collapse.

    Warning Signs of Mechanical Stability Problems

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    40/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 5Section 4

    Preventing Mechanical Stability Problems

    The constraints on wellbore pressure are dictated by formation pressure onthe low end and fracture strength on the high end. Hydraulics planningmust also consider minimizing the shock load imposed to the wellbore.

    Measures to prevent/correct mechanical stability problems include:

    Increase the mud weight (if possible). The mud weight valuesshould be determined using a stability analysis model and pastexperience if drilling in a known field.If drilling fractured formations, it is not recommended to increaseMW. Increase the low end rheology (< 3 RPM Fann reading).Improve hole cleaning measures. Maintain 3-rpm Fann readinggreater than 10. GPM for high-angle wells equal to 60 times thehole diameter in inches and half this value for hole angle of less

    than 35 .Circulate on each connection. Use back reaming and wiper tripsonly if hole conditions dictate.Minimize surge/swab pressures.Monitor torque/drag and the size and amount of cuttings on

    shakers.

    0

    PorePress

    PorePressShearEnvelope

    Collapse CavingPartial Total

    Loss Loss

    HydrostaticPressure ydrostaticPressure

    Break Circ

    Swab

    Press

    Surge

    Press

    Circ

    Press

    Solids

    Loading

    TENSILE FAILUREENSILE F ILURET BLESHEAR FAILUREHE R F ILURE

    Wellbore Pressure Shock

    FracPressracPress

    WellD

    epth

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    41/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Page - 6Section 4

    Controlling Stability Problems

    The entire rig team is responsible for detecting stability problems. Oncedetected, there are many controls to consider that can provide for a stablewellbore. The drilling supervisor, with input from rig team members must

    be aware of the parameters that restore the balance between rock stress androck strength.

    Formation

    Mud

    TensileFailure Active

    Tectonics

    ShearFailure

    PorePressure

    STABLE

    UNSTABLE

    Rock Strength

    Rock Stress

    SandMWHigh

    MWLow Reaming

    TripSpeed

    ECD MobileSalt

    Shale StrikeSlip

    TensileFailure

    HoleCleaning

    Reverse

    FaultTime

    Exposed

    - Wellbore Stability -Maintaining the Balance of

    Rock Stress and Rock Strength

    The drilling team must recognize the warning signs of an unstablewellbore and adjust the drilling program accordingly to the

    balance of rock stress and rock strength.maintain

    StartStart TOCTOC Section 4

    TOC

    Section 4

    TOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://appendix.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    42/47

    APPENDIX

    A - 1 Leak-Off Tests

    A - 2 Lithology Factor (k)

    A - 3 Wellbore Stress Equations

    A - 4 Nomenclature

    max

    1

    2

    StartStart TOCTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://section4.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    43/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Appendix A-1

    LOT data is necessary to determine the maximum mud weight for wellcontrol and hole stability and has a direct influence on casing design. LOTfield data is also helpful for planning future field drilling and productionoperations because it measures the minimum horizontal stress (s ). Theminimum horizontal stress is important for wellbore stability analysis.

    Consistency in LOT procedure, accuracy in reading test pressures andproper data reporting all have a direct impact on the quality of thisinformation. Refer to document F96-P-24, Standardization of Leak-off TestProcedure for more detail.

    Preparation is a key factor in achieving good quality LOT data. Beforetesting begins:

    Check offset well leak-off data for expected leak-off test pressure, pumprates, test problems or any unusual conditions.

    Check logs for exposed sands to anticipate straight or curved linepressure plot.

    Check for hole washouts to anticipate problems with the cement job.

    Perform a casing integrity test (CIT). Test pressure at any point not toexceed 80% of casing burst.

    Construct a LOT chart.

    1. Drill out the shoe, rathole and 10 to 15 feet of new hole.

    2. Circulate the hole clean and condition the mud to a consistent density.

    3. Pull the drillstring +/-10 feet above the shoe.

    4. Rig up the cement pump on the drillstring and pressure test system.

    5. Close the annular BOP and begin the leak-off test.

    6. Maintain a constant pump rate during test (1/4 to 1 bbl/min maximum).

    7. Plot the pressure every 1/4 barrel pumped.

    h

    LOT Procedure

    A - 1 Leak-off Tests

    StartStart TOCTOC Appendix

    TOCAppendixTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    44/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Appendix A-1

    10 to 15Feet

    Testpsi

    The initial volume pumpedresults in fluid compressionand expansion of thewellbore. After this initial

    phase, pressure increaseslinearly with barrels pumped.

    Pressure

    LinearIncrease

    Shut-in Time(Minutes)

    0

    0 10 20

    1 2 3 4

    FluidCompression

    Stop Pump

    Initial Shut-in Pressure (ISIP)

    Min. Horizontal Stress (s )h

    Record every min for 20 minutesor until pressure stabilizes

    Leak off

    Barrels

    Leak-off pressure (LOP)

    initial shut inpressure (ISIP)

    minimum horizontal stress (s )

    is the first point where there is a permanentdecrease in the slope (usually equal to or greater than the minimum stress

    pressure). When the pump is stopped, pressure falls to thedue to the loss of friction pressure.

    The is the first point after a permanent

    decrease in the slope (usually equal to or less than LOP). Retest to confirmminimum stress measurement.

    As the formation is either fractured naturally or fractured during the drillingoperation, leak-off test pressure should range between 1 to 1.1 times theminimum horizontal stress.

    h

    StartStart TOCTOC Appendix

    TOCAppendixTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    45/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Appendix A-2

    k=s -h p

    s -v p

    Pressure

    Shut-in Time(Minutes)

    0

    0 10 20

    1 2 3 4

    Stop Pump

    Initial Shut-in Pressure (ISIP)

    Min HorizontalStress -s

    h

    Leak off

    Barrels

    The Lithology Factor ( ) Calculated from LOT Datak

    A - 2 Lithology Factors

    Using Poisson's Ratio ( to Calculate the Lithology Factor)

    k=

    1 -

    Clay .17very wet .50

    Conglomerate .2

    Dolomite .21

    Limestone:fine, medium .28medium, calcarenitic .31

    porous .20stylolitic .27fossiliferous .09

    bedded fossils .17shaley .17

    Sandstone:coarse .05

    coarse, cemented .10fine .03medium .06

    poorly sorted, clayey .24fossiliferous .01

    Shale:calcereous .14dolomitic .28siliceous .12silty .17sandy .12kerogenaceous .25

    Siltstone .08

    Slate .13

    From, Weurker H. G.:"Annotated Tables of Strength and Elastic Properties of Rocks", Drilling, reprint Series SPEDallas (1963)

    Poisson's Ratio Poisson's Ratio

    StartStart TOCTOC Appendix

    TOCAppendixTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    46/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Appendix A-3

    A - 3 Wellbore Stress Equations

    Stress transformation from global to wellbore coordinates:

    Where is the horizontal angle (azimuth) between s and the wellbore

    and is the wellbore inclination.

    h

    For equal horizontal stresses ( s = s )h H

    and for a vertical well with = = 0:

    Effective radial, hoop, and axial stresses at the wellbore wall:

    s = ( s cos + s sin ) cos + s sinx h H v2 2 2 2

    s = ( s cos + s sin ) sin + s cosz h H v2 2 2 2

    s = s sin + s cosy h H2 2

    s = sin cos cos (s - s )xy H h

    s = sin cos sin (s - s )yz H h

    s = sin cos ( s cos + s sin - s )xz h H v 2 2

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    s = s cos + s sinx h v2 2

    s = s sin + s cosz h v2 2

    s = sy h s = sin cos ( s - s )xz h v

    s = s = 0xy yz(7)

    (8)

    (9)

    (10)

    (11)

    s = sx h s = sy h s = sz v s = s = s = 0xy yz xz(12) (13) (15)(14)

    r= -p pw

    = ( s + s ) - 2 ( s - s ) cos 2 - 4 s sin 2 -x y x y xy p - pw

    z z x y xy= s - ( 2 ( s - s ) cos 2 + 4 s sin 2 ) -p

    r rz= = 0

    z yz xz= 2 ( s cos - s sin ) -p

    (16)

    (17)

    (18)

    (19)

    (20)

    StartStart TOCTOC Appendix

    TOCAppendixTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/
  • 5/28/2018 Amoco - Wellbore Stability

    47/47

    Wellbore Stability

    Appendix A- 4

    A - 4 Nomenclature

    pp

    k

    t

    formation pore pressurewellbore pressure (hydrostatic/ECD)

    s total overburden stress

    s minimum horizontal stress

    s maximum horizontal stress

    effective overburden stress

    effective minimum horizontal stress

    effective maximum horizontal stress

    lithology factor

    Poisson's ratio

    tectonic stress

    angle of internal friction

    coefficient of friction

    S cohesive strength

    effective radial stress

    effective hoop stress

    effective axial stress

    greatest effective stress

    intermediate effective stress

    least effective stress

    w

    v

    h

    H

    v

    h

    H

    0

    r

    z

    1

    2

    3

    StartStart TOCTOC Appendix

    TOCAppendixTOC

    http://cover.pdf/http://cover.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://contributors.pdf/http://toc.pdf/http://cover.pdf/

Recommended