+ All Categories
Home > Documents > An adjoint data assimilation approach Physical and Biological Controls on Calanus finmarchicus in...

An adjoint data assimilation approach Physical and Biological Controls on Calanus finmarchicus in...

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: britney-hicks
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
An adjoint data assimilation An adjoint data assimilation approach approach Physical Physical and Biological and Biological Controls on Controls on Calanus finmarchicus in Calanus finmarchicus in the Georges Bank Region the Georges Bank Region GlOBEC broad-scale surveys Acadia (Lynch et al., 1996, 1998)
Transcript
  • An adjoint data assimilation approachPhysical and Biological Controls on Calanus finmarchicus in the Georges Bank RegionGlOBEC broad-scale surveysAcadia (Lynch et al., 1996, 1998)

  • Jan: abundances are low (C3C4>c5; centers are advected along the bankMar-Apr: abundances are highMay: C2,C3 abundances declineJun: abundances drop sharply on the crest; high centers retain near the Southern Flank (C2, C3) and along the periphery of the bank (C4,C5); C5>C4>>C3>C2Climatological C. f. distributions (GLOBEC , 1995-1999)

  • QuestionsWhere are the off-bank sources in late winter?How are the off-bank sources imported to the bank to initiate the growing season?How do the biological processes & physical transports result in the observed C. f. distributions?How do these animals disappear from the crest of the bank?

  • R2F2F3

    F4R5R3R4Molting from C1 and C2 mortalityMortality (R

  • Forward Model:Infer R_i and C_i (t=0) by minimizing:First guess: R_i=0, C_i(t=0)=(Cobs on the bank; 0 off-bank)

  • ObservationsModel results

  • Inferred initial conditions

  • AbundanceInferred Source/sinksMolting fluxadvection

  • Inferred biological termsImportant Source regions: the GB, the Georges Basin, Wilkinson Basin, the Browns banks (Feb-Apr.)Mortality: Mar-April, Southern Flank (Food limitation, Campbell et. al., 2001); May-Jun crest (predation, Bollens et al., 1999 )

  • Inferred C3 controlsNet bio-gain/lossJan-FebFeb-MarMar-AprApr-MayMay-JuneAdvection: loss: Wilkinson, Georges Basins; Gains: northwest crest, Georges Basin and the south tip of GSC.

    Bio-gain: Feb-Apri ; Bio-loss: June;

    Feb-Apri: Bio>Adv

    June decline: Bio-losses;

  • Inferred C5 controlsJan-Feb: Advective convergence (Northern Flank,Georges Basin)Feb-Apr: Bio, Adv both are important Bio>AdvJune: Bio~AdvNet bio-gain/lossJan-FebFeb-MarMar-AprApr-MayMay-June

  • Conclusions1. The Scotian Shelf, GOM are important sources of C4 and C5 in late winter. The convergence of advective C5 flux near the northern periphery of the bank seems to be important to seed the bank.2. Both biological reactions and physical advection are important for the observed distributions. Physical transports increase from winter to spring.

  • Conclusions3. Biological gains are major contributors for high abundances in Spring; Biological losses are mainly responsible for the decline of C2-C4 in June, while for C5, both biological loss and advective transport are responsible for the June decline;4. Molting fluxes largely exceed mortality rates (C2-C3, Jan.-Jun.).5. Mar.15-Apr.15, mortality is high near the southern Flank; May.15-Jun.15, mortality is high on the crest.6. Results are inferred from modeled flow fields and data on the GB only. More accurate inference about the controls in the off-bank region needs data in those areas and improved estimate of circulation.

  • Future WorkIncorporate more data: N3C1(pump data)C2Adult stages; data in other regions.Use 3D model to study vertical migration as well as the controls already included. Explore the connection between interannual, synoptic (e.g., storm driven) physical variability & biological variability.Sensitivity study to rank the physical & biological controlsExtend the study area to a larger scale (e.g., North Atlantic).

  • Molting Flux (F)C: Concentration; D: stage duration;T: temperature; CF: Food concentrationCampbell et al., 2001

  • C2 stage durationT limitedT & Chl limitedChla: OReilly & Zetlin (1996); T (Lynch et al., 1996)

  • Climatological Jan-Feb flow (Lynch et al., 996)

  • Seasonal variations

  • ProcedureChoose a best first guess of control vector U.Integrate the forward model and calculate the cost function.Run the adjoint model to calculate the gradient of J to U.Use a descent algorithm to find a new value of U.Repeat from the second step until a satisfactory solution has been achieved.

  • The inversion reduces model-data misfit by ~90% unconstrainedconstrained

  • Computed tendenciesIncreasing season: Jan-Apr;Decline season: Apr-Jun;Centers are located along the bank periphery with advective signatures.

  • Convergence of C5 advective flux (Jan.15)

  • Inferred C2 controlsJan-Feb: biological gains first appears near the Northern edge of the Bank.Feb-May Biological gains/loses and advective transport are important June: bio.-lose is mainly responsible for the decline

  • Inferred C4 controlsNet bio-gain/lossJan-FebFeb-MarMar-AprApr-MayMay-JuneHigh abundances in spring: bio-gains; June-decline: bio-losses.

  • HypothesesGeorges Bank populations limited by C. f. supply from GOM diapause stock during winter.GB dynamics influenced by growth conditions on the bank during spring (food limited in April).GOM sources to GB become more and more important during spring and summer. Courtesy of http://globec.whoi.edu, phase1 projects

  • MARMAP Observations(1977-1987)Courtesy of www.at-sea.org

  • Figure 4. Estimates of predation impact by 5 predators, based on feeding rates and abundances of predators and prey from Broad Scale Survey samples. Impact is expressed as percent of the stocks of Calanus and Pseudocalanus removed daily, assuming that the predators are non-selective (E=0), and consume these species in the same proportions as they occur. Prey of Clytia are nauplii, prey of the other predators are copepodites and adults (Bollens et. al., online.sfsu.edu).


Recommended