+ All Categories
Home > Documents > AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

Date post: 15-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: ed-chops-fitzgerald
View: 124 times
Download: 6 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The ranch house can be viewed as an ethnographic artifact of American society, demonstrating the values, ideals, attitudes, and living patterns of a society every bit as much as a pot sherd provides information to an archeologist or a bone fragment to a paleontologist. As a style born of the Western United States, the ranch house offers a uniquely American form of vernacular . This essay briefly explores romantic perceptions of the Western US and changes in the suburban landscape as represented in the Ranch Style.
Popular Tags:
24
AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes Ed FitzGerald
Transcript
Page 1: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR

Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

Ed FitzGerald

ARCH 391Prof. Woods

05/03/07

Page 2: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

Vernacular architecture buffs often argue that we can learn the most about life in a

particular society not by scrutinizing the monumental works of its great architects but

rather, by examining those buildings common to ordinary men. In this vein, a study of the

America Ranch Style home, a form of suburban housing so popular in the post-World

War II period as to be considered banal, can elucidate the cultural intricacies and fashions

of its time. The ranch house can be viewed as an ethnographic artifact of American

society, demonstrating the values, ideals, attitudes, and living patterns of a society every

bit as much as a pot sherd provides information to an archeologist or a bone fragment to a

paleontologist. As a style born of the Western United States, the ranch house offers a

uniquely American form of vernacular1. This essay will briefly explore romantic

perceptions of the Western US and changes in the suburban landscape as represented in

the Ranch Style.

In their Field Guide to American Houses , Virginia and Lee McAlester have noted

that the popularity of “rambling Ranch houses” during the 1950s and the 60s was made

possible by the country’s growing dependence on the automobile.2 Streetcar suburbs of

the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries still used relatively compact house forms

on small lots because people walked to nearby street car lines. As the automobile

replaced street cars and buses as the principle means of personal transportation in the

decades following World War II, compact houses could be replaced by sprawling designs

on much larger lots. Never before had it been possible to be so lavish with land. The

1 The term “vernacular” has used to connote a plethora of different meanings within the discourse of architectural forms. I use the term here to refer to architecture that has, through time, been adopted and refined into culturally accepted solutions, and has, through repetition, become “traditional”. I find that this definition is the most widely applicable to the diverse spectrum of buildings (from log cabins to kivas to prairie farm houses and igloos) that are generally viewed as vernacular. 2 Virginia and Lee McAlester, Field Guide to American Houses (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 991), 479.

1

Page 3: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

rambling form of the ranch house emphasizes this by maximizing façade width, which is

further increased by the inclusion of a built-in garage. (Fig. 1)

The twentieth century suburban ranch house has its roots in the Spanish colonial

architecture of the seventeenth through nineteenth centuries. Like their modern

derivative, these buildings seldom rose more than a single story from the ground. This

was in large part due to the limitations of the native material, adobe brick, which

necessitated thicker walls as building grew in height. (Fig. 2) The early Spanish settlers

usually kept their designs simple to meet the barest needs of their inhabitants. Walls were

built low and thick to support the roof and insulated the interior from the Southwestern

climate. Roofs were low and simple as there was no snow to necessitate a high pitch. The

eaves projected in a wide overhang to shade the windows from the sun and create a

protected loggia. Buildings often had interior courtyards which were surrounded by an L-

or U-shaped floor plan. These squat, thick walled, rustic working Spanish ranchos were

common throughout the Southwestern states. With an amazing range of variations, the

modern Ranch Style remains surprisingly true to its antecedent (save the use of adobe).

The contemporary Ranch Style originated in 1930s California amidst a design

atmosphere that embraced the International Style championed by European architects like

Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, Mies van der Rohe, and Richard Neutra. (Fig. 3) By

abandoning historical precedents, stripping away all superfluous ornament, and stocking

kitchens with the latest in gadgetry, these architects sought to bring an intellectual

sophistication and machine-like efficiency to the home. Yet while the International style

offered functionality, its glass space frame boxes, flat roofs and rectilinear forms were

foreign additions to the American suburban landscape. Opponents of the style argued that

2

Page 4: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

it lacked historical precedent—in fact these designers sought to distance their work from

the architecture of the past—and ignored the tradition of national design in favor of

something foreign.3 It was in this environment that the work of designers like Cliff May

excelled.

May, a self-taught San Diego architect, is credited as the foremost pioneer of the

modern Ranch Style.4 Working with the California lifestyle periodical, Sunset Magazine,

May promoted the ranch house as an American vernacular form with its roots in colonial

Spanish California. While not entirely dismissing the Internationalists’ conception of a

form of modern aesthetics and planning appropriate to the latest views of domestic life,

he drew on an established precedent of American design. The Ranch Style incorporates

the earth-hugging silhouette of the Prairie Style houses pioneered by Frank Lloyd Wright

and common in the informal Bungalow styles of the early twentieth century. (Fig. 4)

May’s work represents a compromise in the debates regarding the suitability of modern

architecture and the appropriateness of historic nostalgia in house design. The popularity

of the ranch house suggests that this compromise was necessary to satisfy consumers

who, apparently, could only accept modernism in small doses.

The suburban Ranch Style homes that grew so popular in the three decades

following the Second World War originated in pre-war west Los Angeles with the

construction of May’s Riviera Ranch development in 1939.5 Twenty-four homes were

placed on two-thirds to one-acre lots. May prompted the development as having

“recreated ‘the romantic charm of early-day California Ranch-life’ but with all the

3 Alan Gowans, Images of American Living (New York: J.B. Lippincot, 1964), 447; Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture (London: John Rodker, 1931).4 Mary von Balgooy, “Designer of the Dream: Cliff May and the California Ranch House.” Southern California Quarterly 86 (Pasadena: Historical Society of Southern California, 2004), 133.5 Ibid.

3

Page 5: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

modern conveniences.”6 Though wartime restriction of materials brought a temporary

halt to the development of the style, the housing boom at war’s end saw a resurgence in

its popularity.

In the tradition of Andrew Jackson Downing and his nineteenth-century

residential pattern books, Cliff May took his theories and plans for the ideal suburban

home directly to the potential home owner. Sunset Magazine published a book on May’s

ranch style homes in 1946, and a revision in 1958. In Sunset Western Ranch Houses and a

second volume, Western Ranch Houses, May presented potential builders with a

picturesque version of the history of the ranch house and its colonial predecessors.7 He

offered arguments on why it was so well suited to the modern family and, of course,

provided plans to suit the readers’ tastes. The inclusion of a section devoted to historical

precedent is indicative of May’s desire to imbue the public with a cultural connection to

the ranch house and to link design to the Cold War fervor over national identity.

By illustrating the lineage of the ranch house, May anchors it in a vernacular

tradition. Juxtaposed to the theory-based designs of the International Style architects, the

Ranch Style places populist notions of domesticity and ornament before scientific or

artistic form. Yet, in touting the superiority of the ranch house, May’s argument

demonstrates more similarity than dissonance with the philosophy of modernism:

Practicality, material availability and the needs of daily life dictate design in both styles.

The most striking similarity can be seen when compared with the work of Richard

Neutra. Both men designed for the California lifestyle, promoting a close relationship to

the temperate environment. Their work erases the boundary between indoor and outdoor 6 Ibid., 135.7 Cliff May, Sunset Western Ranch Houses (San Francisco: Lane Publishing, 1946; Santa Monica CA: Henness & Ingalls, 1999); Cliff May, Western Ranch Houses (San Francisco: Lane Publishing, 1958; Santa Monica CA: Hennessy & Ingalls, 1997).

4

Page 6: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

space, bringing the garden inside with floor-to-ceiling glass in place of traditional walls.

May even suggested that living space should be a total calculation of indoor and outdoor

space.8(Fig. 5 and 6)

The Ranch Style further drew from the modernist palette in its use of space.

May’s designs incorporate dual purpose rooms with visual connection between spaces.

Kitchens, living and dinning rooms are seldom separated by full-height or unbroken

walls. In addition to giving a perception of greater space without increasing costs, this

spatial planning demonstrates May’s commitment to functionality and the realities of

modern living. While his ranch homes did not make extensive use of the steel favored by

International Style designers, May often exposed materials in rough hewn timber rafters

and field stone fireplaces. The successful use of these modernist elements demonstrates

May’s skill in straddling the boundary between two approaches. Furthermore, this

accounts, in part, for the appeal of the Ranch Style for the postwar homebuyer, conflicted

by the gap between tradition and progress.

In contrast to the modernist solution to the postwar housing dilemma, the essence

of which is embodied in the ambitious Case Study Houses of Arts & Architecture

magazine, May’s ranch house designs were widely adopted and mass produced. May’s

ranch design sold almost 15,000 plans, making up the entire neighborhoods of Long

Beach and Anaheim.9 Fittingly, May had spent the war designing low-cost military

housing for California military bases.10 The end of the war brought the homecoming of

millions of American troops who took the opportunity to escape from the congested

neighborhoods of the city for the single-family homes of the suburbs. A half a decade of 8 Sunset, 94.9 Patricia Ward Biederman. “Prefab Rehab: Low-Cost Home Has Rich Pedigree.” Los Angeles Times 21 Oct. 2004: B2. 10 Ibid.

5

Page 7: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

war and a decade of depression had left the country with a housing shortage. These young

families created a market that demanded inexpensive housing and fast. The livability,

economy, and unpretentious character of the ranch house offered an ideal solution.

To answer this demand, May adapted the sprawling 4,000 square foot models

showcased in his earlier book to more affordable ranches and split-levels that could be

more easily situated in the smaller lots of the suburbs in the 1958 edition. These plans

were offered for sale in domestic magazines like Better Homes and Gardens and along

with an even more simplified version developed specifically for subdivisions, rocketed

May’s designs into widespread use. The popularity of his designs grew such that by 1955,

eight out of ten tract houses in the United States were built in the Ranch Style and most

with a Cliff May plan.11

The mass application of the Ranch Style in Levittown and other suburbs was

especially ironic considering that the design was originally intended to ramble out onto

the Western landscape. The houses which were widely built in the 1950s and 1960s were

visibly the offspring of May’s original ranches, but no matter how much he asserted the

adaptability of this design, much was lost in the translation to small, inexpensive homes.

(Fig. 7) A home of 800 to 1,200 square feet confined to a subdivision lot simply can not

sprawl across the landscape as did the earlier designs. Coupled with substitutions of

mass-produced, economy building materials such as plywood and vinyl in place of the

natural stone and wood originally called for, the tract ranch housing does not achieve the

same rustic or historical character. In this respect, May’s designs suffered much the same

fate as many of the other modern, idealistic housing plans of postwar era.

11 von Baloogy, 138.

6

Page 8: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

Despite the best of intentions, the utopian solution offered by visionary modernist

projects like Pruitt-Igoe and the Case Study Houses failed without the proper economic

support. The reduction of a window wall to a picture window or substitution of brick with

vinyl amounted to modernism on a budget. When the suburban developer Levitt & Sons

began using the Ranch Style in the early 1950s, Architectural Record applauded this shift

and the hope it offered in the modernists’ struggle to steer subdivision design toward their

form of architecture.12 Yet many of the “ranches” built in subdivisions looked less like

May’s designs than they did a half-height Levittown Cape Cod. They certainly did not

maintain the flowing access between the interior and a grand natural landscape as May

had intended: “I rebelled against the boxy houses … I wanted a design that was about

sunshine and informal outdoor living.”13

While May’s statement marks the greatest irony of the Ranch Style, it is

nonetheless influential as an element in the modern vernacular landscape. Its wide-scale

application in the postwar era simultaneously evades the heritage of the Spanish ranchos

while cementing the Ranch Style in the American architectural lexicon. As with many

examples of vernacular building, the abundance of ranch homes in many parts of the

country today relegates them to pedestrian status and an odd sort of obscurity. Alan Hess

of Architectural Digest has noted this saying,

The ranch house is the poor stepchild of American architecture. Unpretentious,

low-slung, cranked out like Big Macs by tract-house builders in the 1950s, it was

America’s most widely built single family home its very success casting a spell

that doomed it to invisibility.14

12 N.A., “4,000 Houses Per Year,” Architectural Record 90, no. 4 (1949), 86.13 Alan Hess. “Romantic Mandalay: Recalling the Architect’s Dream House in West Los Angeles.” Architectural Digest Special Edition (2005) : 29814 Hess, 296.

7

Page 9: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

It has not been until recently that May’s designs have received the interest they deserve.

In March of 2003, Architectural Digest advertised a Cliff May Estate in the Santa Ynez

Valley, California, for $2.295 million.15

Perhaps it should come as no surprise that the Ranch Style became so popular in

post-war America when cowboy and western frontier themes prevailed in film and

television. By illustrating the lineage of the ranch house, Cliff May made clear that his

was a vernacular form which grew from a unique American situation. In another sense,

large-scale construction of Ranch Style homes in the decades following the Second

World War has by sheer number anchored their vernacular status. These homes, nostalgic

of the American past, are today reminders of that generation which grew of age during

the Depression, fought a world war and sought the American dream. They did care about

style, and wanted styles which fit within their consumerist image of the ideal home. Yet

there were clearly limits to the level of style that could be purchased on a GI mortgage.

Finally, they did not want to abandon a connection to the national past, especially not

their link with the frontier as they pioneered new frontiers of their own in the workplace

and at home.

15 N.A., “Editors Select Properties Around the World,” Architectural Digest 60 (2003), 97.

8

Page 10: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

The millions of families who have embraced the suburban way of life have embarked upon a larger adventure then most of them dream of. In our national experience it can only be compared to that pioneering venture, the frontier itself. 16

Good Housekeeping, January, 1955

16 N.A., “What Makes A Good Suburb,” Good Housekeeping (January, 1955), 30.

9

Page 11: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 1. Typical ranch by Cliff May with built-in garage to the right.

10

Page 12: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 2. Page from Sunset Western Ranch Houses showing Spanish colonial design.

11

Page 13: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 3. Rendering of a 1927 International Style house designed by Robert Neutra.

FIGURE 4. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Darwin D. Martin House, Buffalo, NY, 1904.

12

Page 14: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 5. Early Cliff May custom designed home.

13

Page 15: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 6. Richard Neutra interior/exterior view.

14

Page 16: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

FIGURE 7. A Levittown ranch before landscaping. 1952.

15

Page 17: AN AMERICAN VERNACULAR Cliff May’s Ranch Homes

WORKS CITED

van Balgooy, Mary A. “Designer of the Dream: Cliff May and the California Ranch House.” Southern California Quarterly 86. Pasadena: Historical Society of Southern California, 2004. p. 127-144.

Biederman, Patricia Ward. “Prefab Rehab: Low-Cost Home Has Rich Pedigree.” Los Angeles Times. 21, Oct. 2004, sec. B2.

Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture. London: John Rodker, 1931.

N.A., “Editors Select Properties Around the World.” Architectural Digest. 60. 2003. p. 97.

Gowans, Alan. Images of American Living. New York: J.B. Lippincot, 1964.

Hess, Alan “Romantic Mandalay: Recalling the Architect’s Dream House in West Los Angeles.” Architectural Digest. Special Edition. 2005.

May, Cliff. Sunset Western Ranch Houses. San Francisco: Lane Publishing, 1946. Santa Monica CA: Hennessy & Ingalls, 1999.

May, Cliff. Western Ranch Houses. San Francisco: Lane Publishing, 1958. Santa Monica CA: Hennessy & Ingalls, 1997.

McAlester, Virginia and Lee. Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991.

N.A., “What Makes A Good Suburb,” Good Housekeeping. January, 1955.

N.A., “4,000 Houses Per Year,” Architectural Record. 90, no. 4, 1949.

IMAGES

1. May, Cliff. Sunset Western Ranch Houses. San Francisco: Lane Publishing, 1946. Santa Monica CA: Hennessy & Ingalls, 1999. p 87.

2. Ibid., 13.3. “Neutra Architecture.” available online, http://www.neutra.org, (accessed 5/3/07).4. Wikipedia. “Frank Lloyd Wright.” available online,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lloyd_Wright (accessed 5/3/07).5. “Rancho Style Newsletter. March, 2004.” available online,

http://www.ranchostyle.com/newsletters/RanchoStyle_4pa_402b.pdf (accessed 5/3/07)

6. “Neutra Architecture.” available online, http://www.neutra.org, (accessed 5/3/07).7. “Levittown, PA: Building the Suburban Dream.” available online,

http://server1.fandm.edu/levittown/images/lg_jpegs/H32P4.jpg (accessed 5/3/07).

16


Recommended