Date post: | 20-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nathaniel-kelly |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
An ICT-rich learning arrangement for the concept of function in grade 8: student perspective and teacher perspective
Paul DrijversFreudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics EducationUtrecht University
Universität Köln, 20.01.09www.fi.uu.nl
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
1 The project Project name: Tool Use in Innovative Learning
Arrangements for Mathematics Granted by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
Research NWO Timeline: 2006 – 2008 Research team:
• Peter Boon, programmer / researcher• Michiel Doorman, researcher • Paul Drijvers, PI / researcher • Sjef van Gisbergen, teacher / researcher• Koeno Gravemeijer, supervisor• Helen Reed, master student
www.fi.uu.nl/tooluse/en
Project theme: math & technology Integrating technology in mathematics education seems
promising
But optimistic claims are not always realized!
Technology for ‘drill & practice’ or also for conceptual development?
If yes, how to achieve this?
Research Questions
1. How can applets be integrated in an instructional sequence for algebra, so that their use fosters the learning?
2. How can teachers orchestrate tool use in the classroom community?
AppletsFor collections of applets see:
www.fi.uu.nl/wisweb/en/ (primary)
www.fi.uu.nl/rekenweb/en/ (secondary)
So far: rather much design / development of games / applets than research on their use in the classroom
Project concretisation Mathematical subject: the concept of fonction
Tools: an applet embedded in an electronic learning environment
Target group: mid – high achieving students in grade 8 (14 year olds)
Teaching sequence: 7-8 lessons of 50 minutes
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
2 The function conceptTwo quotes:
“The very origin of function is stating and producing dependence (or connection) between variables occurring in the physical, social, mental world (i.e. in and between these worlds).”(Freudenthal, 1982)
“The function is a special kind of dependence, that is, between variables which are distinguished as dependent and independent. (...) This - old fashioned - definition stresses the phenomenologically important element: the directedness from something that varies freely to something that varies under constraint.” (Freudenthal, 1983)
Function definitions
"a quantity composed in any of [a] variable and constant" (Bernoulli, 1718)
an "analytic expression" (Euler, 1747)
f is a function from a set A to a set B if f is a subset of the Cartesian product of A (the domain) and B (the range), so that for each a in A there exists exactly one b in B with (a, b) in f. (Dirichlet-Bourbaki, 1934)
How useful are these definitions for lower secondary mathematics education?
The ‘function gap’
Lower secondary level (SI, 13 – 15 year olds): a way to describe a calculation process, an input-output ‘machine’ for numerical values.
Upper secondary level (SII, 16 – 18 year olds): a mathematical object, with several representational faces, which one can consider as membre of a family, or that can be submitted to a higher level procedure such as differentiation.
Intentions and didactical ideas
Intentions: To bridge the gap between the two, facilitate the
transition and promote a rich conception of the notion of function including both the process and the object view.
Relevant ideas from mathematics didactics: Vinner (1983), Vinner & Dreyfus (1989):
Concept definition and concept image Janvier (1987):
Multiple representations – formula, graph, table Sfard (1991): Process – object duality Malle (2000): Function as assignment and as co-variation
Proces-object duality (Sfard, 1991):
Operational conception: processes
Structural conception: objects
In the process of concept formation, operational conceptions precede the structural
Three aspects of the notion of function:
a. Dependency relation from input to output
b. Dynamical process of co-variation
c. Mathematical object with several representations
Mathematical phenomenology or didactical phenomenology?
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
3 The ICT tools (1) Freudenthal (1983) mentions activities with arrow chains
as one means to approach the function concept ICT tool: The applet AlgebraPijlen (“AlgebraArrows”):
chains of operations, connected by arrows, with tables, graphs and formulas.
3 The ICT tools (2)The Digital Mathematics Environment (DME) :
Author: design tasks and activities, ‘Digital textbook’
Student: work, look back, improve, continue, ‘Digital worksheet’
Teacher: prepare, comment, assess, ‘Collection of digital worksheets’
Researcher: observe, analyse the digital results, ‘Digital database’
The tools and the function concepta. The function as a dependency relation from input to
output: construct and use chains
The tools and the function conceptb. The function as a dynamical process of co-variation:
change input values to study the effect, use trace (graph) and scroll (input/table)
The tools and the function conceptc. The function as a mathematical object with several
representations: compose chains, construct inverse chains, link representations and study families of functions
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
4 Learning arrangementMain ideas:
Mixture of working formats: group work, individual work, work in pairs with the computer, plenary teaching and discussion
Mixture of tools: paper – pencil, posters, cards, applet, DME, both in school and at home
First step: a hypothetical learning trajectory
Learning arrangement: lesson 1 Group work on three central problems
Learning arrangement: lesson 2 Posters, presentations and ‘living chains’
Learning arrangement: lesson 3 First work in pairs with the applet after introduction
Learning arrangement: lesson 4 Second work in pairs with the applet after plenary
homework review
Learning arrangement: lesson 5 Group work on the ‘matching’ of representations
Learning arrangement: lesson 6 Third applet session in pairs after plenary discussion
Learning arrangement: lesson 7 (+8) Final work with the applet and reflections on the concept
of function and its notation
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
5 Some results on learning
A. Difficulties to express the reasoning
B. Mixed media approach fruitful (paper-pencil <-> applet)
C. Form-function shift as a model for describing conceptual change in ICT-rich learning
A Difficulties to express the reasoning
Students explaining dynamic co-variation:
“Goes up sidewards” “Straigt line” “Further and further away
from 0” “All equally steep” “With the same jumps” “The point is always moving” “It goes up steeper and
steeper” “It gets higher and higher”
B Mixed media approach fruitful
C Form-function shift
Form-function shift as a model for describing conceptual change in ICT-rich learning
Example: task 1.6
The work of two girls Their work ‘real time’: Atlas (clip 59:9) Their final product:
Hypothesis: form-function shift (1)
A form-function shift (Saxe, 1991) takes place concerning the functions that arrow chains have for the student:
Initially, the arrow chain represents a calculation process, and is a means to calculate the output value once the input value is given. The arrow chain helps to organize the calculation process.
Evidence: students make new chains for the same calculation:
Hypothesis: form-function shift (2) Later, the arrow chains become object-like entities that
represent functional relationships and can be compared and reasoned with.
Verfication of the hypothesis: Task 4.1
The work of the two girls
Results of three classes
Theoretical interest Form-function shift here might be a suitable construct to
explain conceptual change when there is little technical development in the use of the ICT tool.
Instrumental genesis, which was one of the points of departure of this study, seems to be more appropriate for more versatile technological tools.
Table of independentinput values
Graphic representation
Table of dependent output values
Chain of operationsFormula
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
6 Some results on teaching
A. Different whole-class orchestrations
B. Relations with teachers’ views on teaching and learning
C. Interaction teacher – student
A Different whole-class orchestrationsMain orchestrations observed:
1. Technical demo2. Explain the screen3. Link screen board4. Discuss the screen5. Spot and show: example6. Sherpa at work: example
Orchestrations by teacher
Orchestration type TeacherA cycle1
TeacherAcycle2
TeacherB
cycle2
TeacherCcycle3
TeacherA cycle3
Total
Technical-demo 5 3 2 7 5 21
Explain-the-screen 0 0 0 7 1 8
Link-screen-board 3 0 6 0 3 12
Discuss-the-screen 4 4 3 1 2 13
Spot-and-show 0 1 12 2 2 19
Sherpa-at-work 2 7 0 0 1 10
Total 14 15 23 17 14 83
B Relations with teachers’ views on teaching and learning
Teacher A: “…so you could discuss it with the students using the images that you say on the screen, […] it makes it more lively…”
Teacher B:“I use the board to take distance from the specific ICT-environment, otherwise the experience remains too much linked to the ICT”
Teacher C:“I am a typical teacher for mid-ability students, and these students need clear demonstrations and explanations”
C Interaction teacher – studentDifferent types of interactions: Content of interaction:
• Mathematical meaning• Technical meaning• Situational meaning• Interaction-meaning-technical
Form of interaction:• Revoicing• Questioning• Answering
Outline1. The project
2. The function concept
3. The ICT tools
4. Learning arrangement
5. Some results on learning
6. Some results on teaching
7. Conclusion
7 Conclusion on learning1. How can applets be integrated in
an instructional sequence for algebra, so that their use fosters the learning?
Global learning trajectory works, but which problem does the function concept solve for the students?
Mixed media approach fruitful Subtle relation between applet technique and concept development (instrumentation, FFS)
Form-function shift as a model for describing conceptual change in ICT-rich learning
7 Conclusion on teaching2. How can teachers orchestrate tool
use in the classroom community?
Technical class management not self-evident! Mixture of whole-class orchestrations, related to teachers’
views Demonstration/presentation/class discussion important for
reflection and collective instrumental genesis DME offers means to monitor the learning The teacher important for orchestrating discussion /
reflection / convergence of techniques and thinking
7 Conclusion on theoryTheoretical questions:
Is the framework of instrumental genesis, with its stress on the relation between technical and conceptual development, useful in case the tool is as ‘simple’ as an applet?