+ All Categories
Home > Documents > AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: freya-hardy
View: 13 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011. Problem 1. Limited understanding of nutrition and food security. Nutrition Security means. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
40
AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011
Transcript
Page 1: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Page 2: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF NUTRITION AND FOOD SECURITY

Problem 1

Page 3: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Nutrition Security means

Access to adequate quantities of carbohydrates, proteins, fats, micronutrients through availability and affordability of diverse foods including grains, pulses, oil, meat, milk, eggs, vegetables, and fruits to meet the requirement for a person according to the stage in her/his life cycle.

Access to safe drinking water as a public good.

Page 4: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Access to food depends on

• Control over land , water, forest• Just wages, full safe employment, social

security• State policies that support food production • A system that supports people, not

corporates

An Act is only one small part of all that is needed

Page 5: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The Government’s understanding of “Food Security” is limited to making a limited amount of subsidised grain and some cooked food available to the poorest. There are no elements of change for equity in food production and income distribution.

Page 6: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

TARGETING AND BPL WITH ALL ITS PROBLEMS REMAINS

PROBLEM 2

Page 7: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

It is only the universal principle that will allowDalits, Tribals and the Socially vulnerable to exercise their right to food

These are the majority communities who are excluded when targeting happens

Preventing Exclusion

Page 8: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Total monthly requirements for a five member family – ICMR norms

Family member Monthly requirement of cereals (kg.)

Monthly requirement of pulses (kg.)

Monthly requirement of oils (grams)

Man doing moderate work

14.4 2.7 1050

Woman doing moderate work.

10.8 2.25 900

1-6 year old child 5 1.1 675

7 to 12 year old child

9 1.8 750

Elderly person / third child

9 1.8 675

Total 48.2 9.65 4050

Page 9: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

A Universal Public Distribution System Remove APL BPL– subsidised food for allNutritional security with per head monthly entitlements of at least14 kgs of cereals, 1.5 kgs of pulses and 800 gms of oil

Requirement is therefore

Page 10: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

But what does the Government draft say?

– Every person belonging to priority &general household to receive food grains at prescribed rates and quantities

– No pulses or oil – Proposed as follows

  Priority group General group

Food Entitlement

Seven Kg. of food grains (rice, wheat or nutritional cereals) per person/month

Three Kg. of food grain/ person/month

Price Not exceeding 3/2/1/ per Kg. Not exceeding 50 % of MSP.

Page 11: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Central Government has powers to

• Amend or modify schedule of rates and quantities

• Decide on number of families in the priority households, based on state-wise poverty ratio and on the additional number of persons belonging to the general household ,in such a manner that in each state the combined coverage under the TPDS belonging to priority and general household are 75% and 50% of the rural and urban population, respectively.

• Prescribe the guidelines for identification of priority and general household.

• Within the state, identification of priority and general household shall be done by State Govt. (Provided that no household meeting the exclusion criteria prescribed by the central government is included either in the priority or the general households.)

Page 12: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Thus

• BPL and targeting with all its problems remains

• Central Government meets only partial requirements of cereals and does not at all touch on pulses and oils

• Central Government has the power to reduce amounts , population covered , change rates

Page 13: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

LIP SERVICE TO PROBLEMS OF PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION

PROBLEM 3

Page 14: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Food Security in a Vacuum

NFS Bill provides food security without considering production aspects – as if food procurement and food distribution can be divorced from production

In actuality, production, procurement, storage and distribution have to be considered together

Page 15: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

There is a severe agricultural crisis in the country. Procurement for an expanded PDS will give a boost to production and can become an important instrument for the revitalization of the agricultural economy.

Possible to Use An Expanded PDS To Revive Agriculture

Page 16: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

We had suggested expanded PDS Along With New Procurement Policy

Procurement from all mandis, so that all areas benefit from govt. procurement (not just major procurement from Punjab, Haryana, AP and partially UP, as is now the case)

Procurement at MSP of millets, pulses and oilseeds etc to boost these crops which are now facing neglect due to low and uncertain prices and due to low investment.

These crops are easily grown in dry-land areas and are not water/input intensive.

Procurement should be at fair MSP prices.

Page 17: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Local Distribution Of Local Procurement

Distribution of grain procured from beyond the district zone should be resorted to only if there is a shortfall in local procurement. This will allow:

Procurement, and therefore support to farmers, from all areas .

Locally preferred grain to be distributed Drastically cut down storage and transportation

costs Help curb corruption by allowing easier tracking of

grain movements

However, since many areas suffer from deficits, it is important to ensure that the original intention of the PDS ie : movement of food from surplus to deficit areas will be ensured by Central govt agencies.

Village level grain banks to be established to encourage local procurement, storage and distribution to ensure food security

Page 18: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Policies to increase food production, consumption, nutrition Immediate ban on export of food until malnutrition is ended

in the country. Protect farmers from “dumping” of unfairly subsidized

imports. First call on all natural resources, including land and water,

must be for food. No forcible diversion of land, water and forest resources away from food production.

Stop corporatization of agriculture and control of food by agribusiness corporations.

Immediate moratorium on genetically modified (GM) seeds, GM food imports, and use of GM food in government food schemes.

All speculation and futures trading in food items should be banned.

Government must eliminate the entry of corporate interests (including contract farming) and private contractors in food production, the food market, regulatory bodies and nutrition-related schemes.

Governments must not enter into any partnerships with the private sector where there is a conflict of interests.

Government must ensure access to safe drinking water and sanitation for all.

Page 19: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says Central, State and local Governments shall strive to(1) Revitalise Agri.

a. agrarian reforms securing interest of small and marginal farmers

b. increase in investments; R&D; extension services

c. ensuring remunerative prices; credit; irrigation

d. prohibiting unwarranted diversion of land

(2) Procurement; Storage and Movement

a. incentivize the decentralize procurement

b. geographical diversification of operations

c. scientific storage

d. priority of movements of food grains- sufficient rakes/ expanding

railway line STRIVE TO amounts to good intentions with no

surety on action

Page 20: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

CHILDREN’S RIGHT TO FOOD IS INSECURE

PROBLEM 4

Page 21: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

For Infants’ Right to Food Infants need - Initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of

birth- Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months

Nutrition Security for Infants includes

- Skilled assistance and counselling for infant and young child feeding

- Financial and nutritional assistance to the mother for six months after birth

- Creches in the community and at the work site

Page 22: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

For Children’s Right to Food

Program of feeding in ICDS centres and schools from birth till Class X.

Minimum nutrition norms specified in the ActCooked hot meal

Proper infrastructure- buildings, drinking water, toilets, equipment

Adequate staff Health check ups in schools and ICDS

centers No use of contractors Provision for inflation

Page 23: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Universalise ICDS

All children in the age group of 0-6 years entitled to basic nutrition, health and pre-school education services including supplementary nutrition; immunization; health check-ups; referral services; growth monitoring and promotion; pre-school education; counselling of mothers for infant and young child feeding

Support and counselling for Breastfeeding

No promotion of baby foods Weekly Take-home rations Identification and treatment of acute

malnutrition

Page 24: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill gives limited services

Page 25: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

No Guard Against Inflation, No Guarantee of Funding by Central

Government• Entitlements under section 4,5&6

shall be realised through specific schemes, which will be implemented by the State Govt in accordance with the guidelines ,including for cost sharing between centre and state according to Central Govt.

Page 26: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

SERVICES AND DEFINITION FOR VULNERABLE INADEQUATE

PROBLEM 5

Page 27: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Rights of the Vulnerable and Socially Excluded

The Act must recognise the rights of the most vulnerable. These include old people, physically challenged , people suffering from/living with HIV/AIDS , TB or other debilitating and stigmatized diseases, single women headed households, beggars, bonded labourers, primitive tribes, most marginalised groups, homeless, unprotected street and working children etc.

All such people to be provided Antodaya cards.

Page 28: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Antodaya Card Holders

All Antodaya card holders to get rations at half price

Hot cooked meals for old and infirm Double food quotas in ICDS and maternity

benefits Old age pensions of Rs. 1300 p.m. (inflation

indexed) Supply of one quintal of food per month

free of cost for six months (after distress is discovered)

Other special programs like community kitchens or residential schools for street children

Page 29: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Other Special Categories

Migrants, urban homeless and slum dwellers to be categories for whom special measures to be taken up

Disaster struck to be given Antodaya cards and double entitlements immediately

Pensions of Rs.1300 for elderly, single women and disabled

Maternity benefits of Rs 1,000 per month for six months, along with crèches

Page 30: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says

All destitute persons shall be entitled to at least one cooked meal everyday free of charge in accordance to scheme prescribed by the Central Govt.

’Destitute person’ means one who lacks resources for dignified living.All homeless and poor ,casual workers& migrant labourers shall be entitled to

cooked meals at community kitchens according to schemes prescribed by Central Govt.

In the case of emergency disaster the State Govt. shall provide free two cooked meals to the affected household or provide them ration free of charge ,for a period up to three months after disaster.

The State Govt. will identify persons, households ,groups living in starvation or conditions akin to starvation and shall provide

(1)Free Cooked meals two times a day ,for 6 months from date of identification.

(2)any other relief deemed necessary by the State Govt.The Government shall strive for pensionsNo maternity benefits.

For vulnerable, categories covered and benefits given are much less than what we asked for. Specially pensions shall only be STRIVED FOR

No Maternity benefits

Page 31: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

CASH TRANSFERS ARE BEING INTRODUCED

PROBLEM 6

Page 32: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says

• “Reforms in TPDS” which includesintroducing scheme of cash transfer in lieu

of entitlements under the Act.• In case of shortage of supply, Central

Govt. shall provide funds for state Govt. to meeting obligations under the Act.

Page 33: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Positive: Cards for Women

NFSB has agreed to thisWomen of eighteen years or

above to be head of household for purpose of

distribution of ration cards

Page 34: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

REFORMS IN PDS ARE ONLY TO BE “STRIVED FOR”

PROBLEM 7

Page 35: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

Some of the reforms in PDS required

•door step delivery with removal of

wholesalers

•de-privatisation of all ration shops

•Computerisation for transparency

•Strong community vigilance

Issues of Corruption and Leakages

Page 36: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

NFS Bill: Governments shall strive for

Reforms in TPDS in consonance with functional role

a. doorstep deliveryb. computerization to ensure transparent

recording of transactionsc. leveraging ‘aadhaar’ for unique identificationd. full transparencye. preference to public institutions;

cooperatives etc. in licensing FPS by women or women’s collectives

f. support to local distribution models

Page 37: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says

For efficient operations under TPDS, State Government to :

a. create/maintain scientific storage at State/District/Block Level

b. strengthen capacities of food and civil supplies corporations

c. institutionalise licensing arrangements for Fair Price Shops (FSPs) under PDS Control Order, 2001

All TPDS records be placed under public domain.

All PRIs/ULBs authorized by State Gov. to conduct regular social audits

 Set up Vigilance Committees as prescribed under the PDS Control Order, 2001 at the State, District, Block and FPS

Vigilance Committee shall perform:

• a. regularly supervise

• b. inform District Grievance Redressal Officer for violations

• c. inform District Grievance Redressal of any mal practice or misappropriation

EXPERIENCE WITH NREGS AND EXISTING VIGILANCE DOES NOT SHOW MUCH HOPE

Page 38: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

INADEQUATE PROVISIONS TO PUNISH PENALISE OR COMPENSATE

PROBLEM 8

Page 39: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says

• In case of failure to supply the entitled persons, they will be entitled to receive food security allowance from the State Govt. in a manner prescribed by the Central Govt.

• Any public servant/authority found guilty of failing to comply with the relief recommended by District Grievance Redressal Officer shall be liable to penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees

INADEQUATE AFTER OUR EXPERIENCE WITH

NREGA

Page 40: AN INADEQUATE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL 2011

The NFS Bill says

• A District grievance officer (GRO), shall be appointed in each district, to enforce various entitlement under this act and, investigate and redress grievance.

• State and National Food Commissions to be set up

POWERS TO PUNISH AND ENFORCE ARE NOT THERE

NOTHING ON HOW TO PREVENT POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INTERFERENCE IN

APPOINTMENT AND FUNDING OF GRO AND COMMISSIONS


Recommended