Critical Care in
Obstetrics:
An Innovative and Integrated Model for
Learning the Essentials
Amniotic Fluid Embolism
Gary A. Dildy, M.D. Professor
Vice Chairman of Quality & Patient Safety
Program Director, MFM Fellowship
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Chief Quality Officer
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Baylor College of Medicine
Texas Children’s Hospital
I have no conflicts of interest to disclose
Disclosure
History
Incidence & Outcomes
Pathophysiology & Etiology
Diagnosis
Evaluation & Treatment
Summary
Evidence
Outline
Recognize typical clinical presentation
Develop a differential diagnosis
Know the range of reported incidences
Understand the morbidity and mortality
Learn how to initiate supportive
management
Learning Objectives
History
Historical References
JAMA 1941; 117: 1245-1254 & 1341-1345.
Brazil-Med 1926; 40 (11): 301–303.
Historical References
Literature Review
PubMed.gov accessed 29 November 2013
“preeclampsia” n = 29,248
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/opo9607a/ http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/
A Nebulous Syndrome
Nebulous
adjective
in the form of a cloud or
haze; hazy
unclear, vague, or ill-
defined
Classic triad:
Hypoxia
Hypotension or hemodynamic collapse
Coagulopathy
Remains poorly understood: unpredictable, rare, acute, and lacks a gold standard diagnosis
There probably are formes frustes of AFE
“Let us be careful not to make it a waste basket for all cases of unexplained death in labor…”
Eastman, 1948
Key Points
Incidence &
Outcomes
1/8,000 to 1/80,000 deliveries
Maternal mortality up to 86%
A leading cause of U.S. maternal
mortality
11-14% of all maternal deaths
Most common cause of peripartum
death
Key Points
Incidence (per 100,000 maternities)
Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, UK & USA
Retrospective discharge database 5.5-6.1
~ 1:17,000
Validated case identification 1.9-2.5
~ 1:45,000
Incidence
Knight et al. Amniotic fluid embolism incidence, risk factors and outcomes: a review
and recommendations. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012; Feb 10;12:7
If the difference between the above 2 rates is due solely to false
positives in the former, the incidence of AFE is overestimated by
62% in retrospective discharge database studies. (GAD)
Global Statistics
Country Time period Publication Contribution to
maternal
mortality (%)
Sweden 1951-1980 Hogberg, 1985 1-17
Japan 1964-1980 Shinagawa, 1983 5
USA 1979-1986 Atrash, 1990 8
Australia 1984-1993 Burrows, 1995 10
Singapore 1990-1999 Lau, 2002 31
UK 1994-1996 Dept Health, 1998 13
Poland 1991-2000 Troxzynski, 2003 22
USA 2000-2006 Clark, 2008 14
CAUSE OF DEATH Number % Complications of Preeclampsia 15 16
Amniotic fluid embolism 13 14
Obstetric hemorrhage 11 12
Cardiac disease 10 11
Pulmonary Thromboembolism 9 9
Non-obstetric infection 7 7
Obstetric infection 7 7
Accident/suicide 6 6
Medication error or Reaction 5 5
Ectopic pregnancy 1 1
Other 11 12
TOTAL 95 100
HCA, 2000-2006
Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes,
prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(1):36.e1-5
Outcomes
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Clark 1995 Tuffnell 2005
Maternal Outcome
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Clark 1995 Tuffnell 2005
Fetal Outcome
Clark SL, Hankins GD, Dudley DA, Dildy GA, Porter TF. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1158-67.
Tuffnell DJ. United kingdom amniotic fluid embolism register. BJOG 2005;112:1625-9.
Outcomes- Maternal Mortality
Pathophysiology
& Etiology
Proposed Pathophysiology
Clark SL, Hankins GD, Dudley DA, Dildy GA, Porter TF. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national
registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(4 Pt 1):1158-67; discussion 1167-9
Anaphylaxis
(IgE)
Sepsis
(Endotoxin)
Amniotic Fluid
Embolism (various fetal elements)
Endogenous Mediator Release
Clinical Manifestations
Phase I
Vasoactive
substance(s)
Pulmonary vasospasm
Profound hypoxia
Pulmonary injury
Myocardial injury
Resolved in 15-30 min
Phase II
Left heart failure
Pulmonary edema/
ARDS
Coagulopathy
Proposed Pathophysiology
Clark et al. Hemodynamic alterations associated with amniotic fluid embolism: a reappraisal.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:617-21.3
Hemodynamics
Clark et al. Hemodynamic alterations associated with amniotic fluid embolism: a reappraisal.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:617-21.3
Hemodynamics
Nonpregnant (n = 10)
Nl 3rd Tri (n = 10)
AFE (n = 15)
MPAP 12 2 13 2 26 16
PCWP 6 2 8 2 19 9
PVR 119 47 78 22 176 72
LVSWI 41 8 48 6 26 19
Clark et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1124-6.
Clark et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1439-42.
Clark et al. Personal communication, unpublished data.
Animal studies- Inconsistent results
In vitro studies amniotic fluid:
Shortens whole blood clotting time
Has thromboplastin-like effect
Induces platelet aggregation & release of platelet
factor III
Activates complement cascade
Contains a direct factor X activating factor
Human studies
AFE coagulopathy probably similar to that in
severe placental abruption
Pathophysiology: Coagulopathy
2 cases of maternal death attributed to AFE
Supra-lethal levels maternal plasma TNF-α
(> 0.1 ng/mL) at admission
29 yo G3P1 at 41+ weeks 1 ng/mL
30 yo G3P2 at 28+ weeks 10 ng/mL
Etiology: Infection?
Romero et al. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 64: 113-125
Etiology: Oxytocics?
Clark et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1158-69
As illustrated in this case, uterine hypertonicity
followed the initial signs and symptoms of AFE.
Kramer et al. Lancet 2006
Canada 1991-2002
Association: yes
Abenhaim et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008
USA 1999-2003
Association: no
Knight et al. Obstet Gynecol 2010
UK 2005-2009
Association: yes
Etiology: Induction of Labor?
Prepidil Package Insert (02/09)
“The Clinician should be alert that the intracervical placement
of dinoprostone gel may result in inadvertent disruption and
subsequent embolization of antigenic tissue causing in rare
circumstances the development of Anaphylactoid
Syndrome of Pregnancy (Amniotic Fluid Embolism).”
Cervidil Package Insert (04/10)
“The Clinician should be alert that use of dinoprostone may
result in inadvertent disruption and subsequent embolization
of antigenic tissue causing in rare circumstances the
development of Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy
(Amniotic Fluid Embolism).”
PGE, AFE & the FDA
Diagnosis
AFE Registry Entry Criteria
Acute hypotension or cardiac arrest
Acute hypoxia
Coagulopathy
Onset during labor, delivery, or 30 minutes
postpartum
Absence of any other explanation
Occurrence within 5 years of registry opening
Diagnostic Criteria
Clark et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1158-69
Acute myocardial infarction
Anaphylactic shock
Anesthetic accident
Aspiration pneumonia
Placental abruption
Pulmonary thromboembolism
Septic shock
Differential Diagnosis
Histologic Findings of AFE
Diagnostic Criteria
Tuffnell D, Knight M, Plaat F. Amniotic fluid embolism - an update. Anaesthesia 2011;66(1):3-6
Evaluation &
Treatment
Initial Evaluation
CBC & platelet
count
Fibrinogen and FSP
PT, PTT, and INR
Blood type & cross
Arterial blood gas
Serum electrolytes
Cardiac enzymes
Chest X-ray
12-lead EKG
Echocardiogram
Initial treatment is supportive
CPR, high FiO2
Treat left ventricular failure
Volume expansion, inotropes
Fetal management
Cardiac arrest: perimortem C/S
ABC’s + D
Hemodynamically unstable: individualize
Treatment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
< 5
5 to 15
16 to 25
26 to 35
36 to 54
Neonatal Survival
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 to 5
6 to 10
11 to 15
16 to 20
21+
Katz VJ et al. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 571-6
Clark SL et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1158-69
Arrest-to-Delivery Interval
Intact vs. Impaired
Cardiopulmonary
bypass
Hemofiltration
Recombinant Factor VIIa
Nitric oxide
High-dose
corticosteroids
Treatment: case reports
Eason MP. The death of Mrs. Smith. Acad Med 2005;80(9):865.
Daniels K, Parness AJ. Development and use of mechanical devices for
simulation of seizure and hemorrhage in obstetrical team training. Simul
Healthc 2008;3(1):42-6.
Fransen et al. Effect of obstetric team training on team performance and
medical technical skills: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG
2012;119(11):1387-93.
Bolden et al. Making the case for obstetric "response teams" and simulation in
labor and delivery: management of catastrophic amniotic fluid embolism
during labor. J Clin Anesth 2012;24(6):517-8.
Simulation & Team Training
1992 Clark AJOG 0/2
1995 Burrows ANZJOG 0/1
1998 Duffy AIC 0/2
1998 Collier AIC 0/1
2000 Stiller JRM 0/1
2005 Demianczuk JOGC 0/1
2006 Abecassis IJOA 0/1
Recurrence Risk
Maximum Risk with 95% CL: “Rule of 3” (3/n)*100 = 33%
Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting
zero numerators. JAMA 1983;249(13):1743-5
The Future
Objective - To develop a UK-wide Obstetric
Surveillance System to describe the
epidemiology of a variety of uncommon
disorders of pregnancy.
Mission - to improve the care given to women,
their babies and their families, by advancing
knowledge and contributing to the evidence
base about serious, rare disorders in
pregnancy including near-miss events, through
international co-operation and collaborative
working.
Mission - AFE Foundation exists to spur clinical
research, raise awareness, provide clinical
and patient based information and offer
supportive services to those affected by or
interested in Amniotic Fluid Embolism http://www.afesupport.org
http://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/inoss
https://www.npeu.ox.adc.uk/ukoss
AFE Foundation & BCM partnered to create a new
registry
The AFE Registry opened 2 August 2013
Cases are collected and abstracted
Cases are categorized (Classic v Atypical v Unlikely AFE)
Future Plans
AFE families Bio-Bank (store serum/plasma and DNA)
Network for collection of specimens from acute AFE cases
AFE Registry at BCM
Summary
Thought to follow maternal exposure to fetal antigens
Pathophysiology similar to anaphylaxis & septic shock
Treatment is generally supportive
Maternal-fetal morbidity & mortality frequent
OB teams should be prepared for acute emergencies
Team training & simulation training may be helpful
Better predictive and diagnostic tests are needed
Current efforts are being invested in improved diagnostic tests and treatment
Summary
All recommendations GRADE 1C
Evidence
All recommendations are GRADE 1C
(strong recommendation, low-quality evidence).
Thank You for Your Attention!
Planning Committee
Mike Foley, Director Shad Deering, co-Director
Helen Feltovich, co-Director Bill Goodnight, co-Director
Loralei Thornburg, Content co-Chair Deirdre Lyell, Content co-Chair
Suneet Chauhan, Testing Chair Mary d’Alton
Daniel O’Keeffe Andrew Satin
Barbara Shaw