Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | william-stobbart |
View: | 230 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 30
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
1/30
Contents
[03] Introduction
[05] The perception of space
[08] The psychological impact of buildings
[13] The psychological impact of cities
[16] Hitlers use of monumental architecture
[21] Reich Chancellery
[27] Conclusion
[30] Bibliography
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
2/30
Introduction
just as we think architecture with our bodies, we think our bodies through
architecture1
Architecture affects us on a subconscious level. The human brain has evolved
the ability to understand and react to our environment for survival. At some
point in our evolutionary history our brains developed consciousness. With the
advent of this new ability we lost the connection that many animals have with
the environment. Where we once were aware of our surroundings, these
reactions have been pushed to our subconscious. Often overlooked or
dismissed by rational thought these deep reactions still greatly affect us.
Architects may like to rationalize the variables of design, but people largely
perceive buildings emotionally through the senses. Moreover, in doing so they
employ those higher cognitive powers to only varying extents.2
The environment a creature lives in is what defines it, i.e. fish have gills to
breathe in water, and mammals have lungs to breathe air. This is an example
of a physical response to the environment but there are also psychological and
behavioural responses. The environment is our reality, if it changes our reality
changes with it. Therefore the ability to change the environment is also the
ability to influence how people perceive the world they live in. This dissertation
will investigate how architecture affects the mind and discuss how it can be
used to manipulate the behaviour of individuals and more importantly of
populations. One example of a time when architecture was used to great effect
to influence a group of people was during the Nazi rule of Germany. The
architecture of this period shall be explored as an example of how architecture
can be used in this way. This dissertation will look at how the processing of
1Marco Frascari, Monsters of Architecture Anthropomorphism in Architectural Theory, p.1
2 Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.188
2
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
3/30
memory is an integral part of how we understand the environment. This
cognitive mechanism is a fundamental part of why architecture has such an
impact on us.
Monumental architecture [] refers to large man-made structures of stone or
earth. These generally are used as public buildings or spaces, such
as pyramids, large tombs, large mounds (but not single burials), plazas,
platform mounds, temples, standing stones, and the like. The defining
characteristic of monumental architecture is typically its public naturethe fact
that the structure or space was built by lots of people for lots of people to look
at or share in the use of, whether the labor was coerced or consensual. 3 This
paper considers how the act of being in a crowd affects the behaviour of an
individual. Therefore this paper explores how monumental architecture can be
used to influence how people behave in large groups. Hitler was a prime
example of a powerful figure that attempted to use monumental architecture to
influence a population. This paper will focus on one of Hitlers buildings, the
Reich Chancellery, as an example of the architecture that Hitler created for
this purpose.
3K. Kris Hurst, Monumental Architecture,
http://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htm, accessed 2nd October 2010
3
http://archaeology.about.com/od/pterms/g/public_architec.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/od/pterms/g/pyramid.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/mounds.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/od/mayaarchaeology/a/inomata.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/od/pterms/g/public_architec.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/od/pterms/g/pyramid.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/mounds.htmhttp://archaeology.about.com/od/mayaarchaeology/a/inomata.htm8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
4/30
The perception of space
Our perception is visceral. Reason plays a secondary role4
In 2004 Semir Zeki and Hideaki Kawabata conducted an experiment on 10
subjects. Each subject examined 300 paintings and, after classifying them as
ugly, neutral, beautiful, they were shown the same images when inside an
fMRI scanner. The results were both expected and surprising. The works
judged beautiful, as expected, produced the highest activity in the orbito-
frontal cortex, an area that is intimately linked with the emotional limbic centres
of the brain and known to be associated with such emotional states as
romantic love. The works judged ugly, quite unexpectedly, activated the motor
cortex, as if the subjects wanted to take evasive action. The architectural
translation is clear. Good buildings fill us emotionally with a sense of
happiness and gratification, while bad buildings cause us to take flight []. 5
This test shows the very real reaction our primal instincts have to our
environment. Humans have evolved to instantly analyse an environment, to
know if it is safe, or dangerous and take the appropriate action. This is called
the fight or flight instinct6and scientists are beginning to understand that we
respond to all encounters on a subconscious level prior to our conscious
rationalisation. This means that our brain reacts to all new experiences in the
same way, rapidly assessing the situation. It is our consciousness that later
allows us to choose which action to take. Viewing a new building elicits the
same autonomic response as every other new experience.
4Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.189
5 Ibid, p.1846
See Walter Bradford Cannon (1915). Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage: An
Account of Recent Researches into the Function of Emotional Excitement, for further readingon the fight or flight instinct
4
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
5/30
To understand how the brain perceives space one must understand that we
approach every act of perception with a stored visual record of forms and
colors, which we have acquired over the course of a lifetime. These patterns,
as it were, interface with new perceptions and of course affect the way we
view new images.7 If this is applied to Nazi architecture one can see the
power that building in the neo-classical style has. Upon viewing one of Hitlers
neo-classical buildings the brain will be filtering through past experiences of
Roman architecture to classify this new experience, bringing with it thoughts of
stability, power and time that are associated with Rome. The following is an
example to explain more clearly the process, lets assume that you just
returned from a trip to Greece where you visited the Parthenon in Athens.
Figure 18
7 Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.1468The Parthenon, Greece, approx. 438 B.C.E.
http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth200/politics/parthenon.html, accessed 12December 2010
5
http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth200/politics/parthenon.htmlhttp://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth200/politics/parthenon.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
6/30
The perceptions that you would have formed of this experience are myriad.9
all of these stimuli [] would be processed in different areas of the brain: the
Athenian heat in one area, the color of the marble in another, the brightness of
the sunlight in still another, the forms of the columns and entablature in other
areas.10
suppose that before you had viewed the Parthenon you had visited the
classical Temple of Hephaestus adjacent to the old Athenian agora. Here you
would have a similar perceptual event of a fifth-century Doric temple, and its
memory would have brought something to the new experience. For instance,
the smaller scale of the Hephaestus might have given you a better
appreciation of the scale of the Parthenon, and the relatively intact condition of
the Hephaestus might have allowed you better to imagine the former glory of
the ParthenonHence your perception of the Parthenon would have been
altered by this earlier experience.11
if you sit back in your living room a few months later and recall the image of
the Parthenon, you pretty much activate the same neural circuitry that you
excited when first viewing the monument. The neuroscientist Joaqun M.
Fuster concludes from this discovery two important results with regard to
memory: first, that all memory is in essence associative, or an act of
classification.12 What this example highlights is that our brain, when
confronted with new information, uses past experiences to classify it. Imagine
how the brain begins to react if instead of viewing the Parthenon and
9 Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.16110 Ibid, p.16211
Ibid, p.16312 Ibid, p.164
6
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
7/30
Hephaestus, the brain is processing the image of one of Hitlers buildings such
as the Zeppelin fields or the Reich Chancellery. The neo-classical style
triggers images and memories of the Parthenon and Rome to be used in its
cerebral classification. Because neurons that fire together wire together13, with
those neural messages of Rome come thoughts of power, empire, and
agelessness. When it is taken into account that decisions made in the
prefrontal and parietal cortices can take place up to 10 seconds before they
enter our conscious awareness [] our judgments about buildings and other
things may take place long before we stand back and ponder their higher
meaning14
it is a powerful subliminal force. As Karl Marx noted, A commodity
appears at first sight an extremely obvious, trivial thing. But its analysis brings
out that it is a very strange thing, abounding in metaphysical subtleties and
theological niceties.15 The buildings we inhabit are such commodities. It is
only once we investigate them that we begin to consciously understand all the
qualities that they hold and effect us with.
The psychological impact of buildings
Architects and the people who hold the power to build have often changed the
environment we live in to affect the populations view of the person or people
in power. This technique is mostly used though monumental architecture of
which the Parthenon is an early example. It was a symbol of the power of
Rome and emphasised Romes ability to create grand structures. The building
itself speaks to the people of the manpower and finance needed to construct
13See D.O. Hebb, The organization of behavior, for further reading on the Hebbian theory of
how neurons may connect to become engrams14 Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.18415 Karl Marx, http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/k/karlmarx157963.html, accessed 26th
September 2010
7
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/k/karlmarx157963.htmlhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/k/karlmarx157963.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
8/30
it, but it also creates a space for huge crowds to assemble. The sheer size of
the building would have inspired awe in people and for many the effect would
be to make them feel insignificant. At a time when communication was
extremely slow bringing so many people together in one place would be a rare
event. The combination of the size of the building and the crowds would have
had an impact on crowd behaviour and made them more easily influenced.
According to Carl Jung, we synchronize our emotions and thoughts when we
come together in a group because we all share an identical "collective
unconscious", a universal framework of archetypes and motifs. It's as if, when
we get together, we all have the same subconscious script we're reading from,
written by our collective culture.16 This makes sense when combined with the
knowledge that our brain is constantly collecting experiences and using them
to categorise and respond to new experiences. If you take a group of people
from a geographical location the majority of them would have come into
contact with similar culture, architecture and politics. Therefore their brain
would be using similar archetypes to respond to new experiences.
The chameleon effect refers to nonconscious mimicry of the postures,
mannerisms, facial expressions and other behaviors of ones interaction
partners, such that ones behavior passively and unintentionally changes to
match that of others in ones current social environment. The authors suggest
that the [] mere perception of anothers behavior automatically increases the
likelihood of engaging in that behavior oneself.17 If you combine these two
16Gord, The Psychology of Entertainment Why We Love Watching in Crowds,
http://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspx, accessed 6th November 2010.17John A. Bargh and Tanya L. Chartrand, The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior
Link and Social Interaction, http://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdf,p. 893, accessed 7th November 2010.
8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscioushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscioushttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdfhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscioushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscioushttp://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdf8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
9/30
pieces of information about how the brain works one can begin to understand
how the behaviour of a crowd of people can be very different from the
behaviour of one of the individuals who make up the crowd. By creating places
that people could congregate in large numbers (Zeppelin Fields) Hitler was
using these innate neurological responses. Hitler built architecture where
people could gather which allowed him to create an environment where people
would feed off of each others responses. In this way he could affect a greater
number of people as the emotion spread and was magnified throughout the
crowd. An additional effect is that any dissenters would be intimidated by the
crowds response, most would find it difficult to express opposition when faced
with the overwhelming unity of the crowd.
Monumental buildings also have a passive effect when not in use that
advertises their potential to be filled with people all with the same mindset.
This sends a signal to everyone of the latent power of the regime that built it.
The structure is broadcasting that it will be filled with thousands of people all
part of the power that commissioned it.
If architecture depicts the nature of reality, then new ideas about reality can
be demonstrated through manipulation of architectural symbolism.18 A person
or institution can influence how the population views them by what they build.
They can also use building to communicate their views, for example Labour
governments have traditionally built housing for the workforce as a way of
demonstrating that they care for the working population. Leaders manipulate
the architectural vocabulary of a specific culture to make the people think []
whatever [] it is that they are attempting to convey. Though they do not
18Molly Glenn, Architecture Demonstrates Power
http://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf, p.12,accessed 28th September 2010.
9
http://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
10/30
manipulate the actual cosmos, they manipulate the peoples understanding of
that cosmos, the peoples cosmology, to make the people think that what they
state architecturally is real.19 This shows how architecture can affect us at the
subconscious, pre-rational level. Our brains interpret our environment before
our consciousness registers what it has seen. Our brains are designed to see
our environment as lines, colour and as associations with previous memories.
After our initial unconscious responses we tap into our instinct to rationalise
and our consciousness adds to our initial reaction with an assessment of the
value of the building. This assessment could include the cultural, political and
economic forces involved.
It is architecture that allows a structured view of society to form. Architecture
is a physical manifestation of structure since it must itself stand.20 To create a
building one must comprehend what is required for it to stand. From this
understanding Architecture allows structured thinking about reality in general,
leading society to create a structured cosmology [] a societys cosmology is
intricately linked to its architecture since its architecture provides the model for
thinking about it.21
Monumental architecture embodies the leaders ability to control and affect his
followers. It both shows the group his actual power and demonstrates his
worthiness and capacity to possess that power. Architecture is a sign pointing
to a leaders power.22 Upon viewing a piece of monumental architecture the
viewer is able to recognise the power of the person who commissioned the
19 Molly Glenn, Architecture Demonstrates Power
http://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf, p.13,
accessed 28th September 2010.20 Ibid, p.921Ibid, p.10
22 Ibid, p.18
10
http://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
11/30
building in the building itself. It is clear by the scale alone that the person who
commissioned the building has significant wealth or resources in order to do
so. The thought occurs to the viewer that only someone who wields power and
deserves it could muster the resources needed to build on that scale. The
pharaohs of ancient Egypt were masters of this concept. They ordered the
population to create mountains of stone (pyramids Fig. 2) in honour of their
status as gods. Not only were they creating architecture that enhanced their
status among the people, but also the act of building their monuments
reinforced in the work force the sense of their worthiness to rule. It is self-
supporting; I build because I am powerful, only the powerful could build what I
have built.
Figure 223
23The Pyramids, Giza, approx 2700-2500 B.C. http://www.travlang.com/blog/pyramids-of-giza-
a-landmark-in-the-history-of-architecture/, accessed on 28th November 2010.
11
http://www.travlang.com/blog/pyramids-of-giza-a-landmark-in-the-history-of-architecture/http://www.travlang.com/blog/pyramids-of-giza-a-landmark-in-the-history-of-architecture/http://www.travlang.com/blog/pyramids-of-giza-a-landmark-in-the-history-of-architecture/http://www.travlang.com/blog/pyramids-of-giza-a-landmark-in-the-history-of-architecture/8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
12/30
The psychological impact of cities
A societys organisation can also be read through its architecture, whether it is
democratic or totalitarian. A pattern exists wherein axial buildings and cities
are created by authoritarian powers concentrated in a single ruling figure []
furthermore, this correspondence between building orientation and power
scheme results directly from differing ideals about the nature of the world and
power.24 Different cities demonstrate this phenomenon. For example London
being based in a culture that is democratic has resulted in a city that has been
allowed to grow organically (Fig. 3). This has created a network of intertwining
streets that are mazelike. The range of architectural styles reflects the organic
growth of the city.
Figure 325
24Molly Glenn, Architecture Demonstrates Powerhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf, p.24,
accessed 28th September 2010.25Aerial view of London, 1851, http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/issues/091007/flow3.html,
accessed 28th September 2010.
12
http://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/issues/091007/flow3.htmlhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/issues/091007/flow3.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
13/30
In France the oppressive nature of the government created revolution.These
were particularly prevalent in Paris. On being elected president of the Republic
of France in 1848 Napoleon III decided to modernize Paris. In response to the
street revolutions he changed the architecture to reduce the ability for
revolutionists to hide on the narrow streets. Under the instruction ofGeorges
Eugne Haussmann they tore down the old Paris that had grown organically
like London and rebuilt it with straight roads that could be policed more easily
(Fig. 4). Streets were wide enough for mounted police and the lack of nooks
and crannies meant less places for people to hide.
Figure 426
26Paris and the Arc de Triomphe, 1852, https://marinacarlson.wordpress.com/category/dorky-
things-that-make-me-happy/, accessed 13th December 2010.
13
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Eug%C3%A8ne_Haussmannhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Eug%C3%A8ne_Haussmannhttps://marinacarlson.wordpress.com/category/dorky-things-that-make-me-happy/https://marinacarlson.wordpress.com/category/dorky-things-that-make-me-happy/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Eug%C3%A8ne_Haussmannhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Eug%C3%A8ne_Haussmannhttps://marinacarlson.wordpress.com/category/dorky-things-that-make-me-happy/https://marinacarlson.wordpress.com/category/dorky-things-that-make-me-happy/8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
14/30
Interestingly New York (Fig. 5) has a similar grid pattern to Paris but for
completely different reasons. The ideology of the grid in New York was to
ensure that every building was perceived as equal. Each building is on route to
something else as apposed to a focal point. This feeds into and supports the
American belief that everyone is born equal.
Figure 527
27Aerial view of New York City, approx. present day,
http://www.ektopia.co.uk/ektopia/2009/10/29/karen-o%E2%80%99leary%E2%80%99s-new-york-city-and-paris-map-cut-outs/, accessed 2nd December 2010
14
http://www.ektopia.co.uk/ektopia/2009/10/29/karen-o%E2%80%99leary%E2%80%99s-new-york-city-and-paris-map-cut-outs/http://www.ektopia.co.uk/ektopia/2009/10/29/karen-o%E2%80%99leary%E2%80%99s-new-york-city-and-paris-map-cut-outs/http://www.ektopia.co.uk/ektopia/2009/10/29/karen-o%E2%80%99leary%E2%80%99s-new-york-city-and-paris-map-cut-outs/http://www.ektopia.co.uk/ektopia/2009/10/29/karen-o%E2%80%99leary%E2%80%99s-new-york-city-and-paris-map-cut-outs/8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
15/30
Hitlers use of monumental architecture
Nazism was a totalitarian regime and as discussed leaders of these regimes
tend to build axial buildings and cities. Hitlers ideology was clearly visible in
his plans for Berlin, which was a blueprint for a totalitarian city (Fig. 6).
Figure 628
Nazi supporters thought that the circular plan [] was (un-Aryan) and
belonged to the matriarchal society of the Etruscans29, [] this reappeared
later in the central (or circular) type of church plan (versus the basilica, or
rectilinear plan). These architectural forms, the circular plan and the round
arch, had always been foreign to the Germans, said Rosenberg. The circular
form limits the view on all sides. It is directionless; it is, in plan, at the same
time free on all sides; in the deepest sense of the three-dimensional, a round
building cannot communicate a real sense of space, no matter how strong the
28Proposed model of Germania,
http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.html, accessed 2nd December2010
29 See Sybille Haynes, Etruscan Civilization: A Cultural History, for further reading on theEtruscans.
15
http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.htmlhttp://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
16/30
artists hand that formed it.30 In contrast to this was the German appreciation
of the axial design of Catholic Churches. Hitler admired the organisation of the
Catholic Church and recognised the influence that its architecture has.
The Catholic Church is an example of a hierarchal body that employs
architecture to great affect to warp the perception of reality. The places of
worship constructed by their followers use material and scale to propagate the
leaders view of the world, the doctrine employed by its priests and the
standing of the pope. Hitler wanted to mimic the power that the Church is able
to convey through its architecture. Hitlers model [] was the Roman Catholic
Church. The mysticism of Christianity, he said, created buildings with a
mysterious gloom which made men more ready to submit to the renunciation
of self. Hitler was deeply impressed by the organisation, ritual, and
architecture of the church. In writing of the spell which an orator can weave
over an audience, he said, The same purpose is served by the artificial and
yet mysterious twilight in Catholic churches.31 Architecture was one of Hitlers
weapons in Germanys political battles.32
Hitlers love of architecture [] was intense.33 He thought of architecture as
an art, and although he worked closely with the architects to whom he gave
commissions, he allowed the chosen few a remarkable freedom [] not only
did Hitler rarely intervene in the plans of his leading architect (Albert Speer
1905-1981), but he treated him with unusual respect, refused to allow him to
enlist, and concerned himself with the wellbeing of Speers family. When
Speer [] contravened Hitlers scorched earth orders in 1945 [] Speer
30 Robert R. Taylor, The Word in Stone: The Role of Architecture in the National Socialist
Ideology, p.57/5831Ibid, p.33
32Ibid, p.33
33 Ibid, p 29
16
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
17/30
quotes him as saying, if you were not my architect I would have to take the
steps necessary in these cases.34 Hitler had an innate understanding of the
power of architecture that he enhanced through years of reading on the
subject. He demonstrated an understanding of the impact that architecture has
on people through the buildings he commissioned while in power. Hitler
wanted his buildings to inspire the German people and he understood what
properties a building needed to have this effect. Much of what he was
attempting to do through architecture is now being described by research into
the neuroscience of how we perceive space. Hitler said that, [] good
(German) architecture would have both a therapeutic and propaganda
function. I am convinced, said Hitler, that art, since it forms the most
uncorrupted, the most immediate reflection of the peoples soul, exercises
unconsciously by far the greatest direct influence upon the masses of the
people. Of the power of building, Hitler declared that everyone was influenced
by the buildings in which work and recreation took place. Architecture, then,
could be used to improve the spiritual and psychological condition of the
German people. Appropriately designed buildings would help the German
community to rid itself of its inferiority complex, and would inspire patriotism
the architecture of the Third Reich would give people a strong sense of unity
and a limitless self-confidence.35 Through constant interaction with architects
and architectural theory Hitlers secretary reports that he could discourse on a
staggering number of details in the building style of churches, abbeys, and
castles.36 What is interesting is that all these types of structure are built to
represent power. He is focusing in on the architecture he could use to serve
the purpose he intended it for. Hitlers eclectic reading could have included
34Robert R. Taylor, The Word in Stone: The Role of Architecture in the National Socialist
Ideology, p.29/p.3035
Ibid, p.31/3236Ibid, p.21/22
17
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
18/30
Gottfried von Sempers Uber Baustyle (1869), in which the Viennese architect
maintained that monumental architecture served those in power, and helped to
direct and control the apathetic, restless masses. If he did read von Semper,
it is possible that he remembered this advice later when he inaugurated the
Third Reichs monumental building program.37
Hitler wanted his monumental buildings to be in a certain style, interested in
simple horizontal and vertical lines, his favourite styles were the neo-classical.
This didactic architecture, then, had an important role to play in proclaiming
the National Socialist ideology.
There are recurrent motifs which, in large representative structures,
characterise the architecture of the Third Reich. These buildings have neo-
classical colonnades (of columns or, more often, pillars), severe porticos,
horizontal lines and a rectilinear appearance emphasised by heavy cornices
and rows of thickly framed windows. The traditional elaboration of columns
with bases or capitols was simplified and the quality of the stone itself was
stressed. Both these trends suggest that the Nazi architects were aware of
the avant-garde drive for simplicity and for stress on the texture of building
materials.
In general, a heavy neo-classicism was the most obvious characteristic of the
monumental style of the Third Reich.38 It is important to note here how the
brain perceives space and form. Each part of our environment is broken down
and processed in different parts of the brain. Single cells or columns of cells
in the visual cortex, as we noted, might respond only to lines, but some even
37Robert R. Taylor, The Word in Stone: The Role of Architecture in the National Socialist
Ideology, p20/2138
Ibid, p.12/13
18
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
19/30
more selectively to just horizontal lines, others to vertical or diagonal lines.
Similarly, some respond only to one color or to one color placed against a
specific background. If we extend this principle to the realm of art, we begin to
see visual perception from a different perspective. The horizontal line of a
gable on a Greek temple, for example, might be processed in one part of the
visual cortex, while the diagonal sides of the gable are read in a another part,
the vertical columns in a third part. In no one part of the brain are the results of
these different processing stations joined again.39 This is a technique used
by the brain so that if there is wear and tear over time, or damage due to
trauma then we can still recall old memories so they can be used for further
categorisation. Our perceptions are deeply ingrained into our memories; this is
in part why architecture can have such an effect.
By building in a style that maximised the horizontal and vertical and stressed
the materials used Hitler was imprinting the form of his buildings into the most
basic parts of the brain. The effect of using a simple form was that when
viewed for the first time the classifications that the brain used to recognise this
form would be far broader. Making the task of associative recognition quicker.
This means that the image would spark more memories and create a visceral
reaction. By using a style that maximizes on the horizontal and vertical Hitler
had inadvertently tapped into the process described above that the brain uses
to safeguard against the loss of memory. So Hitlers buildings had a significant
and prolonged impact on those who saw them.
Reich Chancellery
39Harry Francis Mallgrave,Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, p.145
19
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
20/30
Figure 740
The Reich chancellery was the nerve centre of the Nazi party. Hitler wanted it
to be a representation and symbol of the Nazi ideals. It was to be impressive
and intimidating to visiting officials so that it proclaimed the strength of the new
Germany. An example shown below is the Voss-Strasse entrance. The scale
of the design is vast compared to a person. One would pass between tall
pillars before entering through two massive doors. It literally dwarfs any visitor
making them feel insignificant in the presence of such power. The windows
are placed at such a height that people in the street could not see into the
building but those inside could see out onto the street. A passer by would
never know if they are being watched. The windows also add to the symmetry
of the exterior. They are positioned in evenly aligned rows with small stone
ridges running along them. Except for an eagle above the door this was the
40Hitler stands over a proposed model with Albert Speer and other Nazi officials, no date,
http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.html, accessed 2nd December2010
20
http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.htmlhttp://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/speer.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
21/30
only decoration. The faade is a homage to order, no decoration interrupts the
lines of the pillars and windows. This is an echo of how Hitler wished the Nazi
ideals to be perceived, nothing would disrupt the order of the Nazi way.
Figure 8shows the Voss-Strasse entrance of the Reich Chancellery designed
by Albert Speer. The high columns and massive doors were used to create an
intimidating entrance to the centre of Nazi power.
Figure 841
Through the entrance is the Ehrenplatz(Fig. 9), or court of honor. Here there
41Voss-Strasse entrance to the Reich Chancellery, Germany, 1939,
http://www.rjkoehler.com/travelog/2010/10/into-the-past-old-keijo-imperial-university/,accessed 2nd December 2010
21
http://www.rjkoehler.com/travelog/2010/10/into-the-past-old-keijo-imperial-university/http://www.rjkoehler.com/travelog/2010/10/into-the-past-old-keijo-imperial-university/8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
22/30
is a continuation of an aesthetic of order. The courtyard is symmetrical, again
with very little decoration. This space had no other function but to intimidate.
Figure 942
It was a transitional area that was both inside and outside, preparing the visitor
to enter deeper into the heart of the Nazi court.
Once past the Ehrenplatz a visitor would be confronted with the mosaic hall
42 The Ehrenplatz, Germany, 1939, http://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture,
accessed 2nd December 2010
22
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecturehttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
23/30
(Fig. 10).
Figure 1043
This was a room created almost entirely from red granite. On viewing, the
brain is being confronted with a bold environment.
The viewer is first impressed by the overpowering nature of the exterior then
moves into a stark courtyard, which then leads into a room full of red granite.
In turn this then leads into the rotunda, a circular room that allows for the odd
twist of the original plan. Up until this point the visitor would have seen only
squares, rectangles and straight lines and the brain would have been
anticipating this pattern to continue. Just as the visitor would be getting used
to the addition of red marble they enter a round room. The rotunda is markedly
43 The Mosaic Hall, Germany, 1939, http://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture,
accessed 2nd December 2010
23
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecturehttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
24/30
smaller than the previous spaces but again the visitor would only have a brief
moment to adjust to this before they are confronted by the marble gallery (Fig.
11), which was a vast space that stretched off into the distance.
Figure 1144
The movement through these spaces would not allow the visitor to anticipate
what is coming next and this would have thrown people off balance and left
them disorientated by the time they arrived at Hitlers office (Fig. 12).
44The Marble Gallery, Germany, 1939,
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12963-the-reich-chancellerythe-marble-hall.html, accessed 2nd December 2010
24
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12963-the-reich-chancellerythe-marble-hall.htmlhttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12963-the-reich-chancellerythe-marble-hall.htmlhttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12963-the-reich-chancellerythe-marble-hall.htmlhttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12963-the-reich-chancellerythe-marble-hall.html8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
25/30
Figure 1245
It is a procession that assaults the minds ability to react to the environment. In
the middle of the marble gallery is the entrance to Hitlers study, which is itself
large in scale. Hitler said of this procession "The diplomats sitting in front of
me . . . [will] learn to shiver and shake,"46 In reality it did more than to cause
diplomats to merely shiver and shake. The political leader of Czechoslovakia
at the time was Dr. Emil Hcha. He experienced first hand the procession
through the Reich Chancellery on Tuesday March 14th 1939. During the
meeting with Hitler, which took place in his office, Hcha collapsed,
unconscious on the floor. It was only until after being seen by a physician that
he awoke. On Wednesday, March 15th, 1939 at 3.55am Hcha, the Czech
President, signed the document stating he had "confidently placed the fate of
the Czech people and country in the hands of the Fhrer of the German
45
Hitlers Office, Germany, 1939, http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12961-hitlers-office-in-the-reich-chancellery.html, accessed 2nd December 201046Steven Lehrer, The Reich Chancellery and Fhrerbunker Complex: An Illustrated History of
the Seat of the Nazi Regime. Quote taken fromhttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture, accessed 3rd November 2010
25
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12961-hitlers-office-in-the-reich-chancellery.htmlhttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12961-hitlers-office-in-the-reich-chancellery.htmlhttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecturehttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12961-hitlers-office-in-the-reich-chancellery.htmlhttp://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/general/p12961-hitlers-office-in-the-reich-chancellery.htmlhttp://sitemaker.umich.edu/artunderfascism/architecture8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
26/30
Reich." This is an incredible account of the power of an environment to have
an effect on an individual. One could argue that the highly stressful point in
history influenced Hcha. Or perhaps the age or personality of Hcha played a
part. However, it seems highly likely that the physical environment that Hcha
found himself in was a significant contributory factor. This argument is
supported by the theories discussed in this paper which points to information
that suggests the environment influenced Hchas response.
Conclusion
comforting or disturbing, the fact is we are basically dreaming machines that
construct virtual models of the real world47
Western society continues to rely on architecture as a symbol of power. This
is demonstrated by the continued use of monumental architecture. For
example the media televises views of Westminster during times of crisis or
significant events. This is because it represents the power of Great Britain as a
whole and can be used to reassure the public. The public recognise that the
building holds the people in power. Whether the leaders change over time
does not matter it is the building that represents or symbolises the power.
This dissertation has looked at the information behind the theory of how all
architecture can affect the mind. The paper explored how the brain processes
memory through classification and how this can be manipulated through
architecture. The way we perceive reality is influenced by our environment and
therefore the architecture we are surrounded by will determine how we view
47 Rodolfo R. Llins, I of the vortex: From Neurons to Self, p.168
26
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
27/30
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
28/30
education, healthcare, and rehabilitation. The combination of fields could not
only lead to better community structures, but also to the houses we spend our
lives in.
Bibliography
Bargh A. John and Chartrand L. Tanya, the chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction, journal of personality and socialpsychology, vol.76, no.6, pp. 893-910.
28
8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
29/30
http://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdf, accessed7.11.10
Cannon, Walter Bradford. Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage:An Account of Recent Researches into the Function of Emotional Excitement,BiblioBazaar, 2010
Frascari, Marco. Monsters of Architecture Anthropomorphism inArchitectural Theory, Maryland: Roman and Littlefield, 1991
Glenn, Molly. Architecture Demonstrates Powerhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdf, accessed on 28.09.10
Gord (only name given), The Psychology of Entertainment Why We LoveWatching in Crowds, http://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspx ,accessed 6.11.10.
Gutman, Robert (ed.), (introduction) Glazer, Nathan. People and Buildings,New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2009
Haynes, Sybille. Etruscan Civilization: A Cultural History, California: The J.Paul Getty Trust, 2000
Hebb, Donald .O. The organization of behavior, New York: Wiley & Sons,1949
Hirst, Kris. K. Monumental Architecture
http://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htm , accessed on02/10/10
Jaskot, Paul. B. The Architecture of Oppression: The SS, Forced Labor andthe Nazi Monumental Building Economy, London: Routledge, 2000
Kershaw, Ian. Hitler, London: Penguin, 2008
Lehrer, Steven. The Reich Chancellery and Fhrerbunker Complex: AnIllustrated History of the Seat of the Nazi Regime, Jefferson, North Carolina:McFarland, 2006
Llins, Rodolfo R. I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self, Cambridge: MA: MITPress, 2002Mallgrave, Harry Francis. Architects Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity andArchitecture, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell,2010
Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2005
Papayanis, Nicholas. Planning Paris Before Haussmann, London: The JohnHopkins University Press, 2004
Speer, Albert. Inside the Third Reich, London: Phoenix, 1995
29
http://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htmhttp://www.yale.edu/acmelab/articles/chartrand_bargh_1999.pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://thesis.haverford.edu/dspace/bitstream/10066/714/7/2003GlennM(Abridged).pdfhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://www.outofmygord.com/archive/2010/02/20/The-Psychology-of-Entertainment-Why-We-Love-Watching-in-Crowds.aspxhttp://archaeology.about.com/cs/glossary/g/monumental.htm8/3/2019 An Investigation Into Monumental Architecture
30/30
Taylor, Robert. R. The Word in Stone: The Role of Architecture in the NationalSocialist Ideology, London: University of California Press, 1974