+ All Categories
Home > Documents > An Open Letter to Edward Snowden to edward snowden.pdf · An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash...

An Open Letter to Edward Snowden to edward snowden.pdf · An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash...

Date post: 31-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
3
An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash qFiasco An Open Letter to Edward Snowden © Flash qFiasco, 2015 Dear Sir, It cannot have been easy for you. I know something of what it is to walk away from one’s country of birth, leaving one’s family and friends, and to settle in a far-away place. The circumstances in my case were less immediately pressing: I was not a fugitive. I left Amerika to study abroad; while abroad I discovered that I liked abroad much better. My later jetisoning of Amerikan citizenship was prophylac- tic. As my sister once remarked, I am not an ex- patriot--I never was a patriot. I think you did a courageous thing and the right thing. I also think you broke the law. And therein lies the rub. You cannot expect a government to accept that breaking the law is ever the right thing to do; governments never officially acknowledge that civil disobedience is justified. But posterity will vindicate you, as it has vindicated many other civil disobedients before. In some respects, partial vindi- cation has already begun: the Senate Intelligence Committee has publicly annoucned that it is determined to reign in the NSA: both its methods and its choice of targets are to be subject to closer Congressional scrutiny. Several other nations have expressed an intention to re-route Internet traffic away from U.S. links, to prevent mass surveillance of data. These are good things, and they would not have happened but for your revelations. Governments of the day invariably mistake their own interest for that of the nation. The present administration in Washington D.C. is no exception. The U.S. government could easily demonstrate that you harmed the interests of the National Security Agency, ignoring the fact that the interests of national security might be different from, or indeed incompatible with, those of the National Security Agency. Do not expect a fair trial if they should ever get you in custody; a guilty verdict is a foregone conclusion. Pleading that you did the right thing, that you were defending individuals’ rights or world peace, would be to no avail; a judge is bound to consider only whether you broke some law, not whether what you did was right in any higher sense, constitutionally, morally, or internationally. Speaking as one nerd to another, I was not surprised by your revelations. Much of what the NSA did (and presumably still is doing) in trawling for data, I knew to be feasible--I myself have trained people (including, among others, the German Bundes Nachrichten Dienst ) to do similar things. What did surprise me was the scale of it, and the depth of the paranoia which lies behind it. It is sobering indeed to realize that the U.S. government is running so scared these days that it deemed it necessary, prudent, and appropriate to intercept and document every email and telephone connection entering or leaving the country. Not since the Stasi undertook to steam open every letter entering Communist East Germany has the world seen such a maniacal effort to control people. Of course, the U.S. government would never admit that this is a fear reaction; the U.S. government would no doubt claim that it is merely “monitoring” current threats in order to “protect” ordinary citizens. But monitoring invariably creeps over into controlling. I belong to a different generation than yours; I grew up with Watergate. During that time, a U.S. president misused the FBI to spy on domestic political opponents. Whenever a government spies on innocent people, it in effect treats them as no longer innocent, and this itself is a grievous affront to liberty. As your revelations have made clear, the potential for abuse of surveillance is still very real. Moreover, given the global reach of the NSA compared with that of the FBI during the Nixon years, the threat to liberty is greater than ever before. I take you to be a man of principle and conscience. If Thoreau’s words-- “It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right”--resonate with you, then I should like to make your acquaintance. We could play chess or plough through Wireshark trace files together (find the missing bit). If you should ever make it to Switzerland, I’ll buy you a drink (being careful to remove the battery from my mobile phone). You’ll find my public key elsewhere at this web site. Kind regards, FqF
Transcript
Page 1: An Open Letter to Edward Snowden to edward snowden.pdf · An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash qFiasco An Open Letter to Edward Snowden ... one’s country of birth, leaving one’s

An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash qFiasco

An Open Letter to Edward Snowden© Flash qFiasco, 2015

Dear Sir,It cannot have been easy for you. I know something of what it is to walk away from one’s country

of birth, leaving one’s family and friends, and to settle in a far-away place. The circumstances in my casewere less immediately pressing: I was not a fugitive. I left Amerika to study abroad; while abroad Idiscovered that I liked abroad much better. My later jetisoning of Amerikan citizenship was prophylac-tic. As my sister once remarked, I am not an ex-patriot--I never was a patriot.

I think you did a courageous thing and the right thing. I also think you broke the law. And thereinlies the rub. You cannot expect a government to accept that breaking the law is ever the right thing todo; governments never officially acknowledge that civil disobedience is justified. But posterity willvindicate you, as it has vindicated many other civil disobedients before. In some respects, partial vindi-cation has already begun: the Senate Intelligence Committee has publicly annoucned that it is determinedto reign in the NSA: both its methods and its choice of targets are to be subject to closer Congressionalscrutiny. Several other nations have expressed an intention to re-route Internet traffic away from U.S.links, to prevent mass surveillance of data. These are good things, and they would not have happenedbut for your revelations.

Governments of the day invariably mistake their own interest for that of the nation. The presentadministration in Washington D.C. is no exception. The U.S. government could easily demonstrate thatyou harmed the interests of the National Security Agency, ignoring the fact that the interests of nationalsecurity might be different from, or indeed incompatible with, those of the National Security Agency. Donot expect a fair trial if they should ever get you in custody; a guilty verdict is a foregone conclusion.Pleading that you did the right thing, that you were defending individuals’ rights or world peace, wouldbe to no avail; a judge is bound to consider only whether you broke some law, not whether what youdid was right in any higher sense, constitutionally, morally, or internationally.

Speaking as one nerd to another, I was not surprised by your revelations. Much of what the NSAdid (and presumably still is doing) in trawling for data, I knew to be feasible--I myself have trainedpeople (including, among others, the German Bundes Nachrichten Dienst) to do similar things. Whatdid surprise me was the scale of it, and the depth of the paranoia which lies behind it. It is soberingindeed to realize that the U.S. government is running so scared these days that it deemed it necessary,prudent, and appropriate to intercept and document every email and telephone connection entering orleaving the country. Not since the Stasi undertook to steam open every letter entering Communist EastGermany has the world seen such a maniacal effort to control people. Of course, the U.S. governmentwould never admit that this is a fear reaction; the U.S. government would no doubt claim that it ismerely “monitoring” current threats in order to “protect” ordinary citizens. But monitoring invariablycreeps over into controlling.

I belong to a different generation than yours; I grew up with Watergate. During that time, a U.S.president misused the FBI to spy on domestic political opponents. Whenever a government spies oninnocent people, it in effect treats them as no longer innocent, and this itself is a grievous affront toliberty. As your revelations have made clear, the potential for abuse of surveillance is still very real.Moreover, given the global reach of the NSA compared with that of the FBI during the Nixon years, thethreat to liberty is greater than ever before.

I take you to be a man of principle and conscience. If Thoreau’s words-- “It is not desirable tocultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right”--resonate with you, then I should like to makeyour acquaintance. We could play chess or plough through Wireshark trace files together (find themissing bit). If you should ever make it to Switzerland, I’ll buy you a drink (being careful to remove thebattery from my mobile phone). You’ll find my public key elsewhere at this web site.

Kind regards, FqF

Page 2: An Open Letter to Edward Snowden to edward snowden.pdf · An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash qFiasco An Open Letter to Edward Snowden ... one’s country of birth, leaving one’s

An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 2 Flash qFiasco

Graffiti seen in Bern, Switzerland, just around the corner from the U.S. embassy.

Page 3: An Open Letter to Edward Snowden to edward snowden.pdf · An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 1 Flash qFiasco An Open Letter to Edward Snowden ... one’s country of birth, leaving one’s

An Open Letter to Edward Snowden 3 Flash qFiasco

copyright 2015 by Flash qFiascowww.flashq.orgend of file


Recommended